Nobel predictions and humorous encounters with physics laureates

Physics World Weekly Podcast

In this episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast, our very own Matin Durrani and Hamish Johnston explain why they think that this year’s Nobel Prize for Physics could be awarded for work in condensed-matter physics – and who could be in the running. They also reminisce about some of the many Nobel laureates that they have met over the years and the excitement that comes every October when the winners are announced.

 

SmarAct proudly supports Physics World‘s Nobel Prize coverage, advancing breakthroughs in science and technology through high-precision positioning, metrology and automation. Discover how SmarAct shapes the future of innovation at smaract.com.

2024-10-03 30 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

1
00:00:07,839 --> 00:00:10,800
Hello, and welcome to the Physics World Weekly

2
00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:11,300
podcast.

3
00:00:11,759 --> 00:00:14,855
I'm Hamish Johnston, and I'm joined today by

4
00:00:14,855 --> 00:00:15,595
my colleague,

5
00:00:15,974 --> 00:00:18,074
Matin Durrani. Hi, Matin.

6
00:00:18,774 --> 00:00:21,015
Hello, Hamish. How are you doing? Yeah. I'm

7
00:00:21,015 --> 00:00:23,515
not too bad and I'm getting very excited

8
00:00:23,814 --> 00:00:25,515
because, of course, next week,

9
00:00:26,500 --> 00:00:29,140
the Nobel Prize in Physics is going to

10
00:00:29,140 --> 00:00:31,620
be awarded. And so, the in this podcast,

11
00:00:31,620 --> 00:00:33,780
we're gonna have a little chat about the

12
00:00:33,780 --> 00:00:36,679
Nobel Prize. We're gonna put through some predictions,

13
00:00:36,899 --> 00:00:39,320
which, of course, we will get completely wrong.

14
00:00:39,545 --> 00:00:40,844
And, we'll also talk

15
00:00:41,304 --> 00:00:44,265
about Nobel Prize winners that we've met in

16
00:00:44,265 --> 00:00:47,145
the past. But first, this episode is brought

17
00:00:47,145 --> 00:00:48,284
to you by SmartAct.

18
00:00:48,984 --> 00:00:51,244
Elevating high precision positioning,

19
00:00:51,704 --> 00:00:52,204
metrology

20
00:00:52,825 --> 00:00:53,645
and automation

21
00:00:54,189 --> 00:00:55,890
to empower your breakthroughs.

22
00:00:56,590 --> 00:00:58,369
Shape the future with

23
00:00:59,070 --> 00:00:59,570
technologies.

24
00:01:07,594 --> 00:01:09,995
So, Matin, first, I thought we'd, we'd go

25
00:01:09,995 --> 00:01:11,375
through some of our predictions

26
00:01:12,075 --> 00:01:15,194
for, next week's Nobel Prize. And and shall

27
00:01:15,194 --> 00:01:17,194
I start off? Well, I mean, you've over

28
00:01:17,194 --> 00:01:18,875
the last few years, we've got this amazing

29
00:01:18,875 --> 00:01:19,375
infographic

30
00:01:19,834 --> 00:01:20,075
that,

31
00:01:20,635 --> 00:01:22,474
contains a list of all down the one

32
00:01:22,474 --> 00:01:24,500
side, it's the list of subject areas that

33
00:01:24,500 --> 00:01:26,500
the prize has been awarded to. And it's

34
00:01:26,500 --> 00:01:28,739
a graphic that kind of maps, year by

35
00:01:28,739 --> 00:01:31,219
year, different areas. So you've been, looking at

36
00:01:31,219 --> 00:01:32,900
that for quite a few years, and it

37
00:01:32,900 --> 00:01:35,780
seems like there's one field that is ripe

38
00:01:35,780 --> 00:01:38,325
for being awarded this year. Yeah. That's right.

39
00:01:38,325 --> 00:01:40,325
I mean, listeners, this is a bit of

40
00:01:40,325 --> 00:01:40,825
numerology.

41
00:01:41,525 --> 00:01:42,025
Basically,

42
00:01:42,484 --> 00:01:43,685
you know, I sort of look at the

43
00:01:43,685 --> 00:01:44,745
numbers, and

44
00:01:45,125 --> 00:01:46,424
I try to decide,

45
00:01:47,204 --> 00:01:51,444
the gaps in years between Nobel Prizes being

46
00:01:51,444 --> 00:01:51,944
awarded

47
00:01:52,439 --> 00:01:53,659
in specific fields.

48
00:01:53,959 --> 00:01:57,479
And according to my, chart, which, you can

49
00:01:57,479 --> 00:02:00,280
see, on the Physics World website, there seems

50
00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:02,679
to be about a 5 year gap on

51
00:02:02,679 --> 00:02:03,179
average

52
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,615
between different disciplines. So you remember, Matin, that

53
00:02:06,615 --> 00:02:09,735
last year, we managed to predict 2 out

54
00:02:09,735 --> 00:02:10,794
of 3 winners

55
00:02:11,175 --> 00:02:13,354
by focusing on those gaps.

56
00:02:14,055 --> 00:02:15,915
There hadn't been a winner in atomic,

57
00:02:16,294 --> 00:02:18,314
molecular, and optical physics

58
00:02:18,629 --> 00:02:19,129
since

59
00:02:19,469 --> 00:02:19,969
2018.

60
00:02:20,310 --> 00:02:22,729
So we predicted that Paul Corkum,

61
00:02:23,030 --> 00:02:25,449
Ferenc Krauss, and Anne Flouillier

62
00:02:25,990 --> 00:02:29,209
would win for their work involving ultra short

63
00:02:29,430 --> 00:02:30,409
laser pulses.

64
00:02:30,814 --> 00:02:34,014
And sure enough, we were right. Well, sort

65
00:02:34,014 --> 00:02:36,034
of right. Krauss and Louwelier

66
00:02:36,414 --> 00:02:38,194
were the winners in 2023.

67
00:02:38,814 --> 00:02:39,634
And unfortunately,

68
00:02:40,334 --> 00:02:42,194
fellow Canadian, Paul Corkum,

69
00:02:42,495 --> 00:02:43,634
was passed over.

70
00:02:44,250 --> 00:02:46,969
Now this year, I'm focusing on the 7

71
00:02:46,969 --> 00:02:50,009
year gap since the last prize was given

72
00:02:50,009 --> 00:02:51,709
for condensed matter physics.

73
00:02:52,009 --> 00:02:53,789
And I think that this field

74
00:02:54,090 --> 00:02:57,224
might just be the award winning one this

75
00:02:57,224 --> 00:02:57,724
year.

76
00:02:58,264 --> 00:03:01,004
But before we talk about some potential condensed

77
00:03:01,064 --> 00:03:01,965
matter winners,

78
00:03:02,264 --> 00:03:04,125
I'm going to go out on a limb

79
00:03:04,264 --> 00:03:06,504
and suggest that it might be 2 years

80
00:03:06,504 --> 00:03:09,004
in a row for atomic, molecular,

81
00:03:09,305 --> 00:03:10,685
and optical physics.

82
00:03:11,030 --> 00:03:14,170
So my first prediction is that Lina Howe

83
00:03:14,389 --> 00:03:15,290
of the Massachusetts

84
00:03:15,750 --> 00:03:16,969
Institute of Technology

85
00:03:17,430 --> 00:03:20,170
is going to win this year's Nobel Prize

86
00:03:20,230 --> 00:03:22,250
for her work on slow light.

87
00:03:22,629 --> 00:03:24,710
This is a a trick, well, it's not

88
00:03:24,710 --> 00:03:26,170
really a trick, it's physics,

89
00:03:26,525 --> 00:03:29,405
Where you can fire light into a gas,

90
00:03:29,405 --> 00:03:30,705
an atomic gas.

91
00:03:31,004 --> 00:03:33,104
And you can slow it right down.

92
00:03:33,645 --> 00:03:35,724
And then you you make a change to

93
00:03:35,724 --> 00:03:38,044
that gas. And you can speed it up

94
00:03:38,044 --> 00:03:40,525
again. So it's almost like you can store

95
00:03:40,525 --> 00:03:42,860
light in a gas. And, you know, that's

96
00:03:42,860 --> 00:03:45,340
an amazing thing. And I think there's some

97
00:03:45,340 --> 00:03:48,860
amazing physics in that. So Lina Hao, that's

98
00:03:48,860 --> 00:03:50,780
my first pick. Because she's she's been on

99
00:03:50,780 --> 00:03:52,620
quite a few of these prediction lists. I

100
00:03:52,620 --> 00:03:54,379
mean, I'm looking back even 10 years ago,

101
00:03:54,379 --> 00:03:55,520
she was on lists,

102
00:03:55,844 --> 00:03:58,084
particularly as a, you know, an outstanding female

103
00:03:58,084 --> 00:04:00,185
researcher and one person who should win.

104
00:04:00,724 --> 00:04:02,084
But, yeah, she's on the list been on

105
00:04:02,084 --> 00:04:03,844
the list for quite a while. It wouldn't

106
00:04:03,844 --> 00:04:04,805
surprise me, but,

107
00:04:05,364 --> 00:04:07,604
over the years, Hamish, I've I've nothing surprises

108
00:04:07,604 --> 00:04:09,349
me about who wins the prize. It's quite

109
00:04:09,349 --> 00:04:11,189
hard to predict, isn't it? You know, some

110
00:04:11,189 --> 00:04:13,430
are nailed so it's only rarely is it

111
00:04:13,430 --> 00:04:15,349
a nailed uncertainty. And I think the Higgs

112
00:04:15,349 --> 00:04:18,230
boson was the 1 year in 2013 that

113
00:04:18,230 --> 00:04:19,669
you were pretty sure that was the one

114
00:04:19,669 --> 00:04:21,430
that was gonna win it. We almost got

115
00:04:21,430 --> 00:04:23,205
it right last year. We picked 2 out

116
00:04:23,205 --> 00:04:25,125
of the 3 winners. But, yeah, it is

117
00:04:25,125 --> 00:04:25,865
very difficult.

118
00:04:26,324 --> 00:04:28,645
And and so, condensed matter, that's my my

119
00:04:28,645 --> 00:04:31,305
next field that I think might be in

120
00:04:31,685 --> 00:04:32,165
for,

121
00:04:32,884 --> 00:04:35,080
for a Nobel Prize. And and this one

122
00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:36,920
is is a slight cheat. I mean, I

123
00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:38,060
think both of these

124
00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:42,139
physicists are, strictly speaking, are condensed matter physicists.

125
00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:45,160
But they tend to work in the field

126
00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:45,980
of optics.

127
00:04:46,595 --> 00:04:47,634
And those are,

128
00:04:48,035 --> 00:04:50,935
John Pendry of Imperial College London

129
00:04:51,394 --> 00:04:52,294
and Federico

130
00:04:52,915 --> 00:04:53,415
Capasso

131
00:04:53,794 --> 00:04:56,134
of Harvard University in the US.

132
00:04:56,435 --> 00:04:57,574
Now John Pendry,

133
00:04:58,194 --> 00:04:59,175
is a pioneer

134
00:04:59,555 --> 00:05:03,490
of the mathematics that describe how metamaterials

135
00:05:04,430 --> 00:05:04,930
manipulate

136
00:05:05,389 --> 00:05:05,889
light

137
00:05:06,189 --> 00:05:07,649
and other electromagnetic

138
00:05:07,949 --> 00:05:08,449
radiation.

139
00:05:08,829 --> 00:05:10,430
And, you know, he's come up with some

140
00:05:10,430 --> 00:05:12,769
some great ideas, like, for an invisibility

141
00:05:13,069 --> 00:05:13,569
cloak,

142
00:05:13,955 --> 00:05:15,895
manipulating light so that something

143
00:05:16,514 --> 00:05:18,915
disappears. And, you know, people sort of pooh

144
00:05:18,915 --> 00:05:20,514
poohed that when he first came out with

145
00:05:20,514 --> 00:05:23,235
the idea. But, you know, these have been

146
00:05:23,235 --> 00:05:23,735
built,

147
00:05:24,275 --> 00:05:24,775
particularly,

148
00:05:25,395 --> 00:05:26,615
operating from microwaves.

149
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,060
So he was a mathematical

150
00:05:29,439 --> 00:05:30,979
pioneer in that field.

151
00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:32,259
And Federico

152
00:05:32,639 --> 00:05:33,139
Capasso

153
00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,060
has actually built

154
00:05:35,439 --> 00:05:36,419
lots of metamaterials

155
00:05:37,199 --> 00:05:40,019
that do some amazing things with light.

156
00:05:40,464 --> 00:05:42,725
You know, for example, making flat lenses,

157
00:05:43,105 --> 00:05:46,644
which are really, really useful for modern technology

158
00:05:47,264 --> 00:05:48,004
such as

159
00:05:49,264 --> 00:05:51,345
mobile phones. Because, of course, you want you

160
00:05:51,345 --> 00:05:52,564
want a really high quality

161
00:05:53,024 --> 00:05:55,685
optical system in a mobile phone. And normally,

162
00:05:55,745 --> 00:05:56,040
that

163
00:05:56,759 --> 00:06:00,040
requires a certain thickness. But Capaso and his

164
00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:02,360
team have come up with ways of making

165
00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,779
very, very thin lenses using metamaterials.

166
00:06:05,319 --> 00:06:08,060
And they're actually commercializing it as well.

167
00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:09,399
So, yeah, I think,

168
00:06:10,045 --> 00:06:13,564
Capaso and Pendry double bill is another one.

169
00:06:13,884 --> 00:06:15,824
So what about Umatine? Have you,

170
00:06:16,205 --> 00:06:17,725
who who do you think might win this

171
00:06:17,725 --> 00:06:19,964
year? Well, I think Capaso and Pendry is

172
00:06:19,964 --> 00:06:21,404
a very good shout, Hamish. I mean, they've

173
00:06:21,404 --> 00:06:22,764
been on our list for quite a while.

174
00:06:22,764 --> 00:06:24,525
And I I know Capaso is still doing

175
00:06:24,525 --> 00:06:25,199
amazing work.

176
00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:28,420
We we see papers that he's still, publishing.

177
00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:29,759
You know, I'm not quite sure how old

178
00:06:29,759 --> 00:06:31,520
he is, but he's, you know, very, very

179
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,300
active still. So that's a good shout.

180
00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:36,720
The other topic that we thought Hamish that

181
00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:39,120
was quite likely might win is, you know,

182
00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:40,580
this whole area of twisted

183
00:06:40,964 --> 00:06:42,725
Oh, yeah. That's a good one for condensed

184
00:06:42,725 --> 00:06:44,485
matter as well. So that is condensed matter.

185
00:06:44,485 --> 00:06:45,845
So that's the idea. You have these very

186
00:06:45,845 --> 00:06:47,145
thin carbon sheets,

187
00:06:47,524 --> 00:06:49,605
but you you have 2 layers, but they're

188
00:06:49,605 --> 00:06:51,925
misaligned in terms of their molecular structure by

189
00:06:51,925 --> 00:06:52,824
a certain angle.

190
00:06:53,444 --> 00:06:55,670
And, that was one of our breakthroughs of

191
00:06:55,670 --> 00:06:57,689
the year. And I think was it 2018?

192
00:06:58,069 --> 00:07:00,230
You basically got this new platform for exploring

193
00:07:00,230 --> 00:07:02,470
all sorts of exciting condensed matter physics.

194
00:07:03,270 --> 00:07:05,430
And the person who led that work was

195
00:07:05,430 --> 00:07:09,430
also MIT, and that's, Pablo Gerilo Herrero. Hope

196
00:07:09,430 --> 00:07:10,365
I've got his name right,

197
00:07:11,404 --> 00:07:13,245
who has sort of stacked these sheets together

198
00:07:13,245 --> 00:07:14,365
and done a lot of the great work

199
00:07:14,365 --> 00:07:16,204
in that area. So that's,

200
00:07:16,764 --> 00:07:19,324
if that wins, that's quite unusual because that's

201
00:07:19,324 --> 00:07:22,044
quite recent work. And it's not always that

202
00:07:22,044 --> 00:07:23,849
the Nobel Prize goes to work that's done

203
00:07:23,849 --> 00:07:25,449
in the last couple of years, but you

204
00:07:25,449 --> 00:07:26,729
never know that could be in with a

205
00:07:26,729 --> 00:07:29,529
shout. But I know from, your chats that

206
00:07:29,529 --> 00:07:31,209
you've had with the people who award the

207
00:07:31,209 --> 00:07:32,729
prizes, you know, we know that they do

208
00:07:32,729 --> 00:07:35,069
it very rigorously, and often prizes get nominated,

209
00:07:36,810 --> 00:07:38,889
numerous times. And I think that plays a

210
00:07:38,889 --> 00:07:41,104
a role in which prizes get awarded. And

211
00:07:41,104 --> 00:07:41,604
sometimes,

212
00:07:42,225 --> 00:07:43,745
you know, people like Peter Higgs had to

213
00:07:43,745 --> 00:07:46,144
wait sort of 50 years before, his prize

214
00:07:46,144 --> 00:07:48,164
from the work he originally did. So

215
00:07:48,865 --> 00:07:50,625
that might be in with a shout, perhaps

216
00:07:50,625 --> 00:07:52,464
less of a shout because it's quite recent

217
00:07:52,464 --> 00:07:55,910
only because of that. But certainly twisted Graphene

218
00:07:55,910 --> 00:07:57,910
is, yeah, one area to keep an eye

219
00:07:57,910 --> 00:07:59,930
on. Well, that's enough about the future, Hamish.

220
00:07:59,990 --> 00:08:01,430
Over the years, me and you and the

221
00:08:01,430 --> 00:08:02,870
rest of the physics world team have met

222
00:08:02,870 --> 00:08:04,970
all sorts of Nobel Prize winning physicists.

223
00:08:06,150 --> 00:08:07,595
So you've got a story up your sleeve

224
00:08:07,595 --> 00:08:08,894
about about Bert

225
00:08:09,194 --> 00:08:11,694
Brockhouse. Do you wanna remind people who

226
00:08:12,074 --> 00:08:14,735
Bert Brockhouse was? He's a Canadian, wasn't he?

227
00:08:14,875 --> 00:08:17,295
Yeah. That's right. So so Bert Brockhouse,

228
00:08:17,834 --> 00:08:20,095
I think was the first Nobel Laureate

229
00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,479
that I ever met, and this was years

230
00:08:22,479 --> 00:08:22,979
before

231
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,139
I joined Physics World.

232
00:08:25,439 --> 00:08:27,360
And, you know, in in the run up

233
00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:29,220
to every Nobel Prize, actually,

234
00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:32,000
I think I I think back to that

235
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:33,394
day. It was in 1994.

236
00:08:34,334 --> 00:08:36,674
And, I had just woken up in Hamilton,

237
00:08:36,815 --> 00:08:39,954
Ontario, which is sort of a, an industrial

238
00:08:40,014 --> 00:08:40,514
city,

239
00:08:41,294 --> 00:08:44,735
just outside of Toronto. And the CBC News

240
00:08:44,735 --> 00:08:45,475
came on.

241
00:08:45,870 --> 00:08:48,509
And the announcement was that Bert Brakhos had

242
00:08:48,509 --> 00:08:50,529
just won the Nobel Prize for Physics.

243
00:08:50,990 --> 00:08:52,509
And at the time, I was doing a

244
00:08:52,509 --> 00:08:56,429
PhD at McMaster University. And Brakhos was a

245
00:08:56,429 --> 00:08:57,570
professor emeritus

246
00:08:58,105 --> 00:08:58,845
at McMaster.

247
00:08:59,384 --> 00:09:01,384
And so there was an instant connection. And

248
00:09:01,384 --> 00:09:03,225
I was very excited because, you know, I

249
00:09:03,225 --> 00:09:04,745
was I was about to go into the

250
00:09:04,745 --> 00:09:06,745
physics department. And I knew that,

251
00:09:07,225 --> 00:09:09,965
you know, that there would be joyous mayhem

252
00:09:10,105 --> 00:09:11,980
when I got there. But I also had

253
00:09:11,980 --> 00:09:13,539
a bit of a a bit more of

254
00:09:13,539 --> 00:09:14,759
a personal connection,

255
00:09:15,299 --> 00:09:17,379
I would say. Because a few years earlier,

256
00:09:17,379 --> 00:09:18,279
I had spent

257
00:09:18,659 --> 00:09:19,480
some time,

258
00:09:20,100 --> 00:09:21,480
at the Chalk River,

259
00:09:22,019 --> 00:09:22,519
laboratories,

260
00:09:23,379 --> 00:09:24,839
sort of a national laboratory

261
00:09:25,220 --> 00:09:25,959
in Canada

262
00:09:26,475 --> 00:09:29,115
in the neutron is it the neutron physics

263
00:09:29,115 --> 00:09:31,914
branch or the neutron science branch? I can't

264
00:09:31,914 --> 00:09:34,394
quite remember the name. But that branch was

265
00:09:34,394 --> 00:09:34,894
founded

266
00:09:35,355 --> 00:09:37,774
by Bert Brockhouse. And he won

267
00:09:38,075 --> 00:09:39,375
the, 1994

268
00:09:39,754 --> 00:09:41,855
Nobel Prize for his work on,

269
00:09:42,449 --> 00:09:45,589
inelastic neutron scattering. So he was a pioneer

270
00:09:45,730 --> 00:09:48,949
in using neutrons to study the dynamics

271
00:09:49,730 --> 00:09:52,709
of solid materials, essentially bouncing neutrons

272
00:09:53,169 --> 00:09:53,829
off atoms

273
00:09:54,209 --> 00:09:56,629
and working out their vibrational modes.

274
00:09:56,995 --> 00:09:59,335
That's what, that's what Brakhos did.

275
00:10:00,035 --> 00:10:02,195
And that was a fantastic day. Yet,

276
00:10:02,675 --> 00:10:04,455
I remember going into the university,

277
00:10:05,554 --> 00:10:08,195
and the physics department. And just as I

278
00:10:08,195 --> 00:10:09,014
came in,

279
00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:11,460
Jules Carbot, who is,

280
00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:15,620
unfortunately, he's since passed away, but a theoretical

281
00:10:15,759 --> 00:10:17,539
physicist who studied superconductivity

282
00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:20,339
came skipping down the hall.

283
00:10:20,639 --> 00:10:23,039
And, as I passed him, he punched the

284
00:10:23,039 --> 00:10:25,345
air And he said, Bert Brackhaus,

285
00:10:25,725 --> 00:10:26,784
son of a gun.

286
00:10:27,965 --> 00:10:29,884
And this this is my this is my

287
00:10:29,884 --> 00:10:32,764
memory of walking into the physics department. And

288
00:10:32,764 --> 00:10:35,345
people were really, really happy about it. Brackhaus

289
00:10:35,404 --> 00:10:36,240
was the first,

290
00:10:36,879 --> 00:10:38,339
Nobel Prize winner

291
00:10:38,799 --> 00:10:39,299
associated

292
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:42,559
with McMaster University in Amatine. You've been to

293
00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:45,120
the University of Bristol and Cambridge, which, you

294
00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:48,000
know, has no no shortage of of Nobel

295
00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:49,700
laureates. But this was the first

296
00:10:50,254 --> 00:10:50,754
McMaster,

297
00:10:51,615 --> 00:10:54,894
Nobel laureate. So everybody was very happy. And

298
00:10:54,894 --> 00:10:56,434
there were endless celebrations.

299
00:10:57,054 --> 00:10:57,375
And,

300
00:10:58,014 --> 00:11:00,355
it was very nice. I remember meeting Brockhouse

301
00:11:00,414 --> 00:11:01,075
and discovering

302
00:11:01,534 --> 00:11:03,215
that he lived in this in one of

303
00:11:03,215 --> 00:11:05,909
my favorite areas of Hamilton, this sort of

304
00:11:06,149 --> 00:11:08,089
semi rural neighborhood,

305
00:11:08,789 --> 00:11:10,789
on the Niagara Escarpment. So he had a

306
00:11:10,789 --> 00:11:11,929
chat about that.

307
00:11:12,470 --> 00:11:12,970
And,

308
00:11:13,589 --> 00:11:15,829
yeah, it was a it was a lovely

309
00:11:15,909 --> 00:11:18,565
it was a really lovely day. And so

310
00:11:18,565 --> 00:11:19,464
every October,

311
00:11:20,004 --> 00:11:22,084
I think back to that day. And, you

312
00:11:22,084 --> 00:11:23,705
know, I've got some nice thoughts

313
00:11:24,964 --> 00:11:28,084
about that. So, yeah, that's, I I've written,

314
00:11:28,325 --> 00:11:30,840
something about that for the for the website.

315
00:11:31,460 --> 00:11:32,820
So I'll have a look at that. So

316
00:11:32,820 --> 00:11:35,799
what about you, Matin? You've had, some encounters

317
00:11:35,860 --> 00:11:38,500
with Nobel Prize winners as well. Well, I

318
00:11:38,500 --> 00:11:40,019
had an incident a bit like yours. It

319
00:11:40,019 --> 00:11:42,179
was early 9 I think 91, actually, when

320
00:11:42,179 --> 00:11:44,419
I was at the, Cavendish Laboratory, which was

321
00:11:44,419 --> 00:11:47,004
the department of physics at Cambridge. And the

322
00:11:47,004 --> 00:11:48,845
work I was involved in was in soft

323
00:11:48,845 --> 00:11:50,764
matter physics. And that was the year when

324
00:11:50,764 --> 00:11:53,745
Pierre Gilles de Jean, the the, Frenchman,

325
00:11:54,045 --> 00:11:55,884
won the Nobel Prize that year. And I

326
00:11:55,884 --> 00:11:56,384
remember,

327
00:11:57,004 --> 00:11:59,585
you know, there was great, celebration. He wasn't

328
00:11:59,809 --> 00:12:02,129
at the Cavendish Laboratory, but the Cavendish had

329
00:12:02,129 --> 00:12:04,209
a real expertise in soft matter physics. And

330
00:12:04,209 --> 00:12:06,129
there was a real delight that this field

331
00:12:06,129 --> 00:12:07,970
of physics that perhaps had gone under the

332
00:12:07,970 --> 00:12:10,529
radar was being recognized by the award of

333
00:12:10,529 --> 00:12:12,449
a prize. And I remember that year, you

334
00:12:12,449 --> 00:12:12,945
know,

335
00:12:13,345 --> 00:12:14,965
de Gein had done a lot of work

336
00:12:15,105 --> 00:12:17,184
with Sam Edwards at Cambridge, and he didn't

337
00:12:17,184 --> 00:12:18,544
win the prize that year. But there was

338
00:12:18,544 --> 00:12:20,565
no hard feelings. It was just a feeling

339
00:12:20,865 --> 00:12:21,445
that really,

340
00:12:22,625 --> 00:12:24,625
glad that that field had been recognized by

341
00:12:24,625 --> 00:12:26,865
the Nobel committee. But I think, actually, correct

342
00:12:26,865 --> 00:12:28,065
me if I'm wrong, Hamish, I think that

343
00:12:28,065 --> 00:12:28,799
was the last

344
00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:31,600
time that only one person won the Nobel

345
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,879
Prize for Physics Oh, it could be. Yeah.

346
00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,959
Now it's very much routinely shared with people.

347
00:12:36,959 --> 00:12:37,459
And,

348
00:12:37,839 --> 00:12:40,100
you know, that was, you know, an unusual

349
00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:42,240
time, because it just went to him. And

350
00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:44,154
that that's very much it's 2 or 3

351
00:12:44,154 --> 00:12:45,695
people share it routinely.

352
00:12:46,154 --> 00:12:48,075
Normally, it is. Yeah. It's funny. You've just

353
00:12:48,154 --> 00:12:49,295
you've mentioned Degen,

354
00:12:49,675 --> 00:12:52,495
and a memory of Degen has come back

355
00:12:52,555 --> 00:12:54,815
into my mind. And it was at McMaster,

356
00:12:55,940 --> 00:12:57,700
when I was doing my p h PhD

357
00:12:57,700 --> 00:12:58,440
at McMaster.

358
00:12:58,899 --> 00:13:00,120
DeJenne was,

359
00:13:01,220 --> 00:13:01,720
invited,

360
00:13:02,500 --> 00:13:04,200
to the university to speak.

361
00:13:04,580 --> 00:13:06,919
And he gave a seminar

362
00:13:07,220 --> 00:13:08,039
for undergraduate

363
00:13:08,514 --> 00:13:10,355
students. This was after he'd won the Nobel

364
00:13:10,355 --> 00:13:11,894
Prize, so he was very famous.

365
00:13:12,274 --> 00:13:14,934
And he gave a a seminar for undergraduate

366
00:13:15,235 --> 00:13:18,195
students. But he was so desperate for a

367
00:13:18,195 --> 00:13:18,695
cigarette.

368
00:13:19,475 --> 00:13:21,095
And back in those days,

369
00:13:21,519 --> 00:13:23,360
you know, McMaster was a was a you

370
00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:26,980
couldn't smoke inside in 91 at McMaster University.

371
00:13:27,519 --> 00:13:28,259
And so

372
00:13:28,639 --> 00:13:29,139
the

373
00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:32,320
the seminar was held outside. It was a

374
00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:33,379
beautiful day.

375
00:13:33,945 --> 00:13:36,764
And, it was held outside under a tree.

376
00:13:36,904 --> 00:13:39,465
And there was DeJene standing there smoking a

377
00:13:39,465 --> 00:13:39,965
cigarette

378
00:13:40,585 --> 00:13:42,045
with Really? Undergraduates

379
00:13:42,425 --> 00:13:44,105
gathered. He was a very heavy smoker. Gathered

380
00:13:44,105 --> 00:13:47,660
around him. Yeah. So it's yeah. I, yeah.

381
00:13:47,660 --> 00:13:49,279
That that one's just popped.

382
00:13:49,740 --> 00:13:51,680
That one's just popped into my head.

383
00:13:52,300 --> 00:13:54,220
Yeah. I mean, it's funny, you know, thinking

384
00:13:54,220 --> 00:13:56,139
about, you know, we're I think we're so

385
00:13:56,139 --> 00:13:58,540
privileged, if I can say that, at Physics

386
00:13:58,540 --> 00:14:00,879
World that we do get to meet

387
00:14:01,235 --> 00:14:01,894
these people.

388
00:14:02,434 --> 00:14:02,754
And,

389
00:14:03,554 --> 00:14:05,794
another Nobel Prize winner that I I really

390
00:14:05,794 --> 00:14:06,294
enjoyed

391
00:14:07,315 --> 00:14:09,414
meeting and interviewing is Frank Wilczak,

392
00:14:10,595 --> 00:14:11,334
the American,

393
00:14:12,195 --> 00:14:15,634
theoretical physicist who won for his work, on

394
00:14:15,634 --> 00:14:16,695
the strong force.

395
00:14:17,370 --> 00:14:19,370
But the the the interesting thing about that

396
00:14:19,370 --> 00:14:19,870
encounter

397
00:14:20,170 --> 00:14:20,910
is that,

398
00:14:21,850 --> 00:14:23,470
I interviewed him at,

399
00:14:25,210 --> 00:14:26,190
the March meeting,

400
00:14:26,809 --> 00:14:29,370
of the American Physical Society. And it was

401
00:14:29,370 --> 00:14:30,110
an anniversary.

402
00:14:30,649 --> 00:14:33,235
I think it was in some important anniversary

403
00:14:33,934 --> 00:14:37,075
of the, discovery of high temperature superconductivity.

404
00:14:38,495 --> 00:14:40,595
And so we talked about superconductivity.

405
00:14:41,535 --> 00:14:44,095
And that's what Frank Wilczek was really interested

406
00:14:44,095 --> 00:14:45,715
in at the time.

407
00:14:46,149 --> 00:14:47,990
You know, he had, he'd done his work

408
00:14:47,990 --> 00:14:50,230
on the strong force. And now he was

409
00:14:50,230 --> 00:14:51,370
talking about superconductivity

410
00:14:52,389 --> 00:14:54,570
and how the mathematics of superconductivity

411
00:14:55,110 --> 00:14:57,049
can be used to understand other,

412
00:14:57,830 --> 00:14:58,970
aspects of physics.

413
00:14:59,509 --> 00:15:01,110
And, you know, he's he's done some great

414
00:15:01,110 --> 00:15:02,704
work on time crystals, hasn't he?

415
00:15:03,485 --> 00:15:04,924
Yeah. Correct me if I'm wrong, Hamish. I

416
00:15:04,924 --> 00:15:06,384
think it was actually the 2011

417
00:15:07,084 --> 00:15:09,504
meeting, which was the centenary of the discovery

418
00:15:09,804 --> 00:15:10,544
of superconductivity.

419
00:15:11,004 --> 00:15:12,944
But obviously Okay. That included,

420
00:15:13,565 --> 00:15:15,324
but not to include high temperature work as

421
00:15:15,324 --> 00:15:18,009
well. It it was actually it was 2011,

422
00:15:18,009 --> 00:15:19,389
Mateen. Yeah. You're right.

423
00:15:20,009 --> 00:15:21,690
And but but the thing is, I I

424
00:15:21,690 --> 00:15:22,750
was really chuffed,

425
00:15:23,690 --> 00:15:25,450
with Frank, if I can call him that.

426
00:15:25,450 --> 00:15:25,950
Because

427
00:15:26,490 --> 00:15:28,970
4 years later, I was at the Royal

428
00:15:28,970 --> 00:15:30,269
Society in London.

429
00:15:30,615 --> 00:15:32,875
And I was there for a meeting about,

430
00:15:33,894 --> 00:15:35,914
Maxwell and Maxwell's equations.

431
00:15:36,774 --> 00:15:37,274
And,

432
00:15:38,254 --> 00:15:40,235
it we you know, in the coffee break,

433
00:15:40,294 --> 00:15:42,294
we were everybody there was looking at the

434
00:15:42,294 --> 00:15:43,894
portraits. I don't know if you've ever been

435
00:15:43,894 --> 00:15:44,960
to the Royal Society.

436
00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:46,800
It's full of portraits

437
00:15:47,259 --> 00:15:49,980
of all the famous, you know, fellows down

438
00:15:49,980 --> 00:15:51,980
the down the ages. So, you know, you've

439
00:15:51,980 --> 00:15:53,200
got Benjamin Franklin

440
00:15:53,580 --> 00:15:56,399
and Faraday and, you know, all these people.

441
00:15:57,034 --> 00:15:57,434
And,

442
00:15:58,394 --> 00:16:00,554
there's there's one portrait that had a sort

443
00:16:00,554 --> 00:16:01,454
of a saucy

444
00:16:02,154 --> 00:16:03,934
caption with with some innuendo.

445
00:16:04,714 --> 00:16:07,375
And, you know, I remember sort of chuckling,

446
00:16:07,995 --> 00:16:10,554
about it with Frank Wilczek. And he looked

447
00:16:10,554 --> 00:16:13,250
at me. And he said, oh, I know

448
00:16:13,250 --> 00:16:15,409
you. We've met somewhere, haven't we? So you

449
00:16:15,409 --> 00:16:17,329
actually knew a Nobel laureate knew you, actually.

450
00:16:17,329 --> 00:16:20,710
A Nobel laureate actually knew me. Yes. So

451
00:16:21,009 --> 00:16:22,230
that's, yeah.

452
00:16:23,250 --> 00:16:26,074
Another claim to fame with, with Nobel laureate.

453
00:16:26,074 --> 00:16:27,194
Well, I can do one better than that,

454
00:16:27,194 --> 00:16:28,954
Hamish. Because actually, when I was at the,

455
00:16:29,274 --> 00:16:31,834
Cavendish Laboratory in the early nineties, I did

456
00:16:31,834 --> 00:16:33,674
my PhD then. I actually went on to

457
00:16:33,674 --> 00:16:35,115
do a post doc. And one of the

458
00:16:35,115 --> 00:16:39,034
people in the department was Brian Josephson, who

459
00:16:39,034 --> 00:16:39,534
is,

460
00:16:40,110 --> 00:16:41,950
you know, famously won the Nobel Prize in

461
00:16:41,950 --> 00:16:42,450
1973.

462
00:16:42,909 --> 00:16:45,230
He was very young, 33. In fact, he

463
00:16:45,230 --> 00:16:47,889
won it for work on, you know, superconductivity

464
00:16:48,269 --> 00:16:50,269
and quantum tunneling that he'd done much earlier

465
00:16:50,269 --> 00:16:51,889
when he was in early twenties.

466
00:16:52,269 --> 00:16:54,049
And when I was there in the department,

467
00:16:54,190 --> 00:16:56,654
he was just a regular member of staff.

468
00:16:57,914 --> 00:17:00,154
And I think he was assigned to me

469
00:17:00,154 --> 00:17:01,274
to do a kind of,

470
00:17:01,995 --> 00:17:03,274
like a sort of what do you call

471
00:17:03,274 --> 00:17:05,055
it? I'm not like a management,

472
00:17:05,674 --> 00:17:07,835
check-in, like a as a as a check-in

473
00:17:07,835 --> 00:17:09,730
with the staff, how they were doing, which

474
00:17:09,730 --> 00:17:11,649
just didn't seem comfortably to him at all.

475
00:17:11,649 --> 00:17:13,169
I don't think he was he wasn't the

476
00:17:13,169 --> 00:17:14,929
sort of person who did, you know, annual

477
00:17:14,929 --> 00:17:16,210
appraisals or that kind of thing. But I

478
00:17:16,210 --> 00:17:18,529
remember sitting in a room with Brian Jodson.

479
00:17:18,529 --> 00:17:19,970
I'm not quite sure he knew who he

480
00:17:19,970 --> 00:17:20,869
knew I was.

481
00:17:21,250 --> 00:17:22,784
And in fact, I used to when I

482
00:17:22,784 --> 00:17:23,605
lived in Cambridge,

483
00:17:23,904 --> 00:17:25,585
I lived in a part of Cambridge called

484
00:17:25,585 --> 00:17:27,424
Newnham, which was a really nice part on

485
00:17:27,424 --> 00:17:29,204
the southeast of the city.

486
00:17:29,664 --> 00:17:29,904
And,

487
00:17:30,704 --> 00:17:32,704
every twice a week, I think, once, twice

488
00:17:32,704 --> 00:17:33,744
a week, there used to be this fish

489
00:17:33,744 --> 00:17:35,744
and chip van would roll up. And I

490
00:17:35,744 --> 00:17:37,184
remember I used to go for a run,

491
00:17:37,184 --> 00:17:39,210
and I'd have this 5 pound note in

492
00:17:39,210 --> 00:17:41,450
my hand. And afterwards, I'd queue up to

493
00:17:41,450 --> 00:17:41,950
get

494
00:17:42,410 --> 00:17:44,650
cod and chips, whatever it was. And one

495
00:17:44,650 --> 00:17:46,650
of the people always in the queue was

496
00:17:46,650 --> 00:17:49,210
Brian Josephson. And I don't think people knew

497
00:17:49,210 --> 00:17:50,890
who he was because he was quite a

498
00:17:50,890 --> 00:17:52,269
sort of distinctive character.

499
00:17:52,694 --> 00:17:55,095
He had this curly black hair, glasses. He

500
00:17:55,095 --> 00:17:57,434
had his cycle helmet on and his

501
00:17:57,894 --> 00:18:00,214
trousers with bicycle clips. And he'd be standing

502
00:18:00,214 --> 00:18:01,815
there. And I don't think anybody knew who

503
00:18:01,815 --> 00:18:03,894
he was and I I I knew him,

504
00:18:04,134 --> 00:18:06,134
from the department. So there was a very

505
00:18:06,134 --> 00:18:06,634
ordinary,

506
00:18:07,174 --> 00:18:10,049
scene with this eminent Nobel Prize winning physicist

507
00:18:10,350 --> 00:18:10,910
going around,

508
00:18:11,710 --> 00:18:13,309
in in that department. And over the years,

509
00:18:13,309 --> 00:18:15,710
you know, he's, he's I I dare to

510
00:18:15,710 --> 00:18:16,990
say, can I call him a friend of

511
00:18:16,990 --> 00:18:18,910
physics world? He's very sort of helpful on

512
00:18:18,910 --> 00:18:20,289
various matters if he

513
00:18:20,704 --> 00:18:22,865
and he certainly reads Physics World. And,

514
00:18:23,505 --> 00:18:25,744
unfortunately, Margaret Carrias, our colleague, is not here,

515
00:18:25,744 --> 00:18:27,984
but she, received a couple of or an

516
00:18:27,984 --> 00:18:30,464
email from him about the physics of how

517
00:18:30,464 --> 00:18:32,305
to turn a mattress. And I can't remember

518
00:18:32,305 --> 00:18:33,924
the details of it, but certainly,

519
00:18:34,625 --> 00:18:35,105
it sounds

520
00:18:35,744 --> 00:18:37,259
we have to get Margaret on the podcast

521
00:18:37,259 --> 00:18:39,339
another time for her to explain that story

522
00:18:39,339 --> 00:18:41,259
about Brian Joseph and send you an email

523
00:18:41,259 --> 00:18:43,339
about, you know, the physics of the symmetry

524
00:18:43,339 --> 00:18:44,859
of turning a mattress, how to do it

525
00:18:44,859 --> 00:18:46,240
in the most efficient way,

526
00:18:46,940 --> 00:18:48,460
and how to do it, you know, quickly

527
00:18:48,539 --> 00:18:51,384
as quickly as possible. So, yeah. I've actually

528
00:18:51,384 --> 00:18:54,744
had a appraisal from Brian Josephson. How about

529
00:18:54,744 --> 00:18:56,444
that? Wow. Claims of fame.

530
00:18:56,904 --> 00:18:59,304
Can't beat that. Yeah. I've I mean, I

531
00:18:59,304 --> 00:19:02,664
have worked with with Nobel laureates. I I

532
00:19:02,664 --> 00:19:04,284
went to the Lindau meeting

533
00:19:05,130 --> 00:19:07,070
once. I think you've been to the Lindau

534
00:19:07,289 --> 00:19:10,170
meeting several times. That's a meeting on a

535
00:19:10,170 --> 00:19:11,470
beautiful lake in Germany

536
00:19:11,930 --> 00:19:12,410
where,

537
00:19:13,289 --> 00:19:15,549
Nobel Prize winners are invited,

538
00:19:15,930 --> 00:19:18,330
and they speak to, well, young people, I

539
00:19:18,330 --> 00:19:20,404
suppose, from all over the world.

540
00:19:21,025 --> 00:19:23,525
And I was very fortunate 1 year

541
00:19:23,904 --> 00:19:24,404
to,

542
00:19:24,865 --> 00:19:26,805
be asked to organize a seminar

543
00:19:27,505 --> 00:19:30,485
where, the panelists were Nobel Prize,

544
00:19:31,345 --> 00:19:31,845
winners.

545
00:19:32,305 --> 00:19:33,445
And I chose

546
00:19:34,599 --> 00:19:36,299
I chose to look at immigration

547
00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:39,339
and Nobel Prize winners because

548
00:19:40,039 --> 00:19:42,919
and I believe we have an infographic on

549
00:19:42,919 --> 00:19:45,559
Physics World to back this up. A huge

550
00:19:45,559 --> 00:19:49,079
number of of Nobel Laureates in Physics were

551
00:19:49,079 --> 00:19:49,579
immigrants

552
00:19:50,174 --> 00:19:51,795
either before or after

553
00:19:52,335 --> 00:19:54,735
they, won their prizes. You know, you you

554
00:19:54,894 --> 00:19:57,055
you've got people who fled Nazi Germany, for

555
00:19:57,055 --> 00:19:57,555
example,

556
00:19:58,095 --> 00:20:00,575
who are Nobel Prize winners or then won

557
00:20:00,575 --> 00:20:01,475
Nobel Prizes.

558
00:20:01,855 --> 00:20:03,795
Or, you know, you have people who

559
00:20:04,369 --> 00:20:07,090
who moved to different countries and did their

560
00:20:07,090 --> 00:20:08,390
Nobel Prize winning,

561
00:20:09,250 --> 00:20:10,630
work as an immigrant.

562
00:20:11,330 --> 00:20:13,970
And so it was a very timely topic

563
00:20:13,970 --> 00:20:15,490
at the time. I think it was around

564
00:20:15,490 --> 00:20:15,990
Brexit.

565
00:20:16,289 --> 00:20:18,734
Yeah. The time of the time of Brexit,

566
00:20:19,674 --> 00:20:21,835
in the UK where immigration was a very

567
00:20:21,835 --> 00:20:22,575
hot topic.

568
00:20:23,034 --> 00:20:25,595
And I really I really enjoyed that. I

569
00:20:25,595 --> 00:20:26,494
mean, there were

570
00:20:26,875 --> 00:20:28,474
you can read about it on the Physics

571
00:20:28,474 --> 00:20:29,294
World website.

572
00:20:29,994 --> 00:20:32,470
I think I had 4 Nobel Prize winners.

573
00:20:32,470 --> 00:20:35,589
I had absolutely no problem getting people to

574
00:20:35,589 --> 00:20:36,650
talk about this.

575
00:20:37,269 --> 00:20:37,930
You know,

576
00:20:38,470 --> 00:20:40,150
I think a few of the the Nobel

577
00:20:40,150 --> 00:20:42,730
Prize winners who took part were actually immigrants

578
00:20:42,789 --> 00:20:45,349
themselves. People were very keen to talk about

579
00:20:45,349 --> 00:20:48,494
it. So that was a very rewarding experience.

580
00:20:48,715 --> 00:20:51,035
I really enjoyed that. Yeah. Yeah. I remember

581
00:20:51,035 --> 00:20:52,095
there was one Nobel,

582
00:20:53,195 --> 00:20:55,515
Linzhou event. I think it was, a session

583
00:20:55,515 --> 00:20:58,559
chaired by our former colleague, Matthew Chalmers, who

584
00:20:59,120 --> 00:21:01,600
currently was, until recently, the editor of Sir

585
00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:03,600
and Courier. And I know he, did a

586
00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:05,600
similar panel debate. And I remember watching it.

587
00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:07,440
I think either when I was there or

588
00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:09,360
I watched it online, and it was certainly

589
00:21:09,360 --> 00:21:11,920
really difficult for him because the panel had

590
00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:13,734
some Nobel laureates on it, and they're they're

591
00:21:13,734 --> 00:21:15,194
kind of a law unto themselves.

592
00:21:15,575 --> 00:21:16,855
And it was I found it I don't

593
00:21:16,855 --> 00:21:18,294
know if you have this experience, Hamish. I

594
00:21:18,294 --> 00:21:20,214
think Matthew found it very hard to keep

595
00:21:20,214 --> 00:21:22,454
those laureates on track. Some of them were

596
00:21:22,454 --> 00:21:24,454
just sort of talking on stage while this

597
00:21:24,454 --> 00:21:26,214
panel debate was going to go on because

598
00:21:26,214 --> 00:21:27,720
I think they felt maybe if you're a

599
00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:29,480
Nobel Laureate, you're kind of above the law

600
00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:30,839
where you can kind of do what you

601
00:21:30,839 --> 00:21:32,839
like. You're maybe sort of used to, you

602
00:21:32,839 --> 00:21:34,359
know, having everything your own way. And I

603
00:21:34,359 --> 00:21:36,440
I remember thinking it must have been a

604
00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:38,279
very difficult job for him to keep them

605
00:21:38,279 --> 00:21:40,380
on track and keep them sort of respectful

606
00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:42,140
of the rules of the panel debate. But,

607
00:21:42,285 --> 00:21:44,705
you know, certainly that Nobel laureate Nobel Prize

608
00:21:44,845 --> 00:21:47,005
meeting in Lindau is very unusual. It's kind

609
00:21:47,005 --> 00:21:49,164
of like a I'm trying to analogy, I

610
00:21:49,164 --> 00:21:50,924
suppose it's a bit like a Woodstock for

611
00:21:50,924 --> 00:21:53,404
Nobel laureate. Like a music festival. And the

612
00:21:53,404 --> 00:21:55,164
reason everyone is there is to see these

613
00:21:55,164 --> 00:21:57,960
eminent artists, and the artists are the Nobel

614
00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:00,359
laureates. And, they're kind of wandering around with

615
00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:00,859
sort

616
00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:03,099
of, you know, students of,

617
00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:05,640
dare I say, falling students sort of attracted

618
00:22:05,640 --> 00:22:06,839
to them. And I and I had an

619
00:22:06,839 --> 00:22:08,440
experience myself, Hamish, which,

620
00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:10,855
I've told you the story several times

621
00:22:11,234 --> 00:22:13,394
where I'd arranged to I was there in

622
00:22:13,555 --> 00:22:15,634
it was 2010, and I'd arranged to talk

623
00:22:15,634 --> 00:22:17,654
to Robert Laughlin who won the 1998

624
00:22:18,914 --> 00:22:21,394
Nobel Prize for Physics for his condensed matter

625
00:22:21,394 --> 00:22:22,375
work. And

626
00:22:22,759 --> 00:22:24,200
he had a new book out about the

627
00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:25,960
future of energy and coal, and I was

628
00:22:25,960 --> 00:22:27,640
there and I'd arranged to have a talk

629
00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:29,080
to him in a in a private room

630
00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:29,980
to do an interview.

631
00:22:30,360 --> 00:22:32,200
And after about 20 minutes, all was going

632
00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:34,360
quite well, but then, someone barged in. 1

633
00:22:34,360 --> 00:22:36,279
of the conference officials barged in. You know,

634
00:22:36,279 --> 00:22:38,335
there'd been an overbooking and, you know, we

635
00:22:38,335 --> 00:22:39,615
were turfed out. And the fact that I

636
00:22:39,615 --> 00:22:41,375
was with a Nobel Laureate didn't sort of

637
00:22:41,375 --> 00:22:44,515
make any difference. We had to reconvene. So

638
00:22:45,134 --> 00:22:47,055
this interview kind of got cut short and

639
00:22:47,055 --> 00:22:49,055
then we reconvened on the terrace because, as

640
00:22:49,055 --> 00:22:50,835
you remember, Hamish, it's on the lovely

641
00:22:51,215 --> 00:22:54,420
banks of the Lake Constance, and it's beautiful

642
00:22:54,420 --> 00:22:56,099
with lakes and the mountains in the distance,

643
00:22:56,099 --> 00:22:58,579
and, it's a lovely setting. And so we

644
00:22:58,579 --> 00:23:00,819
reconvene on this outside table. But like I

645
00:23:00,819 --> 00:23:01,559
said before,

646
00:23:02,179 --> 00:23:04,500
this whole event, the Nobel laureates, everyone knows

647
00:23:04,500 --> 00:23:06,505
who they are. And before I knew what

648
00:23:06,505 --> 00:23:07,244
was going on,

649
00:23:07,625 --> 00:23:09,704
kinda one student had joined with us, and

650
00:23:09,704 --> 00:23:11,305
then there was another student, and then a

651
00:23:11,305 --> 00:23:13,464
third and a fourth. And before I knew

652
00:23:13,464 --> 00:23:14,904
what was going on, this one to one

653
00:23:14,904 --> 00:23:16,525
interview that was meant to be in private

654
00:23:16,825 --> 00:23:18,345
had just turned into a kind of press

655
00:23:18,345 --> 00:23:18,779
conference

656
00:23:19,740 --> 00:23:21,980
where Robert Loughlin was holding court with all

657
00:23:21,980 --> 00:23:23,580
these students, and they

658
00:23:24,140 --> 00:23:25,660
the whole thing was rather awkward, and I

659
00:23:25,660 --> 00:23:27,980
ended up sort of sidling into the background

660
00:23:27,980 --> 00:23:30,140
while he held forth, held court with all

661
00:23:30,140 --> 00:23:31,420
these students. You know, he was in his

662
00:23:31,420 --> 00:23:32,025
element. And,

663
00:23:32,744 --> 00:23:34,424
you know, they get invited to this meeting,

664
00:23:34,424 --> 00:23:36,025
and they're really the stars of the show.

665
00:23:36,025 --> 00:23:37,705
And that that of course, they are. And,

666
00:23:37,865 --> 00:23:40,025
the students obviously want to sort of brush

667
00:23:40,025 --> 00:23:41,945
up with this genius and sort of actually

668
00:23:41,945 --> 00:23:43,805
feel see 1 in the flesh. And it's

669
00:23:43,945 --> 00:23:45,865
it's quite an unusual experience because the Nobel

670
00:23:45,865 --> 00:23:48,450
laureates really are celebrities. And I don't know.

671
00:23:48,450 --> 00:23:50,690
Your life really must get turned upside down

672
00:23:50,690 --> 00:23:52,869
when you you win one of these prizes.

673
00:23:53,329 --> 00:23:55,509
It's quite an incredible thing. It's the one

674
00:23:55,890 --> 00:23:57,109
one feat that,

675
00:23:57,410 --> 00:23:58,930
you know, you can win in physics that

676
00:23:58,930 --> 00:24:00,630
really does transform your life.

677
00:24:01,134 --> 00:24:03,634
Yeah. Well, what what's it? It's called Nobelitis,

678
00:24:04,015 --> 00:24:05,134
isn't it? Where,

679
00:24:05,694 --> 00:24:06,335
you know, you

680
00:24:07,855 --> 00:24:10,095
a laureate sort of gets swept away by

681
00:24:10,095 --> 00:24:10,755
the fame

682
00:24:11,134 --> 00:24:15,049
and, maybe starts commenting on on areas of

683
00:24:15,049 --> 00:24:17,930
of life and society and science that they

684
00:24:17,930 --> 00:24:19,849
they don't really know much about. I mean,

685
00:24:19,849 --> 00:24:21,769
I have to say, I have never met,

686
00:24:22,089 --> 00:24:23,869
a Nobel laureate who suffered

687
00:24:24,170 --> 00:24:24,910
from noblitis.

688
00:24:25,289 --> 00:24:26,109
All of them

689
00:24:26,695 --> 00:24:29,815
were very grounded and lovely people to chat

690
00:24:29,815 --> 00:24:31,595
to and very unassuming.

691
00:24:32,134 --> 00:24:34,615
So I think I think noblitis is probably

692
00:24:34,615 --> 00:24:35,755
a fairly rare

693
00:24:36,055 --> 00:24:36,555
affliction.

694
00:24:37,335 --> 00:24:37,835
So,

695
00:24:38,710 --> 00:24:40,789
well, I I mean, I I could go

696
00:24:40,789 --> 00:24:41,529
on forever

697
00:24:42,309 --> 00:24:45,350
about Nobel Prize winners that, that I've met

698
00:24:45,350 --> 00:24:46,170
and interviewed.

699
00:24:46,870 --> 00:24:49,110
But what what about you, Matin? Any, would

700
00:24:49,110 --> 00:24:50,384
you would you like to take the last

701
00:24:50,384 --> 00:24:52,464
slot of the podcast? Well, I suppose the

702
00:24:52,464 --> 00:24:54,545
most difficult one that I had to do

703
00:24:54,545 --> 00:24:56,565
was Steven Weinberg. I remember

704
00:24:57,025 --> 00:24:59,505
it was 2003, and I've been invited to

705
00:24:59,505 --> 00:25:00,005
CERN

706
00:25:00,464 --> 00:25:00,785
to,

707
00:25:01,265 --> 00:25:03,345
see how plans were developing for the the

708
00:25:03,345 --> 00:25:05,765
Large Hadron Collider, which was then being built.

709
00:25:06,329 --> 00:25:08,569
And I think Steven Weinberg was there, been

710
00:25:08,569 --> 00:25:10,009
invited to give a talk. And in the

711
00:25:10,009 --> 00:25:12,730
break in the schedule, he'd arranged to talk

712
00:25:12,730 --> 00:25:13,309
to me

713
00:25:13,609 --> 00:25:14,970
as a member of the press. And so

714
00:25:14,970 --> 00:25:17,470
we met in a hotel lobby in Geneva

715
00:25:17,609 --> 00:25:20,569
and started doing this interview. And, you know,

716
00:25:20,569 --> 00:25:22,384
he was very lovely person, as you say,

717
00:25:22,384 --> 00:25:25,204
Nobel laureates. But honestly, I felt

718
00:25:25,825 --> 00:25:27,825
so so out of my depth, you know,

719
00:25:27,825 --> 00:25:29,264
out of all the people you might meet,

720
00:25:29,264 --> 00:25:30,804
this was a theorist who,

721
00:25:31,345 --> 00:25:33,365
you know, sort of several orders of magnitude

722
00:25:33,504 --> 00:25:35,369
more intelligent, you know, and it was an

723
00:25:35,369 --> 00:25:36,970
incredible job to sort of reign him in.

724
00:25:36,970 --> 00:25:38,650
He was very charming and kind, but it

725
00:25:38,650 --> 00:25:40,250
was sort of it's a very sort of

726
00:25:40,250 --> 00:25:42,890
asymmetric process when you interview Nobel laureate because

727
00:25:42,890 --> 00:25:44,590
they they know so much and

728
00:25:45,049 --> 00:25:47,130
and and you feel even your questions that

729
00:25:47,130 --> 00:25:47,789
you ask

730
00:25:48,250 --> 00:25:50,945
aren't even sensible. You know, it's just very

731
00:25:50,945 --> 00:25:52,805
odd because they know so much, and

732
00:25:53,265 --> 00:25:55,025
and it's and it can be quite, it's

733
00:25:55,025 --> 00:25:56,785
quite difficult because you're, a, you're trying to

734
00:25:56,785 --> 00:25:58,884
sort of keep abreast of what they're telling

735
00:25:59,345 --> 00:26:01,045
you in real time. They're deluging

736
00:26:01,424 --> 00:26:03,664
deluging you with information that, you know, they've

737
00:26:03,664 --> 00:26:05,445
been thinking about for 50 years.

738
00:26:05,809 --> 00:26:07,169
And then you're trying to sort of think

739
00:26:07,169 --> 00:26:08,230
up your next question,

740
00:26:08,769 --> 00:26:10,869
without looking too stupid. And,

741
00:26:12,130 --> 00:26:14,369
sadly, the Dictaphone that I recorded the meeting

742
00:26:14,369 --> 00:26:16,630
on, we didn't have sort of mobile devices

743
00:26:16,769 --> 00:26:17,775
as we do now, digital devices,

744
00:26:18,654 --> 00:26:20,894
an old fashioned analog tape. I'm not quite

745
00:26:20,894 --> 00:26:22,335
sure where it is, and we kinda lost

746
00:26:22,335 --> 00:26:23,855
it in one of our many moves of

747
00:26:23,855 --> 00:26:25,934
physics world over the years. But the only

748
00:26:25,934 --> 00:26:27,695
thing I can remember, Hamish, was that, you

749
00:26:27,695 --> 00:26:29,394
know, he we were sitting there and suddenly,

750
00:26:29,535 --> 00:26:31,934
he broke off midstream and sort of led

751
00:26:31,934 --> 00:26:33,535
forward onto the table in front of us.

752
00:26:33,535 --> 00:26:35,109
And there was a bowl of peanuts and

753
00:26:35,109 --> 00:26:37,269
started eating these peanuts. And then he started

754
00:26:37,269 --> 00:26:39,269
asking me whether I like peanuts, and it

755
00:26:39,269 --> 00:26:40,549
was really odd. The only thing I can

756
00:26:40,549 --> 00:26:41,990
remember is, isn't it stupid? Are all these

757
00:26:41,990 --> 00:26:43,309
things he was telling me? The only thing

758
00:26:43,309 --> 00:26:45,589
I can remember is, do you like nuts

759
00:26:45,589 --> 00:26:46,789
is what he said to me. And in

760
00:26:46,789 --> 00:26:48,194
my family at home, it's kind of this

761
00:26:48,194 --> 00:26:50,914
catchphrase. Do you like nuts has become sort

762
00:26:50,914 --> 00:26:52,194
of gone down in history. And isn't it

763
00:26:52,194 --> 00:26:53,634
silly? Like, of all the things that he

764
00:26:53,634 --> 00:26:55,015
told me, the only thing I can remember

765
00:26:55,234 --> 00:26:57,654
is Steven Weinberg asking whether I like peanuts.

766
00:26:58,515 --> 00:26:59,474
But, you know, he was,

767
00:27:00,049 --> 00:27:00,369
you know, obviously,

768
00:27:01,169 --> 00:27:03,409
very talented person and, you know, fully deserving

769
00:27:03,409 --> 00:27:04,470
of the prize. And,

770
00:27:05,089 --> 00:27:06,609
you know, so let's see who wins this

771
00:27:06,609 --> 00:27:08,690
year. I'm sure whoever it is Hamish, their

772
00:27:08,690 --> 00:27:11,169
lives will be turned upside down and be,

773
00:27:11,169 --> 00:27:12,710
you know, transformed. And

774
00:27:13,544 --> 00:27:16,105
even in 2018, when Donna Strickland, the Canadian

775
00:27:16,184 --> 00:27:18,504
your Canadian compatriot won the Nobel Prize Who

776
00:27:18,504 --> 00:27:21,004
who, is a graduate of McMaster University

777
00:27:21,384 --> 00:27:24,204
on the website and the 2nd Nobel Laureate

778
00:27:24,424 --> 00:27:26,679
associated? It. Absolutely lovely person. And and I

779
00:27:26,679 --> 00:27:29,000
know her life has been sort of transformed,

780
00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:30,539
and you kind of need a whole

781
00:27:30,919 --> 00:27:32,919
entourage of people to sort of run your

782
00:27:32,919 --> 00:27:34,859
schedule because you're suddenly in demand.

783
00:27:36,519 --> 00:27:38,279
So let's see who win wins the prize

784
00:27:38,279 --> 00:27:39,019
this year.

785
00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:41,365
Remind me what were your suggestions again. You

786
00:27:41,365 --> 00:27:42,744
think Capaso and Henry,

787
00:27:43,125 --> 00:27:45,525
Lena Howe? Henry, Lena Howe. And I went

788
00:27:45,525 --> 00:27:47,285
for twisted Graphene. So,

789
00:27:47,845 --> 00:27:50,085
let's see who wins next week. Yeah. I

790
00:27:50,085 --> 00:27:51,845
mean, I really hope it's somebody that we

791
00:27:51,845 --> 00:27:52,345
know,

792
00:27:52,740 --> 00:27:54,740
you know, a friend of physics world. Wouldn't

793
00:27:54,740 --> 00:27:57,000
that be great if, you know, somebody

794
00:27:57,299 --> 00:28:00,599
we know wins? But we have absolutely no

795
00:28:00,819 --> 00:28:01,319
insight

796
00:28:01,779 --> 00:28:04,420
into who's going to win next week. So,

797
00:28:05,044 --> 00:28:07,284
may the best physicist win. Well, as we

798
00:28:07,284 --> 00:28:09,125
always say, you know, it takes 50 years

799
00:28:09,125 --> 00:28:11,544
before the archives are opened up. And so

800
00:28:12,164 --> 00:28:13,944
we will have to wait until 2074,

801
00:28:14,565 --> 00:28:16,164
which I don't think would be around then,

802
00:28:16,164 --> 00:28:18,644
Hamish, to find out the reasons why the

803
00:28:18,644 --> 00:28:20,900
prize was awarded this year. They're very careful

804
00:28:20,900 --> 00:28:22,980
not to sort of release details until that

805
00:28:22,980 --> 00:28:25,539
50 year rule has passed. So but we

806
00:28:25,539 --> 00:28:27,480
will certainly find out on Tuesday,

807
00:28:28,819 --> 00:28:32,440
8th October I believe so. 2024 at 10:45

808
00:28:33,460 --> 00:28:35,694
UK time. UK time. And let's hope there's

809
00:28:35,694 --> 00:28:37,294
not an embarrassing thing like there was with

810
00:28:37,294 --> 00:28:39,615
the chemistry prize last year where, Oh, was

811
00:28:39,615 --> 00:28:41,694
it leaked? It was leaked, wasn't it? That

812
00:28:41,694 --> 00:28:43,794
that was a first, I think. Yeah. Yeah.

813
00:28:44,254 --> 00:28:45,154
Very exciting.

814
00:28:45,534 --> 00:28:48,414
But, yeah, stay tuned to Physics World, on

815
00:28:48,414 --> 00:28:49,634
8th October.

816
00:28:50,000 --> 00:28:52,480
We'll have, we'll have an article out within

817
00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:52,980
minutes.

818
00:28:53,519 --> 00:28:54,820
That's our, tradition.

819
00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:57,680
So you can find out out all about

820
00:28:57,680 --> 00:29:00,180
the Nobel Laureate or Laureate,

821
00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:01,460
for 2024

822
00:29:02,174 --> 00:29:03,315
at Physics World.

823
00:29:03,855 --> 00:29:05,875
Okay. Thanks, Matin. Thanks, Hamish.

824
00:29:12,894 --> 00:29:14,654
I'm afraid that's all the time we have

825
00:29:14,654 --> 00:29:15,875
for this week's podcast.

826
00:29:16,190 --> 00:29:17,490
Thanks again to Matin

827
00:29:17,869 --> 00:29:18,609
and also

828
00:29:18,910 --> 00:29:21,089
to Fred Iles, our producer.

829
00:29:21,470 --> 00:29:23,809
This episode was supported by SmartAct,

830
00:29:24,349 --> 00:29:27,170
empowering breakthroughs in science and technology

831
00:29:27,710 --> 00:29:29,490
with high precision positioning,

832
00:29:30,029 --> 00:29:30,529
metrology,

833
00:29:31,184 --> 00:29:31,924
and automation

834
00:29:32,304 --> 00:29:32,804
solutions.

835
00:29:33,424 --> 00:29:33,924
Visit

836
00:29:34,304 --> 00:29:34,804
smartact.com

837
00:29:36,304 --> 00:29:37,284
to learn more.

Chapters

No chapters available.