The Financial Sector - Bonds, Stocks and Shares - should you or shouldn't you?
Are you thinking about investing in the Financial Markets? Should you put some of your retirement savings into bonds, or stocks and shares? Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers explain how you can invest and have some simple words of advice for you.
Co-host: Nastaran Tavakoli-Far. Editor: Alastair Elphick. A Modulated Media Production.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
2021-03-02
25 min
Transcript
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
No generated results are available for this episode yet.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.
Transcript
Malaya, Betsy Justin. I'm really excited by today's topic and I'm hoping I can get some free world class advice from you both. Okay, here wrestling nows. So I have the Financial Times in front of me. I'm opening the market data pages, so I am seeing numbers to do with the SMP five hundred where this is going on. Then a bit further down, let's see we have we have bond indices, index linked ten year government spreads, high yield, and emerging markets. I've got tons of tables in front of me, some graphs, just a lot going on on this page. I like the fact that you're getting organized and you're going to get active with your money. Now. These are big issues and it's time to get some research done. Well. I have to say, this is all pretty confusing, and I've not actually put my money into anything yet, but I'm hoping you could. You could help me navigate some of these graphs and chants and things. Na I hope you don't have your money under a mattress right now. No, she's just the ft. He does not have a mattress index and big surprised and as I get questions like this, a lot all economists do, but I'm here to give you some unexpected advice. Putting money into stocks and bonds can be a pretty good way of supercharging your savings, but there are plenty of pitfalls along the way, which is why it's important to know a bit more before you move your money from your savings account to other more complicated financial markets like the stock market. The financial sector and financial markets are what we'll be looking at on today's episode of Think Like an Economist with Me Betsy Stevenson and. I'm Justin Wolfers. This is the podcast where we teach you the super tools of econom makes it'll transform your life. NaSTA Antevichally Farr and her Financial Times are with us. Nas tell me about your plans. I've been doing quite a bit of research over the past few months. Basically, I've got a bit of money sitting in the bank in a savings account and it's, you know, earning a little bit of interest. But I feel like I want to get more back and I should be able to put my money somewhere better where it's going to earn me something. So you've discovered the simplest investment vehicle, which is just to leave your money in the bank. The problem with that, of course, is the real return you get how much more stuff you can buy with that money in the future. It's really low. It's low risk, but it's low return. Yeah, a bank savings account just doesn't have very much risk. In fact, in some countries it has no risk because of deposit insurance. And it's pretty liquid, which means that you can walk into your bank today and withdraw all of your money and your bank should be able to give it to you. But those two things together, I mean, you're not going to earn very much to interest when you put your money into a savings account. Betsy's just highlighted the two big ideas I want you to be thinking about. The first is risk, what's the chance you lose a lot of money? And liquidity? Will you be able to easily and quickly convert your investments into cash without losing much along the way. I'm reading a lot about stocks and bonds. Well, they're the main things that are coming up and the pros and cons of each. So bonds are like loans and stocks are like a percentage of the company. Yeah, let's start with bonds. Bonds are when we lend money to companies, or when you lend money to governments and you get paid back with interest. Companies and governments need to raise money and one of the ways they do this is through issuing bonds. Same Microsoft needs two hundred million for money to spend on research for upcoming products. They could go to a bank to borrow two hundred million dollars, or they could start issuing bonds. You would buy the bond, which is basically giving the amount you pay for that bond as a loan to Microsoft. The bond states the conditions of the loan, meaning it states when you'll get paid back and how much interest you'll get paid. So if you're a holder of a bond issued by Microsoft, then you're a lender to Microsoft. Now this sounds kind of weird to me because I don't have that much money and Microsoft is a huge company, so why are they coming to me for a loan. That's the magic of the bond market nets you're going to lend them just a small fraction of what it is that they need to borrow. Microsoft could try asking one lender, say a bank, to borrow that full two hundred million. But say something happens to Microsoft and they can't pay it back. Lending two hundred million to one person or company is basically a big risk for the lender. Yeah, but what if Microsoft has to borrow a thousand dollars instead. Well, if something happens and they can't pay you back, losing a thousand bucks is a much smaller risk. And so when companies or governments issue bonds, they get lots of lenders to each lend them smaller chunks of money. This a layers the lenders to spread their risk and be more willing to lend in the first place. So, as I'm going through all these tables and charts and things, I'm saying that governments also issue bonds. And we hear about US treasury bills, which are also called t bills or treasuries. There's guilts in the UK and buns in Germany. It's the exact same idea. Just as companies need to borrow money, so do governments, and governments do it through the bond market. So whenever you hear about government debt, remember the government's not borrowing from a bank, it's raising that money by issuing bonds. Now, there's not much risk in lending to the US government, but they need lots of people to be able to borrow trillions of dollars since no one person could front them, you know, a multi trillion dollar loone. In a lot of ways, I like the sound of getting into bonds because I like this concept of lending my money to a government so they can spend on a big public infrastructure project or something really important for society. But how worried do I need to be that I'm not going to get my money back. I wouldn't be that worried lending money to a government. But the reality is that whenever you lend money, there's always a risk that you won't get it paid back. One of the main risks with bonds is what we call default risk. So when you think about buying a bond, particularly a corporate bond, you want to try to figure out how risky it's gonna be. And the way you can assess that is by using what are called credit ratings. Those ratings are going to tell you how risky that bond is in terms of its ability to get paid back. Yes, so there's ratings companies like Fitch, Standard and Pores Moodies. They put ratings next to bonds, so I'm looking on my tables. There's stuff like triple A B C minus, which sound like sound like grades for a university paper. Yeah, well it's not that different. I mean, these are gonna help you decide if you want to lend or not. Then it's worth remembering that the worst of bonds ratings, that means that we think they might not pay back. So the higher the interest rate the bond needs to offer because they might default. Okay, so these credit ratings are helpful. But the other thing I'm worried about is what if something happens, like I have a big family emergency or something, and I need my money now. With my money being in a savings account, I can just go to the bank and take my money out, But what if it's tied up in a bond. And also the bonds i'm seeing they tend to promise to pay me back in like seven, ten, twenty years time, so quite a long way down the line. Yeah. So, I mean, you're right that a bond doesn't have the same liquidity that your savings account has. But remember last week when I said the stock market is a second hand market, Well, there's also a second hand market for bonds. That means you can resell your bond to someone else and hopefully you'll get a pretty good price. And what do you mean by hopefully? Yeah, that doesn't sound that great, right, You're like, Eh, I would like it to be more like, for sure, I'll get it for the price. Well, look, it could be hard to find a buyer, particularly if you're holding a more niche bond from a small company, or if the company's credit rating has been downgraded since you purchase the bond. We call this liquidity risk. Bonds issued by major governments are just not that risky. Usually they tend to be plenty of people who want to buy German bonds or UK guilts or US Treasury bills every single day. But it can be harder to find a buyer to a bond issued by a small company. And so that's the logic for why bonds issued by these big governments tend to be the most stable places to keep your money. US government bonds are the safest investment. Is the US government always pays its debt. We hope, so look, they can always print more money. I mean, it would be very unusual for the US to default on its dead but I do feel like every time I say that I should knock wood or something. Yeah, but people seem to believe that. And so there's a lot of demand for US treasuries and so around five hundred billion million dollars of them are traded every single day. Wow, that is huge. Okay, So one last thing about bonds. We've talked about risk, But what happens if a company goes bankrupt If. A company to close bankruptcy, then all its assets get sold and they're used to pay off its debts. Now, remember, if you own a bond, you're one of those debts. So bondholders get paid before shareholders will come to shares and shareholders in just a moment. And what about if a company owes more money than it can raise by selling off its assets. Well, then the bondholders will get at least a partial payout and stockholders will get nothing. That's the risk you hold if you own part of the company. Overall, I'd sum up bonds by saying they seem fairly low risk and relatively stable. You're basically getting your loan back plus interest, and this is pretty low rewards compared to what you could get back on the stock market, which is the other place I've been eyeing. Okay, I am now looking at stock market biggest movers and maybe shakers. This section in the FT so in Japan, I see car companies Toyota, Mitsubishi. US, we've got Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook, Pfiza. In the UK, we've got Astrazeneka. It seems like there's a lot of these COVID vaccine makers in these mover and shaker lists. Now, it's actually what I really like about the companies you just listed, And not all of them, but a lot of them are companies that actually did pretty well because of the pandemic. And so one of the reasons why you're seeing these big movers is because like everybody's staying home and streaming Disney. We've got Amazon, which just was you know, obviously pandemic winner. Here, I mean, not all of them. You know, we're going to talk about what determines how stock prices change. You know, there's just like a lot of uncertainty about what's that sort of fundamental value of the company. So let's dig into stocks and think about where it comes from. I like the thought of lending to one of these vaccine makers right now, Sayffizer or astrazenica. You absolutely want to invest in a vaccine make a twelve months before a pandemic. You gotta be really careful about trying to think that you have something to add here. So let's back it up and think about what a stock price is all about, what. A stock's all about ness. What you're discovering is companies have a whole lot of different ways of raising money. They could go to the bank, they could issue a bond, But the other thing they can do is issue stock to the public. That's two people like you and matinace. When they issue stock, when it's brand new stock, that's raising money for the company. And if you hold that stock and then go and sell it on the stock market, that's just reselling second hand stock. Yep, that's why I said the stock market it's just a big second hand market because most of the stocks you see traded are stocks people already owned. It's not raising money for the company, it's just stocks changing hands. So let's say you bought shares Infiser NAZ. You'd be getting a tiny fraction of the company. If you bought the right number of shares, maybe you'd own one billionth of Pfizer. If you buy shares Infiser, you become a partial owner of Pfizer. Well, if Pfizer makes money, so to you. At the end of the year, Pfizer will tally out its profits. It may decide to pay some portion to you. These are called dividends. And it'll take the rest and reinvest it in creating new vaccines. So some companies pay out dividends really frequently, say every three months or so. Others pay them much more infrequently and instead use their profits to grow the company. But that doesn't cost you money because hopefully that reinvestment will still generate a return for you, because if the company becomes more valuable, your shares become more valuable, and so you'll still get richer. But only when you sell that stock. By owning shares of the company do I get other rights. I'm thinking this because ownership tends to generally give people certain rights. You bet, if you buy stock in Pfiser, you own't part of Pfiser, So you'll get to vote in shareholder meetings, and often you get to have a say in major decisions like whether fireser mergers with another company, or really big strategic questions like that. Not the day to day stuff. Now, going back to my list of biggest movers in the Financial Times, there are columns telling me about the closing price and also the days change in the price. There are also some charts and graphs which you know, show movements and price throughout the day. What's all of this about. That's the other way you can make a profit from owning stock. Some people used to invest because what they are after was dividends. But the other thing that can happen is the value of your shares rise over time. So right now, the outlooks pretty good for vaccine makers like Astrazenic, Real Phizer, and that's why they're on the biggest Movi's list. Now, I quite liked the iSER of bonds. I'm thinking, what are the pros and cons of shares compared to bonds. Well, with shares, your profit if the company profits. Right, So that's when we were talking about if you could go back in time before the pandemic and have bought those shares the vaccine makers or Amazon, well, those companies just became a lot more valuable now, and that would mean that your shares became a lot more valuable, So you profit when the company profits. If on the other hand you'd been thinking, you know, what I really want to do is buy some shares and a hospitality company prior to the pandemic, Well, you would have been a loser along with the company, because that's basically it. You're like a part. Owner, higher risk, higher return. And then I'm going to come back to my big concern again. What if I have an emergency and I need to get access to my money quickly. Well, you're going to have to go back to that secondhand market, the stock market to find someone to buy your shares. But don't worry, shares tend to have pretty high liquidity, and I think you'll be able to find someone to quickly buy your pfisor shares if you urgently need the cash. The value of those shares, however, is going to depend on what people currently think the value of Pfizer is. So if it's gone up or down since you bought your stock's going to affect whether you sell it for more or less than what you bought it for. Now, Betsy justin, I want to know what to do with my small stack of money. So we've just done stocks. I'm interested in these graphs that are showing changes in stock prices, and I'm guessing these may be determined by supply and demand. Now as at this point you're getting it, everything is determined by supply and demand, including stock prices, And so you can think of yourself as both a potential buyer of stocks. You might buy some astrasenica or a seller. You might think about selling your fires as stock. But how do I know if the price is right and if I should be selling my astrosenica stocks. The truth is you'll never know. But one way of thinking about it is buying or selling a share all depends on the comparison between its price and its fundamental value. The fundamental value of a stock is the present value of the future profits that the company's going to earn. Yeah, so this goes to theory that if a company is doing well or their future looks promising, then their share price will rise. Yeah. It sounds complicated, but really you're simply asking yourself how much you think the company's really worth. That worth is about its future stream of profits. So there's really two lenses for thinking about what determines stock prices. In the first instance, it's determined by supply and demand. But buyers and sellers. Why are they buying stocks. It's because they value the stream of future profits. And so what really matters, what's driving their behavior is the net present value of the company's future earnings. So it's all about its future prospects. You're talking a lot about beliefs about a company and how well they're doing now and how well we think they're going to do in the future. I am. And that's because if there are thousands of people buying and selling stocks and doing their homework, then stock prices will come to reflect all of the different pieces of information that was driving the decision of those buyers and sellers. So this is the idea we call the efficient market hypothesis, that company's stock price will come to reflect all publicly available information. So this is a really important idea. So let's say that there's some good news about Visor. You know, some of the chemicals used to make the vaccine or cheaper, or turns out the vaccine is more effective than people originally thought. Well, that means that Visor's future profitability is likely to be higher. And if it's higher, it means it's fundamental value is higher, means it's future stream of profits is higher. That means people want to buy stock Advisor it's worth more. And so an analyst who discovers that good news, they want to run out and buys stock in that company with the good news as soon as possible. Yeah, and I see that this will then push the price up. Now here's the depressing part. This is why it's hard to actually make money trying to cherry pick the perfect stock. It's a lot of work to try to figure out a company's future value, and there are a lot of specialists trying to do it. The reality now is actually tough to beat the market division. Market hypothesis doesn't mean that a stock's price is always equal to its fundamental value. I think this is a place where people get confused. But it means that it's impossible to predict if a stock is priced accurately based on publicly available information. And here's the thing. Men love to actively trade stocks. Oh figure, but they lose money on average. All the time. What do you mean by they lose money. Well, they should have just invested passively, which is when you buy an indexed fund it's called indexed. It's going to give you a tiny little bit of each item in the stock market. Or the index that you're looking at, say that S and P five hundred. So you mean that you can only really make money and assess of a stock is over underpriced if you've got access to some kind of inside information or something. Now that's called insider trading, and it's illegal. The point we're trying to get to is that there are these thousands of highly paid analysts working in all sorts of investment houses, and they're all doing homework to try to predict the future of each of these companies, and the moment they get a sceric of news, they'll start trading on that information. As a result, it becomes impossible to predict if the price of a stock's going to rise or fall, because if it's going to a rise next week, someone will go ahead and start buying it today. Rights I've already risen, and. That's the problem. So some wise guys trying to beat you to predicting where the market's going, and as a result, you can't see where it's going. So I've been looking at all these charts and graphs and trying to find a pattern. Do you mean to say that that's not really gonna help me? It's not gonna help you at all. You can't predict the unpredictable. But the truth is most humans think they can. Because we're fallible. We like to think that we can spot patterns, that we can find order among the chaos, or we can pay the best stock picker to tell us how. It gives us psychological comfort, But it's dead wrong. So if I can't spot any patterns with what's going to happen with Pfizer or Apple's share prices, why would I pay someone a lot of money to make these trades for me? Oh gosh, all the world managers and stockbrokers are gonna hate us now. But yeah, there's no point in paying them to move your money around to supposedly get the best returns. You might as well hire Orlando the cat. I love this story. A few years ago, as a British newspaper, The Observer, they ran a stock picking contest and they recruited a bunch of financial experts, some high school students, and a cat called Orlando. And so everyone was given five thousand pounds at the start of the contest to spend on stocks, and the goal was to see who could create the most valuable portfolio by the end of the contest. There are a lot of these examples out there in the world, where you know, you sort of show that people really skilled can't beat the person doing it randomly. But this's my very favorite example because the random person was not a person. It was Orlando the cat, who was picking his stocks by throwing his toy mouse onto a grid with numbers which represented different companies. So Orlando and his toy mouse picked stocks, and at the. End of the year, Orlando's portfolio made five hundred and forty two pounds in profits and the professional investors made only one hundred and seventy six pounds. So I've got a cat for you, nas. The point here isn't invest through a cat. The point is even these super fancy guys in super fancy suits are no smarter than your cat. Look, you just can't waste your time hiring a stockbroker to trade for you. The secret is to just put your money into well diversified index funds. It's what most economists do with their savings. Is you buy an index with all the funds and say the S and P five hundred index, or say the Footsy one hundred index. You get a well diversified portfolio and you just leave your money there to grow. I really like the sound of this. Actually that's the power of the efficient market type of this. We learned that we can't predict future stock performance. We learn to be humble so we keep things simple. Another tip is to pick a fund with the smallest fees so that you can keep more of your profits. That's really really important because there are a lot of people out there. They're going to charge you a lot of money to do a lot of trading. They're not going to make you any money from that trading, and they're going to safen off a lot of your savings. You know, this is actually quite a big relief to hear, because whilst I've been enjoying going through going through the ft every day and looking at all these jobs and you know, trying to work out patterns and things, it also kind of seems pretty stressful. Either I've got to spend time trying to find patterns and the chals, or I've got to pay someone to make all these trades for me, and I don't really fancy either of those. My advice, nas is think like an economist and don't bother with all of that this will be the hardest advice for many of our listeners to take, because there are thousands of people being paid millions of dollars in order to convince you that they're smarter than the market. But the hard reality is when we look at their performance, they do no better than all Lando the cat. Betsy justin. That was really helpful. I'm actually going to put some of my money into index funds, but I do still want to buy some government bonds too. You know, bonds aren't quite as sexy as stocks, but they can be pretty effective if you buy bonds which mature and take twenty or thirty years time. Remember interest compounds, so you earn interest on interest and so on, and the next thing you know, you've doubled your money. Basically, you're reinvesting what you earn. So you need to start early and keep reinvesting your gains, and then you'll be left with a really secure fund for your retirement years. Albert Einstein is once reported to have said that the most powerful force on earth is the power of compound interest. Thanks for listening. There's a lot more from this show and others like it on the Himalaya Learning platform. Himalaya Learning provides bye sized courses from world class thinkers and industry experts for you to enjoy in the on the go. For exclusive content, including bonus episodes and supplemental materials, go to Himalaya dot com slash econ and enter promo code econ at checkout for your first fourteen days free. Himalaya dot com slash econ has loads of great shows like ours, so try it out using the promo code econ at checkout to get your first fourteen days free. It's time to think like an economist.
Chapters
No chapters available.