Small Victories

Divided Argument

After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

2024-06-20 88 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

Will: --need our notice and we don't [unintelligible talk about them.
Will: Well, [unintelligible certiorari. So, everything you might have been sad about in Cargill, this is a nice, unanimous endorsement of orthodox standing principles that are also common sense. Love to see it.
Will: I think we [unintelligible

Chapters

No chapters available.