#19 | MH370 Solved: Full Evidence Review | Hard Truths

<v Speaker 1>Malagion three times zero contacted to zero dismal Niners.
<v Speaker 2>Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with two hundred
<v Speaker 2>and thirty nine people on board, including four Americans, has
<v Speaker 2>gone missing.
<v Speaker 1>I remembered the line from the into scripture of the
<v Speaker 1>Batabadgitavish new.
<v Speaker 3>He was trying to.
<v Speaker 1>Persuade the prince that he should do his duty, and
<v Speaker 1>we impressed him.
<v Speaker 3>Takes on multi armed form and says now I am
<v Speaker 3>become death, the destroyer of worlds.
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody for being here with me tonight. Tonight
<v Speaker 1>we are going to go straight into the evidence and
<v Speaker 1>then I will address questions at the end. So please
<v Speaker 1>hold your questions to the end. Tonight, on the anniversary
<v Speaker 1>of Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero, I have updated
<v Speaker 1>the list of all evidence in the case of my
<v Speaker 1>investigation for the last year and a half in collaboration
<v Speaker 1>with MH three seventy X, the organization that I started
<v Speaker 1>to research the MH three seven zero videos. The only
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to say before we begin, so this
<v Speaker 1>is one clear is I am not scamming anyone or
<v Speaker 1>promote vading this idea because it's popular or for it
<v Speaker 1>to make money. For me, I one hundred percent believe
<v Speaker 1>the videos are real. Anyone claiming anything to the contrary
<v Speaker 1>should be considered a bad faith actor. The weight of
<v Speaker 1>evidence that the videos are authentic is overwhelming, beyond really
<v Speaker 1>any reasonable doubt. So the plan here is to go
<v Speaker 1>through that evidence right now with you guys, and hopefully
<v Speaker 1>convince the more people. So in the description of wherever
<v Speaker 1>you're watching or listening to this, you can find a
<v Speaker 1>link to this document. Right here there we go, and
<v Speaker 1>this document is the updated evidence link, and we start
<v Speaker 1>straight away with the videos. If you're watching this in
<v Speaker 1>video format, you can watch the videos right now on
<v Speaker 1>the screen. There are two leaked military videos that first
<v Speaker 1>appeared on a tiny YouTube channel in twenty fourteen and
<v Speaker 1>only gained popularity in August of twenty twenty three on
<v Speaker 1>the subreddit UFOs. That's where I found the videos. That's
<v Speaker 1>where this all began. The first video archive satellite video
<v Speaker 1>called satellite video Airliner and UFOs. There's an archive link.
<v Speaker 1>It's from a YouTube channel called regicided on. In the description,
<v Speaker 1>it says received March twelve, twenty fourteen, uploaded May nineteenth,
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. At least that was the published date, and
<v Speaker 1>then it says source protected in the metadata of this video.
<v Speaker 1>Even though it doesn't say MH three seven is there
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the description. In the metadata, it actually does
<v Speaker 1>say both flight three seven zero and Malaysia Airlines. So
<v Speaker 1>we know one hundred percent this video is connected to
<v Speaker 1>MH three seven zero just based on the timeline alone. Now,
<v Speaker 1>the second video that came out after this is a
<v Speaker 1>drone video, and this one says UAV captures Airliner and UFOs.
<v Speaker 1>This is also the oldest version is also from regicideed on,
<v Speaker 1>but this video is uploaded a few weeks later. In
<v Speaker 1>the description, it says receive June fifth, twenty fourteen, uploaded
<v Speaker 1>or published June twelfth, twenty fourteen, so there's a lag
<v Speaker 1>between they received it and when they uploaded it. According
<v Speaker 1>to the story of the videos, video shows airliner being
<v Speaker 1>followed by three unidentified spherical objects for a short time,
<v Speaker 1>then Airliner and ORBS vanish. This appears to be alt
<v Speaker 1>angle to previously submitted sat footage, and then there was
<v Speaker 1>a link there to the satooage, which now does not
<v Speaker 1>exist on the internet anymore. So. I also it's important
<v Speaker 1>to point out here as well that regicided a non
<v Speaker 1>made a Twitter account three days after the video is published.
<v Speaker 1>The first video first videos published May nineteenth, May twenty second,
<v Speaker 1>regicided a no On makes a Twitter account. We found
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter account and their posts, and on May twenty
<v Speaker 1>second they say please spread this video before it's pulled,
<v Speaker 1>with presumably a link to the video, and they tag
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people and they tag MH three seven
<v Speaker 1>zero in there as well, and then you can see
<v Speaker 1>June thirteenth, one day after they published it, or possibly
<v Speaker 1>the same day based on time zones alt angle of
<v Speaker 1>the airliner abductions received with a link. So if somebody
<v Speaker 1>was faking this, it's pretty odd like it was regisied
<v Speaker 1>and On involved on this. If regisided On is not
<v Speaker 1>involved in these videos being produced as fakes, then it's
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand how they could be fake at all,
<v Speaker 1>given the story of regisied On being the first person
<v Speaker 1>to have them on the internet. As far as we
<v Speaker 1>can tell, and the story registered On is telling here
<v Speaker 1>is pretty clear source protected, please spread this before it's pulled,
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, there's also alternate sources, but
<v Speaker 1>they all post state regisied and On. But important to
<v Speaker 1>point out the Vimeo link if you translated into English,
<v Speaker 1>says that regicided No was arguing for the validity of
<v Speaker 1>the videos with the other people. So it seems like
<v Speaker 1>everything goes back to registered on. Now details about these videos?
<v Speaker 1>Why are these videos so important? Well, right away, the
<v Speaker 1>evidence is absolutely overwhelming. In the bottom left corner, we
<v Speaker 1>can see it, says NROL twenty two. This was the
<v Speaker 1>first launch of the space based infrared system known as SIBBERS.
<v Speaker 1>We've probably heard about it, talked about it on Joe
<v Speaker 1>Rogan in two thousand and six, and we can clearly
<v Speaker 1>see coordinates after the satellite designation. Now spoiler, we've determined
<v Speaker 1>that this is a relay satellite because of its millennial orbit,
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what we need because that first video
<v Speaker 1>we saw is not simply a satellite video. It's something
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to find out is called whammy footage
<v Speaker 1>that takes fuse data from multiple sensors through relay satellites
<v Speaker 1>and beams it to ground based computers so it can
<v Speaker 1>produce basically a Google Video playback of the entire planet,
<v Speaker 1>this ultimate DVR of the entire world. Now there's a
<v Speaker 1>link in here to Sibber's video in this document where
<v Speaker 1>you can actually watch how these satellites are scanning the
<v Speaker 1>whole planet and then imagine how they would take that
<v Speaker 1>censor data and send it to ground based computers to
<v Speaker 1>produce essentially the video that you're seeing here of three
<v Speaker 1>seven zero. Their coordinates the coordinates are the absolute smoking gun,
<v Speaker 1>absolute undeniable smoking gun. The coordinates indicate the Nicobar Islands
<v Speaker 1>a straight shot from the last military radar points straight shot.
<v Speaker 1>You can see from the image here where I superimpose
<v Speaker 1>the radar the satellite coordinates over this image from a
<v Speaker 1>blog that had the actual picture from the Light Hotel
<v Speaker 1>of Malaysian military radar ploted over a Google Earth map.
<v Speaker 1>You can see how close it is. There's no chance
<v Speaker 1>of this being a coincidence. The fact that they have
<v Speaker 1>it here in a straight line means that what happened
<v Speaker 1>is the plane kept going It kept going straight, and
<v Speaker 1>then what we see happen in those videos is what
<v Speaker 1>happened into the plane. The coordinates are not tracking the
<v Speaker 1>plane because they don't change as the plane moves. They
<v Speaker 1>only change when the person moves the screen the Whammy footage.
<v Speaker 1>That's how the system works. They can just move it around.
<v Speaker 1>But when they move it around, it changes the coordinates.
<v Speaker 1>So the actual coordinates of the plane, the coordance in
<v Speaker 1>the video are not the plane. It's just somewhere nearby.
<v Speaker 1>It could be a huge area from what we looked up.
<v Speaker 1>It could be anywhere. It could be even one hundred
<v Speaker 1>kilometers or more. Also very important to point out that
<v Speaker 1>the satellite video is a screen recording of a window. Again,
<v Speaker 1>absolute smoking gun, undeniable proof. We can see the cursor
<v Speaker 1>come on the screen from off the screen. If you're
<v Speaker 1>on a computer, you've ever used the computer before, you
<v Speaker 1>would know this indicates that somebody has a window open,
<v Speaker 1>no question, undeniable. The cursor goes off the screen on
<v Speaker 1>multiple sides. This is a window on a much larger screen.
<v Speaker 1>They're recording the actual window. When they move the perspective around,
<v Speaker 1>they're moving the perspective around in the window. The screen
<v Speaker 1>recording is recording the window. You can tell you can
<v Speaker 1>watch them move it around. They're using like a middle
<v Speaker 1>mouse to cold down click and then move around the perspective,
<v Speaker 1>but they're still within the window with the cursor. This
<v Speaker 1>is impossible to fake. Far far too detailed. There's more
<v Speaker 1>details to come here as well, but I just wanted
<v Speaker 1>to point that out again. The satellite video is six
<v Speaker 1>frames per second. This is consistent with all the capabilities
<v Speaker 1>of WHAMMY technology, which when I've researched it recently, is
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between two and ten frames per second. So the
<v Speaker 1>satellite video being six frames per second is exactly within
<v Speaker 1>that capability for spot military spy capabilities. Six frames per
<v Speaker 1>second that you're seeing if you're watching this on your
<v Speaker 1>screen right now, and then here you can see as
<v Speaker 1>well that we found online researching it. That's exactly consistent
<v Speaker 1>with what we're seeing here. High scene coverage, high resolution,
<v Speaker 1>low frame rate, an example of WAMI sensor which is
<v Speaker 1>probably not as becau as the military on There're two hurts,
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty megapixels seen, coverage at least ten
<v Speaker 1>kilometers squared. My guess is it's much bigger than that.
<v Speaker 1>Wammy fuses data from multiple sources and relaze it. Now,
<v Speaker 1>I also want to point out that the clouds in
<v Speaker 1>that video move and evolve. Hold on, and there's actually
<v Speaker 1>a moment where the smoke is displacing the orbs. So
<v Speaker 1>if you click on the link, I've actually uploaded a
<v Speaker 1>clip of it, and you can see here that you
<v Speaker 1>can see or the the orb is displaced by the smoke.
<v Speaker 1>Here you can see the accurate fluid dynamics slowed it
<v Speaker 1>down and played it over multiple times. It's easier to
<v Speaker 1>see in the color amp or changed version, but if
<v Speaker 1>you look at the original you will be able to
<v Speaker 1>see it in the original as well. We've checked this.
<v Speaker 1>There may be other times where it happens. This is
<v Speaker 1>the most noticeable time. This detail would require a level
<v Speaker 1>of visual effects that is hard to imagine would be
<v Speaker 1>being used. Okay, now this zapp accurately illuminates the clouds
<v Speaker 1>in three dimensions. This is another detail that is undeniable.
<v Speaker 1>You can even see the light reflect off the nearby cloud.
<v Speaker 1>You can see it reflecting off the cloud. Naturally, anyone
<v Speaker 1>who's done visual effects would know that how difficult this
<v Speaker 1>would be to pull off, and to pull it off perfectly.
<v Speaker 1>The way that we see it in two videos from
<v Speaker 1>two different angles just adds a level of depth that
<v Speaker 1>shows it. This cannot be a picture that we're looking at.
<v Speaker 1>This is not two dimension what we're looking at. What
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at has depth that means it's three dimension.
<v Speaker 1>This rules out so many visual effects arguments, including most
<v Speaker 1>of the debunk attempts that have been attempted on these videos,
<v Speaker 1>do not consider the fact that this must be a
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional environment. Factually speaking, must be Satellite USA two
<v Speaker 1>two nine was at the right location at the right
<v Speaker 1>time with his sister satellite right overhead, and there's a
<v Speaker 1>link here you can actually watch the recreated flight path.
<v Speaker 1>We searched through it and search where satellites were and
<v Speaker 1>found that there's one right at the right time to
<v Speaker 1>be beaming data to be able to produce what we've
<v Speaker 1>got going on in the video. The drone is a
<v Speaker 1>General Atomics MQ variant. It's either m Q nine, MQ
<v Speaker 1>one c MQ twenty. Avenger actually came up, which I
<v Speaker 1>believe is controlled by the Navy. Very difficult to tell.
<v Speaker 1>They all look almost identical. The thermal drone camera has
<v Speaker 1>similar capabilities to a Westcam MX twenty. There's a link
<v Speaker 1>here as well if you want to watch and see
<v Speaker 1>you can tell it's got the same high resolution, smooth
<v Speaker 1>motion capabilities. When you're watching the drone video, there's actually
<v Speaker 1>accurate camera shake as the drone As the camera operator
<v Speaker 1>zooms in, you can see it in the beginning of
<v Speaker 1>the video, and input delay real input delay from the
<v Speaker 1>camera operator as well. So just a couple more details
<v Speaker 1>to point out. You can see that the thermal is
<v Speaker 1>a literal perfect overlay on just actually MH three seven zero.
<v Speaker 1>It's a real picture of the missing plane, so pretty
<v Speaker 1>much a perfect match. As I say, both videos are nighttime,
<v Speaker 1>proven proven by the fact that there are no shadows
<v Speaker 1>anywhere or directional lighting anywhere on any of the clouds.
<v Speaker 1>Extremely important to point that out. There are no shadows
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the video, and there's no directional lighting anywhere
<v Speaker 1>in any of the clouds. It's nighttime in the videos.
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people try to claim that it's daytime,
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just I want to say that our capabilities
<v Speaker 1>allow nighttime to look like daytime, especially in the computer
<v Speaker 1>generated DVR playback. The proximity of the drone and the
<v Speaker 1>multiple sensors recording the plane indicates that this was a
<v Speaker 1>military operation. Everybody keeps asking why was it recording. The
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is so simple, because it's an operation.
<v Speaker 1>It's the only reason why they were re recording in
<v Speaker 1>those videos, the only one. It's an operation. Let that
<v Speaker 1>sink in because I found the leaker of the videos.
<v Speaker 1>I found the leaker of the videos. Let me just
<v Speaker 1>let that sink in everybody who's listening right now. I
<v Speaker 1>found the leaker of the videos just through hard ass
<v Speaker 1>work myself in twenty twenty three October of twenty twenty three.
<v Speaker 1>That date is important. Remember that in October of twenty
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, I went public saying I found the leaker.
<v Speaker 1>It has to be this guy. He checks all the boxes.
<v Speaker 1>He was on one of the a wax that night
<v Speaker 1>during the operation. Has to be. He must have had
<v Speaker 1>an emotional reaction to see that and leak those videos
<v Speaker 1>like quickly to Regisi Nonsen, like he leaked them like
<v Speaker 1>a years later. He leaked at four days after. According
<v Speaker 1>to regisided On, he cropped the HUD data in the drone,
<v Speaker 1>and he cropped a satellite video the way he was
<v Speaker 1>tracking the plane so that we couldn't see the drone
<v Speaker 1>or potentially other assets that were in the area. There's
<v Speaker 1>probably more. He might have thought he was looking at
<v Speaker 1>UFOs or aliens like a lot of people do when
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at that, only to be later revealed to
<v Speaker 1>him that it was actually our technology. This is just hypothetical,
<v Speaker 1>but it matches the psychological profile of what might have
<v Speaker 1>happened for this week now. He was assigned the VPU
<v Speaker 1>two Wizard Special Projects Squadron in February of twenty fourteen.
<v Speaker 1>They do black operations. Okay, so we've already nailed the
<v Speaker 1>guy like right place, right time, right squadron. Right. That
<v Speaker 1>should be enough already. But there's more. He was an
<v Speaker 1>aviator lieutenant commander on the P eight Poseidon and locking
<v Speaker 1>Martin ethan EP three e aries two spy planes. These
<v Speaker 1>planes fuse collected intelligence for battlefield situational awareness. His role
<v Speaker 1>was to relay that battlefield situational awareness aka video and
<v Speaker 1>stuff to upper command. Lynn's lawyer was quoted saying the
<v Speaker 1>investigation into him began April second, twenty fourteen. That's a
<v Speaker 1>month after the plane disappeared. That's three two to three
<v Speaker 1>weeks after registered and unclaimed to oversee the videos. In
<v Speaker 1>May of twenty fourteen, Lynn accidentally left two flight manifests
<v Speaker 1>in his flight suit from a deployment that included search
<v Speaker 1>and rescue code names. So two months after Image three
<v Speaker 1>seven zero disappears, he gets caught with flight manifest He's
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to have that have search and rescue code
<v Speaker 1>names on them. What other It could only be M
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hadn't even happened yet at that point, That can
<v Speaker 1>only be MH three seven zero. Defense argued the classified
<v Speaker 1>information in question was available on the internet. I couldn't
<v Speaker 1>even believe I read this in an open news article.
<v Speaker 1>The Defense argued the classified information in question was available
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. And he was a Navy liaison to
<v Speaker 1>US Congress, meaning he was privy to the Navy's black
<v Speaker 1>program portfolio, all the black projects they had to get
<v Speaker 1>approved for Congress. Quietly, that was his job. So he
<v Speaker 1>was almost certainly exposed to this technology. What he leaked
<v Speaker 1>was so big it triggered a national security alert at
<v Speaker 1>the highest levels. Okay, so the reason why they were
<v Speaker 1>trying to come down on him as a spy. They
<v Speaker 1>were trying to come down on him as a spi
<v Speaker 1>because he triggered this you're alert. So they were trying
<v Speaker 1>to say that he was a spy. But the problem
<v Speaker 1>was they had to admit there was no evidence did
<v Speaker 1>he ever exchanged any information with anyone from China? So
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? If we add that up, that
<v Speaker 1>means he leaked something on the internet. Right, if you
<v Speaker 1>didn't leak anything to our adversary, who do you leak
<v Speaker 1>it to? Oh, the public? It had to have been
<v Speaker 1>leaked to the In fact, the defense admitted it. The
<v Speaker 1>defense admitted it. The defense admitted they leaked it to
<v Speaker 1>the public. Right here, he got abused. They forced him
<v Speaker 1>into pre trial detainment under questionable circumstances, and he got
<v Speaker 1>abused by the goon squad, held in pre trial detainment
<v Speaker 1>for over three hundred days. Why because the military was
<v Speaker 1>afraid that he was going to commit gray mail. Where
<v Speaker 1>the defendant says I'm just gonna blurt out national security
<v Speaker 1>information to CNA or during the trial, or you just
<v Speaker 1>charged me for less scary stuff, he must add something
<v Speaker 1>real serious that he didn't want people to know about, like, hmm,
<v Speaker 1>I leaked the H three seven zero videos. The United
<v Speaker 1>States government took the plane with some orbs. The judge
<v Speaker 1>said he had a dangerous pattern of disclosure of classified information,
<v Speaker 1>but didn't point to any disclosures of classified information to
<v Speaker 1>support that argument. It's weird, almost like there was only
<v Speaker 1>one big thing and that couldn't really show that took
<v Speaker 1>a plea deal, got a nine year sentence after the
<v Speaker 1>plea deal, after they threw away the espionage charges after that,
<v Speaker 1>still got nine years with three years suspended because he
<v Speaker 1>worked with the NCIS and the FBI, probably to clean
<v Speaker 1>up the leak of the H three seven zero videos
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that it never went public. That would
<v Speaker 1>be my guess for why he got three years shaved off.
<v Speaker 1>He appealed in his twenty nineteen appeal, stating that his
<v Speaker 1>sentence was too harsh, and the judge specifically argued that
<v Speaker 1>what he did was extremely serious. I've never seen a
<v Speaker 1>case like this ever that you could even compare to.
<v Speaker 1>I dare anyone out there to find one that is
<v Speaker 1>as odd as this. It can only point to something
<v Speaker 1>like the MH three seven zero videos. When I foyaed
<v Speaker 1>the NCIS, they rejected my foya in total to be
<v Speaker 1>kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.
<v Speaker 1>In total, they won't give me anything about it. But
<v Speaker 1>someone got in touch with Lynn's lawyer, Larry Younger, and
<v Speaker 1>they proved it by posting a voicemail from Younger too
<v Speaker 1>them trying to get back in touch with them for
<v Speaker 1>having missed their phone call. And the same day they
<v Speaker 1>posted the voicemail They posted that they had the conversation
<v Speaker 1>with Younger and asked about satellite video kind of covertly,
<v Speaker 1>and that Larry Younger said that the FED set brought
<v Speaker 1>satellite video into the case. If that statement can be corroborated,
<v Speaker 1>game over. He's the guy, why, because no one on
<v Speaker 1>this planet even knew we had satellite video unless you
<v Speaker 1>were already in black operations or you have been following me.
<v Speaker 1>I'm the guy that's been promoting that we have the
<v Speaker 1>satellite video capability through the research that I make three
<v Speaker 1>seventy X is done. There is nobody else that's been
<v Speaker 1>saying that we even predate the claims that were made
<v Speaker 1>in the November UFO hearing where it was finally admitted
<v Speaker 1>by Tim Galladett and Michael Schellenberger that the government has
<v Speaker 1>satellite video of UFOs, which would imply that we have
<v Speaker 1>salite video capabilities. So the first time it's ever publicly
<v Speaker 1>been stated, and we already proved it before that. So
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's satellite video being brought into Edward
<v Speaker 1>Lynn's case proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that
<v Speaker 1>he must be the guy. But there's one more thing
<v Speaker 1>that's not on here. I revealed his name in October
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three, publicly started saying his name on
<v Speaker 1>all the podcasts that he was the guy that leaked
<v Speaker 1>the videos and hopes that he would reach out to
<v Speaker 1>me and talk to me and do the right thing
<v Speaker 1>and say that he was the guy that leaked it
<v Speaker 1>and come forward and be a whistleblower. And in response,
<v Speaker 1>not only did he not reach out to me, and
<v Speaker 1>I know he got the message because I reached out
<v Speaker 1>to the law firm that represented him in October. He
<v Speaker 1>legally changed his name December twenty ninth, twenty twenty three,
<v Speaker 1>two two and a half months after I started publicly
<v Speaker 1>saying his name on podcast Instead of reaching out to me,
<v Speaker 1>he filed for a name change request from Edward Sea
<v Speaker 1>Lynn to Edward James Soriah. And it's interesting because when
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to his company and left a message
<v Speaker 1>that I'm sure got to him that he was my
<v Speaker 1>heroes what I wanted them to say. They all knew
<v Speaker 1>him as Edward Lynn, meaning he was not ashamed of
<v Speaker 1>being Edward Lynn. Everybody knows him as Edward Lynn is
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Lynn, So why would he put a name change request?
<v Speaker 1>And after he'd already got on our prison, he'd been working,
<v Speaker 1>had already started his own company. Everything's going fine, there's
<v Speaker 1>no reason to change your name. And then all of
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the guy says, you leaked these crazy videos,
<v Speaker 1>and it's saying Edward Sea Lynn leaked H three seven
<v Speaker 1>zero videos, and now all of a sudden changes his name.
<v Speaker 1>Lawyer won't respond phone calls or voicemail messages. I want.
<v Speaker 1>All I'm asking for is confirmation of the statement he's
<v Speaker 1>already made to somebody else. Edward Lynn won't respond. Family
<v Speaker 1>members won't respond. This is the behavior of guilty people,
<v Speaker 1>beyond any shadow of a doubt. Beyond any shadow of
<v Speaker 1>a doubt. This is not a joke. This is not
<v Speaker 1>a game. What I'm telling you right now is one
<v Speaker 1>real how to proceed. I don't know. We're in unsharded territories.
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing my best here as just a normal random
<v Speaker 1>guy that came across this information. Is clearly uncovered something
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely huge huge. So now the story of MH
<v Speaker 1>three seven zero. So this is a combination of what
<v Speaker 1>I think happened to the plane, and then some of
<v Speaker 1>the arguments for some the other planes are on the
<v Speaker 1>plane So there are two lengths here to the flight
<v Speaker 1>path video and flight path explain our video if you
<v Speaker 1>want to see both the flight path and understand it visually.
<v Speaker 1>And then my short explainer video is a little bit outdated,
<v Speaker 1>but still pretty accurate in terms of what I think happened.
<v Speaker 1>So first most important part is the plane didn't crash
<v Speaker 1>in the South Indian Ocean. No debris field found. Plane
<v Speaker 1>would have exploded. That thousands of pieces, whether or not
<v Speaker 1>I had fuel in there or not, hidden in the
<v Speaker 1>ocean from the sky. It's a massive, massive plane of
<v Speaker 1>Bowing triple seven. We did the most expensive search in
<v Speaker 1>history and didn't find anything above or below water. Let
<v Speaker 1>me make that clear. The search didn't find anything. Nothing. Ever,
<v Speaker 1>in eleven years, no black boxes were found, despite that
<v Speaker 1>they can produce signal below signal depths of twenty thousand feet.
<v Speaker 1>There's no problem that it wasn't below the signal depths
<v Speaker 1>of the black boxes. They found nothing. Ever, none of
<v Speaker 1>the four redundant emergency transponder beacons activated. They only activate
<v Speaker 1>on crash. None of them activated. The argument people make is, oh, well,
<v Speaker 1>it was like a They must the pilot must have
<v Speaker 1>just decided to like somehow perfectly land the plane on
<v Speaker 1>the ocean without triggering the ELTs. It's like it's just
<v Speaker 1>a continual like more and more excuses they have to
<v Speaker 1>be made for this, like tortured logic to try to
<v Speaker 1>continue to believe that somehow this plane went down to
<v Speaker 1>the South Indian Ocean. SOCAS system, the sound surveillance system
<v Speaker 1>by the Navy would have heard it, just like they
<v Speaker 1>heard the titan sub pop where the Navy said nothing
<v Speaker 1>for five days when the sub popped off the next
<v Speaker 1>of the Titanic, so that system one thousand percent so
<v Speaker 1>system would have heard Malaysian airlines crashing into the ocean.
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter where it literally anywhere on the planet, they
<v Speaker 1>would have heard it. It's a system they've had since
<v Speaker 1>like the fifties. There's a Cardiff University scientist I think
<v Speaker 1>paper that found no strong candidate signal acoustic detections. They
<v Speaker 1>even compared other historical situations, did the math for the
<v Speaker 1>mass of the plane under different speeds going into the ocean,
<v Speaker 1>and under all of those circumstances, both hydroacoustic systems within
<v Speaker 1>range should have heard the plane hit in the ocean.
<v Speaker 1>Neither of them did. The only acoustic dection when they
<v Speaker 1>tried to torture themselves into was over almost an hour
<v Speaker 1>after the plane would have ran out of fuel, which guys,
<v Speaker 1>planes don't fly without fuel, so can't possibly be that
<v Speaker 1>one either right off the bat, So no acoustic detection
<v Speaker 1>that so we have absolute scientific proof that the plane
<v Speaker 1>didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean. There's scientific proof.
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of people don't want to accept it.
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality of the situation, even after just no
<v Speaker 1>results after eleven years. Scientific proof that they're wrong doesn't matter,
<v Speaker 1>just people refuse to admit that they couldn't possibly that
<v Speaker 1>they've been lied to. I also want to point out
<v Speaker 1>that in the location where the plane supposedly was lost
<v Speaker 1>from radar, there's still five radars in range. This isn't
<v Speaker 1>a joke either. This is from the Royal Aeronautical Society
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen report. You can find on YouTube. Five radars
<v Speaker 1>in range. Still what I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
<v Speaker 1>So we're just gonna pretend like the plane was lost
<v Speaker 1>from radar when there's no way it possibly could have
<v Speaker 1>been lost from radar where they're claiming it does not
<v Speaker 1>feel like a very very very important fact, undeniable fact.
<v Speaker 1>Look at all the radars in range there. The excuse
<v Speaker 1>is India and Thailand just haven't said anything, and we're
<v Speaker 1>just gonna ignore that they haven't said anything. And Indonesia
<v Speaker 1>just says they were just off that night. Sorry, they
<v Speaker 1>were just off. I'm not kidding. That's their literal excuse.
<v Speaker 1>What Okay. So there's multiple radars as well that would
<v Speaker 1>have seen the plane, like Jorn this gingerly operational radar
<v Speaker 1>network in Australia, Diego, Garcia, Coco Islands, Pine Gap. I mean,
<v Speaker 1>these have radar systems. They are going to see rit
<v Speaker 1>planes for like thousands of miles. They're called over the horizon.
<v Speaker 1>There's also no witnesses that saw the plane, even though
<v Speaker 1>they claimed the plane crashed in the morning hours on
<v Speaker 1>an active shipping route in the South Indian Ocean. So
<v Speaker 1>there's no witnesses either. And now there's one more fact
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out as well. A lot of
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, the ocean is really big. Realize, like
<v Speaker 1>they've at people, it's not a situation where they don't
<v Speaker 1>think they know where it is. They think they know
<v Speaker 1>exactly where the plane is. It is just not there.
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a situation where the plane could be anywhere.
<v Speaker 1>It's not. They're like, oh, we have these satellite pings.
<v Speaker 1>If you believe these satellite pings are real, then we
<v Speaker 1>know almost exactly where the plane is. We just have
<v Speaker 1>to search this arc. And they've been searching that arc
<v Speaker 1>for eleven years and found nothing. So there's nowhere else
<v Speaker 1>for the plane to go. The arc is where the
<v Speaker 1>plane runs out of fuel. That's it. Game over. Nowhere
<v Speaker 1>else for it to be. Let that sink thing. I
<v Speaker 1>want to say it one more time. It's super important.
<v Speaker 1>There's nowhere else for the plane to be. For when
<v Speaker 1>people say the ocean is really big, you say they've
<v Speaker 1>searched everywhere the plane could possibly be. There is nowhere
<v Speaker 1>else for it to be. The only conclusion that can
<v Speaker 1>be made is that the plane never went in the
<v Speaker 1>South Indian Ocean, and the evidence that led us to
<v Speaker 1>that conclusion must be phony only conclusion that can be made.
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make a conclusion like that, but
<v Speaker 1>we must make it because the evidence of it is overwhelming.
<v Speaker 1>I also want to point out that nineteen families of
<v Speaker 1>the victims signed a statement saying that they could call
<v Speaker 1>the victim's phones for up to four days after the
<v Speaker 1>plane disappeared, which is not contrary to the one guy
<v Speaker 1>that they got to go on every major station and
<v Speaker 1>make up the lie that that happens. They literally just
<v Speaker 1>got the same exact guy to go on every single
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media news. If you don't believe me, go check.
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe it when I saw Jeff kit Kagan
<v Speaker 1>is his name. Every single one had the same guy
<v Speaker 1>come on and say, yeah, phones still ring all the
<v Speaker 1>time when there's no power, when they're on the bottom
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean or whatever. I couldn't believe they had
<v Speaker 1>the same guy. And they have the link that I
<v Speaker 1>posted in this clip is the actual video of the
<v Speaker 1>guy calling. For like a second or two, you can
<v Speaker 1>actually see a video of the guy calling crazy man. Okay,
<v Speaker 1>So the plane didn't crash inside to the ocean. We
<v Speaker 1>just we have to conclude that, regardless of what we
<v Speaker 1>want to believe about MH three seven zero, we have
<v Speaker 1>to conclude the plane didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean.
<v Speaker 1>There's just no evidence that it did none at all.
<v Speaker 1>And then people will say, well, but what about the debris,
<v Speaker 1>didn't they didn't somebody find some debris, not the official search.
<v Speaker 1>Random people in twenty fifteen, about a year after the
<v Speaker 1>plane disappeared, started finding debris and saying, wait, is this
<v Speaker 1>from MHS three seven zero and where were they? Were
<v Speaker 1>they in Australia where all the drift models showed that
<v Speaker 1>the debris should wash ashore in western Australia. No, they
<v Speaker 1>were in Africa, Africa. So people start searching around Africa.
<v Speaker 1>Sure enough, more people start finding debris from MHS three
<v Speaker 1>seven zero in Africa, but not not like close to Australia,
<v Speaker 1>like in like Tanzania, South Africa, way way too far
<v Speaker 1>away from where they were searching. But it makes sense
<v Speaker 1>because what did I just say in the previous statement.
<v Speaker 1>The plane didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean. So
<v Speaker 1>now that we're seeing debris wash ashore in Africa, we
<v Speaker 1>should be asking the question, wait, where did the plane
<v Speaker 1>actually go? Huh? So when you look at the debris
<v Speaker 1>that they claim to have found as well, the amount
<v Speaker 1>of debris that was found does not even approve the
<v Speaker 1>plane crashed. This main cabin interior panel that everybody's probably
<v Speaker 1>looking at right here is not what CNN is making
<v Speaker 1>it look to be no piece that was that big.
<v Speaker 1>The largest piece was the flap, which you can see
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of your screen. That was the largest
<v Speaker 1>piece found, the flap, And look at how tiny it
<v Speaker 1>is compared to the size of the wing. You can
<v Speaker 1>fly a plane without a flap and land the plane
<v Speaker 1>without a flap. There was not even enough evidence, enough
<v Speaker 1>debris found to even remotely claim that the proofs of
<v Speaker 1>plane crashed. You can just see it with your eyes.
<v Speaker 1>Only three confirmed pieces, and the confirmed pieces did not
<v Speaker 1>use unique serial numbers. This is important to point out
<v Speaker 1>for the conspiracy theorists. This is a factual statement. The
<v Speaker 1>confirmed pieces did not use unique serial numbers. The unique
<v Speaker 1>cereal plate was missing from the flat. I'm seriously missing.
<v Speaker 1>They used part numbers, which I would argue most people
<v Speaker 1>argue easily could be forged, change messed around with. However,
<v Speaker 1>I do believe this debris is from MH three to
<v Speaker 1>seven zero. I do believe that. I just believe that
<v Speaker 1>the South Indian Ocean narrative cannot possibly be correct. There's
<v Speaker 1>just no evidence for it. So MH three seven zero
<v Speaker 1>ended up. Whatever ended up means somewhere closer to Africa,
<v Speaker 1>not in the South Indian Ocean somewhere closer to Africa. Now,
<v Speaker 1>there's some really amazing charts here that show the ocean
<v Speaker 1>currents which cannot be changed, not yet at least, And
<v Speaker 1>you can see that there's no way that the debris
<v Speaker 1>can be from the location where they've been searching. The
<v Speaker 1>ocean currents flow to the east. And you can also
<v Speaker 1>see how absurd it is to think that our last
<v Speaker 1>location of the plane is somewhere in the Malacca Straits,
<v Speaker 1>but that for some reason we're searching about as far
<v Speaker 1>away as possible from that location in the middle of nowhere.
<v Speaker 1>Like you couldn't come up with a better story for like,
<v Speaker 1>just go search in the middle of nowhere, just down
<v Speaker 1>the block over there, just keep searching. You just search
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of nowhere instead of the smart places,
<v Speaker 1>which would be like hmm, does the perpetrator have any
<v Speaker 1>hideouts nearby? Right? Like does the perpetrator who could have
<v Speaker 1>pulled this off have any hideouts or what we would
<v Speaker 1>call military base? That was just vernacular. Oh, I'll look
<v Speaker 1>at this dot here I put called Diego Garcia. Look
<v Speaker 1>at the location of the debris relative to the ocean currents,
<v Speaker 1>relative to the island of Diego or of the Maldives
<v Speaker 1>in the US military base of Diego, Garcia. Look at
<v Speaker 1>that location that looks like are I'm not an oceanographer
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the shit you have to be, but it
<v Speaker 1>looks like a pretty solid match to where I would
<v Speaker 1>imagine DeBrito drift from Diego, Garcia to Africa in the year.
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another this at This model is my favorite
<v Speaker 1>model that I've ever seen in actual life ever, because
<v Speaker 1>there's a model out there you can find if you
<v Speaker 1>guys just google, like there's the most common one you
<v Speaker 1>find that's got like blue, green, pink and red and
<v Speaker 1>it looks like spaghetti strings. This was done before they
<v Speaker 1>found they need debris, and these are the best ones
<v Speaker 1>because the only models you can believe are ones that
<v Speaker 1>have no bias in them. And with this model, they
<v Speaker 1>found right away that all the debris would have washed
<v Speaker 1>ashore in Western Australia, like all of it, like even
<v Speaker 1>in two years. It wouldn't have made it to the
<v Speaker 1>Reunion Islands, not even in two years. And they found
<v Speaker 1>the debris just a little bit after one year. So
<v Speaker 1>a little bit after one year, this debris is like
<v Speaker 1>still near Australia so they found and then they tried
<v Speaker 1>to like wreckcon this after the fact, which is just
<v Speaker 1>hilarious is what they do, right when they try to
<v Speaker 1>lie they said, no, it's it like that. People will
<v Speaker 1>just literally with no substantiation whatsoever, just claim no, it's
<v Speaker 1>consistent with my models. No it's not. I can see
<v Speaker 1>the model right there. It says, right there, no chance
<v Speaker 1>within the time period we found could that debris have
<v Speaker 1>washed ashore in the Reunion Islands and that's the closest
<v Speaker 1>location any debris was found. Not possible. You can see
<v Speaker 1>it right there. All the debris, the vast, vast majority
<v Speaker 1>of it, ninety five ninety nine percent of it should
<v Speaker 1>have been washing ashore in Western Australia. Crazy right, Okay.
<v Speaker 1>It's also physically impossible for the debris to have drifted,
<v Speaker 1>just based on the maps I was showing you before,
<v Speaker 1>from the location to like South Africa. Just physically not possible,
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you think, no matter which direction you think,
<v Speaker 1>the ocean currents go, couldn't make it too far away.
<v Speaker 1>The barnacles on the flap only showed four months of growth,
<v Speaker 1>but it had to been in the water for over
<v Speaker 1>a year. And then there was growth on the area
<v Speaker 1>they claimed was exposed to the air. This is how
<v Speaker 1>they were arguing that the flat was able to somehow
<v Speaker 1>defy the laws of physics. They claimed that, oh no,
<v Speaker 1>it was just it was exposed, so it was like
<v Speaker 1>blowing like a sail. But there was barnacles along the
<v Speaker 1>edge that was supposedly out of the water, So that
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. That means it had to be underwater. That
<v Speaker 1>means you can't use that excuse. Their answer to that,
<v Speaker 1>no answer, They don't say anything. This is another huge
<v Speaker 1>piece of point on there's actually two pieces that have
<v Speaker 1>clear one undeniable burn marks on them with the honeycomb
<v Speaker 1>pattern of a Boeing aircraft. Meaning there's not really any
<v Speaker 1>other people that have pieces that look like this, and
<v Speaker 1>it was found in the same time period on you know,
<v Speaker 1>in the ocean, and you can just see the burn
<v Speaker 1>marks on it. You can even see the heat damage
<v Speaker 1>on that in the circle part in the top right.
<v Speaker 1>You explain that that burn damage without some type of
<v Speaker 1>fire right, hard to imagine, especially if you're trying to
<v Speaker 1>claim that it was like us. They flew the plane
<v Speaker 1>for eight hours and then just smoothly landed into the water.
<v Speaker 1>Well why am I seeing burn damage on this piece
<v Speaker 1>of the debris that you're telling me is from the plane.
<v Speaker 1>And there's another piece as well that I don't have
<v Speaker 1>a link to on here, but you can find all
<v Speaker 1>the debris. There's more. This one was just a little
<v Speaker 1>bit more clear that you know, anybody can just tell
<v Speaker 1>what fire damage looks like. There was also a Boeing
<v Speaker 1>Triple seven fire suppression bottle that washed up in the
<v Speaker 1>Mall Deeps just two weeks March twenty fifth after the
<v Speaker 1>plane disappeared. Some people have tried to claim this is
<v Speaker 1>from some other thing. It's a perfect match to a
<v Speaker 1>Boweing Triple seven fire supresson device, no doubt whatsoever. It
<v Speaker 1>can only have washed ashore if it's empty, and it
<v Speaker 1>even has a serial number that you can even see
<v Speaker 1>on there, or at least a partial serial number. This
<v Speaker 1>was just ignored and said that it's not connected without
<v Speaker 1>ever even being looked into. Nobody ever even looked into it,
<v Speaker 1>which to me would imply a cover up, because why
<v Speaker 1>would you not look into a piece of evidence because
<v Speaker 1>you've already decided that you don't want to look into it,
<v Speaker 1>and you can't look into it now. I also point
<v Speaker 1>out that I Foyer requested this fire suppression bottle to
<v Speaker 1>the NSA and the CIA, and by one of them
<v Speaker 1>I got rejected, or buy both of them, but I
<v Speaker 1>got one of them. I got rejected in a way
<v Speaker 1>that they have it. They just they refused to give
<v Speaker 1>me the evidence. So why would they have evidence about
<v Speaker 1>a buoyant triple seven fire depression bttle because they know
<v Speaker 1>it's connected to MH three seven zero, simple as that.
<v Speaker 1>So what does that lead us to? Fire scenario? Fire scenario?
<v Speaker 1>This was the underlooked scenario of MH three seven zero
<v Speaker 1>that ended up being true. And it's a little embarrassing
<v Speaker 1>that more people didn't go with the scenario because there
<v Speaker 1>were multiple articles I found out there by multiple different people,
<v Speaker 1>by multiple experts, claiming that it was almost certainly a fire,
<v Speaker 1>some of them before it was even revealed that there
<v Speaker 1>were lithium ion batteries in the cargo with the plane,
<v Speaker 1>not just a few, but a lot, five hundred pounds
<v Speaker 1>of them, four hundred and eighty seven to be exact.
<v Speaker 1>Now in the MH three seven zero, but in the
<v Speaker 1>drone video we can see a heat signature in the
<v Speaker 1>belly of the plane. One of the first things people
<v Speaker 1>pointed out was fire. And the weird part was I
<v Speaker 1>didn't even consider the fire event back then. I didn't
<v Speaker 1>even know there were people considering it. So when people
<v Speaker 1>said fire, I, initially as the lead investigator, I actually
<v Speaker 1>dismissed it. It wasn't until a couple months later, in
<v Speaker 1>October of twenty twenty three as well, that I found
<v Speaker 1>Catherine T's sighting that were supporting the fire event, and
<v Speaker 1>I went, wait a minute, and started looking into it
<v Speaker 1>and realized it probably really was a fire. So we
<v Speaker 1>had four hundred and eighty seven pounds of lifting my
<v Speaker 1>own batteries assembled that day in a really sketchy way.
<v Speaker 1>I might add, if you just go look at the
<v Speaker 1>official report by the ATSB, and they missed two security screenings.
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a recipe for disaster. Two of the
<v Speaker 1>palettes of batteries that were safely unsafely packaged, clearly just
<v Speaker 1>looking at the pictures, packaging and cardboard were in the
<v Speaker 1>forward cargo bay next to the electronics bay. And this
<v Speaker 1>is basically exactly what happened to UPS Flight six. This
<v Speaker 1>is what former Director uh Security Director of the FAA,
<v Speaker 1>Billy Vincent told me in a personal conversation with I
<v Speaker 1>had with him that he already found the articles where
<v Speaker 1>he was already implying this before they knew about the batteries,
<v Speaker 1>and he said, this is pretty much what happened in
<v Speaker 1>the UPS flight six. When I spoke to him about
<v Speaker 1>where the batteries were, what have you, he said, I'm
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent sure it was a fire. He was
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent convinced that was fire. Mike McKay saw
<v Speaker 1>a witness saw m a street cents You're on fire
<v Speaker 1>for a few seconds when it got dark. This was
<v Speaker 1>early in the morning, right at the exact same time
<v Speaker 1>the plane went dark, which would indicate that the fire
<v Speaker 1>would cause an electrical fire that damaged the electronics bay.
<v Speaker 1>There were then fishermen ten minutes later off the coast
<v Speaker 1>that her that saw the plane flying low going back
<v Speaker 1>the other way towards Malaysia. And then after the plane
<v Speaker 1>goes over to Malaysia, goes over Penang and doesn't land
<v Speaker 1>a Penang for whatever reason. It goes out into the ocean,
<v Speaker 1>and then Catherine t in the middle of nowhere out
<v Speaker 1>in the ocean sees the glowing orange plane flying low
<v Speaker 1>no navigation lights with smoke, dark smoke coming around the
<v Speaker 1>back of it at around eighteen forty UTC in the
<v Speaker 1>Nicobar Islands, and she has multiple blog posts over the years.
<v Speaker 1>She's always stuck by her sighting, her and what she
<v Speaker 1>claims she saw. And I spoke to her personally as well,
<v Speaker 1>and absolutely believe that she doesn't a single dishonest thought
<v Speaker 1>or bone in her. She sounds like a person who's
<v Speaker 1>just telling it like she saw it. She saw something
<v Speaker 1>absolutely incredible that night, so she sees the plane in
<v Speaker 1>that area, and her sighting corroborates the videos because we
<v Speaker 1>see the smoke coming off the plane in the videos,
<v Speaker 1>and we see the plane flying low in the videos
<v Speaker 1>because of the clouds, we can tell it's flying low.
<v Speaker 1>So it's perfectly consistent with her siting, but not just
<v Speaker 1>her sighting. Also a only reported in the China Times
<v Speaker 1>a May Day intercepted from MH three seven zero to
<v Speaker 1>the US Navy by China of the plane disintegrating and
<v Speaker 1>attempting an emergency landing. And they even give a time
<v Speaker 1>the time two forty three am. That's eighteen forty three UTC.
<v Speaker 1>That's within three minutes of Catherine T's sighting. That's within
<v Speaker 1>three minutes of when we plotted the plane would be
<v Speaker 1>near those coordinates, just finding having the plan going straight.
<v Speaker 1>So we have three sources of corroboration. Two videos military
<v Speaker 1>videos perfect sync with location of them that we can
<v Speaker 1>figure out the time Catherine T's sighting of seeing the
<v Speaker 1>smoke coming out the plane and the glowing the orange
<v Speaker 1>with the fire. And then we also have an intercepted
<v Speaker 1>communication that implies the US Navy is responsible. If they
<v Speaker 1>were communicating with the plane, they're the ones responsible. If
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones filming the videos, they're the ones responsible.
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it clearly implicates the United States Navy. And
<v Speaker 1>here it is. I'm just gonna read it out. In addition,
<v Speaker 1>the US Embassy in China said that at two forty
<v Speaker 1>three am, the US military based U Taypo, Thailand, monitored
<v Speaker 1>emergency SOS signal from Malaysian Airlines flight three seven zero,
<v Speaker 1>in which the pilot of the plane called that the
<v Speaker 1>cabin was about to disintegrate and that they wanted to
<v Speaker 1>make an emergency landing. The US Army in Thailand has
<v Speaker 1>provided this signal to the Malaysian side. What the actual hell?
<v Speaker 1>What what the actual hell? It was only a few
<v Speaker 1>investigators talking about this early on, and no one talks
<v Speaker 1>about it since you watch anybody's YouTube video about this
<v Speaker 1>other than mine, and you're not going to hear them
<v Speaker 1>mention this. I mean, why are we just ignoring the
<v Speaker 1>fact that there was an intercepted May Day call of
<v Speaker 1>the plane on fire? What are you kidding me? Do
<v Speaker 1>I need more evidence that the plane was on fire? Okay,
<v Speaker 1>you need more? Here's more. What were they saying the
<v Speaker 1>day the plane disappeared March eighth? When the plane disappears,
<v Speaker 1>what was the first thing they said? Usually the first
<v Speaker 1>thing they say is not going to be covered up yet,
<v Speaker 1>right because they're reacting emotional and they're just trying to
<v Speaker 1>get information out. Then then they have to start stop
<v Speaker 1>giving information out and start coming up with a cover story.
<v Speaker 1>So what did they say? Right away? They say, Soubang
<v Speaker 1>Air Traffic Control lost contact at two forty a m.
<v Speaker 1>What you're claiming you lost contact the same time Catherine
<v Speaker 1>T saw the plane within three minutes of the call.
<v Speaker 1>Is the time you're saying you lost contact with the plane.
<v Speaker 1>And then they had to change that later on they
<v Speaker 1>had to back away from it and say, no, just kidding,
<v Speaker 1>we actually We lost contact way earlier than that. We
<v Speaker 1>lost contact at one thirty, not not two forty. We
<v Speaker 1>just we just forgot what time it was. You need
<v Speaker 1>more evidence. Why did they change the time? Why did
<v Speaker 1>they change the time of the last communication of the plane?
<v Speaker 1>We know why. So the videos explain why we didn't
<v Speaker 1>find a burnt up plane. You say, Okay, if it
<v Speaker 1>was a fire, clearly it's a fire. I mean, that's
<v Speaker 1>look at how much evidence there is obviously a fire.
<v Speaker 1>Why do we not find a burnt up plane? This
<v Speaker 1>is an important point to make for a lot of
<v Speaker 1>the theories out there. Where's the plane? Well, when you
<v Speaker 1>watch the videos, you can tell we didn't find a
<v Speaker 1>burnt up plane somewhere, least somewhere where. Keep in mind,
<v Speaker 1>the plane's not gonna be able to stand on fire
<v Speaker 1>for eight hours now. Billy Vincent actually tried to argue
<v Speaker 1>with me that it could stand on fire for many hours.
<v Speaker 1>But we've got a may day call. This sounds like
<v Speaker 1>this was a desperate situation. The videos indicate that this
<v Speaker 1>plane was about to go down, so you know this
<v Speaker 1>was on its last legs because of this fire. It
<v Speaker 1>was not going to last that long. So we searched everywhere.
<v Speaker 1>The plane would have gone down if it was a fire.
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem. But the videos come into play, and
<v Speaker 1>now we're watching something abnormal. Now we're watching something really
<v Speaker 1>really abnormal, And now we have to throw out all
<v Speaker 1>of our orthodox thinking. We have to be heterodox thinkers now.
<v Speaker 1>And we have to remember that energy is neither created
<v Speaker 1>nor destroyed. And a Boeing Triple seven is an extremely
<v Speaker 1>massive object, two hundred and thirty nine people on board.
<v Speaker 1>So if this was being turned into a bomb of
<v Speaker 1>some sort, we should be seeing a massive mushroom cloud here.
<v Speaker 1>It can't just be getting annihilated unless there's just completely
<v Speaker 1>changing the laws of physics. And some people would say, well,
<v Speaker 1>are you saying it was teleported? Yes, And then they
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, doesn't that break the laws of physics? No, Actually, surprisingly,
<v Speaker 1>teleportation does not break the laws of physics. It's just
<v Speaker 1>not accepted at the moment. Wormholes are what we would
<v Speaker 1>call teleportation, and a wormhole at the quantum level er
<v Speaker 1>equals EPR is known as quantum entanglement. And there is
<v Speaker 1>this notion that quantum entanglement at the quantum level is
<v Speaker 1>basically little wormholes, and that then the answer would be,
<v Speaker 1>all we have to do is make a wormhole at
<v Speaker 1>the large scale, and then if we do that, we
<v Speaker 1>now achieved what we would call teleportation, which is to
<v Speaker 1>really actually simplify it faster than light travel from the
<v Speaker 1>person who's looking at that thing. When you demystify it,
<v Speaker 1>it's not as magical sounding and a lot more plausible.
<v Speaker 1>And if you think that that's outlandish, well, you know what,
<v Speaker 1>it is a little bit outlandish. Not going to lie
<v Speaker 1>to you. But at the same time, you look at
<v Speaker 1>how little we've progressed from a propulsion and engineering perspective
<v Speaker 1>in the last fifty to seventy years, and ask yourself
<v Speaker 1>why and if that's really the case, and if it
<v Speaker 1>imagine that if we were actually advancing, where would we
<v Speaker 1>be and what would we have. I think that everything
<v Speaker 1>lines up kind of nicely towards Yeah, we've just been
<v Speaker 1>hiding our progress in those areas. So this was a
<v Speaker 1>US Navy operation, probably the CIA involved as well. I'm
<v Speaker 1>not too picky. Blame whichever military organizations you want, but
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just like a rogue band of people or
<v Speaker 1>what have you. I've considered those scenarios of rogue you know,
<v Speaker 1>Wakanda scenarios, what have you. Nah, This is just listen.
<v Speaker 1>This is the US Military, the US Military Drome, General
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jerrome, US Navy. It's over the water. The guy
<v Speaker 1>who leaked the videos is Navy. I mean everyone's pointing
<v Speaker 1>to the Navy. So here's a picture that we made
<v Speaker 1>that shows where the plane would be getting teleported. Now,
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out this technology we see here.
<v Speaker 1>This is just me giving you my kind of off
<v Speaker 1>the wall opinion on this. I don't think this technology
<v Speaker 1>is I think they figured this technology out and they've
<v Speaker 1>been advancing it, but I think it has a long
<v Speaker 1>way to go. And we're not talking about teleporting people
<v Speaker 1>to Xenu or to the to the Sun or something
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yet. We're talking about like local short distance teleportation.
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think they did here. I think
<v Speaker 1>they did some sort of a short hop from the
<v Speaker 1>location where the plane was in the Nicobar Islands west
<v Speaker 1>somewhere over here near the Maldives, and then they that
<v Speaker 1>somehow I think, put out the fire, which seems weird,
<v Speaker 1>but when you actually look at the physics, you realize
<v Speaker 1>that like this teleportation would be an endothermic event where
<v Speaker 1>it absorbs energy. And the weird thing about the lithium
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries is that the only reason why they're unstoppable
<v Speaker 1>is because they have so much energy packed into them.
<v Speaker 1>So if somehow that zapp sucks the energy out of
<v Speaker 1>the batteries, the plane is just fine. I mean, if
<v Speaker 1>it was fine before it, it's not going to keep
<v Speaker 1>burning up anymore. So it's like, one of the first
<v Speaker 1>thoughts I had about this was like, that would be
<v Speaker 1>like a really weird way to save the plane. Like,
<v Speaker 1>imagine the weirdest way ever to save the plane is
<v Speaker 1>like put some orbs on it to like put the
<v Speaker 1>fire that puts the batteries fire out. Like that would
<v Speaker 1>almost seem like you set the fire just to put
<v Speaker 1>it out yourself, you know, like it's way too convenient,
<v Speaker 1>Like why would you you know, how could you have
<v Speaker 1>that planned? Don't worry, We're gonna get to that. So
<v Speaker 1>the motive then, Okay, why would the US do something
<v Speaker 1>like this, which they did. They did do this shit.
<v Speaker 1>They did this shit. Nobody believes it, but they did
<v Speaker 1>this shit. The answer is the free scale semi conductor engineers.
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you assume that they did do it,
<v Speaker 1>then the free scale semi conductor engineers are undeniably the
<v Speaker 1>reason why you got twenty people on the plane, all
<v Speaker 1>from the same company. They're all sitting next to each other.
<v Speaker 1>Some of them even have their family with them, but
<v Speaker 1>they're going to like a one week trip overseas. Seems
<v Speaker 1>really bizarre. It breaks policies, all company policies of like
<v Speaker 1>that have like intellectual property like this would this would
<v Speaker 1>break the policy that would say you shouldn't allow these
<v Speaker 1>people to all be on the same flight. And it's shot.
<v Speaker 1>Nine or eight of them are Chinese nationals and the
<v Speaker 1>company works has contracts with US Aerospace and defense. They
<v Speaker 1>also and this was incredible, Like I literally could never
<v Speaker 1>have imagined there would be this much incriminating evidence that
<v Speaker 1>points to the semiconductor people being the guy. There's a
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five NSA security report about this company
<v Speaker 1>and a couple other companies, but mainly this company about
<v Speaker 1>how they were advancing towards room temperature superconductive microchips, which
<v Speaker 1>guys as nowadays, it's funny how much like the times
<v Speaker 1>have changed so much in the last twenty years or
<v Speaker 1>even the last ten years, where now people like when
<v Speaker 1>I talk about room temperature, super microchips. People are immediately
<v Speaker 1>thinking like, oh, quantum computers, AI stuff like that. Yes, yes,
<v Speaker 1>so yes, we know that's the shit, right, that's the
<v Speaker 1>that's the jam. So we have these people on board
<v Speaker 1>the plane, okay, and they had just launched a major
<v Speaker 1>initiative serving the RF power needs for US aerospace and defense.
<v Speaker 1>So what are the possible narratives so I will not
<v Speaker 1>get offend it if people are pushing narratives that actually
<v Speaker 1>fit the evidence, actually don't get in offended at all,
<v Speaker 1>but that primarily I prefer ones that would prefer this.
<v Speaker 1>So one is counter espionage. You're preventing defectors from going
<v Speaker 1>to China with intellectual property. This could be a spy
<v Speaker 1>or spy kind of situation. In fact, I think that's
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Could be a show force USA versus
<v Speaker 1>China versus Russia, some kind of shadow arms race to
<v Speaker 1>develop ORB technology. Maybe it's the UFO technology, alien technology,
<v Speaker 1>Atlantean technology. Who knows who cares, but maybe that's going
<v Speaker 1>on in that case. This is like a who's your
<v Speaker 1>daddy moment? Like we're so far beyond where you're at,
<v Speaker 1>Like you got to look over your shoulder every time,
<v Speaker 1>every time you do anything. This is like a moment
<v Speaker 1>where you do something like this to tell them like
<v Speaker 1>we know everything you know, and we know that we
<v Speaker 1>own you. We own you, bitch. That's basically why you
<v Speaker 1>would do something like this. It could, though, also be
<v Speaker 1>a rescue operation. That plane was doomed. Landing in the
<v Speaker 1>ocean is going to break that plane apart. I don't
<v Speaker 1>care what some of these people try to claim about
<v Speaker 1>how it was just perfectly land the plane in the ocean.
<v Speaker 1>Boeing Triple seven, no bowing triple seven is gonna rip up.
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys just see that plane Alaska or Canada
<v Speaker 1>like hit the hit the ice and then flipped over
<v Speaker 1>and the wings broke off, like the moment one of
<v Speaker 1>your wings hits anything. It's the wings are gonna crack
<v Speaker 1>off and that plane's gonna do a barrel roll and
<v Speaker 1>crack in half. Anyone's saying a otherwise, it just has
<v Speaker 1>not seen planes in aerodynamics. So this plane was doomed.
<v Speaker 1>So maybe there was a VIP passenger that called in
<v Speaker 1>their rescue me button they get out of for jail
<v Speaker 1>free card. They just said save me. I don't know.
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty weird that they and also the
<v Speaker 1>fact that it could have put out the fire. It's
<v Speaker 1>just it seems very organized, like too organized, like way
<v Speaker 1>too organized. Actually it could also been an experiment. You know.
<v Speaker 1>If this technology is relatively new and they generally know
<v Speaker 1>what it does, you know, maybe they thought, Okay, well,
<v Speaker 1>here's the perfect opportunity to use it. We're gonna kill
<v Speaker 1>these people anyway, or whatever we plan to do to them,
<v Speaker 1>you know, might as well zap them with some orbs
<v Speaker 1>and see if they come out the other side, or
<v Speaker 1>like hills have eyes type people, or if they you know,
<v Speaker 1>are okay, or maybe they come back with mustaches from
<v Speaker 1>the bizarro dimension. Who knows. Maybe it's alien technology and
<v Speaker 1>we have to text it out before we use it
<v Speaker 1>on the aliens, or something that we're gonna fight. I
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Once again, I don't care what the answer is.
<v Speaker 1>I just want us to admit that we, the United
<v Speaker 1>States Navy, did this to the plane, because clearly they did.
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to point out everybody was blaming the
<v Speaker 1>United States for some reason, United the world ignores this
<v Speaker 1>like everyone just acts like nobody knows who did it.
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's blaming the United States except for the United States, everyone, Russia.
<v Speaker 1>The gru report claims the United States Navy diverted the plane.
<v Speaker 1>China Times is saying that the US Navy had communications
<v Speaker 1>with m H three seven zero, clearly implicating the US Navy.
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister of Malaysia Maati, the most respected prime
<v Speaker 1>minister ever Malaysian's history. Who's prime minister right before this
<v Speaker 1>happened and after this happened, and he had a guy
<v Speaker 1>in between his time that came in and said the
<v Speaker 1>plane win in the South Indi the ocean, and then
<v Speaker 1>that guy went to prison for being a criminal. And
<v Speaker 1>then the other prime minister came back again and he
<v Speaker 1>said that the CIA did it. So Malaysians prime minister
<v Speaker 1>said the CIA did it because they did do it,
<v Speaker 1>because they did do it, because they clearly did it.
<v Speaker 1>Because he's like, of course they've saw the plane. You're
<v Speaker 1>an idiot if you think the United States government doesn't
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what happened to MH three seven zero. They
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what happened. I'm not talking about vaguely. They
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what happened and why it happened and everything.
<v Speaker 1>And anybody claiming the United States government doesn't know has
<v Speaker 1>not been paying attention, has not looked at the Foyer
<v Speaker 1>request or the stack of Foyer rejections that I have
<v Speaker 1>from every agency in the United States about MH three
<v Speaker 1>seven to zero. And if they were not involved, there'd
<v Speaker 1>be no reason for the level of secrecy involved in
<v Speaker 1>this plane. Okay. It was also reported that Malaysia was
<v Speaker 1>given information by the United States on condition that they
<v Speaker 1>not reveal it, which is probably that we orbed the
<v Speaker 1>plane away and they can't talk about it. China leaked
<v Speaker 1>satellite imagery onto the Internet. They leaked satellite imagery on
<v Speaker 1>in there on March twelfth, four days after the plane
<v Speaker 1>goes away. They leak imagery on the Internet that looks
<v Speaker 1>really similar to what we're seeing in the satellite video.
<v Speaker 1>It just looks like it's further away, like it's not
<v Speaker 1>as good resolution, and it's a still image as opposed
<v Speaker 1>to a video, but it looks like three objects spinning
<v Speaker 1>around something else with low altitude cumulus clouds. Pretty unusual
<v Speaker 1>that China just leaked these internet images on the Internet
<v Speaker 1>and had people think like, oh, it's a debris field somewhere,
<v Speaker 1>and then they searched there was no debris field, So
<v Speaker 1>what was this what was this all about. It looks
<v Speaker 1>like this is a message to the United States intelligence
<v Speaker 1>agencies saying we'd know what you did, we know you're responsible,
<v Speaker 1>and we can corroborate that. Why Because China hacked the
<v Speaker 1>Malaysian government of Marsi nine three days prior, and they
<v Speaker 1>stole the crisis meeting minute notes and classified info about
<v Speaker 1>M three seven zero. So they stole most likely the
<v Speaker 1>classified communications between MH three seven zero and the United
<v Speaker 1>States Navy. United States Navy was in communication with the
<v Speaker 1>plane and they had they classified those communications, and China
<v Speaker 1>stole them. And so China knew one that the United
<v Speaker 1>States Navy was responsible. And this was them saying we
<v Speaker 1>know what you did. The French father on the Netflix
<v Speaker 1>documentary was told that there were two American A wax
<v Speaker 1>spy planes in the area and the mayor Americans know
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Everybody was saying the Americans did it. Everybody.
<v Speaker 1>Edward C. Lynn, US Navy Special operator, US Navy implied
<v Speaker 1>even the US Navy was saying they did it, or
<v Speaker 1>the US military was saying they did it. I couldn't
<v Speaker 1>believe this. Here's even a quote confirmed Sibbers provided data
<v Speaker 1>to the intelligence community to help solve the mystery of
<v Speaker 1>Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero. This is the art
<v Speaker 1>of what we do, says Colonel Mike Jackson, four hundred
<v Speaker 1>and sixtieth Operation Group Commander at Buckley, Officials at the
<v Speaker 1>four underd and fifty of space Wing, that's actually where
<v Speaker 1>the space wing is confirmed that SIBBERS provided technical data
<v Speaker 1>to the intelligence community to help solve the mystery of
<v Speaker 1>Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero, which disappeared over the
<v Speaker 1>Indian Ocean March fourteenth, twenty fourteenth. Who is there any
<v Speaker 1>about there? Still don't think that the United States knows
<v Speaker 1>what happened on the plane. Everybody says the United States
<v Speaker 1>did it, including the United States literally admitting that their
<v Speaker 1>Sibber system knows what happened to the plane. And we're
<v Speaker 1>looking at leaked, possibly SIBBERS video of the plane recorded
<v Speaker 1>by the United States intelligence agencies. I'm actually a little
<v Speaker 1>bit surprised that it's this hard to convince people at
<v Speaker 1>this point. Doesn't that like beyond any shadow of a
<v Speaker 1>possible doubt, like case closed, what else is there to
<v Speaker 1>even discover? So the cover up? Obviously the United States
<v Speaker 1>did it, No question so can we show how they proved?
<v Speaker 1>Can we prove the lie? Yeah, we improved the lie
<v Speaker 1>as well. Oh this isn't the thing, okay, So there's
<v Speaker 1>some interesting facts about the plane, about the cover up here.
<v Speaker 1>So the satellite coordinat it could only be the nick
<v Speaker 1>of our islands because the videos pre date the whole
<v Speaker 1>South Indian Ocean narrative. The videos say they were received
<v Speaker 1>March twelfth March twelve, twenty fourteen, but the South Indian
<v Speaker 1>Ocean narrative was not even developed March thirteenth till March thirteenth,
<v Speaker 1>And when and who pushed that? Unnamed US officials aka
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officials started leaking information to the media on March
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth that Mia Street seven and zero flew into the
<v Speaker 1>South Indian Ocean. Now, not only are we implicating the
<v Speaker 1>US military, but they're the ones who spread the fake
<v Speaker 1>story that the plane winning the South Indian Ocean. They're
<v Speaker 1>the ones who sent us the wrong location. Why are
<v Speaker 1>we believing the people that literally everybody said was responsible.
<v Speaker 1>It's like going to the killer and asking where the
<v Speaker 1>bodies are at. There's not going to send you to
<v Speaker 1>the real location. The real locations dieve Garcia by the way,
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get to it in a minute. That's
<v Speaker 1>where the plane went. So the White House was calling
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia every day. Again, there's no reason for the White
<v Speaker 1>House to be calling Malaysia every day. You leave that
<v Speaker 1>to your state department. There was one adult American on
<v Speaker 1>board the plane. Would why would the White House be
<v Speaker 1>calling every day? And you'd think, oh, because they care
<v Speaker 1>so much? Then why was that? President Obama's first press
<v Speaker 1>conference about MGHS three seven zero wasn't until ten days
<v Speaker 1>later on March seventeenth. I think it was March seventeenth,
<v Speaker 1>maybe March nineteenth. He waited ten days to talk about
<v Speaker 1>MH three seven zero. Why because he had to wait
<v Speaker 1>till the cover story was built. Why didn't Why didn't
<v Speaker 1>Obama talk about the missing plane the next day? He
<v Speaker 1>was like, I would have expected a press conference literally
<v Speaker 1>on March eighth about the plane disappearing. Instead he waited
<v Speaker 1>ten days to even discuss it. And then after that
<v Speaker 1>he went to Malaysia for the first time any president
<v Speaker 1>has gone to Malaysian over fifty years. Obama goes to
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia the next month in April, and he gets a
<v Speaker 1>couple sound bites about MH three seven zero, but barely
<v Speaker 1>discusses it and never discusses MH three seven zero publicly
<v Speaker 1>ever again, Go check it. I couldn't believe it, I
<v Speaker 1>asked AI. I looked to myself. President Obama never discussed
<v Speaker 1>MH three seven zero ever again after he visited Malaysia
<v Speaker 1>in August in April, at least not in any public way,
<v Speaker 1>in any serious way. I mean, if you couldn't ask
<v Speaker 1>for a perfect lineup to incriminate the United States, and
<v Speaker 1>they're exacting exactly how you would act if you were
<v Speaker 1>the person who was the person who perpetuated the crime,
<v Speaker 1>perpetrated to the crime, and then was covering it up,
<v Speaker 1>also pointing out that Rolls Royce was silent even though
<v Speaker 1>they have two engines that transmit data independently, and that
<v Speaker 1>these engine data should have been transmitting, but that data
<v Speaker 1>has never been revealed publicly. Why because the data would
<v Speaker 1>show what really happened to the plane and they couldn't
<v Speaker 1>allow that to happen. There were Cope Tiger and Cobra
<v Speaker 1>gold exercises that had just begun and ended that were
<v Speaker 1>happening in the exact area, and Cope Tiger's operations that
<v Speaker 1>year with search and rescue, which corroborates the search and
<v Speaker 1>rescue code names from Edward c Lynn's flight manifests that
<v Speaker 1>he was caught with. So actually the literal cope tiger
<v Speaker 1>themed that year with search and rescue. So there's no
<v Speaker 1>way all of the US Navy assets would have been
<v Speaker 1>in the area because there was military exercises going on
<v Speaker 1>right there in the area where we had the coordinates happening,
<v Speaker 1>So the assets were there. You've got the right time
<v Speaker 1>for it to happen. And this also proves as well,
<v Speaker 1>the US knows what happened. You're not going to have
<v Speaker 1>a rogue bowing Triple seven flying past US military exercises
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not see it makes no sense they as
<v Speaker 1>Matthias Chang said, it's like flying into the heart of
<v Speaker 1>the storm. You're going to like the exact wrong way
<v Speaker 1>to take a plane. The Minister of Defense admitted that
<v Speaker 1>he was in contact with the US about spy satellites
<v Speaker 1>in the region. If you don't believe me, well.
<v Speaker 3>Regions he received data from.
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they were in touch with the United States,
<v Speaker 1>and yes they had received data from Rolls Royce which
<v Speaker 1>has never been made publicly available. Once again, all I'm
<v Speaker 1>doing is showing the receipts from the publicly available press conferences.
<v Speaker 1>You can find them out there now. The Minister of
<v Speaker 1>Defense also said that they knew the plane was not hostile,
<v Speaker 1>which means they had communications with the plane that they
<v Speaker 1>have not revealed. This is so important because I've just
<v Speaker 1>told you that there was United States military communications with
<v Speaker 1>the plane, that they must have been classified, and that
<v Speaker 1>China probably stole those communications. Well, we have the military,
<v Speaker 1>the number one official in Malaysia related to the case.
<v Speaker 1>The Minister of Defense literally admits they knew the plane
<v Speaker 1>was not hostile. This is only possible if they had
<v Speaker 1>communications with the plane that they have not revealed. Otherwise,
<v Speaker 1>if you did not have communications with the plane, you
<v Speaker 1>could never rule out a pilot rogue pilot or a
<v Speaker 1>hijacking scenario. Those both require communications to confirm. So let's
<v Speaker 1>listen to him in his own words.
<v Speaker 2>Don send digits up. If you have conceded earlier that
<v Speaker 2>you knew very early in the morning the plane was missing,
<v Speaker 2>there was four and a half hours time in which to.
<v Speaker 4>Resort commercial it was from our airspace. We're not at
<v Speaker 4>war with anybody.
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't answer, go up.
<v Speaker 2>In hindsight, would you agree that we wouldn't be in
<v Speaker 2>the situation we are now, which is.
<v Speaker 4>I don't so, I don't think that speculatives. Even if
<v Speaker 4>we send it back, Are you going to say that
<v Speaker 4>we're going to shoot it down?
<v Speaker 1>No, Jesus said that, not me.
<v Speaker 4>I'm asking you.
<v Speaker 1>Why is he asking? So?
<v Speaker 4>If you're not going to it's not going to shoot
<v Speaker 4>it down, what's the point of sending it.
<v Speaker 2>Up to see where it's going?
<v Speaker 4>Well, to see that going you need a fight for that,
<v Speaker 4>apparently with you, But military procedures.
<v Speaker 1>The radars are all off.
<v Speaker 4>Apparently it should it down. You'll be the first to say,
<v Speaker 4>how can you shoot down a commercial airline with fourteen nationals?
<v Speaker 4>Half of them Chinese have been a worst position? Probably?
<v Speaker 2>Why shoot it down there? If it's not hostile?
<v Speaker 4>But the Americans would?
<v Speaker 1>Why that weird statement at the end about what the
<v Speaker 1>Americans would do? Creepiest thing I've ever heard. I've never
<v Speaker 1>seen a more guilty person ever in my life. It's
<v Speaker 1>not incompetence. It was maliciousness, absolute maliciousness. Why not send
<v Speaker 1>up the plane? He says, Right at the beginning, they
<v Speaker 1>knew it was a commercial airliner and not hostile. How
<v Speaker 1>do you know that the ACR system wasn't turned on,
<v Speaker 1>it was not on flight radar, but you knew it
<v Speaker 1>was a commercial plane and it wasn't hostile. Why that's incredible.
<v Speaker 1>He's either Misscleo the psychic or they had communications with
<v Speaker 1>the plane. It's a very simple fact that can't be denied.
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of the things that you won't see
<v Speaker 1>any of the other investigators bring up because they can't
<v Speaker 1>really deal with evidence that goes against their preconceived notions
<v Speaker 1>about what they think happened to the plane, even when
<v Speaker 1>it's undeniable. There's no other interpretation. There's no other interpretation
<v Speaker 1>from what he's saying. Their interpretation is basically everything they'd
<v Speaker 1>disagree with is a lie or fake or whatever they
<v Speaker 1>needed to be bizarre. Okay, now there's even more stuff
<v Speaker 1>that implicates the United States. I can't believe how much
<v Speaker 1>there is. Uh. There's a clip of Florence to Changing,
<v Speaker 1>who did a lot of on the boots on the
<v Speaker 1>ground research shout out to her. Nephew of the pilot
<v Speaker 1>was told that his uncle was collateral damage. Now, the
<v Speaker 1>only situation that people I've ever heard people use the
<v Speaker 1>word collateral damage is when the government is killing people.
<v Speaker 1>Is there any other situation when people are referred to
<v Speaker 1>as collateral damage. I'm pretty sure it's only when the
<v Speaker 1>government is killing people. So this would imply it was
<v Speaker 1>a government operation that happened to the plane. The former
<v Speaker 1>head of Indonesian Police was told quote unquote what really
<v Speaker 1>happened to MHD seven zero, which implies there's a real story,
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a story that's being told to the public.
<v Speaker 1>So once again, these are like people who are officials
<v Speaker 1>that were in the know, just telling the truth, and
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to believe them when they tell the truth.
<v Speaker 1>They only want to believe the fictional story that's being
<v Speaker 1>told in the media. And then just to add this
<v Speaker 1>on there, weirdly, there's two Iranian fake passengers who are
<v Speaker 1>using stolen passports, traveling together and change their appearance to
<v Speaker 1>look like the people in the passports, and they were
<v Speaker 1>just dismissed in one day after the plane disappeared. As well.
<v Speaker 1>They were just refugees, like going to they were trying
<v Speaker 1>to go to Amsterdam, but they were going to Beijing
<v Speaker 1>for reasons of you know whatever. What we're just gonna
<v Speaker 1>gloss over that a plane disappeared and there's like two
<v Speaker 1>people from a let's say, adversarial country to the United
<v Speaker 1>States that are fake passengers on stolen passports. Okay, I
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll just we'll ignore that. If they were operatives,
<v Speaker 1>they would be exactly what we'd be looking for. I'll
<v Speaker 1>just leave it at that. Now, where'd the plane go?
<v Speaker 1>It went to Diego Garcia. Why to go to Diego Garcia.
<v Speaker 1>It's the only place for the plane to go. It's
<v Speaker 1>the only place. Everybody was saying, including Mark du Gain
<v Speaker 1>who's a famous author and got a lot of heat
<v Speaker 1>for it, and some people claim that he was told
<v Speaker 1>to like stop looking into it. Catherine t the witness,
<v Speaker 1>she also and I think it was her twenty eighteen
<v Speaker 1>blog posts I have a link to above, says I
<v Speaker 1>think she said. She now agrees the plane went to
<v Speaker 1>Diego Garcia, and every other conspiracy theory out there was
<v Speaker 1>saying the plane was remote controlled there or whatever. I
<v Speaker 1>think it was Field McConnell's saying that. And why because
<v Speaker 1>Diego Garcia is like a NASA landing strip, perfect location.
<v Speaker 1>There's got to be underground stuff there. There was a
<v Speaker 1>Maldives sighting at a small island in the early early
<v Speaker 1>morning hours, where a bunch of islanders saw the plane
<v Speaker 1>and the red and white strip of Malayian Airlines flying
<v Speaker 1>south towards the Garcia. The pilot had Diego Garcia in
<v Speaker 1>a simulator for some weird reason, even though it's not
<v Speaker 1>open to commercial aircrafts. And then there was a no
<v Speaker 1>departures from Diego Garcia for seventy two hours after March eighth,
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty damned suspicious. Wait, so there's just gonna
<v Speaker 1>be no departures for three days after the plane lands there,
<v Speaker 1>which is probably what happened. I mean, that's pretty convenient,
<v Speaker 1>pretty incriminating. Oh and in case you wanted the logs, well,
<v Speaker 1>the flight logs were just all destroyed by water damage
<v Speaker 1>in July of twenty fourteen. If you don't believe me,
<v Speaker 1>go look it up. I absolutely can't. You could not
<v Speaker 1>make this story up. The Diego Garcia flight logs were
<v Speaker 1>destroyed by water damage in July of twenty fourteen, just
<v Speaker 1>a few months after m three seven zero. What a coincidence?
<v Speaker 1>What ah? Too bad? Would have been convenient to have
<v Speaker 1>those flight logs, but they were just too shame twenty fourteen.
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have computers in twenty fourteen. Guys, it was
<v Speaker 1>the Stone Ages in twenty fourteen. You know, everything was
<v Speaker 1>still on paper in twenty fourteen. I know that I
<v Speaker 1>worked on paper. It has underground facilities with black vault
<v Speaker 1>Foyer request showing that it may be a CIA black
<v Speaker 1>site AKA that has like prisoners on there. There was
<v Speaker 1>a message from Philip Wood posted on four Chan saying
<v Speaker 1>that he's held captive. But there's just a black picture.
<v Speaker 1>But the EXIF data in the picture has coordinates placing
<v Speaker 1>it in Diego, Garcia, where they think that they have
<v Speaker 1>these CIA black site prisons. Which is like, Man, if
<v Speaker 1>you were coming up with a story about where the
<v Speaker 1>plane went, you couldn't be more on the nose. Well,
<v Speaker 1>it went to a military black the US military operation
<v Speaker 1>went to a U secret US military base. It's more
<v Speaker 1>secret than Area fifty one that no one's allowed to
<v Speaker 1>go to that. If you wash ashore there, like some
<v Speaker 1>refugees did a few years ago, you're not allowed to leave. Ever,
<v Speaker 1>they were stranded there for three years, like they finally
<v Speaker 1>were legally forced to allow them to leave. And if
<v Speaker 1>you go work at Diego Garcia. You have to take
<v Speaker 1>like a two year deal and you're not allowed to
<v Speaker 1>communicate with anyone outside your life for two years, like
<v Speaker 1>you can't have communications outside the base. There were actually
<v Speaker 1>a weird situation where there were photos on Facebook that
<v Speaker 1>look vaguely similar to the crew. This was in like
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty or twenty twenty one. So for the people
<v Speaker 1>that want to know what happened to the people, I
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They're probably not alive. If they are, then
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're living on Diego Garcia. That's if you want
<v Speaker 1>to dream and be very optimistic. My view is that everybody,
<v Speaker 1>if not clo if almost everybody, if not everybody, succumbed
<v Speaker 1>to the smoke from the fire because people don't realize
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous. Maybe even the US government didn't realize how
<v Speaker 1>dangerous lithium ion battery smoke was back then. It's one
<v Speaker 1>inhalation and game over. Like that's how dangerous and toxic
<v Speaker 1>that smoke is. So I personally don't think that anybody
<v Speaker 1>could have survived even to the get to the point
<v Speaker 1>where the plane was being zapped, except for like the pilot,
<v Speaker 1>because the pilot has the special hood that's like the
<v Speaker 1>the one that can last for like several hours, compared
<v Speaker 1>to like, you're the shitty thing that comes from the
<v Speaker 1>sky that you're just you're done. If that's all you've got,
<v Speaker 1>the thing that comes from the top of the plane, Okay,
<v Speaker 1>we've only got a few more things to go through here. Also,
<v Speaker 1>just want to point out that there is this ground
<v Speaker 1>based electric optical deep space surveillance system that's got a
<v Speaker 1>site at Diego Garcia. So they've got some pretty advanced
<v Speaker 1>stuff in Diego Garcia that they're covering up there. Maybe
<v Speaker 1>not anymore now that it's been exposed, but they did.
<v Speaker 1>Now the Inmersat pings, the only the most theories are
<v Speaker 1>based on this idea that the plane flew in the
<v Speaker 1>South Indian Ocean, and it's all based on ten rows
<v Speaker 1>from Inmersat that were never corroborated by anybody. And when
<v Speaker 1>I say corroborated I mean by like a different I
<v Speaker 1>don't mean corroborated by like we both looked through the
<v Speaker 1>same shitty data and came to the same shitty conclusion.
<v Speaker 1>I mean like somebody else has data that corroborates your data.
<v Speaker 1>That's how data works. If you don't understand that concept,
<v Speaker 1>then like they, I guess you're not an expert. I
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm a database expert, because this is actually my
<v Speaker 1>real job that I've have twenty years of experience on
<v Speaker 1>is databases like this. Now, I could fake these ten
<v Speaker 1>rows on an Xcel spreadsheet in five minutes. If you
<v Speaker 1>gave me what I needed to know, I could fake
<v Speaker 1>it in about five minutes. It's actually just straight up
<v Speaker 1>trivial to fake these ten rows in XCEL spreadsheet, and
<v Speaker 1>these ten rows in this XL spreadsheet here represent I
<v Speaker 1>think six hours five five hours of flight time, five
<v Speaker 1>hours of flight time. This is all we've got. This
<v Speaker 1>is the only reason why everyone who thinks the plane
<v Speaker 1>one in the South Indian Ocean, this is the only
<v Speaker 1>evidence they have. This what you see highlighted in green
<v Speaker 1>right there, and you can see quite clearly if you
<v Speaker 1>were to look at the whole data set, there's a
<v Speaker 1>massive deviation when it gets to this area in green.
<v Speaker 1>When it gets this area and green, all of a sudden,
<v Speaker 1>the way that the satellite's pinion changes entirely. It goes
<v Speaker 1>from pinging like sporadically like every like fifteen to twenty
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to only pinging every hour on the hour
<v Speaker 1>like or not every hour on the hour, but every hour,
<v Speaker 1>like exactly one hour from the last hour plus a
<v Speaker 1>couple seconds. It's like, why is it so different? All
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden I asked the investigators who literally came
<v Speaker 1>up with the model and reviewed this. They couldn't answer
<v Speaker 1>the question. They couldn't answer that basic, basic question about
<v Speaker 1>data that anybody that hasn't done any database work ever,
<v Speaker 1>or with any relational databases, which are basically excels price,
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to answer super simple question. That's
<v Speaker 1>how easy it is to lie to people. Ten rows
<v Speaker 1>on an Excel spreadsheet that my seven year old nephew
<v Speaker 1>could fake. It took the US government like ten weeks
<v Speaker 1>to fake this. They didn't release this data until May
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh, twenty fourteen. The MAA Street seven zero videos
<v Speaker 1>had already been on the internet for over a week.
<v Speaker 1>They had already been published on the internet on YouTube.
<v Speaker 1>People were watching them for a week and this hadn't
<v Speaker 1>even been released yet. So we're thinking somebody couldn't fake
<v Speaker 1>ten rows on spreadsheet, but they faked two magic two
<v Speaker 1>videos and perfect synchronization of the US military telling the
<v Speaker 1>perfect story of what really happened tom A Street seven
<v Speaker 1>zero is incredible to me how people who call themselves
<v Speaker 1>skeptics don't apply to skepticism to the people who are
<v Speaker 1>presenting that they want to believe. Skeptics should look at
<v Speaker 1>this and go this doesn't make any sense. What happened here?
<v Speaker 1>Why is this data all of a sudden change here
<v Speaker 1>at the exact moment where right above this you see
<v Speaker 1>what time does this say right before the green right
<v Speaker 1>before this data changes, What time does it say? Eighteen
<v Speaker 1>forty UTC. Wow, that's the exact same time Sue Bang
<v Speaker 1>Air Traffic Control lost contact with the plane the same
<v Speaker 1>day the plane disappeared. That is one hell of a coincidence.
<v Speaker 1>Chat the exact same moment that Sue Bang air Traffic
<v Speaker 1>Control says they lost contact with the plane, the same
<v Speaker 1>moment we're seeing the plane in two videos filmed by
<v Speaker 1>the US military, All of a sudden that that same
<v Speaker 1>time the data changes in the satellite data For the
<v Speaker 1>people saying yatzi, yes, YATSI, why I formally called out
<v Speaker 1>Inersat for fraud Absolutely no question. This data is fraudulent, fake, spoofed.
<v Speaker 1>Whatever did to it to make it? I don't know
<v Speaker 1>what they did. That's not a mystrey seven zero. If
<v Speaker 1>it is, then the methodology that was used to determine
<v Speaker 1>the win in the south the ocean, and then that's
<v Speaker 1>flawed or fake whatever. Something about this is fake clearly,
<v Speaker 1>and it looks to me like somebody just fudged ten
<v Speaker 1>rows on an Xcel spreadsheet. That's my professional opinion as
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's worked on databases for twenty years. I can
<v Speaker 1>write SQL data and update statements, and I can write
<v Speaker 1>multi table queries that are relatively extensive. Okay, Now, the
<v Speaker 1>rogue pilot theory the number one theory at the moment,
<v Speaker 1>and this was not the number one theory at the
<v Speaker 1>time the plane disappeared. The rogue pilot theory was considered
<v Speaker 1>like three percent or less. Basically, nobody thought that it
<v Speaker 1>was possible because there was nothing indicating it. It's not
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't leave any notes. There was no manifesto,
<v Speaker 1>nothing to indicate that they did it or anything like that. Nothing.
<v Speaker 1>There was no evidence for it. He had eighteen thousand
<v Speaker 1>flight hours and everyone stood up for him, including officials,
<v Speaker 1>the wife, co workers. Everybody said he was an awesome guy.
<v Speaker 1>He would never do it. Florence d' Changy even got
<v Speaker 1>access to his medical records. His family was so adamant
<v Speaker 1>they gave his medical records to Florence to Changy to
<v Speaker 1>prove that his mental psych screening was all perfect. The
<v Speaker 1>flight path contra indicates a suicide route. A suicide route
<v Speaker 1>is not going to go back to the nearest airport.
<v Speaker 1>Suicide route's going to go in a random ass direction
<v Speaker 1>because you don't care. You're also not like a lot
<v Speaker 1>of people have argued that the plane was going between
<v Speaker 1>radar zones. That's not how that works at all. But
<v Speaker 1>if you were a suicide of pilot, you don't care
<v Speaker 1>about radar zones. If somebody comes up and shoots on
<v Speaker 1>your plane, you don't care because you're gonna take the
<v Speaker 1>plane down anyway in a suicidal pilot scenario. I also
<v Speaker 1>want to point out real quickly as well that the
<v Speaker 1>are argument that people make that like the pilot was
<v Speaker 1>avoiding radar doesn't actually make any sense at all. So
<v Speaker 1>when when people like mentor pilot, I think is the
<v Speaker 1>biggest one who promoted this misinformation, and he should apologize
<v Speaker 1>honestly for being so horribly wrong in his analysis. I mean,
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably in normal situations a decent guy.
<v Speaker 1>But his MA Streets of Misserve video is complete garbage.
<v Speaker 1>And he promoted this myth that like the pilot turned
<v Speaker 1>off the system to avoid radar. But here's the thing.
<v Speaker 1>You can't avoid radar that way. Radar is gonna see
<v Speaker 1>you anyway. And if your argument is, oh, well, they
<v Speaker 1>weren't in your zone, well you're telling me that they
<v Speaker 1>turned themselves off from flight radar. So yes, if I
<v Speaker 1>see an unidentified object on radar, you're gonna report it.
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's the only thing you're looking for if
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the radar is you're looking for unidentified
<v Speaker 1>objects that are not on the flight tracker. And the
<v Speaker 1>whole argument being made is that the plane went dark
<v Speaker 1>off the flight tracker. So you've got a plane on
<v Speaker 1>your radar off the flight tracker. You don't give a
<v Speaker 1>shit if it's technically in Malaysia's zone. If you're Thailand,
<v Speaker 1>we don't care about that. You're seeing an unidentified object
<v Speaker 1>on your radar. It might be coming for you, it
<v Speaker 1>might be coming from one of your buildings or your towns.
<v Speaker 1>So that argument is really dumb, and it's contraindicated by
<v Speaker 1>itself if you were trying to avoid radar, you wouldn't
<v Speaker 1>turn off the A car system. You would leave it on.
<v Speaker 1>You would leave the ACR system on. So it looks
<v Speaker 1>like you're just having an emergency event when you're actually
<v Speaker 1>hijacking the plane. The last thing you want to do
<v Speaker 1>is bring attention to yourself by turning the system off
<v Speaker 1>that's tracking you. If you do that, then everybody's gonna
<v Speaker 1>be looking for you on your radars, and they're gonna
<v Speaker 1>see you because spoil alert. Civilian airliners don't have stealth capabilities.
<v Speaker 1>That's a good clip. Okay. The German Wings pilot in
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen who uh took that plane down. He locked
<v Speaker 1>the co pilot out and he didn't go on a
<v Speaker 1>joy ride for eight hours. He crashed the plane in
<v Speaker 1>under ten minutes. He basically just flew it directly into
<v Speaker 1>a mountain. That's what you do when you're a suicidal pilot.
<v Speaker 1>You cannot lock people out of the cockpit for eight hours.
<v Speaker 1>This myth where he's gonna like go super high, knock
<v Speaker 1>everybody out and all this bullshit. No, not in a
<v Speaker 1>boweing triple seven. And what's gonna happen is someone going
<v Speaker 1>to break through one of the panels, or they're gonna
<v Speaker 1>get through the door or whatever, they're gonna get to you.
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens in a high tension situation, where all
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden you're locking people out and doing some
<v Speaker 1>crazy shit to the plane. So that's not what happened
<v Speaker 1>with MH three seven zero. Now the simulator data. Now,
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wise, I believe, in New York Magazine was the
<v Speaker 1>first one to promote the misinformation that I still hear
<v Speaker 1>spread out of there all the day. So do your
<v Speaker 1>best to fight this misinformation that the simulator route was
<v Speaker 1>being practiced by the pilot. This is couldn't be more fake,
<v Speaker 1>could not be more fake. Jeff Wise spread it because
<v Speaker 1>he's the biggest source of misinformation about m A three
<v Speaker 1>seven zero. That's not being me being mean. That's just
<v Speaker 1>a factual statement. Jeff Wise has to live with the
<v Speaker 1>decisions that he's made in his life, and writing that
<v Speaker 1>article that claimed that the pilot was practicing the simulator
<v Speaker 1>data was super fake. It was wrong. He should feel
<v Speaker 1>bad for doing it, and he should apologize for doing it,
<v Speaker 1>because here you go, this is an actual route of
<v Speaker 1>the simulator data over the top of various real flights
<v Speaker 1>of one to five to zero that was from Jetta
<v Speaker 1>or from qual Import to Jedta. You can see it's
<v Speaker 1>a direct match. He was actually scheduled to fly this
<v Speaker 1>route February fourth, two days before he was practicedor two
<v Speaker 1>days after he was practicing it. So no, he was
<v Speaker 1>not practicing the simulator data the route that was all fake.
<v Speaker 1>He was literally just practicing the route that he was
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to fly. This is not this is not the
<v Speaker 1>route MHS three seven zero took that we're looking at
<v Speaker 1>here either. This is also not the route MHE three
<v Speaker 1>seven zero took. I just want to point that out too,
<v Speaker 1>because this is just probably the biggest point I should
<v Speaker 1>point out from this year is that Jeff Wise literally
<v Speaker 1>just made up a complete fiction where a non matching
<v Speaker 1>route he claimed matched what happened to M three seven
<v Speaker 1>zero not even remotely close, complete fiction, completely just from
<v Speaker 1>whole cloth. Jeff Wise invented a completely fake narrative that
<v Speaker 1>did contraindicated by reality, and the FBI and officials corrected it.
<v Speaker 1>And yet people still to this day, ten years later,
<v Speaker 1>still believe that the misinformation that Jeff Wise intentionally spread
<v Speaker 1>about M ah three seven zero. Honestly, Jeff Wise is
<v Speaker 1>the last person on the planet that should ever, ever,
<v Speaker 1>ever talk to anybody else about misinformation. Like literally, he's
<v Speaker 1>the worst offender. Okay, So there you go, And just
<v Speaker 1>here's a direct quote from the officials, just in case
<v Speaker 1>anybody really is still trying to spread this myth. So
<v Speaker 1>the people that are out there pushing this shit that
<v Speaker 1>the pilot did it, you gotta just start coming to
<v Speaker 1>accept reality. There's no evidence the pilot did it. We
<v Speaker 1>have examined the pilot and the first officer, and we
<v Speaker 1>are quite satisfied with their background, their training, and their
<v Speaker 1>mental health. We are not of the opinion that it
<v Speaker 1>could have been an event committed by the pilot. Simple
<v Speaker 1>as that. Now, let me just add hoc real and
<v Speaker 1>point out that a lot for a lot of people,
<v Speaker 1>the problem is they don't have an inner monologue. They
<v Speaker 1>don't have the ability to think for themselves. And for
<v Speaker 1>those people, they need there to be a normal explanation
<v Speaker 1>for what happened in this plane. There must be in
<v Speaker 1>their minds, because in their reality, their reality is so
<v Speaker 1>plain and fake that there is no room for an
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary thing to occur. There's no room for a narrative
<v Speaker 1>outside what they're told to believe to happen. And so
<v Speaker 1>for those people, they have to ignore all of this
<v Speaker 1>because they need there to be some plane Jane explanation
<v Speaker 1>for where this plane went. But there is not. There
<v Speaker 1>is not one of those explanations. It is, in fact,
<v Speaker 1>we've ruled them out all out tonight conclusively. The plane
<v Speaker 1>didn't go to the South Indian Ocean, didn't crash in
<v Speaker 1>the ocean at all. The debris contry indicates the entire
<v Speaker 1>search effort. The debris doesn't even prove the plane crashed.
<v Speaker 1>We have no evidence for the plane even crashing, no
<v Speaker 1>conclusive evidence. And this is what the family members were
<v Speaker 1>also saying. At some point, people have to go back
<v Speaker 1>and go like, why am I believing the things that
<v Speaker 1>I'm choosing to believe. All that I did was come
<v Speaker 1>into this whole situation with no biases. I had no biases.
<v Speaker 1>I had an open mind, although I didn't I didn't
<v Speaker 1>believe that we had magic orbs or any of that.
<v Speaker 1>But I came in with no biases, and it took
<v Speaker 1>a look at a fresh look at all the evidence
<v Speaker 1>with you know, an unbiased perspective, and the story that
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing tonight is what I concluded based on the evidence,
<v Speaker 1>all the evidence that's out there, not just like a
<v Speaker 1>cherry picking of the evidence like you see in a
<v Speaker 1>lot of these YouTube videos, but the total totality of
<v Speaker 1>the evidence, even evidence that people don't want to believe. Now,
<v Speaker 1>some of the other scenarios, like to shoot down and
<v Speaker 1>the emergency event scenarios that I here discuss some cases,
<v Speaker 1>the problem with those is the same problem with the
<v Speaker 1>fire emergency event without the orbs, where's the plane? Where's
<v Speaker 1>the debris field? If a plane was shot down in
<v Speaker 1>the sky, the debris is gonna shatter over tens of miles.
<v Speaker 1>People are gonna be picking it up in their backyards.
<v Speaker 1>There's no way you could cover up a debris a
<v Speaker 1>Boeing Triple seven and two hundred and thirty nine people
<v Speaker 1>exploding over somewhere. There'd be people YouTube videos of plane
<v Speaker 1>blowing up in the sky. Even emergency events don't make
<v Speaker 1>any sense if it was some kind of fire. We
<v Speaker 1>need the videos to be real because we can't otherwise
<v Speaker 1>explain where the plane went up, where the plane went down,
<v Speaker 1>where is it? Then plane was on fire, it can't
<v Speaker 1>fly forever where to go. And there's other variations on
<v Speaker 1>these theories as well. People have claimed that they've seen
<v Speaker 1>debris in the water when they're not. They're just you know,
<v Speaker 1>there's that mind I forget what that psychology term is,
<v Speaker 1>where they just imagine seeing stuff when they're not seeing it.
<v Speaker 1>So there are no real legitimate other competing theories. It
<v Speaker 1>had to be a state sponsored operation and all the
<v Speaker 1>states involved, including the United States. We're blaming the United
<v Speaker 1>States saying that they know now quickly the science. Okay,
<v Speaker 1>I readid the science just simplified it. Just let's just
<v Speaker 1>simplify it. Zero point energy number one. That's the number
<v Speaker 1>one discovery that we can conclude from the videos. Zero
<v Speaker 1>point energy is real. It's the missing link in physics.
<v Speaker 1>It explains mass, inertia, gravity, dark energy, and dark matter,
<v Speaker 1>just all the things that we don't understand. It turns
<v Speaker 1>out explains them all. Some examples, if you want to read,
<v Speaker 1>would be plank ether hypothesis by fried Wart Winterberg. A
<v Speaker 1>beautiful theory. And the beauty of the zero point energy
<v Speaker 1>in the ether hypothesis is that this theory in science
<v Speaker 1>sits directly on top of our current perspective of physics
<v Speaker 1>and cosmology. And when I say that, I mean that
<v Speaker 1>you can add this vacuum energy in and it doesn't
<v Speaker 1>change anything about our reality at all. So physics still works.
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to rewrite everything. Bravo sweet. And then
<v Speaker 1>of course the OG, the final boss, the King of
<v Speaker 1>gatekeep disclosure hal put off in space time metric engineering,
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the DRDs. And then gravity is a
<v Speaker 1>zero point fluctuation force. These are two of my favorite
<v Speaker 1>papers ever that explain how you can manipulate space time
<v Speaker 1>and why gravity is not a fundamental force but in
<v Speaker 1>fact just an induced pressure effect based on relative energy
<v Speaker 1>densities of zero point energy, meaning the energy densities are
<v Speaker 1>like the way the peaks and the valleys of the
<v Speaker 1>amount of energy in space time. Okay, space time engineering.
<v Speaker 1>So some of the best papers about space time engineering
<v Speaker 1>traversible wormholes, stargates and negative Energy by Eric W. Davis
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the duds. And warp Drives, Dark
<v Speaker 1>Energy Manipulation of Extra Dimensions by also Eric W. Davis.
<v Speaker 1>These papers basically explain how we can produce negative energy
<v Speaker 1>and make warp drives and wormholes, and how you can
<v Speaker 1>survive a wormhole, and they actually corroborate what we see
<v Speaker 1>in the videos in terms of a release of photons
<v Speaker 1>happening and like this umbra effect that we see occur
<v Speaker 1>in the videos. So those are extremely important to understand
<v Speaker 1>how warp drives are not just fiction. That like the
<v Speaker 1>number one physicists that works with the government on Black
<v Speaker 1>Projects is writing papers explaining exactly how to produce negative energy,
<v Speaker 1>while all the mainstream academics are going negative energy is
<v Speaker 1>an exotic substance. Meanwhile, this guy's going, no, it's a
<v Speaker 1>pressure effect, and here's how we can make a negative
<v Speaker 1>pressure effect. It's a negative energy and this is how
<v Speaker 1>we then can make warp drive. Well, that's quite the
<v Speaker 1>shift between academia and the Black Project physicists. Maybe we
<v Speaker 1>should go with the Black Project physicists on this one.
<v Speaker 1>And then my favorite guy, Salvator Pais, US Navy engineer,
<v Speaker 1>says that I'm probably gonna get myself killed if I
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing this, But you know what, we don't care.
<v Speaker 1>Salvator Paise, his patents are one hundred percent real, one
<v Speaker 1>thousand percent real. He deserves the credit for his patents,
<v Speaker 1>specifically in this case, high energy electromagnetic field generator. This
<v Speaker 1>is how we can produce electromagnetic field intensities that are
<v Speaker 1>not believed to be possible under normal circumstances. The way
<v Speaker 1>this is possible is via the ether. If you add
<v Speaker 1>in the ether, if you say that space time is
<v Speaker 1>not empty, then it opens the door to now achieving
<v Speaker 1>energy densities that are beyond what conventional physics thought was possible.
<v Speaker 1>And this allows us to get to points where we
<v Speaker 1>can get up towards the Swinger limit where now spacetime
<v Speaker 1>reality breaks down, aka, we produce a wormhole. Simple right.
<v Speaker 1>And then his other patent, my favorite one actually is
<v Speaker 1>the gravity high frequency gravitational Waves Generator, where we learn
<v Speaker 1>that there is a relationship between high frequencies and manipulating gravity,
<v Speaker 1>manipulating the zero point energy, and that once we do this,
<v Speaker 1>it opens the door to everything you see in Star Trek,
<v Speaker 1>warp drives, wormholes. You know. It also points out that
<v Speaker 1>quantum effects at the macroscopic scale are what we're doing,
<v Speaker 1>and we're achieving it via superconductivity. If you listen to
<v Speaker 1>Salvage for Payise, it's all about cold plasmas, non equilibrium plasmas,
<v Speaker 1>and the way that we are breaking through the ultra
<v Speaker 1>violet catastrophe. Where we would say that you can't amplify
<v Speaker 1>energy beyond this limit, is that we are breaking equilibrium
<v Speaker 1>that only applies for equilibrium thermodynamics. This is why Salvator
<v Speaker 1>Paies quotes Eliah Pregagene. Why because Elia Pregagene did his
<v Speaker 1>work on non equilibrium thermodynamics. If you break something into
<v Speaker 1>a non equilibrium thermon state and then stabilize it in
<v Speaker 1>that form, you can go beyond what we think is possible.
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Now, how do you do that? I'm gonna
<v Speaker 1>tell you exactly how to do that. You create your
<v Speaker 1>non equilibrium cold plasma ball manipulated of bi magnetic fields,
<v Speaker 1>and you pull the electrons from the ions. So you
<v Speaker 1>have your electrons all combined over here, and we see
<v Speaker 1>them as the yellow little shape you shape in there,
<v Speaker 1>the fusion shape, and you separate them and then you
<v Speaker 1>get them stuck that way, and now you've got a
<v Speaker 1>huge energy density ball. That's how you do it. And
<v Speaker 1>then you take those huge energy density balls and you
<v Speaker 1>jam them together just like you would a couple of magnets.
<v Speaker 1>And what happens, well, if you get too much energy,
<v Speaker 1>too much force, apparently you rip through space time. Now,
<v Speaker 1>if you want more papers about those concepts as opposed
<v Speaker 1>to me just explaining it to you, I recommend the
<v Speaker 1>following four papers on non equilibrium plasmas. Vortex motion can
<v Speaker 1>be used to stabilize ball the plasma. As I mentioned,
<v Speaker 1>this is mentioned in multiple papers, so you can read.
<v Speaker 1>There's several EVO papers by Ken Shoulders on exotic vacuum objects,
<v Speaker 1>which are these cold plasmas. My favorite one is probably
<v Speaker 1>permittivity transitions, which discusses how the plasma basically manipulates space
<v Speaker 1>time and how you're manipulating the permiability and primitivity of
<v Speaker 1>space time, which is how we can start to do
<v Speaker 1>impossible things that are we would call free energy force,
<v Speaker 1>free time harmonic plasmoids by Jack the Chamkin. We actually
<v Speaker 1>just found out that he replied to somebody on Reddit
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's like eighty five, eighty six, maybe even
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven. Now he wrote a paper. This paper is
<v Speaker 1>all about how to stabilize your plasma ball using vortex's
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what this this pulp paper is basically about
<v Speaker 1>how to make a ball plasma and make it stabilized
<v Speaker 1>crazy and then of course ball lightning study by once
<v Speaker 1>again Eric W. Davis shows up again. This ball lightning
<v Speaker 1>study has a normal ass name like ball lightning study.
<v Speaker 1>It's actually all about uh like coherent stabilized plasmas and
<v Speaker 1>how to extract energy from them, like their applications of
<v Speaker 1>the plasmas wild. They always give them weird names because
<v Speaker 1>then nobody will ever look at them than I did.
<v Speaker 1>And then cold fusion. Okay, so cold fusion? Why are
<v Speaker 1>Why is cold fusion related? Because the heat signatures of
<v Speaker 1>the orbs that that that yellow shape, that tesla shape
<v Speaker 1>that we see, that's that's a fusion. Go look at
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Energies website and fusion. You see that
<v Speaker 1>exact same heat signature. It's a very distinct heat signature
<v Speaker 1>of fusion, the hotter parts of the electrons the colder
<v Speaker 1>parts of the ions. And then read Salvatorpius is plasma
<v Speaker 1>a confusion pression or plasma compression fusion device. Where his
<v Speaker 1>equations seven eighty nine talk about amplifying energy, and this
<v Speaker 1>is where I mentioned the ultraviolet catastrophe that says, well,
<v Speaker 1>you can't really amplify it beyond a certain degree. And
<v Speaker 1>what salvat or pais is saying here is yes you can,
<v Speaker 1>and this is the thing that would get me killed.
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just gonna say is that we can amplify
<v Speaker 1>energy beyond what the ultraviolet catastrophe thinks, and we do
<v Speaker 1>it by conditioning the vacuum conditional possibilities. How do we
<v Speaker 1>get around it. We change the conditions, we change the
<v Speaker 1>permeability and primitivity of free space, and then we can
<v Speaker 1>amplify energy infinitely, infinite energy. Free energy is one hundred
<v Speaker 1>percent possible and real, but it also is probably gonna
<v Speaker 1>lead to the end of the world. Spoiler alert. Okay,
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go through all this. Oh maybe through
<v Speaker 1>attleb this so the debunk stuff, people who say the
<v Speaker 1>videos are fake, whatever, I do separate stuff going through
<v Speaker 1>all the debunk stuff. But I just want to point
<v Speaker 1>out we had one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty.
<v Speaker 1>No one ever came forward with any evidence that they
<v Speaker 1>made the videos. You would have to have better VFX
<v Speaker 1>skills than people who did, Like top Gun Maverick. There's
<v Speaker 1>a really funny comment on redd early on about like
<v Speaker 1>all the requirements that somebody would have had just to
<v Speaker 1>like get the engineering of the planes scaled down correctly.
<v Speaker 1>Like even just doing that is like a movie magic
<v Speaker 1>that people have to do. Lead editor of Marvel's Studios
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Ford, early on, I think it was with Total
<v Speaker 1>Disclosure podcast he was friends with Jeffrey Ford. Jeffrey Ford
<v Speaker 1>reviewed it said it would take like four to six
<v Speaker 1>months with today's level of technology. And this is again
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that you have to have a storyboard, like
<v Speaker 1>you're presenting this narrative of a fire on board the
<v Speaker 1>plane and all this stuff in the videos, Like this
<v Speaker 1>isn't a situation where you just are like, oh, I'm
<v Speaker 1>just going to add a goofy looking UFO to this video. No,
<v Speaker 1>this is like a whole thing. To make these videos,
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to have better understanding of physics than most
<v Speaker 1>PhDs do. And then just as a joke, you'd have
<v Speaker 1>to understand now not to use low quality nineties video
<v Speaker 1>game effects or how you'd have to know how to
<v Speaker 1>turn a two dimensional cloud picture. One of the big
<v Speaker 1>debunks is that there's a cloud. They claim that there's
<v Speaker 1>cloud pictures, but the problem is that the videos predate
<v Speaker 1>the pictures, so they have a big issue with that.
<v Speaker 1>There's no actual evidence the pictures predate the videos. In fact,
<v Speaker 1>there's the evidence says that they posted the videos by
<v Speaker 1>like two years. And it doesn't matter anyway, because you
<v Speaker 1>can't use two dimensional cloud pictures to make a three
<v Speaker 1>dimensional environment, which we've already proven is required for the videos,
<v Speaker 1>so it's undeniable the videos are real. All the de
<v Speaker 1>bunk attempts to date have fallen woefully short. This includes
<v Speaker 1>the VFX comparison where people have claimed that this nineties
<v Speaker 1>video game. If you think there's a nineties video game
<v Speaker 1>effect in the videos, I showed at the beginning of
<v Speaker 1>this like, I don't really know what to tell you,
<v Speaker 1>but I will go ahead and show you here that
<v Speaker 1>we took an exact overlay of that effect into the video,
<v Speaker 1>like frame by frame, and you can see it right
<v Speaker 1>here on your screen, full screen, and very clearly you
<v Speaker 1>can see whoever told you these things were the same
<v Speaker 1>lie to you. The only frame that's similar is this one,
<v Speaker 1>and it's clearly not a perfect match. In fact, the
<v Speaker 1>middle isn't even close to the same. The middle in
<v Speaker 1>this graphic is some kind of weird plasma ball with
<v Speaker 1>things sticking out of it, and the background is like
<v Speaker 1>a morphous black blob. They so they got like one
<v Speaker 1>partial match on one edge and then claimed the whole
<v Speaker 1>thing matches. But then the next frame it's not even
<v Speaker 1>This frame is not even close the same, and the
<v Speaker 1>next frame after that again not even remotely similar. In fact,
<v Speaker 1>that's it. And then the problem is there's even more
<v Speaker 1>frames now in the visual effect that there's no frames
<v Speaker 1>left in the actual in the real video. So the
<v Speaker 1>number of frames in the graphic seven, but the total
<v Speaker 1>number of frames in the video is only four, so
<v Speaker 1>they have three extra frames also, So this stock effect
<v Speaker 1>was conclusively not used in this video. No one changed
<v Speaker 1>it all around to get it to match. That's not
<v Speaker 1>how stock effects work. The point of the stock effect
<v Speaker 1>is you put the stock effect in there and that's over.
<v Speaker 1>And we can prove that too, because this stock effect
<v Speaker 1>was used in major motion pictures and it was never edited.
<v Speaker 1>It was used in Anchorman, it was used in Starship Troopers,
<v Speaker 1>it was used in Eastbounding Down. It was using majors.
<v Speaker 1>None of them ever changed it. Eastbound and Down made
<v Speaker 1>a goal, it angled it slightly. That was it. So
<v Speaker 1>it's one hundred percent proven. That's not in the videos.
<v Speaker 1>Any other debunks that are worth addressing two more things
<v Speaker 1>I'll show real quick. One is the clip of the
<v Speaker 1>Clouds movie, just because so many people are insistent that
<v Speaker 1>the clouds still move. Oh wait, that didn't work. So
<v Speaker 1>if you're now, if you're just listening to this, I'm
<v Speaker 1>showing a video that was made that speeds up the clouds.
<v Speaker 1>It speeds up the video and shows a portion of it.
<v Speaker 1>There's even a longer version where people went through different
<v Speaker 1>segments and show that all the different segments show evolving clouds.
<v Speaker 1>You just have to speed it up to see it
<v Speaker 1>because the clouds aren't moving very much. There probably wasn't
<v Speaker 1>very much win that night, and but you can see
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the clouds, which is not Some people
<v Speaker 1>try to claim it's some kind of like displacement map.
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they know what displacement maps are, because
<v Speaker 1>this is not displacement that we're looking at. We're looking
<v Speaker 1>at evolving. Evolving means changes and doesn't go back. Displacement
<v Speaker 1>map is just a distortion effect, and this is not
<v Speaker 1>a distortion effect. You're seeing something change and not go
<v Speaker 1>back to where it was before. So that's it's significant
<v Speaker 1>to point out those facts as well. Then you can
<v Speaker 1>see it quite clearly there. And then I just want
<v Speaker 1>to point out for people because for the cloud thing
<v Speaker 1>as well, because a lot of people got hung up
<v Speaker 1>on the cloud song, which admittedly you know, they they
<v Speaker 1>tried their hardest to make the videos go away and
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty extensive. But we do have confirmation that
<v Speaker 1>the photographer who claimed to take photos he did. He
<v Speaker 1>was on a flight to Japan. I mean he got
<v Speaker 1>he at least has a ticket for it. The problem
<v Speaker 1>is the pictures that they were claiming were used in
<v Speaker 1>the Sili video were not taken from that from that flight.
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue. It seems like they were just inserted
<v Speaker 1>into an existing set of photos that already existed on
<v Speaker 1>the internet, and the photographer didn't know because he couldn't
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference. You couldn't tell his own photos. You're
<v Speaker 1>not he taken thousands of photos, right, So you just
<v Speaker 1>insert some photos into an exist and set the photographer
<v Speaker 1>would never never know, And this is why he couldn't
<v Speaker 1>even recognize the photos in question on the website. He
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even recognize the photos. And so what I want
<v Speaker 1>to point out first of all at two things. One
<v Speaker 1>is that there is proof that the photos that he
<v Speaker 1>uploaded from his Japan flight were on the Internet before
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. I'm trying to figure out how to do
<v Speaker 1>this now, Okay, this is how you do it now, Okay, sorry,
<v Speaker 1>here you go. So this picture right here is it
<v Speaker 1>showing it? What is going on here? Oh? I don't know.
<v Speaker 1>It says, oh there it is. Okay, Streamyard, get your
<v Speaker 1>shit together. So this picture right here shows the web
<v Speaker 1>arc and this is one of the photos from the
<v Speaker 1>Japan flight that shows it was on the web archive.
<v Speaker 1>So it shows the photos in question did get archived
<v Speaker 1>prior to twenty fourteen. And yet none of the photos
<v Speaker 1>claimed to be used in the m Stree seven zero
<v Speaker 1>videos are anywhere on the archive prior to videos. In fact,
<v Speaker 1>the first time the pictures in question were ever seen
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the Internet by any of the ar And
<v Speaker 1>this also proves that the website was being crawled by Google,
<v Speaker 1>so you can't claim that the website wasn't being crawled.
<v Speaker 1>This picture right here proves that the photos that Jonas had,
<v Speaker 1>that the real photos Jonahs had, were already uploaded. The
<v Speaker 1>real ones, the fake photos in question, the ones that
<v Speaker 1>were supposedly that we're argued to be used in the
<v Speaker 1>Mah Street seven zero videos were not uploaded until twenty sixteen.
<v Speaker 1>This is a super important fact to point out. It's
<v Speaker 1>not deniable because it's just a factual argument. We can
<v Speaker 1>just look at the evidence again. You can look at
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. Evidence doesn't lie here. It is right here,
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it. These are the images that were
<v Speaker 1>supposedly used in ME three seven zero videos. You can
<v Speaker 1>see at the top of your screen. The first ever
<v Speaker 1>time they were archived was March twenty fourth, two thousy
<v Speaker 1>sixty and they were archived multiple times in that period,
<v Speaker 1>which proves they weren't on the internet before that. They
<v Speaker 1>didn't just magically get missed for five years. They were there,
<v Speaker 1>They're just not there in twenty fourteen. They only appeared
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen. That was the first time, right there.
<v Speaker 1>So anybody tries to claim that images were used to
<v Speaker 1>make the videos, you can claim one, no, they weren't.
<v Speaker 1>There's no possible way two dimensional photograph photos of clouds
<v Speaker 1>could be used to make the three dimensional environment that
<v Speaker 1>was required to make these videos. And two, the cloud
<v Speaker 1>images in question posted the videos by over two years.
<v Speaker 1>Simple as that, if anyone has any contrary evidence, and
<v Speaker 1>if you point that out, generally debunkers go into a
<v Speaker 1>fit because there is no there is no counter there
<v Speaker 1>is no counter effects. Speak for themselves. Okay, let's do
<v Speaker 1>some super chats. Guys. Thank you very much for listening
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate it, especially everybody listening on audio. Thank
<v Speaker 1>you guys very much for listening to the All Solid
<v Speaker 1>Evidence review stream. I hope that you know the world
<v Speaker 1>comes to understand that these videos are really what happened
<v Speaker 1>to the plane. I think it will take a while.
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously a lot to take in, but I think
<v Speaker 1>that that evidence is overwhelming. If you want to help,
<v Speaker 1>the best thing you can do is push on the
<v Speaker 1>United States government to tell the world what they know
<v Speaker 1>about the missing airliner. They know what to happens to
<v Speaker 1>the plane. Even if you don't believe the videos are real,
<v Speaker 1>you have to accept the United States government knows what
<v Speaker 1>happened to the plane, no question, no doubt. The reason
<v Speaker 1>why people don't want to accept that is because then
<v Speaker 1>when they do, they realize that it means the videos
<v Speaker 1>of must be real. Right. Okay, thank you very much
<v Speaker 1>for these super chats. I had to time. Mark Scott,
<v Speaker 1>thank you brother, appreciate you. You've been you're on fire.
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, and the huge one knocking down doors with
<v Speaker 1>hard work. Piece of the families, Yes, and so piece
<v Speaker 1>to the families. Also, the families probably don't The families
<v Speaker 1>probably don't believe this or accept this either, admittedly, but
<v Speaker 1>they never told me to stop, so I would think
<v Speaker 1>it was my scenario. Even if it was somebody who
<v Speaker 1>was going the crazy scenario, if it was me, I
<v Speaker 1>would still be fine with it, because shit, nothing else
<v Speaker 1>is working, nothing else is working. We haven't found anything
<v Speaker 1>in the South Indian Ocean. Might as well push on people
<v Speaker 1>who look at Diego Garcia truth Teller eighty six. Thank you,
<v Speaker 1>rip Ocean Infinity and Malaysia should pay Ashton thirty five million. Yes,
<v Speaker 1>since he solved the mystery. Yeah, they apparently just signed
<v Speaker 1>it today, but they've already been searching and quick update
<v Speaker 1>they are still searching again. But they aren't going to
<v Speaker 1>find anything, as I've already told you. And if you've
<v Speaker 1>reviewed this evidence that you know they're not going to
<v Speaker 1>find anything in the South Indian Ocean. You know they're not. Yeah,
<v Speaker 1>And even the people who say, oh, they're going to
<v Speaker 1>plan something, No, they're not think about all the effort
<v Speaker 1>it would go through to like plant believable debris at
<v Speaker 1>this point in the game that doesn't float and all
<v Speaker 1>all the bodies all it's never gonna happen. They're just
<v Speaker 1>not gonna find anything. And thank you again for that
<v Speaker 1>truth Teller, for that other donation, rabbit Hole, thank you
<v Speaker 1>keep this up. And the CIA is going to bring
<v Speaker 1>back the dart gun for your ass. Watch Cornhole. Brother. Honestly,
<v Speaker 1>I don't even care, man, I don't even care. I
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to live in a world that's a
<v Speaker 1>lie anymore, you know. I just want them to be
<v Speaker 1>like one true thing on this world. It seems like
<v Speaker 1>everything is fake. Academics just big fraud. Media is just
<v Speaker 1>full of shit, governments just committing black operations and hiding
<v Speaker 1>civilization technology. I just want one true thing just to
<v Speaker 1>be pleased on this planet. Lone Wolf, thank you very
<v Speaker 1>much for that donation. What if the CIA produced all
<v Speaker 1>this so this was another thing? What if the CI
<v Speaker 1>did this is like when you think this is like
<v Speaker 1>what I call hitting on nineteen. You're hitting on nineteen here.
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking way too much into it, right, You're like,
<v Speaker 1>how can they be SCIA into a like, think about
<v Speaker 1>how elaborate. So you made a plan to siop somebody
<v Speaker 1>into believing the fake plan using fake videos, Like, it's
<v Speaker 1>just way, way too complicated, and what's the end goal.
<v Speaker 1>The main reason why this is not true despite the
<v Speaker 1>logic that I just threw at you, is that who's
<v Speaker 1>implicated in the video? Oh, the United States military? So
<v Speaker 1>would the CIA if they're doing this, would they implicate themselves? No,
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be an image of a General Atomics drone.
<v Speaker 1>That would be an image of some Chinese drone or
<v Speaker 1>an Iranian drone. If they were sy opping us, They're
<v Speaker 1>not gonna blame themselves. They're gonna have to be a
<v Speaker 1>video of China's aapping the plane because then the disinformation is, oh,
<v Speaker 1>look what China did to it, and look what Iran
<v Speaker 1>did to it. Now we're gonna go to war with Iran.
<v Speaker 1>The way the videos play out, it's only blames them.
<v Speaker 1>And if the CIA did produce it, then the media
<v Speaker 1>would be like trying to spotlight me. CNN would be
<v Speaker 1>having me come on and promote this theory or what
<v Speaker 1>have you, right, because they would want this psyop to
<v Speaker 1>get out there. In fact, As I mentioned in my
<v Speaker 1>last dream, no mainstream media has ever even reached out
<v Speaker 1>to me before, even though I've gone on over one
<v Speaker 1>hundred podcasts detailed explaining the evidence, the psychology of my
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the case and the leaker and all this stuff.
<v Speaker 1>Despite all that fame, if you want to call attention,
<v Speaker 1>maybe mainstreaming has never reached out. That's what tells me
<v Speaker 1>the CIA that I'm right over the target, and this
<v Speaker 1>is a situation with the CIA doesn't want this out
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to wanted it out. Good question, though, and
<v Speaker 1>this is honestly, I don't mean to be rude, but
<v Speaker 1>this is the dumbest argument that I hear out there
<v Speaker 1>is that we're trying to convince other countries that we
<v Speaker 1>have technology that we don't have. That's not a thing
<v Speaker 1>that exists. That's not a thing that exists. I think
<v Speaker 1>people usually when they make this just fault, terrible, terrible argument,
<v Speaker 1>usually they try to say that, oh, well, during the
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan Project, we tried to spread disinfo to like throw
<v Speaker 1>people off. That's a complete that's sabotage. It's claiming that
<v Speaker 1>we have magical technology that we don't have that doesn't work.
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have it, then it just is not
<v Speaker 1>a threat. And if you're gonna do some elaborate show
<v Speaker 1>to try to convince people, this isn't how you do it.
<v Speaker 1>You like leak it covertly to people, not in a
<v Speaker 1>public display now with a real airliner that's really missing. No,
<v Speaker 1>we actually just did it. We actually just did that
<v Speaker 1>to the plane. That's the story that makes sense, not
<v Speaker 1>the story that it's a reverse orn a who know,
<v Speaker 1>super sigh up against me like sorry, Like a lot
<v Speaker 1>of you guys though, you just you go way too down,
<v Speaker 1>far down the rabbit hole because you need there to
<v Speaker 1>need to be always be another layer to everything. For
<v Speaker 1>some people there always needs to be another layer. In
<v Speaker 1>some cases there can be, but discern critical thinking requires
<v Speaker 1>you to understand when to stop. That's what critical thinking.
<v Speaker 1>Is there evidence that there's another layer to it. No,
<v Speaker 1>if the evidence is just you making it up in
<v Speaker 1>your head, that a story that's not evidence. Simple as that,
<v Speaker 1>that's how you did. That's how it works. So thank
<v Speaker 1>you for those donations though, and again I'm not trying
<v Speaker 1>to be rude, but I think it's important to educate
<v Speaker 1>people on that critical thinking works both ways. One is
<v Speaker 1>don't be too blue pilled, but also don't believe that
<v Speaker 1>there's always another layer to everything, and everything must be
<v Speaker 1>a distraction from everything else. Like that's where you just
<v Speaker 1>your way to. You're doing the same thing the blue
<v Speaker 1>pill people are doing, just on the opposite spectrum, end
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum. Mark Scott, Wow, thank you brother, huge donations.
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you man the best. And then lastly, V have
<v Speaker 1>you heard of thunderstorm General? Yes, I have. I've spoken
<v Speaker 1>about it several times. It's not doing what we're talking
<v Speaker 1>about here, It's not anywhere near what we're talking about
<v Speaker 1>here is basically a more efficient carburetor is what has
<v Speaker 1>been told to me, but still neat and still could
<v Speaker 1>be relevant. I do want to talk to Randall Carlson
<v Speaker 1>about that. Okay, any last questions before we close out tonight,
<v Speaker 1>guys from the audience. I'm just looking through see if
<v Speaker 1>I can find any Did I miss anything big that
<v Speaker 1>people don't know? Where did the plane go and what
<v Speaker 1>happened to the people. I think I explained where I
<v Speaker 1>think that the plane went and what happened to people.
<v Speaker 1>But again, the only people that can tell us to
<v Speaker 1>answer these questions about why you would do this. Why
<v Speaker 1>we record this. What actually happened for sure is the
<v Speaker 1>US military, the people that did it. Those are the
<v Speaker 1>people we should be asking the questions. I want to
<v Speaker 1>know they answer those questions too. I want Edward Lynn
<v Speaker 1>to tell me he probably knows the answer right. Truth
<v Speaker 1>teller says, if all flights pre water instruction tells you
<v Speaker 1>your c community is the flotation device where all the
<v Speaker 1>floating is. This is another good point. There's a thousand
<v Speaker 1>pounds of flotation devices missing, and that's just some of
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that floated. It floats. None was ever found.
<v Speaker 1>The point being we just need to use basic logic,
<v Speaker 1>basic critical thinking capabilities. Part of the reason why so
<v Speaker 1>many people are afraid talk to me about m A
<v Speaker 1>three seven zero to have a contentious conversation is because
<v Speaker 1>I bring up points like this and they'll just look
<v Speaker 1>like fools because there is no counterpoints to something like that.
<v Speaker 1>Counterpoint is the oceans really big? It's absurd. You're gonna
<v Speaker 1>get destroyed in a live conversation with making arguments like that.
<v Speaker 1>And then one tact hundred. Thank you very much man.
<v Speaker 1>You guys have been going on fire. I appreciate you guys.
<v Speaker 1>Donations you guys. Thank you m A three seventy X.
<v Speaker 1>You guys are awesome. Yeah, there was another. I deleted
<v Speaker 1>this from the story because there's it got really weird
<v Speaker 1>about what plane was where. But there is another plane
<v Speaker 1>from a Shell company that was disassembled. I can't find
<v Speaker 1>out which of the two models it possibly was. But
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I mainly deleted is because I think
<v Speaker 1>the debris is from m AH three seven zero. I
<v Speaker 1>just think that they tore the plane apart and threw
<v Speaker 1>some of it in the water, or when the plane
<v Speaker 1>was landing at Diegorcia, it was like coming apart and
<v Speaker 1>someone was falling in you know, the Western Indian Ocean.
<v Speaker 1>That's what I think hapened. So that's why I got
<v Speaker 1>read of that. But if you believe the debris was
<v Speaker 1>fake and that they faked all that debris, not all
<v Speaker 1>that debris, only a few pieces, then in that scenario,
<v Speaker 1>there is another plane that got decommissioned like way too early.
<v Speaker 1>There's actually two other planes, but it's hard to tell
<v Speaker 1>which one got decommissioned at the right time. So good
<v Speaker 1>question on that one though as well. That was from
<v Speaker 1>McLean Okay, but yeah, those are great questions. Actually, guys, Okay, guys,
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be it for tonight. Thank you
<v Speaker 1>for joining me on this live stream and on this
<v Speaker 1>special edition of the Heart Trews Podcast on the m
<v Speaker 1>A three seven zero eleven year anniversary, reviewing the all
<v Speaker 1>evidence that shows that the m A three seven zero
<v Speaker 1>videos are undeniably real. I understand the aversion. I understand
<v Speaker 1>people don't like me. I understand that people don't want
<v Speaker 1>this to be real and it's too far out there.
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sorry, it is real. It just is. I'm
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a normal guy living my day to day,
<v Speaker 1>still doing my nine to five and healthcare. It just
<v Speaker 1>bringing you this information because I think it's important that
<v Speaker 1>people know the truth. That's it. That's the only reason
<v Speaker 1>not getting rich and famous off this, not being invited
<v Speaker 1>on Joe Rogan, just doing it. Hope you guys enjoy it.
<v Speaker 1>Have a great night, guys, We'll talk soon. Peace out.
<v Speaker 1>I'm h three seventy X Love you guys.