Moot, Wrong, and Irrelevant

Divided Argument

The shadow docket strikes once again! We break down the Court's unusual immigration ruling in AARP v. Trump (no, not that AARP!), and then briefly discuss the much-heralded ERISA case (Cunningham v. Cornell). But first we discuss some blog news, some SCOTUS news, and some SCOTUSblog news. 

2025-04-25 69 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

Will: Maybe it depends on the harmless error standard is actually an interesting question. So, as Judge Wilkinson said, the last time the Fourth Circuit got [unintelligible Abrego Garcia, the government says that he's going to be ineligible anyway. It doesn't matter. Maybe, but maybe not. The evidence we have of his membership in MS-13 is somewhat thin and more importantly six years old. I think the question is whether he is currently a member of a foreign terrorist organization. I just don't think we know. And so, I guess if you thought that he had to prove the error was harmful beyond some standard, like we do in some contexts, maybe that's an interesting question.

Chapters

No chapters available.