MLV All-Star Teams Announced, Crunch Time for Some Teams Heading into LOVB Final Weeks
In this episode of Volley Talk, we take a look at the fan-voted (?), league-determined (?) player-inputted (?) MLV All-Star teams. Basically, we have no idea how exactly these teams were chosen, but we have some thoughts.
We also break down some of the longer winning and losing streaks in various leagues. Are they indicative of how the team actually plays or is something weird going on?
Join our MLV fantasy league for the 2026 season!! Go to playvoli.com/volleytalk to participate. Download the app on iOS or Android to get in on the action!
If you have questions for us or topics you would like us to explore, drop us a line on Instagram or email us at info@sarahpavan.com!
Instagram: https://instagram.com/volleytalk_podcast
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
Hi volleyball fans and welcome back to Volley Talk, the podcast created for volleyball lovers who want to dig deep into what is going on in NCAA and international volleyball. I'm your host Sarah Pavan. I'm an Olympian, beach volleyball world champion, former Nebraska Cornhusker, and longtime pro both indoor and on the beach. And I'm Adam Schultz, former indoor player, international volleyball coach, and the show's resident stat guy. The saga continues and I say saga. In the best way possible. We got playoffs. We've got teams climbing ranks. We've got teams hitting the basement. You name it, we've got it. Champions League Final Four for women is set. Playoffs are winding down in major leagues around the world, which for a lot of you means VNL is right around the corner, which is very exciting. And for others of you, it means that we are that much closer to restarting NCAA women's season. No matter what your flavor, it's around. So yeah, we've got a bunch going on this week. We're very excited to talk volleyball with you guys as always. So let's get started. We've got a new leader in volley, Crafty Killers. Only person to crack 4 ,000 aggregated points so far. Congrats. You know, things were pretty stable in our fantasy league for like nine rounds. And now everything's getting shaken up week after week, which means maybe we all have hope. I don't, but I think a lot of people might still have hope because guess what? I'm in the hundreds now. Oh, I was going to ask if you were. I'm a has been. And the highest I got was what? My 50s? Yeah. Looking bleak yet again. I had a decent week. I scored 350. I can't seem to get above that. Yeah, I scored about 349, which I thought was great. Then I looked at what other people scored this week and I was like, not even close. There were lots of people who had great weeks. Like, what did you guys do? It's what I want. I know I could just look it up, but just tell me. Because I thought I did really well. Well, I finally had my two dud players come off the books this week. Those signings. Who were your duds? I had Abercrombie. And then, yeah, so that was terrible. Adam's not looking at the injury report. I thought she was going to be coming back. To be honest, neither am I, which is probably why I'm not doing well. I don't think there's an injury report for MLB, only for love. There has to be. I don't think so. That's tough. I had a couple bad signings for three weeks that really killed me. I was playing wounded, down two men. You know what? I'm cheering for you guys. All you guys at the top are vying for that number one spot. I'm happy for you. I'm more sad for me than I am happy for you, though. I think my new goal is to have one 400 -point week before the season ends. Okay, that's fair. That's what I'm shooting for. I can aim for that, too. Okay, that's our new goal because we are... Sucking. Terrible. We're in the top quarter because we've got over 450 teams in our league. If you feel like you're missing out, you are. Okay, there's still time. You can join in at the average score, which... Right around me. Right around Adam. So it's not too late. Go to playvolley .com slash volleytalk. Playvolley .com slash volleytalk if you want to get in on the action and understand our pain. It is fun, though. I'm really enjoying it. Okay, noteworthy. Results in the NCAA men's side. Are you ready for this? Number 18, Ohio State beat number 7, Loyola Chicago 3 -1 and number 15, Lewis 3 straight. That's a good week for them. Yeah, they are climbing. Loyola Chicago is going to have to drop. Outside of the top 10, I think. Amoeba has been like all over the place. This season. They're all like beating up on each other. But it kind of happened last year too. So that conference is dangerous, you guys. And Hawaii Long Beach State played this week. Do you know what happened? Did you look it up? I have not seen the results yet. Do you want me to tell you? Yes. I'm going to tell you because I have to tell everybody. Hawaii won both matches. They were playing in Long Beach. First one they won in five. The second one they won three straight. Did you look at who played? No. Did you? Are you asking me who played because you want your boy Cade to have not played? Also known as Kanoa Wade. I'm just curious if they won with him playing, but it looks like Trisky did play, although it doesn't seem like he had two great matches. But having him on the floor, I think, just changes the dynamic. It forces teams to look at anything. They're just better with him on the floor. So good to see that he's back playing. Well, we're going to have a new number two now, everybody. Yep. So those were the big. Matches this week on the men's side. UCLA still unbeaten. That makes me nervous going into playoffs. It really does. I just, I firmly believe you need a little adversity. And maybe that adversity will be not winning the MPSF, but winning nationals. I don't know. But it's just so hard to be perfect all year long. On the MLV side, the all -star game is this weekend. We are going to talk about who made the cut shortly. But same story as always. Indy at the top, followed by Dallas. Omaha, however, has jumped into number three. So who knows? We'll talk about that later too. If they've righted the ship or not. And big result of the week, Atlanta beat Orlando three straight. So Orlando is kind of floundering. Yes, they have not been great. Do we know what's wrong with Abercrombie? I haven't heard anything. And I can't, again. I might not be looking in the right place, but I don't think there is a clear injury report for MLV. Not sure. On the love side, Houston holding on to that number one spot, although they did just lose to Madison. So that's very straight. I looked it up. Everybody was playing except Rafaela Foley. Who knows? I mean, everybody drops a game now and then. I mean, we just said it about UCLA. Adam wants these teams to drop games. But Atlanta jumped Salt Lake. We watched Love this week. We did. We watched Atlanta Salt Lake. We watched Nebraska -Austin. Austin has fallen. They've lost four in a row. They've fallen to number five. They are currently out of the playoffs. And we'll look at a couple Love teams in our game this week. We talked about this at the beginning of the year. What happens if the U .S. national team doesn't make the playoffs? It is a definite possibility at this point. Somebody tell me why the middle from the Polish national team is playing behind Molly McCage and Asia O 'Neal. Somebody tell me this. This girl is playing in world championships for Poland, and she's riding the bench at Love Austin. She didn't go to Texas. I'm honestly surprised that Inouye is playing libero. It was a little hit and miss there for a while. Touching goes. Zoe Jarvis was starting over her now and then, but finally Inouye is playing. So I'm like, okay, at least something's happening. At least I saw a match where Carly Lloyd started setting over Brio Riley. Tell me when that should happen. There's a lot of weird stuff happening in Austin. But anyway, they're in fifth. What did you think of the Nebraska -Austin match? How is Kettle not playing for Nebraska? I don't know. They tried to say that the setter has a better connection with the other two middles. Trust me, she'd probably have a good connection with Cattle. I don't know if she's still injured or... That doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, Nebraska's winning games right now, but Cattle is a very, very good middle. And an outstanding blocker. And Nebraska's passing well. Like, you can run... I don't know. Can we also talk about the fact that Austin started out that match serving Jordan Larson? That... We talked about the U .S. team at VNL looking like they didn't necessarily have a plan, not being able to understand what they were trying to accomplish. Austin looks the same way to me now. I don't know what their plan is. I don't know what they're trying to do offensively, defensively. Sometimes they're in rhythm. Sometimes they're not. It feels messy watching them. And yeah, I'm not sure what their like defensive plan is. I'm sorry. Dykema is not a particularly consistent setter. No. Jordan Larson is in her retirement phase of her career. She's not super terminal at this point. No, but she is though. Like she's scoring a ton of points. She's not like jumping. That's my point. Jordan carved. That team to pieces. They moved. They weren't in position. They weren't reading anything. Like, if you see the ball go over Jordan's shoulder and she's leaning off the net because the set's not good, she has nowhere to go but into position four. Or like rolling it into the middle of the court, which has scored, I can't even tell you how many points. She scored on bad sets consistently against them. What are you looking at? What have you prepared for? Give Jordan props. The way that she's finding ways to score is incredible. But guys. The thing is, is that Jordan is no longer going to blow you off the ball. Right? You need to go. You know what, Jordan? If you're going to hit perimeters and you're going to beat us. Have at it. You can score those shots. We're not going to give you the stuff that you're good at because as soon as you move and she sees open court, she can hit it. Again, I'm not trying to take anything away from Jordan Larson. That's just the reality of the situation. And Austin was moving consistently, opening things up for her. They didn't have a plan. They weren't recognizing when the sets were off the net. They weren't recognizing when Jordan couldn't swing. It was like watching high school volleyball. And Bausch. I do like that Bouch is playing over Jaylee Winters now. Agreed. Thank you. She's not a player going up and hitting just outstanding angles either. And, like, why are you serving Jordan? I'll go back to it. Serve Ann. Or Lexi. They're not prepared. They are not prepared to compete against athletes who know what's going on. It's messy. It's not disciplined. And there doesn't look like there's a plan. This is embarrassing, quite frankly, watching them play. Like you and I had this conversation. I don't, I didn't have the stats to back it up, but the two coaches who have international experience, who have coached outside of the USA system have brought their teams to the top of love now. And I don't think that that is by accident. You look at which teams started hot. Remember when we were like Sonja Tomasovic not getting rehired? I take that back. I'm sorry. She's done a fantastic job. They've done a lot better. This is the mark, in my opinion, of a good coach. Your teams get better as the season goes on. You find your rhythm. Again, maybe it's messy at the beginning because you're trying to do something the players aren't used to or you're trying to put a system in or you're trying to build cohesiveness or a culture. It has worked for those two teams. They are playing better and better as the season goes on. And, I mean, Madison has been bad the whole time, but Austin started out pretty well, and I don't believe they've had any significant injuries, and they have gotten worse and worse. They are not adjusting to anything that's happening, and that is not a good sign because that's your national team staff. Well, similarly, Salt Lake started 8 -1, and we watched them play Atlanta. They looked very bad. Horrible. Very bad. Alexa Gray, what was it? She had two kills on 20 swings with eight errors. You're hitting negative 300. That is hard to do. That is hard to do. Well, she wasn't very good. Their passing was in disarray. Jordan Poulter did not set well. I don't think she set well. She was running all over the court on the balls that were actually passed well to the net. Her sets were trailing off for the hitters. I thought she actually set better from the attack line than she did from good passes, but I didn't love her back row setting. Casanova was leading the hitters enough in the back row. Yeah, it was brutal. That's another team that has regressed because they had their full starting lineup there. Everybody's back. Everybody is back. That'll be interesting. Definitely the teams. who are at the top, who are playing well, have shifted. I think they probably have the best shot to win at this point because they're just playing better. They're making adjustments. They're doing what they're supposed to be doing. Now, I will say, I think Atlanta can have their passing broken down, but the league doesn't serve super tough consistently. So if they can pass, they'll be all right. But that, to me, is kind of where I see their Achilles heel being. Yeah, you've got McKenzie Adams, San Giacomo, and Hanoi. Yes. Not the most elite passing lineup there is. Yeah. But they look way better than Salt Lake. Yeah. Okay. Something else to talk about with Salt Lake. They've gotten rid of all their spin serves. Yes, they have. They were only float serving. That also has to come from the coach because you have a couple players. Casanova used to spin serve. Ronnie Jones -Perry came in to serve, float serve. She's a spin server. Was there anybody else? I mean, those are two right off the bat. They were all float serving. And not only that, they were float serving poorly. They were missing serves. They weren't putting a ton of pressure on. You need to make Mackenzie Adams pass with her forearms, and she was just stepping up and passing with her hands. You're letting her off the hook. If that's the case. And I was a shock to see that. And where is Kosa Paula? She's like the only person on the team not playing. All right. Italian playoffs. Two matches have been played in the women's semifinals. Milano's up 2 -0 on Scandici. And Corneliano's up 2 -0 on Novara. So this is potentially coming to an end next match. On the men's side, three of the four quarterfinal series are done. Perugia beat Monza and Chivita Nova beat Trentino. Three matches to zero. Trentino has had a rough season. This is not up to their standards. No. I'm trying to think if... I mean, Micheleto's out. They're other left side out. We know that. But... still as a club and the history and tradition they have, it's got to be disappointing. Yeah, I totally agree. It's disappointing. I mean, again, you lost your first two left sides and passing was a real issue for them against Chivitsa Nova, but it just didn't seem like they were pushing. It almost looked like they were resigned to the fact that it was a written off season. I didn't think Farr played very well. It's not what you would expect from a winning culture, from an attitude and fight standpoint. I know they came back. I know they pushed a couple sets, but you would just expect it to be a little different, I think. But again, Mickey Leto is such a good player. You've lost your ball control left side as well. It's definitely a tough position. Verona beat Milano three matches to one and Piacenza Modena are heading to a fifth match. So yet to be determined the exact matchups, but Verona's playing Chivita Nova and then Perugia is waiting to see who they play in the semis. And Champions League. Women's semifinals are set. Vakif Bank is taking on Conigliano and Scandici is playing Izazibashi. So, Vacavbank and Milano went five, both matches. Obviously, Vacavbank won both of them. Zarin Ankara beat Conigliano in five in the return match, but Conigliano won the first one three straight, so it didn't even matter. Reshov beat Izazibashi in five in the away match, but they lost the home match in four, so that one didn't matter. And then Fenerbahce, Scandici went to a golden set. Gandicci won 15 -13 in the Golden Set. Full disclosure, we did not watch the Champions League matches this week. So we are going to go back and watch them because we've got a whole month before the Final Four starts. So we are going to go back and watch those so we can talk about them more in depth next week. But that is what's happening on that front. And then on the news front. Zarin, Sport, Ankara. It was said that they got their financial problems under control, but Aleksic and Mihailovic left the team during playoffs and went back to Serbia because they are still waiting for a whole lot of money. So turns out the financial stuff maybe isn't resolved. But for players to go home. at the end very end of the season during playoffs like that is bold and obviously something is going on so i mean you have played with mihailovich she doesn't seem like a person who has a ton of patience so i'm kind of it seems in line with what i've seen of her but it Kind of means you're probably not going to get paid at all. Like, why not wait it out? Yeah, interesting to see what's going on there and how that ends up playing out. And if they're a team next year. Well, Sarah Franklin signed with them. The question that I kept getting on messages is like, does this mean Sarah Franklin's going to reconsider her going there? Who knows? It would definitely make me pause. It would raise some red flags for me, too. Absolutely. As we said, lots going on. Been a big week. We obviously have some huge mashups that we unfortunately were not able to catch. So we're going to go back and catch some of those. Well, I think it's good that we have a month until the women's Final Four. We can kind of break down the different series maybe week by week and watch the games as a little lead -in. Because there aren't other games happening. It's fine. But that volleyball is very good. From the scores of the matches, it looks like they're going to be entertaining to watch, period. As we alluded to earlier, the MLV All -Star Game is this weekend, and that obviously means that the MLV All -Stars were selected. In taking a look, it seems that the players were selected through a combination of fan voting, player input, not sure what that means, and league selection. I'm guessing it's mostly fan voting with some veto power for making sure every team gets some person or something along those lines. That'd be my guess. If you were looking at the volleyball landscape, which team do you think would get the most pick? My first instinct is who's got the biggest fan base, which leads me to Omaha. But I think it should be the best team. So to me, Indy and Dallas should have the most players. Okay, so... Indy does have the most players. They have five. They're also super fun to watch, which I think is good for fans. Dallas and Orlando had four each. Tracks. Omaha had two. Maybe the Omaha fans are upset with their team and voted for other people. So I was pretty surprised to see that they had two because Grand Rapids also only had two. Columbus. Only had two, but they're at the bottom. Makes sense. But the fact that Omaha only has two, I was like, what? So that was weird. You would expect a program with that much support to get more love. Guess which player had the most votes out of anybody. Lexi Rodriguez. They're wrong league. No, I know she's in the other league. See, I don't even understand why Adam's trying to be funny. Brooke and Nana Viller. No. Leah Edmond. Adam. I'm so disappointed. I have no idea. Elena Scott. Your favorite player of all time. And it wasn't even on your radar. I didn't think it would get the most votes. Wow. Okay. So Elena Scott got the most votes. We all know how I feel about all -star games. We talked about it last year at this time. Bane of my existence. When I was a player, I was like, no, I do not want to be in this game. All -star games are terrible for players and for people who like the sport for the purity of the sport. All -star games are great for corporate sponsors and families. Families of the players or families who go watch? No, families who go watch. The city that is hosting the all -star game, it's a ton of fun. It's interactive for the fans, for the kids. It's great for that. But if you like high -level sports, all -star games is not it. How do you feel about the college coaches? Who coach these games. I mean. This year's Dan Maskey and Beth Launier, by the way. Sure. We'll see it on social media, but. Adam doesn't rip apart anybody, but Dan Maskey catches so many strays from him. Okay. Dan Maskey is to Adam as Ellis Wendell is to me. I get it. You don't want coaches from your league doing it. I think that's just a little strange and you don't really have. Any other high profile coaches you can pull in, like the national team is coaching in love, so you're not going to bring them in. College would be the next biggest names in the sport that you would potentially bring in. So I'm fine with it. I mean, you see this a lot. I'm okay with it. Let's go through the list and we can say if there's anybody that we're like, why are you here? And anybody that is missing. All right, hit me. Okay, so I'll go by position. Opposites, we've got Iko Jones, Azani Teeler, Raina Terry, and Emily Laundot. I don't love the opposites in the league overall. Same. Abercrombie's hurt, which makes sense. I would probably have picked Kaylee Cox over Emily Laundot. I was thinking about Cox, yeah. That would be, I think the other three are fine. They've had good seasons. I don't know whether this was... Like, Londot didn't even start. She took over. And also, is Raina Terry even playing opposite? Because let me tell you, in fantasy, I have her as an outside. I'm not 100 % sure. But I'm sure they have her. I mean, I'm sure they have it right here. Okay. Yeah, I think that would be the only potential switch that I would make. Fair. I also am not a fan of the opposites in the league. So, meh. Okay, Liberos. Morgan Hentz. Shara Venegas. Elena Scott. Theodora Pusich. I'm like, where's Elena Ogilvie? That was the one that came to mind as well. Who would you replace? I mean, she's had a better season than Morgan Hentz. Fair. Honestly, like, okay, Venegas, her team isn't very good, but, like, she has done well over the last couple seasons. Yeah, it is what it is, but I'm just saying, like, Ogilvie's had a pretty good season. I think statistically she... Earned a spot in the All -Star game. But I don't know who you replace with that. Given fan votes and everything else. Setters. We've got Mia Tuoniga. Adams. Fantasy. Setter. Trumpu. Natalia Valentine Anderson. And Marley Monserez. I think Sydney Hilly is one of the best setters in the league. I'm surprised she's not on this list. Same. I would replace Marley Monserez, as everybody probably could guess. Yeah, that's probably the switch I make too. And just, I thought she was a fan favorite in Omaha. Well, Omaha clearly didn't show up because only two of their players got picked. And Emily Landau was one of them. She's not one of the ones that I thought would get picked. No, definitely not. So I'm a little confused about that. So who is missing for me from this? And I'm trying to do this from like objectively who's had good seasons and statistically is playing well. Not kind of my favorite, but I think Sidney Hill is probably one of the better setters in the league. So that was surprising to me. Middle blockers, Reagan, Pittman, Nelson, Lydia Martin, Kaz Brown, Lane Van Buskirk, Blake Moeller, Maren Grote. I think those are solid choices. I'm not sure I would replace anyone, but I think that Ramat Alhassan has had a really good season. So I think that. She could have been on that list and I would have been okay with it as well. But she was the one that came to mind as was potentially left off or just missed the cut. Like this list for me, I'm okay with it. This has been the best so far, I think. Yeah. And then finally, outsides, we've got Mimi Collier, Paige Briggs -Romine, Brooke Nunneviller, Leah Edmond, Sofia Maldonado -Diaz, Charity Looper. Key names missing for me would be Lector Member Mena. Yeah. And Carly Snyder. Also. I'm wondering if Lector Member Mena was left off just because Indy had so many players that were already selected. I don't know how you leave her off the list. I'm not sure. I think she's probably one of their best players, if not their best player. One of the better players in the whole league. Yeah. For sure. Maybe she's nursing an injury. Like maybe she decided not. I'm just I'm shocked that she is not there. Yeah. And then Carly Snyder, I think, is having a really good season. They did take breaks from that team, though. True. Who is having a good season? Grand Rapids and overall is not. I mean, you can make a case for all the outsides who were picked, but I could also make a case for those ones, too. You know what I mean? It's like. So, I mean. Again, it is what it is. We don't know. I'm sure some people decided not to go. I'm nursing an injury. I don't want to travel. I wonder if you can choose not to go. I'm sure you need a medical reason. Maybe that's the player input thing. Yeah. But those would be, looking at that list, just kind of off the top of my head, those would be the players that I thought could have, should have been in the running or I wouldn't have batted an eye if they had been on the list. So do you think the list is outrageous? Do you think it's about what we expected? I think it's pretty close. I don't think it's outrageous. There's nobody on that list who sticks out as not belonging. Yeah. There's a couple on the edges, but that's going to happen in an all -star game. We'll watch the all -star game. I'm curious to see how it actually happens. I'm curious to see what the compete level is, but we'll follow up with this next week as to what the atmosphere was like, what the competition was like, see who actually played. I'm hoping it's a fun event. But I think very rarely all -star games are done really well. It's time for our game. Great. I'm nervous again. So this game is called fraudulent or for real. Adam loves an alliteration. I think it's pretty much mandatory when you're naming something. So I'm going to give you a couple streaks that are currently happening in volleyball. I want you to tell me whether you think the streak is fraudulent and will be reversed or whether you think the streak is for real and this is what the team actually is. So most of them have to do with teams that have kind of flip -flopped, whether they've been winning, going to losing, or vice versa. And I want your opinion on kind of where they're at and what we can expect to see. So we talked about this a little bit, but since February 21st, Salt Lake City is 1 -7 after having a commanding lead in love. Poulter's played in half those sets, and Alexa Gray has played in all of those sets in some way, shape, or form. So this is not a case of missing players. They might not be healthy, but they have been playing. Where's your head at with Salt Lake and how they finish the season? So to go with the naming convention of this game, I'm going to say that this streak is for real. I think I was high on Salt Lake at the beginning of the year. I thought they looked so good. But this decline and just like the certain changes we've seen from like serving tactics, demeanor on the court. decision -making, who's playing, who's not. I feel like this slide is showing who this team is. I tend to agree with you. It's not just one thing. The passing didn't look good. The serving was not great. Jordan Poulter doesn't look like herself. There's just too many things going on to, I think, fix it right away. I agree with you. I think this is for real. I think they're going to have to hang on to a playoff spot. Okay. Also, from Love, flipping in the other direction, in the last nine games, Austin is 2 -7 after getting out to a pretty good start at the beginning of the season. They don't have any major injuries. There's nothing discernible that you can kind of put your finger on. Do you think they're the first half of the season team, or do you think this is how they're going to finish? I'm going to also say for real, because watching them play from a technical perspective, like you said, it's not anything glaring. I think it's a tactical type of thing. Like, Brie O 'Reilly has a good connection with the middles. She has a pretty good connection with Eggleston. I don't think that she has a good connection with Skinner at all. Does anyone? I don't know. It's just like something's missing. It's just not it for me. And yeah, it's not like I watch it. It just seems like a tactical thing. I don't know. It's like, I can't even put my finger on it, but I kind of feel like it's a, this is just the team. This is how the team is. I also have a hard time articulating what's going on with them. It seems like they're moving in a direction at a decent pace. You just don't know what direction that is. Sometimes one player will be playing well, it'll come together, and then it's three head -scratching moments in a row, and then they'll just do something, like you said, tactically that leaves you wondering what the plan is. I think they probably have a... Better chance of getting it on the rails than Salt Lake, but I'm still not high on that happening. Okay. Omaha has won their last three matches after losing six in a row. They have beaten... They lost six in a row. They lost six in a row. MLB? Yes. Their last three games, they have beaten Columbus, Indy, and Grand Rapids. Have they figured it out, and is their three -game win streak for real? Fraudulent. You beat the two worst teams in the league. Granted, the Indy match was a huge win, but I don't know. I'm not buying it. They've been all over the map this season. They just, something's off with them. I don't know. I'm not buying it. I think they're going to continue to see -saw the whole rest of the way. Yeah, I mean, it's great that you've won three games in a row. Indy was going to eventually lose to someone, but you need to beat some good teams. Like, I want to see you beat Atlanta or Orlando or Dallas before I'm on board with... Or when, like, beat two of those teams in a row. Yeah. And then I might start changing my mind. You've just seen too much inconsistency to believe that right now. Trevitsynova is... Six and one in their last seven matches. Are they the real deal? Or are they going to wash out in the semis? I'm going to say for real. They are playing Verona, who is like, I don't know, the little brother for me of the Italian League. A little more free spirited, fun loving, goofy. Like it's a different vibe of team. But Chivita Nova, I don't know, they've got some like dogs. You know what I mean? Nikolov is impressive. He's playing so well. They're like, Chivita Nova is also a young team, but they're just like. Not like the fun -loving young team. They're the young team who are like, no, we are going to show you all that we deserve to be here. You know what I mean? They're out to earn some respect. So I think it's for real. They're still alive in Champions League. They're in the semifinals of the Italian League. I think it's real. Yeah, watching them play and beat Trentino in the way that they did. Even if they don't win, I think they're for real. The matches they play, they're fighting. They want to win. They're clicking on all cylinders. I think they're for real. All right, and our last one. I have a little smile on my face because I know how you feel about these guys. Stanford is on a six -game win streak. Yeah, who have they played though? She didn't even let me finish. So they beat Concordia twice. They beat St. Francis University twice, but they did just beat BYU twice. Yeah. I have a feeling they're playing UCLA. They have UCLA, and I believe they have one other top -tier school. Rodulent. I had high hopes for Stanford going into this season, but all season long until BYU, it was exactly what we were seeing. They could not buy a win against a... top ranked team or a decently ranked team they've they've done what they needed to do against unranked teams but you like you need to BYU I think was the exception I don't I think this streak is going to come to an abrupt halt definitely they play UCLA they're not going to win that game I in fact I would imagine they're going to lose 3 -0 3 -0 I believe they play another top team after that and then they have a gimme match after that before the playoffs. So they're probably going to go two and six, one and seven in those matches. So I fraudulent as well. Well, that was fraudulent or for real. I actually, how long did it take you to find these streaks? I had to dig. I had to do a little digging, but I kind of liked the game. So we love an alliteration. That's like, everyone's going to, I feel like people are going to have something to say. About which part? All the ones who are on a like, I don't know. I feel like I was not positive for anybody except Chibi Tanova. I mean, if you're going to swing your fortunes, you have to be good teams and you have to look consistent. And I'm not sure any of those teams are. And quite frankly, there were more losing streaks than winning streaks happening. It will be curious to see. Particularly, I think Omaha is the one I'm most interested. to watch because you had such high expectations you kept waiting out of the teams that are in the U .S. leagues who need to keep their streaks going like Salt Lake needs to win Austin needs to win I think Omaha has the best chance of keeping their win streak going and finishing strong I would say over Austin or Salt Lake dang we'll see I don't know I don't know I don't buy it. I'm not buying a lot these days, apparently. But this is what makes the run into the playoffs so interesting. The games matter now. Austin could catch Salt Lake. For me, love will be interesting for the last three weeks. Who is going to fight? Who's going to squeak in? Is Austin going to win some games? Is Salt Lake going to keep plummeting? There's actually some storylines and some intrigue to follow now. And not everybody makes playoffs this year, thankfully. Which is fantastic. I do think Love has made a couple good changes to the league to make these matches mean something. You know what else I'm going to say about Love? I am so happy that they don't say best in the world every other sentence this year. Correct. They've done a much better job with the announcing of the matches. If only some North American broadcasts would show the end court view, I'd be happy. All right, let's dive into some listener questions. We've got a whole bunch today. Let's go. So question one, who do you think are the contenders for Liberos for 2026 VNL? I assume Hentz and Rodriguez. But do you think Maya Sands, Elena Scott, or Elena Ogilvie all have the potential of being invited? Is Zoe Fleck slash Jarvis still an option or has she not progressed enough? I think the first two will be she wins to get a shot. And has had the worst season. I mean, I think she'll still get a chance. I think those two are still. She has not been playing well. But those two are. She's improved since leaving Omaha. Still going to be the front runners for VNL. I think Zoe has played herself off personally. Yeah, I thought that before last season too, though. Well, yeah, but she got some opportunities and she didn't perform. If I'm a USA coach, I'm looking at that going, okay, I saw what I needed to saw. I want to give somebody else a chance and see. I've seen what I needed to see. Yeah. Potentially Elena Scott, potentially Ogilvy could get a shot. Maya Sands, I don't think so. No, I don't think so either. So I think one of those two will be added to the roster, whether or not. They get a chance to play VNL. I'm not sure, but I think they'll be on the wide roster. Agreed. I mean, somebody like tell us, but I like kind of heard last season that Elena Scott said no to national team. But then I also heard that she wasn't invited. So I'm like, those are two very different things. Which one is true? If she wasn't invited last season. I think she's made a case for herself for sure to be picked. If she wasn't invited to me, that was a, we're choosing Zoe over you. Now Zoe's gone, but you have to have three liberos at minimum three liberos on the wide roster in case somebody gets hurt. You're either going to have three or four. I think Elena Scott after those other two is probably my first call up. I would put Elena Scott over Morgan Hentz right now, honestly. Elena Ogilvie has made a case for herself. Agreed. After the season she's had in MLV. But also, would I be shocked if they hold up Roseno again? No. I feel like the love athletes definitely get priority. And so, yeah, I wouldn't be shocked if Briseño, I wouldn't be shocked, honestly, if they even put Grimes ahead of them because now she's playing for Madison. I just think that it's. If that happens, it's a case of them not doing their full homework. The whole staff is playing. Or just like being prejudiced against MLB. I mean, maybe. And like the perceived level of that league, I would say. I honestly. Even though I think Ogilvy has made a case for herself and that Elena Scott has made a case for herself, I think that they will prioritize Briseño because she's playing love. Whether it's deserved or not, it is what it is. But I think Hentz will get a chance because she's been in the program. But that is just my intuition. Question two, I would like to hear more about how NCAA athletes and pro athletes train. What was training like when Sarah was at Nebraska? It was forever ago. How did she manage the jump to pros? What were her strategies to maximize performance and minimize injury? Does it seem like the current NCAA teams are emphasizing or investing in strength training more than in years past? Does NIL money allow NCAA athletes to train more like pros? First of all, I played a long time ago in college, but I will say Nebraska was definitely ahead of its time for strength and conditioning, which was a big draw for me of why I chose to go there. For us, in my experience, in season, we trained. We had games Wednesdays and Saturdays. We trained every other day, like three hours a day. We had one day off a week, two days a week. We were also lifting in the off season from January till March. We did conditioning, strength and conditioning for mornings a week. And we also did the same thing in the summer. So all of us always stayed in the summer. We took summer classes and did strength and conditioning. to prepare for the season I honestly think that a strong emphasis on strength and conditioning and recovery whether it's stretching or yoga or recovery stationary bike whatever I think is a huge reason why I had such a long career I spent a ton of time taking care of my body and really, really prioritized strength and conditioning, my band exercises, my warmups. Like I showed up at practice so early to just like go through all my band work for my hips, for my shoulders, for everything. So it is tedious. It is boring. It's not fun. But I will say I probably spent as much, if not more time taking care of myself outside of practice time than I did in. And that includes like body work, chiropractic, massage, you name it. And this is one of the things that I was going to bring up is your health and how you play. Again, sometimes there are freak injuries. Sometimes there are bodies that just break down. That happens. But I think for the most part, whether you stay healthy or not is about consistency and how diligent you are when you're not injured. This is one of the most common things I see with athletes is they're very good with rehab when they're coming back from injury, but then they don't do anything when they're quote unquote healthy. That's just about your own personal discipline. It's about knowing your body. It's about. understanding what you have to do to stay healthy. It's about grinding it out. And sometimes that's tough in college when you're doing classes and everything else, but definitely as a pro, it's a non -negotiable if you want to have a long career. And I think it's something you did really well. And that includes eating well, sleeping eight hours a night, making sacrifices and prioritizing those things, which, you know, we've talked about before, but you were always very disciplined with that. But I will say like in college, you're young, you are, I mean, at least when I went to school, it was like very much about education. And obviously times have changed. When you're young, it is very much program and coach driven. So like our whole team did strength and conditioning in the off season. Our whole team stayed in the summer. We had to go to strength and conditioning in season on this day and this day. When you go to the pro level, it's like nobody's babysitting you. It's up to you. And the way I always viewed it is like, this is my job. I am being paid to be as prepared as possible to perform at my best. And nobody is going to make sure I'm doing it. So it's on me because like my body is my job and how I make money. So it is, I have to like hone that tool. And I truly believe that like, You need to invest in your career. And that is an investment of time. That's an investment of money. That's, you know, because your body is your tool. And I really believe that you need to invest in it, especially at the pro level when you can only depend on yourself. NIL, do I think that it impacts things? I really do think that it is still program driven despite NIL money. I mean, I can't speak to it because. exact knowledge but my interpretation would be that these things are still very much program driven and not athlete driven to me that's the time in your life where you're learning what your habit should be like this doesn't happen as much anymore a lot of the kids coming into university have strength coaches their club is is lifting and doing those kind of things but you're learning your body you're understanding what a college season grind looks like what you need to do There's a lot or should be a lot of education around staying healthy in college so that you're prepared and you have the knowledge to make your own decisions when and if you choose to play pro. Okay, question three. This one's for you. Because we know that Adam did watch Chivita Nova Trentino this week. So I'm curious to know what Adam's opinions are on Chivita Nova's three outside system. Okay, because we were talking about how this question came in weeks ago, but I feel like we haven't had a chance to watch Chivita Nova, but Adam finally did. So we were talking about how so many teams have two distinct outsides, one very clear right side, but Chivita Nova plays the three. So anyways, that's the background. Watching them was actually outstanding. I had a ton of fun. watching. Sometimes they had Nikolov not passing. Sometimes he was in all of their hitters. I mean, let's be honest. If you have a person who can terminate on the right side and pass, it's a bonus. It just gives you so much flexibility in terms of how you can line up, how you can set up your serve receive against different servers, depending on what angles they're coming from, depending on which way the ball curves, depending on who you want to hit out of the back row. And I thought, They used it incredibly well. I think it's definitely a luxury to have two of three outside hitters who are both terminal and can pass. Great roster construction. And I thought Nikolov was great in the matches that I watched, as were the other outside hitters for them. But I do think Chivita Nova does a really good job utilizing their personnel, specifically in that three outside hitter configuration they have going on. Okay, question four. What do you think about UCLA's new women's coach? If you missed recent episodes, Alfie Reff has moved on to be the head coach of the new Love San Francisco team. So there was a vacancy, which has been filled by Matt Worley, which if you want to wind it back to last year, was the head coach of... Grand Canyon men volleyball. He left them halfway through the season to go be the assistant coach for Kansas women's volleyball. And now he was named the head coach of UCLA women. He also brought over Brian Delamico, who he kind of screwed over and left the head coaching job to NGCU. So it's a big mess. That's what's happening. I don't. So he was successful at GCU, ran a good program, was very good there, so knows obviously how to run a program. Do you know if he's ever coached women before? Kansas. Kansas had their worst season historically, I think, in a very long time. They didn't do horrendous, but they lost a lot of Big 12 games. A lot of players left the program, and they got absolutely... Slapped by Nebraska. He obviously knows volleyball. He knows men's volleyball. Having coached both at a high level, they're different. Yeah. Particularly NCAA men's where there is like a limited number of teams. Yes. And then NCAA women's where it's insane. And you're entering the Big Ten. Yeah. Not only is some of the volleyball pieces different, but how you approach men and women, specifically at this age, is very different. If you haven't done it before, it may take a few tries to kind of find your legs in terms of... You know, how you motivate people, how you get the best out of your players, how you communicate. Like, I think back to how I was coached in college, and my college coach definitely couldn't have coached women. I'm curious to see how it goes more from a can he get his team to buy in, can he get the most out of them, less about the volleyball, if that makes sense. When the job came open, I was speculating who it could be. Never in a million years did I think it would be this guy. I was shocked. Do you think part of it is because people don't want the job? Do you think this is a coveted position? I mean, it should be. I mean, they're not doing well. I don't know what their budget is for women's volleyball these days, but historically they have been a good program in the past. I just don't love how it all went about. Like you leave Grand Canyon suspiciously and then the program folds. So it's like, hey, you clearly knew something was up. You got out there, kind of like left everybody high and dry while you like made sure you were OK. Then you go to Kansas and then last one season and immediately go take another job. I just I just don't love it. And I just never expected him to be the head coach. But who knows? Maybe he'll do. Something special. We'll see. Question five. How do some teams crack into the final four and then seem to become a power program? For example, Kentucky, Louisville, Pitt, et cetera, but others fizzle out and can't seem to regain that again, such as a BYU, San Diego, Kansas, Baylor. What did Louisville, Pitt, and others do to stay on top? Can you analyze these teams that made an appearance but can't go back? And look at the ones that keep coming back. I love this question. I know what my answer is. I'm curious what your answer is. You go first. Okay. My perspective on this is that the ones who crack through and stay for good are the ones who have committed to long -term growth of a program. They have... mapped out a long -term vision of what a rebuild or a building a program looks like and they are okay slowly getting there and their recruiting is very intentional they start with the athletes who might not be pursued by the top top programs but have the grit the personality the team mindset to kind of like ride it through and understand what they're getting into. And they build it piece by piece by piece and eventually build it. The ones who are like a flash in a pan, they're either recruiting from the transfer portal and they gather a whole bunch of athletes that have like one or two, maybe two years of eligibility left, or they happened to like hit the jackpot by recruiting one stud player. Who rides it out for four years and then they just can't keep drawing. So I think it is a very intentional piece on the coaching staff's part of like what they're committing to and their vision. And they do not waver from that vision. The other ones just either get lucky with a really good recruit. And I'm thinking of BYU with Alexa Gray during that period. But didn't San Diego have it? San Diego brought in Gabby Blossom for a year and a couple other ones and made the final four. And then you don't hear Baylor had Presley for a year or for her time. And then like that was it. Yeah. For me, that's the difference. My answer is along the same lines. The programs who make it there and stay have done the little things right along the way to getting there. They've developed. a culture where it's team first and you're building skill and you're teaching your players, you know, what is it expected to be a Kentucky athlete or a Pitt athlete or Louisville? You create a culture and you bring athletes in and then you teach them how to compete. So it doesn't matter when you lose one or two players, even if they're studs. Like when Pitt loses Babcock, they're not going to be the same team, but they're still going to make. The quarterfinals. They're still going to have players in the pipeline that are really good that want to go there. And you look at the coaches like Craig Skinner. I mean, we both know him. He went there in 2005, you guys. Like, think about this. Yes. He coached me at Nebraska my freshman year. Went to Kentucky in 2005. Was building that program until they won in 2020 and then like has been going ever. That is a long time. It's a long time. It's those programs. You don't have sustained success overnight. It is. You have to grind and you have to work through it. The schools that you see come and go. It's like you said, they get one or two athletes and then they build the program around that athlete. They recognize we're going to be good for. Two years when this player, like, and everything is about doing that. And then that player leaves and you have to start over. Because they haven't put in the work. Exactly. And this is, we kind of rag on SMU, but that is kind of, it feels like that's their philosophy. They are trying to recruit from the portal and hit that flash to get, like, the right mix. You don't see. But it's not sustainable long term. Yes. And maybe there's a strategy there. We don't have to talk about it. But that strategy, when I think of it, is kind of the SMU, what I think they're trying to do. That's a great question, though. Real good. Question six. Do you think it's bad for volleyball that the capital of volleyball has two bad teams in their respective leagues? Omaha. That was the question. No. I equate this to being a Leafs fan. The Leafs. They've been good for a while, but even when they stink, they sell out. They're the highest grossing team in the NHL. Same with Omaha. People from Nebraska love volleyball, and it's great, and they're going to go support the teams no matter what. Whereas when you have a new team, they need to be good for people to go and watch. So do you want Omaha to be bad? No. You don't want anyone to be bad, but it's not going to kill the sport. Because people are still going to go support them and they're going to put the money and they're going to try and figure it out. So if anyone is going to be bad, especially when you're starting. It's actually really better than the bad team. Question seven. As a Korean, we're very proud that Kim Young Kyung was considered as one of the all -time best players in the world. I heard you mention her last episode that got me thinking to ask you if you've ever played against her or with her during your career. And what is your impression of her volleyball career during her prime? Yes, I did play against her. In her prime. I played against her in world championships when I played indoor world championships for Canada. And I played against her Champions League when she was playing for Fenerbahce. What can you say? She could do everything. I have so much respect for her. I never played with her. I wish I had. But yes, I played against her. The thing for me is just how... high. Like I contacted the ball at a very high point. Like that was, that was how I made my career is like my contact point and the angles I could hit. She hit so high and so consistently to sidelines and perimeter. Like she was so difficult to stop, but not only that, her serve, that hybrid serve, she was, that thing was. Incredible. Her ball control, the way she read the game, her presence on the court, her decision making. Just, yes, she's 100 % one of the best players of all time. Yeah, I have only good things to say. I have a question for you. Do you think this is a fair characterization? Do you think she is a bigger, more terminal Gabi? I think she is a better offensive Jordan Larson. Fair enough. Okay, question eight. What do you think about moving Van Rijk to the outside and letting Anna Smrek play opposite? This person was like, I know Kira Van Rijk is objectively a better opposite than Anna Smrek, but we're seeing teams start to move. on opposite to the left side do you think this could benefit canada with their current issues this approach is good in theory if you have two players that you want on the court but at this point from what i've seen anna's just not a serviceable six rotation right side she's i think this person was like saw her play because she's with azubashi right now and it's like she played so well I didn't see this match, so I can't speak to it, but... Yeah, again, she hasn't been able to compete internationally for six rotations. Defensively, she's not particularly good. She only hits in -system balls well, so her out -of -system hitting needs to get better for her to be a true right side. I hope she's gotten better, and if she does become that player, then yes, it makes sense to move. van rijk to the left if she can pass if she can pass like so there's a lot of variables there for canada and i would imagine that that's the hope for smack but i haven't seen it yet question nine i know when a team wins their league they either get a bonus or an mlv the team gets a million dollars how is the amount given to each player on the team decided i can speak to the bonus structure model basically when most players have agents that negotiate their contracts so in the process of negotiating a salary etc bonuses also are negotiated by the agent and so it could look different for every player or a team could just offer the same amount to every player but nobody really knows But the agents negotiate those on each player's behalf. For MLV, when the amount is given to the whole team, and I believe a lot of international teams work this way as well when there is prize money for winning big tournaments. Internationally, a lot of teams just... split it equally among everybody. And I believe in MLV, the 1 million is split equally among the roster. I'm not sure if coaching staff is included in that. And I know for some teams internationally, there are some cash prizes for being like the best opposite or best setter. And sometimes it depends on the country, but the country, sometimes the player just keeps it. And sometimes even the individual prizes are split among the team. Okay, last question of the day. Right now, tall offensive setters like Mone and Janelli are dominating the men's game. Do you see a similar kind of player ever being developed on the women's side? I think it's unlikely in the near future just because you don't have enough terminal women yet for it to make sense to move them to the setting position when they're young. Fair. I think what we are seeing, the women's version of what we're seeing right now with the tall offensive setter is we're seeing very, very tall left sides. Yes. We are starting to see the emergence of the 6 '6 left side, which typically players that size were either thrown into the middle or as opposites. But now we're seeing, you know, Markova we're seeing Karakurt and Tropova we're seeing that stature of athletes start to make the transition to the left side and that will change the women's game agreed 10 15 years down the road when you normally have a 6 -6 left side you'll start to see some athletes become really big and be like I'm gonna set but you started setting and there just weren't enough hitters to score to make it make sense to have you set and I think you're still seeing that whereas on the men's side people are just so physical and so athletic that it makes more sense to have that big of a player there that is what is starting to differentiate teams versus in the women's side having a 6 -6 passing left side is now the differentiator the women's evolution is just a little bit behind the men's game because we've seen this happen with the men's. So now the women are just like that step behind. Does that make sense? Love the questions this week. Oh, they're great questions. Honestly, this is always just so much fun. All right. Looking forward this week, Tuesday and Wednesday, Champions League men's quarterfinals. Let's go. The volleyball has been great. Wednesday and Sunday, Italian A1 semifinals for women. Thursday at 8 p .m. Eastern, NCAA men's Ball State versus Lindenwood. Thursday, 8 p .m. Eastern, Love Madison versus Austin on Victory Plus. Bottom feeders. Basement game. Friday and Saturday, 9 p .m. Eastern, NCAA men's Pepperdine versus BYU. And then Saturday at 12 p .m. Eastern, MLV All -Star game. So we'll be bringing you some coverage from that next week. That concludes this week's episode of Volley Talk. There's always something shaking in the volleyball world, and we hope you enjoyed this little fix. Be sure to follow the show so you don't miss any updates, and we'd be so grateful if you'd leave us a five -star review. You can also find us on Instagram at volleytalk underscore podcast. If you have a topic you'd like us to discuss, you can reach out on Instagram or at info at sarahpavin .com. Thanks so much for joining us, and we'll be back next week.