My Despised World

Divided Argument

After some inevitable self-flagellation for our lengthy hiatus, we catch up on some recent news and debate SCOTUS ethics. We then talk about implications of the Harvard/UNC affirmative action case, revisit Mallory v. Norfolk Southern, and break down the latest case captioned "United States v. Texas." 

2023-07-21 115 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

Will: [laughs] We can get a paper out of this, I think. Make this a [unintelligible project.
Dan: My guess is not just because I actually don't think these cases come up are that important. As of right now, there's very few states that even have these kinds of consent to general jurisdiction by registration schemes. I think that they used to be more common. Seems like they don't really happen very much. I don't know how many times, how often, I'm not a [unintelligible and maybe Ashley will tell us how many suits there are out in the world that rely on a statute like this. Are there people filing thousands of suits in Pennsylvania against railroads that do business elsewhere, railroads that happen to do business there? I don't know. [crosstalk] I mean, I guess and I didn't see-- Justice Barrett doesn't really get into it, right?

Chapters

No chapters available.