Quantum metrology at NPL: we explore the challenges and opportunities
This episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast features a conversation with Tim Prior and John Devaney of the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), which is the UK’s national metrology institute.
Prior is NPL’s quantum programme manager and Devaney is its quantum standards manager. They talk about NPL’s central role in the recent launch of NMI-Q, which brings together some of the world’s leading national metrology institutes to accelerate the development and adoption of quantum technologies.
Prior and Devaney describe the challenges and opportunities of developing metrology and standards for rapidly evolving technologies including quantum sensors, quantum computing and quantum cryptography. They talk about the importance of NPL’s collaborations with industry and academia and explore the diverse career opportunities for physicists at NPL. Prior and Devaney also talk about their own careers and share their enthusiasm for working in the cutting-edge and fast-paced field of quantum metrology.
This podcast is sponsored by the National Physical Laboratory.
Further readingWhy quantum metrology is the driving force for best practice in quantum standardization
Performance metrics and benchmarks point the way to practical quantum advantage
End note: NPL retains copyright on this article.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
1 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,199 Hello, and welcome to this episode of the 2 00:00:11,199 --> 00:00:12,980 Physics World Weekly Podcast, 3 00:00:13,434 --> 00:00:16,974 which is sponsored by the National Physical Laboratory. 4 00:00:17,675 --> 00:00:19,134 I'm Hamish Johnston. 5 00:00:19,914 --> 00:00:21,774 The National Physical Laboratory 6 00:00:22,474 --> 00:00:23,214 or NPL 7 00:00:23,914 --> 00:00:24,814 is The UK's 8 00:00:25,274 --> 00:00:26,335 National Metrology 9 00:00:26,794 --> 00:00:27,294 Institute. 10 00:00:28,239 --> 00:00:31,059 It provides cutting edge measurement science, 11 00:00:31,519 --> 00:00:33,219 engineering, and technology 12 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,280 to underpin prosperity and quality of life in 13 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:37,939 The UK. 14 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,579 NPL bridges the gap between research and industry 15 00:00:43,234 --> 00:00:45,335 by providing the measurement science, 16 00:00:45,635 --> 00:00:46,135 facilities, 17 00:00:46,674 --> 00:00:47,575 and expertise 18 00:00:48,195 --> 00:00:50,295 needed to accelerate innovation 19 00:00:50,914 --> 00:00:52,695 from lab to market 20 00:00:53,075 --> 00:00:54,615 across various sectors. 21 00:00:55,554 --> 00:00:57,655 One of those sectors is quantum, 22 00:00:58,179 --> 00:01:00,679 which we're going to dive into today. 23 00:01:01,460 --> 00:01:04,520 I'm joined by Tim Pryor, who is quantum 24 00:01:04,819 --> 00:01:07,000 program manager at NPL, 25 00:01:07,459 --> 00:01:08,840 and by John Devaney, 26 00:01:09,219 --> 00:01:10,359 who is NPL's 27 00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:12,840 quantum standards manager. 28 00:01:13,534 --> 00:01:14,755 Hi, Tim and John. 29 00:01:15,135 --> 00:01:16,355 Welcome to the podcast. 30 00:01:17,055 --> 00:01:19,775 Hi there. Great to be here. Hi. Pleased 31 00:01:19,775 --> 00:01:20,594 to meet you again. 32 00:01:21,135 --> 00:01:21,875 So, Tim, 33 00:01:22,174 --> 00:01:26,515 in October, NPL became a founding member of 34 00:01:26,575 --> 00:01:27,075 NMIQ, 35 00:01:28,340 --> 00:01:31,560 which is a global initiative to standardize metrology 36 00:01:32,180 --> 00:01:32,680 standards 37 00:01:33,219 --> 00:01:34,520 for quantum technologies. 38 00:01:34,900 --> 00:01:36,120 What is NMIQ, 39 00:01:36,819 --> 00:01:39,799 and why does NPL see it as crucial 40 00:01:40,180 --> 00:01:42,359 to the success of the quantum industry? 41 00:01:43,924 --> 00:01:44,825 So NMIQ 42 00:01:45,125 --> 00:01:46,905 is a, an initiative, 43 00:01:47,844 --> 00:01:50,584 between some of the world's leading national maturity 44 00:01:50,644 --> 00:01:52,504 institutes to work on prestandardization 45 00:01:53,444 --> 00:01:53,944 research 46 00:01:54,564 --> 00:01:56,745 leading to standards in the future. 47 00:01:57,780 --> 00:01:58,599 So quantum 48 00:01:59,140 --> 00:02:01,939 is often very complicated and has huge scope 49 00:02:01,939 --> 00:02:02,680 of application. 50 00:02:03,459 --> 00:02:04,099 This makes it, 51 00:02:04,819 --> 00:02:06,680 really difficult to understand the technologies 52 00:02:07,219 --> 00:02:09,879 sufficiently well to able to just standardize 53 00:02:11,525 --> 00:02:14,644 things. Faced with this problem, we work closely 54 00:02:14,644 --> 00:02:16,485 with The US first and then grant you 55 00:02:16,485 --> 00:02:17,764 with the other g seven, 56 00:02:18,245 --> 00:02:19,384 members and Australia 57 00:02:19,924 --> 00:02:20,985 to develop a framework 58 00:02:21,364 --> 00:02:23,144 that we can work together on standardization 59 00:02:23,924 --> 00:02:25,064 where there's a common 60 00:02:25,409 --> 00:02:25,909 strategic 61 00:02:26,530 --> 00:02:29,009 interest. The thing is because quantum is so 62 00:02:29,009 --> 00:02:30,150 broad and so difficult, 63 00:02:30,530 --> 00:02:32,449 no one country could do it all. So 64 00:02:32,449 --> 00:02:34,209 we have to work together on these sorts 65 00:02:34,209 --> 00:02:34,870 of issues. 66 00:02:36,370 --> 00:02:37,110 And, Tim, 67 00:02:37,489 --> 00:02:39,909 NPL has very, very strong 68 00:02:40,245 --> 00:02:41,705 connections with industry. 69 00:02:42,965 --> 00:02:46,325 What is industry telling you about what it 70 00:02:46,325 --> 00:02:48,185 wants from quantum standards? 71 00:02:49,525 --> 00:02:51,385 It's a that's a very interesting question. 72 00:02:52,325 --> 00:02:54,330 Industry tells us that 73 00:02:54,870 --> 00:02:57,110 you really need to work differently nowadays with 74 00:02:57,110 --> 00:02:57,610 standards. 75 00:02:57,989 --> 00:02:59,930 So emerging technologies traditionally 76 00:03:00,229 --> 00:03:02,729 have, had standards evolve gradually, 77 00:03:03,030 --> 00:03:05,449 probably in a serious type of effect. 78 00:03:05,915 --> 00:03:08,155 In reality now with the world being so 79 00:03:08,155 --> 00:03:08,655 global, 80 00:03:09,034 --> 00:03:12,395 information is shared almost instantly amongst everyone, and 81 00:03:12,395 --> 00:03:14,735 so everyone wants the answers right now. 82 00:03:15,194 --> 00:03:16,555 So if you want to make sure that 83 00:03:16,555 --> 00:03:17,295 your technology 84 00:03:17,754 --> 00:03:19,215 is part of the standardization 85 00:03:19,594 --> 00:03:21,375 process, which leads to adoption 86 00:03:21,810 --> 00:03:23,729 and use, then you've got to be working 87 00:03:23,729 --> 00:03:25,909 in this area in parallel to the innovation 88 00:03:25,969 --> 00:03:26,709 being developed. 89 00:03:27,409 --> 00:03:29,729 The thing is that innovators are usually so 90 00:03:29,729 --> 00:03:30,949 busy doing things, 91 00:03:31,330 --> 00:03:33,250 you know, like building the things they're trying 92 00:03:33,250 --> 00:03:36,064 to get standardized, so they don't always want 93 00:03:36,064 --> 00:03:36,884 to get involved. 94 00:03:37,344 --> 00:03:40,064 And this is where organizations like MPO can 95 00:03:40,064 --> 00:03:43,044 actually help them in the by expressing what 96 00:03:43,344 --> 00:03:45,504 they need to happen, we could look after 97 00:03:45,504 --> 00:03:47,344 them for that. In The UK, we've gone 98 00:03:47,344 --> 00:03:48,864 a bit further than that, and we've been 99 00:03:48,864 --> 00:03:49,764 running a pilot, 100 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:51,260 for, 101 00:03:51,879 --> 00:03:52,379 DCIT, 102 00:03:53,319 --> 00:03:55,819 called the UK Quantum Standards Network. 103 00:03:56,599 --> 00:03:59,159 And that is about bringing together all the 104 00:03:59,159 --> 00:04:02,405 government agencies that were interested in in in 105 00:04:02,405 --> 00:04:04,264 standardization of quantum technologies 106 00:04:04,885 --> 00:04:07,465 and sort of find make a more coordinated 107 00:04:07,764 --> 00:04:10,485 approach, making it easier for industry to get 108 00:04:10,485 --> 00:04:10,985 information, 109 00:04:11,365 --> 00:04:13,284 and making it easy for us to actually 110 00:04:13,284 --> 00:04:15,064 work together for a common interest. 111 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:18,779 It it must be really difficult though, Tim, 112 00:04:18,840 --> 00:04:21,340 because quantum technology is evolving 113 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:22,860 so quickly. 114 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:25,819 What are the challenges of defining 115 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:26,620 standards, 116 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:29,800 for the quantum industry in such a fast 117 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:31,020 paced environment? 118 00:04:32,334 --> 00:04:35,055 It's it's very, very challenging. And, actually, a 119 00:04:35,055 --> 00:04:36,914 lot of the work we do in MPL 120 00:04:37,454 --> 00:04:39,615 is to talk to people outside to try 121 00:04:39,615 --> 00:04:42,254 and understand what their future requirements are going 122 00:04:42,254 --> 00:04:44,175 to be so that we can do the 123 00:04:44,175 --> 00:04:47,375 research necessary to make those standards in the 124 00:04:47,375 --> 00:04:47,875 future. 125 00:04:48,290 --> 00:04:49,810 And, of course, this comes back to the 126 00:04:49,810 --> 00:04:52,709 NMIQ thing. We can't do it all alone. 127 00:04:53,250 --> 00:04:53,750 And 128 00:04:54,129 --> 00:04:57,189 so we speak to all our sister organizations 129 00:04:57,810 --> 00:04:59,889 around the world to get there and and 130 00:04:59,889 --> 00:05:00,610 to put onto, 131 00:05:01,464 --> 00:05:02,985 how this might work and what we need 132 00:05:02,985 --> 00:05:03,805 to work on. 133 00:05:04,105 --> 00:05:07,064 But it's it's it's an amazing thing, really. 134 00:05:07,064 --> 00:05:07,564 So 135 00:05:08,584 --> 00:05:11,384 in metrology, we use quantum technologies for doing 136 00:05:11,384 --> 00:05:12,365 exquisite measurements, 137 00:05:12,904 --> 00:05:14,579 and that's turned around on its head now. 138 00:05:14,659 --> 00:05:16,500 So the ability to do that means that 139 00:05:16,500 --> 00:05:19,319 we can really truly input into the evolving 140 00:05:19,379 --> 00:05:20,360 quantum technologies. 141 00:05:20,819 --> 00:05:23,219 And that knowledge now that we've developed over 142 00:05:23,219 --> 00:05:26,339 decades of use is now becoming incredibly relevant 143 00:05:26,339 --> 00:05:28,199 to people in helping people understand 144 00:05:28,735 --> 00:05:31,074 what they have and how you compare something. 145 00:05:31,295 --> 00:05:33,535 I mean, some really interesting examples is, you 146 00:05:33,535 --> 00:05:34,514 know, if we 147 00:05:35,055 --> 00:05:38,415 think about the application everyone talks about, quantum 148 00:05:38,415 --> 00:05:38,915 computing, 149 00:05:39,295 --> 00:05:41,134 and people say, how do you compare one 150 00:05:41,134 --> 00:05:42,209 computer to another? 151 00:05:42,769 --> 00:05:44,870 That's an incredibly difficult question. 152 00:05:45,329 --> 00:05:47,490 There are so many different types of quantum 153 00:05:47,490 --> 00:05:47,990 computers, 154 00:05:48,610 --> 00:05:51,169 all in theory there to do things in 155 00:05:51,169 --> 00:05:54,129 slightly different ways. If you can find a 156 00:05:54,129 --> 00:05:55,349 methodology for, 157 00:05:55,915 --> 00:05:58,555 characterizing one computer, that might not be very 158 00:05:58,555 --> 00:05:59,694 good for another type. 159 00:06:00,154 --> 00:06:02,555 So it's incredibly difficult, and it's a real 160 00:06:02,555 --> 00:06:04,555 big challenge. Hence, you have to work together 161 00:06:04,555 --> 00:06:06,574 collaboratively to come up with these answers. 162 00:06:07,834 --> 00:06:10,920 And I suppose it's particularly difficult with quantum 163 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:12,779 computing because we don't know 164 00:06:13,399 --> 00:06:13,899 which 165 00:06:14,199 --> 00:06:15,660 type of qubit 166 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:17,019 will ultimately 167 00:06:17,319 --> 00:06:19,879 be used in, you know, sort of quantum 168 00:06:19,879 --> 00:06:22,519 computers of the future. And indeed, it might 169 00:06:22,519 --> 00:06:23,819 be more than one 170 00:06:24,194 --> 00:06:26,354 type of qubit. So it must be very 171 00:06:26,354 --> 00:06:27,414 difficult to, 172 00:06:28,274 --> 00:06:30,214 well, I suppose keep up with the development 173 00:06:30,435 --> 00:06:33,334 of qubit technologies and and come up with 174 00:06:33,394 --> 00:06:35,254 with ways of evaluating them. 175 00:06:36,115 --> 00:06:37,735 Very much so. It's, you know, 176 00:06:38,050 --> 00:06:40,290 the the question of which qubit is best 177 00:06:40,290 --> 00:06:40,790 or 178 00:06:41,090 --> 00:06:43,830 how do you compare different qubit modalities 179 00:06:44,689 --> 00:06:46,770 is a really, really difficult question, and it 180 00:06:46,770 --> 00:06:48,069 can keep, metrologists 181 00:06:48,370 --> 00:06:51,030 talking in a pub for days and arguing 182 00:06:51,090 --> 00:06:53,464 about it. But in reality, what we do 183 00:06:53,464 --> 00:06:55,145 is we take it right back to the 184 00:06:55,145 --> 00:06:57,785 fundamentals of the physics side of it and 185 00:06:57,785 --> 00:07:00,024 try to truly understand the mechanism of how 186 00:07:00,024 --> 00:07:01,165 these things are working. 187 00:07:01,545 --> 00:07:03,004 And then we try to 188 00:07:03,384 --> 00:07:05,225 give that information to the people who are 189 00:07:05,225 --> 00:07:06,365 using these qubits, 190 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:08,720 in a way that's useful for them to 191 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:10,819 understand how they might want to, for example, 192 00:07:10,879 --> 00:07:13,759 control material quality, which could affect how a 193 00:07:13,759 --> 00:07:15,060 qubit, work. 194 00:07:15,439 --> 00:07:17,759 But this again, with MPL does quite a 195 00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:19,920 lot of work in qubit technologies, but not 196 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:22,355 in every type of qubit. So then we 197 00:07:22,355 --> 00:07:25,014 collaborate with, you know, The US, Japan, 198 00:07:25,555 --> 00:07:26,694 Germany, etcetera 199 00:07:27,314 --> 00:07:29,634 to get their input so that The UK 200 00:07:29,634 --> 00:07:31,014 can access that knowledge, 201 00:07:31,394 --> 00:07:33,795 and then our collaborators get the knowledge from 202 00:07:33,795 --> 00:07:34,935 The UK as well. 203 00:07:36,089 --> 00:07:38,169 And and John, I wanted to bring you 204 00:07:38,169 --> 00:07:38,649 in, 205 00:07:39,050 --> 00:07:41,149 and talk about quantum sensors, 206 00:07:41,850 --> 00:07:42,169 which, 207 00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:44,990 they they seem to be a fairly advanced, 208 00:07:45,850 --> 00:07:48,829 quantum technology with some commercial products 209 00:07:49,264 --> 00:07:50,404 available today. 210 00:07:50,865 --> 00:07:54,564 What metrology and standards are required to create 211 00:07:54,705 --> 00:07:55,444 high quality 212 00:07:55,904 --> 00:07:56,884 quantum sensors? 213 00:07:57,585 --> 00:07:59,665 Yeah. You're right. That there there are products 214 00:07:59,665 --> 00:08:02,485 on the market already, which are using quantum 215 00:08:02,545 --> 00:08:03,045 phenomena. 216 00:08:04,699 --> 00:08:06,860 But on that question of what standards are 217 00:08:06,860 --> 00:08:09,100 required, there are two sides to that. One 218 00:08:09,100 --> 00:08:11,419 is that quantum sensors are more sensitive, more 219 00:08:11,419 --> 00:08:13,919 accurate, and more useful than existing sensors. 220 00:08:14,620 --> 00:08:17,979 For example, magnetometers for monitoring brain function, drive 221 00:08:17,979 --> 00:08:21,285 emitters for mapping underground resources, spectroscopic 222 00:08:21,824 --> 00:08:22,324 photodetectors 223 00:08:23,105 --> 00:08:23,925 for assessing 224 00:08:24,544 --> 00:08:25,204 gas leaks. 225 00:08:25,824 --> 00:08:28,144 And what matters to those buying the sensor 226 00:08:28,144 --> 00:08:29,044 is its performance, 227 00:08:29,824 --> 00:08:30,959 not that it's quantum. 228 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,639 And in that it's in that sense, standards 229 00:08:34,639 --> 00:08:36,100 are needed to extend, 230 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:41,139 the the standard standards range that already exists 231 00:08:41,839 --> 00:08:43,360 down into the end of these, 232 00:08:44,399 --> 00:08:45,860 finer and finer details. 233 00:08:47,835 --> 00:08:49,054 But on the other hand, 234 00:08:49,835 --> 00:08:51,934 quantum sensors can only be built with components 235 00:08:51,995 --> 00:08:52,654 and subsystems 236 00:08:53,355 --> 00:08:55,754 that are themselves tested and found ideal for 237 00:08:55,754 --> 00:08:56,415 the task. 238 00:08:56,875 --> 00:09:01,035 Iron traps, diamond substrates with nitrogen vacancies, NV 239 00:09:01,035 --> 00:09:01,535 centers, 240 00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:05,159 superconducting quantum interference devices, SQUIDs. 241 00:09:06,579 --> 00:09:08,120 These also need standards. 242 00:09:09,539 --> 00:09:11,720 So we are approaching it from both directions. 243 00:09:12,179 --> 00:09:15,559 We are helping characterize the the quantum devices 244 00:09:15,700 --> 00:09:17,159 and the quantum characteristics, 245 00:09:18,065 --> 00:09:20,144 And we're helping work out how it is 246 00:09:20,144 --> 00:09:21,125 that you actually, 247 00:09:22,225 --> 00:09:25,524 measure some assess something that is measuring something 248 00:09:25,825 --> 00:09:29,345 more accurately than anything else can, where there's 249 00:09:29,345 --> 00:09:31,365 nothing to compare it against. 250 00:09:31,745 --> 00:09:34,079 And, NMI is like NPL 251 00:09:34,459 --> 00:09:36,539 are are doing things like working out how 252 00:09:36,539 --> 00:09:38,799 how to characterize single photon detectors. 253 00:09:40,539 --> 00:09:43,500 The the only single photon detectors can detect 254 00:09:43,500 --> 00:09:44,240 single photons. 255 00:09:46,595 --> 00:09:48,855 And I I wanted to ask you about, 256 00:09:49,715 --> 00:09:52,134 single photon detectors and sources, 257 00:09:52,995 --> 00:09:56,215 in light of quantum cryptography, which is another 258 00:09:56,835 --> 00:09:59,795 quantum technology that, I mean, I I suppose 259 00:09:59,795 --> 00:10:01,980 you can say it's fairly mature. There are 260 00:10:02,220 --> 00:10:02,720 commercial 261 00:10:03,179 --> 00:10:04,480 systems available. 262 00:10:05,659 --> 00:10:08,299 And in those in that technology, it's really 263 00:10:08,299 --> 00:10:08,799 important 264 00:10:09,179 --> 00:10:11,360 to have photon sources and detectors 265 00:10:11,740 --> 00:10:13,120 that are high quality 266 00:10:13,740 --> 00:10:14,639 and secure. 267 00:10:15,274 --> 00:10:16,335 So how is NPL 268 00:10:16,794 --> 00:10:19,615 supporting the development of quantum cryptography? 269 00:10:20,315 --> 00:10:23,674 Yeah. So sources and detectors in themselves are 270 00:10:23,674 --> 00:10:24,815 are not secure. 271 00:10:25,355 --> 00:10:27,595 It's the way the system is built around 272 00:10:27,595 --> 00:10:29,774 it that that creates that security. 273 00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:32,000 And that is one of the, 274 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:34,100 one of the aspects of 275 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,659 the performance of a QKD system 276 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:39,220 that is potentially vulnerable, 277 00:10:40,159 --> 00:10:41,620 to outside attack. 278 00:10:43,365 --> 00:10:46,985 We've, led the way in characterizing QKD systems, 279 00:10:47,044 --> 00:10:49,044 the boxes that are, as you say, are 280 00:10:49,044 --> 00:10:50,105 already on the market. 281 00:10:51,605 --> 00:10:54,324 QKD, just to elaborate, is a way of 282 00:10:54,324 --> 00:10:55,304 generating cryptographic 283 00:10:55,684 --> 00:10:58,870 keys that are unbreakable because they're intrinsically random. 284 00:10:59,090 --> 00:11:01,910 They use the randomness of of quantum physics. 285 00:11:02,929 --> 00:11:04,629 They do it by generating 286 00:11:05,009 --> 00:11:07,750 pairs of photons that are randomly coded. 287 00:11:08,375 --> 00:11:11,195 So there's two levels of randomness going on, 288 00:11:11,815 --> 00:11:12,954 usually by polarization. 289 00:11:13,735 --> 00:11:16,054 And then the process can't be intercepted if 290 00:11:16,054 --> 00:11:17,434 they are single photons 291 00:11:17,975 --> 00:11:20,154 without destroying that information, without 292 00:11:20,779 --> 00:11:23,179 the two the sender and receiver knowing that 293 00:11:23,179 --> 00:11:24,879 there's someone trying to break in. 294 00:11:25,340 --> 00:11:26,480 So like you say, 295 00:11:26,940 --> 00:11:27,679 the sources, 296 00:11:28,220 --> 00:11:29,840 but even most of the detectors, 297 00:11:30,779 --> 00:11:32,399 are a are a point of vulnerability 298 00:11:33,464 --> 00:11:35,725 because you can you can blind, 299 00:11:36,985 --> 00:11:37,225 the, 300 00:11:38,584 --> 00:11:39,324 the detector 301 00:11:39,865 --> 00:11:42,184 by by shining a put a brighter source 302 00:11:42,184 --> 00:11:43,725 into it and then 303 00:11:44,105 --> 00:11:47,144 use your own source to, to spoof the 304 00:11:47,144 --> 00:11:47,644 system. 305 00:11:48,750 --> 00:11:50,769 That's only one. There's other vulnerabilities 306 00:11:51,950 --> 00:11:54,750 like, they don't actually use single photons. And 307 00:11:54,750 --> 00:11:57,070 at this point, they tend to be small 308 00:11:57,070 --> 00:11:59,070 bundles of photons. But if they use too 309 00:11:59,070 --> 00:12:01,790 many, it's possible to split enough of them 310 00:12:01,790 --> 00:12:02,290 off 311 00:12:02,674 --> 00:12:03,315 and and, 312 00:12:04,674 --> 00:12:06,774 and join in on the the key, 313 00:12:07,475 --> 00:12:08,375 key reception. 314 00:12:09,154 --> 00:12:11,815 So we went through all the potential vulnerabilities. 315 00:12:12,514 --> 00:12:14,355 I say we, not me personally. I'm not 316 00:12:14,355 --> 00:12:15,414 allowed in the lab. 317 00:12:15,870 --> 00:12:17,950 We went through all the potential vulnerabilities that 318 00:12:17,950 --> 00:12:19,570 had been identified in QKD, 319 00:12:20,269 --> 00:12:21,090 and we tested 320 00:12:21,470 --> 00:12:23,250 we tested existing systems 321 00:12:23,870 --> 00:12:26,029 against them. And we and we worked out 322 00:12:26,029 --> 00:12:26,529 as 323 00:12:26,910 --> 00:12:28,990 the the sort of criteria that would be 324 00:12:28,990 --> 00:12:31,514 needed in the standard, And we took that 325 00:12:31,514 --> 00:12:32,654 into Etsy, 326 00:12:33,674 --> 00:12:35,754 for the building of their QKD sis 327 00:12:36,315 --> 00:12:37,294 standards family. 328 00:12:38,715 --> 00:12:41,595 And and, John, Tim's already touched a little 329 00:12:41,595 --> 00:12:43,615 bit on the need to 330 00:12:44,610 --> 00:12:48,789 develop performance metrics and benchmarking for quantum computers. 331 00:12:49,169 --> 00:12:52,049 And I understand that NPL is leading, an 332 00:12:52,049 --> 00:12:52,549 initiative, 333 00:12:53,649 --> 00:12:54,629 in that direction. 334 00:12:55,409 --> 00:12:57,649 Why do we need these metrics, and and 335 00:12:57,649 --> 00:13:00,149 what are the challenges in creating them? 336 00:13:01,075 --> 00:13:04,054 There's there is more than one initiative underway. 337 00:13:05,235 --> 00:13:07,394 And the one that I I closest to 338 00:13:07,394 --> 00:13:09,315 is the way that it's been brought into 339 00:13:09,315 --> 00:13:10,535 the standards world. 340 00:13:11,554 --> 00:13:13,254 It's too early for, 341 00:13:14,059 --> 00:13:15,120 full standardization, 342 00:13:16,059 --> 00:13:17,740 but there is a there is a there's 343 00:13:17,740 --> 00:13:20,059 a real demand from the potential buyers of 344 00:13:20,059 --> 00:13:20,959 quantum computers 345 00:13:21,339 --> 00:13:23,339 to know what it is, what are their 346 00:13:23,339 --> 00:13:25,659 strengths, and how do they compare one against 347 00:13:25,659 --> 00:13:26,320 the other. 348 00:13:26,945 --> 00:13:28,565 But that is far from 349 00:13:28,945 --> 00:13:30,085 a a simple question. 350 00:13:30,465 --> 00:13:33,125 It's not a simple question with conventional computers, 351 00:13:33,345 --> 00:13:35,665 but it's even more difficult when we have 352 00:13:35,665 --> 00:13:36,485 no universal 353 00:13:37,024 --> 00:13:40,120 error corrected quantum computer. As Tim said, there 354 00:13:40,120 --> 00:13:40,620 are 355 00:13:40,959 --> 00:13:41,459 a 356 00:13:41,799 --> 00:13:42,940 a number of platforms, 357 00:13:43,799 --> 00:13:45,659 including superconducting qubits, 358 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:47,019 ion traps, 359 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,299 that are under consideration. 360 00:13:51,215 --> 00:13:53,774 In the early days of attempting to benchmark 361 00:13:53,774 --> 00:13:54,274 them, 362 00:13:54,735 --> 00:13:56,815 it was suggested that you could simply count 363 00:13:56,815 --> 00:13:58,815 the number of qubits and people will still 364 00:13:58,815 --> 00:13:59,715 put up graphs 365 00:14:00,254 --> 00:14:02,514 and say, my computer has 366 00:14:03,919 --> 00:14:06,559 48 or a 150 367 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:07,620 cubits in it. 368 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:10,399 And when it was it was realized that 369 00:14:10,399 --> 00:14:12,959 in terms of computing power, that wasn't enough. 370 00:14:12,959 --> 00:14:15,919 They moved to gate depth. How many how 371 00:14:15,919 --> 00:14:17,539 many gates, how many processes 372 00:14:17,985 --> 00:14:20,384 could your quantum processor go through before it 373 00:14:20,384 --> 00:14:21,365 lost the information? 374 00:14:22,304 --> 00:14:23,684 That too is too simplistic. 375 00:14:24,784 --> 00:14:25,524 And so, 376 00:14:27,184 --> 00:14:29,205 we're beginning to look at, 377 00:14:30,304 --> 00:14:32,085 at at more multidimensional 378 00:14:32,705 --> 00:14:33,205 aspects 379 00:14:33,610 --> 00:14:34,750 to hardware benchmarking. 380 00:14:35,610 --> 00:14:36,910 And at the same time, 381 00:14:37,690 --> 00:14:40,269 I'm trying to answer the question, if performance 382 00:14:40,410 --> 00:14:41,470 is what matters, 383 00:14:42,009 --> 00:14:44,750 surely, it's how quickly and how effectively 384 00:14:45,450 --> 00:14:46,190 your quantum 385 00:14:46,570 --> 00:14:47,070 processor 386 00:14:47,450 --> 00:14:49,704 can do a particular task. 387 00:14:50,964 --> 00:14:52,964 That, it turns out, isn't as simple a 388 00:14:52,964 --> 00:14:54,904 question as you might think either, 389 00:14:57,044 --> 00:15:00,004 partly because quantum processors are part of a 390 00:15:00,004 --> 00:15:00,450 stack 391 00:15:01,250 --> 00:15:03,029 in in a similar way to telecoms, 392 00:15:03,970 --> 00:15:06,049 and the error correction is happening in a 393 00:15:06,049 --> 00:15:07,669 multitude of different ways. 394 00:15:08,049 --> 00:15:10,290 But we're we're attacking that one as well, 395 00:15:10,290 --> 00:15:12,710 and and we're bringing the answers to these, 396 00:15:13,330 --> 00:15:14,149 these researches 397 00:15:14,955 --> 00:15:17,754 into the standards, particularly in SanSan, like the 398 00:15:17,754 --> 00:15:19,134 European standards bodies, 399 00:15:19,595 --> 00:15:22,634 and I see IEC ISO, the global standards 400 00:15:22,634 --> 00:15:24,415 bodies, where they're doing 401 00:15:24,875 --> 00:15:28,175 early stage standards. They're doing technical reports on 402 00:15:28,669 --> 00:15:29,329 the benchmarking 403 00:15:30,350 --> 00:15:33,470 systems that people have have come up with 404 00:15:33,470 --> 00:15:33,970 already. 405 00:15:35,470 --> 00:15:37,709 So so John and Tim, I I did 406 00:15:37,709 --> 00:15:40,289 my PhD many, many, many years ago, 407 00:15:40,715 --> 00:15:42,955 and I became a science journalist. But I 408 00:15:42,955 --> 00:15:44,554 often think about, you know, sort of an 409 00:15:44,554 --> 00:15:45,774 alternative universe 410 00:15:46,475 --> 00:15:48,894 where I could have done something else. 411 00:15:49,355 --> 00:15:51,934 And one thing that I've always found appealing 412 00:15:52,730 --> 00:15:55,049 is the idea of working at a place 413 00:15:55,049 --> 00:15:56,029 like NPL. 414 00:15:56,490 --> 00:15:58,029 I mean, it just sounds like, 415 00:15:58,569 --> 00:16:00,329 well, it doesn't sound like it. I know 416 00:16:00,329 --> 00:16:01,789 that people there are doing 417 00:16:03,129 --> 00:16:05,769 a vast, you know, sort of variety of 418 00:16:05,769 --> 00:16:09,254 really interesting research and working with industry and 419 00:16:09,554 --> 00:16:11,095 developing lots of, 420 00:16:11,475 --> 00:16:13,014 of of new technologies. 421 00:16:13,634 --> 00:16:15,875 So, you know, if if there's somebody out 422 00:16:15,875 --> 00:16:18,215 there who's just finished a PhD, 423 00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:22,679 How would you advise them in terms of, 424 00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:24,779 pursuing a career at NPL? 425 00:16:25,559 --> 00:16:26,379 What's available? 426 00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:28,840 So I think one of the things to 427 00:16:28,840 --> 00:16:31,740 first say is that measurement metrology 428 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:35,764 underpins almost everything everybody does. So there are 429 00:16:35,764 --> 00:16:37,764 lots and lots of fields of interest that 430 00:16:37,764 --> 00:16:40,084 you can you can work within. And as 431 00:16:40,084 --> 00:16:41,784 I mentioned, at the beginning, 432 00:16:42,964 --> 00:16:45,684 we've been using quantum for doing really, really 433 00:16:45,684 --> 00:16:47,610 amazing measurements for a long time. 434 00:16:48,089 --> 00:16:49,870 So we called that quantum metrology. 435 00:16:50,730 --> 00:16:52,329 And that knowledge has led us to be 436 00:16:52,329 --> 00:16:53,149 able to do metrology 437 00:16:53,529 --> 00:16:54,269 for quantum. 438 00:16:54,809 --> 00:16:56,589 So this is basic fundamental 439 00:16:56,889 --> 00:16:59,529 science. So if that's what drives people, there 440 00:16:59,529 --> 00:17:01,309 is in these emerging technologies, 441 00:17:01,625 --> 00:17:04,284 there's a requirement to do fundamental physics. 442 00:17:05,304 --> 00:17:05,804 But 443 00:17:06,184 --> 00:17:08,345 as you develop that, you get to play 444 00:17:08,345 --> 00:17:09,404 with all the applying, 445 00:17:10,105 --> 00:17:11,964 uses of that of that technology. 446 00:17:12,424 --> 00:17:13,944 So we get to work in lots and 447 00:17:13,944 --> 00:17:14,845 lots of fields, 448 00:17:15,750 --> 00:17:17,910 really help to enable things to actually really, 449 00:17:17,910 --> 00:17:19,529 really happen. So exposure 450 00:17:19,910 --> 00:17:22,630 to lots of brilliant people around the country, 451 00:17:22,630 --> 00:17:24,869 around the world, it's an it's an amazing 452 00:17:24,869 --> 00:17:26,250 opportunity for people. 453 00:17:27,494 --> 00:17:28,154 I would 454 00:17:28,615 --> 00:17:29,115 add. 455 00:17:29,575 --> 00:17:31,335 One of the things about coming here to 456 00:17:31,335 --> 00:17:33,494 NPL so like like you, Hamish, I did 457 00:17:33,494 --> 00:17:35,414 my PhD, and then I went off and, 458 00:17:35,894 --> 00:17:36,934 I actually worked, 459 00:17:37,255 --> 00:17:39,355 for the, Institute of Physics Publishing. 460 00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:42,700 That's my that's my first foray into, 461 00:17:43,720 --> 00:17:44,779 public publishing. 462 00:17:46,839 --> 00:17:48,679 And it suited me down to the ground. 463 00:17:48,679 --> 00:17:51,000 I really liked my time there, and it 464 00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:52,460 suited my way of working. 465 00:17:53,015 --> 00:17:54,075 Coming to NPL, 466 00:17:54,455 --> 00:17:56,375 having been there and having been in the 467 00:17:56,375 --> 00:17:57,674 standards world for 468 00:17:57,975 --> 00:17:58,795 twenty years, 469 00:18:00,535 --> 00:18:03,515 that what Tim's talking about, working on metrology, 470 00:18:04,215 --> 00:18:06,990 it really suits people who not just do 471 00:18:06,990 --> 00:18:09,470 proof of principle, which is largely what doing 472 00:18:09,470 --> 00:18:11,410 the PhD is, but love 473 00:18:11,950 --> 00:18:13,650 getting things down to 474 00:18:13,950 --> 00:18:15,009 that nth degree 475 00:18:15,309 --> 00:18:16,049 of of precision, 476 00:18:17,470 --> 00:18:19,534 which which is a is a very 477 00:18:19,835 --> 00:18:22,954 different mindset from you'll find almost anywhere else 478 00:18:22,954 --> 00:18:23,694 in the world. 479 00:18:24,075 --> 00:18:26,634 But that doesn't mean that's everyone at NPL 480 00:18:26,634 --> 00:18:28,974 because I they wouldn't have employed me otherwise. 481 00:18:30,329 --> 00:18:32,990 There there there's lots of different roles, 482 00:18:33,769 --> 00:18:34,909 within NPL 483 00:18:35,450 --> 00:18:36,909 other than working on 484 00:18:37,369 --> 00:18:37,869 metrology 485 00:18:38,569 --> 00:18:39,069 itself. 486 00:18:40,329 --> 00:18:42,329 And I'm I'm pleased that I've been taken 487 00:18:42,329 --> 00:18:44,829 on as a standards expert rather than 488 00:18:45,144 --> 00:18:47,005 as a an experimental physicist. 489 00:18:48,505 --> 00:18:50,744 And and I I should say that I'm 490 00:18:50,744 --> 00:18:52,904 guessing that it's it's not only people with 491 00:18:52,904 --> 00:18:54,125 PhDs in physics 492 00:18:54,505 --> 00:18:55,884 that you're looking for. 493 00:18:56,984 --> 00:18:58,204 Yeah. We're we're we're 494 00:18:58,609 --> 00:19:00,369 we're looking for all all people. And in 495 00:19:00,369 --> 00:19:02,470 fact, we have apprenticeship schemes where, 496 00:19:03,170 --> 00:19:05,170 you know, we we take people in and 497 00:19:05,170 --> 00:19:07,910 develop their skills. Engineers are really important. 498 00:19:08,769 --> 00:19:10,230 These people are sometimes 499 00:19:10,865 --> 00:19:12,805 more difficult to find than the PhD 500 00:19:13,825 --> 00:19:15,985 people. So there's lots of opportunities, but you 501 00:19:15,985 --> 00:19:18,065 need the support around it as well. Need 502 00:19:18,065 --> 00:19:20,725 the, people who need to understand intellectual property. 503 00:19:20,945 --> 00:19:23,365 The people who manage these highly complex, 504 00:19:24,289 --> 00:19:25,970 projects, especially when there are a lot of 505 00:19:25,970 --> 00:19:26,470 partners, 506 00:19:26,929 --> 00:19:27,429 etcetera. 507 00:19:27,890 --> 00:19:29,269 But I think the I mean, 508 00:19:29,890 --> 00:19:32,069 it's now quite recognized that 509 00:19:32,369 --> 00:19:34,369 you need to invest in this sort of 510 00:19:34,369 --> 00:19:34,869 infrastructure, 511 00:19:35,250 --> 00:19:36,869 you know, this measurement capability 512 00:19:37,424 --> 00:19:38,644 in order to actually 513 00:19:39,424 --> 00:19:41,424 allow these things to come to market, to 514 00:19:41,424 --> 00:19:43,045 give The UK the opportunity 515 00:19:43,345 --> 00:19:46,065 to have both growth in the GDP, but 516 00:19:46,065 --> 00:19:47,924 also look after its, security. 517 00:19:48,705 --> 00:19:51,184 And it's really good because The UK's national 518 00:19:51,184 --> 00:19:51,684 strategy 519 00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:54,640 quantum actually recognizes this and talks about it 520 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:56,099 as a really important mechanism. 521 00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:58,640 And I think that's something that's really important 522 00:19:58,640 --> 00:19:59,140 because 523 00:19:59,679 --> 00:20:00,819 metrology institutes 524 00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:04,659 have been the unsung heroes behind the scenes 525 00:20:05,204 --> 00:20:05,704 for 526 00:20:06,005 --> 00:20:09,224 decades and decade developing capability that enables 527 00:20:09,525 --> 00:20:10,025 trade, 528 00:20:10,484 --> 00:20:12,904 enables safety, enables so many things. 529 00:20:13,365 --> 00:20:14,585 But because it happens 530 00:20:14,884 --> 00:20:15,384 seamlessly, 531 00:20:16,085 --> 00:20:16,585 usually, 532 00:20:17,059 --> 00:20:19,400 then it's just invisible to most people. 533 00:20:19,859 --> 00:20:22,359 But now people recognize with these very complex 534 00:20:22,420 --> 00:20:25,059 technologies coming to market that for those to 535 00:20:25,059 --> 00:20:27,079 happen, you have to have good metrology. 536 00:20:28,914 --> 00:20:31,154 And Tim, we we've spoken a bit about 537 00:20:31,154 --> 00:20:34,194 NPL's connections with industry, but I would assume 538 00:20:34,194 --> 00:20:35,654 that you have very strong, 539 00:20:36,275 --> 00:20:38,214 connections with the academic world, 540 00:20:38,835 --> 00:20:41,255 in physics and and other related, 541 00:20:42,914 --> 00:20:44,220 subjects. Is that right? 542 00:20:44,859 --> 00:20:47,980 Yeah. I mean, we again, we have we're 543 00:20:47,980 --> 00:20:49,200 a reasonably big laboratory, 544 00:20:49,579 --> 00:20:51,419 but the amount of questions we get asked, 545 00:20:51,419 --> 00:20:53,740 you couldn't answer them all yourself. And so 546 00:20:53,740 --> 00:20:55,500 MPL doesn't go out there to try and 547 00:20:55,500 --> 00:20:57,894 reinvent what other people have done. It goes 548 00:20:57,894 --> 00:20:59,654 out there to try and collaborate with the 549 00:20:59,654 --> 00:21:01,035 best people around the country. 550 00:21:01,494 --> 00:21:03,654 In, in the quantum side, that will be 551 00:21:03,654 --> 00:21:05,115 with the quantum hubs, 552 00:21:05,494 --> 00:21:07,015 but people outside that, 553 00:21:07,414 --> 00:21:07,914 international, 554 00:21:08,615 --> 00:21:09,755 academia, etcetera. 555 00:21:10,599 --> 00:21:13,240 We've tried to identify where we have gaps 556 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,159 in our knowledge or The UK has gaps 557 00:21:15,159 --> 00:21:16,839 in its knowledge, and then we try to 558 00:21:16,839 --> 00:21:19,019 collaborate with the people who have those skills. 559 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:21,500 And 560 00:21:21,974 --> 00:21:24,315 I just wanna ask both of you, 561 00:21:25,174 --> 00:21:27,494 what, you know, what do you find most 562 00:21:27,494 --> 00:21:28,954 exciting about working 563 00:21:29,575 --> 00:21:30,075 in 564 00:21:30,454 --> 00:21:30,954 quantum 565 00:21:31,654 --> 00:21:34,454 metrology? Is it is it the the the 566 00:21:34,454 --> 00:21:36,930 pace of change and, you you know, the 567 00:21:37,410 --> 00:21:39,410 always having to keep up with the latest 568 00:21:39,410 --> 00:21:40,470 research? Or 569 00:21:41,330 --> 00:21:43,330 is it just the novelty that, you know, 570 00:21:43,330 --> 00:21:44,150 these these 571 00:21:44,930 --> 00:21:45,430 esoteric 572 00:21:46,049 --> 00:21:48,549 concepts of quantum physics can be 573 00:21:49,664 --> 00:21:50,404 turned into 574 00:21:50,705 --> 00:21:52,785 technologies? What, you know, what what gets you 575 00:21:52,785 --> 00:21:54,485 guys up, in the morning? 576 00:21:56,144 --> 00:21:58,144 I'd go with the first one. It's, it 577 00:21:58,305 --> 00:22:00,945 it's remarkable. I mean, I've my background was 578 00:22:00,945 --> 00:22:01,684 in optoelectronics 579 00:22:02,144 --> 00:22:02,884 and communications. 580 00:22:03,664 --> 00:22:05,045 And back in the nineties, 581 00:22:06,089 --> 00:22:08,170 you would go to conferences every year, and 582 00:22:08,170 --> 00:22:08,829 they would 583 00:22:09,130 --> 00:22:12,170 be making promises which were slightly better than 584 00:22:12,170 --> 00:22:14,730 previously. But there was no there was nothing 585 00:22:14,730 --> 00:22:15,230 groundbreaking 586 00:22:15,769 --> 00:22:18,134 about it. The physics was well known, and 587 00:22:18,214 --> 00:22:20,295 and they were really just solving engineering and 588 00:22:20,295 --> 00:22:21,515 manufacturing problems, 589 00:22:21,815 --> 00:22:23,815 which isn't easy, which is why I don't 590 00:22:23,815 --> 00:22:24,954 do it. That either. 591 00:22:26,055 --> 00:22:26,875 But now 592 00:22:27,255 --> 00:22:29,414 the the real progress and when one of 593 00:22:29,414 --> 00:22:31,319 the areas within quantum where 594 00:22:31,799 --> 00:22:34,119 progress has been massive in just the last 595 00:22:34,119 --> 00:22:35,259 two or three years 596 00:22:35,639 --> 00:22:37,659 is in, distributed entanglement 597 00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:40,279 where the the the test 598 00:22:41,079 --> 00:22:42,059 three years ago, 599 00:22:42,759 --> 00:22:45,019 the the first tests that you could send 600 00:22:45,765 --> 00:22:47,144 an entangled photon 601 00:22:47,445 --> 00:22:48,744 out over, 602 00:22:49,125 --> 00:22:51,625 say, 15 kilometers of fiber and 603 00:22:52,244 --> 00:22:54,184 and measurably still be entangled 604 00:22:54,884 --> 00:22:57,125 had just been done. And now there are 605 00:22:57,125 --> 00:22:59,144 test networks all over the world, 606 00:22:59,450 --> 00:23:01,549 which are getting ready for product 607 00:23:02,009 --> 00:23:04,910 to make to use quantum entanglement in in 608 00:23:05,210 --> 00:23:06,509 in networks at scale. 609 00:23:07,049 --> 00:23:09,549 That that sort of pace of change is, 610 00:23:10,250 --> 00:23:11,549 quite exciting, really. 611 00:23:12,250 --> 00:23:13,710 And what about you, Tim? 612 00:23:14,275 --> 00:23:16,934 So for me, I mean, it's it's truly 613 00:23:17,154 --> 00:23:19,315 a privilege to be part of working with 614 00:23:19,315 --> 00:23:22,115 so many talented people either at NPL or 615 00:23:22,115 --> 00:23:24,755 in academia and industry in The UK or 616 00:23:24,755 --> 00:23:25,255 international. 617 00:23:25,714 --> 00:23:27,654 You get to see so many different 618 00:23:28,035 --> 00:23:30,549 people. You get to see so many brilliant 619 00:23:30,549 --> 00:23:31,049 technologies. 620 00:23:31,669 --> 00:23:33,210 Last week, I was at CERN. 621 00:23:34,230 --> 00:23:36,230 You know, you get exposed to the things 622 00:23:36,230 --> 00:23:37,990 that you you know, when you're at university, 623 00:23:37,990 --> 00:23:41,049 you only ever dreamt about getting involved in. 624 00:23:41,190 --> 00:23:41,929 And yet 625 00:23:42,544 --> 00:23:45,184 through metrology and through working with a an 626 00:23:45,184 --> 00:23:46,964 organization that's very international, 627 00:23:47,585 --> 00:23:49,684 it's amazing what you can get involved in. 628 00:23:51,345 --> 00:23:54,304 Well, that's great. Thanks. Thanks, Tim and John, 629 00:23:54,304 --> 00:23:55,684 for coming on the podcast, 630 00:23:56,224 --> 00:23:56,724 today. 631 00:23:57,440 --> 00:23:58,819 No worries. Thanks, Janesh. 632 00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:10,259 That was NPL's Tim Pryor and John Devaney. 633 00:24:10,785 --> 00:24:12,725 Thanks to both of them for a fascinating 634 00:24:12,945 --> 00:24:13,445 conversation. 635 00:24:14,065 --> 00:24:17,105 I'm Hamish Johnston, and our producer is Fred 636 00:24:17,105 --> 00:24:17,605 Isles. 637 00:24:18,305 --> 00:24:21,605 This podcast is sponsored by the National Physical 638 00:24:21,664 --> 00:24:22,164 Laboratory, 639 00:24:22,785 --> 00:24:25,445 which retains copyright on this episode. 640 00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:27,779 NPL is The UK's 641 00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:29,299 National Metrology 642 00:24:29,840 --> 00:24:30,340 Institute. 643 00:24:31,039 --> 00:24:34,660 It provides cutting edge measurement science, engineering, 644 00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:35,859 and technology 645 00:24:36,480 --> 00:24:37,859 to underpin prosperity 646 00:24:38,160 --> 00:24:40,660 and quality of life in The UK. 647 00:24:41,505 --> 00:24:44,884 NPL bridges the gap between research and industry 648 00:24:45,265 --> 00:24:48,244 by providing the measurement science, facilities, 649 00:24:48,704 --> 00:24:49,605 and expertise 650 00:24:50,144 --> 00:24:51,365 needed to accelerate 651 00:24:51,744 --> 00:24:52,244 innovation 652 00:24:52,704 --> 00:24:54,404 from lab to market 653 00:24:54,785 --> 00:24:56,404 across various sectors, 654 00:24:57,110 --> 00:24:58,330 including quantum.