Q&A Epsiode: Weekly Goals-Setting, Grandparent Gifts, Division of Labor & More
In this all Q&A episode, Laura and Sarah answer seven questions, including their very first audio query (submit your own if you would like -- just visit the show notes page on Laura's blog for details!). Topics covered include setting personal weekly goals, navigating grandparent gifts (with an aside on the accumulation of 'stuff'), transitioning from one to two (or more) kids, and a fascinating "what if" question asking each whether they wished they had taken time off to stay home.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
<v Speaker 1>Hi. This is Laura Vandercamp. I'm a mother of five, 0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.200 <v Speaker 1>an author, journalist, and speaker. And this is Sarah Hartunger. 0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.400 <v Speaker 1>I'm a mother of three, a practicing physician and blogger. 0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.760 <v Speaker 1>On the side, we are two working parents who love 0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.279 <v Speaker 1>our careers and our families. Welcome to best of both worlds. 0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.360 <v Speaker 1>Here we talk about how real women manage work, family, 0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.720 <v Speaker 1>and time for fun, from figuring out childcare to mapping 0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.320 <v Speaker 1>out long term career goals. We want you to get 0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:35.960 <v Speaker 1>the most out of life. Welcome to best of both worlds. 0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.880 <v Speaker 1>This is Laura. This is episode one hundred and ninety six, 0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.080 <v Speaker 1>airing in early May twenty twenty one. This is going 0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.599 <v Speaker 1>to be an all mail bag episode, taking listener questions, 0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.920 <v Speaker 1>some people sent in via Instagram, some through email, even 0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.800 <v Speaker 1>an audio question. Now that Sarah has her really cool setup, 0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.840 <v Speaker 1>maybe you can just quickly remind listeners how they can 0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.600 <v Speaker 1>send those Yes. I embarked upon for my other podcast initially, 0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.480 <v Speaker 1>but then realized, of course it can serve both purposes. 0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.360 <v Speaker 1>So we're calling the recording right now. I guess no, 0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.360 <v Speaker 1>we will. We're gonna slice it in. You guys are 0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.920 <v Speaker 1>gonna get to hear it of course, so we'll be 0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.240 <v Speaker 1>airing the actual audio question, and if you'd like to 0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.959 <v Speaker 1>submit an audio question, just click on the speak icon. 0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.319 <v Speaker 1>I'll see if I can send it to Laura for 0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.559 <v Speaker 1>her to embed into her show notes. But I will 0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.600 <v Speaker 1>just to hedge our bets. I will remember on Tuesday 0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.600 <v Speaker 1>to also include it on my blog. So as this airs, 0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.839 <v Speaker 1>you can go to my blog post on the shoebox 0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.920 <v Speaker 1>dot com and they'll be a reminder of how to 0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.679 <v Speaker 1>submit an audio question. You just click on the speak 0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.080 <v Speaker 1>pipe icon and you can use whatever on your phone 0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.200 <v Speaker 1>or your computer, whatever recorder. The questions are limited to 0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.200 <v Speaker 1>ninety seconds because I don't currently have the pro version, 0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.080 <v Speaker 1>but pro tip, you could always extend your question by 0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.400 <v Speaker 1>leaving a second question if it really is longer than 0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.960 <v Speaker 1>ninety seconds, And honestly, most questions don't take longer than 0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.880 <v Speaker 1>ninety seconds to ask anyways, what I've learned so they 0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.800 <v Speaker 1>want to think about changing their business model, but until then, 0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.920 <v Speaker 1>it's a great way for you to do it at 0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.880 <v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds, and then you have to pay. Then I'm 0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.440 <v Speaker 1>going to have more a little bit more revenue, but yes, 0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.640 <v Speaker 1>we would welcome more. I think it's really fun to 0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.760 <v Speaker 1>actually hear voices, all right, well, then we could go 0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.799 <v Speaker 1>ahead and play that question. Then if you are set 0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.080 <v Speaker 1>up to do that, let's go for it. Hello Sarah, 0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.040 <v Speaker 1>Hi Laura. My name is Shweita and I've been listening 0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.800 <v Speaker 1>to the Best of Both Worlds since twenty eighteen and 0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.480 <v Speaker 1>I find it very enjoyable and insightful, so thank you 0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.240 <v Speaker 1>for the great content. One strategy that you've discussed in 0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.520 <v Speaker 1>the past is to plan the next week, and not 0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.000 <v Speaker 1>just for work goals, but also for personal goals. I've 0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.639 <v Speaker 1>always done weekly planning of my work goals, but a 0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.880 <v Speaker 1>few weeks ago I started planning my personal goals as 0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.520 <v Speaker 1>well on my Friday afternoon planning sessions. And while I 0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.000 <v Speaker 1>do a great job in planning and completing my work 0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.680 <v Speaker 1>related goals, my personal goals seem to have isc problem. 0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.800 <v Speaker 1>They're either overly ambitious creating a capsule wardrobe in a 0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.480 <v Speaker 1>week and I don't finish them, or extremely mundane and 0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.600 <v Speaker 1>they feel like a to do list, like you know, 0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.120 <v Speaker 1>changing out the bulb in the porch light and it 0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.560 <v Speaker 1>doesn't feel fulfilling. Then, so I end up feeling frustrated 0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.559 <v Speaker 1>at the end of the week instead of being satisfied. 0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.880 <v Speaker 1>So my question is how do I set the right 0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.440 <v Speaker 1>scope for my personal goals so that it feels like 0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.240 <v Speaker 1>an accomplishment and not like a bourden and not like 0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.679 <v Speaker 1>box checking. Any advice for setting the size of these 0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.880 <v Speaker 1>weekly personal goals would be great, Thank you very much. 0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.600 <v Speaker 1>All Right, So that question was about setting the right 0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.760 <v Speaker 1>level of goals for our weekly goals? Laura, do you 0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.400 <v Speaker 1>have thoughts on that? Yeah? Well, I mean, this is 0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:49.000 <v Speaker 1>obviously the challenge of estimating how much we can get 0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:53.920 <v Speaker 1>done taking into account what life is like. And what 0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:55.960 <v Speaker 1>I will say is this is very difficult. It's a 0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.920 <v Speaker 1>time estimation question in addition to a goal estimation question, 0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.760 <v Speaker 1>and time estimation is difficult. Many people do not know 0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.200 <v Speaker 1>how long things they do quite regularly take. I mean 0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.280 <v Speaker 1>we're even talking things like commuting to work. There are 0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.720 <v Speaker 1>people who don't actually know how long it takes them 0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.000 <v Speaker 1>to get to work. That seems a little silly, but 0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.120 <v Speaker 1>there are plenty of other things that people do all 0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.599 <v Speaker 1>the time and don't know how long they take. And 0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.720 <v Speaker 1>it's the same thing with setting goals. For the weak. 0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:27.120 <v Speaker 1>What constitutes a challenging but doable sort of week, I 0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:32.400 <v Speaker 1>would say aim low, and the reason is because if 0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.200 <v Speaker 1>you set lower goals and you get through all of it, like, 0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.680 <v Speaker 1>you are always free to go pick more stuff. Like. 0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.760 <v Speaker 1>There is no rule saying, well, okay, if you accomplish 0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.839 <v Speaker 1>everything by the end of Wednesday, you have to take 0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.320 <v Speaker 1>the weekend off. I mean you could, of course, but 0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.320 <v Speaker 1>you're obviously welcome to go find some other stuff then 0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.040 <v Speaker 1>to fill the rest of your week if you feel 0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.839 <v Speaker 1>it was an inadequate week in some way, shape or form. 0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.440 <v Speaker 1>But the more common sin is the other way that 0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.880 <v Speaker 1>people try to cram too much in and then they 0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.360 <v Speaker 1>don't get to it all, and then they feel discouraged. 0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.200 <v Speaker 1>And it's not just about the discouragement part of it. 0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.679 <v Speaker 1>It's that you might not have chosen the right stuff 0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.599 <v Speaker 1>to do first. If you don't really think through what 0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.440 <v Speaker 1>you're going to get through. You may have chosen stuff 0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.280 <v Speaker 1>that could have been done next week. You might have 0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.839 <v Speaker 1>chosen stuff that was not quite as urgent as the 0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.159 <v Speaker 1>stuff you didn't get to, and then you've brought yourself 0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.520 <v Speaker 1>all kinds of problems. So aim lower than you think 0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.080 <v Speaker 1>you're going to get to. Then see what happens. I 0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.560 <v Speaker 1>would suggest you know, any given day cannot accommodate more 0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:35.880 <v Speaker 1>than three, maybe five tasks that are not set appointments, 0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.800 <v Speaker 1>So that might be a good way to kind of 0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.040 <v Speaker 1>aim for like, if you've got four meetings, then set 0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.719 <v Speaker 1>yourself three other tasks around those meetings. If you've got 0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.080 <v Speaker 1>one meeting, maybe you could do more like five. But 0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.279 <v Speaker 1>if you have a good sense of how the week 0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.240 <v Speaker 1>is shaped like that, then you can allocate each goal 0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.359 <v Speaker 1>to a particular time and if it's like, wait, I 0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.119 <v Speaker 1>don't think that's going to fit, that's a good sign 0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.880 <v Speaker 1>that it's not going to fit. Yeah, so the time 0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.320 <v Speaker 1>sort of a modified time blocking approach is what you're suggesting. 0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.240 <v Speaker 1>It sounds like now this person specifically, and I apologize 0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.400 <v Speaker 1>because Laura was not able to hear the entire question 0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.880 <v Speaker 1>right now I summarized it. But they were asking about 0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.279 <v Speaker 1>personal goals in particular in addition to work goals, and 0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.400 <v Speaker 1>how to make sure that they're not like too trivial 0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.039 <v Speaker 1>so they just feel like little tasks but not too 0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.719 <v Speaker 1>much where they really overwhelmed themselves. And I don't have 0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.960 <v Speaker 1>a great answer other than trial and error. I mean, 0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.560 <v Speaker 1>if you pick a goal one week and it just 0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.160 <v Speaker 1>seems like too much, then think about whether that might 0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.200 <v Speaker 1>be a specific goal you want to divide into pieces. 0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.120 <v Speaker 1>For example, you guys know, I was working on doing 0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.719 <v Speaker 1>an organizing program of my home, and it quickly became 0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.719 <v Speaker 1>evident that doing one step every day was not going 0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.159 <v Speaker 1>to be doable for me. So I had to figure 0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.520 <v Speaker 1>that out by trial and error and then decided, you 0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:47.880 <v Speaker 1>know what, I'm going to do a couple of these 0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.960 <v Speaker 1>actions per week. And so I learned by doing that 0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.039 <v Speaker 1>that would be a meaningful amount for me that didn't 0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.640 <v Speaker 1>feel completely trivial, but wasn't overwhelming. So I'm not sure 0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.800 <v Speaker 1>we're entirely going to be able to answer this question 0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.680 <v Speaker 1>for you, except to give you permission that it's okay 0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.760 <v Speaker 1>to play with things and especially learn from the times 0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.800 <v Speaker 1>that you do choose too many things how you might 0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.400 <v Speaker 1>be able to break those town to make them more 0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.360 <v Speaker 1>manageable to fit the time frame of a week. Yeah, 0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.480 <v Speaker 1>I would say that on weekend days, I tend to 0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.600 <v Speaker 1>choose one or two things that I want to aim 0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.760 <v Speaker 1>for on the weekend, beyond kind of life maintenance of 0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.760 <v Speaker 1>these little personal goals I want to tackle more than that, 0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.200 <v Speaker 1>it's just not going to happen if you have a 0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.200 <v Speaker 1>busy life. I mean, that's just reality, and then maybe 0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.880 <v Speaker 1>one to two much smaller things for during the week 0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.800 <v Speaker 1>that you could tackle in the evenings. So that just 0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.720 <v Speaker 1>as a general rule of thumb and so apologies for 0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.400 <v Speaker 1>having gone on about work related time estimation not having 0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.520 <v Speaker 1>heard the actual question. Through the magic of podcasting, it's 0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.360 <v Speaker 1>going to get spliced in later, so now you know 0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:54.560 <v Speaker 1>how the sausage is made around here. That's although interesting. 0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.880 <v Speaker 1>Answering questions that people didn't ask is kind of a 0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.560 <v Speaker 1>time honored media training technique that when you learn how 0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.240 <v Speaker 1>to do, for instance, television or radio interviews, the goal 0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.360 <v Speaker 1>is always you know people will ask a question, but 0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.760 <v Speaker 1>you have kind of your set stuff that you also 0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.320 <v Speaker 1>want to say, and generally you can get to what 0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:14.920 <v Speaker 1>you want to say if you pay attention to people 0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.000 <v Speaker 1>who've done a lot of television, radio whenevers. I tend 0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.720 <v Speaker 1>to answer stuff that didn't get asked. That is very 0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.200 <v Speaker 1>interesting and definitely makes me think back to some of 0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.000 <v Speaker 1>our guest interviews, especially our more polished guests, where it's like, wow, 0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.080 <v Speaker 1>how did they work their book in there? Like I 0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.280 <v Speaker 1>asked about what they had for lunch? Yes, well, there 0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.839 <v Speaker 1>you go, but it's a tr question. Number two let's 0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.800 <v Speaker 1>move on, Sarah, how do you organize your reading life? 0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.000 <v Speaker 1>I think you should answer this because I basically do not, 0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.680 <v Speaker 1>so go for it all. Well, not organizing is a 0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.400 <v Speaker 1>method upon itself, so give yourself a little bit more credit. 0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.800 <v Speaker 1>So I do tend to have a rough plan of 0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.200 <v Speaker 1>what I'm going to read for a year. I know 0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:55.880 <v Speaker 1>that sounds like a lot. I've been doing it for 0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.560 <v Speaker 1>the last three years, and that doesn't mean that I'm 0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.000 <v Speaker 1>so First of all, let me tell you my reading 0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.440 <v Speaker 1>list making is definitely a testament to my satisficing nature. 0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.440 <v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's not like the absolute best curated list 0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.640 <v Speaker 1>I could possibly create of the books that were made 0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.640 <v Speaker 1>for me to read. But at the same time, if 0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.960 <v Speaker 1>I'm reading like a slew of really good books, then 0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.880 <v Speaker 1>to me, it doesn't matter if they're like the absolute 0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.200 <v Speaker 1>best book I could have found to you know, meet 0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.000 <v Speaker 1>some arbitrary goals. So I make these lists, and I 0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.240 <v Speaker 1>don't like totally be labor them. I just kind of 0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.440 <v Speaker 1>like have a little Apple Notes document and if I 0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.079 <v Speaker 1>hear of something, I'll put it on there, and then 0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.280 <v Speaker 1>I'll dig deep into Modern Missus, Darcy's Recommendations and some 0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.320 <v Speaker 1>other podcasts recommendations that I've been getting into. I've been 0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.840 <v Speaker 1>into the ten Things to Tell You podcast lately, and 0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.440 <v Speaker 1>then a lot of times she has a lot of 0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.400 <v Speaker 1>book wracks that sound fascinating to me, so I've been 0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.839 <v Speaker 1>adding some through that, and yeah, I'll have like a 0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.040 <v Speaker 1>rough list for the year, and then I change it, 0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.280 <v Speaker 1>like I mean, I just added a book, for example, 0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.680 <v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty one to my library whole list because 0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.440 <v Speaker 1>I had heard it on a podcasts that wasn't originally 0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.920 <v Speaker 1>on my list. So it is absolutely a flexible list 0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.480 <v Speaker 1>because I do think if you give yourself like a 0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.240 <v Speaker 1>very structured reading assignment, like if I was like, Okay, 0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.520 <v Speaker 1>the first two weeks of March, I will read this book, 0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.280 <v Speaker 1>Like of course I wouldn't want to read that book 0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.040 <v Speaker 1>at that time. But it's more like, oh, I have 0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.040 <v Speaker 1>a cornucopia of excellent titles to choose from for like 0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.400 <v Speaker 1>each quarter, and then I'll like move things around as 0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.880 <v Speaker 1>I see fit. But it means that I never have 0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.360 <v Speaker 1>a lack of ideas in terms of what to put 0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:22.920 <v Speaker 1>on my list and what to read. And I do 0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.000 <v Speaker 1>tend to have a nonfiction and a fiction going at 0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:26.840 <v Speaker 1>the same time because I read those at different times. 0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.800 <v Speaker 1>Nonfiction is usually morning and fiction is usually like any 0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640 <v Speaker 1>other time basically. And I also will say that I 0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:38.080 <v Speaker 1>make a point of kind of playing with and keeping 0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.520 <v Speaker 1>up to date my library hold list at least monthly, 0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:42.959 <v Speaker 1>usually more often because I'll get text from the library 0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:44.840 <v Speaker 1>that something has come in and that makes me, you know, 0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:46.640 <v Speaker 1>add things or want to change my list or put 0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.920 <v Speaker 1>put a hold on hold. As you can do. You 0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.520 <v Speaker 1>can get on the wait list and then decide, oh, 0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.199 <v Speaker 1>I don't actually want that book soon, and you can 0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.600 <v Speaker 1>like freeze the weight list and do all these kinds 0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.600 <v Speaker 1>of stuff. So that helps us well. So I typically 0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.319 <v Speaker 1>have books coming in, and I have a low threshold 0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.600 <v Speaker 1>for buying books, especially if the library doesn't have them 0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.960 <v Speaker 1>or I want to read them and they're like you know, 0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.760 <v Speaker 1>on person number one hundred in line and just go 0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.880 <v Speaker 1>ahead and click through and purchase. I'm a big fan 0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.680 <v Speaker 1>of buying books. You should definitely support authors and buy books, 0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.800 <v Speaker 1>but the library has to buy it too, so obviously 0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.040 <v Speaker 1>you know that's a way too showing that there's a 0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.000 <v Speaker 1>high demand. So requesting books from your library is another 0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.319 <v Speaker 1>way to support authors. And if they know there's long 0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.920 <v Speaker 1>hold lists, they may invest in extra copies. Definitely put 0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.280 <v Speaker 1>in a hold. You could put in a hold and 0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.120 <v Speaker 1>buy the book if as a way to double support 0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.319 <v Speaker 1>an author, that might be something you could do as well. 0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.680 <v Speaker 1>Look and see what's interesting coming out. Look at reviews 0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.160 <v Speaker 1>on Modern Missus Darcy, the Wall Street Journal's book reviews section. 0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.400 <v Speaker 1>You know, people I know have books coming out at 0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.720 <v Speaker 1>this point. I've been in not a terrible, not a 0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.400 <v Speaker 1>great reading place for a while, but I am reading, 0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.360 <v Speaker 1>as we've talked about, a chapter of war and Peace 0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:56.440 <v Speaker 1>every morning. So I have a big fiction thing going 0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.400 <v Speaker 1>over the course of the year, and then I'm most 0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.520 <v Speaker 1>of the rest of my reading is whatever nonfiction book 0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:07.200 <v Speaker 1>has caught my attention as of late. So I've recently 0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.560 <v Speaker 1>read Just Lahy her new book, The Addiction Inoculation, which 0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.040 <v Speaker 1>is fascinating. Some of our listeners might want to check 0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.719 <v Speaker 1>that out. She's a friend of kJ who's been on 0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.400 <v Speaker 1>the podcast a lot too. They have a podcast called 0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.400 <v Speaker 1>am Writing Together. But Jess talks about her you know, 0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.160 <v Speaker 1>recovery from alcoholism and this genetic history of hers that 0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.960 <v Speaker 1>she's done trying to not pass along to her sons. 0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.920 <v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the genetics you can't help, but to 0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.240 <v Speaker 1>how can you keep kids who have this history from 0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.360 <v Speaker 1>becoming addicts and self fascinating stuff? Anyway, So that's what 0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.360 <v Speaker 1>I was reading the other day. So that does sound fascinating. Cool. Well, 0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.839 <v Speaker 1>shall we take a short ad break? Yes, yeah, take 0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.360 <v Speaker 1>a short ad break and we will be back in 0:12:47.440 --> 0:13:02.200 <v Speaker 1>just a minute. Well, we are back with an all 0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.319 <v Speaker 1>mail bag episode taking listener questions. This one came in 0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:11.160 <v Speaker 1>through Instagram. How do you navigate gifts from grandparents? I 0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.160 <v Speaker 1>don't want lots of stuff, but don't want to upset them? 0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.520 <v Speaker 1>All right, Well, Sarah, you have you have thoughts on this. 0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.120 <v Speaker 1>I consider myself pretty lucky in this regard in that 0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.600 <v Speaker 1>I think both sets of grandparents are cognizant of the 0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.000 <v Speaker 1>fact that I don't want o flew of random stuff 0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.880 <v Speaker 1>cluttering the house, although we do, I mean we totally do, 0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.720 <v Speaker 1>by the way. Just don't get any idea that we 0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.840 <v Speaker 1>have this like uncluttered house, but just I guess not 0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.920 <v Speaker 1>to add to it supremely. And so they typically ask 0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.720 <v Speaker 1>and I don't know if I started like, I don't 0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.800 <v Speaker 1>know if I somehow who knows. Maybe it's just that 0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.400 <v Speaker 1>they listen to the podcast and read the blog. I 0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.680 <v Speaker 1>don't know that that's a strategy for everyone, but I 0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.240 <v Speaker 1>think you can make it known that you are, you know, 0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.040 <v Speaker 1>trying to reduce you have tons of plastic toys, for example, 0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.559 <v Speaker 1>or like you don't need any more Legos or whatever 0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.480 <v Speaker 1>the thing is, and you can provide suggestions because a 0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.360 <v Speaker 1>lot of times all grandparents want is to delight kids. 0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.680 <v Speaker 1>And if you say, hey, my kids love to have 0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.400 <v Speaker 1>a museum membership and you could take them like that 0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.880 <v Speaker 1>would be a wonderful grandparent gift, or even something like 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.560 <v Speaker 1>some kind of digital membership. These days, there's a lot 0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.720 <v Speaker 1>of gaming things if you don't want stuff and you 0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.880 <v Speaker 1>want more technological stuff, or we have gone to like 0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.000 <v Speaker 1>the Doodle Crate, which is like the art version of 0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.680 <v Speaker 1>the Kiwi Crate, which it does sound like a lot 0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.400 <v Speaker 1>of stuff because they're shipping stuff your house, but it's 0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.520 <v Speaker 1>all kind of like consumable stuff, like once you've completed 0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.040 <v Speaker 1>the project, then it's done and it's not taking them 0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.000 <v Speaker 1>space in your house. And I ask for those things 0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.760 <v Speaker 1>like when I'm asked what the kids want, I ask, 0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.440 <v Speaker 1>or I even volunteer, like, hey, if you need ideas 0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.680 <v Speaker 1>for X, Y or Z's birthday, they've been talking about this, 0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.320 <v Speaker 1>this or this. So I think the more that you 0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.760 <v Speaker 1>kind of in a positive way shape what you are 0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.760 <v Speaker 1>interested in getting, the more that should hopefully help prevent 0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.960 <v Speaker 1>a deluge. And I think in the the worst case scenario, 0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.600 <v Speaker 1>you can always keep something for a short amount of time. 0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.160 <v Speaker 1>You don't have to necessarily keep something forever just because 0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.960 <v Speaker 1>it's been gifted to you. You could regift it to 0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.120 <v Speaker 1>somebody else after a month of use, if it's taking 0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.480 <v Speaker 1>up half of your playroom or something like that. Yeah, 0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.080 <v Speaker 1>I would also say that. I mean, sometimes people get 0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.040 <v Speaker 1>a little bit overly obsessed with having zero clutter and 0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.560 <v Speaker 1>zero stuff, and I think that's an impossible goal when 0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.000 <v Speaker 1>you have small kids. I mean, I don't know what 0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.760 <v Speaker 1>exactly this person's threshold is, but you know, I had 0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.040 <v Speaker 1>a question on Instagram recently if somebody was like, oh, 0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.080 <v Speaker 1>I'd love to do puzzles with my kids, but I 0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.880 <v Speaker 1>don't want stuff in the house, And I'm like, uh, 0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.080 <v Speaker 1>they didn't want to have any puzzles or legos in 0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:46.760 <v Speaker 1>the house that they would do as a fun activity 0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.800 <v Speaker 1>with their kids because it might be stuff. I mean, 0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.600 <v Speaker 1>it's just I'm sorry, have your fun, Let the kids 0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.680 <v Speaker 1>have their fun. You deal with the clutter later. If 0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.480 <v Speaker 1>you want a house that's going to look like a 0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.600 <v Speaker 1>magazine like, you know, I'm sorry, it's just going to 0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.360 <v Speaker 1>not happen until the kids are older. And I think 0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.560 <v Speaker 1>we need to learn to let go a little bit 0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.160 <v Speaker 1>and be okay with that. Now. I'm not saying that 0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.200 <v Speaker 1>if you live in an eight hundred square foot apartment 0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.400 <v Speaker 1>and your grandparents get you this, you know, giant like 0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.360 <v Speaker 1>three set Barbie castle, like three Barbie castles in a 0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.760 <v Speaker 1>row or something like that, that might be problematic. But 0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.800 <v Speaker 1>you know, I think at least leaving yourself open to 0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.640 <v Speaker 1>a little bit of stuff is okay. And as Sarah said, 0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.840 <v Speaker 1>you can move it out after a while, after the 0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.640 <v Speaker 1>kids have played with it, if you want to move 0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.360 <v Speaker 1>on to something else. I think it's only the people 0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.760 <v Speaker 1>who like either haven't had kids or just have one 0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.840 <v Speaker 1>eight month old that have the fantasy of no stuff. 0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:45.400 <v Speaker 1>Like I think I had that fantasy, but it's untenable. 0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.760 <v Speaker 1>It's untenable. I would like to hear from someone I 0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.720 <v Speaker 1>don't know, well, maybe and it's okay, yeah, it's okay. No, 0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.720 <v Speaker 1>I mean I would say, like, don't not do puzzles 0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:57.640 <v Speaker 1>with your kids. Because the puzzle will be there. Like, 0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.560 <v Speaker 1>don't not build a lego set with your you know, preteen, 0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.000 <v Speaker 1>because then the legos will be there. This just seems 0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.520 <v Speaker 1>like a you know, strange way to organize your life 0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.240 <v Speaker 1>that you're so into not having clutter that you wouldn't 0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:14.600 <v Speaker 1>do things. I don't know anyway, Sarah, what tasks do 0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.719 <v Speaker 1>you find become equal with your partner most easily? And 0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.080 <v Speaker 1>as a sort of corollary to that that, I'm adding, 0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.440 <v Speaker 1>what are the things that you think are our hardest 0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.520 <v Speaker 1>to make equal or shouldn't be equal? I guess because 0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.159 <v Speaker 1>not everything has to be. I think the question was, 0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.280 <v Speaker 1>and this is probably my fault, what is the most 0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.399 <v Speaker 1>likely to become unequal? But I think we should answer 0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.480 <v Speaker 1>in the positive way. Okay, first, perhaps I don't know. 0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.639 <v Speaker 1>I always feel like when there's a very clear delineation 0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.720 <v Speaker 1>of I'm doing this and you're doing that, that that helps. 0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.639 <v Speaker 1>Like recently, our kids were going to do ice skating 0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.560 <v Speaker 1>and I was just and there was like an issue 0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.520 <v Speaker 1>where like we had to we had credit sort of 0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.720 <v Speaker 1>and I am like the kind of person who hates 0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.560 <v Speaker 1>asking for stuff from businesses, and my husband's like, well, 0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.320 <v Speaker 1>why it was a birthday party we didn't do. And 0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.800 <v Speaker 1>I'm like, great, you are totally in charge of ice skating. 0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.119 <v Speaker 1>Now I don't want anything to do with it, like 0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.280 <v Speaker 1>you call them, you work with them, whatever, And he 0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.680 <v Speaker 1>did it like it's fine, and of course he's always right. 0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.240 <v Speaker 1>They were like, oh, we're happy to you know, accommedy 0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.360 <v Speaker 1>your credit or whatever. But I just hate doing that anyway. Sorry, 0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.320 <v Speaker 1>that's a total digression, but I think that it helped that. 0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.200 <v Speaker 1>It wasn't like, oh, well you call and then I'll 0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.399 <v Speaker 1>do this. It was like, you're in charge of that. 0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.640 <v Speaker 1>And I think about like your kids and doctor's appointments. 0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.160 <v Speaker 1>I remember your husband typically well it's yeah, that's sort 0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.040 <v Speaker 1>of a mix. I mean with five, there's just a 0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.600 <v Speaker 1>lot of them who we have split them at different points, 0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.360 <v Speaker 1>like you know, having two kids go at one point 0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.440 <v Speaker 1>and he'll take that and two at another and I'll 0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.719 <v Speaker 1>take that. He tends to be more in charge of 0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:41.560 <v Speaker 1>dental related stuff, possibly because I would massively fall down 0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.680 <v Speaker 1>on the job. I have perhaps lower dental standards than 0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.280 <v Speaker 1>he does. So, for instance, Ruth, he's in charge of orthodontia. 0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.680 <v Speaker 1>Ruth has an expander. Now I don't even know how 0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.960 <v Speaker 1>to do it. He's been doing it every night. Now. 0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.280 <v Speaker 1>Of course that works because we're in a period of 0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.720 <v Speaker 1>time where we still work from home. But you know, again, 0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.360 <v Speaker 1>it's like when one person has totally different standards from another. 0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:06.879 <v Speaker 1>I guess she was sort of obvious. But he's like, well, 0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.280 <v Speaker 1>I want to take Sam in to, you know, get 0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.879 <v Speaker 1>him evaluated, because I think his lower teeth are crooked. 0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.399 <v Speaker 1>And I'm like, who cares if your lower teeth are crooked? 0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.679 <v Speaker 1>No one sees them anyway, I wouldn't have brought him in. 0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.520 <v Speaker 1>And so he's like, if it's a situation like that, 0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.320 <v Speaker 1>the party who cares more should probably do it. If 0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.800 <v Speaker 1>you evaluate the various spheres of life, you may find 0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.520 <v Speaker 1>out that there are certain things that one of you 0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.480 <v Speaker 1>cares more about than the other, you know, and some 0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:39.000 <v Speaker 1>of it obviously is gonna split probably stereotypical gender lines. 0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:40.760 <v Speaker 1>Like my husband tends to do more of the home 0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.639 <v Speaker 1>repair stuff. He's like, well, we I called the you know, 0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.680 <v Speaker 1>AC guys to get them to come in to service it. 0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.399 <v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh, that, yes, that, But you know, 0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.359 <v Speaker 1>then there's other stuff that like I'm pretty sure the 0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.760 <v Speaker 1>summer camp spreadsheet would not happen if it were not 0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:01.479 <v Speaker 1>me doing it. One thing that we have bound works 0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.119 <v Speaker 1>well is to also divide based on energy. So I 0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.320 <v Speaker 1>am basically terrible at night. I mean, when he's not here, 0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.280 <v Speaker 1>I by default have to handle it. And oddly I 0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.320 <v Speaker 1>think the kids know I'm terrible and kind of humor 0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.760 <v Speaker 1>me a little bit, so that helps. But when he 0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.920 <v Speaker 1>is here, he tends to put the kids to bed, 0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.199 <v Speaker 1>he deals with any shenanigans of kids getting out of 0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.679 <v Speaker 1>bed like he just knows my tolerance for that is 0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.119 <v Speaker 1>so bad that he just kind of does it. So 0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.640 <v Speaker 1>that is one also, I say, I would say positive 0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.040 <v Speaker 1>one that takes advantage of kind of natural differences in 0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.840 <v Speaker 1>our energy level at that time of day. Yeah, I'm 0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.040 <v Speaker 1>trying to split the sleep disruptions more evenly right now, 0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.280 <v Speaker 1>having some challenges with it. Although you know what I'll do, 0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.080 <v Speaker 1>I'll go sleep in the guest room. And so then 0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.160 <v Speaker 1>Michael is in the room with Henry in the closet. 0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:52.960 <v Speaker 1>Right some nights, but I would love to sleep past six. 0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.720 <v Speaker 1>And so last night I was in the gas room 0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.200 <v Speaker 1>and I'm like, please give me till six, And so 0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.680 <v Speaker 1>they appear in my room and he's like, no, it's 0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.240 <v Speaker 1>morning and he has to be the baby. And then 0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:04.960 <v Speaker 1>I was like, let me just go look at the clock. 0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.080 <v Speaker 1>It was it was five forty five, so it was close, 0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.240 <v Speaker 1>but it was not six. I was just like, come on, like, 0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:18.320 <v Speaker 1>couldn't go fifteen minutes? Two more minutes. I do feel 0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.800 <v Speaker 1>like and this since the asker did ask about what 0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.480 <v Speaker 1>quickly becomes unequal, unfortunately I always felt like, and this 0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.680 <v Speaker 1>is not his fault, but I felt like baby care 0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.520 <v Speaker 1>was just typically where we would fall apart, partly because 0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.359 <v Speaker 1>you know, if you are nursing and that is the 0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.800 <v Speaker 1>most easy, kind of reliable way to soothe your baby, 0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.080 <v Speaker 1>then only one person's able to do that, and then 0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.840 <v Speaker 1>sometimes that just sort of extends over to like you 0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.199 <v Speaker 1>just end up being the baby wrangler. So there have 0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.199 <v Speaker 1>been times when I have had to say, like, and 0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.600 <v Speaker 1>this is more applicable when our kids were younger, but 0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.840 <v Speaker 1>I would just be like, I have been with the 0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.840 <v Speaker 1>one year old the entire day, and you've been doing 0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.919 <v Speaker 1>fun stuff with the big kids, and we need to 0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.080 <v Speaker 1>like consciously trade. And then he does and he's like, oh, yeah, 0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.280 <v Speaker 1>you're right, But I think that would be a natural 0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.639 <v Speaker 1>one where we tend to kind of fall apart, and 0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.920 <v Speaker 1>that's not our intention, but it just kind of happens, 0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.600 <v Speaker 1>or it used to happen exactly. But you know, having 0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.680 <v Speaker 1>discussions about it always good. I mean, obviously this could 0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.280 <v Speaker 1>be a topic of a whole episode, but you know, 0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.600 <v Speaker 1>I think in general, making sure that you are aware 0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.200 <v Speaker 1>also of what your partner is doing, because this does 0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.680 <v Speaker 1>happen sometimes. As you know, our past guest Tiffany Doufu 0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.359 <v Speaker 1>talked about in her book that she and her husband 0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.000 <v Speaker 1>made the list of the things that she were doing. 0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:36.880 <v Speaker 1>You know, she'd made the list first, and it's like, oh, 0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:38.640 <v Speaker 1>I'm doing fifty things and you're doing too, and it's 0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.560 <v Speaker 1>been like, well, he could list fifty things that she 0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.679 <v Speaker 1>hadn't even thought of, and so it was you know, 0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.240 <v Speaker 1>there are there are things that happen like our bike 0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.199 <v Speaker 1>tires get you know, inflated, balls get inflated. You know, 0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.439 <v Speaker 1>plants appear in the backyard. Like these are just things 0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.080 <v Speaker 1>that happen and I don't even think about it. And 0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.000 <v Speaker 1>so you know I could then say like, oh, well, god, 0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.080 <v Speaker 1>you know, why was I up at five forty five 0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:03.679 <v Speaker 1>instead of six? I mean, I think it's because he 0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.440 <v Speaker 1>was up since four, like he was up with the 0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.640 <v Speaker 1>baby since four gave him to me at five forty five, 0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.560 <v Speaker 1>like apparently, you know we gave them to that, but 0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.439 <v Speaker 1>it was you know, it's just you want to make 0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.320 <v Speaker 1>sure that before you think things are terribly unequal, you 0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.959 <v Speaker 1>take a good look at what is really happening and 0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.040 <v Speaker 1>see what they think might be unequal too. And I'm 0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.120 <v Speaker 1>glad you mentioned dropped the ball. That is my favorite 0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.000 <v Speaker 1>Division of Labor parent book, I think because you can 0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.560 <v Speaker 1>hear the love and their relationship as she talks about it, 0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.080 <v Speaker 1>and it has a certain playfulness, but at the same 0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.760 <v Speaker 1>time it's like really powerful. So you should have your 0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.520 <v Speaker 1>partner and yourself read that. Apparently in their case, he 0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.280 <v Speaker 1>was the one getting up with their baby all the time, 0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.520 <v Speaker 1>like she slept really deeply. So there you go, splits 0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.919 <v Speaker 1>differently different ways, all right. So our next question is 0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:55.159 <v Speaker 1>navigating the transition from one to two kids. So Sarah 0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.720 <v Speaker 1>was joking about this. We have a particular they're sort 0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.840 <v Speaker 1>of ongoing best of both worlds jokes, and we always 0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.840 <v Speaker 1>laugh about fathers who make the joke whenever their kid 0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.719 <v Speaker 1>they're going from two to three of like, oh well, 0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.720 <v Speaker 1>we're going from man to man. To zone defense. It's like, well, 0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.440 <v Speaker 1>that implies that you never had both two kids on 0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:17.080 <v Speaker 1>your own ever, because if you ever say that, you 0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.760 <v Speaker 1>were already doing zone defense, right, like, so like, thank 0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.359 <v Speaker 1>you for sharing with us that you have never had 0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.879 <v Speaker 1>your two children to yourself. But okay, yeah, so you 0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.520 <v Speaker 1>could make that joke. I love it. I love it. It 0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.479 <v Speaker 1>It is a best of both worlds trope or something 0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.800 <v Speaker 1>to have a little bit of snark about that particular statement. 0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.040 <v Speaker 1>So yes, I agree, I do feel like so, you know, 0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.119 <v Speaker 1>Laura wrote, oh, we could talk about two to three 0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.640 <v Speaker 1>or three to four or four to five. I'm like, well, 0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.439 <v Speaker 1>I don't know the latter couple of those, but I 0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.600 <v Speaker 1>found zero to one the hardest by far, because all 0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.800 <v Speaker 1>of a sudden, your life is not about you. It's 0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.719 <v Speaker 1>about many other things. And one to two the second hardest, 0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.040 <v Speaker 1>and two to three the third hardest. So maybe it 0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.919 <v Speaker 1>does keep getting eat Maybe the answers just have lu 0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.560 <v Speaker 1>and lots of kids it don't get easier. But actually, 0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.800 <v Speaker 1>to me, there's a really big difference between adding a 0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.760 <v Speaker 1>child when you have like a three or four year 0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.360 <v Speaker 1>old and then adding a child when you have say 0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.400 <v Speaker 1>like an eighteen month old or a twenty month old. 0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.760 <v Speaker 1>I did just say, give yourself a break if you 0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.399 <v Speaker 1>were going to have a baby and toddler, and know 0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.600 <v Speaker 1>that that time period is short because your toddler is 0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.560 <v Speaker 1>quickly going to age out to preschooler and things will 0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.920 <v Speaker 1>get a little bit better and then your baby will 0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.760 <v Speaker 1>be a toddler. You won't have a screaming new bore 0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.920 <v Speaker 1>like things are going to get better, but hire the help, 0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.119 <v Speaker 1>give yourself a break. Don't expect that things are going 0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.320 <v Speaker 1>to be perfect or easy. Like I personally found that 0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.760 <v Speaker 1>to be a very challenging time. And it wasn't the 0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.000 <v Speaker 1>two kids particularly, it was twenty two month old and 0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.800 <v Speaker 1>zero year old, or like twenty six month old and 0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.320 <v Speaker 1>six month old or whatever you know we had. So again, 0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.600 <v Speaker 1>the age spacing is going to play a role, and 0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.000 <v Speaker 1>know that that's going to be temporary because they're not 0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.639 <v Speaker 1>going to stay both tiny babies and toddlers forever. And 0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.359 <v Speaker 1>that is the time to ask for help, whether that 0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:01.160 <v Speaker 1>is from friends, family members, or people that you employ. Yeah, 0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.000 <v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say I don't even really have 0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:07.120 <v Speaker 1>any many memories of when Jasper was for Sam had 0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:08.919 <v Speaker 1>just turned two and Ruth was a baby. I mean 0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.480 <v Speaker 1>I clearly that time happened, but it was just a 0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.400 <v Speaker 1>you know, you get through it one way or the other, 0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.760 <v Speaker 1>and to recognize that that is probably not going to 0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.159 <v Speaker 1>be your most relaxing period of life. And if you have, 0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.600 <v Speaker 1>for instance, two under two or two under three, two 0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.239 <v Speaker 1>under two and a half, whatever, I mean, these are 0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.840 <v Speaker 1>these are just really really challenging times. Yeah, the baby 0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.040 <v Speaker 1>is actually you can put the baby down and like, 0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.200 <v Speaker 1>especially if the baby isn't mobile, they're not going to 0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.840 <v Speaker 1>go anywhere, like they're not going to get into trouble, 0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.320 <v Speaker 1>So you might be better off focusing on your two 0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.080 <v Speaker 1>year old at that point and you know, viewing that 0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.000 <v Speaker 1>that is the more mediate pressing issue and the baby 0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.480 <v Speaker 1>will then command more time later in life when that's happened, 0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.919 <v Speaker 1>and get very good at like nursing while walking around. 0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.359 <v Speaker 1>That was my other thing. Like you have this nice 0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.040 <v Speaker 1>idea of people with first time children. They're like, I'm 0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.359 <v Speaker 1>in my chair with my feet propped up and my 0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.480 <v Speaker 1>pillow and my you know, water on one side and 0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.720 <v Speaker 1>the stop watch so I know how long I'm on 0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.840 <v Speaker 1>each side. And then it's like when you have a 0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.760 <v Speaker 1>second kid, you're just like I am cooking dinner and 0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.520 <v Speaker 1>watching a toddler while nursing. So just like run with that, 0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.919 <v Speaker 1>you get very good at it. I don't think I 0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.879 <v Speaker 1>could ever do that, but yes, that sounds awesome. But 0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:23.639 <v Speaker 1>I did a lot of sit on the floor and 0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.239 <v Speaker 1>play with toddler while nursing. Yes, exactly. And you can 0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.159 <v Speaker 1>always ignore the little tiny one for a brief period 0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.800 <v Speaker 1>because they're not going to remember true, true, whereas the 0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.000 <v Speaker 1>bigger one is all right, Sarah. So this next question 0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.119 <v Speaker 1>is particularly for you. How do you save energy for 0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.320 <v Speaker 1>after kid bedtime? This person says, I'm so often falling 0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.760 <v Speaker 1>asleep and get nothing done. Is it for me? Because 0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.320 <v Speaker 1>I don't have any good answer to this, I think 0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.920 <v Speaker 1>it's for you. You're more likely to actually, well, yes, okay, 0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.520 <v Speaker 1>I will. I will just say that I don't have 0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.480 <v Speaker 1>a great answer for this because I don't have a 0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.760 <v Speaker 1>lot of energy after kid bedtime. I set my sights 0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.120 <v Speaker 1>really low in terms of how much I am going 0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.920 <v Speaker 1>to do or experience. If I get thirty to sixty 0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.439 <v Speaker 1>minutes to either read or hang out with my husband, 0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.959 <v Speaker 1>then that is a win. I do get more on 0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.600 <v Speaker 1>weekends because I tend to sleep in, and then I'm 0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.200 <v Speaker 1>less tired. But you know, the flip side of getting 0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.600 <v Speaker 1>up early is you can't then stay up till midnight. 0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.359 <v Speaker 1>I mean maybe some people can, but I definitely cannot. 0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.840 <v Speaker 1>So I'm usually in bed by nine thirty to ten, 0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.080 <v Speaker 1>and my kids go to bed at like eight thirty 0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.199 <v Speaker 1>to nine. So you do the math. There's not a 0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.000 <v Speaker 1>lot of window in there, and you can imagine that's 0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.520 <v Speaker 1>not a super high energy window either, So I think 0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.960 <v Speaker 1>it's okay if that's not a time you get a 0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.920 <v Speaker 1>lot done. I think being realistic and knowing that, you 0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.080 <v Speaker 1>know what, that's my thirty minutes of wine down time. 0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.600 <v Speaker 1>If that's all you really have, then then maybe that's okay. 0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.000 <v Speaker 1>Maybe that's your quote unquote season right now. Yeah. Well, 0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.880 <v Speaker 1>and Sarah Sarah has chosen to put her personal time 0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.400 <v Speaker 1>in the early morning, which is an option like if 0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.280 <v Speaker 1>you don't have any energy at the end of the day, 0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.920 <v Speaker 1>but you do in the morning, then consciously use the 0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.240 <v Speaker 1>morning as me time, Like you don't have to only 0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.920 <v Speaker 1>do me time at night after your kids go to bed. 0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.719 <v Speaker 1>I mean, it's obviously convenient time for it for many people, 0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.360 <v Speaker 1>but you may in fact have the energy to do 0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.040 <v Speaker 1>sort of more effortful things in the morning, like Sarah 0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.000 <v Speaker 1>doing her workout in the morning, doing her blog writing, 0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.280 <v Speaker 1>doing some reading in the morning, doing your meditation the 0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.840 <v Speaker 1>way we could listen through Sarah's extensive morning routine. You know, 0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.880 <v Speaker 1>that's all stuff that would for many people be a 0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.360 <v Speaker 1>lot harder to do at night. Like what we do 0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.160 <v Speaker 1>with our free time at night tends to be more 0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.920 <v Speaker 1>watching TV because you know that's nobody has that much 0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.880 <v Speaker 1>energy at night, even if they tend to think they do. 0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.480 <v Speaker 1>I think it does help, though, to be clear about 0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.800 <v Speaker 1>how much time is there. So, for instance, if you 0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.160 <v Speaker 1>aren't going to go to bed until let's say ten 0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.520 <v Speaker 1>thirty for whatever reason, that is the time you have 0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.640 <v Speaker 1>said as your normal weeknight bedtime, and you put your 0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.280 <v Speaker 1>kids to bed I don't know eight, then you do, 0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.680 <v Speaker 1>in fact have two and a half hours, and it 0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.320 <v Speaker 1>helps to know what that amount of time is and 0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.680 <v Speaker 1>then to have some sort of plan for it. I'm 0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.440 <v Speaker 1>not saying like you need to, you know, set every 0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.520 <v Speaker 1>minute or schedule like you would during the day, like 0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.240 <v Speaker 1>every fifteen minutes. I've got appointments for these sorts of things, 0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.800 <v Speaker 1>and send your spouse like an outlook invite for watching 0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.959 <v Speaker 1>a show, but Knowing that you might have two hours 0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:22.959 <v Speaker 1>before you need to get ready for bed can encourage 0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:24.880 <v Speaker 1>you to think a little bit more mindfully of like, well, 0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.640 <v Speaker 1>what could I do in two hours? And the good 0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.120 <v Speaker 1>news is that that's like enough to do a lot. 0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.440 <v Speaker 1>I mean, you could watch a movie on a weeknight 0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.560 <v Speaker 1>like that might feel if you were just thinking about it, 0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.120 <v Speaker 1>that would feel sort of irresponsible, right, But you know, 0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.160 <v Speaker 1>if you know you have two hours, like you can 0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.840 <v Speaker 1>in fact do that. Or you could, you know, set 0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.800 <v Speaker 1>a phone call with a friend, like we're going to 0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.880 <v Speaker 1>talk on Thursday night after the kids go to bed, 0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:48.640 <v Speaker 1>and then you know that's coming up and you'd look 0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.280 <v Speaker 1>forward to it. Like, if you have things you're looking 0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.920 <v Speaker 1>forward to, it can be a little bit easier to 0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.360 <v Speaker 1>sort of manage your energy and preserve a little bit 0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.480 <v Speaker 1>of your energy for that knowing that good stuff is 0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.720 <v Speaker 1>coming up. Now. If you don't have anything you're looking 0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.800 <v Speaker 1>forward to do, well, then it's a little bit harder 0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.400 <v Speaker 1>to manage your energy and to store it towards that 0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.800 <v Speaker 1>evening too. But if you know you don't have any energy, 0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.760 <v Speaker 1>you may as well just go to bed and then 0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.640 <v Speaker 1>wake up earlier and do whatever it was you were 0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.160 <v Speaker 1>going to do in the morning. Yeah, And I know 0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.400 <v Speaker 1>we've had some guests on that are all about their 0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.160 <v Speaker 1>second shift and working late at night. And if that 0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.680 <v Speaker 1>works for some people, that's wonderful. But I also don't 0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.440 <v Speaker 1>think it's a requirement to be, at least in my experience, 0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:36.160 <v Speaker 1>a reasonably successful employed female with a family that enjoys 0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.600 <v Speaker 1>both life and family time. I don't feel like I 0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.400 <v Speaker 1>would get much done that was of any substance if 0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.320 <v Speaker 1>I did try to force myself to work at night. 0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.000 <v Speaker 1>And I have friends who do, and then I have 0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:51.040 <v Speaker 1>friends who absolutely never do, And so I think sometimes 0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.720 <v Speaker 1>the myth that that's kind of a requirement can be 0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.320 <v Speaker 1>a little dangerous if you are going to do the 0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.960 <v Speaker 1>split shift, Like if you know that there are certain 0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.480 <v Speaker 1>tasks you of left for the evening because you've made 0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.000 <v Speaker 1>a conscious choice to leave work earlier, which remember that 0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.080 <v Speaker 1>is the reason you do a split shift, is that 0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.000 <v Speaker 1>you have left work earlier than you otherwise would have 0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.160 <v Speaker 1>and are moving that time to the evening. Have a 0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.360 <v Speaker 1>list of what you intend to do again. This is 0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.120 <v Speaker 1>going to help with managing your energy too. It's not 0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.480 <v Speaker 1>like I'm going to get through a thousand email backlog 0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.560 <v Speaker 1>between eight and ten, Like, no, you are not, but 0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:24.920 <v Speaker 1>if you have, Okay, I need to send responses to 0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:29.280 <v Speaker 1>these three things, send out the minutes for my meeting 0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.200 <v Speaker 1>that is tomorrow at nine am, and then review the 0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.360 <v Speaker 1>notes for the meeting that then happens at ten. Like 0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.840 <v Speaker 1>those things, you can get through in that shift. And 0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.520 <v Speaker 1>so if you have that list of what needs to happen, 0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.040 <v Speaker 1>then you will be able to manage your energy to 0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:43.880 <v Speaker 1>know to get through that and know that when you're done, 0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.200 <v Speaker 1>you're done, and hopefully be done enough earlier that you 0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.240 <v Speaker 1>can still watch a show or do something else fun 0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.840 <v Speaker 1>for thirty minutes in there. All right, Sarah, do you 0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.560 <v Speaker 1>ever wish you had a few years to experience stay 0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.320 <v Speaker 1>at home mom life? Thought this was kind of an 0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:03.400 <v Speaker 1>interesting question that the Yeah, me too. I thought it 0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.479 <v Speaker 1>was a fun question. It did make me stop and 0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.440 <v Speaker 1>think for a minute, and I was like, well, I 0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.920 <v Speaker 1>guess I could have done that. Like, you know, we 0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:16.000 <v Speaker 1>would have survived quite fine if I had chosen to 0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:20.080 <v Speaker 1>do that, And I probably could even have re entered 0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.600 <v Speaker 1>the workforce and done fine as well. From a career perspective. 0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.000 <v Speaker 1>That is one nice thing about being a physician. You 0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.800 <v Speaker 1>can keep your board certification, and if you primarily want 0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.920 <v Speaker 1>to do a clinical job, you can take a little 0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:35.000 <v Speaker 1>bit of time off and go back. So this actually 0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.400 <v Speaker 1>wasn't as much as theoretical as it sounded. I was like, 0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.200 <v Speaker 1>well it could have been. I think that it sounds nice, 0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.360 <v Speaker 1>like I'm picturing myself ticking walks with my kids like, 0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.160 <v Speaker 1>but then if I actually placed myself into that reality, 0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.440 <v Speaker 1>it would mean not having like somebody to help with 0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.000 <v Speaker 1>childcare and housework and stuff like that. So I would 0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:59.800 <v Speaker 1>have been doing a lot of that, and I know, 0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:02.960 <v Speaker 1>like the societal answers, I'm I'm like supposed to have 0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.160 <v Speaker 1>wanted that or like be really sad that I didn't 0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.839 <v Speaker 1>experience that. But I guess the only thing I might 0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:11.520 <v Speaker 1>have done might have done if I could have like 0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.880 <v Speaker 1>magically known that everything would have been fine, is not 0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.040 <v Speaker 1>to ever have had to pump to just stay with 0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.640 <v Speaker 1>my babies for twelve months. But that's like a maternity leave. 0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.920 <v Speaker 1>That's that's like a Norwegian maternity that's not being a 0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.719 <v Speaker 1>stay at home mom. Yes, I would have taken if 0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:26.880 <v Speaker 1>I could have, I would have taken a Norwegian maternity leave. 0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:28.440 <v Speaker 1>Let me let me just make that clear if that 0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.839 <v Speaker 1>had been an option, I think I would have found 0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.520 <v Speaker 1>that to be a nice balance. But I'm pretty sure 0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.200 <v Speaker 1>that by six months in I'd have fifteen other projects 0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.840 <v Speaker 1>I wanted to do, because I don't. I just don't 0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.879 <v Speaker 1>know if I would have been happy not doing it, 0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.920 <v Speaker 1>and by twelve months I would have been incredible. I 0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.200 <v Speaker 1>think I would have been very, very very ready to 0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.719 <v Speaker 1>get back to my own kind of autonomous work not 0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.399 <v Speaker 1>at home. So so I guess my answer is yes 0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.680 <v Speaker 1>and no. But I I mean I could, like I 0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.719 <v Speaker 1>sort of answered my own question, like in theory, I 0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.560 <v Speaker 1>could have done that, and I didn't, So I guess 0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.279 <v Speaker 1>I didn't want to. Now do we all wish we 0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.200 <v Speaker 1>could live our lives like ten times and experience it 0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.880 <v Speaker 1>all types of different ways and see what was fun? Like? Sure, 0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.680 <v Speaker 1>but we don't get to Sadly, Yeah, it's a nice 0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.200 <v Speaker 1>idea though, be a good sci fi book. Sarah and 0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.640 <v Speaker 1>I have both kind of chosen not to do that. 0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:18.879 <v Speaker 1>So in the sense of like, did we ever wish 0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.920 <v Speaker 1>we could experience, Well, no, because we chose not to write, 0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.400 <v Speaker 1>And so that's kind of I mean the nature of 0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.160 <v Speaker 1>that question, right, And it's also like I'm not sure 0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.600 <v Speaker 1>what would be so incredibly different from the experience I've had. 0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.839 <v Speaker 1>I mean, because I've been with my children on enough 0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.839 <v Speaker 1>days that I am quite aware of what's involved in 0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.640 <v Speaker 1>caring for them. You know, I have had many a 0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.239 <v Speaker 1>Tuesday when I've not been working for some reason or another, 0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.040 <v Speaker 1>and I have done stuff with the kids, like I've 0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.200 <v Speaker 1>had weekends and stuff. I've mean there quite a bit 0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.920 <v Speaker 1>I'm at home, so it's you know, not particularly some 0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.560 <v Speaker 1>world that I feel like I've missed a huge amount 0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.480 <v Speaker 1>on in my feeling, I've gotten to do a lot 0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.440 <v Speaker 1>of that really cool stuff that might have been, you know, 0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.319 <v Speaker 1>done as a stay at home mom, only I've also 0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.640 <v Speaker 1>gotten to have a really cool career too. So I 0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.799 <v Speaker 1>guess my answer is now, I don't wonder what it 0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.680 <v Speaker 1>would be like, because that's not what we've chosen to do. Well, 0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.400 <v Speaker 1>this has been best of both worlds, Sara, unless you 0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.560 <v Speaker 1>have something else you want to add to that, No, 0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:23.279 <v Speaker 1>I just think that was such a fun question. So 0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.719 <v Speaker 1>thank you for asking it. Yeah, thank you for asking that, 0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.880 <v Speaker 1>and to our listeners like you have also permission not 0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.680 <v Speaker 1>to have the feeling that you know you've missed it. 0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.320 <v Speaker 1>I know there's this sort of idea that you're supposed 0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.000 <v Speaker 1>to be like guilty or wistful or whatever, and if 0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.239 <v Speaker 1>you're not, you're not like I mean, I'm sure many 0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.759 <v Speaker 1>people have experienced a great amount of time with their kids. 0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:43.719 <v Speaker 1>That's the whole thing. We say. The best of both 0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:45.600 <v Speaker 1>worlds is like, even if you are working a full 0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.080 <v Speaker 1>time job, there is a lot of other time that 0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.200 <v Speaker 1>you experience with your family as well, so it's not 0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.719 <v Speaker 1>quite the trade off that people often think it is. 0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.239 <v Speaker 1>All right, well, speaking of that, this has been best 0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.799 <v Speaker 1>in both worlds. We've been doing our mailbag episode and 0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:00.839 <v Speaker 1>we will be back next week with more on making 0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:05.319 <v Speaker 1>work and life fit together. Thanks for listening. You can 0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.839 <v Speaker 1>find me Sarah at the shoebox dot com or at 0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.400 <v Speaker 1>the Underscore Shoebox on Instagram, and you can find me 0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.680 <v Speaker 1>Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. This has been the 0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.200 <v Speaker 1>best of Both Worlds podcasts. Please join us next time 0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.040 <v Speaker 1>for more on making work and life work together.