Instant Reaction: Supreme Court Backs Full Access to Abortion Pill
The Supreme Court preserved full access to a widely used abortion pill in a case that carried major stakes for reproductive rights and election-year politics. Bloomberg's Paul Sweeney and Alix Steel bring you instant reaction from our Bloomberg News team.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
2024-06-13
14 min
Transcript
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
No generated results are available for this episode yet.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.
Transcript
Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. We have some breaking 0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:08.399 news for you here. 0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.720 The Supreme Court is upholding full access to mif a 0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:17.079 pristone abortion pill. So this ruling came as the FDA 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.640 had imposed restrictions on the pill that the agency found 0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.360 were unnecessary, and a court considered a Biden administration appeal 0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.520 of that ruling. And the requirements were things like making 0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.519 in person visits to their doctor in order to obtain 0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.520 this pill. And it looks like the FDA won this case, 0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.800 Supreme Court upholding full access to mif a pristone abortion pill. 0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.600 The issue really was about did the FDA overdo it? 0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.919 Did they expand when they shouldn't have. We are going 0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.920 to be talking about that much more. June Grasso is 0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:56.639 in studio joining us. No, you're ready, You're good, You're good, great, okay, great, Hi, 0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.000 thanks for joining you ran here. We appreciate you. 0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.440 Yes, thank you. Okay, So walk us through the importance. 0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.840 Well, obviously, the importance is that MEPhI pristone is the 0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.280 abortion drug that is most used excuse me, in this country, 0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.240 So putting restrictions on it would mean problems for a lot. 0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.320 Of women in this country. 0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.200 In this case, what the Supreme Court did, and this 0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.800 is not a surprise decision actually, because after the oral 0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.000 arguments in the case, it was pretty much telegraphed by 0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.759 the justices that they were going to go off. They're 0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.520 not talking about MIFHA pristone, they're not talking about abortion. 0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.120 What they're talking about is standing, which is a procedural thing, really, 0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.720 and it's a way sometimes for them to get out 0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.920 of cases, out of deciding the merits of the case 0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.720 by looking at the procedural elements. 0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.480 So here they said that the doctors who. 0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.640 Challenged it and the groups who challenged it didn't have 0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.560 standing because they weren't hurt in any way. One way 0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.040 they put it is like, you know, have a dog 0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.600 in the fight. So the doctors, they were trying to 0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.880 show that they had some injury. What was their injury 0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.560 that it was very speculative, you know, if someone came 0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.400 into an emergency room and needed an abortion, and it 0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.040 just was ridiculous. So at that point the justices all 0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.560 seemed to agree that they didn't have standing. So it's 0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.800 an off ramp. They haven't decided anything really about abortion. 0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.520 Okay, but this, for all intents, this settles The issue 0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.920 as it relates to this particular drug, is that the 0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.000 case is that where we are right now. I guess. 0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.760 I'm not sure because I think we'll see challenges to 0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.359 all kinds of abortion, you know, abortion pills and everything else, 0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.480 you know, because the lobby is so strong against it. 0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.639 So I'm not sure this ends it. This ends this 0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.320 particular challenge, but I don't know that it ends any 0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.120 challenge to mif for pristone. You know, they still have 0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.200 the base. They still have the base challenge, which is 0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:58.079 that the FDA didn't have the authority to put the 0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.280 for pristone on the market the way that it had 0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.040 through the you know, to get it through the mail 0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.600 and things. So I mean, I'm not sure they may 0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.239 be able to find a different group that has standing 0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.400 and you know, reassert the challenge, but you know, I'm trying. 0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.400 I don't know what group they would find. 0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.120 So if I just sort of break this down in 0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.760 Layman's terms, So the Biden administration made this drug more 0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:24.600 widely available, then the doctor said. 0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.120 We don't want this, we want more restrictions. Is that 0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.240 what this is one doctor through like one doctor's group. 0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:37.800 A doctor's group that is anti abortion, a conservative Christian 0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.680 doctor's group said challenged it, and I mean the way 0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.720 these things work is, you know, there are conservative organizations 0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.040 and conservative legal groups that go out and look for 0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.120 plaintiffs to find when they want to sue on something. 0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.400 So this group in particular sued in this case. Some 0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.680 states tried to intervene and the Supreme Court didn't allow that. 0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.120 So you know, states may be able to come forward 0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.320 and say this, this hurts are What they say is 0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.840 that this hurts our bottom line because we don't get 0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.600 to have, you know, different healthcare choices. 0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.000 I mean, there are all different ways. 0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.760 Because in the lower court ordered the FDA to impose 0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.839 restrictions on the pill that the agency was like, look, 0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.120 this is not necessary and these are things like you 0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.000 have to make an in person visit to your doctor 0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:23.680 before you. 0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:24.279 Get the pill. 0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.760 That is what is no longer there, right Like, that 0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.960 is what the Supreme Court ruled and said, nope, you 0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:30.479 can have this free access. 0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:31.480 Right now, I haven't read the case. 0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.880 I don't know if they sent this back to the 0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.200 Fifth Circuit or not, so I don't have the case 0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.320 in front of me. I'm sort of working in the 0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:37.960 dark here. 0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.279 I don't know if there's darkness better than us. 0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.800 Yeah, good. But I don't know if they send it 0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.159 back to the Fifth Circuit for more findings, because this 0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.480 came up from a Texas judge and the Texas judge 0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.599 had even more restrictions on it, and it went to 0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.360 the Fifth Circuit, they dial back some of the restrictions, 0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.920 and then it went to the Supreme Court. So when 0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.479 I get my hands on the opinion, I may be 0:04:58.560 --> 0:04:59.640 able to tell you more. 0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.600 Now, does this affect individuals? How does this affect individual states? 0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.919 And women in those states that no longer have access 0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:09.880 to MEPhI princetone. 0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:16.680 So you know it should individual states can do different things. Okay, 0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.120 so individual states are looking for a lot of different 0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.600 ways to penalize women who leave the state for abortions. So, 0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.440 but with MYFI pristone, because it comes through the mail, 0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.000 it's much easier. 0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:30.480 For women to get. 0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:35.560 And in fact, some organizations have been stockpiling MIFA pristone 0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.000 just in case anything happened with the Supreme Court. So 0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:41.839 what they'll be able to do, I mean, I think 0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.040 what this says is for right now, there's full access 0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.440 to MIFA pristone. I mean, the states have been ingenious 0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.120 in coming up with ways to try to stop abortion. 0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.960 I mean you've seen the different ways that they've tried, 0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.560 not only you know, to the point where women can't 0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.200 even get emergency medical care if they need an abortion. 0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.280 And that case is coming up, by the way, that 0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.440 Idaho case is coming up. Whether or not if a 0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.800 woman is not in fear of her life is not 0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.200 on the line, but perhaps some other things are on 0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.239 the line, perhaps her organs are in jeopardy or something 0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.080 like that, whether they have to give her an abortion 0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.720 if that's what is necessary, And that's coming up. That's 0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.840 an Idaho case that was heard late in the term. 0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.279 So there are ingenious ways to try to stop abortion. 0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.760 And I don't know for sure, but in. 0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.880 Reality, can can women in all fifty states get this 0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:35.919 via the mail? 0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:36.839 Yeah? 0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.080 Yeah, So I mean there's no and I'm not sure 0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.240 how is there practical ways you stop that. 0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.000 Well, there's an act that hasn't been there's an act 0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.080 that hasn't been the Comstock Act that hasn't been used 0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.440 for I don't know how long, and that some conservatives 0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.080 say that maybe the next avenue that you shouldn't send 0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.120 certain things through the mail, so that could be another 0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.039 way to attack it. As I said, I mean, I 0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.719 don't want this to be the end of the attacks, right, 0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.839 just think that it's just been shown that there's so 0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.400 many ingenious ways to I mean, this is the law 0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.560 you know you have we do you have one argument 0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.240 and it turns out there are ten arguments. So but 0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.280 this one. You know why it was easy for the 0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.520 Supreme Court I'll say easy in quotes, because they found 0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.320 an easy way to get out of it. They just said, 0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.840 and they do this a lot, right, people will say standing, 0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:29.600 what's standing? 0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:30.360 Standing? 0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.080 I had a professor that once said, you know, the 0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.400 ingeniousness of lawyers is that you can always find a 0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.000 way to turn it into a procedural argument. And that's 0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.600 what they do. And in this case, it was pretty 0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.600 easy because you didn't see any injury to doctors. What 0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:45.360 injury do they have? 0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.760 So you mentioned the Idaho case that's Moyle versus the 0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.160 US right and that issue. It seems like, does the 0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.560 federal law permit er doctors to perform abortions to preserve 0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.640 a woman's health even if stays outlawed that procedure? So 0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.880 this is to your point of like, can they save 0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.080 the woman or can they help the woman even if 0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.280 the state outlaws abortion altogether. 0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:14.600 So Idaho has a law that allows abortions if the 0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.520 woman's life is in jeopardy. The Biden administration came in 0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:23.480 and said no, because you're taking money from the federal government, right, 0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.320 we have the right to tell you that you have 0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.120 to also treat women who come to an emergency room. 0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:32.960 And it's not that their life is in jeopardy, but 0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.280 something else is in jeopardy. 0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.880 Their organs are in jeopardy. I mean different kinds of things. 0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.360 Right, I'm not a doctor, so I thank god I'm 0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:41.959 not a doctor, so I don't know what, but different 0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.120 kinds of things. And you have to treat that woman 0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.560 and give her an abortion, even if her life isn't 0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:51.400 in jeopardy. So that's the issue, and that case. 0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.360 I mean, there was a little more. 0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.200 I couldn't tell you how that case is going to 0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.400 come out because it wasn't as clear some of these cases. 0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.040 You know, we say, oh, we don't know what they're 0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.240 going to decide, but it's pretty clear what the going 0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.520 to decide. I don't know about the Idaho case how 0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:03.319 that's going to come down. 0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.520 So this particular ruling here is is it feels, just 0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.880 reading on some of the initial reporting, that it's kind 0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.320 of a technical lawyer type thing. 0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.200 Yeap procede, That's what I said. 0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.040 So, I mean it sounds like, as you mentioned earlier, 0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.720 that they can various scripts, can come back and approach 0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.520 this issue from other angles. 0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.839 Perhaps, as I said, it's ingenious the number of ways. 0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.160 I mean, it's sort of like if you remember affirmative action, 0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.640 and for many, many years affirmative action, it kept on 0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.160 getting you know, the protests to it or the challenges 0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.160 to it kept on getting rejected. And then there was 0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.000 this man who has who has students for fair admissions, 0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.680 and he kept fighting and fighting and fighting and waited 0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.280 until the Supreme Court turned more conservative, and then all 0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.800 of a sudden, the Supreme Courts you know, reversed itself 0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.600 and said, no, you know, we can't have affirmative actions. 0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:52.600 So I mean, that's what I mean. 0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.240 They have very well funded groups that are fighting abortion 0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:01.480 on every level, so I don't, you know, rule out 0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.760 the fact that there'll be other challenges to it. 0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:04.280 All. 0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.720 Right, Hey, June, thank you so much. She literally booked 0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.080 in here. We really appreciate that. 0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.160 Thank you. 0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.000 No, sorry, thank you, Yeah. 0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.880 Thank you so much. Jin Gretso Bloomberg joining us there. 0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.920 We all want to go to Madelein Meckelberg. She's a 0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.840 Bloomberg legal reporter. She also joins us on this news 0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.160 And remember, let's just recap here for a moment. The 0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.520 Supreme Court has ruled that there will be full access 0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.760 to mif A pristone abortion pill. Madeline, can you walk 0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.959 us through how this case unfolded? 0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.960 Hi, thanks for having me on to talk about this case. So, 0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.439 the Supreme Court this morning they overturned a decision from 0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.800 a federal appeals court that would have prevented mail order 0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.000 prescriptions for MIFA pristone. And this is the case that 0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:52.120 started in Texas. 0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:52.600 It was a. 0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.360 Conservative group they challenged access to the abortion pill, and 0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.360 we're seeking to have the original FDA approved of the 0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.559 pill rolled back. As the case moved through the courts, 0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.400 the Federal Appeals Court in New Orleans, that's the Fifth Circuit, 0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.720 they basically said they can't go back enough in time 0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.160 and undo the original FDA approval, but what they can 0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.000 do is turn back some of the more recent decisions 0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.640 which would have allowed the pill to be sent through 0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.440 the mail and used in a wider number of abortions. 0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.240 What the Supreme Court did today was say full access 0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:27.319 has to be preserved. 0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.120 So is this the final word for myth of pristone 0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.160 and its availability in this country or is it still 0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.080 perhaps at risk of some regulation. 0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.559 So I think we're still going to see some action 0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.559 on this. This case was on kind of a preliminary 0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.440 basis at this point, I think we could see it 0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.679 come back up again. And what the Supreme Court did 0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.679 today was not rule on the merits of the FDA's 0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.120 decision to approve myth of pristone. They blocked this lawsuit 0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.040 on standing. So they basically said that the individuals that 0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.040 brought the challenge they didn't actually have the right to 0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.160 sue because they couldn't demonstrate that the FDA's actions harmed 0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.439 them directly because federal law protects doctors from providing abortions 0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.199 if they have moral objections. So they said these people 0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.679 can't sue. But that does mean that there may be 0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.959 is a pathway for others to bring a lawsuit if 0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.360 they wanted to challenge the same thing. 0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.080 When does the Supreme Court term end? And what are 0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.559 some other big ones that our audience for Boomberg Intelligence 0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:28.600 Radio will be interested in. 0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.320 That's a great question. I know that we're waiting for 0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.440 at least one other abortion decision as it relates to 0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.640 emergency room access in Idaho. There are a couple of 0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.640 big Trump cases on the docket, so we've got a 0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.000 couple of weeks left where we're going to expect to 0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.200 see some decisions, and we'll be keeping an eye. 0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.280 Out, Madlin. How unexpected was this ruling given the makeup 0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:51.760 of the court today. 0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.560 I think it's definitely if you're looking just at the makeup, 0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.040 this is a surprising decision given what we know about 0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.199 this court that is the same one that overturned Roe v. 0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:01.800 Wade. 0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.480 But when there was a hearing on this case in March, 0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.199 we definitely got a sense from justices that they were 0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.240 skeptical about the standing issue that was raised in this lawsuit. 0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.240 So while broadly speaking, this is kind of surprising for 0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.400 this court based on this case specifically and what we 0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.200 heard from justices previously, it's in line. 0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.920 We were talking to June about the other abortion case 0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.240 that's coming to the fore as well, Moile versus the US, 0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.280 and that really centers around Idaho's abortion van considering whether 0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.680 a federal law that requires hospitals to provide stabilizing emergency 0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.760 care Trump's any abortion restrictions. Does this give us any 0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.040 roadmap for that case. 0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.040 It's hard to say. There are really different questions. I 0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.040 think that what we know is that the Court is 0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.440 considering any abortion question that comes before it pretty carefully. 0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.320 In light of this road decision that sought to return 0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.040 things to the state. These are two examples where we're 0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.760 seeing them having to deal with the consequences of that 0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.679 decision and them weighing in on these regulations. They're kind 0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.319 of different issues, but I think that we can expect 0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.200 to see maybe some nuanced perspectives from the court on this. 0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.760 All right, madam, thank you so much. We appreciate that. 0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.720 Madelin Meckelburgh, legal reporter for Bloomberg News. She's based in Austin, Texas, 0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.000 and it's just you know, when you get a piece 0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.640 of news like this coming across it maybe is not 0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.280 in our typical remit. We have some experts literally around 0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.720 the corner in June Grass, so literally a phone call 0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.640 away in Madeleine Meckelburg to help us understand what which. 0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:27.440 We very much appreciate. 0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.840 Which we very much appreciate, makes it sound a lot smarter.
Chapters
No chapters available.