Podcast Short: Exploring Endophytes for Healthier Plants with Maizie Koentopp

Regenerative Agriculture Podcast

This is the first time we've had a high schooler on the podcast! Maizie Koentopp, a 9th grader in Chicago, conducted a simple yet elegant experiment on buckwheat plants. Motivated by her father's urban farming work and her own concern about climate change, Maizie wanted to test the effect of endophytic bacteria on plant development as an alternative to harmful agrochemicals. She compared seeds inoculated with AEA's BioCoat Gold™ to a non-inoculated control, and found that inoculated seeds (in both sterilized and non-sterilized soil) grew faster, had higher survival rates, and developed more root hairs. If others in Maizie's generation share her curiosity, poise, and scientific rigor, then our future is in good hands."

Additional Resources To read more about her research, click here.

About John Kempf John Kempf is the founder of Advancing Eco Agriculture (AEA). A top expert in biological and regenerative farming, John founded AEA in 2006 to help fellow farmers by providing the education, tools, and strategies that will have a global effect on the food supply and those who grow it.

Through intense study and the knowledge gleaned from many industry leaders, John is building a comprehensive systems-based approach to plant nutrition – a system solidly based on the sciences of plant physiology, mineral nutrition, and soil microbiology.

Support For This Show & Helping You Grow Since 2006, AEA has been on a mission to help growers become more resilient, efficient, and profitable with regenerative agriculture.

AEA works directly with growers to apply its unique line of liquid mineral crop nutrition products and biological inoculants. Informed by cutting-edge plant and soil data-gathering techniques, AEA's science-based programs empower farm operations to meet the crop quality markers that matter the most.

AEA has created real and lasting change on millions of acres with its products and data-driven services by working hand-in-hand with growers to produce healthier soil, stronger crops, and higher profits.

Beyond working on the ground with growers, AEA leads in regenerative agriculture media and education, producing and distributing the popular and highly-regarded Regenerative Agriculture Podcast, inspiring webinars, and other educational content that serve as go-to resources for growers worldwide.

Learn more about AEA's regenerative programs and products: https://www.advancingecoag.com

2025-10-02 17 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

1
00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:01,620
Hi, friends, this is John.

2
00:00:01,740 --> 00:00:02,799
Welcome back to the Region of

3
00:00:02,799 --> 00:00:04,200
Agriculture podcast, where we

4
00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:05,240
have all kinds of fun

5
00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:07,719
conversations related to soil

6
00:00:07,719 --> 00:00:09,080
health and plant health.

7
00:00:09,869 --> 00:00:12,660
And in this in this fascinating

8
00:00:12,660 --> 00:00:14,740
world, as we are learning that

9
00:00:15,220 --> 00:00:17,620
plants have brains and they have

10
00:00:17,620 --> 00:00:19,219
the ability to think and to make

11
00:00:19,219 --> 00:00:20,300
informed decisions,

12
00:00:21,100 --> 00:00:21,920
they have

13
00:00:22,449 --> 00:00:24,890
they make very conscious

14
00:00:25,589 --> 00:00:27,030
specific informed decisions

15
00:00:27,030 --> 00:00:28,309
about how to interact with their

16
00:00:28,309 --> 00:00:29,649
environment, how to respond to

17
00:00:29,649 --> 00:00:30,449
different stimulus,

18
00:00:30,870 --> 00:00:32,929
how to associate and

19
00:00:33,270 --> 00:00:35,549
support their microbiome or not.

20
00:00:37,060 --> 00:00:37,859
It's,

21
00:00:37,899 --> 00:00:38,979
we developed this,

22
00:00:40,109 --> 00:00:40,909
we're developing a very

23
00:00:40,850 --> 00:00:43,429
different perspective than what

24
00:00:43,429 --> 00:00:45,310
we have generally collectively

25
00:00:45,310 --> 00:00:46,109
held

26
00:00:47,369 --> 00:00:49,469
historically on the way that

27
00:00:49,469 --> 00:00:50,450
plants interact with their

28
00:00:50,450 --> 00:00:51,289
environment, the way that they

29
00:00:51,289 --> 00:00:52,829
interact with their microbiome.

30
00:00:53,369 --> 00:00:54,450
And of course, the way we move

31
00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:55,890
these boundaries forward is

32
00:00:55,890 --> 00:00:58,210
constantly by researching,

33
00:00:58,609 --> 00:00:59,689
by studying more and trying to

34
00:00:59,689 --> 00:01:00,670
understand how

35
00:01:01,009 --> 00:01:01,990
interactions are happening.

36
00:01:02,109 --> 00:01:03,490
And some of these some

37
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:05,780
of these experiments can be very

38
00:01:05,780 --> 00:01:07,680
sophisticated, but often some of

39
00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:09,780
the best discoveries come from

40
00:01:09,780 --> 00:01:11,319
the simple experiments or simple

41
00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:12,480
observations out in the field.

42
00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:14,599
So for our conversation today,

43
00:01:15,170 --> 00:01:17,609
I'm joined by Maisie Canetop,

44
00:01:17,689 --> 00:01:18,489
who

45
00:01:18,549 --> 00:01:20,450
ran an experiment that

46
00:01:20,790 --> 00:01:23,250
caught our team's attention here

47
00:01:23,250 --> 00:01:24,829
at AEA. And they were delighted

48
00:01:24,829 --> 00:01:25,629
by

49
00:01:25,709 --> 00:01:27,189
the simplicity of the

50
00:01:27,189 --> 00:01:28,670
experiment, the elegance of the

51
00:01:28,670 --> 00:01:29,909
experiment and the results that

52
00:01:29,909 --> 00:01:30,709
came out of it.

53
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:33,579
So Maisie, thank you for being

54
00:01:33,579 --> 00:01:34,500
willing to join me today.

55
00:01:35,129 --> 00:01:36,189
Tell us a little bit about

56
00:01:36,189 --> 00:01:38,010
yourself, your background and

57
00:01:38,010 --> 00:01:39,290
the experiment and what inspired

58
00:01:39,290 --> 00:01:40,650
you to run this experiment.

59
00:01:41,409 --> 00:01:42,890
For the past three

60
00:01:43,269 --> 00:01:45,609
years at my middle school, we

61
00:01:45,609 --> 00:01:47,230
have been required to do a

62
00:01:47,230 --> 00:01:48,430
Stanford project every year.

63
00:01:48,989 --> 00:01:51,769
and my dad is he works

64
00:01:51,980 --> 00:01:55,340
in like an urban farm and works

65
00:01:55,340 --> 00:01:57,829
to promote farm and

66
00:01:58,209 --> 00:01:59,700
like the

67
00:02:01,019 --> 00:02:02,079
He works in that area.

68
00:02:02,420 --> 00:02:05,109
So I have grown up around always

69
00:02:05,109 --> 00:02:06,390
hearing about that in my house.

70
00:02:06,629 --> 00:02:08,469
And I knew I wanted to explore

71
00:02:08,469 --> 00:02:09,930
something similar to that.

72
00:02:10,689 --> 00:02:14,180
And a huge problem that I

73
00:02:14,180 --> 00:02:15,960
think impacts a lot of young

74
00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:18,579
people is climate change and the

75
00:02:18,579 --> 00:02:19,780
impact on the environment that

76
00:02:19,780 --> 00:02:20,580
humans are having.

77
00:02:20,879 --> 00:02:23,340
So I wanted to connect those two

78
00:02:23,340 --> 00:02:24,140
areas.

79
00:02:24,909 --> 00:02:27,430
So I decided with the help of

80
00:02:27,430 --> 00:02:28,849
two soil scientists,

81
00:02:29,170 --> 00:02:31,050
Dr. Akila Martin and Dr.

82
00:02:31,110 --> 00:02:31,910
Israel,

83
00:02:32,099 --> 00:02:35,069
that I wanted to research how we

84
00:02:35,069 --> 00:02:37,370
could exchange the use of

85
00:02:37,370 --> 00:02:38,689
harmful agrochemicals that are

86
00:02:38,689 --> 00:02:41,449
depleting soils and exchange

87
00:02:41,449 --> 00:02:43,430
those for endophytes,

88
00:02:43,969 --> 00:02:44,990
a type of bacteria,

89
00:02:45,389 --> 00:02:46,189
which

90
00:02:45,949 --> 00:02:47,889
instead of depleting soils,

91
00:02:48,030 --> 00:02:50,150
helps regenerate them and

92
00:02:50,150 --> 00:02:50,950
promotes

93
00:02:50,990 --> 00:02:52,909
ecosystem health as well as

94
00:02:52,909 --> 00:02:53,710
plant health.

95
00:02:53,990 --> 00:02:55,129
And so what did your experiment

96
00:02:55,129 --> 00:02:56,129
end up looking like?

97
00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:57,680
So the way I started,

98
00:02:58,139 --> 00:02:59,759
I took buckwheat seeds,

99
00:03:00,180 --> 00:03:02,639
and I also took soil, and I

100
00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:04,620
sterilized that soil because I

101
00:03:04,620 --> 00:03:06,040
was only testing one type of

102
00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:07,699
bacteria, so I needed to control

103
00:03:07,699 --> 00:03:08,500
the environment.

104
00:03:08,780 --> 00:03:11,790
And I inoculated some seeds,

105
00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:14,719
and I didn't inoculate the other

106
00:03:14,719 --> 00:03:15,520
seeds.

107
00:03:15,340 --> 00:03:17,219
And I had four different groups.

108
00:03:17,420 --> 00:03:18,840
I had one group that was the

109
00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:19,640
control,

110
00:03:19,500 --> 00:03:21,300
which was the non -inoculated

111
00:03:21,300 --> 00:03:23,019
seeds grown in sterilized soil.

112
00:03:23,490 --> 00:03:24,750
I had one group that was

113
00:03:24,750 --> 00:03:26,230
inoculated seeds grown in

114
00:03:26,230 --> 00:03:27,030
sterilized soil.

115
00:03:27,319 --> 00:03:28,759
I had one group that was

116
00:03:28,759 --> 00:03:31,300
inoculated seeds grown in non

117
00:03:31,300 --> 00:03:32,939
-sterilized soil, so soil that

118
00:03:32,939 --> 00:03:34,480
was just collected from my

119
00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:35,280
garden.

120
00:03:35,519 --> 00:03:37,400
And then I had a non

121
00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:38,200
-sterilized,

122
00:03:38,740 --> 00:03:39,540
sorry,

123
00:03:39,300 --> 00:03:41,400
non -inoculated seeds grown in

124
00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:42,540
non -sterilized soil.

125
00:03:43,650 --> 00:03:46,000
I proceeded to grow those plants

126
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:47,400
for different periods of time.

127
00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:49,480
So I had plants growing for two

128
00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:50,939
weeks, four weeks, and then

129
00:03:50,939 --> 00:03:51,740
three months.

130
00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:54,060
And after that,

131
00:03:54,569 --> 00:03:56,810
period of time, I would collect

132
00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,479
plant samples and clean them

133
00:03:59,479 --> 00:04:02,240
with a mesh to get all the soil

134
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:03,040
off the roots.

135
00:04:03,599 --> 00:04:06,060
And originally, my plan was to

136
00:04:06,060 --> 00:04:08,879
use a software called Rizovision

137
00:04:08,879 --> 00:04:11,460
that analyzes plant root hairs.

138
00:04:11,990 --> 00:04:12,790
But

139
00:04:12,620 --> 00:04:14,060
unfortunately, I didn't have

140
00:04:14,060 --> 00:04:16,740
access to the proper technology

141
00:04:16,740 --> 00:04:18,379
to use that software.

142
00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:20,379
So I ended up having to

143
00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:25,170
engineer my plan and I decided

144
00:04:25,170 --> 00:04:27,269
to use a microscope to take

145
00:04:27,269 --> 00:04:28,730
pictures of the roots and then

146
00:04:28,730 --> 00:04:29,990
count the root hairs myself

147
00:04:29,990 --> 00:04:31,569
instead of using the software to

148
00:04:31,569 --> 00:04:32,370
do it for me.

149
00:04:32,670 --> 00:04:34,720
Which ended up taking a little

150
00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:36,240
more time than I had originally

151
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:37,040
planned

152
00:04:37,079 --> 00:04:40,350
but it ended up it ended up okay

153
00:04:40,350 --> 00:04:43,189
and I discovered after

154
00:04:43,189 --> 00:04:44,689
collecting samples from all my

155
00:04:44,689 --> 00:04:45,490
data

156
00:04:45,980 --> 00:04:48,500
from all four groups that the

157
00:04:48,500 --> 00:04:50,579
plants that were inoculated

158
00:04:50,579 --> 00:04:51,540
overall

159
00:04:53,290 --> 00:04:55,509
despite being in non -sterilized

160
00:04:55,790 --> 00:04:57,569
soil versus sterilized soil,

161
00:04:58,149 --> 00:05:00,149
overall had the most number of

162
00:05:00,149 --> 00:05:00,949
root hairs.

163
00:05:01,259 --> 00:05:02,480
So root hairs are,

164
00:05:03,269 --> 00:05:04,069
unlike a root,

165
00:05:04,389 --> 00:05:06,529
they have little shoots that you

166
00:05:06,529 --> 00:05:07,930
can't see with your eyes,

167
00:05:08,029 --> 00:05:08,829
they're microscopic,

168
00:05:09,189 --> 00:05:12,540
and they allow bacteria to cycle

169
00:05:12,540 --> 00:05:13,340
through the plant.

170
00:05:13,639 --> 00:05:15,159
So by measuring root hairs, it

171
00:05:15,159 --> 00:05:16,879
was a good way to see how the

172
00:05:16,879 --> 00:05:18,420
endophytes were actually

173
00:05:18,420 --> 00:05:19,220
impacting the plant.

174
00:05:19,970 --> 00:05:21,709
And I also measured bricks,

175
00:05:21,850 --> 00:05:23,189
which is a way to measure the

176
00:05:23,189 --> 00:05:24,649
sugar level of a plant.

177
00:05:25,420 --> 00:05:26,279
or of any liquid.

178
00:05:27,149 --> 00:05:28,329
And I found that,

179
00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:29,800
well,

180
00:05:29,959 --> 00:05:31,159
originally I thought that the

181
00:05:31,159 --> 00:05:32,180
plants that were inoculated

182
00:05:32,180 --> 00:05:33,939
would have higher brooks levels,

183
00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:35,519
but it turned out they didn't,

184
00:05:35,620 --> 00:05:36,920
which I realized was because

185
00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:38,240
they were using their sugars to

186
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:39,040
flower,

187
00:05:38,939 --> 00:05:40,480
while the plants that weren't

188
00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:42,319
inoculated still were using

189
00:05:42,319 --> 00:05:44,100
their sugars to produce

190
00:05:44,100 --> 00:05:45,680
cotyledons and grow new leaves,

191
00:05:46,300 --> 00:05:47,480
which meant that the sugars were

192
00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:48,280
more concentrated,

193
00:05:48,740 --> 00:05:49,540
which

194
00:05:49,319 --> 00:05:50,879
in turn supported my original

195
00:05:50,879 --> 00:05:53,379
hypothesis that the inoculated

196
00:05:53,379 --> 00:05:55,040
plants and that the endophytic

197
00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:57,000
bacteria would benefit the

198
00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:57,800
plants.

199
00:05:57,100 --> 00:05:59,139
So this is an important point.

200
00:05:59,220 --> 00:06:01,139
Did you observe the plants to be

201
00:06:01,139 --> 00:06:02,180
at different developmental

202
00:06:02,180 --> 00:06:03,480
stages or to develop at

203
00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:04,660
different speeds based on

204
00:06:04,660 --> 00:06:05,560
whether they were inoculated?

205
00:06:05,879 --> 00:06:07,540
The inoculated plants,

206
00:06:07,939 --> 00:06:09,180
not only did they develop

207
00:06:09,180 --> 00:06:10,959
faster, but they also had a

208
00:06:10,959 --> 00:06:11,879
higher survival rate.

209
00:06:11,980 --> 00:06:12,780
So the plants that weren't

210
00:06:12,740 --> 00:06:14,379
inoculated, more of them died

211
00:06:14,379 --> 00:06:15,220
and didn't survive.

212
00:06:16,060 --> 00:06:17,540
The plants that were inoculated

213
00:06:17,540 --> 00:06:20,459
had healthier, fuller leaves and

214
00:06:20,459 --> 00:06:22,120
began to flower faster, while

215
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:22,920
the plants that weren't

216
00:06:22,879 --> 00:06:23,680
inoculated

217
00:06:24,029 --> 00:06:26,189
hadn't started to flower yet by

218
00:06:26,189 --> 00:06:27,430
the time my experiment ended.

219
00:06:28,519 --> 00:06:29,959
So even over the course of a 90

220
00:06:29,959 --> 00:06:31,379
-day experiment, they were not

221
00:06:31,379 --> 00:06:32,279
yet at the flowering stage,

222
00:06:32,340 --> 00:06:33,480
which is quite slow for

223
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:34,280
buckwheat.

224
00:06:35,420 --> 00:06:36,220
Yeah.

225
00:06:36,569 --> 00:06:38,250
I think that's also due to the

226
00:06:38,250 --> 00:06:39,990
fact that it was in serum soil,

227
00:06:40,129 --> 00:06:41,350
so there was very little

228
00:06:41,350 --> 00:06:42,930
microbial activity.

229
00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:45,279
which wasn't great for the

230
00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:46,079
buckwheat plant.

231
00:06:46,420 --> 00:06:47,279
How significant were the

232
00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:48,759
differences that you observed in

233
00:06:48,759 --> 00:06:49,980
the root hair development?

234
00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:51,459
And I'm also curious just about

235
00:06:51,459 --> 00:06:52,699
the overall root biomass.

236
00:06:52,939 --> 00:06:54,860
What did the root biomass and

237
00:06:54,860 --> 00:06:55,660
the root hair development,

238
00:06:56,079 --> 00:06:57,040
how was it different?

239
00:06:57,259 --> 00:06:58,319
And I'm also curious about how

240
00:06:58,319 --> 00:06:59,300
it was different on the

241
00:06:59,300 --> 00:07:00,360
sterilized versus the non

242
00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:01,160
-sterilized soil.

243
00:07:02,709 --> 00:07:03,509
Yeah,

244
00:07:03,350 --> 00:07:06,170
so I didn't take the biomass of

245
00:07:06,170 --> 00:07:08,409
the roots. I only looked at root

246
00:07:08,409 --> 00:07:09,209
hair growth.

247
00:07:09,699 --> 00:07:11,300
and originally I wanted to

248
00:07:11,300 --> 00:07:13,100
measure like the length of root

249
00:07:13,100 --> 00:07:14,639
hairs, but I wasn't able to do

250
00:07:14,639 --> 00:07:16,360
that without like the software

251
00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:18,459
that I wanted to use, so I

252
00:07:18,610 --> 00:07:20,069
couldn't do that in my

253
00:07:20,069 --> 00:07:20,870
experiment.

254
00:07:21,639 --> 00:07:24,819
So the plants grown that were

255
00:07:24,819 --> 00:07:26,959
inoculated in sterile soil

256
00:07:26,959 --> 00:07:27,759
versus

257
00:07:27,819 --> 00:07:30,399
non -inoc, like the non

258
00:07:30,399 --> 00:07:31,939
-inoculated ones in sterile

259
00:07:31,939 --> 00:07:32,740
soil,

260
00:07:32,620 --> 00:07:33,750
they had pretty,

261
00:07:34,149 --> 00:07:34,949
they had like a

262
00:07:35,069 --> 00:07:36,129
pretty similar numbers.

263
00:07:36,269 --> 00:07:37,310
The ones that were inoculated

264
00:07:37,310 --> 00:07:40,110
did have more overall, but they

265
00:07:40,110 --> 00:07:41,990
were closely followed by the

266
00:07:41,990 --> 00:07:42,790
ones

267
00:07:42,870 --> 00:07:44,370
that weren't inoculated.

268
00:07:44,589 --> 00:07:46,069
The biggest difference,

269
00:07:46,370 --> 00:07:47,329
even though they had similar

270
00:07:47,329 --> 00:07:48,529
root hairs, the biggest

271
00:07:48,529 --> 00:07:51,089
difference was in the

272
00:07:51,399 --> 00:07:54,420
growth that I observed, like how

273
00:07:54,420 --> 00:07:55,220
quickly they developed.

274
00:07:55,990 --> 00:07:58,110
And what was, how would you

275
00:07:58,110 --> 00:07:58,910
describe the differences?

276
00:07:59,069 --> 00:08:00,449
How much more rapidly did the

277
00:08:00,449 --> 00:08:01,350
plants develop that were

278
00:08:01,350 --> 00:08:02,150
inoculated?

279
00:08:01,930 --> 00:08:02,730
What were the,

280
00:08:03,329 --> 00:08:04,389
if you can describe that?

281
00:08:06,959 --> 00:08:07,759
They were

282
00:08:08,050 --> 00:08:09,550
very different.

283
00:08:09,670 --> 00:08:10,889
At the end of my experiment,

284
00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:13,980
um, I have, I took photos of the

285
00:08:13,980 --> 00:08:15,420
control and the plants that

286
00:08:15,420 --> 00:08:16,220
were,

287
00:08:16,459 --> 00:08:17,259
um,

288
00:08:17,060 --> 00:08:18,159
the seeds that were, weren't

289
00:08:18,159 --> 00:08:19,659
inoculated and compared them to

290
00:08:19,659 --> 00:08:20,459
the ones that were.

291
00:08:20,819 --> 00:08:22,480
And the plants that weren't

292
00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:24,100
inoculated, they only had like,

293
00:08:24,750 --> 00:08:26,790
like five leaves, and they still

294
00:08:26,790 --> 00:08:29,269
had cotyledons, as I said, and

295
00:08:29,269 --> 00:08:30,829
they weren't flowering, and they

296
00:08:30,829 --> 00:08:31,769
were pretty short,

297
00:08:32,389 --> 00:08:33,189
um,

298
00:08:33,110 --> 00:08:34,450
while the plants that were, they

299
00:08:34,450 --> 00:08:35,590
were tall, like they were like

300
00:08:35,590 --> 00:08:36,750
spilling out of the containers,

301
00:08:37,049 --> 00:08:39,330
and they had many leaves, and

302
00:08:39,330 --> 00:08:40,529
the leaves were fully developed,

303
00:08:40,830 --> 00:08:42,409
and they were flowering.

304
00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:44,319
So that was on the sterilized

305
00:08:44,319 --> 00:08:45,799
soil. Was a similar pattern also

306
00:08:45,799 --> 00:08:47,039
true on the non -sterile soil?

307
00:08:47,809 --> 00:08:48,609
Yeah,

308
00:08:48,470 --> 00:08:50,909
they were less developed than

309
00:08:50,909 --> 00:08:52,669
the plants that were inoculated

310
00:08:52,669 --> 00:08:55,090
in the non -sterilized soil,

311
00:08:55,509 --> 00:08:56,309
but

312
00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:57,639
they

313
00:08:58,330 --> 00:09:00,269
were kind of like in the middle

314
00:09:00,269 --> 00:09:01,069
ground.

315
00:09:01,090 --> 00:09:03,990
So they had developed leaves and

316
00:09:04,680 --> 00:09:06,680
didn't have cotyledons anymore,

317
00:09:06,819 --> 00:09:09,019
but weren't as far along as the

318
00:09:09,019 --> 00:09:09,960
plants that were inoculated.

319
00:09:10,610 --> 00:09:11,809
The central

320
00:09:12,180 --> 00:09:15,169
thesis or hypothesis that you

321
00:09:15,169 --> 00:09:15,969
were

322
00:09:16,180 --> 00:09:17,620
that your testing method is

323
00:09:17,620 --> 00:09:20,680
based on is you're extrapolating

324
00:09:20,680 --> 00:09:22,980
the presence or the activity

325
00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:26,149
of associated endophytes based

326
00:09:26,149 --> 00:09:27,409
on root hair development

327
00:09:28,490 --> 00:09:29,309
in essence.

328
00:09:31,470 --> 00:09:32,950
And I'm sorry, I kind of

329
00:09:32,950 --> 00:09:34,129
distracted you because I asked

330
00:09:34,129 --> 00:09:35,149
about overall root biomass.

331
00:09:35,490 --> 00:09:37,669
But what did you discover in

332
00:09:37,669 --> 00:09:39,450
terms of the root hair

333
00:09:39,450 --> 00:09:40,250
development

334
00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:41,799
Did you have substantially more

335
00:09:41,799 --> 00:09:42,599
root hair?

336
00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:43,120
How much more?

337
00:09:43,590 --> 00:09:45,590
So at the first

338
00:09:46,029 --> 00:09:47,129
point,

339
00:09:48,019 --> 00:09:49,360
the first time that I collected

340
00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:50,159
the

341
00:09:50,340 --> 00:09:51,139
root hairs,

342
00:09:51,539 --> 00:09:53,980
the inoculated plants had a

343
00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:56,080
huge amount

344
00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:57,479
more.

345
00:09:57,759 --> 00:10:00,309
It was very apparent.

346
00:10:00,809 --> 00:10:02,629
They had triple

347
00:10:04,379 --> 00:10:05,980
the amount of root hairs.

348
00:10:07,009 --> 00:10:08,389
And then as time passed,

349
00:10:09,019 --> 00:10:10,539
the other groups slowly started

350
00:10:10,539 --> 00:10:12,519
to catch up. But the gap, they

351
00:10:12,519 --> 00:10:13,960
were never able to close the

352
00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:14,759
gap.

353
00:10:14,809 --> 00:10:15,609
So

354
00:10:15,379 --> 00:10:17,179
during the second

355
00:10:17,490 --> 00:10:18,750
time

356
00:10:20,039 --> 00:10:21,820
area, like the second - So you

357
00:10:21,820 --> 00:10:23,279
were collecting at two weeks and

358
00:10:23,279 --> 00:10:24,720
four weeks and then three

359
00:10:24,720 --> 00:10:25,539
months, I think you said?

360
00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:26,479
Three months.

361
00:10:26,700 --> 00:10:27,500
Yeah.

362
00:10:27,740 --> 00:10:29,559
So at the second time, they had

363
00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:31,679
about 300 for

364
00:10:32,190 --> 00:10:32,990
the,

365
00:10:32,990 --> 00:10:34,169
that I counted, like the

366
00:10:34,610 --> 00:10:36,549
roothers, the native microbes

367
00:10:36,549 --> 00:10:38,350
and inoculated, and then this

368
00:10:38,350 --> 00:10:39,149
native microbes.

369
00:10:39,269 --> 00:10:40,809
And then the inoculated plants

370
00:10:40,809 --> 00:10:41,690
had 600.

371
00:10:42,470 --> 00:10:43,649
So it was,

372
00:10:44,559 --> 00:10:45,940
almost triple, and then

373
00:10:46,799 --> 00:10:48,779
after three months,

374
00:10:49,590 --> 00:10:51,009
the plants that were inoculated

375
00:10:51,319 --> 00:10:54,180
in sterilized soil

376
00:10:54,460 --> 00:10:55,860
versus the plants that were

377
00:10:55,860 --> 00:10:58,120
inoculated in native soil had

378
00:10:58,120 --> 00:10:59,819
almost 300 more.

379
00:11:00,529 --> 00:11:03,069
So over time, the gaps slowly

380
00:11:03,069 --> 00:11:05,309
started to close, but the

381
00:11:05,529 --> 00:11:06,809
inoculated plants always had

382
00:11:06,809 --> 00:11:07,609
more fruit.

383
00:11:07,930 --> 00:11:08,730
I

384
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:09,500
think this is a common

385
00:11:09,500 --> 00:11:11,419
phenomenon that we observe in

386
00:11:11,419 --> 00:11:13,120
practical application out in the

387
00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:14,240
field, is that

388
00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:17,059
when seeds are inoculated, there

389
00:11:17,059 --> 00:11:17,859
is often this

390
00:11:18,289 --> 00:11:19,769
this early and rapid

391
00:11:19,769 --> 00:11:21,069
proliferation of biology.

392
00:11:21,930 --> 00:11:23,470
And if you have soils that have

393
00:11:23,470 --> 00:11:25,029
where the microbiome is

394
00:11:25,029 --> 00:11:25,829
compromised,

395
00:11:26,430 --> 00:11:28,029
they do have the ability to

396
00:11:28,029 --> 00:11:30,330
recruit microbes from the soil

397
00:11:30,330 --> 00:11:32,250
microbiome, but it just it takes

398
00:11:32,250 --> 00:11:33,830
time to build up that soil, that

399
00:11:33,830 --> 00:11:34,950
root microbiome.

400
00:11:35,419 --> 00:11:37,720
and they never fully catch up to

401
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,519
what um so your your

402
00:11:40,519 --> 00:11:41,759
experimental evidence matches

403
00:11:41,759 --> 00:11:42,840
very well with what we observe

404
00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:43,639
out in the field

405
00:11:45,690 --> 00:11:48,909
so the what was the how

406
00:11:49,899 --> 00:11:51,340
difficult was it to set up this

407
00:11:51,340 --> 00:11:53,000
experiment and to conduct it

408
00:11:55,039 --> 00:11:55,919
um i

409
00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,179
had so when i started my

410
00:11:59,179 --> 00:12:00,879
experiment i started it like

411
00:12:01,580 --> 00:12:03,799
months more than three months

412
00:12:03,799 --> 00:12:06,080
before like the deadline and

413
00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:08,740
I had to repeat the experiment

414
00:12:08,740 --> 00:12:09,539
three

415
00:12:09,919 --> 00:12:11,759
times, because in the beginning,

416
00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:13,440
my soil

417
00:12:13,950 --> 00:12:16,269
had the pH wasn't

418
00:12:16,269 --> 00:12:19,330
the right pH for the buckwheat.

419
00:12:19,570 --> 00:12:21,129
And many of them died, and I

420
00:12:21,129 --> 00:12:22,289
didn't have enough to collect

421
00:12:22,289 --> 00:12:23,429
the number of samples that I

422
00:12:23,429 --> 00:12:24,229
needed.

423
00:12:24,190 --> 00:12:25,809
So then I started over,

424
00:12:26,230 --> 00:12:27,710
and I repeated the same process

425
00:12:27,710 --> 00:12:28,509
again.

426
00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:29,720
And the same thing happened,

427
00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:30,860
where they didn't survive.

428
00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:32,620
So I did it a third time,

429
00:12:33,139 --> 00:12:35,580
and I changed the pH by adding

430
00:12:35,580 --> 00:12:36,379
sulfur.

431
00:12:36,870 --> 00:12:38,470
because buckwheat prefers more

432
00:12:38,470 --> 00:12:39,269
acidic soils.

433
00:12:40,080 --> 00:12:40,879
And

434
00:12:40,610 --> 00:12:43,009
this time I did have a lot of

435
00:12:43,220 --> 00:12:44,019
samples.

436
00:12:44,799 --> 00:12:45,799
I also think that

437
00:12:46,309 --> 00:12:48,190
it was difficult for the

438
00:12:48,190 --> 00:12:49,769
buckwheat to survive in

439
00:12:49,769 --> 00:12:51,430
completely sterilized soil,

440
00:12:51,819 --> 00:12:53,500
which contributed,

441
00:12:53,860 --> 00:12:55,850
I think, to the higher

442
00:12:55,850 --> 00:12:58,990
death rate of the buckwheat

443
00:12:58,990 --> 00:12:59,789
plants.

444
00:13:00,590 --> 00:13:03,870
So it was difficult to have

445
00:13:03,870 --> 00:13:06,110
to redo my whole experiment

446
00:13:06,110 --> 00:13:07,990
multiple times to get the

447
00:13:07,990 --> 00:13:08,870
results that I wanted.

448
00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:12,519
it was

449
00:13:13,289 --> 00:13:15,330
another challenge for me was

450
00:13:15,610 --> 00:13:17,649
taking all the pictures of all

451
00:13:17,649 --> 00:13:18,990
the root samples because I had

452
00:13:19,500 --> 00:13:21,620
I had a lot of groups I had a

453
00:13:21,620 --> 00:13:23,919
lot of root samples and I was

454
00:13:23,919 --> 00:13:25,860
taking I had to take like

455
00:13:27,100 --> 00:13:27,899
like

456
00:13:28,250 --> 00:13:31,389
70 between like 50 and 70 photos

457
00:13:31,389 --> 00:13:33,889
of each sample and then count

458
00:13:33,889 --> 00:13:35,049
the number of root hairs for

459
00:13:35,049 --> 00:13:36,570
every single photo for every

460
00:13:36,570 --> 00:13:37,960
single root.

461
00:13:38,779 --> 00:13:41,039
And that took a lot of time.

462
00:13:41,179 --> 00:13:42,580
So that was challenging,

463
00:13:43,299 --> 00:13:44,099
but

464
00:13:44,220 --> 00:13:46,759
it worked out in the end, so.

465
00:13:47,279 --> 00:13:48,379
That sounds like a lot of

466
00:13:48,379 --> 00:13:49,179
counting anyway.

467
00:13:49,950 --> 00:13:50,750
Yeah.

468
00:13:50,710 --> 00:13:52,169
Yeah, it was a lot of testing.

469
00:13:52,850 --> 00:13:56,029
So you mentioned the unexpected

470
00:13:56,029 --> 00:13:58,370
results in regards to the

471
00:13:58,370 --> 00:13:59,909
variation in BRICS response

472
00:13:59,909 --> 00:14:00,909
versus the plants that were

473
00:14:00,909 --> 00:14:02,009
flowering and those that were

474
00:14:02,009 --> 00:14:02,809
not.

475
00:14:03,129 --> 00:14:04,590
Were there any other results

476
00:14:04,590 --> 00:14:06,490
that surprised you or that were

477
00:14:06,490 --> 00:14:07,289
unexpected?

478
00:14:07,769 --> 00:14:10,049
It surprised me that

479
00:14:10,490 --> 00:14:12,230
the plants that

480
00:14:12,669 --> 00:14:14,649
were grown in native microbes

481
00:14:14,649 --> 00:14:15,449
were,

482
00:14:16,279 --> 00:14:17,079
like

483
00:14:16,850 --> 00:14:18,549
how you described earlier, like

484
00:14:18,549 --> 00:14:20,269
they started with

485
00:14:21,120 --> 00:14:23,279
lower number of root hairs and

486
00:14:23,279 --> 00:14:24,620
it surprised me how they were

487
00:14:24,620 --> 00:14:26,980
able to catch up over time.

488
00:14:28,049 --> 00:14:28,849
But

489
00:14:30,019 --> 00:14:32,259
my hypothesis in the end was

490
00:14:32,259 --> 00:14:34,220
proven correct, so although the

491
00:14:34,220 --> 00:14:35,620
BRICS number surprised me,

492
00:14:36,230 --> 00:14:39,389
and the initial to

493
00:14:39,389 --> 00:14:41,809
final numbers of plants grown

494
00:14:41,809 --> 00:14:43,950
without the inoculant surprised

495
00:14:43,950 --> 00:14:44,750
me,

496
00:14:45,169 --> 00:14:45,969
the

497
00:14:46,379 --> 00:14:48,740
overall results supported what I

498
00:14:48,740 --> 00:14:49,720
initially thought.

499
00:14:50,919 --> 00:14:53,039
I think it's worth noting for

500
00:14:55,190 --> 00:14:56,049
for the benefit of our

501
00:14:56,049 --> 00:14:56,849
listeners.

502
00:14:56,730 --> 00:14:59,059
We're describing this experiment

503
00:14:59,059 --> 00:15:00,740
in terms of the endophytic

504
00:15:00,740 --> 00:15:02,200
microbes. And obviously you're

505
00:15:02,200 --> 00:15:03,539
measuring root hair development

506
00:15:03,539 --> 00:15:06,080
with, I think, based on Dr.

507
00:15:06,159 --> 00:15:07,259
James White's work and other

508
00:15:07,259 --> 00:15:08,680
people's work. Those certainly

509
00:15:08,680 --> 00:15:10,399
are associated with the presence

510
00:15:10,399 --> 00:15:11,600
of endophytes within the plant

511
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:12,740
and their activity.

512
00:15:14,529 --> 00:15:16,069
And also the

513
00:15:16,450 --> 00:15:17,569
product that you were using was

514
00:15:17,569 --> 00:15:18,889
not just endophytic microbes

515
00:15:18,889 --> 00:15:19,689
alone.

516
00:15:19,590 --> 00:15:20,870
It was also mycorrhizal fungi

517
00:15:20,870 --> 00:15:21,669
and other things.

518
00:15:22,980 --> 00:15:24,379
And this year,

519
00:15:25,039 --> 00:15:27,340
I'm building off of my project

520
00:15:27,500 --> 00:15:28,480
from last year,

521
00:15:28,820 --> 00:15:31,299
and I'm taking individual

522
00:15:31,299 --> 00:15:33,580
strains of endophytes,

523
00:15:33,899 --> 00:15:35,659
specifically Bacillus species,

524
00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:37,820
like Bacillus subtilis and

525
00:15:37,820 --> 00:15:38,840
Thuringiensis,

526
00:15:39,269 --> 00:15:40,950
and inoculating buckwheat to see

527
00:15:40,950 --> 00:15:43,600
how the specific strains impact

528
00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:44,399
the root hairs.

529
00:15:45,009 --> 00:15:47,169
And then I'm also growing

530
00:15:47,169 --> 00:15:50,669
buckwheat on a farm to see how

531
00:15:50,669 --> 00:15:53,639
the inoculant will work in a

532
00:15:53,639 --> 00:15:55,580
actual agricultural environment

533
00:15:55,580 --> 00:15:58,139
instead of in a lab laboratory

534
00:15:58,139 --> 00:15:58,939
environment.

535
00:15:59,730 --> 00:16:00,629
Yeah, it would be interesting.

536
00:16:00,950 --> 00:16:02,090
Of course, it would add another

537
00:16:02,090 --> 00:16:03,149
layer of complexity, but it

538
00:16:03,149 --> 00:16:04,350
would be interesting to, again,

539
00:16:04,490 --> 00:16:06,590
compare to see if there is a

540
00:16:06,590 --> 00:16:08,309
contrast between the individual

541
00:16:08,309 --> 00:16:10,710
species and the combination of

542
00:16:10,710 --> 00:16:11,690
different species that also

543
00:16:11,690 --> 00:16:12,710
includes the mycorrhizae.

544
00:16:14,559 --> 00:16:15,359
Yeah.

545
00:16:16,220 --> 00:16:17,019
Well,

546
00:16:17,059 --> 00:16:17,879
Maisie, thank you.

547
00:16:17,980 --> 00:16:18,779
Thank you for running the

548
00:16:18,639 --> 00:16:20,179
experiment. Oh, our team would

549
00:16:20,179 --> 00:16:21,500
not be happy if I didn't mention

550
00:16:21,500 --> 00:16:22,860
that the product that Maisie was

551
00:16:22,860 --> 00:16:24,319
using was actually BioCode Gold.

552
00:16:25,210 --> 00:16:26,470
So Maisie, thank you for that

553
00:16:26,470 --> 00:16:27,289
experiment.

554
00:16:27,710 --> 00:16:29,549
Thank you for the

555
00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:31,019
work that you're doing and being

556
00:16:31,019 --> 00:16:33,039
willing to come on here onto the

557
00:16:33,039 --> 00:16:33,879
show and to talk about it.

558
00:16:34,080 --> 00:16:34,879
Thanks for all that you do.

559
00:16:35,379 --> 00:16:36,179
Thank you.

560
00:16:35,980 --> 00:16:36,840
Thanks for having me.

561
00:16:38,659 --> 00:16:40,259
The team at AEA and I are

562
00:16:40,259 --> 00:16:41,779
dedicated to bringing this show

563
00:16:41,779 --> 00:16:43,379
to you because we believe that

564
00:16:43,379 --> 00:16:45,080
knowledge and information is the

565
00:16:45,080 --> 00:16:46,740
foundation of successful

566
00:16:46,740 --> 00:16:48,019
regenerative systems.

567
00:16:48,659 --> 00:16:50,740
At AEA, we believe that growing

568
00:16:50,740 --> 00:16:52,480
better quality food and making

569
00:16:52,480 --> 00:16:54,000
more money from your crops is

570
00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:54,799
possible.

571
00:16:55,139 --> 00:16:56,080
And since 2006,

572
00:16:56,399 --> 00:16:57,360
we've worked with leading

573
00:16:57,360 --> 00:16:58,700
professional growers to help

574
00:16:58,700 --> 00:16:59,680
them do just that.

575
00:17:00,409 --> 00:17:02,049
At AEA, we don't guess.

576
00:17:02,309 --> 00:17:03,549
We test. We analyze.

577
00:17:04,220 --> 00:17:05,480
And we provide recommendations

578
00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:07,259
based on scientific data,

579
00:17:07,700 --> 00:17:08,539
knowledge, and experience.

580
00:17:09,329 --> 00:17:10,390
We've developed products that

581
00:17:10,390 --> 00:17:11,690
are uniquely positioned to help

582
00:17:11,690 --> 00:17:13,190
growers make more money with

583
00:17:13,190 --> 00:17:14,190
regenerative agriculture.

584
00:17:14,910 --> 00:17:16,309
If you are a professional grower

585
00:17:16,309 --> 00:17:18,150
who believes in testing instead

586
00:17:18,150 --> 00:17:18,950
of guessing,

587
00:17:19,490 --> 00:17:20,599
someone who believes in a

588
00:17:20,599 --> 00:17:22,000
better, more regenerative way to

589
00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:22,799
grow,

590
00:17:23,069 --> 00:17:25,490
visit advancingecoag .com and

591
00:17:25,490 --> 00:17:27,029
contact us to see if AEA is

592
00:17:27,029 --> 00:17:27,829
right for you.

Chapters

No chapters available.