Nobel predictions and humorous encounters with physics laureates
In this episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast, our very own Matin Durrani and Hamish Johnston explain why they think that this year’s Nobel Prize for Physics could be awarded for work in condensed-matter physics – and who could be in the running. They also reminisce about some of the many Nobel laureates that they have met over the years and the excitement that comes every October when the winners are announced.
SmarAct proudly supports Physics World‘s Nobel Prize coverage, advancing breakthroughs in science and technology through high-precision positioning, metrology and automation. Discover how SmarAct shapes the future of innovation at smaract.com.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
1 00:00:07,839 --> 00:00:10,800 Hello, and welcome to the Physics World Weekly 2 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:11,300 podcast. 3 00:00:11,759 --> 00:00:14,855 I'm Hamish Johnston, and I'm joined today by 4 00:00:14,855 --> 00:00:15,595 my colleague, 5 00:00:15,974 --> 00:00:18,074 Matin Durrani. Hi, Matin. 6 00:00:18,774 --> 00:00:21,015 Hello, Hamish. How are you doing? Yeah. I'm 7 00:00:21,015 --> 00:00:23,515 not too bad and I'm getting very excited 8 00:00:23,814 --> 00:00:25,515 because, of course, next week, 9 00:00:26,500 --> 00:00:29,140 the Nobel Prize in Physics is going to 10 00:00:29,140 --> 00:00:31,620 be awarded. And so, the in this podcast, 11 00:00:31,620 --> 00:00:33,780 we're gonna have a little chat about the 12 00:00:33,780 --> 00:00:36,679 Nobel Prize. We're gonna put through some predictions, 13 00:00:36,899 --> 00:00:39,320 which, of course, we will get completely wrong. 14 00:00:39,545 --> 00:00:40,844 And, we'll also talk 15 00:00:41,304 --> 00:00:44,265 about Nobel Prize winners that we've met in 16 00:00:44,265 --> 00:00:47,145 the past. But first, this episode is brought 17 00:00:47,145 --> 00:00:48,284 to you by SmartAct. 18 00:00:48,984 --> 00:00:51,244 Elevating high precision positioning, 19 00:00:51,704 --> 00:00:52,204 metrology 20 00:00:52,825 --> 00:00:53,645 and automation 21 00:00:54,189 --> 00:00:55,890 to empower your breakthroughs. 22 00:00:56,590 --> 00:00:58,369 Shape the future with 23 00:00:59,070 --> 00:00:59,570 technologies. 24 00:01:07,594 --> 00:01:09,995 So, Matin, first, I thought we'd, we'd go 25 00:01:09,995 --> 00:01:11,375 through some of our predictions 26 00:01:12,075 --> 00:01:15,194 for, next week's Nobel Prize. And and shall 27 00:01:15,194 --> 00:01:17,194 I start off? Well, I mean, you've over 28 00:01:17,194 --> 00:01:18,875 the last few years, we've got this amazing 29 00:01:18,875 --> 00:01:19,375 infographic 30 00:01:19,834 --> 00:01:20,075 that, 31 00:01:20,635 --> 00:01:22,474 contains a list of all down the one 32 00:01:22,474 --> 00:01:24,500 side, it's the list of subject areas that 33 00:01:24,500 --> 00:01:26,500 the prize has been awarded to. And it's 34 00:01:26,500 --> 00:01:28,739 a graphic that kind of maps, year by 35 00:01:28,739 --> 00:01:31,219 year, different areas. So you've been, looking at 36 00:01:31,219 --> 00:01:32,900 that for quite a few years, and it 37 00:01:32,900 --> 00:01:35,780 seems like there's one field that is ripe 38 00:01:35,780 --> 00:01:38,325 for being awarded this year. Yeah. That's right. 39 00:01:38,325 --> 00:01:40,325 I mean, listeners, this is a bit of 40 00:01:40,325 --> 00:01:40,825 numerology. 41 00:01:41,525 --> 00:01:42,025 Basically, 42 00:01:42,484 --> 00:01:43,685 you know, I sort of look at the 43 00:01:43,685 --> 00:01:44,745 numbers, and 44 00:01:45,125 --> 00:01:46,424 I try to decide, 45 00:01:47,204 --> 00:01:51,444 the gaps in years between Nobel Prizes being 46 00:01:51,444 --> 00:01:51,944 awarded 47 00:01:52,439 --> 00:01:53,659 in specific fields. 48 00:01:53,959 --> 00:01:57,479 And according to my, chart, which, you can 49 00:01:57,479 --> 00:02:00,280 see, on the Physics World website, there seems 50 00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:02,679 to be about a 5 year gap on 51 00:02:02,679 --> 00:02:03,179 average 52 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,615 between different disciplines. So you remember, Matin, that 53 00:02:06,615 --> 00:02:09,735 last year, we managed to predict 2 out 54 00:02:09,735 --> 00:02:10,794 of 3 winners 55 00:02:11,175 --> 00:02:13,354 by focusing on those gaps. 56 00:02:14,055 --> 00:02:15,915 There hadn't been a winner in atomic, 57 00:02:16,294 --> 00:02:18,314 molecular, and optical physics 58 00:02:18,629 --> 00:02:19,129 since 59 00:02:19,469 --> 00:02:19,969 2018. 60 00:02:20,310 --> 00:02:22,729 So we predicted that Paul Corkum, 61 00:02:23,030 --> 00:02:25,449 Ferenc Krauss, and Anne Flouillier 62 00:02:25,990 --> 00:02:29,209 would win for their work involving ultra short 63 00:02:29,430 --> 00:02:30,409 laser pulses. 64 00:02:30,814 --> 00:02:34,014 And sure enough, we were right. Well, sort 65 00:02:34,014 --> 00:02:36,034 of right. Krauss and Louwelier 66 00:02:36,414 --> 00:02:38,194 were the winners in 2023. 67 00:02:38,814 --> 00:02:39,634 And unfortunately, 68 00:02:40,334 --> 00:02:42,194 fellow Canadian, Paul Corkum, 69 00:02:42,495 --> 00:02:43,634 was passed over. 70 00:02:44,250 --> 00:02:46,969 Now this year, I'm focusing on the 7 71 00:02:46,969 --> 00:02:50,009 year gap since the last prize was given 72 00:02:50,009 --> 00:02:51,709 for condensed matter physics. 73 00:02:52,009 --> 00:02:53,789 And I think that this field 74 00:02:54,090 --> 00:02:57,224 might just be the award winning one this 75 00:02:57,224 --> 00:02:57,724 year. 76 00:02:58,264 --> 00:03:01,004 But before we talk about some potential condensed 77 00:03:01,064 --> 00:03:01,965 matter winners, 78 00:03:02,264 --> 00:03:04,125 I'm going to go out on a limb 79 00:03:04,264 --> 00:03:06,504 and suggest that it might be 2 years 80 00:03:06,504 --> 00:03:09,004 in a row for atomic, molecular, 81 00:03:09,305 --> 00:03:10,685 and optical physics. 82 00:03:11,030 --> 00:03:14,170 So my first prediction is that Lina Howe 83 00:03:14,389 --> 00:03:15,290 of the Massachusetts 84 00:03:15,750 --> 00:03:16,969 Institute of Technology 85 00:03:17,430 --> 00:03:20,170 is going to win this year's Nobel Prize 86 00:03:20,230 --> 00:03:22,250 for her work on slow light. 87 00:03:22,629 --> 00:03:24,710 This is a a trick, well, it's not 88 00:03:24,710 --> 00:03:26,170 really a trick, it's physics, 89 00:03:26,525 --> 00:03:29,405 Where you can fire light into a gas, 90 00:03:29,405 --> 00:03:30,705 an atomic gas. 91 00:03:31,004 --> 00:03:33,104 And you can slow it right down. 92 00:03:33,645 --> 00:03:35,724 And then you you make a change to 93 00:03:35,724 --> 00:03:38,044 that gas. And you can speed it up 94 00:03:38,044 --> 00:03:40,525 again. So it's almost like you can store 95 00:03:40,525 --> 00:03:42,860 light in a gas. And, you know, that's 96 00:03:42,860 --> 00:03:45,340 an amazing thing. And I think there's some 97 00:03:45,340 --> 00:03:48,860 amazing physics in that. So Lina Hao, that's 98 00:03:48,860 --> 00:03:50,780 my first pick. Because she's she's been on 99 00:03:50,780 --> 00:03:52,620 quite a few of these prediction lists. I 100 00:03:52,620 --> 00:03:54,379 mean, I'm looking back even 10 years ago, 101 00:03:54,379 --> 00:03:55,520 she was on lists, 102 00:03:55,844 --> 00:03:58,084 particularly as a, you know, an outstanding female 103 00:03:58,084 --> 00:04:00,185 researcher and one person who should win. 104 00:04:00,724 --> 00:04:02,084 But, yeah, she's on the list been on 105 00:04:02,084 --> 00:04:03,844 the list for quite a while. It wouldn't 106 00:04:03,844 --> 00:04:04,805 surprise me, but, 107 00:04:05,364 --> 00:04:07,604 over the years, Hamish, I've I've nothing surprises 108 00:04:07,604 --> 00:04:09,349 me about who wins the prize. It's quite 109 00:04:09,349 --> 00:04:11,189 hard to predict, isn't it? You know, some 110 00:04:11,189 --> 00:04:13,430 are nailed so it's only rarely is it 111 00:04:13,430 --> 00:04:15,349 a nailed uncertainty. And I think the Higgs 112 00:04:15,349 --> 00:04:18,230 boson was the 1 year in 2013 that 113 00:04:18,230 --> 00:04:19,669 you were pretty sure that was the one 114 00:04:19,669 --> 00:04:21,430 that was gonna win it. We almost got 115 00:04:21,430 --> 00:04:23,205 it right last year. We picked 2 out 116 00:04:23,205 --> 00:04:25,125 of the 3 winners. But, yeah, it is 117 00:04:25,125 --> 00:04:25,865 very difficult. 118 00:04:26,324 --> 00:04:28,645 And and so, condensed matter, that's my my 119 00:04:28,645 --> 00:04:31,305 next field that I think might be in 120 00:04:31,685 --> 00:04:32,165 for, 121 00:04:32,884 --> 00:04:35,080 for a Nobel Prize. And and this one 122 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:36,920 is is a slight cheat. I mean, I 123 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:38,060 think both of these 124 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:42,139 physicists are, strictly speaking, are condensed matter physicists. 125 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:45,160 But they tend to work in the field 126 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:45,980 of optics. 127 00:04:46,595 --> 00:04:47,634 And those are, 128 00:04:48,035 --> 00:04:50,935 John Pendry of Imperial College London 129 00:04:51,394 --> 00:04:52,294 and Federico 130 00:04:52,915 --> 00:04:53,415 Capasso 131 00:04:53,794 --> 00:04:56,134 of Harvard University in the US. 132 00:04:56,435 --> 00:04:57,574 Now John Pendry, 133 00:04:58,194 --> 00:04:59,175 is a pioneer 134 00:04:59,555 --> 00:05:03,490 of the mathematics that describe how metamaterials 135 00:05:04,430 --> 00:05:04,930 manipulate 136 00:05:05,389 --> 00:05:05,889 light 137 00:05:06,189 --> 00:05:07,649 and other electromagnetic 138 00:05:07,949 --> 00:05:08,449 radiation. 139 00:05:08,829 --> 00:05:10,430 And, you know, he's come up with some 140 00:05:10,430 --> 00:05:12,769 some great ideas, like, for an invisibility 141 00:05:13,069 --> 00:05:13,569 cloak, 142 00:05:13,955 --> 00:05:15,895 manipulating light so that something 143 00:05:16,514 --> 00:05:18,915 disappears. And, you know, people sort of pooh 144 00:05:18,915 --> 00:05:20,514 poohed that when he first came out with 145 00:05:20,514 --> 00:05:23,235 the idea. But, you know, these have been 146 00:05:23,235 --> 00:05:23,735 built, 147 00:05:24,275 --> 00:05:24,775 particularly, 148 00:05:25,395 --> 00:05:26,615 operating from microwaves. 149 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,060 So he was a mathematical 150 00:05:29,439 --> 00:05:30,979 pioneer in that field. 151 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:32,259 And Federico 152 00:05:32,639 --> 00:05:33,139 Capasso 153 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,060 has actually built 154 00:05:35,439 --> 00:05:36,419 lots of metamaterials 155 00:05:37,199 --> 00:05:40,019 that do some amazing things with light. 156 00:05:40,464 --> 00:05:42,725 You know, for example, making flat lenses, 157 00:05:43,105 --> 00:05:46,644 which are really, really useful for modern technology 158 00:05:47,264 --> 00:05:48,004 such as 159 00:05:49,264 --> 00:05:51,345 mobile phones. Because, of course, you want you 160 00:05:51,345 --> 00:05:52,564 want a really high quality 161 00:05:53,024 --> 00:05:55,685 optical system in a mobile phone. And normally, 162 00:05:55,745 --> 00:05:56,040 that 163 00:05:56,759 --> 00:06:00,040 requires a certain thickness. But Capaso and his 164 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:02,360 team have come up with ways of making 165 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,779 very, very thin lenses using metamaterials. 166 00:06:05,319 --> 00:06:08,060 And they're actually commercializing it as well. 167 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:09,399 So, yeah, I think, 168 00:06:10,045 --> 00:06:13,564 Capaso and Pendry double bill is another one. 169 00:06:13,884 --> 00:06:15,824 So what about Umatine? Have you, 170 00:06:16,205 --> 00:06:17,725 who who do you think might win this 171 00:06:17,725 --> 00:06:19,964 year? Well, I think Capaso and Pendry is 172 00:06:19,964 --> 00:06:21,404 a very good shout, Hamish. I mean, they've 173 00:06:21,404 --> 00:06:22,764 been on our list for quite a while. 174 00:06:22,764 --> 00:06:24,525 And I I know Capaso is still doing 175 00:06:24,525 --> 00:06:25,199 amazing work. 176 00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:28,420 We we see papers that he's still, publishing. 177 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:29,759 You know, I'm not quite sure how old 178 00:06:29,759 --> 00:06:31,520 he is, but he's, you know, very, very 179 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,300 active still. So that's a good shout. 180 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:36,720 The other topic that we thought Hamish that 181 00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:39,120 was quite likely might win is, you know, 182 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:40,580 this whole area of twisted 183 00:06:40,964 --> 00:06:42,725 Oh, yeah. That's a good one for condensed 184 00:06:42,725 --> 00:06:44,485 matter as well. So that is condensed matter. 185 00:06:44,485 --> 00:06:45,845 So that's the idea. You have these very 186 00:06:45,845 --> 00:06:47,145 thin carbon sheets, 187 00:06:47,524 --> 00:06:49,605 but you you have 2 layers, but they're 188 00:06:49,605 --> 00:06:51,925 misaligned in terms of their molecular structure by 189 00:06:51,925 --> 00:06:52,824 a certain angle. 190 00:06:53,444 --> 00:06:55,670 And, that was one of our breakthroughs of 191 00:06:55,670 --> 00:06:57,689 the year. And I think was it 2018? 192 00:06:58,069 --> 00:07:00,230 You basically got this new platform for exploring 193 00:07:00,230 --> 00:07:02,470 all sorts of exciting condensed matter physics. 194 00:07:03,270 --> 00:07:05,430 And the person who led that work was 195 00:07:05,430 --> 00:07:09,430 also MIT, and that's, Pablo Gerilo Herrero. Hope 196 00:07:09,430 --> 00:07:10,365 I've got his name right, 197 00:07:11,404 --> 00:07:13,245 who has sort of stacked these sheets together 198 00:07:13,245 --> 00:07:14,365 and done a lot of the great work 199 00:07:14,365 --> 00:07:16,204 in that area. So that's, 200 00:07:16,764 --> 00:07:19,324 if that wins, that's quite unusual because that's 201 00:07:19,324 --> 00:07:22,044 quite recent work. And it's not always that 202 00:07:22,044 --> 00:07:23,849 the Nobel Prize goes to work that's done 203 00:07:23,849 --> 00:07:25,449 in the last couple of years, but you 204 00:07:25,449 --> 00:07:26,729 never know that could be in with a 205 00:07:26,729 --> 00:07:29,529 shout. But I know from, your chats that 206 00:07:29,529 --> 00:07:31,209 you've had with the people who award the 207 00:07:31,209 --> 00:07:32,729 prizes, you know, we know that they do 208 00:07:32,729 --> 00:07:35,069 it very rigorously, and often prizes get nominated, 209 00:07:36,810 --> 00:07:38,889 numerous times. And I think that plays a 210 00:07:38,889 --> 00:07:41,104 a role in which prizes get awarded. And 211 00:07:41,104 --> 00:07:41,604 sometimes, 212 00:07:42,225 --> 00:07:43,745 you know, people like Peter Higgs had to 213 00:07:43,745 --> 00:07:46,144 wait sort of 50 years before, his prize 214 00:07:46,144 --> 00:07:48,164 from the work he originally did. So 215 00:07:48,865 --> 00:07:50,625 that might be in with a shout, perhaps 216 00:07:50,625 --> 00:07:52,464 less of a shout because it's quite recent 217 00:07:52,464 --> 00:07:55,910 only because of that. But certainly twisted Graphene 218 00:07:55,910 --> 00:07:57,910 is, yeah, one area to keep an eye 219 00:07:57,910 --> 00:07:59,930 on. Well, that's enough about the future, Hamish. 220 00:07:59,990 --> 00:08:01,430 Over the years, me and you and the 221 00:08:01,430 --> 00:08:02,870 rest of the physics world team have met 222 00:08:02,870 --> 00:08:04,970 all sorts of Nobel Prize winning physicists. 223 00:08:06,150 --> 00:08:07,595 So you've got a story up your sleeve 224 00:08:07,595 --> 00:08:08,894 about about Bert 225 00:08:09,194 --> 00:08:11,694 Brockhouse. Do you wanna remind people who 226 00:08:12,074 --> 00:08:14,735 Bert Brockhouse was? He's a Canadian, wasn't he? 227 00:08:14,875 --> 00:08:17,295 Yeah. That's right. So so Bert Brockhouse, 228 00:08:17,834 --> 00:08:20,095 I think was the first Nobel Laureate 229 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,479 that I ever met, and this was years 230 00:08:22,479 --> 00:08:22,979 before 231 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,139 I joined Physics World. 232 00:08:25,439 --> 00:08:27,360 And, you know, in in the run up 233 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:29,220 to every Nobel Prize, actually, 234 00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:32,000 I think I I think back to that 235 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:33,394 day. It was in 1994. 236 00:08:34,334 --> 00:08:36,674 And, I had just woken up in Hamilton, 237 00:08:36,815 --> 00:08:39,954 Ontario, which is sort of a, an industrial 238 00:08:40,014 --> 00:08:40,514 city, 239 00:08:41,294 --> 00:08:44,735 just outside of Toronto. And the CBC News 240 00:08:44,735 --> 00:08:45,475 came on. 241 00:08:45,870 --> 00:08:48,509 And the announcement was that Bert Brakhos had 242 00:08:48,509 --> 00:08:50,529 just won the Nobel Prize for Physics. 243 00:08:50,990 --> 00:08:52,509 And at the time, I was doing a 244 00:08:52,509 --> 00:08:56,429 PhD at McMaster University. And Brakhos was a 245 00:08:56,429 --> 00:08:57,570 professor emeritus 246 00:08:58,105 --> 00:08:58,845 at McMaster. 247 00:08:59,384 --> 00:09:01,384 And so there was an instant connection. And 248 00:09:01,384 --> 00:09:03,225 I was very excited because, you know, I 249 00:09:03,225 --> 00:09:04,745 was I was about to go into the 250 00:09:04,745 --> 00:09:06,745 physics department. And I knew that, 251 00:09:07,225 --> 00:09:09,965 you know, that there would be joyous mayhem 252 00:09:10,105 --> 00:09:11,980 when I got there. But I also had 253 00:09:11,980 --> 00:09:13,539 a bit of a a bit more of 254 00:09:13,539 --> 00:09:14,759 a personal connection, 255 00:09:15,299 --> 00:09:17,379 I would say. Because a few years earlier, 256 00:09:17,379 --> 00:09:18,279 I had spent 257 00:09:18,659 --> 00:09:19,480 some time, 258 00:09:20,100 --> 00:09:21,480 at the Chalk River, 259 00:09:22,019 --> 00:09:22,519 laboratories, 260 00:09:23,379 --> 00:09:24,839 sort of a national laboratory 261 00:09:25,220 --> 00:09:25,959 in Canada 262 00:09:26,475 --> 00:09:29,115 in the neutron is it the neutron physics 263 00:09:29,115 --> 00:09:31,914 branch or the neutron science branch? I can't 264 00:09:31,914 --> 00:09:34,394 quite remember the name. But that branch was 265 00:09:34,394 --> 00:09:34,894 founded 266 00:09:35,355 --> 00:09:37,774 by Bert Brockhouse. And he won 267 00:09:38,075 --> 00:09:39,375 the, 1994 268 00:09:39,754 --> 00:09:41,855 Nobel Prize for his work on, 269 00:09:42,449 --> 00:09:45,589 inelastic neutron scattering. So he was a pioneer 270 00:09:45,730 --> 00:09:48,949 in using neutrons to study the dynamics 271 00:09:49,730 --> 00:09:52,709 of solid materials, essentially bouncing neutrons 272 00:09:53,169 --> 00:09:53,829 off atoms 273 00:09:54,209 --> 00:09:56,629 and working out their vibrational modes. 274 00:09:56,995 --> 00:09:59,335 That's what, that's what Brakhos did. 275 00:10:00,035 --> 00:10:02,195 And that was a fantastic day. Yet, 276 00:10:02,675 --> 00:10:04,455 I remember going into the university, 277 00:10:05,554 --> 00:10:08,195 and the physics department. And just as I 278 00:10:08,195 --> 00:10:09,014 came in, 279 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:11,460 Jules Carbot, who is, 280 00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:15,620 unfortunately, he's since passed away, but a theoretical 281 00:10:15,759 --> 00:10:17,539 physicist who studied superconductivity 282 00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:20,339 came skipping down the hall. 283 00:10:20,639 --> 00:10:23,039 And, as I passed him, he punched the 284 00:10:23,039 --> 00:10:25,345 air And he said, Bert Brackhaus, 285 00:10:25,725 --> 00:10:26,784 son of a gun. 286 00:10:27,965 --> 00:10:29,884 And this this is my this is my 287 00:10:29,884 --> 00:10:32,764 memory of walking into the physics department. And 288 00:10:32,764 --> 00:10:35,345 people were really, really happy about it. Brackhaus 289 00:10:35,404 --> 00:10:36,240 was the first, 290 00:10:36,879 --> 00:10:38,339 Nobel Prize winner 291 00:10:38,799 --> 00:10:39,299 associated 292 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:42,559 with McMaster University in Amatine. You've been to 293 00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:45,120 the University of Bristol and Cambridge, which, you 294 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:48,000 know, has no no shortage of of Nobel 295 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:49,700 laureates. But this was the first 296 00:10:50,254 --> 00:10:50,754 McMaster, 297 00:10:51,615 --> 00:10:54,894 Nobel laureate. So everybody was very happy. And 298 00:10:54,894 --> 00:10:56,434 there were endless celebrations. 299 00:10:57,054 --> 00:10:57,375 And, 300 00:10:58,014 --> 00:11:00,355 it was very nice. I remember meeting Brockhouse 301 00:11:00,414 --> 00:11:01,075 and discovering 302 00:11:01,534 --> 00:11:03,215 that he lived in this in one of 303 00:11:03,215 --> 00:11:05,909 my favorite areas of Hamilton, this sort of 304 00:11:06,149 --> 00:11:08,089 semi rural neighborhood, 305 00:11:08,789 --> 00:11:10,789 on the Niagara Escarpment. So he had a 306 00:11:10,789 --> 00:11:11,929 chat about that. 307 00:11:12,470 --> 00:11:12,970 And, 308 00:11:13,589 --> 00:11:15,829 yeah, it was a it was a lovely 309 00:11:15,909 --> 00:11:18,565 it was a really lovely day. And so 310 00:11:18,565 --> 00:11:19,464 every October, 311 00:11:20,004 --> 00:11:22,084 I think back to that day. And, you 312 00:11:22,084 --> 00:11:23,705 know, I've got some nice thoughts 313 00:11:24,964 --> 00:11:28,084 about that. So, yeah, that's, I I've written, 314 00:11:28,325 --> 00:11:30,840 something about that for the for the website. 315 00:11:31,460 --> 00:11:32,820 So I'll have a look at that. So 316 00:11:32,820 --> 00:11:35,799 what about you, Matin? You've had, some encounters 317 00:11:35,860 --> 00:11:38,500 with Nobel Prize winners as well. Well, I 318 00:11:38,500 --> 00:11:40,019 had an incident a bit like yours. It 319 00:11:40,019 --> 00:11:42,179 was early 9 I think 91, actually, when 320 00:11:42,179 --> 00:11:44,419 I was at the, Cavendish Laboratory, which was 321 00:11:44,419 --> 00:11:47,004 the department of physics at Cambridge. And the 322 00:11:47,004 --> 00:11:48,845 work I was involved in was in soft 323 00:11:48,845 --> 00:11:50,764 matter physics. And that was the year when 324 00:11:50,764 --> 00:11:53,745 Pierre Gilles de Jean, the the, Frenchman, 325 00:11:54,045 --> 00:11:55,884 won the Nobel Prize that year. And I 326 00:11:55,884 --> 00:11:56,384 remember, 327 00:11:57,004 --> 00:11:59,585 you know, there was great, celebration. He wasn't 328 00:11:59,809 --> 00:12:02,129 at the Cavendish Laboratory, but the Cavendish had 329 00:12:02,129 --> 00:12:04,209 a real expertise in soft matter physics. And 330 00:12:04,209 --> 00:12:06,129 there was a real delight that this field 331 00:12:06,129 --> 00:12:07,970 of physics that perhaps had gone under the 332 00:12:07,970 --> 00:12:10,529 radar was being recognized by the award of 333 00:12:10,529 --> 00:12:12,449 a prize. And I remember that year, you 334 00:12:12,449 --> 00:12:12,945 know, 335 00:12:13,345 --> 00:12:14,965 de Gein had done a lot of work 336 00:12:15,105 --> 00:12:17,184 with Sam Edwards at Cambridge, and he didn't 337 00:12:17,184 --> 00:12:18,544 win the prize that year. But there was 338 00:12:18,544 --> 00:12:20,565 no hard feelings. It was just a feeling 339 00:12:20,865 --> 00:12:21,445 that really, 340 00:12:22,625 --> 00:12:24,625 glad that that field had been recognized by 341 00:12:24,625 --> 00:12:26,865 the Nobel committee. But I think, actually, correct 342 00:12:26,865 --> 00:12:28,065 me if I'm wrong, Hamish, I think that 343 00:12:28,065 --> 00:12:28,799 was the last 344 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:31,600 time that only one person won the Nobel 345 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,879 Prize for Physics Oh, it could be. Yeah. 346 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,959 Now it's very much routinely shared with people. 347 00:12:36,959 --> 00:12:37,459 And, 348 00:12:37,839 --> 00:12:40,100 you know, that was, you know, an unusual 349 00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:42,240 time, because it just went to him. And 350 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:44,154 that that's very much it's 2 or 3 351 00:12:44,154 --> 00:12:45,695 people share it routinely. 352 00:12:46,154 --> 00:12:48,075 Normally, it is. Yeah. It's funny. You've just 353 00:12:48,154 --> 00:12:49,295 you've mentioned Degen, 354 00:12:49,675 --> 00:12:52,495 and a memory of Degen has come back 355 00:12:52,555 --> 00:12:54,815 into my mind. And it was at McMaster, 356 00:12:55,940 --> 00:12:57,700 when I was doing my p h PhD 357 00:12:57,700 --> 00:12:58,440 at McMaster. 358 00:12:58,899 --> 00:13:00,120 DeJenne was, 359 00:13:01,220 --> 00:13:01,720 invited, 360 00:13:02,500 --> 00:13:04,200 to the university to speak. 361 00:13:04,580 --> 00:13:06,919 And he gave a seminar 362 00:13:07,220 --> 00:13:08,039 for undergraduate 363 00:13:08,514 --> 00:13:10,355 students. This was after he'd won the Nobel 364 00:13:10,355 --> 00:13:11,894 Prize, so he was very famous. 365 00:13:12,274 --> 00:13:14,934 And he gave a a seminar for undergraduate 366 00:13:15,235 --> 00:13:18,195 students. But he was so desperate for a 367 00:13:18,195 --> 00:13:18,695 cigarette. 368 00:13:19,475 --> 00:13:21,095 And back in those days, 369 00:13:21,519 --> 00:13:23,360 you know, McMaster was a was a you 370 00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:26,980 couldn't smoke inside in 91 at McMaster University. 371 00:13:27,519 --> 00:13:28,259 And so 372 00:13:28,639 --> 00:13:29,139 the 373 00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:32,320 the seminar was held outside. It was a 374 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:33,379 beautiful day. 375 00:13:33,945 --> 00:13:36,764 And, it was held outside under a tree. 376 00:13:36,904 --> 00:13:39,465 And there was DeJene standing there smoking a 377 00:13:39,465 --> 00:13:39,965 cigarette 378 00:13:40,585 --> 00:13:42,045 with Really? Undergraduates 379 00:13:42,425 --> 00:13:44,105 gathered. He was a very heavy smoker. Gathered 380 00:13:44,105 --> 00:13:47,660 around him. Yeah. So it's yeah. I, yeah. 381 00:13:47,660 --> 00:13:49,279 That that one's just popped. 382 00:13:49,740 --> 00:13:51,680 That one's just popped into my head. 383 00:13:52,300 --> 00:13:54,220 Yeah. I mean, it's funny, you know, thinking 384 00:13:54,220 --> 00:13:56,139 about, you know, we're I think we're so 385 00:13:56,139 --> 00:13:58,540 privileged, if I can say that, at Physics 386 00:13:58,540 --> 00:14:00,879 World that we do get to meet 387 00:14:01,235 --> 00:14:01,894 these people. 388 00:14:02,434 --> 00:14:02,754 And, 389 00:14:03,554 --> 00:14:05,794 another Nobel Prize winner that I I really 390 00:14:05,794 --> 00:14:06,294 enjoyed 391 00:14:07,315 --> 00:14:09,414 meeting and interviewing is Frank Wilczak, 392 00:14:10,595 --> 00:14:11,334 the American, 393 00:14:12,195 --> 00:14:15,634 theoretical physicist who won for his work, on 394 00:14:15,634 --> 00:14:16,695 the strong force. 395 00:14:17,370 --> 00:14:19,370 But the the the interesting thing about that 396 00:14:19,370 --> 00:14:19,870 encounter 397 00:14:20,170 --> 00:14:20,910 is that, 398 00:14:21,850 --> 00:14:23,470 I interviewed him at, 399 00:14:25,210 --> 00:14:26,190 the March meeting, 400 00:14:26,809 --> 00:14:29,370 of the American Physical Society. And it was 401 00:14:29,370 --> 00:14:30,110 an anniversary. 402 00:14:30,649 --> 00:14:33,235 I think it was in some important anniversary 403 00:14:33,934 --> 00:14:37,075 of the, discovery of high temperature superconductivity. 404 00:14:38,495 --> 00:14:40,595 And so we talked about superconductivity. 405 00:14:41,535 --> 00:14:44,095 And that's what Frank Wilczek was really interested 406 00:14:44,095 --> 00:14:45,715 in at the time. 407 00:14:46,149 --> 00:14:47,990 You know, he had, he'd done his work 408 00:14:47,990 --> 00:14:50,230 on the strong force. And now he was 409 00:14:50,230 --> 00:14:51,370 talking about superconductivity 410 00:14:52,389 --> 00:14:54,570 and how the mathematics of superconductivity 411 00:14:55,110 --> 00:14:57,049 can be used to understand other, 412 00:14:57,830 --> 00:14:58,970 aspects of physics. 413 00:14:59,509 --> 00:15:01,110 And, you know, he's he's done some great 414 00:15:01,110 --> 00:15:02,704 work on time crystals, hasn't he? 415 00:15:03,485 --> 00:15:04,924 Yeah. Correct me if I'm wrong, Hamish. I 416 00:15:04,924 --> 00:15:06,384 think it was actually the 2011 417 00:15:07,084 --> 00:15:09,504 meeting, which was the centenary of the discovery 418 00:15:09,804 --> 00:15:10,544 of superconductivity. 419 00:15:11,004 --> 00:15:12,944 But obviously Okay. That included, 420 00:15:13,565 --> 00:15:15,324 but not to include high temperature work as 421 00:15:15,324 --> 00:15:18,009 well. It it was actually it was 2011, 422 00:15:18,009 --> 00:15:19,389 Mateen. Yeah. You're right. 423 00:15:20,009 --> 00:15:21,690 And but but the thing is, I I 424 00:15:21,690 --> 00:15:22,750 was really chuffed, 425 00:15:23,690 --> 00:15:25,450 with Frank, if I can call him that. 426 00:15:25,450 --> 00:15:25,950 Because 427 00:15:26,490 --> 00:15:28,970 4 years later, I was at the Royal 428 00:15:28,970 --> 00:15:30,269 Society in London. 429 00:15:30,615 --> 00:15:32,875 And I was there for a meeting about, 430 00:15:33,894 --> 00:15:35,914 Maxwell and Maxwell's equations. 431 00:15:36,774 --> 00:15:37,274 And, 432 00:15:38,254 --> 00:15:40,235 it we you know, in the coffee break, 433 00:15:40,294 --> 00:15:42,294 we were everybody there was looking at the 434 00:15:42,294 --> 00:15:43,894 portraits. I don't know if you've ever been 435 00:15:43,894 --> 00:15:44,960 to the Royal Society. 436 00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:46,800 It's full of portraits 437 00:15:47,259 --> 00:15:49,980 of all the famous, you know, fellows down 438 00:15:49,980 --> 00:15:51,980 the down the ages. So, you know, you've 439 00:15:51,980 --> 00:15:53,200 got Benjamin Franklin 440 00:15:53,580 --> 00:15:56,399 and Faraday and, you know, all these people. 441 00:15:57,034 --> 00:15:57,434 And, 442 00:15:58,394 --> 00:16:00,554 there's there's one portrait that had a sort 443 00:16:00,554 --> 00:16:01,454 of a saucy 444 00:16:02,154 --> 00:16:03,934 caption with with some innuendo. 445 00:16:04,714 --> 00:16:07,375 And, you know, I remember sort of chuckling, 446 00:16:07,995 --> 00:16:10,554 about it with Frank Wilczek. And he looked 447 00:16:10,554 --> 00:16:13,250 at me. And he said, oh, I know 448 00:16:13,250 --> 00:16:15,409 you. We've met somewhere, haven't we? So you 449 00:16:15,409 --> 00:16:17,329 actually knew a Nobel laureate knew you, actually. 450 00:16:17,329 --> 00:16:20,710 A Nobel laureate actually knew me. Yes. So 451 00:16:21,009 --> 00:16:22,230 that's, yeah. 452 00:16:23,250 --> 00:16:26,074 Another claim to fame with, with Nobel laureate. 453 00:16:26,074 --> 00:16:27,194 Well, I can do one better than that, 454 00:16:27,194 --> 00:16:28,954 Hamish. Because actually, when I was at the, 455 00:16:29,274 --> 00:16:31,834 Cavendish Laboratory in the early nineties, I did 456 00:16:31,834 --> 00:16:33,674 my PhD then. I actually went on to 457 00:16:33,674 --> 00:16:35,115 do a post doc. And one of the 458 00:16:35,115 --> 00:16:39,034 people in the department was Brian Josephson, who 459 00:16:39,034 --> 00:16:39,534 is, 460 00:16:40,110 --> 00:16:41,950 you know, famously won the Nobel Prize in 461 00:16:41,950 --> 00:16:42,450 1973. 462 00:16:42,909 --> 00:16:45,230 He was very young, 33. In fact, he 463 00:16:45,230 --> 00:16:47,889 won it for work on, you know, superconductivity 464 00:16:48,269 --> 00:16:50,269 and quantum tunneling that he'd done much earlier 465 00:16:50,269 --> 00:16:51,889 when he was in early twenties. 466 00:16:52,269 --> 00:16:54,049 And when I was there in the department, 467 00:16:54,190 --> 00:16:56,654 he was just a regular member of staff. 468 00:16:57,914 --> 00:17:00,154 And I think he was assigned to me 469 00:17:00,154 --> 00:17:01,274 to do a kind of, 470 00:17:01,995 --> 00:17:03,274 like a sort of what do you call 471 00:17:03,274 --> 00:17:05,055 it? I'm not like a management, 472 00:17:05,674 --> 00:17:07,835 check-in, like a as a as a check-in 473 00:17:07,835 --> 00:17:09,730 with the staff, how they were doing, which 474 00:17:09,730 --> 00:17:11,649 just didn't seem comfortably to him at all. 475 00:17:11,649 --> 00:17:13,169 I don't think he was he wasn't the 476 00:17:13,169 --> 00:17:14,929 sort of person who did, you know, annual 477 00:17:14,929 --> 00:17:16,210 appraisals or that kind of thing. But I 478 00:17:16,210 --> 00:17:18,529 remember sitting in a room with Brian Jodson. 479 00:17:18,529 --> 00:17:19,970 I'm not quite sure he knew who he 480 00:17:19,970 --> 00:17:20,869 knew I was. 481 00:17:21,250 --> 00:17:22,784 And in fact, I used to when I 482 00:17:22,784 --> 00:17:23,605 lived in Cambridge, 483 00:17:23,904 --> 00:17:25,585 I lived in a part of Cambridge called 484 00:17:25,585 --> 00:17:27,424 Newnham, which was a really nice part on 485 00:17:27,424 --> 00:17:29,204 the southeast of the city. 486 00:17:29,664 --> 00:17:29,904 And, 487 00:17:30,704 --> 00:17:32,704 every twice a week, I think, once, twice 488 00:17:32,704 --> 00:17:33,744 a week, there used to be this fish 489 00:17:33,744 --> 00:17:35,744 and chip van would roll up. And I 490 00:17:35,744 --> 00:17:37,184 remember I used to go for a run, 491 00:17:37,184 --> 00:17:39,210 and I'd have this 5 pound note in 492 00:17:39,210 --> 00:17:41,450 my hand. And afterwards, I'd queue up to 493 00:17:41,450 --> 00:17:41,950 get 494 00:17:42,410 --> 00:17:44,650 cod and chips, whatever it was. And one 495 00:17:44,650 --> 00:17:46,650 of the people always in the queue was 496 00:17:46,650 --> 00:17:49,210 Brian Josephson. And I don't think people knew 497 00:17:49,210 --> 00:17:50,890 who he was because he was quite a 498 00:17:50,890 --> 00:17:52,269 sort of distinctive character. 499 00:17:52,694 --> 00:17:55,095 He had this curly black hair, glasses. He 500 00:17:55,095 --> 00:17:57,434 had his cycle helmet on and his 501 00:17:57,894 --> 00:18:00,214 trousers with bicycle clips. And he'd be standing 502 00:18:00,214 --> 00:18:01,815 there. And I don't think anybody knew who 503 00:18:01,815 --> 00:18:03,894 he was and I I I knew him, 504 00:18:04,134 --> 00:18:06,134 from the department. So there was a very 505 00:18:06,134 --> 00:18:06,634 ordinary, 506 00:18:07,174 --> 00:18:10,049 scene with this eminent Nobel Prize winning physicist 507 00:18:10,350 --> 00:18:10,910 going around, 508 00:18:11,710 --> 00:18:13,309 in in that department. And over the years, 509 00:18:13,309 --> 00:18:15,710 you know, he's, he's I I dare to 510 00:18:15,710 --> 00:18:16,990 say, can I call him a friend of 511 00:18:16,990 --> 00:18:18,910 physics world? He's very sort of helpful on 512 00:18:18,910 --> 00:18:20,289 various matters if he 513 00:18:20,704 --> 00:18:22,865 and he certainly reads Physics World. And, 514 00:18:23,505 --> 00:18:25,744 unfortunately, Margaret Carrias, our colleague, is not here, 515 00:18:25,744 --> 00:18:27,984 but she, received a couple of or an 516 00:18:27,984 --> 00:18:30,464 email from him about the physics of how 517 00:18:30,464 --> 00:18:32,305 to turn a mattress. And I can't remember 518 00:18:32,305 --> 00:18:33,924 the details of it, but certainly, 519 00:18:34,625 --> 00:18:35,105 it sounds 520 00:18:35,744 --> 00:18:37,259 we have to get Margaret on the podcast 521 00:18:37,259 --> 00:18:39,339 another time for her to explain that story 522 00:18:39,339 --> 00:18:41,259 about Brian Joseph and send you an email 523 00:18:41,259 --> 00:18:43,339 about, you know, the physics of the symmetry 524 00:18:43,339 --> 00:18:44,859 of turning a mattress, how to do it 525 00:18:44,859 --> 00:18:46,240 in the most efficient way, 526 00:18:46,940 --> 00:18:48,460 and how to do it, you know, quickly 527 00:18:48,539 --> 00:18:51,384 as quickly as possible. So, yeah. I've actually 528 00:18:51,384 --> 00:18:54,744 had a appraisal from Brian Josephson. How about 529 00:18:54,744 --> 00:18:56,444 that? Wow. Claims of fame. 530 00:18:56,904 --> 00:18:59,304 Can't beat that. Yeah. I've I mean, I 531 00:18:59,304 --> 00:19:02,664 have worked with with Nobel laureates. I I 532 00:19:02,664 --> 00:19:04,284 went to the Lindau meeting 533 00:19:05,130 --> 00:19:07,070 once. I think you've been to the Lindau 534 00:19:07,289 --> 00:19:10,170 meeting several times. That's a meeting on a 535 00:19:10,170 --> 00:19:11,470 beautiful lake in Germany 536 00:19:11,930 --> 00:19:12,410 where, 537 00:19:13,289 --> 00:19:15,549 Nobel Prize winners are invited, 538 00:19:15,930 --> 00:19:18,330 and they speak to, well, young people, I 539 00:19:18,330 --> 00:19:20,404 suppose, from all over the world. 540 00:19:21,025 --> 00:19:23,525 And I was very fortunate 1 year 541 00:19:23,904 --> 00:19:24,404 to, 542 00:19:24,865 --> 00:19:26,805 be asked to organize a seminar 543 00:19:27,505 --> 00:19:30,485 where, the panelists were Nobel Prize, 544 00:19:31,345 --> 00:19:31,845 winners. 545 00:19:32,305 --> 00:19:33,445 And I chose 546 00:19:34,599 --> 00:19:36,299 I chose to look at immigration 547 00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:39,339 and Nobel Prize winners because 548 00:19:40,039 --> 00:19:42,919 and I believe we have an infographic on 549 00:19:42,919 --> 00:19:45,559 Physics World to back this up. A huge 550 00:19:45,559 --> 00:19:49,079 number of of Nobel Laureates in Physics were 551 00:19:49,079 --> 00:19:49,579 immigrants 552 00:19:50,174 --> 00:19:51,795 either before or after 553 00:19:52,335 --> 00:19:54,735 they, won their prizes. You know, you you 554 00:19:54,894 --> 00:19:57,055 you've got people who fled Nazi Germany, for 555 00:19:57,055 --> 00:19:57,555 example, 556 00:19:58,095 --> 00:20:00,575 who are Nobel Prize winners or then won 557 00:20:00,575 --> 00:20:01,475 Nobel Prizes. 558 00:20:01,855 --> 00:20:03,795 Or, you know, you have people who 559 00:20:04,369 --> 00:20:07,090 who moved to different countries and did their 560 00:20:07,090 --> 00:20:08,390 Nobel Prize winning, 561 00:20:09,250 --> 00:20:10,630 work as an immigrant. 562 00:20:11,330 --> 00:20:13,970 And so it was a very timely topic 563 00:20:13,970 --> 00:20:15,490 at the time. I think it was around 564 00:20:15,490 --> 00:20:15,990 Brexit. 565 00:20:16,289 --> 00:20:18,734 Yeah. The time of the time of Brexit, 566 00:20:19,674 --> 00:20:21,835 in the UK where immigration was a very 567 00:20:21,835 --> 00:20:22,575 hot topic. 568 00:20:23,034 --> 00:20:25,595 And I really I really enjoyed that. I 569 00:20:25,595 --> 00:20:26,494 mean, there were 570 00:20:26,875 --> 00:20:28,474 you can read about it on the Physics 571 00:20:28,474 --> 00:20:29,294 World website. 572 00:20:29,994 --> 00:20:32,470 I think I had 4 Nobel Prize winners. 573 00:20:32,470 --> 00:20:35,589 I had absolutely no problem getting people to 574 00:20:35,589 --> 00:20:36,650 talk about this. 575 00:20:37,269 --> 00:20:37,930 You know, 576 00:20:38,470 --> 00:20:40,150 I think a few of the the Nobel 577 00:20:40,150 --> 00:20:42,730 Prize winners who took part were actually immigrants 578 00:20:42,789 --> 00:20:45,349 themselves. People were very keen to talk about 579 00:20:45,349 --> 00:20:48,494 it. So that was a very rewarding experience. 580 00:20:48,715 --> 00:20:51,035 I really enjoyed that. Yeah. Yeah. I remember 581 00:20:51,035 --> 00:20:52,095 there was one Nobel, 582 00:20:53,195 --> 00:20:55,515 Linzhou event. I think it was, a session 583 00:20:55,515 --> 00:20:58,559 chaired by our former colleague, Matthew Chalmers, who 584 00:20:59,120 --> 00:21:01,600 currently was, until recently, the editor of Sir 585 00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:03,600 and Courier. And I know he, did a 586 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:05,600 similar panel debate. And I remember watching it. 587 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:07,440 I think either when I was there or 588 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:09,360 I watched it online, and it was certainly 589 00:21:09,360 --> 00:21:11,920 really difficult for him because the panel had 590 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:13,734 some Nobel laureates on it, and they're they're 591 00:21:13,734 --> 00:21:15,194 kind of a law unto themselves. 592 00:21:15,575 --> 00:21:16,855 And it was I found it I don't 593 00:21:16,855 --> 00:21:18,294 know if you have this experience, Hamish. I 594 00:21:18,294 --> 00:21:20,214 think Matthew found it very hard to keep 595 00:21:20,214 --> 00:21:22,454 those laureates on track. Some of them were 596 00:21:22,454 --> 00:21:24,454 just sort of talking on stage while this 597 00:21:24,454 --> 00:21:26,214 panel debate was going to go on because 598 00:21:26,214 --> 00:21:27,720 I think they felt maybe if you're a 599 00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:29,480 Nobel Laureate, you're kind of above the law 600 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:30,839 where you can kind of do what you 601 00:21:30,839 --> 00:21:32,839 like. You're maybe sort of used to, you 602 00:21:32,839 --> 00:21:34,359 know, having everything your own way. And I 603 00:21:34,359 --> 00:21:36,440 I remember thinking it must have been a 604 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:38,279 very difficult job for him to keep them 605 00:21:38,279 --> 00:21:40,380 on track and keep them sort of respectful 606 00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:42,140 of the rules of the panel debate. But, 607 00:21:42,285 --> 00:21:44,705 you know, certainly that Nobel laureate Nobel Prize 608 00:21:44,845 --> 00:21:47,005 meeting in Lindau is very unusual. It's kind 609 00:21:47,005 --> 00:21:49,164 of like a I'm trying to analogy, I 610 00:21:49,164 --> 00:21:50,924 suppose it's a bit like a Woodstock for 611 00:21:50,924 --> 00:21:53,404 Nobel laureate. Like a music festival. And the 612 00:21:53,404 --> 00:21:55,164 reason everyone is there is to see these 613 00:21:55,164 --> 00:21:57,960 eminent artists, and the artists are the Nobel 614 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:00,359 laureates. And, they're kind of wandering around with 615 00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:00,859 sort 616 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:03,099 of, you know, students of, 617 00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:05,640 dare I say, falling students sort of attracted 618 00:22:05,640 --> 00:22:06,839 to them. And I and I had an 619 00:22:06,839 --> 00:22:08,440 experience myself, Hamish, which, 620 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:10,855 I've told you the story several times 621 00:22:11,234 --> 00:22:13,394 where I'd arranged to I was there in 622 00:22:13,555 --> 00:22:15,634 it was 2010, and I'd arranged to talk 623 00:22:15,634 --> 00:22:17,654 to Robert Laughlin who won the 1998 624 00:22:18,914 --> 00:22:21,394 Nobel Prize for Physics for his condensed matter 625 00:22:21,394 --> 00:22:22,375 work. And 626 00:22:22,759 --> 00:22:24,200 he had a new book out about the 627 00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:25,960 future of energy and coal, and I was 628 00:22:25,960 --> 00:22:27,640 there and I'd arranged to have a talk 629 00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:29,080 to him in a in a private room 630 00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:29,980 to do an interview. 631 00:22:30,360 --> 00:22:32,200 And after about 20 minutes, all was going 632 00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:34,360 quite well, but then, someone barged in. 1 633 00:22:34,360 --> 00:22:36,279 of the conference officials barged in. You know, 634 00:22:36,279 --> 00:22:38,335 there'd been an overbooking and, you know, we 635 00:22:38,335 --> 00:22:39,615 were turfed out. And the fact that I 636 00:22:39,615 --> 00:22:41,375 was with a Nobel Laureate didn't sort of 637 00:22:41,375 --> 00:22:44,515 make any difference. We had to reconvene. So 638 00:22:45,134 --> 00:22:47,055 this interview kind of got cut short and 639 00:22:47,055 --> 00:22:49,055 then we reconvened on the terrace because, as 640 00:22:49,055 --> 00:22:50,835 you remember, Hamish, it's on the lovely 641 00:22:51,215 --> 00:22:54,420 banks of the Lake Constance, and it's beautiful 642 00:22:54,420 --> 00:22:56,099 with lakes and the mountains in the distance, 643 00:22:56,099 --> 00:22:58,579 and, it's a lovely setting. And so we 644 00:22:58,579 --> 00:23:00,819 reconvene on this outside table. But like I 645 00:23:00,819 --> 00:23:01,559 said before, 646 00:23:02,179 --> 00:23:04,500 this whole event, the Nobel laureates, everyone knows 647 00:23:04,500 --> 00:23:06,505 who they are. And before I knew what 648 00:23:06,505 --> 00:23:07,244 was going on, 649 00:23:07,625 --> 00:23:09,704 kinda one student had joined with us, and 650 00:23:09,704 --> 00:23:11,305 then there was another student, and then a 651 00:23:11,305 --> 00:23:13,464 third and a fourth. And before I knew 652 00:23:13,464 --> 00:23:14,904 what was going on, this one to one 653 00:23:14,904 --> 00:23:16,525 interview that was meant to be in private 654 00:23:16,825 --> 00:23:18,345 had just turned into a kind of press 655 00:23:18,345 --> 00:23:18,779 conference 656 00:23:19,740 --> 00:23:21,980 where Robert Loughlin was holding court with all 657 00:23:21,980 --> 00:23:23,580 these students, and they 658 00:23:24,140 --> 00:23:25,660 the whole thing was rather awkward, and I 659 00:23:25,660 --> 00:23:27,980 ended up sort of sidling into the background 660 00:23:27,980 --> 00:23:30,140 while he held forth, held court with all 661 00:23:30,140 --> 00:23:31,420 these students. You know, he was in his 662 00:23:31,420 --> 00:23:32,025 element. And, 663 00:23:32,744 --> 00:23:34,424 you know, they get invited to this meeting, 664 00:23:34,424 --> 00:23:36,025 and they're really the stars of the show. 665 00:23:36,025 --> 00:23:37,705 And that that of course, they are. And, 666 00:23:37,865 --> 00:23:40,025 the students obviously want to sort of brush 667 00:23:40,025 --> 00:23:41,945 up with this genius and sort of actually 668 00:23:41,945 --> 00:23:43,805 feel see 1 in the flesh. And it's 669 00:23:43,945 --> 00:23:45,865 it's quite an unusual experience because the Nobel 670 00:23:45,865 --> 00:23:48,450 laureates really are celebrities. And I don't know. 671 00:23:48,450 --> 00:23:50,690 Your life really must get turned upside down 672 00:23:50,690 --> 00:23:52,869 when you you win one of these prizes. 673 00:23:53,329 --> 00:23:55,509 It's quite an incredible thing. It's the one 674 00:23:55,890 --> 00:23:57,109 one feat that, 675 00:23:57,410 --> 00:23:58,930 you know, you can win in physics that 676 00:23:58,930 --> 00:24:00,630 really does transform your life. 677 00:24:01,134 --> 00:24:03,634 Yeah. Well, what what's it? It's called Nobelitis, 678 00:24:04,015 --> 00:24:05,134 isn't it? Where, 679 00:24:05,694 --> 00:24:06,335 you know, you 680 00:24:07,855 --> 00:24:10,095 a laureate sort of gets swept away by 681 00:24:10,095 --> 00:24:10,755 the fame 682 00:24:11,134 --> 00:24:15,049 and, maybe starts commenting on on areas of 683 00:24:15,049 --> 00:24:17,930 of life and society and science that they 684 00:24:17,930 --> 00:24:19,849 they don't really know much about. I mean, 685 00:24:19,849 --> 00:24:21,769 I have to say, I have never met, 686 00:24:22,089 --> 00:24:23,869 a Nobel laureate who suffered 687 00:24:24,170 --> 00:24:24,910 from noblitis. 688 00:24:25,289 --> 00:24:26,109 All of them 689 00:24:26,695 --> 00:24:29,815 were very grounded and lovely people to chat 690 00:24:29,815 --> 00:24:31,595 to and very unassuming. 691 00:24:32,134 --> 00:24:34,615 So I think I think noblitis is probably 692 00:24:34,615 --> 00:24:35,755 a fairly rare 693 00:24:36,055 --> 00:24:36,555 affliction. 694 00:24:37,335 --> 00:24:37,835 So, 695 00:24:38,710 --> 00:24:40,789 well, I I mean, I I could go 696 00:24:40,789 --> 00:24:41,529 on forever 697 00:24:42,309 --> 00:24:45,350 about Nobel Prize winners that, that I've met 698 00:24:45,350 --> 00:24:46,170 and interviewed. 699 00:24:46,870 --> 00:24:49,110 But what what about you, Matin? Any, would 700 00:24:49,110 --> 00:24:50,384 you would you like to take the last 701 00:24:50,384 --> 00:24:52,464 slot of the podcast? Well, I suppose the 702 00:24:52,464 --> 00:24:54,545 most difficult one that I had to do 703 00:24:54,545 --> 00:24:56,565 was Steven Weinberg. I remember 704 00:24:57,025 --> 00:24:59,505 it was 2003, and I've been invited to 705 00:24:59,505 --> 00:25:00,005 CERN 706 00:25:00,464 --> 00:25:00,785 to, 707 00:25:01,265 --> 00:25:03,345 see how plans were developing for the the 708 00:25:03,345 --> 00:25:05,765 Large Hadron Collider, which was then being built. 709 00:25:06,329 --> 00:25:08,569 And I think Steven Weinberg was there, been 710 00:25:08,569 --> 00:25:10,009 invited to give a talk. And in the 711 00:25:10,009 --> 00:25:12,730 break in the schedule, he'd arranged to talk 712 00:25:12,730 --> 00:25:13,309 to me 713 00:25:13,609 --> 00:25:14,970 as a member of the press. And so 714 00:25:14,970 --> 00:25:17,470 we met in a hotel lobby in Geneva 715 00:25:17,609 --> 00:25:20,569 and started doing this interview. And, you know, 716 00:25:20,569 --> 00:25:22,384 he was very lovely person, as you say, 717 00:25:22,384 --> 00:25:25,204 Nobel laureates. But honestly, I felt 718 00:25:25,825 --> 00:25:27,825 so so out of my depth, you know, 719 00:25:27,825 --> 00:25:29,264 out of all the people you might meet, 720 00:25:29,264 --> 00:25:30,804 this was a theorist who, 721 00:25:31,345 --> 00:25:33,365 you know, sort of several orders of magnitude 722 00:25:33,504 --> 00:25:35,369 more intelligent, you know, and it was an 723 00:25:35,369 --> 00:25:36,970 incredible job to sort of reign him in. 724 00:25:36,970 --> 00:25:38,650 He was very charming and kind, but it 725 00:25:38,650 --> 00:25:40,250 was sort of it's a very sort of 726 00:25:40,250 --> 00:25:42,890 asymmetric process when you interview Nobel laureate because 727 00:25:42,890 --> 00:25:44,590 they they know so much and 728 00:25:45,049 --> 00:25:47,130 and and you feel even your questions that 729 00:25:47,130 --> 00:25:47,789 you ask 730 00:25:48,250 --> 00:25:50,945 aren't even sensible. You know, it's just very 731 00:25:50,945 --> 00:25:52,805 odd because they know so much, and 732 00:25:53,265 --> 00:25:55,025 and it's and it can be quite, it's 733 00:25:55,025 --> 00:25:56,785 quite difficult because you're, a, you're trying to 734 00:25:56,785 --> 00:25:58,884 sort of keep abreast of what they're telling 735 00:25:59,345 --> 00:26:01,045 you in real time. They're deluging 736 00:26:01,424 --> 00:26:03,664 deluging you with information that, you know, they've 737 00:26:03,664 --> 00:26:05,445 been thinking about for 50 years. 738 00:26:05,809 --> 00:26:07,169 And then you're trying to sort of think 739 00:26:07,169 --> 00:26:08,230 up your next question, 740 00:26:08,769 --> 00:26:10,869 without looking too stupid. And, 741 00:26:12,130 --> 00:26:14,369 sadly, the Dictaphone that I recorded the meeting 742 00:26:14,369 --> 00:26:16,630 on, we didn't have sort of mobile devices 743 00:26:16,769 --> 00:26:17,775 as we do now, digital devices, 744 00:26:18,654 --> 00:26:20,894 an old fashioned analog tape. I'm not quite 745 00:26:20,894 --> 00:26:22,335 sure where it is, and we kinda lost 746 00:26:22,335 --> 00:26:23,855 it in one of our many moves of 747 00:26:23,855 --> 00:26:25,934 physics world over the years. But the only 748 00:26:25,934 --> 00:26:27,695 thing I can remember, Hamish, was that, you 749 00:26:27,695 --> 00:26:29,394 know, he we were sitting there and suddenly, 750 00:26:29,535 --> 00:26:31,934 he broke off midstream and sort of led 751 00:26:31,934 --> 00:26:33,535 forward onto the table in front of us. 752 00:26:33,535 --> 00:26:35,109 And there was a bowl of peanuts and 753 00:26:35,109 --> 00:26:37,269 started eating these peanuts. And then he started 754 00:26:37,269 --> 00:26:39,269 asking me whether I like peanuts, and it 755 00:26:39,269 --> 00:26:40,549 was really odd. The only thing I can 756 00:26:40,549 --> 00:26:41,990 remember is, isn't it stupid? Are all these 757 00:26:41,990 --> 00:26:43,309 things he was telling me? The only thing 758 00:26:43,309 --> 00:26:45,589 I can remember is, do you like nuts 759 00:26:45,589 --> 00:26:46,789 is what he said to me. And in 760 00:26:46,789 --> 00:26:48,194 my family at home, it's kind of this 761 00:26:48,194 --> 00:26:50,914 catchphrase. Do you like nuts has become sort 762 00:26:50,914 --> 00:26:52,194 of gone down in history. And isn't it 763 00:26:52,194 --> 00:26:53,634 silly? Like, of all the things that he 764 00:26:53,634 --> 00:26:55,015 told me, the only thing I can remember 765 00:26:55,234 --> 00:26:57,654 is Steven Weinberg asking whether I like peanuts. 766 00:26:58,515 --> 00:26:59,474 But, you know, he was, 767 00:27:00,049 --> 00:27:00,369 you know, obviously, 768 00:27:01,169 --> 00:27:03,409 very talented person and, you know, fully deserving 769 00:27:03,409 --> 00:27:04,470 of the prize. And, 770 00:27:05,089 --> 00:27:06,609 you know, so let's see who wins this 771 00:27:06,609 --> 00:27:08,690 year. I'm sure whoever it is Hamish, their 772 00:27:08,690 --> 00:27:11,169 lives will be turned upside down and be, 773 00:27:11,169 --> 00:27:12,710 you know, transformed. And 774 00:27:13,544 --> 00:27:16,105 even in 2018, when Donna Strickland, the Canadian 775 00:27:16,184 --> 00:27:18,504 your Canadian compatriot won the Nobel Prize Who 776 00:27:18,504 --> 00:27:21,004 who, is a graduate of McMaster University 777 00:27:21,384 --> 00:27:24,204 on the website and the 2nd Nobel Laureate 778 00:27:24,424 --> 00:27:26,679 associated? It. Absolutely lovely person. And and I 779 00:27:26,679 --> 00:27:29,000 know her life has been sort of transformed, 780 00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:30,539 and you kind of need a whole 781 00:27:30,919 --> 00:27:32,919 entourage of people to sort of run your 782 00:27:32,919 --> 00:27:34,859 schedule because you're suddenly in demand. 783 00:27:36,519 --> 00:27:38,279 So let's see who win wins the prize 784 00:27:38,279 --> 00:27:39,019 this year. 785 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:41,365 Remind me what were your suggestions again. You 786 00:27:41,365 --> 00:27:42,744 think Capaso and Henry, 787 00:27:43,125 --> 00:27:45,525 Lena Howe? Henry, Lena Howe. And I went 788 00:27:45,525 --> 00:27:47,285 for twisted Graphene. So, 789 00:27:47,845 --> 00:27:50,085 let's see who wins next week. Yeah. I 790 00:27:50,085 --> 00:27:51,845 mean, I really hope it's somebody that we 791 00:27:51,845 --> 00:27:52,345 know, 792 00:27:52,740 --> 00:27:54,740 you know, a friend of physics world. Wouldn't 793 00:27:54,740 --> 00:27:57,000 that be great if, you know, somebody 794 00:27:57,299 --> 00:28:00,599 we know wins? But we have absolutely no 795 00:28:00,819 --> 00:28:01,319 insight 796 00:28:01,779 --> 00:28:04,420 into who's going to win next week. So, 797 00:28:05,044 --> 00:28:07,284 may the best physicist win. Well, as we 798 00:28:07,284 --> 00:28:09,125 always say, you know, it takes 50 years 799 00:28:09,125 --> 00:28:11,544 before the archives are opened up. And so 800 00:28:12,164 --> 00:28:13,944 we will have to wait until 2074, 801 00:28:14,565 --> 00:28:16,164 which I don't think would be around then, 802 00:28:16,164 --> 00:28:18,644 Hamish, to find out the reasons why the 803 00:28:18,644 --> 00:28:20,900 prize was awarded this year. They're very careful 804 00:28:20,900 --> 00:28:22,980 not to sort of release details until that 805 00:28:22,980 --> 00:28:25,539 50 year rule has passed. So but we 806 00:28:25,539 --> 00:28:27,480 will certainly find out on Tuesday, 807 00:28:28,819 --> 00:28:32,440 8th October I believe so. 2024 at 10:45 808 00:28:33,460 --> 00:28:35,694 UK time. UK time. And let's hope there's 809 00:28:35,694 --> 00:28:37,294 not an embarrassing thing like there was with 810 00:28:37,294 --> 00:28:39,615 the chemistry prize last year where, Oh, was 811 00:28:39,615 --> 00:28:41,694 it leaked? It was leaked, wasn't it? That 812 00:28:41,694 --> 00:28:43,794 that was a first, I think. Yeah. Yeah. 813 00:28:44,254 --> 00:28:45,154 Very exciting. 814 00:28:45,534 --> 00:28:48,414 But, yeah, stay tuned to Physics World, on 815 00:28:48,414 --> 00:28:49,634 8th October. 816 00:28:50,000 --> 00:28:52,480 We'll have, we'll have an article out within 817 00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:52,980 minutes. 818 00:28:53,519 --> 00:28:54,820 That's our, tradition. 819 00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:57,680 So you can find out out all about 820 00:28:57,680 --> 00:29:00,180 the Nobel Laureate or Laureate, 821 00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:01,460 for 2024 822 00:29:02,174 --> 00:29:03,315 at Physics World. 823 00:29:03,855 --> 00:29:05,875 Okay. Thanks, Matin. Thanks, Hamish. 824 00:29:12,894 --> 00:29:14,654 I'm afraid that's all the time we have 825 00:29:14,654 --> 00:29:15,875 for this week's podcast. 826 00:29:16,190 --> 00:29:17,490 Thanks again to Matin 827 00:29:17,869 --> 00:29:18,609 and also 828 00:29:18,910 --> 00:29:21,089 to Fred Iles, our producer. 829 00:29:21,470 --> 00:29:23,809 This episode was supported by SmartAct, 830 00:29:24,349 --> 00:29:27,170 empowering breakthroughs in science and technology 831 00:29:27,710 --> 00:29:29,490 with high precision positioning, 832 00:29:30,029 --> 00:29:30,529 metrology, 833 00:29:31,184 --> 00:29:31,924 and automation 834 00:29:32,304 --> 00:29:32,804 solutions. 835 00:29:33,424 --> 00:29:33,924 Visit 836 00:29:34,304 --> 00:29:34,804 smartact.com 837 00:29:36,304 --> 00:29:37,284 to learn more.