Kicking Off the New Weekly Format
Welcome to the revamped weekly edition of the podcast! In this episode, I tackle listener questions about MEI (Multi-Engine Instructor) privileges and share tips for preparing for a multi-engine add-on rating. I also dive into a couple of engaging discussions from r/Flying Reddit threads that I've recently commented on.
This new weekly format adds regular, bite-sized content between episodes of the longer-form ACS series, which is still in progress and not going away. These weekly shows are designed to keep the conversation going while I continue working on the more in-depth episodes you've come to enjoy.
I hope you like this new approach—your questions and feedback are what keep the show fresh and valuable, so don't hesitate to share your thoughts!
Tune in, and let's explore these topics together.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,640 You are listening to you the VSL Aviation Podcast I'm your host Seth Lake Thanks for listening. 2 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:10,240 And if you're joining us on YouTube thanks for watching. This also has a live recording going 3 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:15,480 in our discord channel You can find links to that on v s l dot arrow That's our website. 4 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,880 So if you wanna join on the next podcast live you can listen 5 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:22,575 to me and bumble through this podcast show unedited. 6 00:00:22,575 --> 00:00:28,175 so maybe it'll be fun Maybe not If we do have somebody jump on the Discord channel, I'll also 7 00:00:28,175 --> 00:00:34,295 pipe them through into the podcast and we can take some live questions And maybe that'll become more popular as this show goes on. 8 00:00:34,295 --> 00:00:37,745 If you've listened to this show for a while you know that I typically don't release many 9 00:00:37,745 --> 00:00:42,165 podcasts I think I only have around twenty five that I've ever released and they're typically 10 00:00:42,165 --> 00:00:47,625 longer format and they deep dive into the airman certification standards for, you know becoming 11 00:00:47,625 --> 00:00:51,405 a commercial pilot or instrument pilot or private pilot whatever. 12 00:00:51,405 --> 00:00:56,885 what I wanna do in order to try to get more content out and answer more questions and try to 13 00:00:56,885 --> 00:01:01,495 educate more is to get a weekly show going out where I answer some of the questions that come up 14 00:01:01,495 --> 00:01:06,325 from week to week because I do get a lot of questions either through email or I see them on 15 00:01:06,325 --> 00:01:11,360 Facebook, see them on Reddit sometimes so we're gonna cover some of those questions. 16 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:16,780 And then hopefully generate a little bit more interactivity where you can send your questions in 17 00:01:16,780 --> 00:01:22,240 , and I can answer it on kind of this weekly format podcast Now don't worry I'm still planning 18 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:26,660 on continuing the series on the airman certification standards That's not stopping. 19 00:01:26,660 --> 00:01:31,930 But that type of show requires a little bit more production, a little bit more time and I don't 20 00:01:31,930 --> 00:01:35,030 always have the time because I've got a lot going on. 21 00:01:35,030 --> 00:01:38,440 So hopefully you enjoy this and I'd love to hear from you You 22 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:42,100 can reach out to me at seth lake at v s l dot arrow. 23 00:01:42,100 --> 00:01:47,170 That's my email address You can go on the website v s l dot arrow find links to the discord 24 00:01:47,170 --> 00:01:51,185 channel Join the discord channel and you can ask questions through Discord. 25 00:01:51,185 --> 00:01:57,957 and I can maybe get back to you on that Anyway, Without further ado let's get started. 26 00:01:57,957 --> 00:02:02,440 So I've got a few questions picked out. two of these are emails I'm just gonna read through the 27 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,600 email real quick and then talk about my response. 28 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:09,800 and hopefully y'all find this type of stuff So I'm just gonna read through the emails and then 29 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:13,360 kind of discuss the answer to that question because I'm sure if one person 30 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:17,040 has this question there are other people that have this question. 31 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:22,520 Alright The first one is from Nomen. Nomen says Hey Good morning sir My name is Nomen and I 32 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,720 wanted to take a moment to thank you for the invaluable support you've 33 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:28,980 provided through your ACS Guide and YouTube videos. 34 00:02:28,980 --> 00:02:33,290 Thanks to your resources I successfully passed my private pilot instrument and commercial pilot 35 00:02:33,290 --> 00:02:36,300 track rates Hey congrats That's a huge accomplishment. 36 00:02:36,300 --> 00:02:39,935 and it's great to hear that you found some of my content helpful. 37 00:02:39,935 --> 00:02:44,305 Anyway your work has been incredibly helpful to me as a student and I appreciate all that you do 38 00:02:44,305 --> 00:02:49,900 for aspiring aviators So those are some very kind words Norman I really appreciate it. 39 00:02:49,900 --> 00:02:53,320 now he goes on to write I am writing to ask for your advice as I 40 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:57,000 prepare for my upcoming multi engine check ride on December thirteenth. 41 00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:00,890 Could you please share some recommendations on how best to prepare for the check ride and 42 00:03:00,890 --> 00:03:06,092 associated ground school Any tips or resources you would suggest… would be greatly appreciated 43 00:03:06,092 --> 00:03:11,622 as I work to ensure I'm fully prepared wishing you and your family a happy Thanksgiving. 44 00:03:11,622 --> 00:03:15,382 Or McGard Norman Well thank you so much that was very kind email. 45 00:03:15,382 --> 00:03:19,472 we did have a good Thanksgiving I had Thanksgiving off actually So I started four day trip with 46 00:03:19,472 --> 00:03:23,972 Southwest that I'm on right now, the day after Thanksgiving So it's the Sunday after 47 00:03:23,972 --> 00:03:28,290 Thanksgiving…first of December… and we 48 00:03:28,290 --> 00:03:32,730 we had a great Thanksgiving So hopefully you did as well So I like this type of question. 49 00:03:32,730 --> 00:03:35,890 So first of all it shows that hey you're you're not just going into it blind 50 00:03:35,890 --> 00:03:39,415 You're you wanna go into it as well prepared as possible. 51 00:03:39,415 --> 00:03:44,755 Now I've done a couple of YouTube videos on the multi engine commercial add on, and I'll start 52 00:03:44,755 --> 00:03:50,095 by saying that you know most of the time when we do a multi engine checkride it's at the commercial level. 53 00:03:50,095 --> 00:03:55,775 Because we wanna do the the add on certificate rather than do it initial because if we do a 54 00:03:55,775 --> 00:04:01,475 commercial multi initial, it requires a lot more hours If we do a add on there's no minimum 55 00:04:01,475 --> 00:04:06,915 hour requirement you can do it in two hours No Most people don't do it in two hours Most people 56 00:04:06,915 --> 00:04:13,705 do it around seven to ten hour time frame … Now if you're doing the add on you're 57 00:04:13,705 --> 00:04:18,925 typically gonna do that as a at the commercial level because if you do the add on as a private, 58 00:04:18,925 --> 00:04:22,325 and then later on you get commercial and you want commercial privileges you're gonna have to do 59 00:04:22,325 --> 00:04:25,765 an additional check ride at the commercial that's just a little bit 60 00:04:25,765 --> 00:04:29,785 about you know why we do a commercial multi add on typically That's why. 61 00:04:29,785 --> 00:04:33,915 And I cover that more in those videos, which I I've got links to here. 62 00:04:33,915 --> 00:04:38,295 So anyway I yeah I said hey thank you for your kind words taking the time to share your success 63 00:04:38,295 --> 00:04:45,275 story Congratulations on past seen … Anyway the first thing that I suggest that Norman do is 64 00:04:45,275 --> 00:04:51,690 look at page eight dash fourteen That's a Pendix a dash fourteen of the commercial ACS. 65 00:04:51,690 --> 00:04:58,510 And in there you're gonna see the additional task table for multi engine rating And and so you 66 00:04:58,510 --> 00:05:05,325 already hold a single engine land commercial certificate So you're just adding on a airplane multi engine land. 67 00:05:05,325 --> 00:05:11,935 So this additional task table takes you through all the areas of operation and the specific tasks that you have to do. 68 00:05:11,935 --> 00:05:17,163 So in area of operation one we only have to do tasks f and g. 69 00:05:17,163 --> 00:05:20,813 And two we do a b c d f and then it goes on There's a 70 00:05:20,813 --> 00:05:24,933 lot of the the areas of operation that we don't have to do anything out of. 71 00:05:24,933 --> 00:05:31,283 And there's a couple like area of operation five We only do task a out of that one. 72 00:05:31,283 --> 00:05:36,873 so that's a good place to start to figure out okay when I take the check ride, what do I have 73 00:05:36,873 --> 00:05:42,151 to show proficiency in for the check ride Now that's different than I'm I'm not saying that's 74 00:05:42,151 --> 00:05:46,021 all you wanna be proficient in Right You wanna be proficient in flying the airplane You wanna 75 00:05:46,021 --> 00:05:51,416 have or be able to show mastery of the aircraft and the multi engine aircraft that you're flying. 76 00:05:51,416 --> 00:05:56,736 But you also… don't need to necessarily waste time doing some of the stuff that's gonna be the 77 00:05:56,736 --> 00:06:01,796 same in a multi as it is in a single And stuff like that's like your navigation tasks Navigating 78 00:06:01,796 --> 00:06:06,601 in a multi engineer craft is really no different than navigating in a single engine aircraft. 79 00:06:06,601 --> 00:06:10,101 of course the fuel burn's gonna be different The performance might be different but there's 80 00:06:10,101 --> 00:06:15,261 really no need for you to practice extra like doing cross countries in a twin because it's 81 00:06:15,261 --> 00:06:18,373 basically the same as doing cross countries in a single. 82 00:06:18,373 --> 00:06:22,583 the main thing that is gonna be different is learning how to fly the multi engineer craft with 83 00:06:22,583 --> 00:06:27,813 one engine inoperative So that's the critical thing It's because now with that asymmetric thrust 84 00:06:27,813 --> 00:06:33,448 in there control ability becomes a big issue in dealing with that controllability, in a safe 85 00:06:33,448 --> 00:06:39,508 manner avoiding a stall spin accident in a twin is really really important So that's where your 86 00:06:39,508 --> 00:06:44,538 training is gonna focus in on So that's a great place to start as the additional task table. 87 00:06:44,538 --> 00:06:50,821 Out of the commercial ACS… then I went on to give him some different resources chapter thirteen 88 00:06:50,821 --> 00:06:55,971 of the airplane flying handbook has transitioning to multi engine operations. 89 00:06:55,971 --> 00:07:02,096 So that's a great FAA source document of how to fly multi engine aircraft. 90 00:07:02,096 --> 00:07:05,416 And then also the FAA safety team has a a 91 00:07:05,416 --> 00:07:09,576 course on the the fast team website. 92 00:07:09,576 --> 00:07:15,848 and that's the multi engine online course…That is if you wanted to pull this up it's ALC 93 00:07:15,848 --> 00:07:21,898 thirty So you can go to f a safety dot gov, and you can find the multi engine safety review 94 00:07:21,898 --> 00:07:25,498 course So that's another it's a free course you can go through. 95 00:07:25,498 --> 00:07:29,216 And and take that. The third link that I gave him 96 00:07:29,216 --> 00:07:33,936 was for the FAA's flying light twins safely. 97 00:07:33,936 --> 00:07:37,676 So this is a document It's if you just search FAA flying 98 00:07:37,676 --> 00:07:41,636 light twins safely, in Google and that'll be the first result. 99 00:07:41,636 --> 00:07:48,566 But the pamphlet number is eight seven four zero dash six six So that's f a a p 100 00:07:48,566 --> 00:07:52,368 eight seven four zero dash six six Flying light turns safely. 101 00:07:52,368 --> 00:07:58,696 this is also included in the Ace Guide which is a a guide that I sell on the website. 102 00:07:58,696 --> 00:08:03,446 And it's it's hyperlinked in there as well, as the commercial ACS and all the multi engine 103 00:08:03,446 --> 00:08:10,041 review stuff So if you don't have the Ace Guide that's a way to get all of these resources you know it's right there. 104 00:08:10,041 --> 00:08:16,531 but for the … the recommended reading materials that are out there those are kind of the three 105 00:08:16,531 --> 00:08:20,471 that I that I show everybody It's chapter thirteen of the airplane flying handbook flying light 106 00:08:20,471 --> 00:08:26,656 twin safely, and the multi engine, operations course that's there online for free. 107 00:08:26,656 --> 00:08:31,006 second I've done two videos on this And they're my longer format kind of 108 00:08:31,006 --> 00:08:35,791 typical, podcast slash, you know video show on YouTube. 109 00:08:35,791 --> 00:08:39,701 And that's the multi engine basics part one and part two. 110 00:08:39,701 --> 00:08:44,188 And I can put links in those in the show here but you can find those on the YouTube channel. 111 00:08:44,188 --> 00:08:50,796 Just search you know Seth Lake multi engine part one and part two and you'll see those track rides there. 112 00:08:50,796 --> 00:08:55,676 what I've talked about is basically you know I've kind of given the the big objective here of 113 00:08:55,676 --> 00:09:01,716 multi engine training is all about flying the aircraft safely when you have malfunctions and 114 00:09:01,716 --> 00:09:06,796 with a twin there's opportunity for more malfunctions first of all you've got two engines 115 00:09:06,796 --> 00:09:12,836 instead of one So you've got the asymmetric problem of a power if you lose one engine. 116 00:09:12,836 --> 00:09:19,446 Second is you have more systems typically so I'm willing to bet that the the listener here 117 00:09:19,446 --> 00:09:25,466 … got most of his ratings in a single engine non complex non high performance airplane That's 118 00:09:25,466 --> 00:09:30,486 what most people do Right You go to a flight school and you fly one seventy two or you fly an archer. 119 00:09:30,486 --> 00:09:35,611 And it's probably not complex It's not high performance It might be a TAA aircraft, but often 120 00:09:35,611 --> 00:09:39,303 that's, like you know fifty fifty I guess. 121 00:09:39,303 --> 00:09:43,023 And then you go to the multi and that's the first time you've flown complex and that's the first 122 00:09:43,023 --> 00:09:47,833 time you might have flown anything with over three hundred horsepower total Now Seminole for 123 00:09:47,833 --> 00:09:51,413 instance is around three hundred horsepower but it doesn't count as 124 00:09:51,413 --> 00:09:55,203 high performance because that's looking at the individual engines. 125 00:09:55,203 --> 00:10:01,183 So there's not a lot of high performance twin trainers … But I think for you know realistic 126 00:10:01,183 --> 00:10:05,823 purposes you know we can assume that hey if the plane has over three hundred horsepower it's 127 00:10:05,823 --> 00:10:10,473 gonna be there's other challenges involved there Right This is your first kind of faster 128 00:10:10,473 --> 00:10:15,131 airplane that you've flown So there's gonna there's gonna be a learning curve there for sure. 129 00:10:15,131 --> 00:10:20,981 To get used to So having the attitude that Norman has here of wanting to be as prepared as 130 00:10:20,981 --> 00:10:24,703 possible when you go into that training I think it's really good. 131 00:10:24,703 --> 00:10:30,921 And hopefully, he reaches back out when he's done December thirteenth That's only a couple weeks away. 132 00:10:30,921 --> 00:10:35,401 And these multi engine courses are typically pretty fast You can get a multi engine course done 133 00:10:35,401 --> 00:10:40,091 in you know three or four days pretty easily if you've got the examiner lined up and everything. 134 00:10:40,091 --> 00:10:44,753 So hopefully we get to hear from him in a couple of weeks and see how everything went. 135 00:10:44,753 --> 00:10:48,793 Alright Next, I've got a question from David. 136 00:10:48,793 --> 00:10:54,603 David says hi Seth and team wanted to write and inquire about MEI legality question. 137 00:10:54,603 --> 00:10:58,938 That is coming up And the answers I get seem to be circular. 138 00:10:58,938 --> 00:11:02,818 I thoroughly enjoy all your podcast and gain so much knowledge from utilizing you as a resource 139 00:11:02,818 --> 00:11:08,388 The VSL guide is the best seventy dollars I've ever spent in aviation I appreciate the kind words there David. 140 00:11:08,388 --> 00:11:12,358 Alright His question is, It pertains to the regulations for instructing 141 00:11:12,358 --> 00:11:16,338 a multi engine plane sixty one one ninety five f states. 142 00:11:16,338 --> 00:11:21,418 Flight instructor has at least five hours of piloting command time and specific make and model 143 00:11:21,418 --> 00:11:25,516 of multi engine airplane helicopter empowered lift as appropriate. 144 00:11:25,516 --> 00:11:29,276 My question is as far as make and model go is the make and 145 00:11:29,276 --> 00:11:33,336 model any aircraft covered under the TCDS of that aircraft. 146 00:11:33,336 --> 00:11:39,206 For example the PA twenty threes at our school has a PA twenty three in a and two PA twenty 147 00:11:39,206 --> 00:11:45,506 three dash two thirty fives If I've received my ME and MEI training in PA twenty three one sixty 148 00:11:45,506 --> 00:11:49,376 am I legal to instruct an any PA twenty three or must I have five hours of 149 00:11:49,376 --> 00:11:53,508 PIC… and every variation of the plane. 150 00:11:53,508 --> 00:11:58,178 Obviously I understand any answer you give is just a friendly advice not FAA legal interpretation. 151 00:11:58,178 --> 00:12:01,348 I just know I can probably get a good understanding from you much faster than the 152 00:12:01,348 --> 00:12:04,623 FAA responding to a request for inter notation. 153 00:12:04,623 --> 00:12:09,933 Well David you are right there I was able to get back to David pretty quickly on my thoughts on that. 154 00:12:09,933 --> 00:12:14,733 I I'm not aware of any legal interpretations that discuss this specifically. 155 00:12:14,733 --> 00:12:21,628 So I kinda went back to what my opinions are on this And the way that I… kind of interpret 156 00:12:21,628 --> 00:12:25,838 this is that the TCDS kind of the first part of that make and 157 00:12:25,838 --> 00:12:30,141 model question The PA twenty three is the make and model. 158 00:12:30,141 --> 00:12:36,521 The underlying variant so the PA twenty three dash two thirty five or a PA twenty three dash 159 00:12:36,521 --> 00:12:41,753 …three hundred If there is one I I forget I think that's the as tag The PA twenty three is the 160 00:12:41,753 --> 00:12:48,328 as tag…So the Aztec started with the Apache, and then they had the Aztec which is 161 00:12:48,328 --> 00:12:54,198 …basically the same fuselage different looking nose and then bigger engines. 162 00:12:54,198 --> 00:12:57,248 And then some of the systems in it changed as well. 163 00:12:57,248 --> 00:13:01,848 But for the most part it's it's the same airplane Right The controls are in the same place. 164 00:13:01,848 --> 00:13:07,128 Handing handling characteristics are similar Although, you know operating the the handling 165 00:13:07,128 --> 00:13:11,948 characteristics of the Aztec with larger engines is gonna be more difficult than a PA twenty 166 00:13:11,948 --> 00:13:15,178 three one fifty, which has a hundred and fifty horsepower engines 167 00:13:15,178 --> 00:13:18,598 versus the three three hundred horsepower engines. 168 00:13:18,598 --> 00:13:22,368 so…I've always looked at those as a variant. 169 00:13:22,368 --> 00:13:26,028 So not a category in class, specific or a make and 170 00:13:26,028 --> 00:13:30,373 model specific but just a variant of a make and model. 171 00:13:30,373 --> 00:13:35,223 and I kinda look at it the same way we do the the planes that we fly here at Southwest So we fly 172 00:13:35,223 --> 00:13:39,883 all seven thirty seven But we fly different variants of the seven thirty seven We have three We 173 00:13:39,883 --> 00:13:46,603 have the the seven thirty seven seven hundred, the eight hundred, and the max eight Those are 174 00:13:46,603 --> 00:13:51,123 the three that we have We're fixing to have four Hopefully once we get the max seven, So we're 175 00:13:51,123 --> 00:13:55,123 gonna have four variants of the seven thirty seven that we fly here. 176 00:13:55,123 --> 00:14:01,853 And there's no limitations on my certificate about, you know maintaining a certain 177 00:14:01,853 --> 00:14:04,943 amount of hours or landings in each one of those variants they're all 178 00:14:04,943 --> 00:14:08,328 basically treated as the same because they're the same type. 179 00:14:08,328 --> 00:14:11,438 So they're covered all under that same type certificate. 180 00:14:11,438 --> 00:14:17,678 So in my opinion the PA twenty three, the type certificate data sheet you know that's not the 181 00:14:17,678 --> 00:14:20,698 doesn't take a type certificate to fly an Aztec That's not what I'm saying 182 00:14:20,698 --> 00:14:24,693 , but they're all listed under there in that same document. 183 00:14:24,693 --> 00:14:30,413 Beachcraft has the same instance happened with the BeachCraft Travel Air and Baron series So the 184 00:14:30,413 --> 00:14:33,941 Travel Air… is a be ninety five. 185 00:14:33,941 --> 00:14:40,148 And then all of the barons that were variants of the travel air came out later and they're all be ninety five. 186 00:14:40,148 --> 00:14:47,068 And then they, the be ninety five fifty eight for instance is … So the baron has 187 00:14:47,068 --> 00:14:52,826 kind of a similar, I guess problem, but I've got it pulled up right here If you're with us on 188 00:14:52,826 --> 00:14:58,496 YouTube you can see the TCDS but the type certificate data sheet number for the baron is three 189 00:14:58,496 --> 00:15:02,026 alpha one six And I'll pull up the one for the Aztec as well. 190 00:15:02,026 --> 00:15:05,821 But you can see that the be ninety five a was 191 00:15:05,821 --> 00:15:10,321 the the kind of the original travel error that came out. 192 00:15:10,321 --> 00:15:17,091 And then included on here the the straight ninety five you got the d fifty five the the ninety 193 00:15:17,091 --> 00:15:23,161 five dash B fifty five a and then the G fifty eight So the G fifty eight is the baron that they 194 00:15:23,161 --> 00:15:29,081 currently produce Now textron doesn't make a lot of barons I think they only made like one last year. 195 00:15:29,081 --> 00:15:32,551 But I think it's interesting that…in nineteen fifty eight they 196 00:15:32,551 --> 00:15:36,701 started building the travel air which is the original ninety five model. 197 00:15:36,701 --> 00:15:41,791 They went on to do the the B ninety five the B ninety five a and then you know eventually 198 00:15:41,791 --> 00:15:45,321 they've made all the barons minus the pressurized baron and the turbo 199 00:15:45,321 --> 00:15:48,868 truck baron are all on the same type certificate. 200 00:15:48,868 --> 00:15:55,658 So this is maybe a slightly different… argument here because you could argue that although 201 00:15:55,658 --> 00:16:01,426 they're on the same type certificate datasheet they have different, model names. 202 00:16:01,426 --> 00:16:06,193 So this makes it even more confusing because the g 203 00:16:06,193 --> 00:16:11,143 fifty eight doesn't have the moniker of ninety five in it at all. 204 00:16:11,143 --> 00:16:16,903 But if you look at some of the early barons they were a ninety five model barons dash b fifty 205 00:16:16,903 --> 00:16:23,033 five So that you could argue is just a variant of the travel error … this answers a little quest 206 00:16:23,033 --> 00:16:29,313 you know… This answer is a little tricky for me to give because I don't wanna go out and just 207 00:16:29,313 --> 00:16:33,243 be too liberal with it and get anybody into any trouble. 208 00:16:33,243 --> 00:16:38,086 I also am hesitant to ask for a legal interpretation on this. 209 00:16:38,086 --> 00:16:44,666 Because, I'm afraid if the FAA errors too far on the conservative side it can make everyone's 210 00:16:44,666 --> 00:16:51,646 lives a lot easier or a lot lot more difficult that is … Now I got back to David with my 211 00:16:51,646 --> 00:16:57,666 answer and kind of my thought process on it And he said he was having basically the same conversation. 212 00:16:57,666 --> 00:17:03,078 And he said that he was definitely gonna be asking for a legal interpretation from the FAA. 213 00:17:03,078 --> 00:17:07,228 He said that he did call the Fizzdo and they told him that it's under one TCDS then you're good 214 00:17:07,228 --> 00:17:12,301 to go but that was a verbal phone call And I definitely, would love it in writing format so 215 00:17:12,301 --> 00:17:16,656 that others could use it in its more concrete answer. 216 00:17:16,656 --> 00:17:22,916 That's interesting that his the the Fizzo said hey if it's under the same TCDS then he's good to go. 217 00:17:22,916 --> 00:17:26,616 so let's pull up the actual TCDS and see what it has to say. 218 00:17:26,616 --> 00:17:32,051 So I've got the TCDS is one alpha one zero. 219 00:17:32,051 --> 00:17:38,656 So you can see here on the TCDS we have, we have one two three four five six 220 00:17:38,656 --> 00:17:44,131 variants of the Aztec are on the same TCDS. 221 00:17:44,131 --> 00:17:50,801 Now looking at the TCDS or the the variant names they all start with PA dash twenty three 222 00:17:50,801 --> 00:17:56,268 minus the last one which is a PA dash e twenty three So that's kinda interesting. 223 00:17:56,268 --> 00:18:02,636 So we we've got all these different aircraft on the same TCDS… and they are a little different 224 00:18:02,636 --> 00:18:08,526 Right A a PA twenty three, you know straight twenty three is actually called an Apache. 225 00:18:08,526 --> 00:18:12,528 So we can find it right here. This is your first model PA 226 00:18:12,528 --> 00:18:16,831 twenty three approved in nineteen fifty four So that's the Apache. 227 00:18:16,831 --> 00:18:21,981 it only had, two zero three twenties in it So it wasn't even I think it was a hundred and fifty 228 00:18:21,981 --> 00:18:28,786 horsepower, per side So who was a very…low powered or you know minimal 229 00:18:28,786 --> 00:18:32,436 powered twin engineer craft Interestingly enough the 230 00:18:32,436 --> 00:18:36,356 Apache was the first purpose built twin that I'm aware of. 231 00:18:36,356 --> 00:18:40,311 Most of the other twins… In fact the all all the 232 00:18:40,311 --> 00:18:44,371 twins that I know of are all kind of variants of a single engineer craft. 233 00:18:44,371 --> 00:18:49,501 So for example the the beach craft baron which we'll look at here in a second is just a variant 234 00:18:49,501 --> 00:18:54,773 of the beach craft bonanza Now to make things more confusing there is a twin bonanza which is 235 00:18:54,773 --> 00:19:00,173 totally different than the bonanza, the single engine bonanza and it's totally different than the baron. 236 00:19:00,173 --> 00:19:03,346 But anyway the the baron is just or the traveler more 237 00:19:03,346 --> 00:19:07,821 specifically is a variant of the Benanza airframe. 238 00:19:07,821 --> 00:19:11,991 The seminal is just a variant of the 239 00:19:11,991 --> 00:19:19,291 kind 240 00:19:19,291 --> 00:19:23,611 of the seminal 241 00:19:23,611 --> 00:19:28,081 is just a variant of the Cherokee and Archer fleet Right? 242 00:19:28,081 --> 00:19:31,651 and the Seneca is just a variant of the Cherokee six It's 243 00:19:31,651 --> 00:19:35,751 basically the Cherokee Sixty slots and you put two engines on it instead of one. 244 00:19:35,751 --> 00:19:42,741 So all of the most common twins are just variants of a single engineer craft except the Piper 245 00:19:42,741 --> 00:19:46,666 Apache which was the first purpose built twin. 246 00:19:46,666 --> 00:19:51,626 at any rate looking at this TCDS I would say yeah we can make the argument that since they all 247 00:19:51,626 --> 00:19:56,236 start with PA twenty three and they're all listed under the same TCDS then I would be okay with 248 00:19:56,236 --> 00:20:00,966 this But now let's look at the Baron TCDS We have kind of a similar problem here. 249 00:20:00,966 --> 00:20:07,901 We have a lot more aircraft… on this TCDS and if you wanted to look this up it's three alpha 250 00:20:07,901 --> 00:20:13,146 one six as the type certificate datasheet for the Beach Craft Baron fleet. 251 00:20:13,146 --> 00:20:18,706 And all of the barons and travel errors minus two are listed on this TCDS. 252 00:20:18,706 --> 00:20:25,666 so we have…let's see That's six We have over a a dozen Probably fifteen different 253 00:20:25,666 --> 00:20:29,661 aircraft that are listed on this TCDS. 254 00:20:29,661 --> 00:20:35,691 And you can immediately see it's different than what the Aztec is because they have different, 255 00:20:35,691 --> 00:20:39,141 model names So we have a b ninety five a We have a g 256 00:20:39,141 --> 00:20:42,961 fifty eight We have a ninety five dash c fifty five. 257 00:20:42,961 --> 00:20:49,951 We have a d fifty five and it fifty six t c a fifty eight to fifty eight a We have a lot of different names on here. 258 00:20:49,951 --> 00:20:53,891 So if I was looking at this TCDS I would say yeah you need five 259 00:20:53,891 --> 00:20:58,111 hours…in each of these that have a different name. 260 00:20:58,111 --> 00:21:03,111 so the d fifty five and the d fifty five a they're basically the same They're just variants of 261 00:21:03,111 --> 00:21:09,268 the same aircraft But if you have d fifty five versus d fifty five a time, that would still 262 00:21:09,268 --> 00:21:13,758 count for the e fifty five or e fifty five a That's the fifty five series. 263 00:21:13,758 --> 00:21:19,648 Right? But then it gets more complicated because we have the ninety five which is the original 264 00:21:19,648 --> 00:21:24,601 travel error And then we have a ninety five dash fifty five Well that's a baron. 265 00:21:24,601 --> 00:21:31,441 So in that case I'm gonna on the conservative side and say since one is named the travelaire… 266 00:21:31,441 --> 00:21:37,828 and one is named the Baron, those are two different, models So I'm gonna need five hours in a 267 00:21:37,828 --> 00:21:41,896 travel air and then I'm also gonna need five hours in a baron. 268 00:21:41,896 --> 00:21:48,858 Now moving from a baron fifty five to a a baron c fifty five, I 269 00:21:48,858 --> 00:21:55,821 wouldn't say that I need five hours to fly the C fifty five because I've already flown a fifty five model baron. 270 00:21:55,821 --> 00:22:01,698 Now moving from a fifty five model baron to a fifty eight well that's a new…model Right It 271 00:22:01,698 --> 00:22:06,108 doesn't have the fifty five anywhere in the name It does exist on the same TCDS but I would 272 00:22:06,108 --> 00:22:12,368 still wanna on the side of caution here and say well I need fifty eight time I need five hours 273 00:22:12,368 --> 00:22:16,408 in the fifty eight But if I have five hours in the fifty eight then moving to the g fifty eight 274 00:22:16,408 --> 00:22:20,771 , Again that's just a fifty eight model so I only need five hours. 275 00:22:20,771 --> 00:22:26,531 So that's kind of how I would address this I wouldn't say just using the common sense, method 276 00:22:26,531 --> 00:22:31,878 here i wouldn't say that I need five hours in each specific variant. 277 00:22:31,878 --> 00:22:35,158 but kind of the main model and that's the travel error or the 278 00:22:35,158 --> 00:22:38,868 baron And then there's a fifty five baron and there's a fifty eight baron. 279 00:22:38,868 --> 00:22:42,488 I would you know you could probably make an argument that there's baron time If you've got five 280 00:22:42,488 --> 00:22:48,341 hours in a baron then you can fly off instructed a fifty five baron and you can instruct in a fifty eight bearing. 281 00:22:48,341 --> 00:22:53,011 the reason I break those down a little bit is there is a significant difference between a fifty 282 00:22:53,011 --> 00:22:57,901 five model bearing and a fifty eight bearing, both in systems and kind of the cockpit layout 283 00:22:57,901 --> 00:23:03,016 and where the passengers are and… the size of the engines as well. 284 00:23:03,016 --> 00:23:08,646 So that's that's kind of my answer for that It's not a great answer i can't say that I'm just 285 00:23:08,646 --> 00:23:14,706 excited that, I've I've boiled it down to the to the exact solution here. 286 00:23:14,706 --> 00:23:20,856 So I think maybe an answer from the FAA via a legal interpretation might be good I I did caution 287 00:23:20,856 --> 00:23:27,841 David though I'm not…a huge fan…all the time of a legal interpretation because 288 00:23:27,841 --> 00:23:34,801 legal interpretations tend to have the the trend of kinda getting away from us So we we've got a 289 00:23:34,801 --> 00:23:41,536 very specific niche question that we have, and it goes through the wickets to get the 290 00:23:41,536 --> 00:23:46,376 legal interpretation out And what winds up happening is we get this very broad legal 291 00:23:46,376 --> 00:23:49,511 interpretation…that has second and third order effects that we 292 00:23:49,511 --> 00:23:52,951 didn't anticipate and it makes everyone's lives a lot harder. 293 00:23:52,951 --> 00:23:58,631 So I actually suggested if if David can get a solution in writing from his Fizzo saying hey this 294 00:23:58,631 --> 00:24:04,861 is this is what we're comfortable with, or reach out to also AOPA because AOPA might have some 295 00:24:04,861 --> 00:24:10,511 solutions on this as well, of historical data and they can say Hey here's an email we got in 296 00:24:10,511 --> 00:24:14,033 writing that, this is the FA stance on this. 297 00:24:14,033 --> 00:24:19,253 What I would recommend to all your instructors out there if you're flying a new model and has 298 00:24:19,253 --> 00:24:23,743 just a different name So you're flying a baron versus a travel area I would get five hours in a 299 00:24:23,743 --> 00:24:28,723 baron and and not count that towards the travel error and you also need five hours in the travel 300 00:24:28,723 --> 00:24:33,873 error Just because they're on the same type certificate datasheet that doesn't pass the smell test for me. 301 00:24:33,873 --> 00:24:39,451 So hopefully, that's clear as mud for everyone. and that's that question there. 302 00:24:39,451 --> 00:24:45,881 Okay Next I'm gonna get to a little article that I wrote on Reddit I did this about six days ago. 303 00:24:45,881 --> 00:24:52,543 and the title of the article is the reality of being a DPE challenges misconceptions, and solutions. 304 00:24:52,543 --> 00:24:57,006 So I've written a couple of different articles, and I call them articles but they're just 305 00:24:57,006 --> 00:25:02,586 longer form posts And I like to post those on Reddit because, Reddit is like Google searchable 306 00:25:02,586 --> 00:25:07,061 and I think it has maybe a broader audience than Facebook does. 307 00:25:07,061 --> 00:25:11,901 and, you know I kind of I don't know I just like the format for some reason. 308 00:25:11,901 --> 00:25:18,311 So… the gist of this post is trying to explain why there's so many 309 00:25:18,311 --> 00:25:25,306 challenges in scheduling a check ride right now And and specifically, there's challenges for 310 00:25:25,306 --> 00:25:29,436 that because it's challenging to be a designated pilot examiner. 311 00:25:29,436 --> 00:25:32,936 I know a lot of people think that the DPE system is just totally broken 312 00:25:32,936 --> 00:25:36,576 , and I would argue that the data doesn't really support that. 313 00:25:36,576 --> 00:25:41,606 And the reason I say that is because in twenty twenty three we've got the airman statistics 314 00:25:41,606 --> 00:25:48,576 report that came out earlier this this year … And it essentially… and it essentially tells us 315 00:25:48,576 --> 00:25:53,376 that we conducted you know more check rides in twenty twenty three 316 00:25:53,376 --> 00:25:58,246 than at any other point in history as far back as I could see. 317 00:25:58,246 --> 00:26:04,206 we did a tremendous number of check ride last of check rides last year 318 00:26:04,206 --> 00:26:10,316 … So saying that we have a broken system I don't think is really accurate I don't think the 319 00:26:10,316 --> 00:26:15,646 system is broken I just think we have it kind of a traffic jam in the current system. 320 00:26:15,646 --> 00:26:20,181 And the analogy that I used is you know if you're driving along and you hit you know, 321 00:26:20,181 --> 00:26:25,711 standstill traffic on the interstate, you don't throw your hands in the air and say, I can't 322 00:26:25,711 --> 00:26:30,441 believe the interstate system is fundamentally broken and it just it doesn't work at all We need 323 00:26:30,441 --> 00:26:34,411 to tear all the interstates down and rebuild them from the ground up. 324 00:26:34,411 --> 00:26:39,191 I don't think most rational people would think of a traffic jam that way They would think of it 325 00:26:39,191 --> 00:26:45,321 as Oh man there was an externality that happened to car accident construction whatever. 326 00:26:45,321 --> 00:26:50,411 And we've got a momentary breakdown of the system where it's not working as intended. 327 00:26:50,411 --> 00:26:56,486 But for the most part the the core system does work we just have, an external problem that's 328 00:26:56,486 --> 00:27:00,726 affecting the system right now And this is a temporary problem. 329 00:27:00,726 --> 00:27:06,136 So I think the same thing is is true for the DPE system The the designated or the designee 330 00:27:06,136 --> 00:27:12,671 system the FAA used for around sixty years… and it's worked I think pretty successfully. 331 00:27:12,671 --> 00:27:17,201 But the problem is we have a record number of people going through training. 332 00:27:17,201 --> 00:27:24,091 And so to prove that I kind of went into the data…and talked about some of the average tests 333 00:27:24,091 --> 00:27:31,083 …So, let's just look at some of these numbers So, break down the numbers like this … 334 00:27:31,083 --> 00:27:36,183 The FAA's twenty twenty three airman statistics show that examiners conducted a one thousand 335 00:27:36,183 --> 00:27:42,353 hundred and forty eight thousand five hundred and seven tests last year … The FAA's twenty 336 00:27:42,353 --> 00:27:46,803 twenty three airman statistics show that examiners conducted about hundred and forty eight 337 00:27:46,803 --> 00:27:53,803 thousand five hundred and seven tests last year excluding ATP tests conducted by part one forty two facilities. 338 00:27:53,803 --> 00:28:00,163 So I'll pause right there. what that means is… let's say you you're at an airline like 339 00:28:00,163 --> 00:28:07,103 SkyWest Well SkyWest can give you your a ATP your original issuance ATP certificate…associated 340 00:28:07,103 --> 00:28:13,118 with your type rating in one of their planes for their…part one twenty one and that's during 341 00:28:13,118 --> 00:28:18,118 part one forty two facility That does use a designee but typically the designee, the check 342 00:28:18,118 --> 00:28:24,108 airman that gives you that check ride Although they are technically a designee…they are also 343 00:28:24,108 --> 00:28:27,698 not part of the designees that give check rides to 344 00:28:27,698 --> 00:28:31,288 you know just private pilots and such. 345 00:28:31,288 --> 00:28:36,508 So I didn't wanna include those tests in there So it's a hundred and forty eight thousand number 346 00:28:36,508 --> 00:28:42,798 That is purely, you know private commercial instrument, multi you know your regular DPEs 347 00:28:42,798 --> 00:28:47,368 … so we have about twelve hundred active examiners in the US. 348 00:28:47,368 --> 00:28:51,838 And then I also point out that that's part of the struggle right here is it's hard to say how 349 00:28:51,838 --> 00:28:57,138 many examiners we actually have in the US because the DMS system doesn't track it very well 350 00:28:57,138 --> 00:29:02,556 honestly so I really don't know how many we have but I think it's around twelve hundred. 351 00:29:02,556 --> 00:29:06,086 So based on my observations and experiences the breakdown looks something like this About 352 00:29:06,086 --> 00:29:11,326 sixteen percent of examiners, so that's about a hundred and ninety two people are full time and 353 00:29:11,326 --> 00:29:17,251 conduct around three hundred tests per year contributing to fifty seven thousand six hundred tests annually. 354 00:29:17,251 --> 00:29:21,761 The remaining eighty four percent around one thousand and eight individuals are part time 355 00:29:21,761 --> 00:29:28,283 conducting about ninety tests per year contributing to ninety thousand seven hundred and twenty tests annually. 356 00:29:28,283 --> 00:29:31,663 This lens closely with the twenty twenty three totals of a hundred and forty eight thousand 357 00:29:31,663 --> 00:29:37,163 three hundred and twenty tests So the all those statistics are basically saying that, of the 358 00:29:37,163 --> 00:29:42,508 hundred and forty eight thousand tests that were given…about … Of the hundred and forty eight 359 00:29:42,508 --> 00:29:47,808 thousand tests given, ninety thousand of them were done by kind of part time examiners and 360 00:29:47,808 --> 00:29:54,433 fifty thou or fifty seven thousand of them were conducted by full time examiners… And…here's 361 00:29:54,433 --> 00:29:58,963 the problem is there's been a seventy two percent increase in testing demand since twenty 362 00:29:58,963 --> 00:30:05,303 fourteen So since two thousand fourteen to two thousand and twenty three and and on into twenty 363 00:30:05,303 --> 00:30:10,648 four there's been about a seventy percent increase in demand. 364 00:30:10,648 --> 00:30:15,288 But the FAA hasn't hired seventy percent more examiners. 365 00:30:15,288 --> 00:30:20,288 in fact I don't think they've hired really any more maybe a hundred more than we had back in 366 00:30:20,288 --> 00:30:26,933 twenty fourteen… I I really don't know I don't I don't know the statistics so I probably shouldn't say that. 367 00:30:26,933 --> 00:30:31,743 But just based on my anecdotal knowledge of like my local thisto and the number of examiners I 368 00:30:31,743 --> 00:30:38,708 don't think there's been a a big increase of examiners at all… But there has been an incredible 369 00:30:38,708 --> 00:30:43,458 increase in flight training So I think what essentially is happening is we're looking at this 370 00:30:43,458 --> 00:30:50,338 log jam that's created by… this perceived, notion that there's a shortage of 371 00:30:50,338 --> 00:30:54,208 pilots and everybody is running out to get their ratings so they can enter 372 00:30:54,208 --> 00:30:58,328 this lucrative career field and become an airline pilot. 373 00:30:58,328 --> 00:31:04,683 And to make matters worse, over the past couple of years we've seen people go from getting you 374 00:31:04,683 --> 00:31:09,533 know starting flight training to being at a major airline within a four year time span I mean 375 00:31:09,533 --> 00:31:14,908 just incredible That that has never happened in the industry before. 376 00:31:14,908 --> 00:31:21,513 And I I'm not… disparaging those people at all those people earned what 377 00:31:21,513 --> 00:31:27,123 they what they did Right They worked really hard and they were able to be at the right place and the right time. 378 00:31:27,123 --> 00:31:32,283 But that's that's the main thing is they were at the right place the right time in the industry 379 00:31:32,283 --> 00:31:36,903 And I don't think that will ever happen again honestly I don't think we'll see people go from 380 00:31:36,903 --> 00:31:43,378 finishing their flight training, as a student or or time building as a CFI… Do a touch and go 381 00:31:43,378 --> 00:31:48,888 for six months at a regional and then wind up at Delta I just don't think that's gonna happen anymore. 382 00:31:48,888 --> 00:31:55,653 But the fact that it did happen for about a year and a half or two years, that attracted a lot of people. 383 00:31:55,653 --> 00:32:01,163 And a lot of people started flight training A lot of people took out loans to do this flight training. 384 00:32:01,163 --> 00:32:04,788 And we've…created a lot of new pilots. 385 00:32:04,788 --> 00:32:09,958 So looking at the the number of pilots here I did a little bit of analysis on airline pilot 386 00:32:09,958 --> 00:32:13,528 central So look airline pilot central is there's this website. 387 00:32:13,528 --> 00:32:17,348 I'm not real sure where they get their numbers seem to be pretty accurate I compare it with the 388 00:32:17,348 --> 00:32:23,213 numbers that I have that I can see here at Southwest and the numbers they have posted there and it it's pretty accurate. 389 00:32:23,213 --> 00:32:29,303 So looking at that, I added up the all the people that work all the pilots that work at the top 390 00:32:29,303 --> 00:32:33,338 ten US airlines And I came up with a number…of 391 00:32:33,338 --> 00:32:37,898 around… seventy seven thousand pilots. 392 00:32:37,898 --> 00:32:43,153 So seventy seven thousand pilots work at the the top ten US airlines. 393 00:32:43,153 --> 00:32:47,723 now between twenty twenty and twenty twenty seven kind of looking at that time frame there And 394 00:32:47,723 --> 00:32:52,813 that's just…it's kind of a weird time range but that's the best that I could do looking, on 395 00:32:52,813 --> 00:32:58,053 on average at airline pilot central It has a projection of retirements there So looking at those 396 00:32:58,053 --> 00:33:03,088 projected retirements and those ten airlines, I see about thirteen thousand pilots are expected 397 00:33:03,088 --> 00:33:08,956 to retire in that time frame when they hit the mandatory age of sixty five. 398 00:33:08,956 --> 00:33:14,663 So, over the next decade we could extrapolate that out a little bit and just assume okay, in 399 00:33:14,663 --> 00:33:19,483 the decade of twenty twenty to two thousand thirty we'll see twenty thousand retirements. 400 00:33:19,483 --> 00:33:25,818 Okay? And then the FAA projects that the airline industry is gonna grow about two percent annually. 401 00:33:25,818 --> 00:33:31,018 So, applying this growth rate means okay we need seventeen thousand additional pilots to 402 00:33:31,018 --> 00:33:35,978 support expansion, and then combining the retirements, we can expect that we're we're gonna 403 00:33:35,978 --> 00:33:42,903 need to hire about thirty seven thousand pilots…into the top ten US airlines. 404 00:33:42,903 --> 00:33:48,628 Those don't include the regionals I'm talking about the the ULCCs, the low cost carriers the 405 00:33:48,628 --> 00:33:54,638 major airlines like Southwest, Spirit Allegiant frontier, and then of course the big legacies 406 00:33:54,638 --> 00:34:01,403 like American United Delta, Alaska and Hawaiian… And then you know Southwest is 407 00:34:01,403 --> 00:34:06,333 considered one you're we're the largest domestic airline so of course they're in there as well. 408 00:34:06,333 --> 00:34:10,483 So we need about thirty seven thousand pilots at the top end of the industry. 409 00:34:10,483 --> 00:34:17,218 And I think that's a good metric here because…In order for people to enter the regionals, 410 00:34:17,218 --> 00:34:21,208 they typically they enter the regionals they spend some time at the regionals and then they flow 411 00:34:21,208 --> 00:34:27,383 up into one of the major airlines So if the major airlines aren't hiring… 412 00:34:27,383 --> 00:34:33,793 the regional airlines probably aren't hiring either Now there is some attrition within the 413 00:34:33,793 --> 00:34:39,323 regionals right We have the lifers the guys that just fly in the regionals and then they age out 414 00:34:39,323 --> 00:34:42,773 and retire and the regionals need to hire people to replace them. 415 00:34:42,773 --> 00:34:47,353 But I would say that's the minority of pilots that do that The majority of pilots at the 416 00:34:47,353 --> 00:34:52,803 regional have some expectations to flow through to a major airline at some point. 417 00:34:52,803 --> 00:34:57,761 And and so going in with that assumption, I think the capacity for us to hire pilots over the 418 00:34:57,761 --> 00:35:02,283 next ten years is around thirty, thirty seven thousand pilots. 419 00:35:02,283 --> 00:35:09,193 Now looking at our trend line for how many commercial pilots that we've created over 420 00:35:09,193 --> 00:35:14,703 the or that we will create using the current trend lines that we will create from twenty twenty 421 00:35:14,703 --> 00:35:21,054 to twenty thirty will create around a hundred and nine thousand new commercial pilots. 422 00:35:21,054 --> 00:35:27,823 we're gonna issue around a hundred and one thousand ATP certificates… So this is kinda 423 00:35:27,823 --> 00:35:34,193 concerning to me and I've also accounted for…about I think twenty percent of those pilots 424 00:35:34,193 --> 00:35:38,728 looking at the raw numbers I've taken twenty percent off to assume that those are foreign, 425 00:35:38,728 --> 00:35:43,268 trained pilots So you know people from China and India that have come to the United States they 426 00:35:43,268 --> 00:35:46,638 get issued a commercial certificate but they're not gonna use it in our market They're gonna 427 00:35:46,638 --> 00:35:50,603 take it to a foreign country So I didn't want to include that. 428 00:35:50,603 --> 00:35:57,503 so I I know I just did a, basically a guess at that You know I I don't know how many there are. 429 00:35:57,503 --> 00:36:03,563 It could be fifty percent. But even at fifty percent, we're still probably around fifteen to 430 00:36:03,563 --> 00:36:07,848 twenty thousand pilots too heavy for this decade. 431 00:36:07,848 --> 00:36:14,486 So what I think of what we're seeing here basically after saying all these statistics…is… 432 00:36:14,486 --> 00:36:20,213 that we're what we're experiencing is an overcorrection, which is totally expected Right That's 433 00:36:20,213 --> 00:36:25,083 not a surprise at all I think it's human nature to overcorrect in a lot of different things that 434 00:36:25,083 --> 00:36:30,009 we do but especially in something as complex as a hiring market. 435 00:36:30,009 --> 00:36:36,159 we see all these news articles about how there's a pilot shortage We've got all these 436 00:36:36,159 --> 00:36:41,389 influencers online that are showing how awesome it is to be a pilot And and being a pilot is a 437 00:36:41,389 --> 00:36:46,509 lot of fun Right It beats working for a living It's great You know we we get to travel a lot We 438 00:36:46,509 --> 00:36:51,519 get incredible views We get to operate complex machinery And there's a lot of great things about 439 00:36:51,519 --> 00:36:57,151 this industry And of course the pay is not bad at all either We're we're kind of a great collar. 440 00:36:57,151 --> 00:37:01,401 workforce meaning that we're somewhere between blue collar and white collar but a gray collar 441 00:37:01,401 --> 00:37:05,248 you know you're making…really good money as a captain. 442 00:37:05,248 --> 00:37:11,991 Now you're not making just incredible amounts of cash as a regional airline first officer. 443 00:37:11,991 --> 00:37:17,151 But the payoff is well if I get to a major airline and have a twenty year career there you know 444 00:37:17,151 --> 00:37:20,953 , those last…fifteen years when I'm a captain at 445 00:37:20,953 --> 00:37:25,103 Delta I'm gonna be making, you know high six figure numbers. 446 00:37:25,103 --> 00:37:30,533 And then the benefits are great So There's all these incentives to draw people to this industry. 447 00:37:30,533 --> 00:37:34,773 And traditionally it's been hard to get into this industry because it's very expensive but then 448 00:37:34,773 --> 00:37:41,523 we had companies come in and they were willing to finance that So we had people financing this… 449 00:37:41,523 --> 00:37:45,223 you know addiction of flying for us to to be 450 00:37:45,223 --> 00:37:49,103 able to get all of our ratings and and get the ratings quickly. 451 00:37:49,103 --> 00:37:54,373 And it it lowered the barrier of entry too So it allowed people you know that's the good thing 452 00:37:54,373 --> 00:37:59,063 about financing is you know people that didn't have the financial means ten years ago to enter 453 00:37:59,063 --> 00:38:04,403 this industry were able to enter it because of financing options which is kind of relatively new 454 00:38:04,403 --> 00:38:10,329 Anyway… what it created is this perfect storm of an overcorrection. 455 00:38:10,329 --> 00:38:13,573 We've we've just created too many pilots. 456 00:38:13,573 --> 00:38:19,803 And I I wanna be honest with you You know I I don't want to try to plaster over the fact 457 00:38:19,803 --> 00:38:24,918 that this is my genuine feeling This is that we've over corrected. 458 00:38:24,918 --> 00:38:29,348 I also don't want to cause a a panic with anybody You know if you're a private pilot and you're 459 00:38:29,348 --> 00:38:35,178 just getting started and and you've got a hundred twenty thousand dollar loan that you owe to a 460 00:38:35,178 --> 00:38:38,178 flight school and you're hearing me talking about thinking that you're 461 00:38:38,178 --> 00:38:41,303 never gonna have a job I don't think that's the case. 462 00:38:41,303 --> 00:38:46,603 What I think the case is gonna be is that you're going to spend much more time at the lower rung 463 00:38:46,603 --> 00:38:52,888 aviation jobs than you anticipated… And it's basically you're gonna spend the same amount of 464 00:38:52,888 --> 00:38:58,328 time there that we have had historically had to spend there Right so to take a person like 465 00:38:58,328 --> 00:39:02,198 myself I became a pilot in the air force in two 466 00:39:02,198 --> 00:39:06,544 thousand and seven, or sorry two thousand eight. 467 00:39:06,544 --> 00:39:12,234 And then, I've I've had to work basically from two thousand eight to two thousand eighteen 468 00:39:12,234 --> 00:39:15,603 until I was a professional pilot in civilian world. 469 00:39:15,603 --> 00:39:19,866 And then in finally twenty twenty three I became a major airline pilot. 470 00:39:19,866 --> 00:39:26,866 when I … so when I started at Southwest I got hired at thirty nine and that's kind 471 00:39:26,866 --> 00:39:32,606 of the average age that somebody's hired at Southwest or sorry I was thirty eight. 472 00:39:32,606 --> 00:39:35,836 but anyway that's that's kind of the average age of a new hire pilot at 473 00:39:35,836 --> 00:39:39,836 Southwest is thirty eight I had people in my class that were twenty three. 474 00:39:39,836 --> 00:39:46,236 twenty three was so far below the standard They just had no… I mean, they blew all of the 475 00:39:46,236 --> 00:39:49,536 other, new hire numbers out of the water. 476 00:39:49,536 --> 00:39:55,271 Nobody had been hired at twenty three And the same thing at Delta United it's just…It's 477 00:39:55,271 --> 00:40:00,851 unprecedented, region that we were in because we did have a legitimate shortage but because of 478 00:40:00,851 --> 00:40:03,851 all these good benefits I think we overcorrected. 479 00:40:03,851 --> 00:40:08,693 And so instead of being twenty three or twenty five when you started that major airline, you're 480 00:40:08,693 --> 00:40:12,596 probably gonna be thirty five when you started the major airline. 481 00:40:12,596 --> 00:40:16,456 and that kinda sucks especially if you thought, oh yeah I'm gonna 482 00:40:16,456 --> 00:40:20,598 be at Delta making two hundred thousand dollars within five years. 483 00:40:20,598 --> 00:40:26,488 That is not a realistic expectation anymore And I wanna make sure you as a a younger pilot 484 00:40:26,488 --> 00:40:30,231 understand that you might be at a regional… 485 00:40:30,231 --> 00:40:34,551 for ten years before you get the chance to go to a major airline. 486 00:40:34,551 --> 00:40:38,261 And I don't want you to think that that's like the end of the world or anything That's the way 487 00:40:38,261 --> 00:40:44,881 it's kind of always been… and I I think that is…it's just gonna be a reversion 488 00:40:44,881 --> 00:40:51,486 back to the mean is what it is It's just a reversion back how it's always been… So 489 00:40:51,486 --> 00:40:56,126 other things that I talked about in this post having to do with the shortage is the fact that 490 00:40:56,126 --> 00:41:02,316 the being a DPE is kind of tenuous in nature So it's really hard for DPE's to fully commit to 491 00:41:02,316 --> 00:41:08,981 being a full time DPE…because…the the same qualifications that make us qualified to be a 492 00:41:08,981 --> 00:41:14,911 DPE also make us qualified to fill other jobs in professional aviation and those other jobs tend 493 00:41:14,911 --> 00:41:18,521 to have more, consistency they have better 494 00:41:18,521 --> 00:41:22,976 benefits, and they're frankly they're just easier and safer. 495 00:41:22,976 --> 00:41:29,506 I can name probably four…fatal accidents off the top of my head that involved examiners in the 496 00:41:29,506 --> 00:41:33,181 past five years and there hasn't been one, 497 00:41:33,181 --> 00:41:37,031 US based one twenty one airline pilot lose their lives. 498 00:41:37,031 --> 00:41:41,066 And probably what Thirteen, fourteen years. 499 00:41:41,066 --> 00:41:46,496 so I mean it's it's much more dangerous being a DPE…than it is being an airline pilot. 500 00:41:46,496 --> 00:41:49,776 it's easier being an airline pilot than a DPE. 501 00:41:49,776 --> 00:41:53,926 the benefits are much better being an airline pilot than than being a 502 00:41:53,926 --> 00:41:59,196 DPE So, I think there's a perception out there that DPs are just doing it for the money. 503 00:41:59,196 --> 00:42:05,816 I don't think everybody has that opinion but I think there's a lot of people that that have that opinion. 504 00:42:05,816 --> 00:42:11,236 And I see it on Reddit especially this post just blew up with a lot of people that were frankly 505 00:42:11,236 --> 00:42:15,331 being kind of insulting… to me saying that, 506 00:42:15,331 --> 00:42:19,961 literally I'm a a con artist which was kind of interesting. 507 00:42:19,961 --> 00:42:25,601 at any rate, there there's haters in all industries and understand that but we aren't doing it for the money. 508 00:42:25,601 --> 00:42:31,191 And because we aren't doing it for the money we we have some other primary source of income. 509 00:42:31,191 --> 00:42:36,476 That's kind of our primary job. So we have to treat DPE as a part time job. 510 00:42:36,476 --> 00:42:42,206 and as long as you're relying on part time people to fulfill huge increase in demand. 511 00:42:42,206 --> 00:42:46,556 That's gonna be a problem But when it normalizes back out and we go back to kind of twenty 512 00:42:46,556 --> 00:42:51,646 fourteen levels of training, you're not gonna see three months wait time for a check ride You 513 00:42:51,646 --> 00:42:56,426 just weren't aren't because there there's not gonna be that many pilots getting check rides anymore. 514 00:42:56,426 --> 00:43:02,256 anyway anyway I think I've ranted on this long enough If you want to, go to Flying R slash 515 00:43:02,256 --> 00:43:07,106 Flying on Reddit and you can find, my handle on there is beach dude. 516 00:43:07,106 --> 00:43:12,326 But the reality of being a DPE if you just search for that, you can pull that up and read the 517 00:43:12,326 --> 00:43:15,591 post and read the comments Comments are kinda interesting. 518 00:43:15,591 --> 00:43:19,001 hopefully enjoy that Alright Last we will get to 519 00:43:19,001 --> 00:43:22,808 a this is a post made in R slash line of Reddit. 520 00:43:22,808 --> 00:43:26,536 And the question was from Dolan nine seven seven. 521 00:43:26,536 --> 00:43:31,206 Do twin props without a critical engine have a VMCA speed? 522 00:43:31,206 --> 00:43:38,078 Hi all I'm trying to figure out if twins without a critical engine have a VMCA speed as I've never flown one before. 523 00:43:38,078 --> 00:43:44,111 It's for an airline question and they asked does a plane without a critical engine have a redline speed? 524 00:43:44,111 --> 00:43:49,804 Lots of comments here So this was my answer and I'll just read this verbatim. 525 00:43:49,804 --> 00:43:55,436 so I said twins with counter rotating propellers still have published VMC…minimum control 526 00:43:55,436 --> 00:44:01,674 speed because the concept of VMC applies regardless of whether the engines are equally critical. 527 00:44:01,674 --> 00:44:08,101 The VMC definition assumes one engine is inoperative and windmilling, which directly affects controllability. 528 00:44:08,101 --> 00:44:12,351 And twins like the Piper seminal counter rotating propellers eliminate the differences in 529 00:44:12,351 --> 00:44:19,111 asymmetric thrust, produced by different engines meaning that neither engine is more critical than the other. 530 00:44:19,111 --> 00:44:22,426 However, this does not mean that these aircraft lack a 531 00:44:22,426 --> 00:44:27,058 BMC or that the concept of a critical engine is irrelevant. 532 00:44:27,058 --> 00:44:33,298 Instead each engine is equally critical, meaning the loss of either engine as a has a symmetric 533 00:44:33,298 --> 00:44:36,781 and equally adverse effect on controllability. 534 00:44:36,781 --> 00:44:40,371 The only aircraft that wouldn't have a VMC are certain are center 535 00:44:40,371 --> 00:44:44,121 line thrust twins such as the Sessna three three seven. 536 00:44:44,121 --> 00:44:48,421 And these designs engine placement eliminates yawing moments caused by asymmetric thrust making 537 00:44:48,421 --> 00:44:53,679 a VMC unnecessary because losing a one engine doesn't impair directional control. 538 00:44:53,679 --> 00:44:57,089 As for the seminal, Piper's claim that it eliminates the 539 00:44:57,089 --> 00:45:00,821 critical engine factor is more of a marketing statement. 540 00:45:00,821 --> 00:45:06,331 While a counter rotating propellers equalize the criticality of the engines VMC still exists 541 00:45:06,331 --> 00:45:12,016 because its definition relies on one engine being windmilling and the other producing power. 542 00:45:12,016 --> 00:45:17,036 From testing a typical light twin with non counter rotating propellers requires about seventy 543 00:45:17,036 --> 00:45:21,626 pounds of rudder force to hold heading with the critical engine inoperative and about forty 544 00:45:21,626 --> 00:45:24,681 pounds with a noncritical engine inoperative. 545 00:45:24,681 --> 00:45:29,561 For seminal it's reasonable to estimate that around forty pounds of Redder force would be 546 00:45:29,561 --> 00:45:33,261 required to maintain heading with either in engine inoperative. 547 00:45:33,261 --> 00:45:37,861 In contrast an aircraft like the P thirty eight lightning with propellers rotating away from the 548 00:45:37,861 --> 00:45:42,601 centerline of gravity might require a hundred to hundred and fifty pounds of rudder force to hold heading. 549 00:45:42,601 --> 00:45:47,231 Bottom line, all multi engine aircraft with wing mounted engines even those with counter 550 00:45:47,231 --> 00:45:51,221 rotating props, have a critical engine or equally 551 00:45:51,221 --> 00:45:55,661 critical engines and almost all of them have a published VMC. 552 00:45:55,661 --> 00:45:58,771 So that is my answer to this question. 553 00:45:58,771 --> 00:46:02,801 And I was I was happy with this. so let's talk about the Sesame three three seven for a second 554 00:46:02,801 --> 00:46:08,156 If you're flying a an aircraft that doesn't have a published VMC, you will have a restriction 555 00:46:08,156 --> 00:46:13,646 on the back of your certificate So if if you get your training in this so if you let's say you 556 00:46:13,646 --> 00:46:20,761 go train in a cessna three three seven which is a push pull configuration It's got engine on the front engine on the back. 557 00:46:20,761 --> 00:46:24,761 it is centerline thrust So it doesn't have a published VMC. 558 00:46:24,761 --> 00:46:28,631 So if you get your multi engine rating you know three three seven you will have a restriction on 559 00:46:28,631 --> 00:46:35,261 the back of your certificate that says restricted to centerline thrust only… A seminal does not 560 00:46:35,261 --> 00:46:42,051 have that restriction because the seminal does in fact have a published VMC… now Piper says 561 00:46:42,051 --> 00:46:46,079 hey it removes the critical engine factor. 562 00:46:46,079 --> 00:46:51,009 With having counter rotating propellers What Piper is really trying to explain there in the in 563 00:46:51,009 --> 00:46:54,019 the flight manual is that there's not one engine that's 564 00:46:54,019 --> 00:46:57,249 more critical than the others They're both equally critical. 565 00:46:57,249 --> 00:47:03,244 So that's…That's why I think there's some confusion about a counter rotating twin not having a 566 00:47:03,244 --> 00:47:08,424 critical engine A counter rotating twin has two critical engines They're both equally critical. 567 00:47:08,424 --> 00:47:15,016 So hopefully that clarifies that…Again there you there's some good discussions…on there but 568 00:47:15,016 --> 00:47:19,056 I think a lot of misconceptions i read there's you know thirty seven comments in total And a lot 569 00:47:19,056 --> 00:47:23,536 of those comments…were from people saying oh I I didn't think of someone all had a critical 570 00:47:23,536 --> 00:47:27,956 end thought only you know P thirty eight has two critical engines and a seminal doesn't have any 571 00:47:27,956 --> 00:47:33,291 And the answer is no They they both have critical engines and they're both equally critical. 572 00:47:33,291 --> 00:47:38,741 it's just a a seminal would only require a low amount of rudder force while a P38 would require 573 00:47:38,741 --> 00:47:43,766 higher… anyway that's that. 574 00:47:43,766 --> 00:47:50,596 let me pull up, discord here I don't see any chats in Discord I do have a question here in 575 00:47:50,596 --> 00:47:55,146 Discord a live question This would be fun … Alright This is 576 00:47:55,146 --> 00:48:00,176 from Satvere When flying an LTV approached is there critical? 577 00:48:00,176 --> 00:48:07,146 Is there… when flying an LP approach, is there criteria…on when your GPS has 578 00:48:07,146 --> 00:48:12,396 to pick up LP signal For example if ATC clears me direct to the initial approach fix I use their 579 00:48:12,396 --> 00:48:19,131 direct function…GPS in terminal mode … Alright Well that's the questions I'll 580 00:48:19,131 --> 00:48:23,661 handle this week I've been going for, close to an hour now so I'll try to cut it off here and 581 00:48:23,661 --> 00:48:29,356 not make it too long winded…I've got I'm doing a PM flight I've got two legs today wind up in 582 00:48:29,356 --> 00:48:35,596 Seattle and then home on Monday… So that's what I'm doing the next two days 583 00:48:35,596 --> 00:48:40,176 … Anyway I've been going about an hour I think I'll wrap it up here. 584 00:48:40,176 --> 00:48:46,236 I've got two … Anyway I've been going about an hour I think I'll wrap it up here for this week's 585 00:48:46,236 --> 00:48:51,966 episode Thank you so much for joining us I am on my way to Seattle eventually tonight I have two 586 00:48:51,966 --> 00:48:56,876 legs tonight Two more legs tomorrow and it's Go Home Day tomorrow So looking forward to that. 587 00:48:56,876 --> 00:49:02,396 this coming week I've got probably four Checkcred scheduled back at home and then start another 588 00:49:02,396 --> 00:49:08,478 Southwest trip next Monday So I'll be on the road to do next week's episode. 589 00:49:08,478 --> 00:49:11,638 Then. Hope you'll join me then and send in your questions to 590 00:49:11,638 --> 00:49:15,946 sethlakevSL dot arrow You can check out our discord channel as well. 591 00:49:15,946 --> 00:49:19,706 this will be posted on YouTube So if you post the YouTube comments I'll try to pull up some of 592 00:49:19,706 --> 00:49:23,856 the YouTube comments and get some interaction that way There but the more questions are better I 593 00:49:23,856 --> 00:49:27,176 love answering everyone's questions like that interactivity there 594 00:49:27,176 --> 00:49:32,146 … Anyway, thank you so much for listening or watching. 595 00:49:32,146 --> 00:49:35,586 don't forget to like and subscribe Tell your friends about the podcast. 596 00:49:35,586 --> 00:49:39,176 And look forward to hearing your feedback We'll see you…