Quantum metrology at NPL: we explore the challenges and opportunities

Physics World Weekly Podcast

This episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast features a conversation with Tim Prior and John Devaney of the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), which is the UK’s national metrology institute.

Prior is NPL’s quantum programme manager and Devaney is its quantum standards manager. They talk about NPL’s central role in the recent launch of NMI-Q, which brings together some of the world’s leading national metrology institutes to accelerate the development and adoption of quantum technologies.

Prior and Devaney describe the challenges and opportunities of developing metrology and standards for rapidly evolving technologies including quantum sensors, quantum computing and quantum cryptography. They talk about the importance of NPL’s collaborations with industry and academia and explore the diverse career opportunities for physicists at NPL. Prior and Devaney also talk about their own careers and share their enthusiasm for working in the cutting-edge and fast-paced field of quantum metrology.

This podcast is sponsored by the National Physical Laboratory.

Further reading

Why quantum metrology is the driving force for best practice in quantum standardization

Performance metrics and benchmarks point the way to practical quantum advantage

End note: NPL retains copyright on this article.

2026-01-14 25 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

1
00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,199
Hello, and welcome to this episode of the

2
00:00:11,199 --> 00:00:12,980
Physics World Weekly Podcast,

3
00:00:13,434 --> 00:00:16,974
which is sponsored by the National Physical Laboratory.

4
00:00:17,675 --> 00:00:19,134
I'm Hamish Johnston.

5
00:00:19,914 --> 00:00:21,774
The National Physical Laboratory

6
00:00:22,474 --> 00:00:23,214
or NPL

7
00:00:23,914 --> 00:00:24,814
is The UK's

8
00:00:25,274 --> 00:00:26,335
National Metrology

9
00:00:26,794 --> 00:00:27,294
Institute.

10
00:00:28,239 --> 00:00:31,059
It provides cutting edge measurement science,

11
00:00:31,519 --> 00:00:33,219
engineering, and technology

12
00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,280
to underpin prosperity and quality of life in

13
00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:37,939
The UK.

14
00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,579
NPL bridges the gap between research and industry

15
00:00:43,234 --> 00:00:45,335
by providing the measurement science,

16
00:00:45,635 --> 00:00:46,135
facilities,

17
00:00:46,674 --> 00:00:47,575
and expertise

18
00:00:48,195 --> 00:00:50,295
needed to accelerate innovation

19
00:00:50,914 --> 00:00:52,695
from lab to market

20
00:00:53,075 --> 00:00:54,615
across various sectors.

21
00:00:55,554 --> 00:00:57,655
One of those sectors is quantum,

22
00:00:58,179 --> 00:01:00,679
which we're going to dive into today.

23
00:01:01,460 --> 00:01:04,520
I'm joined by Tim Pryor, who is quantum

24
00:01:04,819 --> 00:01:07,000
program manager at NPL,

25
00:01:07,459 --> 00:01:08,840
and by John Devaney,

26
00:01:09,219 --> 00:01:10,359
who is NPL's

27
00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:12,840
quantum standards manager.

28
00:01:13,534 --> 00:01:14,755
Hi, Tim and John.

29
00:01:15,135 --> 00:01:16,355
Welcome to the podcast.

30
00:01:17,055 --> 00:01:19,775
Hi there. Great to be here. Hi. Pleased

31
00:01:19,775 --> 00:01:20,594
to meet you again.

32
00:01:21,135 --> 00:01:21,875
So, Tim,

33
00:01:22,174 --> 00:01:26,515
in October, NPL became a founding member of

34
00:01:26,575 --> 00:01:27,075
NMIQ,

35
00:01:28,340 --> 00:01:31,560
which is a global initiative to standardize metrology

36
00:01:32,180 --> 00:01:32,680
standards

37
00:01:33,219 --> 00:01:34,520
for quantum technologies.

38
00:01:34,900 --> 00:01:36,120
What is NMIQ,

39
00:01:36,819 --> 00:01:39,799
and why does NPL see it as crucial

40
00:01:40,180 --> 00:01:42,359
to the success of the quantum industry?

41
00:01:43,924 --> 00:01:44,825
So NMIQ

42
00:01:45,125 --> 00:01:46,905
is a, an initiative,

43
00:01:47,844 --> 00:01:50,584
between some of the world's leading national maturity

44
00:01:50,644 --> 00:01:52,504
institutes to work on prestandardization

45
00:01:53,444 --> 00:01:53,944
research

46
00:01:54,564 --> 00:01:56,745
leading to standards in the future.

47
00:01:57,780 --> 00:01:58,599
So quantum

48
00:01:59,140 --> 00:02:01,939
is often very complicated and has huge scope

49
00:02:01,939 --> 00:02:02,680
of application.

50
00:02:03,459 --> 00:02:04,099
This makes it,

51
00:02:04,819 --> 00:02:06,680
really difficult to understand the technologies

52
00:02:07,219 --> 00:02:09,879
sufficiently well to able to just standardize

53
00:02:11,525 --> 00:02:14,644
things. Faced with this problem, we work closely

54
00:02:14,644 --> 00:02:16,485
with The US first and then grant you

55
00:02:16,485 --> 00:02:17,764
with the other g seven,

56
00:02:18,245 --> 00:02:19,384
members and Australia

57
00:02:19,924 --> 00:02:20,985
to develop a framework

58
00:02:21,364 --> 00:02:23,144
that we can work together on standardization

59
00:02:23,924 --> 00:02:25,064
where there's a common

60
00:02:25,409 --> 00:02:25,909
strategic

61
00:02:26,530 --> 00:02:29,009
interest. The thing is because quantum is so

62
00:02:29,009 --> 00:02:30,150
broad and so difficult,

63
00:02:30,530 --> 00:02:32,449
no one country could do it all. So

64
00:02:32,449 --> 00:02:34,209
we have to work together on these sorts

65
00:02:34,209 --> 00:02:34,870
of issues.

66
00:02:36,370 --> 00:02:37,110
And, Tim,

67
00:02:37,489 --> 00:02:39,909
NPL has very, very strong

68
00:02:40,245 --> 00:02:41,705
connections with industry.

69
00:02:42,965 --> 00:02:46,325
What is industry telling you about what it

70
00:02:46,325 --> 00:02:48,185
wants from quantum standards?

71
00:02:49,525 --> 00:02:51,385
It's a that's a very interesting question.

72
00:02:52,325 --> 00:02:54,330
Industry tells us that

73
00:02:54,870 --> 00:02:57,110
you really need to work differently nowadays with

74
00:02:57,110 --> 00:02:57,610
standards.

75
00:02:57,989 --> 00:02:59,930
So emerging technologies traditionally

76
00:03:00,229 --> 00:03:02,729
have, had standards evolve gradually,

77
00:03:03,030 --> 00:03:05,449
probably in a serious type of effect.

78
00:03:05,915 --> 00:03:08,155
In reality now with the world being so

79
00:03:08,155 --> 00:03:08,655
global,

80
00:03:09,034 --> 00:03:12,395
information is shared almost instantly amongst everyone, and

81
00:03:12,395 --> 00:03:14,735
so everyone wants the answers right now.

82
00:03:15,194 --> 00:03:16,555
So if you want to make sure that

83
00:03:16,555 --> 00:03:17,295
your technology

84
00:03:17,754 --> 00:03:19,215
is part of the standardization

85
00:03:19,594 --> 00:03:21,375
process, which leads to adoption

86
00:03:21,810 --> 00:03:23,729
and use, then you've got to be working

87
00:03:23,729 --> 00:03:25,909
in this area in parallel to the innovation

88
00:03:25,969 --> 00:03:26,709
being developed.

89
00:03:27,409 --> 00:03:29,729
The thing is that innovators are usually so

90
00:03:29,729 --> 00:03:30,949
busy doing things,

91
00:03:31,330 --> 00:03:33,250
you know, like building the things they're trying

92
00:03:33,250 --> 00:03:36,064
to get standardized, so they don't always want

93
00:03:36,064 --> 00:03:36,884
to get involved.

94
00:03:37,344 --> 00:03:40,064
And this is where organizations like MPO can

95
00:03:40,064 --> 00:03:43,044
actually help them in the by expressing what

96
00:03:43,344 --> 00:03:45,504
they need to happen, we could look after

97
00:03:45,504 --> 00:03:47,344
them for that. In The UK, we've gone

98
00:03:47,344 --> 00:03:48,864
a bit further than that, and we've been

99
00:03:48,864 --> 00:03:49,764
running a pilot,

100
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:51,260
for,

101
00:03:51,879 --> 00:03:52,379
DCIT,

102
00:03:53,319 --> 00:03:55,819
called the UK Quantum Standards Network.

103
00:03:56,599 --> 00:03:59,159
And that is about bringing together all the

104
00:03:59,159 --> 00:04:02,405
government agencies that were interested in in in

105
00:04:02,405 --> 00:04:04,264
standardization of quantum technologies

106
00:04:04,885 --> 00:04:07,465
and sort of find make a more coordinated

107
00:04:07,764 --> 00:04:10,485
approach, making it easier for industry to get

108
00:04:10,485 --> 00:04:10,985
information,

109
00:04:11,365 --> 00:04:13,284
and making it easy for us to actually

110
00:04:13,284 --> 00:04:15,064
work together for a common interest.

111
00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:18,779
It it must be really difficult though, Tim,

112
00:04:18,840 --> 00:04:21,340
because quantum technology is evolving

113
00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:22,860
so quickly.

114
00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:25,819
What are the challenges of defining

115
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:26,620
standards,

116
00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:29,800
for the quantum industry in such a fast

117
00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:31,020
paced environment?

118
00:04:32,334 --> 00:04:35,055
It's it's very, very challenging. And, actually, a

119
00:04:35,055 --> 00:04:36,914
lot of the work we do in MPL

120
00:04:37,454 --> 00:04:39,615
is to talk to people outside to try

121
00:04:39,615 --> 00:04:42,254
and understand what their future requirements are going

122
00:04:42,254 --> 00:04:44,175
to be so that we can do the

123
00:04:44,175 --> 00:04:47,375
research necessary to make those standards in the

124
00:04:47,375 --> 00:04:47,875
future.

125
00:04:48,290 --> 00:04:49,810
And, of course, this comes back to the

126
00:04:49,810 --> 00:04:52,709
NMIQ thing. We can't do it all alone.

127
00:04:53,250 --> 00:04:53,750
And

128
00:04:54,129 --> 00:04:57,189
so we speak to all our sister organizations

129
00:04:57,810 --> 00:04:59,889
around the world to get there and and

130
00:04:59,889 --> 00:05:00,610
to put onto,

131
00:05:01,464 --> 00:05:02,985
how this might work and what we need

132
00:05:02,985 --> 00:05:03,805
to work on.

133
00:05:04,105 --> 00:05:07,064
But it's it's it's an amazing thing, really.

134
00:05:07,064 --> 00:05:07,564
So

135
00:05:08,584 --> 00:05:11,384
in metrology, we use quantum technologies for doing

136
00:05:11,384 --> 00:05:12,365
exquisite measurements,

137
00:05:12,904 --> 00:05:14,579
and that's turned around on its head now.

138
00:05:14,659 --> 00:05:16,500
So the ability to do that means that

139
00:05:16,500 --> 00:05:19,319
we can really truly input into the evolving

140
00:05:19,379 --> 00:05:20,360
quantum technologies.

141
00:05:20,819 --> 00:05:23,219
And that knowledge now that we've developed over

142
00:05:23,219 --> 00:05:26,339
decades of use is now becoming incredibly relevant

143
00:05:26,339 --> 00:05:28,199
to people in helping people understand

144
00:05:28,735 --> 00:05:31,074
what they have and how you compare something.

145
00:05:31,295 --> 00:05:33,535
I mean, some really interesting examples is, you

146
00:05:33,535 --> 00:05:34,514
know, if we

147
00:05:35,055 --> 00:05:38,415
think about the application everyone talks about, quantum

148
00:05:38,415 --> 00:05:38,915
computing,

149
00:05:39,295 --> 00:05:41,134
and people say, how do you compare one

150
00:05:41,134 --> 00:05:42,209
computer to another?

151
00:05:42,769 --> 00:05:44,870
That's an incredibly difficult question.

152
00:05:45,329 --> 00:05:47,490
There are so many different types of quantum

153
00:05:47,490 --> 00:05:47,990
computers,

154
00:05:48,610 --> 00:05:51,169
all in theory there to do things in

155
00:05:51,169 --> 00:05:54,129
slightly different ways. If you can find a

156
00:05:54,129 --> 00:05:55,349
methodology for,

157
00:05:55,915 --> 00:05:58,555
characterizing one computer, that might not be very

158
00:05:58,555 --> 00:05:59,694
good for another type.

159
00:06:00,154 --> 00:06:02,555
So it's incredibly difficult, and it's a real

160
00:06:02,555 --> 00:06:04,555
big challenge. Hence, you have to work together

161
00:06:04,555 --> 00:06:06,574
collaboratively to come up with these answers.

162
00:06:07,834 --> 00:06:10,920
And I suppose it's particularly difficult with quantum

163
00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:12,779
computing because we don't know

164
00:06:13,399 --> 00:06:13,899
which

165
00:06:14,199 --> 00:06:15,660
type of qubit

166
00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:17,019
will ultimately

167
00:06:17,319 --> 00:06:19,879
be used in, you know, sort of quantum

168
00:06:19,879 --> 00:06:22,519
computers of the future. And indeed, it might

169
00:06:22,519 --> 00:06:23,819
be more than one

170
00:06:24,194 --> 00:06:26,354
type of qubit. So it must be very

171
00:06:26,354 --> 00:06:27,414
difficult to,

172
00:06:28,274 --> 00:06:30,214
well, I suppose keep up with the development

173
00:06:30,435 --> 00:06:33,334
of qubit technologies and and come up with

174
00:06:33,394 --> 00:06:35,254
with ways of evaluating them.

175
00:06:36,115 --> 00:06:37,735
Very much so. It's, you know,

176
00:06:38,050 --> 00:06:40,290
the the question of which qubit is best

177
00:06:40,290 --> 00:06:40,790
or

178
00:06:41,090 --> 00:06:43,830
how do you compare different qubit modalities

179
00:06:44,689 --> 00:06:46,770
is a really, really difficult question, and it

180
00:06:46,770 --> 00:06:48,069
can keep, metrologists

181
00:06:48,370 --> 00:06:51,030
talking in a pub for days and arguing

182
00:06:51,090 --> 00:06:53,464
about it. But in reality, what we do

183
00:06:53,464 --> 00:06:55,145
is we take it right back to the

184
00:06:55,145 --> 00:06:57,785
fundamentals of the physics side of it and

185
00:06:57,785 --> 00:07:00,024
try to truly understand the mechanism of how

186
00:07:00,024 --> 00:07:01,165
these things are working.

187
00:07:01,545 --> 00:07:03,004
And then we try to

188
00:07:03,384 --> 00:07:05,225
give that information to the people who are

189
00:07:05,225 --> 00:07:06,365
using these qubits,

190
00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:08,720
in a way that's useful for them to

191
00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:10,819
understand how they might want to, for example,

192
00:07:10,879 --> 00:07:13,759
control material quality, which could affect how a

193
00:07:13,759 --> 00:07:15,060
qubit, work.

194
00:07:15,439 --> 00:07:17,759
But this again, with MPL does quite a

195
00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:19,920
lot of work in qubit technologies, but not

196
00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:22,355
in every type of qubit. So then we

197
00:07:22,355 --> 00:07:25,014
collaborate with, you know, The US, Japan,

198
00:07:25,555 --> 00:07:26,694
Germany, etcetera

199
00:07:27,314 --> 00:07:29,634
to get their input so that The UK

200
00:07:29,634 --> 00:07:31,014
can access that knowledge,

201
00:07:31,394 --> 00:07:33,795
and then our collaborators get the knowledge from

202
00:07:33,795 --> 00:07:34,935
The UK as well.

203
00:07:36,089 --> 00:07:38,169
And and John, I wanted to bring you

204
00:07:38,169 --> 00:07:38,649
in,

205
00:07:39,050 --> 00:07:41,149
and talk about quantum sensors,

206
00:07:41,850 --> 00:07:42,169
which,

207
00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:44,990
they they seem to be a fairly advanced,

208
00:07:45,850 --> 00:07:48,829
quantum technology with some commercial products

209
00:07:49,264 --> 00:07:50,404
available today.

210
00:07:50,865 --> 00:07:54,564
What metrology and standards are required to create

211
00:07:54,705 --> 00:07:55,444
high quality

212
00:07:55,904 --> 00:07:56,884
quantum sensors?

213
00:07:57,585 --> 00:07:59,665
Yeah. You're right. That there there are products

214
00:07:59,665 --> 00:08:02,485
on the market already, which are using quantum

215
00:08:02,545 --> 00:08:03,045
phenomena.

216
00:08:04,699 --> 00:08:06,860
But on that question of what standards are

217
00:08:06,860 --> 00:08:09,100
required, there are two sides to that. One

218
00:08:09,100 --> 00:08:11,419
is that quantum sensors are more sensitive, more

219
00:08:11,419 --> 00:08:13,919
accurate, and more useful than existing sensors.

220
00:08:14,620 --> 00:08:17,979
For example, magnetometers for monitoring brain function, drive

221
00:08:17,979 --> 00:08:21,285
emitters for mapping underground resources, spectroscopic

222
00:08:21,824 --> 00:08:22,324
photodetectors

223
00:08:23,105 --> 00:08:23,925
for assessing

224
00:08:24,544 --> 00:08:25,204
gas leaks.

225
00:08:25,824 --> 00:08:28,144
And what matters to those buying the sensor

226
00:08:28,144 --> 00:08:29,044
is its performance,

227
00:08:29,824 --> 00:08:30,959
not that it's quantum.

228
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,639
And in that it's in that sense, standards

229
00:08:34,639 --> 00:08:36,100
are needed to extend,

230
00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:41,139
the the standard standards range that already exists

231
00:08:41,839 --> 00:08:43,360
down into the end of these,

232
00:08:44,399 --> 00:08:45,860
finer and finer details.

233
00:08:47,835 --> 00:08:49,054
But on the other hand,

234
00:08:49,835 --> 00:08:51,934
quantum sensors can only be built with components

235
00:08:51,995 --> 00:08:52,654
and subsystems

236
00:08:53,355 --> 00:08:55,754
that are themselves tested and found ideal for

237
00:08:55,754 --> 00:08:56,415
the task.

238
00:08:56,875 --> 00:09:01,035
Iron traps, diamond substrates with nitrogen vacancies, NV

239
00:09:01,035 --> 00:09:01,535
centers,

240
00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:05,159
superconducting quantum interference devices, SQUIDs.

241
00:09:06,579 --> 00:09:08,120
These also need standards.

242
00:09:09,539 --> 00:09:11,720
So we are approaching it from both directions.

243
00:09:12,179 --> 00:09:15,559
We are helping characterize the the quantum devices

244
00:09:15,700 --> 00:09:17,159
and the quantum characteristics,

245
00:09:18,065 --> 00:09:20,144
And we're helping work out how it is

246
00:09:20,144 --> 00:09:21,125
that you actually,

247
00:09:22,225 --> 00:09:25,524
measure some assess something that is measuring something

248
00:09:25,825 --> 00:09:29,345
more accurately than anything else can, where there's

249
00:09:29,345 --> 00:09:31,365
nothing to compare it against.

250
00:09:31,745 --> 00:09:34,079
And, NMI is like NPL

251
00:09:34,459 --> 00:09:36,539
are are doing things like working out how

252
00:09:36,539 --> 00:09:38,799
how to characterize single photon detectors.

253
00:09:40,539 --> 00:09:43,500
The the only single photon detectors can detect

254
00:09:43,500 --> 00:09:44,240
single photons.

255
00:09:46,595 --> 00:09:48,855
And I I wanted to ask you about,

256
00:09:49,715 --> 00:09:52,134
single photon detectors and sources,

257
00:09:52,995 --> 00:09:56,215
in light of quantum cryptography, which is another

258
00:09:56,835 --> 00:09:59,795
quantum technology that, I mean, I I suppose

259
00:09:59,795 --> 00:10:01,980
you can say it's fairly mature. There are

260
00:10:02,220 --> 00:10:02,720
commercial

261
00:10:03,179 --> 00:10:04,480
systems available.

262
00:10:05,659 --> 00:10:08,299
And in those in that technology, it's really

263
00:10:08,299 --> 00:10:08,799
important

264
00:10:09,179 --> 00:10:11,360
to have photon sources and detectors

265
00:10:11,740 --> 00:10:13,120
that are high quality

266
00:10:13,740 --> 00:10:14,639
and secure.

267
00:10:15,274 --> 00:10:16,335
So how is NPL

268
00:10:16,794 --> 00:10:19,615
supporting the development of quantum cryptography?

269
00:10:20,315 --> 00:10:23,674
Yeah. So sources and detectors in themselves are

270
00:10:23,674 --> 00:10:24,815
are not secure.

271
00:10:25,355 --> 00:10:27,595
It's the way the system is built around

272
00:10:27,595 --> 00:10:29,774
it that that creates that security.

273
00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:32,000
And that is one of the,

274
00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:34,100
one of the aspects of

275
00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,659
the performance of a QKD system

276
00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:39,220
that is potentially vulnerable,

277
00:10:40,159 --> 00:10:41,620
to outside attack.

278
00:10:43,365 --> 00:10:46,985
We've, led the way in characterizing QKD systems,

279
00:10:47,044 --> 00:10:49,044
the boxes that are, as you say, are

280
00:10:49,044 --> 00:10:50,105
already on the market.

281
00:10:51,605 --> 00:10:54,324
QKD, just to elaborate, is a way of

282
00:10:54,324 --> 00:10:55,304
generating cryptographic

283
00:10:55,684 --> 00:10:58,870
keys that are unbreakable because they're intrinsically random.

284
00:10:59,090 --> 00:11:01,910
They use the randomness of of quantum physics.

285
00:11:02,929 --> 00:11:04,629
They do it by generating

286
00:11:05,009 --> 00:11:07,750
pairs of photons that are randomly coded.

287
00:11:08,375 --> 00:11:11,195
So there's two levels of randomness going on,

288
00:11:11,815 --> 00:11:12,954
usually by polarization.

289
00:11:13,735 --> 00:11:16,054
And then the process can't be intercepted if

290
00:11:16,054 --> 00:11:17,434
they are single photons

291
00:11:17,975 --> 00:11:20,154
without destroying that information, without

292
00:11:20,779 --> 00:11:23,179
the two the sender and receiver knowing that

293
00:11:23,179 --> 00:11:24,879
there's someone trying to break in.

294
00:11:25,340 --> 00:11:26,480
So like you say,

295
00:11:26,940 --> 00:11:27,679
the sources,

296
00:11:28,220 --> 00:11:29,840
but even most of the detectors,

297
00:11:30,779 --> 00:11:32,399
are a are a point of vulnerability

298
00:11:33,464 --> 00:11:35,725
because you can you can blind,

299
00:11:36,985 --> 00:11:37,225
the,

300
00:11:38,584 --> 00:11:39,324
the detector

301
00:11:39,865 --> 00:11:42,184
by by shining a put a brighter source

302
00:11:42,184 --> 00:11:43,725
into it and then

303
00:11:44,105 --> 00:11:47,144
use your own source to, to spoof the

304
00:11:47,144 --> 00:11:47,644
system.

305
00:11:48,750 --> 00:11:50,769
That's only one. There's other vulnerabilities

306
00:11:51,950 --> 00:11:54,750
like, they don't actually use single photons. And

307
00:11:54,750 --> 00:11:57,070
at this point, they tend to be small

308
00:11:57,070 --> 00:11:59,070
bundles of photons. But if they use too

309
00:11:59,070 --> 00:12:01,790
many, it's possible to split enough of them

310
00:12:01,790 --> 00:12:02,290
off

311
00:12:02,674 --> 00:12:03,315
and and,

312
00:12:04,674 --> 00:12:06,774
and join in on the the key,

313
00:12:07,475 --> 00:12:08,375
key reception.

314
00:12:09,154 --> 00:12:11,815
So we went through all the potential vulnerabilities.

315
00:12:12,514 --> 00:12:14,355
I say we, not me personally. I'm not

316
00:12:14,355 --> 00:12:15,414
allowed in the lab.

317
00:12:15,870 --> 00:12:17,950
We went through all the potential vulnerabilities that

318
00:12:17,950 --> 00:12:19,570
had been identified in QKD,

319
00:12:20,269 --> 00:12:21,090
and we tested

320
00:12:21,470 --> 00:12:23,250
we tested existing systems

321
00:12:23,870 --> 00:12:26,029
against them. And we and we worked out

322
00:12:26,029 --> 00:12:26,529
as

323
00:12:26,910 --> 00:12:28,990
the the sort of criteria that would be

324
00:12:28,990 --> 00:12:31,514
needed in the standard, And we took that

325
00:12:31,514 --> 00:12:32,654
into Etsy,

326
00:12:33,674 --> 00:12:35,754
for the building of their QKD sis

327
00:12:36,315 --> 00:12:37,294
standards family.

328
00:12:38,715 --> 00:12:41,595
And and, John, Tim's already touched a little

329
00:12:41,595 --> 00:12:43,615
bit on the need to

330
00:12:44,610 --> 00:12:48,789
develop performance metrics and benchmarking for quantum computers.

331
00:12:49,169 --> 00:12:52,049
And I understand that NPL is leading, an

332
00:12:52,049 --> 00:12:52,549
initiative,

333
00:12:53,649 --> 00:12:54,629
in that direction.

334
00:12:55,409 --> 00:12:57,649
Why do we need these metrics, and and

335
00:12:57,649 --> 00:13:00,149
what are the challenges in creating them?

336
00:13:01,075 --> 00:13:04,054
There's there is more than one initiative underway.

337
00:13:05,235 --> 00:13:07,394
And the one that I I closest to

338
00:13:07,394 --> 00:13:09,315
is the way that it's been brought into

339
00:13:09,315 --> 00:13:10,535
the standards world.

340
00:13:11,554 --> 00:13:13,254
It's too early for,

341
00:13:14,059 --> 00:13:15,120
full standardization,

342
00:13:16,059 --> 00:13:17,740
but there is a there is a there's

343
00:13:17,740 --> 00:13:20,059
a real demand from the potential buyers of

344
00:13:20,059 --> 00:13:20,959
quantum computers

345
00:13:21,339 --> 00:13:23,339
to know what it is, what are their

346
00:13:23,339 --> 00:13:25,659
strengths, and how do they compare one against

347
00:13:25,659 --> 00:13:26,320
the other.

348
00:13:26,945 --> 00:13:28,565
But that is far from

349
00:13:28,945 --> 00:13:30,085
a a simple question.

350
00:13:30,465 --> 00:13:33,125
It's not a simple question with conventional computers,

351
00:13:33,345 --> 00:13:35,665
but it's even more difficult when we have

352
00:13:35,665 --> 00:13:36,485
no universal

353
00:13:37,024 --> 00:13:40,120
error corrected quantum computer. As Tim said, there

354
00:13:40,120 --> 00:13:40,620
are

355
00:13:40,959 --> 00:13:41,459
a

356
00:13:41,799 --> 00:13:42,940
a number of platforms,

357
00:13:43,799 --> 00:13:45,659
including superconducting qubits,

358
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:47,019
ion traps,

359
00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,299
that are under consideration.

360
00:13:51,215 --> 00:13:53,774
In the early days of attempting to benchmark

361
00:13:53,774 --> 00:13:54,274
them,

362
00:13:54,735 --> 00:13:56,815
it was suggested that you could simply count

363
00:13:56,815 --> 00:13:58,815
the number of qubits and people will still

364
00:13:58,815 --> 00:13:59,715
put up graphs

365
00:14:00,254 --> 00:14:02,514
and say, my computer has

366
00:14:03,919 --> 00:14:06,559
48 or a 150

367
00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:07,620
cubits in it.

368
00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:10,399
And when it was it was realized that

369
00:14:10,399 --> 00:14:12,959
in terms of computing power, that wasn't enough.

370
00:14:12,959 --> 00:14:15,919
They moved to gate depth. How many how

371
00:14:15,919 --> 00:14:17,539
many gates, how many processes

372
00:14:17,985 --> 00:14:20,384
could your quantum processor go through before it

373
00:14:20,384 --> 00:14:21,365
lost the information?

374
00:14:22,304 --> 00:14:23,684
That too is too simplistic.

375
00:14:24,784 --> 00:14:25,524
And so,

376
00:14:27,184 --> 00:14:29,205
we're beginning to look at,

377
00:14:30,304 --> 00:14:32,085
at at more multidimensional

378
00:14:32,705 --> 00:14:33,205
aspects

379
00:14:33,610 --> 00:14:34,750
to hardware benchmarking.

380
00:14:35,610 --> 00:14:36,910
And at the same time,

381
00:14:37,690 --> 00:14:40,269
I'm trying to answer the question, if performance

382
00:14:40,410 --> 00:14:41,470
is what matters,

383
00:14:42,009 --> 00:14:44,750
surely, it's how quickly and how effectively

384
00:14:45,450 --> 00:14:46,190
your quantum

385
00:14:46,570 --> 00:14:47,070
processor

386
00:14:47,450 --> 00:14:49,704
can do a particular task.

387
00:14:50,964 --> 00:14:52,964
That, it turns out, isn't as simple a

388
00:14:52,964 --> 00:14:54,904
question as you might think either,

389
00:14:57,044 --> 00:15:00,004
partly because quantum processors are part of a

390
00:15:00,004 --> 00:15:00,450
stack

391
00:15:01,250 --> 00:15:03,029
in in a similar way to telecoms,

392
00:15:03,970 --> 00:15:06,049
and the error correction is happening in a

393
00:15:06,049 --> 00:15:07,669
multitude of different ways.

394
00:15:08,049 --> 00:15:10,290
But we're we're attacking that one as well,

395
00:15:10,290 --> 00:15:12,710
and and we're bringing the answers to these,

396
00:15:13,330 --> 00:15:14,149
these researches

397
00:15:14,955 --> 00:15:17,754
into the standards, particularly in SanSan, like the

398
00:15:17,754 --> 00:15:19,134
European standards bodies,

399
00:15:19,595 --> 00:15:22,634
and I see IEC ISO, the global standards

400
00:15:22,634 --> 00:15:24,415
bodies, where they're doing

401
00:15:24,875 --> 00:15:28,175
early stage standards. They're doing technical reports on

402
00:15:28,669 --> 00:15:29,329
the benchmarking

403
00:15:30,350 --> 00:15:33,470
systems that people have have come up with

404
00:15:33,470 --> 00:15:33,970
already.

405
00:15:35,470 --> 00:15:37,709
So so John and Tim, I I did

406
00:15:37,709 --> 00:15:40,289
my PhD many, many, many years ago,

407
00:15:40,715 --> 00:15:42,955
and I became a science journalist. But I

408
00:15:42,955 --> 00:15:44,554
often think about, you know, sort of an

409
00:15:44,554 --> 00:15:45,774
alternative universe

410
00:15:46,475 --> 00:15:48,894
where I could have done something else.

411
00:15:49,355 --> 00:15:51,934
And one thing that I've always found appealing

412
00:15:52,730 --> 00:15:55,049
is the idea of working at a place

413
00:15:55,049 --> 00:15:56,029
like NPL.

414
00:15:56,490 --> 00:15:58,029
I mean, it just sounds like,

415
00:15:58,569 --> 00:16:00,329
well, it doesn't sound like it. I know

416
00:16:00,329 --> 00:16:01,789
that people there are doing

417
00:16:03,129 --> 00:16:05,769
a vast, you know, sort of variety of

418
00:16:05,769 --> 00:16:09,254
really interesting research and working with industry and

419
00:16:09,554 --> 00:16:11,095
developing lots of,

420
00:16:11,475 --> 00:16:13,014
of of new technologies.

421
00:16:13,634 --> 00:16:15,875
So, you know, if if there's somebody out

422
00:16:15,875 --> 00:16:18,215
there who's just finished a PhD,

423
00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:22,679
How would you advise them in terms of,

424
00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:24,779
pursuing a career at NPL?

425
00:16:25,559 --> 00:16:26,379
What's available?

426
00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:28,840
So I think one of the things to

427
00:16:28,840 --> 00:16:31,740
first say is that measurement metrology

428
00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:35,764
underpins almost everything everybody does. So there are

429
00:16:35,764 --> 00:16:37,764
lots and lots of fields of interest that

430
00:16:37,764 --> 00:16:40,084
you can you can work within. And as

431
00:16:40,084 --> 00:16:41,784
I mentioned, at the beginning,

432
00:16:42,964 --> 00:16:45,684
we've been using quantum for doing really, really

433
00:16:45,684 --> 00:16:47,610
amazing measurements for a long time.

434
00:16:48,089 --> 00:16:49,870
So we called that quantum metrology.

435
00:16:50,730 --> 00:16:52,329
And that knowledge has led us to be

436
00:16:52,329 --> 00:16:53,149
able to do metrology

437
00:16:53,529 --> 00:16:54,269
for quantum.

438
00:16:54,809 --> 00:16:56,589
So this is basic fundamental

439
00:16:56,889 --> 00:16:59,529
science. So if that's what drives people, there

440
00:16:59,529 --> 00:17:01,309
is in these emerging technologies,

441
00:17:01,625 --> 00:17:04,284
there's a requirement to do fundamental physics.

442
00:17:05,304 --> 00:17:05,804
But

443
00:17:06,184 --> 00:17:08,345
as you develop that, you get to play

444
00:17:08,345 --> 00:17:09,404
with all the applying,

445
00:17:10,105 --> 00:17:11,964
uses of that of that technology.

446
00:17:12,424 --> 00:17:13,944
So we get to work in lots and

447
00:17:13,944 --> 00:17:14,845
lots of fields,

448
00:17:15,750 --> 00:17:17,910
really help to enable things to actually really,

449
00:17:17,910 --> 00:17:19,529
really happen. So exposure

450
00:17:19,910 --> 00:17:22,630
to lots of brilliant people around the country,

451
00:17:22,630 --> 00:17:24,869
around the world, it's an it's an amazing

452
00:17:24,869 --> 00:17:26,250
opportunity for people.

453
00:17:27,494 --> 00:17:28,154
I would

454
00:17:28,615 --> 00:17:29,115
add.

455
00:17:29,575 --> 00:17:31,335
One of the things about coming here to

456
00:17:31,335 --> 00:17:33,494
NPL so like like you, Hamish, I did

457
00:17:33,494 --> 00:17:35,414
my PhD, and then I went off and,

458
00:17:35,894 --> 00:17:36,934
I actually worked,

459
00:17:37,255 --> 00:17:39,355
for the, Institute of Physics Publishing.

460
00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:42,700
That's my that's my first foray into,

461
00:17:43,720 --> 00:17:44,779
public publishing.

462
00:17:46,839 --> 00:17:48,679
And it suited me down to the ground.

463
00:17:48,679 --> 00:17:51,000
I really liked my time there, and it

464
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:52,460
suited my way of working.

465
00:17:53,015 --> 00:17:54,075
Coming to NPL,

466
00:17:54,455 --> 00:17:56,375
having been there and having been in the

467
00:17:56,375 --> 00:17:57,674
standards world for

468
00:17:57,975 --> 00:17:58,795
twenty years,

469
00:18:00,535 --> 00:18:03,515
that what Tim's talking about, working on metrology,

470
00:18:04,215 --> 00:18:06,990
it really suits people who not just do

471
00:18:06,990 --> 00:18:09,470
proof of principle, which is largely what doing

472
00:18:09,470 --> 00:18:11,410
the PhD is, but love

473
00:18:11,950 --> 00:18:13,650
getting things down to

474
00:18:13,950 --> 00:18:15,009
that nth degree

475
00:18:15,309 --> 00:18:16,049
of of precision,

476
00:18:17,470 --> 00:18:19,534
which which is a is a very

477
00:18:19,835 --> 00:18:22,954
different mindset from you'll find almost anywhere else

478
00:18:22,954 --> 00:18:23,694
in the world.

479
00:18:24,075 --> 00:18:26,634
But that doesn't mean that's everyone at NPL

480
00:18:26,634 --> 00:18:28,974
because I they wouldn't have employed me otherwise.

481
00:18:30,329 --> 00:18:32,990
There there there's lots of different roles,

482
00:18:33,769 --> 00:18:34,909
within NPL

483
00:18:35,450 --> 00:18:36,909
other than working on

484
00:18:37,369 --> 00:18:37,869
metrology

485
00:18:38,569 --> 00:18:39,069
itself.

486
00:18:40,329 --> 00:18:42,329
And I'm I'm pleased that I've been taken

487
00:18:42,329 --> 00:18:44,829
on as a standards expert rather than

488
00:18:45,144 --> 00:18:47,005
as a an experimental physicist.

489
00:18:48,505 --> 00:18:50,744
And and I I should say that I'm

490
00:18:50,744 --> 00:18:52,904
guessing that it's it's not only people with

491
00:18:52,904 --> 00:18:54,125
PhDs in physics

492
00:18:54,505 --> 00:18:55,884
that you're looking for.

493
00:18:56,984 --> 00:18:58,204
Yeah. We're we're we're

494
00:18:58,609 --> 00:19:00,369
we're looking for all all people. And in

495
00:19:00,369 --> 00:19:02,470
fact, we have apprenticeship schemes where,

496
00:19:03,170 --> 00:19:05,170
you know, we we take people in and

497
00:19:05,170 --> 00:19:07,910
develop their skills. Engineers are really important.

498
00:19:08,769 --> 00:19:10,230
These people are sometimes

499
00:19:10,865 --> 00:19:12,805
more difficult to find than the PhD

500
00:19:13,825 --> 00:19:15,985
people. So there's lots of opportunities, but you

501
00:19:15,985 --> 00:19:18,065
need the support around it as well. Need

502
00:19:18,065 --> 00:19:20,725
the, people who need to understand intellectual property.

503
00:19:20,945 --> 00:19:23,365
The people who manage these highly complex,

504
00:19:24,289 --> 00:19:25,970
projects, especially when there are a lot of

505
00:19:25,970 --> 00:19:26,470
partners,

506
00:19:26,929 --> 00:19:27,429
etcetera.

507
00:19:27,890 --> 00:19:29,269
But I think the I mean,

508
00:19:29,890 --> 00:19:32,069
it's now quite recognized that

509
00:19:32,369 --> 00:19:34,369
you need to invest in this sort of

510
00:19:34,369 --> 00:19:34,869
infrastructure,

511
00:19:35,250 --> 00:19:36,869
you know, this measurement capability

512
00:19:37,424 --> 00:19:38,644
in order to actually

513
00:19:39,424 --> 00:19:41,424
allow these things to come to market, to

514
00:19:41,424 --> 00:19:43,045
give The UK the opportunity

515
00:19:43,345 --> 00:19:46,065
to have both growth in the GDP, but

516
00:19:46,065 --> 00:19:47,924
also look after its, security.

517
00:19:48,705 --> 00:19:51,184
And it's really good because The UK's national

518
00:19:51,184 --> 00:19:51,684
strategy

519
00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:54,640
quantum actually recognizes this and talks about it

520
00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:56,099
as a really important mechanism.

521
00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:58,640
And I think that's something that's really important

522
00:19:58,640 --> 00:19:59,140
because

523
00:19:59,679 --> 00:20:00,819
metrology institutes

524
00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:04,659
have been the unsung heroes behind the scenes

525
00:20:05,204 --> 00:20:05,704
for

526
00:20:06,005 --> 00:20:09,224
decades and decade developing capability that enables

527
00:20:09,525 --> 00:20:10,025
trade,

528
00:20:10,484 --> 00:20:12,904
enables safety, enables so many things.

529
00:20:13,365 --> 00:20:14,585
But because it happens

530
00:20:14,884 --> 00:20:15,384
seamlessly,

531
00:20:16,085 --> 00:20:16,585
usually,

532
00:20:17,059 --> 00:20:19,400
then it's just invisible to most people.

533
00:20:19,859 --> 00:20:22,359
But now people recognize with these very complex

534
00:20:22,420 --> 00:20:25,059
technologies coming to market that for those to

535
00:20:25,059 --> 00:20:27,079
happen, you have to have good metrology.

536
00:20:28,914 --> 00:20:31,154
And Tim, we we've spoken a bit about

537
00:20:31,154 --> 00:20:34,194
NPL's connections with industry, but I would assume

538
00:20:34,194 --> 00:20:35,654
that you have very strong,

539
00:20:36,275 --> 00:20:38,214
connections with the academic world,

540
00:20:38,835 --> 00:20:41,255
in physics and and other related,

541
00:20:42,914 --> 00:20:44,220
subjects. Is that right?

542
00:20:44,859 --> 00:20:47,980
Yeah. I mean, we again, we have we're

543
00:20:47,980 --> 00:20:49,200
a reasonably big laboratory,

544
00:20:49,579 --> 00:20:51,419
but the amount of questions we get asked,

545
00:20:51,419 --> 00:20:53,740
you couldn't answer them all yourself. And so

546
00:20:53,740 --> 00:20:55,500
MPL doesn't go out there to try and

547
00:20:55,500 --> 00:20:57,894
reinvent what other people have done. It goes

548
00:20:57,894 --> 00:20:59,654
out there to try and collaborate with the

549
00:20:59,654 --> 00:21:01,035
best people around the country.

550
00:21:01,494 --> 00:21:03,654
In, in the quantum side, that will be

551
00:21:03,654 --> 00:21:05,115
with the quantum hubs,

552
00:21:05,494 --> 00:21:07,015
but people outside that,

553
00:21:07,414 --> 00:21:07,914
international,

554
00:21:08,615 --> 00:21:09,755
academia, etcetera.

555
00:21:10,599 --> 00:21:13,240
We've tried to identify where we have gaps

556
00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,159
in our knowledge or The UK has gaps

557
00:21:15,159 --> 00:21:16,839
in its knowledge, and then we try to

558
00:21:16,839 --> 00:21:19,019
collaborate with the people who have those skills.

559
00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:21,500
And

560
00:21:21,974 --> 00:21:24,315
I just wanna ask both of you,

561
00:21:25,174 --> 00:21:27,494
what, you know, what do you find most

562
00:21:27,494 --> 00:21:28,954
exciting about working

563
00:21:29,575 --> 00:21:30,075
in

564
00:21:30,454 --> 00:21:30,954
quantum

565
00:21:31,654 --> 00:21:34,454
metrology? Is it is it the the the

566
00:21:34,454 --> 00:21:36,930
pace of change and, you you know, the

567
00:21:37,410 --> 00:21:39,410
always having to keep up with the latest

568
00:21:39,410 --> 00:21:40,470
research? Or

569
00:21:41,330 --> 00:21:43,330
is it just the novelty that, you know,

570
00:21:43,330 --> 00:21:44,150
these these

571
00:21:44,930 --> 00:21:45,430
esoteric

572
00:21:46,049 --> 00:21:48,549
concepts of quantum physics can be

573
00:21:49,664 --> 00:21:50,404
turned into

574
00:21:50,705 --> 00:21:52,785
technologies? What, you know, what what gets you

575
00:21:52,785 --> 00:21:54,485
guys up, in the morning?

576
00:21:56,144 --> 00:21:58,144
I'd go with the first one. It's, it

577
00:21:58,305 --> 00:22:00,945
it's remarkable. I mean, I've my background was

578
00:22:00,945 --> 00:22:01,684
in optoelectronics

579
00:22:02,144 --> 00:22:02,884
and communications.

580
00:22:03,664 --> 00:22:05,045
And back in the nineties,

581
00:22:06,089 --> 00:22:08,170
you would go to conferences every year, and

582
00:22:08,170 --> 00:22:08,829
they would

583
00:22:09,130 --> 00:22:12,170
be making promises which were slightly better than

584
00:22:12,170 --> 00:22:14,730
previously. But there was no there was nothing

585
00:22:14,730 --> 00:22:15,230
groundbreaking

586
00:22:15,769 --> 00:22:18,134
about it. The physics was well known, and

587
00:22:18,214 --> 00:22:20,295
and they were really just solving engineering and

588
00:22:20,295 --> 00:22:21,515
manufacturing problems,

589
00:22:21,815 --> 00:22:23,815
which isn't easy, which is why I don't

590
00:22:23,815 --> 00:22:24,954
do it. That either.

591
00:22:26,055 --> 00:22:26,875
But now

592
00:22:27,255 --> 00:22:29,414
the the real progress and when one of

593
00:22:29,414 --> 00:22:31,319
the areas within quantum where

594
00:22:31,799 --> 00:22:34,119
progress has been massive in just the last

595
00:22:34,119 --> 00:22:35,259
two or three years

596
00:22:35,639 --> 00:22:37,659
is in, distributed entanglement

597
00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:40,279
where the the the test

598
00:22:41,079 --> 00:22:42,059
three years ago,

599
00:22:42,759 --> 00:22:45,019
the the first tests that you could send

600
00:22:45,765 --> 00:22:47,144
an entangled photon

601
00:22:47,445 --> 00:22:48,744
out over,

602
00:22:49,125 --> 00:22:51,625
say, 15 kilometers of fiber and

603
00:22:52,244 --> 00:22:54,184
and measurably still be entangled

604
00:22:54,884 --> 00:22:57,125
had just been done. And now there are

605
00:22:57,125 --> 00:22:59,144
test networks all over the world,

606
00:22:59,450 --> 00:23:01,549
which are getting ready for product

607
00:23:02,009 --> 00:23:04,910
to make to use quantum entanglement in in

608
00:23:05,210 --> 00:23:06,509
in networks at scale.

609
00:23:07,049 --> 00:23:09,549
That that sort of pace of change is,

610
00:23:10,250 --> 00:23:11,549
quite exciting, really.

611
00:23:12,250 --> 00:23:13,710
And what about you, Tim?

612
00:23:14,275 --> 00:23:16,934
So for me, I mean, it's it's truly

613
00:23:17,154 --> 00:23:19,315
a privilege to be part of working with

614
00:23:19,315 --> 00:23:22,115
so many talented people either at NPL or

615
00:23:22,115 --> 00:23:24,755
in academia and industry in The UK or

616
00:23:24,755 --> 00:23:25,255
international.

617
00:23:25,714 --> 00:23:27,654
You get to see so many different

618
00:23:28,035 --> 00:23:30,549
people. You get to see so many brilliant

619
00:23:30,549 --> 00:23:31,049
technologies.

620
00:23:31,669 --> 00:23:33,210
Last week, I was at CERN.

621
00:23:34,230 --> 00:23:36,230
You know, you get exposed to the things

622
00:23:36,230 --> 00:23:37,990
that you you know, when you're at university,

623
00:23:37,990 --> 00:23:41,049
you only ever dreamt about getting involved in.

624
00:23:41,190 --> 00:23:41,929
And yet

625
00:23:42,544 --> 00:23:45,184
through metrology and through working with a an

626
00:23:45,184 --> 00:23:46,964
organization that's very international,

627
00:23:47,585 --> 00:23:49,684
it's amazing what you can get involved in.

628
00:23:51,345 --> 00:23:54,304
Well, that's great. Thanks. Thanks, Tim and John,

629
00:23:54,304 --> 00:23:55,684
for coming on the podcast,

630
00:23:56,224 --> 00:23:56,724
today.

631
00:23:57,440 --> 00:23:58,819
No worries. Thanks, Janesh.

632
00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:10,259
That was NPL's Tim Pryor and John Devaney.

633
00:24:10,785 --> 00:24:12,725
Thanks to both of them for a fascinating

634
00:24:12,945 --> 00:24:13,445
conversation.

635
00:24:14,065 --> 00:24:17,105
I'm Hamish Johnston, and our producer is Fred

636
00:24:17,105 --> 00:24:17,605
Isles.

637
00:24:18,305 --> 00:24:21,605
This podcast is sponsored by the National Physical

638
00:24:21,664 --> 00:24:22,164
Laboratory,

639
00:24:22,785 --> 00:24:25,445
which retains copyright on this episode.

640
00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:27,779
NPL is The UK's

641
00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:29,299
National Metrology

642
00:24:29,840 --> 00:24:30,340
Institute.

643
00:24:31,039 --> 00:24:34,660
It provides cutting edge measurement science, engineering,

644
00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:35,859
and technology

645
00:24:36,480 --> 00:24:37,859
to underpin prosperity

646
00:24:38,160 --> 00:24:40,660
and quality of life in The UK.

647
00:24:41,505 --> 00:24:44,884
NPL bridges the gap between research and industry

648
00:24:45,265 --> 00:24:48,244
by providing the measurement science, facilities,

649
00:24:48,704 --> 00:24:49,605
and expertise

650
00:24:50,144 --> 00:24:51,365
needed to accelerate

651
00:24:51,744 --> 00:24:52,244
innovation

652
00:24:52,704 --> 00:24:54,404
from lab to market

653
00:24:54,785 --> 00:24:56,404
across various sectors,

654
00:24:57,110 --> 00:24:58,330
including quantum.

Chapters

No chapters available.