Salvatore Pais' Superforce

We are alive here today with Salvator Pious, one of my favorite people on
the planet. Right now, he is doing my first ever interview. This
is going to be hard truse with Salvator Pious and Ashton Forbes. So right
off the bat, sir, go ahead and introduce yourself. Never ever call
me sir number one, call me brother. That really goes to the soul
with me. So Ashton, thank you very much. This is an honor
to be your first interview. So I'm pretty sure there will be a lot
more after this one. Trust me on that now, and I hope to
be in further interviews as well. That'd be great. Now, all right,
let me give a disclaimer right off the bat. I'm required to do
this, so I come on this podcast as a private citizen and the let's
say, the statement, speculations, opinions that I make are in no way
implicating the United States Navy nor the United States Space Force. They are my
own and as such I shall present them. Now. Can I give five
minutes? So arg and okay, floor is yours, sal The floor is
yours, Thank you, sir. I was born in Romania. I'm very
proud of my Romanian heritage. You can call me American apple pie made in
Romania. I just love hearing that. I heard it once before. It
I like that, so I will say something in Romanian so people are convinced
that I'm from that Roman Treasca Roman Treasca Romania and n uh Basically it says
I'm very proud of be Romanian, hooray for the Romanian people, hooray for
Romania, and nothing without God. And as far as why I'm here,
uh we. A friend of mine told me that they have changed right after
the Timber and Tour interview where I gave an interesting rendition of the Piace effect
called police affect resurgence. By the way, I practically implore your audience and
everyone on the livestream to google the police affect resurgence. Those three words Piace
affect resurgence. It goes directly to a Timber and Tura page. We will
tell one day whether it's taken down or that it's you know, another little
point in the spectrum. Let's call it that. Yeah. So basically in
Wikipedia and October eighteenth, I believe this year they changed right after the interview,
almost they changed to say that my work now represents a scam, a
pseudoscience disinformation when you go into bing. Now, the AI agent never before
has it done this. It caused my work crack Potter, and it's almost
as if my work is starting to have a concerted effort to be undermined shadow
Band, and you have to question why, especially after the Timbentur interview.
You have to see that to see where I'm coming from now, it is
very important to also understand that I challenge the mainstream physics community to send their
best. We're talking about people like Carver Mead. We're talking about people like
Seth Lloyd, next Uh, Max Tech, Mark, David Gross, Uh,
Brian Keating, Stepan Alexander, Yeah, others, Frank Wilcheck any Nobel
Prize winner they have out there. I wish to have a committee whereupon I'm
given one hour. I'll go to the blackboard and prove to them that the
Piace effect and the super forse concept are correct. I'll show them exactly how
they were derived. They're extremely simple and minimalistic math. I believe in Arkham's
razor. I do not believe that mathematical acrobatics should pass for great physics.
As a matter of fact, I believe the simpler the mathematics, the more
important the physics, especially if you have a good understanding of what the problem
is. Many times great physics is found by accident, is not actually looked
for. And one other thing that I wish to mention also is that this
is no new physics. This is a new perspective on all physics. And
this is what makes it incredibly interesting because there's so many things out there that
have not been tried yet. It is as if classical electromagnetism theory has been
put aside the moment quantum theory came in a lot of things that we're introduced
by Oliver Heavyside into the equation of Jim squat Maxwell where sidelined and things they
should have been looked at weren't. Anyway, I will not There's one more
thing that I need to say, because it we have to be careful exactly
how I answer certain questions on the Poe effect, because unfortunately, as almost
every other piece of physics out there, the pace effect can be weaponized and
it can create a super weapon of world weapons, a weapons of such incredible
power as to render the Teller Ulam device a pop gun in comparison, and
this is not ubras this is mathematics and physics. Now, it is also
important to realize that a weapon of this nature, any army, and I
mean any army that would feel the weapon of this nature first, would become
invincible. Number one, number two, and this is incredibly hot. It's
very, very important to understand. What this super weapon would represent is a
new epoch in deterrence. No sane nation is suicidal, and any insane nation
should not exist. Hence, let's leave the super weapon in the realm of
physics. But let let the audience know, let your live stream know that
certain things numbers, frequency, ranges, spectrums I cannot discuss. This is
something that can be quite detrimental to national security if taken in the how should
I say from the incorrect perspective? So I will not even touch on that
if I I hope I have you understanding that if I disagree with a question,
I will try to be as as polite as possible, but I will
say, in the interest of national security, I can unanswer that question.
Yeah, so you already went through like four of my questions right there from
your interview, from your intro right there, and I just want to agree
with you on that front. You know, I've heard you say multiple times
that you are not a spy and you are not a patriot. I am
also not a spy and I am a patriot as well. And to that
sense, the thing I would bring up is, this is actually one of
the optional things I was going to bring up at the end, but you
just kind of addressed it, is that My opinion is that most likely our
foreign adversaries have already potentially figured out this type of technology if what you're going
to be telling to us is true, And what that means from a humanities
perspective is we need to be very responsible with this technology. Because I agree
with you. I talked about it last night in my space that mutual as
short destruction. But it's a whole different epoch of deterrents that we are not
just nuclear weapons anymore. Now we're talking about something else millions of time.
I was more dangerous that can modify space time. And as a matter of
fact, the Shwingle limit breaking breaking the Shwingle limit points to that fact.
This is physics, This is not This is not crack pottery, this is
fiction. It's just absolutely not sometimes I wish it was. It is not
science fiction. This is science fact. And I'm like you, if I
accidentally call you sir, it's just a matter of respect. I do that
a lot for people that I respect, and you're one of the people.
I have the same thing. Don't take personal offense. If I do it.
My own boss is like, stop calling me. He's a great dude.
Yeah, So you're ready to diget into this thing because I think that
you touched on part of what I want to begin with, which is you've
mentioned in your previous podcast, and I don't want to rehash all the stuff
that you've talked about before, especially with Kurt, who I thought you had
a great interview with. I listened to the whole thing, and he's a
very smart guy, especially when he was talking about quantum gravity. I just
thought, Wow, this guy is super intelligent, well courage I mongo is
truly a theoretical thing. If he was representative of the mainstream physics community and
he had to say, I'm one hundred percent that at least you'll give me
a hearing. Yep, at least, And I think our plan here what
I want to do is hopefully vindicate you in their eyes as well, and
get that hearing that you want, because I think that what we're going to
be talking about today, the physics that we're going to be going over,
is practical. It's stuff that can really exist, and we need to make
sure that it gets the proper respect. And that kind of goes into my
first question and point is that you've mentioned that your papers were submitted to I
believe Cornell, and they wouldn't publish them without a sponsor, right, Why
do you think that is? What do you think your view is there?
Cornelli University Archive is in my opinion, the best three print service of all
time. As a matter of fact, once you publish an Archive, most
likely your paper will be published in a highly impacted journal, if at least
not a high impact, at least a moderate impact journal. So in other
words, one hundred percent your paper will be published. So I have great
respect for Archive. The fact that they need sponsors. Maybe it's quite possible
that a lot of individuals put certain physics in there. That is, I
look, Joe the plumber can write a physics paper if he understands the precept,
the foundational, the fundamentals of physics. Once you understand them. You
can write a physics paper, and even Joe the Plumber can publish an archive
if he has a sponsor, unfortunately, But the whole idea being is we're
not living in the time of Einstein, where basically a Swiss patent clerk can
get five papers published. This is the Anno mirabilis, the year of the
greatest five papers, in my opinion, that open physics to a whole different
dimension of of of of of of reality, of possibility. Conditional There's no
such things impossibility, the only conditional possibilities. But to go back to the
idea of why I think Archive is blocking and needs a sponsor is sometimes you
can judge. You cannot just go on Archive and say, look, Einstein
was wrong and here's that please. You know, there there have been so
many proofs as to the fact that the gravitational field equations of Einstein must be
at least partially correct because there's so much experimental evidence for it. So bring
if you have a theoretical argument against Einstein, then you must argue from a
very strong mathematical and physical background and also present experimental proof, and some of
these papers, unfortunately do not. Now I understand where they're coming from.
How Whoever, in my opinion, we do not live in the time of
Planck and Einstein and Heisenberg and the great ones. Even Fireman, I mean
Fireman is about nineteen fifties. Still we don't know. So I think that's
hard to publish. And sometimes people that should not even get there because they
know the editor or the chief at a Please nepotism in physics, I'm permissible,
And that's what I would argue as well. Just not to cut you
off, but I think that I agree with you there, And what I
would argue is that academia's kind of forgotten what science is, right. Science
is a scientific method. It's the study of observable reality, of being able
to experiment and be able to prove concepts, you know. And I think
that now what you just pointed out is that it's been inundated with credentialism,
right, and saying who do you know? On what do you know?
And so you know. One kind of point that I would say, kind
of closing that bit off, because I think that you have been done at
disservice, is that sometimes seeing is believing, you know. Imagine if we
had video proof or experimental proof out there that could prove your concepts right.
Maybe that would give another level of credibility to the things that you're saying.
Absolutely, sir, experiment Trump's theory every time. Again, experiment Trump's theory
every time. And it's an interesting verb and a lot of people get a
little itchy when they hear that word. But still experiment Trump's theory every time.
Now, can I just give a quick edition of the poace affect Resurgence.
Oh, it's important for people to before. In my papers, actually
in my patents, there was one paper that I was able to publish in
a high impact journal. I triply try Action some plasma science. It's on
the plasma compression fusion device. And the chief editor had two two different I
went through two different review boards. I mean it took a long time.
As you can see if you look, it took a long time for me
to publish respective. I went back and forth, argue this argue, but
at least they were open minded enough to realize it was something new, something
worthy of being seen. Again. This is all I asked for, is
a chance to express myself, to express this physics that I think can have
some meaning to the progress of civilization. I want nothing more. I don't
want royalties, I don't want money for that. I don't want anything except
the progress of civilization. We need unification of civilization in order that we do
not perish from desert. I'm afraid of the future, sir. It looked
extremely blank at this point than time, and we have we either come together
and as one unification, one unified civilization, or we shall perish. That's
what I've said many times as well. Actually, and I think that what
you said about science is very accurate too, and that the way I've seen
science too is that it can be encrusted, very molded, and then it
takes somebody to push it forward, break through the barrier, right And with
your science, that's what I see, is that I see that people don't
want to believe in it because they haven't been told that it's possible. And
if they were just look at your math and look at your models, I
think that they would realize that there's something there that's actually substantial and then it
can push us forward. The thing you said about unification, I say that
almost every single time, is that we live in such a divided world right
now, where if we get that unification. This science could potentially be that
thing that unifies us towards common purpose. Right. The physics of the super
force, in my opinion, can bring about unification of mind and soul.
The two should not be driven apart. The one and the same, one
manifestation of the other. All is one, One is all. This is
the true basis of hermeticism, and this is a true basis of all future
of civilization. If we have a chance to survive, this is it unification
of civilization. It has to be a common goal, a common objective.
And why not. I remember at one point Eric Weinstein, as a matter
of fact, mention one time travel. Maybe this should be our final objective
to leave this Earth, break the tackles of Earth, break the bounds of
Earth, and become an interstellar civilization that maybe, just maybe will give us
a chance for survival. The road that we are currently on is total abysmal
in perdition. I couldn't agree more so, let's sake, let's tack your
detrip quickly. Oh I was going to go to that in just a second.
I think that's the next question, if you don't mind, Because what
I want to do is I want to debunk this. There's a debunk of
a debunk of you. So the biggest thing I think your detractors mentioned when
we talk about your patents. They claim that you can patent anything. Now,
what I read or from watching your last interview, is that only three
of your five patents were even approved, which to me would indicate that it's
not true. So I would like to get your opinion on that, sir.
There's very simple way to debunk the I don't even know what the correct
terminology is anymore. For example, I don't use uap UFOs. You shouldn't
have raised seventy years of history just because I'm thinking that new terminology would somehow
eliminate the derision. The derision is far more basic than that history is important,
sir. Yep, never forget, never forget history, okay, But
anyway, the way to argue that is look at the office actions of a
great primary examiner called Philip Bonzell of USPTO. Oh my goodness, him and
I went back and forth between him Mark Blute, who is the United States
never patent lawyer and also a good friend of mine, an amazing paper lawyer.
This trust me. Anybody that can write those and also the office actions.
You should see what Mark did. You should see what Mark Blue did
with the office actions. In response to Philip Bonzell, Philip Bonzell, I
mean he really bit into the physics. He said, you cannot tell me
that it's possible to create electric fields and the order of ten to the eighteen
votes per meter and induction magnetic induction otherwise known as B fields magnetic flux density
and your order of ten to the nine tesselas. And it's an easy way
to remember that it's equal c being the speed of light free space. But
anyway, so that's how I remember the numbers. Sometimes I forget that myself.
But the whole idea is once once you're able to create, it's not
exactly that you create E and B of that, it's the energy density that
you can create from rendering the price effect and the piace affect speaking to the
pace effect, Is it okay? If I give yeah, I think that's
a good segue. That was my next thing, So jump on in.
What's your definition of the Pioce effect for our viewers? Okay? It it
can be thought of as controlled motion of electrically charged matter going from solid to
plasma undergoing rapid acceleration transients via accelerated vibration and or accelerated spin, leading into
very high energy densities being formed. Because remember, the electromagnetic energy flux is
really the speed of light c times the energy density the epsilon subnot the epsilon.
Sorry sometimes I drift into my my English. So the epsilon zero times
the electric field square. So see times epscellent zero times the electric field square.
That is your s your the magnitude of your pointing back. Let's call
it. That's the electromagnetic flux. And that electromagnetic energy flux. If it's
on the order of ten to the thirty three what's for me the square which
really corresponds to a energy density, and the or of ten to the twenty
five chools for me the tube. Then we can break the Shingle limit.
If we can achieve anything past that those particular values. We can actually put
it this way, vacuum DK complete vacuum K interesting. So the shing The
limit is really the achievement that, all of a sudden you the very quantum
fabric of space time it is unraveled, it breaks apart, it tears apart,
and you can see it by the formation of particle anti particle pairs.
This quite a bit now ration give yeah, I'm sorry. I promise this
is the only time all interrupt because it's important to see the the That's why
I call it the resurgence of the pace effect. Another way to see what
the price effect is all about is to say it's really the generation of extremely
high energy densities that are obtained by the accelerated vibration and or accelerated spend of
a non equilibrium plasma. Then means the plasma that's out of equilibrium. You
can think of that. They have a term for it called cold plasma cold
and you know, non thermal plasma. And it really has to do the
the electrons of this plasma. Uh. They talked to the plasma density very
high. I cannot go into numbers, but anyway, okay, so what
right? So these but uh, the the the number of these electrons do
not observe something called Maxwell Boltzmann distribution. That's what a cold plasma is all
about, an out of equilibrium or non equilibrium plasma. Once you drive that
far from equilibrium, every particular vibrational frequency. Yeah, you can X,
you can induce extremely high energy densities. Yeah, if if you do this
locally, think of it. You know, the thing popped into my mind
sometimes you know, some crazy stuff. But anyway, think of it as
a stake. You take the meat tenderizer, you know, the big hammer,
and you keep on pummeling at the same spot over and over. What
do you see? Eventually? A hole? Ye? All? Ain't that
interesting? So is that the vibrational acceleration there that you're kind of describing.
What I'm describing is the unraveling, the ripping apart, the tearing apart locally
of the space time fabric at a quantum level determined by this incredible amount of
energy density that is put at that particular point. The more energy you put
in a particular point, the more that in that locality space time will break
apart, will tear apart, And it's possible that a hole, a hole
will develop like a black hole, almost if we truly understand what a black
hole is. But you see, I just like Frank Worldship. See Frank
wild Chip also believes in the materiality of the vacuum. In other words,
we we're dealing I'm not quite sure if it's a crystal lattice when I talk
about time crystals here, even though that's another thing that Professor Wilcheck is greatly
known for. But we're talking about almost like a the at a quantum level.
You can think of space time as being a material. It could be
a super fluid, but it also has almost a space time geometric structure to
it. And that's what my super Forwar speaks to mine. It's quite possible
others have come up with these ideas before, but the equation one in that
super Force paper, and please post the super Force paper and also the AI
double A paper and also the I tripolitps paper to your life stream and send
it to everyone. You know, those three papers best represent my work.
I believe in the in the number three like a great man that that once
lived. And I shall not mention because I mentioned him before and many and
he trust me. This Nicola Tesla will go down in history as one of
the greatest we've ever had. And and and the way he was treated abysmo,
absolutely abysmo. That dude, JP Morgan, watch out, watch out
if you know what I mean anyway, Yeah, yeah, so yeah,
I think that interesting enough. So I think for people who are in the
chat. You know what you just said about the papers. I posted them
on my Twitter before. I'll throw them in the description later on as well.
But share those papers, sal here is telling you guys that you know,
share far and wide. Those are very important. Now with respect to
some of the what you're talking about around the pious effect, you know,
I think that what I saw one of your past interviews too, is that
using vibrations as opposed to spin is potentially more beneficial. Can you explain that
a little bit, yes, sir, you can. For example, the
we we tried an experiment called the high energy Electromagnetic field generator to see whether
we can get the magnitudes of the pointing dector, namely the electromagnetic energy fluxus
very high up based on accelerated spin of an electrically charged object. Unfortunately,
we could not get an electric charge more than ten to the minus eight culms.
You put that in that sigma square term, which is a surface charge
density squared, and you'll see it's quite at the turn. We're talking about
ten to the minus sixteen going against you. And even though we try to
make the test section very small to it still however, for anyone that's out
there and wants to see further what the high energy electro Magnetfield General Experiment brought.
I encouraged them for a fire and actually get the unclassified report. There
were two anomalies. There were two anomalies that were observed. As a matter
of fact, some very highly placed people from the Technical Committee of the Senate
Arm Services Committee came two navy packs to interrogate, how should I say,
the members of the Invention Evaluation Board on why they passed these five pattern applications
because a lot of people said that, if anything, these should have been
classified. So there was a whole team that was sent from the Senate Arm
Service Committee to investigate. I'm pretty sure that certain individuals I shall not name
names, but they have said, oh, this was a scam. This
was a total h misappropriation of funds, even though we're talking about only what
point five million for like I don't know, like fifty people of a period
of three years. Please, I mean through the math and you'll see what
I'm talking about compared to some of the stuff that's going on. And by
the anyway, I shall I shall not make it too dark now, So
the whole idea being is there's a report out there, it's unclassified and it
talks about two and so even with a charge like ten to the minus eight
coulans instead of the one Kulamb needed to get the kind of energy densities we
we're truly looking for to observe certain phenomena that I can underscuss those are anyway.
Yeah, even with that, two anomalies were reported and they actually in
the report, So that's interesting. Yeah, I'm mental observations. We're not
talking about theory here. We talk about experimental observations. That's my next question
too, related to as accelerated vibration, like what's the delivery mechanism? Can
a laser do that? Or can you speak to that? Or is that
sure? Sure? I just speak with it, but only in the general.
Yeah, just the point, just the point that it is very interesting
that the twenty twenty three Physics Nobel Prize went for what electron dynamics induced by
ATO second lasers? Yeah, into the minus eighteen second lasers. Very interesting.
We're not talking about fental second, we're talking about ato second. There's
a reason, so let me say, let me just leave it there.
Interesting. Yeah, are you familiar with meta materials, sir, probably I
have some familiarity with that, Yes, sir, so I I would rather
not discuss that portion. It has something to do with certain things. So
yeah, that's fine, So let's go on to the next one. Then,
in terms of your patents, and this might be a question, I
don't know if you can answer or not, but do you think that these
patents are operable today? Yes, sir anology. See a lot of people
have questioned on that, and I said, how did the uspeak your publishers
they were not properly enabled, because you know they are. All the ingredients
are there, but you have you have to know what you're doing. Number
one. Number two, it is important to understand the nature of the materials,
the piece of electrics, exactly how they operate. For example, what
is the main difference between strontium and titan a barying titan Aight? What exactly
is something called the most power effect? Anyway, I mentioned it actually in
a publication of Mind, one of the few papers I was able to actually
publish in a journal, but only because it was in the beginning of the
journal. And I think my opinion is is that the chief editor needed papers
for anything, and he was taken aback by by the the what's what's the
best the ambition of the idea. Let's let's put it was actually the High
Energy Electromagnetic Field Generator. That paper that I published, I think it was
the International Journal Journal of Space Science and Engineering. And trust me, I
tried to publish the super Force paper the same journal, thinking, you know,
I published the Conditional Possibility of Spacecraft of Space Ambitional Possibility of spacecraft propulsion
at superluminal speeds, and that high Energy electromagnet Field Generator in the same volume.
I think it was volume three of I think I think it was Issue
Anyway, it was. They were both published in the same volume. One
of them is a technical note, the other as a full fledged paper,
a technical paper. I try to publish the super FORSE paper in the same
journal. They would not. It's as if my name is on some sort
of a blacklist. You know, they mean, oh, Salva, tope,
no, no, no, just I'm talking about sending papers and having
rejections within a matter of twelve to fifteen hours. Wow, that's interesting what
I'm saying. I don't know. Have you ever gotten the my results?
Are changing quickly. If I google you right now, is that going to
happen? It's a bit of a badge of honor, you know, I
between you and I. I have some friends back in New York City that,
how should I say? They watch for my statistics. One of them
said, one time I googled your name because he watched. He actually has
to go charge of it. He said that at one point in time,
when you google salvatopies, you got over three hundred million results, and all
of a sudden it dropped to like seven million, and then it went up.
He had no idea what was going on. He said, this is
not possible. Well, what are we talking about here? I mean,
you have numbers higher than Andrew Date. But oh, I hope I didn't
get anybody cancer from you. I don't think so it's not anyway. So
I think I wanted to jump into the super force in your equation number one,
which you wanted to talk about, because I read through your paper.
I looked through all the patents as well, trying to do my best as
a layment to understand them. And when I look at your super force,
uh, you know, especially with equation number one, it basically says that
if you look carefully at the mathematical structure of the plank force, you can
realize that this is the super force. It does not contain the h bar
for you say this, namely the modified reduce plant concept. Therefore, it
can relate to quantum phenomena exhibiting macroscopic classical behavior, namely a macroscopic quantum phenomenon.
Now, when I look at that, I think, are we talking
about a unification of quanta and macro? And is that how you would argue
your equations? Here? Absolutely, sir, Equation one speaks to exactly what
you're talking about. And as a matter of fact, page two of that
it's just a three page paper. I mean, anybody for goodness sake.
Oh maybe that's why I got a fifteen hour rejection because it was extremely fast.
But you know, just that equation one, yeah, is so powerful
because I will tell you what it says. It actually says, it's the
super force that is the energy gradient at both the plank scale and the energy
gradient at the horizon scale, which is when to talk about observable universe.
How is that possible that the superforce can be the energy gradient at the very
lowest scales, signifying the lowest of our realms, the quantum realm, and
also the highest that we understand, the observable universe. Not only that,
I believe because of the way it's fashioned. For example, if one day
we were to find out that our universe doesn't have an observable radius, say
of like and the order of ten to the twenty ten to the twenty seven
meters, it has something on the order of ten to the eighty meters or
something of that nature, that equation would give you how much mass is in
that structure, which would think what that means. It means really we're living
in some sort of a matrix like the space time geo metal structure that can
be altered the constructor construct the construct of some sorts, which is I'm not
going to talk to the simulation hypothesis because I think this is very real.
I believe when I pinch myself it really hurts. So so I'm Einstein said
something far far, far more subtle and far more philosophical nature, and namely,
he believes that the moon is still there even though he's not looking.
That's a good argument. Yeah, And I think that we can the spiritual
stuff we can dig into potentially, and then the follow up interview because I
think that that we probably are on the same wavelength there in terms of our
beliefs on that. And but the only thing I would say is that from
my own personal perspective, the more I dig into the science and dig around
the science, especially on this, the more spiritual actually become. I thought
it would be the opposite, but it turns out that no. I think
that I have more of a spiritual understanding the more I dig into science,
which is very interesting. And I want the equation one from now on to
be addressed at as the super Folis equation. You know, if it Mitchokaku
can can say that he's you know, he has the God equation, then
you know, I think my humorous level is far lower by saying it's mine.
Okay, it was your the way to explain it. I think I've
heard you say before. As well as the super force is acting on space
time, geometric structure, all points in space and time as well. Absolutely
it also speaks to quantum entanglement. Then every point in space and time is
connected because of the existence of the super force. Yes, it exists at
ten to the minus thirty five meters, which is the flank length. But
still it Oh, one more thing the super force equation speaks to, which
is when I realized that, I said, whoa, whoa, whoa,
Oh my goodness, if you put in that equation. Okay, So the
super force the equation for is C to the power of four divided by big
G. So it basically says speed of light to the fourth power divided by
big G. And if you put in if you realize there's such a thing,
for example, okay, if it talks to an energy ingredient at every
scale, because that's what equation one really says. If it goes from the
very smallest to the very highest, maybe it goes for everything in between.
So I tried the mass of the proton. Guess what the super force says?
Okay, I put in the mass. So in the super force being
mc square divided by that characteristic length, I put in the mass of the
proton, which which is like ten to the minus twenty seven kilograms. And
guess what I get. I get a characteristic length, and your ordered what
the Shuret Child radius for proton. So the proton is treated by the super
force as a black hole. No wonder the proton takes so long to decay.
If ever, that is an amazing equation. The super force equation will
one day be known by physics everywhere. I hope you know, and I
do not mind if they do read arrive it they call it their own.
But at least you know, somewhere in a footnote they say, you know,
some crack pad called Paise thought of this tool. You know, we're
not going to tell you. I know that you're sensitive as well about what
people call you, and I think that that's part of the vindication that I
want to go through with you as well, is that I tell you,
sir, I've been. I've been. I mean, we talk about blood,
tears, sweat, and misery of the mind and the soul of this.
Because the moment they called my work, and I understand, maybe I
understand, I'm not quite sure exactly why the drive wars on't called my papers,
the UFO patents, the UFO Mayvy patterns. The moment again, it
became a symbol of ridicule, and mainstream physicists would not even look at that
because again symbol of derision. And I understand why they changed the terminology to
UAP, but you shouldn't because we're talking about the history of so many people
that were involved in the subject matter, and for them and them alone,
we should leave that term. As is my opinion that you and UFO should
be unacknowledged. I agree with you in the UFO thing as well. And
I also don't want to link your work to UFO because it's really just science.
It's not necessarily related to UFOs, although there's obviously a connection there because
from what people see it can describe that as well. So you know,
that's why when we look at the description of my discussion with you, doesn't
mention that at all. Because what we're digging into here is the science,
right We're digging into quanta and macro unification. We're going to dig into superconductivity
here in a minute as well, and that's the stuff that I want to
learn about. The stuff. It's not fiction, it's just science. So
one quick question second about and I promise you not to interrupt again. Oh
you're fine your show here, sir. No, No, you're the start.
This is your first interview, so I should be a little more polite.
But this is my chance to say certain things and who knows, Maybe
I get a word from command shut and I can and this may be my
last who knows, who knows? Anything can happen the truth. But as
Angle take one said, I will never suicide myself. Okay, Now,
now the the the idea being on the second page of that paper, on
the second page of that paper, or the super force paper. Take a
good look at the way that I prove that this is the force of unification.
There's a remarkable formalism, very simple that the strong nuclear force divided by
the electromagnetic force is one divided by the define structure constant. It's usually I'm
your of one divided by one thirty seven, it's like point zero seven.
But anyway, and it's very interesting that when you actually take the decimal of
that one divided by one thirty seven and and do it in a calculator,
and you see what I talk about. It's as if the numbers become a
wave. It's as if the numbers it's it's a vibration of So it's it's
very strange. Just look at the way the numbers change and how it's trust
one virus by one thirty seven, and you'll see what I'm talking about,
now, what's what's truly okay? What was? Yeah? So so,
using that idea, I was able to show very simply that the strong nuclear
force equals the gravitational force at the plank scale equals the superforce, so that
the strongest of the forces that went off, the strong nuclear force when chapter
is in the order of ten to the minus fifteen meters uh so one central
media, and the gravitational force, which is the highest that we know off
hence the general relativity, the Einstein field equations and so forth. So those
two scales are at the plank scale, those two forces are equal and equal
to the superforce. The super force is a force of unification. And you
can actually find on that same page, very simple, with some rudimentary math,
something that I called in another paper conditional replacement technique, and one can
google it and see what I'm talking about. The CRT. Some people called
it at one point cathode ray tube. I just don't anyway, the conditional
replacement technique, if taken simple in that leaning equation, you can actually show
that in both the rock and the Shorten equations, the super force exists because
it's an energy gradient at the plant scale. So it's so simple. This
is why I love it, because I like simple mathematics that points to great
physics. That idea of coupling the two amazes. I understand that a lot
of people are fascinated by R equally pr and ads equal CFT and so forth,
and we can discuss this at one point in time. But I'm sorry
one mother Senna. We live in a desiter vacuum. As Eric Blinda once
pointed out, I'm pretty sure Juan will be very mad at me at this
point in time. But anyway, Lenny Suskin too, But I have great
respect by the way Lenny Suskin started out his staying as a plumber in Brooklyn.
Speaking of Joe the Plumber, Oh, I would love to have him
on the committee as well. He's one of these visual mathematicians. He believes
in geometries. That's a very interesting mind, the way his mind works,
Lenny's and he's like at a certain age, and yet I couldn't tell.
I mean, the man is is a giant. It's a cerebral giant,
you know. So a each advanceage doesn't mean a thing, just like pedigree
doesn't mean a thing. Why shouldn't the Joe the Plumber be able to even
publish in Archai, because most likely if you can publish in Archai, maybe
your paper will be seen in Science, Nature, Physical Review. Letters would
be nice, But anyway, that's a dream, all right. So I
just for the viewers, you know, when we talk about unifying quantum and
macro, I think I saw a question that was kind of helps for them
to understand. Do you believe that faster and light communication is possible based on
your equations that we talked about the super force? We have to be careful
to understand the nature of the medium within the same medium. So in other
words, I believe a medium speaks to a given light speed, most likely
having to do the index of refraction of that particular medium and also coupled with
the speed of light in free space. There's a very simple formula that you
can see that's a ratio. But anyway, so in other words, if
we able to modify the medium, it is quite possible that so cold faster
than the speed of life is peaceable, but within that given medium. No,
Einstein was correct. It is a quote on quote physical area, but
only only presented by the nature of the medium, that medium can be tenderized.
You can tenderize that to the point a wholest form if you put enough
energy density at that particular point in space and time. Huh. Cool,
So that I appreciate that answer. I think that helps out with the viewers
quite a bit. And I think the next thing we want to jump into
is superconductivity. So can you define superconductivity for the audience. And then in
addition to that, you talk about high energy densities, can room temperature superconductors
achieve those densities? And how so? Okay, that second one I would
rather than not discuss for reasons that I've said before. It the first one.
It's in the theoretical realm. Oh, speaking of which I would love
I believe Leon Cooper is still alive, and Stephanie Alexander knows him. I
would love him on that committee too. And we're talking about the BCS theory
of super conductivity. We're talking about one of the I should not use the
term gods to describe men, especially since Hubris may be greatly involved. So,
but he is one of the giants of super conductivity, and I believe
he's still alike. And also Brian Josephson SQUI super conducting quantum interference devices.
Oh my goodness, the stuff that we can do that. But anyway,
so that your name are really smart. So both Brian Joseph and Lean Cooper
are more than welcome on that committee. I would love to hear. Oh
my goodness, they're such giants. But cover meat, cover meat has to
be there. I mean, this is a man. This is the father
of true semi my opinion of semiconductor technology. But not only that he has
such ideas, for example, even in gravitation. But because yes, the
pedigree is an electrical engineer, even as a professor at call Tech, that
man is not being heard properly by the community that supposedly is not part of
science. Should not have limits, creat sir, So what's your definition of
superconductivity for the audience? Superconductivity? Well, I output an electrically charged super
fluid could be a superconductor. So the idea being that it's possible that we
can actually slow photons in a superconductor. That's interesting, isn't it? Yeah?
Very interesting. It talks to the ability of medium. Now, a
superconduct itself is really basically zero resistance as the electron flow goes through a certain
me say, a wire that's called a wire for lack of a better term,
even though the way electricity actually moves along the wire rather than through it
is very questionable. But anyway, I should not go there because I'm already
called the crack. But I don't need so. Even though there was a
very interesting podcast, and I'm very fassium as to that illusion that. Okay,
I'm diverging, I'm taking so many so the whole okay. And there's
one more thing that defines a superconductor. That's the miceners effect. That's the
ability of the of the superconductor to actually, I believe it actually forms a
magnetic field of itself, of its own, some sort of eddy currents that
actually form on the superconductor, and something called the London penetration depth. See
a magnetic field will actually penetrate the superconductor. Interesting it see that's the beauty
of it. It acts sally goes to the London penetration that but what it
does it forms edit current which talked to a magnetic field opposite that repels the
magnetic field that's put upon the superconductor. So yeah, but there's a London
penetration that and some and you can. I actually I remember that I wrote
a paper I think the room temperature the the AI double A side tech speaks.
It was a presentation that was based on a paper that I wrote that
I presented at a AI double A side tech twenty nineteen. And please make
sure you post that because slides four to slide nine is extremely important, I
even in one slide actually solve the vacuum catastrophe. You know the whole idea.
You know that we get one hundred and twenty orders of magnitude difference between
the quantum realm and how how is that possible? Well, it speaks to
the idea that maybe we're not dealing with playing lambs. He will do with
some space cells of a different dimension and terror herts frequencies, saying that's some
but anyway, yeah, that's as far as I go. I should not
gotta say more than that. So well, I got more than that might
broach even further all of a sudden, I tell you call me so the
next one that was related. I don't know if you can dig into this
because I heard on that of Everything podcast too, you're mentioning that Bose Einstein
content stants can allow for room temperature superconductive effects. Is that something you can
elaborate on or is that also kind of pushing it too far? That's more,
that's more the the okay, uh, to understand how the room temperatures
for conductor that I'm talking about, which is an active room. See,
I believe that maybe one way to solve supercompuctivity at room temperature is not necessarily
by material properties to actually find for example, LK ninety nine and so for
you know, the whole idea of finding a specific material cop barium strengthium type.
Now, maybe it has to do with a way that you can influence
something that is already a superconductor at very low temperature, but make it a
super conductor at much higher temperature, so raising the critical temperature. And actually,
uh, there's a great paper out there still on archive, and one
can google it. Hopefully it's still on Hopefully they haven't taken it down.
There's a lot of concerted effort to make my work look like pseudoscience, so
so someone google it fast before it goes. It's written by doctor Victor Lacno
u V I K T O R. Lacno or Victor with a C.
I'm not sure, but l A K h n O lackno. And he's
from the Russian Academy form of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He uh.
He wrote a paper called something the Road or the Way too High and room
temperature super conductivity something of their nature used to be on archive. But in
reference ten, he actually speaks to the idea that the way that I do
it, the way he believes that that my idea and the room temperature superconductor
is possible, is that what I'm really doing is forming a Bose Einstein condensate
and then actually moving the condensate because of a certain vibration within that feel Because
and you can actually read his paper and see the last paragraph and he references
me. It's the only actually the only, I believe, the only paper
out there, you know, in the academics quote unquote academic community that actually
references that particular idea. And I think he's got he's got quite an he's
got a point. Somebody read that carefully. It's a last page and he
references my pattern in reference ten. I believe still remember that. Yeah,
he actually wrote a book recently on high temperatures for conductivity as well. But
anyway, I digress. Sorry, so no, you're fine, because that's
actually I think you just said the last thing. The next thing I was
going to say, which is I heard you say that in a previous interview
that extremely low temperatures can create the thosignes on contents, say, which can
allow things to move as one, the electrons potentially if I'm saying that correctly,
and that they might even a microscopic quantum coherence, the idea that it's
possible under certain conditions. For example, what's a superconductor. Superconductor is really,
in the words of Phil Anderson, the idea of emergence. Now,
phil Anderson Nobel Prize, was a great mind. He god, I believe
he is. He's deceased, but he at one point he was talking.
I forget exactly how he tackled that problem. Anyway, I digress. Look
into the work of phil Anderson and his idea of emergence and how he links
it to something called macroscopic quantum coherence. How how how a physical object of
classical size can behave as a quantum entity under certain conditions In macroscopic quantum decoherence,
as opposed to decoherence. Exactly decoherent. That that is the some people
think, for example, the gravitational field could be a decoherence method by which
something that should reset or should have a quantum mechanical Actually it was Roger Penrose
to mention that. But anyway, the whole idea is decoherence. Uh it
it's it's one. As a matter of fact, look into slides four to
nine. It's in there. Look into slides for four to nine in in
my AI double A Side Tech twenty nineteen presentation. It's in there described quantum
coherence to a t. And as a matter of fact, if you have
it up, read what I what I write in that particular slide, like,
read the whole thing. It's it's uh. I still remember being in
that room. I actually got a standing ovation for that slide. There were
absolutely I mean people, was I felt so good being able to to to
talk to my peers and getting some feedback there was not so negative a nature
reading. And actually, do you know who presented before me in that same
room, Robert Zubrin. We actually met with the great guy too. But
okay, you go ahead and read that please, Yeah, because I actually
I think I quoted this when I was posting these slides on Twitter. Because
there were so many slides, I had to break them up into fours.
And part of it was saying that this is a vacuum that has undergone macroscopic
quantum coherence locally around the craft. As a result, the craft experiences suction
into the conditioned vacuum. Another part of it says that this may be the
very condition to achieve a state of macroscopic quantum coherence the idea. Idea being
that we never leave the system. Let the system achieve thermodynamic equilibrium by constantly
delaying the onset of relaxation to the equilibrium. Hence, the production of maximum
entropy is delayed. The system may violently react by generating anomalist emergent phenomena such
as, but not limited to, inertial mass reduction, which we're going to
talk about here in a minute. I think, and this speaks to what
I call the preg Gene effect. This is the work of Ilia Pregogene.
You can say in a way that the Vice effect is the engineering of the
Pregogene effect, what I call the Preggiene effect. His a Nobel Prize.
I believe in nineteen seventy three. Wrong. I remember that his Nobel Prize
lecture paper being written. I think December seventy three. But anyway, he
also wrote a book called Order from Chaos very or Out of Chaos very interesting.
He was, I believe, chemistry, but Iliya Prigojin was an incredible
mind, and he basically his idea was the ordering of what he called dissipated
structures, that order that chaos can be ordered under certain conditions. The idea
being you're dealing with a non linear medium, for example of plasma, you
drive it far from equilibrium, hence acceleraery vibration or an accelerated spin, and
then you have a constant electromagnetic energy going through it, like a flax of
some kind, and you're able to get these dissipated structures. I think he's
the example or Bernard's something called Bernard cells. Bernard, I'm not it's French.
I should know better since I took so many of them. I believe
it's Bernard. The whole idea is, for example, on a thin plate,
if you have a layer of oil very thin, and you hit the
plate from underneath the metal plate, so you need conductivity there to make sure
you know, if it's a dialector of this thing will never get hit.
So the whole idea is they form these in time, they form hexagonal cells
and something that event that begins chaotic, the movement becomes orders. And he
used that in his December ninety an incredible. I suggest everybody go and try
to find the Nobel Prize lecture by Ilia Prigosin. I believe it was nineteen
seventy three, something about time fluctuations structure. Anyway, very interesting paper.
I think this may be similar, and let me know if it is or
not. But you mentioned driving the plasma from equilibrium that will be in the
self organized and that the electrons will be going to move and lockstep in one
giant matter wave as well. Yes, I actually use the phrase that another
great used, volfkan Italy. I absolutely like love Profs the only one to
reply kindly to my emails like he. You know, even though he would
not support my paper and archives, he gave some very good reasons for it.
And I mean, I'm one hundred percent sure that if I would have
kept nudging him and stuff, eventually he's that kind of person. I truly
see people like that. People like that should get Nobel prizes, not people
that ride others and make fun of them. Call them pranks and track pots.
Please come on. I've had similar experiences with academia, and the ones
I respect. I'm with you are the ones that people that are willing to
talk to anyone right not regardless of their pedigree. Is profess people that humble
themselves, people that don't consider themselves to be soothsayers. So those are types
of people the price for BC by the way, yes he showed it.
I think by combination of something welled evaporated cooling and laser cooling, you can
actually oo adams and lasers. Isn't that cool? That's really actually a lot
of stuff you can do with lasers, especially with plasmas. But anyway,
I'm gonna I'm gonna press you on this next one. Then, So is
it feasible to work with electrically charged solids? Then? I know we've talked
all about a lot about plasmas, but what about solids in general? Any
theories they're hypothetically speaking, it's possible on theer certain conditions, but you need
electric charges on your of cool ambs, and it's not easy. You can
use pelatrons and something. All teletrons are a modern version of something called bandergraph
generators, So you can actually get high charges on a particular metallic substrate.
But it's it's it's not simple, and it's not easy to keep that charge
from discharging to the medium. Sometimes you need high preciures as it's how should
I say? It's complicated. So I prefer simple things, and I think
the best way to do this is with plasmas. Now, now, I'm
not saying that plasmas are easy to subdue. As a matter of fact,
they're a very interesting animals. I sometimes think plasmas have consciousness of their own,
but I digress. Yeah, they have like almost like a double layer.
You have to study what the hunts out Phane thought of plasma. It's
very interesting. There's another great anthony perat. The whole idea is that our
universe is more than nineteen nine point nine nine percent plasma. Yeah, so
okay, and hence the boussard ram jet the Holy But then, anyway,
I'm digressing on so many levers. I'm sure that the people who are being
quoted in reference will appreciate all of the shout outs that you've given them.
So that's why I don't want to slow you down at all. So I
mean, and next the next thing. It kind of feeds into what we
were talking about your slides, which is and as much as you can speak
to it, how does inertial mass reduction work? And what does it mean
for the capabilities of both technology and propulsion in general? Uh, it works
the way that I expressed it in my public domain. What I can speak
to even on an experimental level is, for example, the one thing,
in my opinion, is most important, most important, is to create these
holes in space. That's why when you when you show I you know,
I wanted to make sure that the person that I had the interview with was
actually you look, this is my confessional. So I actually went to a
podcast called The Confessionals, I think Merco Media or something really good, tremendous,
really good dude too, that dude, but anyway, very very nice
guy. Uh. And and by the way, you you come across a
man, you come across really good in that podcast problem check it out.
When I saw when I saw what those lobs did, the local points,
the locus of points that they formed, and the moment I actually actually slowed
down and started because I actually saw one of them, actually a couple of
went in front of the nose of the aircraft, and this thing was almost
free four. So we're talked about very high speed. And I kept on
thinking they're trying to form of locus, like almost like a spherical bubble around
the air craft. And then I thought more and more. I said,
Oh my god, they're actually what these three orbs are doing, the depositing
energy at a particular even though it goes with the spacecraft. Still, I
think they're moving fast enough to have a locus locus of points that you can
say it's like a spherical bubble that deposits more and more energy within that particular
section of space time to create this breaking of the shwingle. And if you
do that, you create a hole in space time. And when I saw
what I saw, I didn't anticipate. When I saw that thing, the
hole it formed, and then I almost saw like a ring that formed around
the hole. It was like a refraction of the of the superfluor of nature
of I said, oh my god, this is the perciffect. Yeah,
And then I had to prove myself down, They would definite believe that most
likely, you know, Ashton will have to go for absolute health to prove
that this is not you know, Oh my goodness, Well we're going through
it, sir, We're going slowing down. I wish you'd be absolute best
luck in this because this is the best, the best experimental proof that the
quote unquote police effect is real. So we have to have a follow up
then, for sure, where we take a look at the videos together and
go through I think the audience would absolutely love that. For today though,
I just want to stay focused on the science, just because you know,
I think we want to indicate you and your science here and I think we've
done a great job so far of explaining how it can be practical and real,
right as opposed to the detractors who want to dismiss it. Now,
if you have this inertial mass reduction craft, uh, do you know what
would that look like to the observer as they're watching that move and they produce
a field or how does that work? There? Have you ever seen Star
Wars? Oh yeah, I could see your shirt by the way, but
yeah, the eggs wing. I pride myself all the way part of the
resistance baby, you know, anyway, the rebel alliance. But I've always
been truly a rebel at heart. But is it gonna look like the hyperspace
joke? Say that? Sorry anyway? No, no, no, I
meant anyway, there's nothing wrong with being a slave. No, I'm kidding.
But anyway, well, as long as our existence depends on others,
we are all slaves. Whether we say so or not, it's a whole
different thing. But anyway, let's call ourselves rebels while we're still yes,
sir, absolutely, Okay. Now do you remember how the I think they
were called what were they called the the the imperial cruisers? Yeah? Do
you remember how all of a sudden they would just vanish as if a whole
was formed into That's a exactly what happens with that trianglear structure that I represent
in the past. That's that's how I envisioned it, and that's why when
I saw what I saw in that video, I said, oh my god,
but it's very interesting. Uh. And You're one hundred percent right there
have to be a ton of and I'm one hundred percent sure these were some
sort of collision avoiding software there. All I remember is that like inside the
orb because you also showed the thermographs there was some sort of a propulsion plan,
some sort of a power plan because it was a different there was something
going on in the middle of that or but anyway, yeah, I digress,
sorry about that would happened. Yeah, so okay, so it would
look potentially like the hyperspace jump. I think that's really cool. Yes,
you actually just answer one of my other questions was coming up, which was,
you know, do you think that these crafts could be there would have
to be somebody inside them or could they be remote controlled? You know,
I think that's an interesting question, right. You know my opinion, both
can make this. I think you can make it into an interstellar travel.
I think I think you can do both. But I think it's far easier
to do the first of all the laws of human life. Nobody wants to
deal with it. Goodness gracious, so so much sometimes, so much better
to have these autonomous artificial intelligent agents. Again, this means if if it's
true what we saw, that means that AI is not a new thing at
all. But anyway, ten years ago, I aggress, I digress way
too much. Oh, I have another theory on something the triarchy of sentience.
Eventually with talk about it. It's very interesting. Artificial intelligence, for
example, in my opinion, you can test whether something has become an artificial
general intelligence by basically seeing if it can generate given say, textbook data.
So we're not talking about stuff that just pulled from the Internet, but the
stuff that's pull from physics manuals, something that's been experimentally proven, So using
textbook data. Given a certain computational power level, I believe as long as
the AI, the AI agent can generate an original concept, it becomes HI
super intelligence is not very far off. So I anyway, I'm not I'm
digressing on so many levels. But another thing, for example, the super
force speaks to super density, and eventually our talk on that too, something
called so super force super bang because of the super density and super intelligence.
Again, I call it the triarchy of creation. Ah. You know,
after all, I'm a crack bat, right, So since my Hubres level
has been you know, inflated to the max, well why not break the
shoeing a little bit? Why not just change the whole world? Because that's
what I do here, That's what I think we're looking at. If you
can prove if you can prove that that video is for Ashton, that is
a Nobel Prize. Brother. If I, if I was the Stop Home
community, I freaking immediately give you a Nobel Price in imagery or something or
I don't know, like creative thinking, or I'll just take a Pultzer.
You know, I don't need a Nobel Prize. But yeah, that's only
you know, like you, I also have to say at this point that
I would never hurt myself and yeah to do anything like that either. Just
want to make sure that that's not on the record here just case. Yes,
neither Ashton or I would ever suicide ourselves, thank you, never,
never any circumstances. So also I just want to dig into a little bit
kind of what you just mentioned, which kind of takes into the stuff we
were talking about. Is in your patents you talk about non linear medium using
a plasma resonating inside a cavity related to microwaves, and then you also say
that you can convert high frequency UH electromagnetic waves into gravitational waves. Can you
speak to that at all? That has to do with another paper I put
out, and I think the Society of Automotive engineers, remind me to send
you that paper. I also have I think the it's like starts to zero
four zero that. But anyway, it was published in the It's It's It's
a paper that was needed to to get the patent. That was incredible though
that that office action was a first. I mean they actually approved it as
a first high high frequency gravitation wight generator. It could be because prior to
this there were shown to be I mean, we'll talk about the genius of
Kip Torn here, you know, and and very bearish and ligo for goodness
sake, I mean, you know, the great experimental and theoretical Kip Torn
of course, just like Penrose got it for black holes. But anyway,
and and and by the way, Sir Roger Penrose or you should be called
Lord in my opinion, so Lord Penrose, if you're ever watching this,
there are no such thing as spacetime singularities. I'm sorry, I disagree with
you. We can have an argument on it. I think uh Abby Ashtrakar
is correct, as in, there's a quantum bounce, so in other words,
it never goes to zero. It goes to something on your of the
plant density, which talks to the super density. But anyway, that's a
whole different ball game. We'll talk about the super density one day because it
talks to the super bang, not the Big bang, the super all right,
all right, Yeah, So I've got a few more questions that are
kind of similar to stuff we talked about. I don't know if some of
it's going back, you know, And I think I've heard something on your
Theory of Everything podcast where you talked about there being a thin insulator regarding your
inertial mass reduction craft. Does this actually have to be a physical element or
can this be something that can be produced by a field of some sort as
well? What are your thoughts on that. It's a very good question,
sir. I'll leave it. I love it. That's why I love when
I get that answer, honestly, because the same reason why I send in
freedom of information requests, like I don't care what the answer is, because
no matter what the answer is, I glean information off of it as an
investigator. Now, I guess the next part too, is kind of related
to what we're just talking about with uh, you know, not to go
into the videos that we were talking about, but the effect that what we
see there in the videos is you mentioned. I think with the pairing up
of electrons causing potentially a suction effect or potentially creating a void, that me
create the suction effect in the vacuum. So it's exactly what you see.
It's almost like a black hole. Yeah, I guess that's my question.
See, oh my goodness, does it matter like how you define it.
I have a feeling between you and I, I have a feeling that every
black hole, for every black hole, there's a white hole, so it's
kind of like a warm hole kind of. So you have the ability to
actually transport from one point to another, so for example, from going from
point A to point C without actually going for point B. Yeah, I
think I don't really understand what the quantum vacuum is all about. And I
have a feeling there there's so much more to physics that I think we're still
in our infancy. We think we almost know it all. I think physics
it's almost I would say, three maybe four months old. It's a long
time till this it becomes an adult. Basically. I think JFK mentions that
too, is that the greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds,
and I look back at that and I think that we think we're so
advanced, but we are still potentially cavemen compared to where we could possibly be,
is my view. And it's funny you bring up the black hole white
hole situation. That's always something I've wondered about too, because what we see
in physics is symmetry a lot, right, the must have an entrance,
why not an exit? Interesting? Yeah? And so when you're generating this
void in the space of time continuum, which I believe you argue with these
certain energy densities getting to that, would this potentially energize particles outside of the
void? Do you think or any thoughts of theories on what might happen there?
And do you think it would at least look like a black hole?
I mean, I could speculate. I can give you my speculation. Yeah,
please, I think it would be a whole local phenomena. I have
a fling almost nothing maybe something that uh, I'm not sure whether for example,
the clouds, because you mentioned their clouds, like where those clouds in
any way? Could you see the move in any way? And I'm I
have a feeling that the effect would be highly local and it's as if a
portal is open within a fabric of some sorts, but somehow this fabric has
the ability to recongeal almost spontaneously. Weird again. The whole idea is that
once you remove this energy density, this thing just comes back. And that's
why super intelligence. I truly believe what we're dealing with the energy the universe
is a sentience. It's a sentient being. And and I told you we
better be careful what we do with our planet because you know what antibodies are.
Yeah, they fight back right against anything that it doesn't unwanted things,
right. Yeah, Well that that makes me think about some other theories that
I wouldn't mind talking with you on another podcast as well, which is into
more of the you know, what are the implications of you know, this
advanced technology, where it came from, and what it would mean for you
know, lots of other philosophical approaches, but we can save that for another
time. That's another thing. Physics and philosophy must be britt again. We
must marry these two. The divorce that when between physics and philosophy should have
never been allowed. I believe physics has so much to gain from remarrying philosophy,
and I think Colo Rebelli others like him, Lee Smolen, oh man,
that's a physics. I would love him in the committee, both of
them. But I think Lie Smolan is taking a Canadian citizenship, and you
know, there's this so in other words, the people that would be in
this committee would have to be United States citizens due to certain things I would
say, you know, and I'm pretty sure the committee would be Unfortunately,
I would love to have a televised but I have a feeling, you know,
my better is my superiors. When you know, I would agree maybe
to a skiff conference rather than anyway. Yeah, I'm not gonna go there.
Yeah, I'm glad I don't have any NDAs not to worry about those
types of things. But I understand the quickly situation that you might be inserts.
So again, I just appreciate that you're you able to talk freely about
this type of stuff. And yeah, you know, it's just that I
was super furious when I saw the changes they did to the Wikipedia page.
I mean, for goodness, a pseudo science that's like, you know,
vomiting in my face and then spitting on it too, you know, I
mean what else. Excuse my language, you know I grew up. This
is not for children at a tapestry of obscenity second to none. Yeah,
So I have only a couple of questions. I was thinking maybe we would
open it up to some live chat questions if I see them out there.
So one last thing that I've been curious about, which is uh and it
kind of goes into the U A P phenomenon, but it's definitely related to
your scientific approach is do you think this craft or your craft that you have
kind of patented, can go through solid matter or are there limitations to it?
What are your thoughts on that? Because I know that they talk about
multi trand like different being able to go through different mediums, right, water,
air space, what about solid mass? Right? Let me just say
there are no impossible, just conditional possibilities. Under certain conditions, everything and
anything is possible a trick and this is where it all comes is how to
engineer those conditions. So in a way I've answered your question. In a
way I haven't, But that's I think that you know, one of my
favorite characters and and and and and shows, it wasn't It wasn't the American
version of House of Cards. It was a British version. Uh, his
name was Francis Urkert. If you it's pretty interesting how the initials goes,
and just to say you may possibly say so, I could not possibly come
and I don't know, but the thing stuck in my mind. I watched
the American version until the last. Unfortunately I don't mention the name or you'll
get Yeah, I don't want to get us removed here. It's a total
loss though, because oh my god, it was great until then, remember
the usual suspects. What I mean, who anyway, great movie. So
one thing I want to ask or to say as well, is just kind
of a general statement I had before we june into questions, is that you
know, if your daughter's watching, I want her to know that you are
a great man. And all the anyone who says negative stuff about you,
they can come talk to me, because that's nonsense. You know, just
for you. Your dad is an amazing person. He's going to be a
historic figure potentially, potentially even in the history books. So ignore all the
nonsense that the haters would say. They don't mean anything, they don't even
matter, honestly, And that's the way you deal with them is you don't
let it get to you. So that's what I wanted to say to her.
If she's watching. God bless you, sir, God bless you for
that. Thank you very much for saying this. Yeah, she she she
tries. She she tried so hard. One time I found a crying and
she was reading and I said, please, oh my God, read it
of all things. I mean, you don't read that stuff, you know.
But anyway, yeah, she is. She's gonna be twelve soon,
enow. But still, you know, she she's a sensitive kid. I
wish she took it more from her mother, but yeah, you know,
she she took it from me unfortunately. So yeah, she's a great kid.
Thank you for that. God bless you. If you have any children,
same goes, do you appreciate it? Appreciate it? I don't appreciate
that. Anyway, you were able to prove this, you will definitely get
a prize. And again, let us let us reiterate neither Ashton, Forbes
nor Sell but would ever suicide ourselves. Thank you and yeah for me.
It's about the same name as my podcast Hard Truths, right, These are
hard truths that are hard for people to accept, but they are true,
and we still have to look, even though we don't want to accept it,
we have to look. I've got a couple of questions from the audience
here, if you're ready to go, I don't. One of the first
ones here is they want to ask you about the relationship between pious effect and
exotic vacuum objects. Apparently they go by a number of different variety of names.
Are you familiar with those? And yes, yes, that's a very
interesting Uh, the whole idea of super capitation, the whole idea of sono
luminescence, and what was the name of that gentleman, I remember reading some
papers on him. He was he was quite a quite an engineer. Shame
on me for for now remembering the the ideos. If they can put that
in the in the in the live stream, that'd be great, you know,
so you can. But anyway, I'm not quite sure there's similarities.
I think mine is a more general form of it. Mine is really the
engineering of the prevosion effect. That's what it is. I think that's a
best way to say it. It really deals with taking things far from equilibrium.
And and again, the whole idea of rapid acceleration transient. The whole
idea that you don't that you don't have the time differential of your acceleration is
non zero. That's very important. And don't forget equation seven. Please do
not forget equation seven in the I Triple E TPS paper that the plasma compression
fusion device. It speaks to something very interesting, an energy runway. That
that uh an exponential increase with time and accelerating vibrational frequency. Read, be
very careful when you look at that equation that that that says a lot of
things. So I hope I answered some of that. Yeah, I hope
I. But definitely God what was his name now? Really drives me crazy.
He quite a character, an incredible, incredible mind. He also went
for help, uh hm for people to see. Shame on me for for
forgetting that man's name. Really God, So there's the answer for that,
no problem. So somebody else another question which they wanted to ask about your
thoughts on Er equals e p r uh what are your thoughts? Eteinrosen The
Einstein Rosen bridge equals Einstein Podowski Rosen. The whole idea the quantumental and dangleman
really speaks to this bridge between these two particles. But think what particles are
the super FORWL says that the proton can act as a black hole. So
if so, why not the electron. Maybe the electron is also a black
hole. Maybe the old particles act as black holes and as a as a
matter of fact, maybe that's why we see these quote unquote particles not this
integrating. For example, the proton, the decay time is on the order
of ten to the thirty forces. I don't know exactly the unit of measure,
but even seconds, it would be horrendously large. So but most likely
the proton will not decay unless you do something. Again, I am not
sure exactly how the super force speaks speaks to, for example, the Higgs
field. I think, for example, the Higgs field speaks of a different
scale. I think the super force is so fundamental it exists at the plank
scale. It actually derives everything. Put it this way, it is the
force to rule them all, one force to rule them all, one force
to find them, one force to bring them all. And in the darkness
behind them. And it's interesting they're talk about dark energy. Maybe that's what
the darkness reports to. But anyway, okay, that's interesting. Yeah,
some other stuff. Let's see what people have. Well, people want to
first say that love you back. You know, so everybody's a big fan
of you in the chat right now. They're great people. Thank you.
Want to know what gives you hope for a better world. I think that's
an interesting philosophical question. What gives you hope for better world? I I
you know, I was I. I had to turn the TV off in
the morning. I was, I was hoping for some better news. And
again, physics and politics should not make so I am totally apolitical. Consider
me to I'm okay. But I will say this and listen carefully, and
I will say this in both Romanian and Russian ascultabin and now I will say
what I have to say. Credo in batrem omnipotent me. He'll see it.
Dale eloho mele how long bismillah irahman Rahim Inshallah Mohammad Aizuli, different languages,
different religions, yet signifying all is one, one is all. Unless
we come together, we shall fall apart. Unification. That's what all these
languages speak to, the one truth. And you know what that truth is?
Why can't we just come together? This is the only way we have
a chance. A unification of civilization will give us the ability to go to
the stars. Otherwise that chance will never come. Not the way, not
the patron. Where are That's all I have to say. Awesome. I
think they also figured out who the doctor was, doctor Ken Shoulders. I
think is it was on top of it for you? What a great Oh
my god, remarkable, yes, remarkable mind. As a matter of fact,
you know this whole idea of the negative energy that you know, the
whole idea of the formation of the whole for which this thing is sucked.
Yeah, that's that's the science of someone called I God. I forget he
used to go by the name David Frowning, but I believe his name was
Herman Herman David Frowning. I think David was his middle name. But David
Frowning, doctor Frowning, University of Adelaide, I believe Australia. Very interesting
man. You have to look. I think in one of my papers I
actually cite him and I I regarded him along with people like John Brandenburg,
Uh, Paul Murad he he he recently passed from cancer. These were great,
great people. These are great people. Some of them are still alive.
But I doctor Throning, and and and mister Murad are not. Mister
Brandenburg, thank goodness, still with us. He is a good man.
He should be listened to tremendously. Is GEM theory G E M. Gravito
electro gravitic electromagnetic theory GEM G E M should be looked into. Absolutely fascinating.
And he also talks to the pointing back that I mean he was able
to actually show the the the mass of the Higgs particle because we're really talking
to the Higgs field. There's not that while the whole idea of the God
particle, please, they're not such his particles, the fluctuations in fields.
What exists is the But anyway, again digressing, Sorry, next question,
No, I think we're drying up. But I have a question for you
as well, which is another physicist I've been talking to has a theory called
dilation theory, and I think that the way he would describe is the time
as a fluid symmetry, and that you can essentially take gravity out of the
equation and there's another way to simplify the mathematics. I think similar to what
you do achieves the same perhaps conclusion be those are out doing it a slightly
different way, and the reason why I liked his theories in general. I'm
just curiously your thoughts on them is that the idea is the less mass,
the faster things, the faster time flows. The more mass, the slower
time flows. It's pretty cool, right, time dilation time I wish I
understand. I think of time as some sort of energy. Feel I wish
I understood more. For example, gravity responds to time. Why and again
we'll talk about physical time here. We're not talking about the time as we
understand measured by clocks, because remember, clocks themselves are made out of what
atoms, and atoms respond to the quantum, vacuum and the manipulation they're off.
So you have to be very careful by saying, oh, there's no
such thing as physical time. You know today is equal to more? Please,
I don't think we really understand time what it really means. And since
we don't understand time, how can you say you understand space time the unification
of the same, right. Yeah, so we have to be careful to
to That's why I'm saying we are only in the infancy of physics, maybe
two three year month old compared to what other Ay, yes, definitely not
an octogenarian. Yeah. So I want to go ahead and thank you here.
I'll let you go ahead and say you have last words. I want
to let you kind of say whatever you want to say. It can be
you know, anything that's coming. If you want to say one thing and
one thing or I hope we have other interviews. I truly I respect you,
sir. I respect you one hundred percent, and I honor your your
your investigative approach, your research, and your ability not to give up.
That's what it's all about. No matter how much crap, how much fecal
matter, they fraud you just every now and then deflect you know, yes,
smells. What can you do? Keep on going, achieve that objective
and trust me Ashton, if you're able to prove this. Wow. Yeah,
and again stating this for the audience, neither Ashton Forbes nor whatever suicide
ourselves. Thank you, ash I did have one last question too, which
I answer because you work for Space Force. Now is that is that correct?
Uh? Or with them? Since I mean we have people, I
sir, to me too much. I don't I can stand lies lies to
me. You know, like this whole idea that lies laid of lies upon
lies becoming accepted truths. For God's it, It's just it's just an a
total and a them I like, like sacrilege to me. So I'm not
gonna lie. No, I don't work for the Space Force right now.
I work in the United States, Nate, got it, Okay, but
yeah, okay, yeah, no problem. Well in that case, then
I yea, I would just pluse out and say, you know, this
is the Hard Truth Podcast Number one. This is a big one. I
mean, I respect you more than you respect me, as much as you
may think that we each have our own frame of reference and perhaps it's a
you know, balancing act, but you're one of my favorite people on the
planet. I've been talking with you offline as well, and you know,
I want nothing more than to vindicate you and your science that you've put out
there. And you know, I want you to stay strong as well,
because I know that you have been getting attacked and hopefully this podcast went to
some degree to you know, have people take you seriously, which they should
absolutely. I really need a committee. I need a committee of highly credible,
highly credited scientist Nobel prize winners. We talk about Lee Smollen, we
talk about Seth Lloyd, we talk about Brian Keating, We're talking about even
Eric Weinstein. Yeah, I mean, why not. Even though he's not
of the correct physics pedigree, his idea of geometric unity is quite interesting,
even though some papers were written against it. Please, you know, everybody
should have some say. But again, give me a committee of highly credible
people, and in one hour, I promise you, one hour, I
can prove to them that I at least know what I'm talking about, at
least that I'm correct and at least partially correct. And if not, sir,
I promise never to do a podcast again, never to even like publish
one more paper. Well, between you and I, Between you and I,
it's not happening anyway. So it's like I'm getting you, I'm I'm
getting so many rejections. I just stopped, you know, Like now I
just go for for pre prints because in my opinion, it's almost as good
as you know, as long as the server survives and you're able to That's
why I asked you. Please show that paper to everyone you know, just
send it up, because it's like a domino effect. Even if the service
gets shut down here, somebody will have that paper and somebody will say,
damn, this crap pot wasn't such a crap pot after all. But anyway,
so do you want to plug anything as well? That aain somebody brought
that up. Anything you wanna plug? You have a Twitter? Do you
have any place where people? No, I'm totally off social media? Oh
my goodness, are you kidding me? And that again that that thing of
the I think between you and I, the having social media is conducive to
that thing that we call it anyway, So yeah, yeah, no,
no, no, no, no, absolutely, So I just want to
say, please also go on Kurtgei Mongol's Theories of every People. Go to
Tim Ventura interviews, also Project Unity, Jay Anderson, Oh incredible dude,
And don't forget Jeremy Riz Alien Scientists a man, very interesting and with that
group of people that those two dudes, Jerremiah the Engineer and Michael Peron.
He did a thing with Tim Ventura and LK ninety nine. Watch whoa that
he's a real material scientist. I was watching that. Yeah, okay closely,
So yeah, sale's going to be on the Alien podcast. Are the
Alien the Scientist stream next week, so guys check that out for sure.
I'm sure it'll be a great follow up to what we've been doing here as
well. I just want to thank you one more last time. Style.
I couldn't be more appreciative, and we can chat for a few minutes offline
here, but thank you very much, Chat and everybody who's on here today,
everyone who's there on the podcast. This was the very first inaugural of
the Hard Truths podcasts.