Instant Reaction: Nvidia Sales Forecast Falls Short
Nvidia, the chipmaker at the heart of the artificial intelligence boom, gave a revenue forecast that fell short of some of the most optimistic estimates, stoking concerns that its explosive growth is waning. Bloomberg Businessweek hosts Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec talk with Bloomberg Technology co-host Ed Ludlow and Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Semiconductor Analyst Kunjan Sobhani for instant reaction and analysis for Nvidia's earnings results.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
2024-08-28
21 min
Transcript
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
No generated results are available for this episode yet.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.
Transcript
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.399 Let's talk in video and video shares did shed more 0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.920 than two percent ahead of its earnings report that are 0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.480 due in the coming minutes. The stock up more than 0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.279 one hundred and fifty percent so far this year. It 0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.560 is the top performer in the S and P five 0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.680 hundred and the NASDAQ one hundred. Let's go down to 0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.600 Bloomberg Technology co host ed Ludlow, who joins us from 0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.000 our San Francisco bureau, ed the most important numbers you're 0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.239 watching in just a few minutes. When these earnings cross, 0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:33.800 what are they? 0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:35.080 I mean, all of them. 0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920 It's probably the most important earnings report in my career, 0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.479 which is not quite as long as both of yours. 0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.319 But you go straight to the data center business, and 0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.960 not necessarily for the quarter gone. We have a good 0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.080 sense of how that will go. Will probably be twenty 0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.920 five billion dollars of data center revenue. You have to 0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.720 go straight to the outlook or the guide for the 0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.160 fiscal third quarter because that answers the only question we have, 0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.240 which is what is the staying power of this AI 0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.240 investment cycle? 0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.759 And you know the thing is, I think about the expectations, 0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.559 how high they are ed, and we've seen the stock, 0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.679 which we saw it sell off kind of like early 0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.800 or mid June, right, and then yes, we saw an 0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.200 equal bounce like about twenty seven percent from that low 0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.440 over the summer. So expectations going into this are super high, 0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.600 which makes me think, does it have to be a 0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.920 tremendous beat as we've come to expect from this company, 0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.360 otherwise there's going to be a little bit of disappointment 0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:32.240 or some questions. 0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.240 Well, let's take the third quarter fiscal third quarter guide example. 0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.680 You know, the average analyst estimate is thirty one point 0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.399 nine billion dollars, but at the very top end of estimates, 0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.640 you're talking thirty eight thirty nine billion dollars. There are 0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.240 some on the street who have very high expectations. I've 0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760 learned from people like you at Bloomberg over the years. 0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.640 One market session a market does not make. This is 0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.880 a stock up one hundred and fifty percent year to date, 0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.440 but almost one thousand percent from its October twenty twenty 0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.160 two bear market low. It was incredibly overbought January through March, 0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.040 and then again in June and July, and retail investors 0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.919 continue to pile in that sets us up for some tension, I. 0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.600 Think, yeah, speaking attention, about thirty seconds away from when 0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.239 we are expecting those numbers. 0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.560 Doc is up one point six percent here ahead of 0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.600 the earnings. So we're just waiting for Nvidia to cross. 0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.440 So we're seeing some trade ahead of the results, actually crossing, 0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.720 some optimistic trading, if you will. As we said, the stock, 0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.160 which was a little bit lower today, it's bouncing here 0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.960 almost two percent here in the aftermarket. So I don't know, 0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.400 seven seconds and we expect these numbers. 0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.120 Yeah, I'm gonna let Ed Ludlow take a look at 0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.359 his Bloomberg terminal, as we do expect these numbers to take. 0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.920 These numbers to cross imminently right now. As a reminder 0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.840 in Kiga notes, let's do this typically hits at twenty 0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:46.400 pass all right. 0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.800 Second quarter revenue folks, thirty billion dollars estimate was twenty 0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.480 eight point eighty six billion, So again that is a beat. 0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.920 Company approving an additional fifty billion dollars in share buyback. Again, 0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.760 the stock up about two and a quarter percent here 0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:00.600 in the after market. 0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.960 Yeah, the company c's third quarter revenue at thirty two 0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.480 point five billion plus or minus two percent. The company 0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.320 maintains its quarterly dividend at one cent per share. Second 0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.320 quarter data center revenue that is a very important metric 0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.840 to keep an eye on. That as the vast majority 0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.960 of the company's revenue coming in at twenty six point 0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.400 three billion dollars, beating estimates of twenty five point oh 0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.280 eight billion dollars. So justin gross margin for the second 0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.880 quarter coming in right above, just above estimates, seventy five 0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.520 point seven percent, Carol estimates were for seventy five point 0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:30.120 five percent. 0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.120 All right, we're talking with Ed Ludlow, the co host 0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.760 of Bloomberg Technology, and you said the numbers, you're watching 0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.960 all of them, but you did single out initially the 0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.080 data center revenue, which we were expecting about twenty five billion. 0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:40.720 That's a bee. 0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:42.320 Yeah, it's a B. 0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:43.960 I mean, I've got the ticker for after I was 0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.760 trade in front of me, and my eyes are bouncing 0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.839 all around, and I think the market's taking a few 0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.080 seconds to make up its mind. 0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.080 Let's just run through it. 0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.560 Thirty two point five billion dollars plus all minus two 0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.520 percent is basically, I think in line with the thirty 0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.120 one point nine billion dollars that the street was looking for. 0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.200 I'll do the math on the point in due course. 0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.120 An impressive beat, I suppose on data center revenue in 0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.120 the second court had just gone in overall revenues. Then 0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.720 we asked the question, why why was it better? You know, 0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.080 they telegraphed that pretty well. And my goodness, don't you 0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.960 love it when there's consistency, when something that we were 0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.880 talking about continues to happen. And that is shareholder friendly policy. 0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.600 And I think that fifty billion dollars of edition will 0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.120 share buybacks, no one would be sort of disappointed with that. 0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.920 The stock up, you know, ish in after hours. 0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.480 Yeah, you know, we had a we were talking earlier 0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.640 about if things came in in line with expectations, because 0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.760 expectations were so high, you might not see a huge reaction, Carol, Right, 0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.680 even with a fifty billion dollars share buyback, we're barely 0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.359 seeing stock move in the after hours. 0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.800 Yeah, just up about one percent. Hey, dig it into 0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.760 the press release. You're going to talk with Jensen Wong, 0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.320 founder and CEO n Vidia later on. He says hyper 0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.800 demand remains strong and the anticipation for a blackwell is incredible. 0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.160 He said the company rechieve record revenues as global data 0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.120 centers are in full throttle to modernize the entire computing 0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.440 stack with accelerated computing and generative AI. Like, we know 0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.839 this guy knows how to speak and talk about his company, 0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.279 his market, his industry. But what are you looking for 0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.400 as you go through this press release and what are 0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.720 you thinking about that conversation you're going to have with it? 0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.039 Yeah, my eyes went straight to the Blackwell commentary and 0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:28.320 the anticipation being high. Excitement, anticipation are interesting words, but 0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.600 they are not a granular explanation of what's happening with Blackwell. 0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.039 The reporting was that due to the complexity of its design, 0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.880 it has two compute dies basically think about two triangles 0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.599 with a split between them, because it's so big. 0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:43.760 It's so much bigger. 0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.040 Than any other high performance GPU that's gone before it. 0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.640 And the reporting was that this presented a production challenge 0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.080 and so we want some specific detail on that. But 0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.240 again this is classic Jensen Wang that everything is intact, 0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.680 the AI investment cycle is there, and clearly he's bullish 0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.680 because in video is ninety nine percent of the market 0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.440 for this range of AI accelerators. 0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.600 Shares bouncing around a little bit, but they are now 0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.520 lower by about two point two percent in after hours 0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.440 trading AD I do wonder what the demand story is 0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:19.719 from customers, and now that we're seeing the latest results 0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.080 from in video, what's the story that you're seeing? I 0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.640 should say shares continue to move lower, down about three 0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:25.800 percent and after hours. 0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.479 So this is why we go straight to the guide 0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.400 or outlook for the current period or the fiscal third quarter. 0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.640 Because of the timing of Nvidia's earnings today August twenty eighth, 0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.960 it comes at the end of earning season where the 0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.240 capital expenditures guidance from the biggest Nvidia customers has been 0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.599 and gone. So if you look at the capital expenditures 0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.280 guidance of a Microsoft I think Carol pointed out very 0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.200 smartly that about forty five percent of Microsoft capex goes 0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.400 directly to Nvidia. We knew that they were committed to spending, 0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.400 but how confident is in video in that trend continuing 0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.960 over a longer time horizon. You look at the stop 0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.359 after hours down now almost five percent. One has to 0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.440 keep their feet on the ground and ask is that 0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.720 so severe? Is it so surprising given how high a 0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.520 bar this quarter was and how lofty expectations were. 0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.320 One hundred and fifty percent higher so far this year 0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.880 at five percent decline after earnings that beat estimates but 0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.400 didn't blow estimates out of the water. 0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.160 Well, I think you go to the outlook, like you 0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.960 keep you know, emphasizing ed this high idea and I 0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.480 know you put it out on the on the blog 0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.480 of what came in all right, better than what the 0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.520 average estimate was. But when you think about the high 0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.000 numbers that some were expecting almost as much as thirty 0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.120 eight billion dollars for that third corent revenue, like that 0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.520 is going to color how investors, you know, react to 0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.920 this number. They were expecting more, a lot more. 0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.840 Yeah, And like I know that this is something that 0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.640 Bloomberg people always say, but you also just have to 0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.960 give some sort of context of where the stock trades. Right, 0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.280 it is a stock that trades at thirty eight times 0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.560 forward twelve month earnings. Again, I always look at Relative 0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.120 Strength Index RSI and the terminal, but one data set 0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.119 that I've tracked is that retail investors have absolutely piled 0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:11.560 into this. 0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:12.240 Stock of late. 0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.640 It had all of the hallmarks of something that was 0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.760 set to swing in. I have direction based on options 0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.239 market trading, and I think the point that I'm making 0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.520 without telling our audience about how the sausage is made 0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.400 too much. One very wise editor said on our planning 0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.760 call that even if it beats expectations or street or 0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.040 consensus estimates, this is a likely outcome because of where 0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.319 we've positioned ourselves in the market going into the print. 0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.360 Meaning that expectations are just so high for this company. 0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:40.840 Correct. 0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.880 Yeah, Directs, I think, Tim, that's probably the understatement of 0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:45.480 the century. 0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.559 Well, you know, you're also dealing with base effects. As 0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.520 we mentioned, the comps are really tough given where this 0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.960 was a year ago and where investors expected to go 0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.319 in terms of growth rate. I mean, as Abigail do 0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.240 a little pointed out on our cair you know they 0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.760 were seeing what north of two hundred percent growth some quarters. 0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.560 Well, you know, this is something I used to think 0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.120 about with Apple, like when it didn't live up to expectations, 0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.319 it got harder and harder to move the needle on that. 0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.760 And yet when you look at the numbers and I 0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.600 understand it's all relative, and you've got to give the 0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.600 context in terms of growth and so on and so forth. 0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.160 And video is still selling a lot of stuff, right, 0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.960 and it is the game in town if you want 0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.440 those advanced AI chips. 0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.679 Okay, guys, I'm really sorry to go on attendent. These 0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.400 headlines are super important in videos saying it expects several 0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.880 billion dollars in Blackwell revenues in the fourth quarter. I 0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:37.959 King's just hit the button on the red headline. I'm 0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.360 not surprised. Yeah, that this was the question that in 0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.080 video makes a commitment to bring a new generation of 0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.320 its AI accelerator to market annually, and there have been 0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.719 the reporting on the design challenges about Blackwell. What in 0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.280 Vidia's confirming is that they will book really really significant 0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.080 revenue on that product in the early stage of its ramp, 0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.440 in the final three months of the calendar year or 0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.680 its fiscal fourth quarter. But they do make a concession 0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.360 that they had to change the Blackwell mask production step. 0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.480 I have to plead ignorance on the technicalities of that. 0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.320 I'm going to run to Ian's desk and ask him, 0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.280 but they are at least talking about it. 0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:14.000 I think that this. 0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.840 Commentary comes from not the earnings released necessarily, but the 0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.440 CFO commentary that comes as an appendix to it. 0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:22.280 So we'll dig into that as we go. 0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.520 Is several billion dollars not sufficient? 0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.080 Ed, what is several billion dollars? 0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.640 I mean the relatively significant after hours decline is now 0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.920 sort of less significant. That might give you a sense 0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.160 of how investors feel about that. But I think the 0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.000 idea was that, you know, this is a product that 0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.000 we're not talking I've said this to you guys so 0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.800 many times, and I almost don't apologize for it. When 0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.520 we talk about an AI chip, we're not talking about 0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.760 this little thing you can hold in your hand. The 0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.560 core technology, yes, is probably about the size of a sandwich, 0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.000 but it goes into a rack that goes into a server, 0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.200 a big three hundreundred pounds server box in rows and 0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.280 rows that fill out a data center. And that's the 0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.440 scale that we're talking about. So when you produce it 0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.360 at scale, it presents a challenge. And to me that 0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.120 the shipment of several billion dollars seems substantive in this instance. 0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.240 Yeah, it's interesting. I feel like, you know, we're going 0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.280 to want a little bit more in terms of specifics 0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.599 about Blackwell and what those shipments in terms of the 0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.520 fourth quarter what exactly means, because that's outlook fourth quarter 0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.640 not so far away, and you do wonder if that's 0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.280 something that moves the needle significantly. This is everything that 0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.520 you know people have been talking about. 0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.000 Hey, Ed, before we let you go, you have a 0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.920 conversation with Jensen coming up a little later, a special 0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.040 edition of Bloomberg Technology, an exclusive interview with Jensen Wong. 0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.640 Just the last forty five seconds we have with you, 0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.160 give us how without giving away the questions, tell us 0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.040 how you're thinking about this. 0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.439 Yeah, I think that you know me. I love details. 0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.920 So I'm going to ask about Blackwell, although it's Bloomberg 0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.480 policy not to give questions in advance of interview, and 0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.360 I'm sure somebody from Nvidia is listening, but that's the question. 0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.920 And then I heard you talking to remain boss Stick 0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.559 about his surprise that revenue comes from just five players. 0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.280 I thought I'd been saying that on our network every 0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:09.600 week the last two years. 0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.920 But that is the question. 0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.400 When do you move beyond that, you want to sell 0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.640 to smaller and medium sized enterprises, governments and other public institutions. 0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.920 Do you have some evidence that that's already happening. 0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.640 That's a point that Ian King brought up at the 0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.800 top of our two o'clock hour right here on Bloomberg 0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.000 TV in Bloomberg Radio. I'm going to tell Romaine to 0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.360 listen to you more, Ed, so he's not surprised in 0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:30.880 the future. 0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.840 Sy A lot going on, all. 0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.600 Right, Good luck, kiddo. With that, we'll be listening to 0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.760 that interview Ed La La, co host of Bloomberg Technology 0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.000 at Bloomberg TV and again Bloomberg Technology, we'll have that 0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.840 half hour special at six thirty pm Wall Street Time, 0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.960 highlighted by that exclusive interview that Ed will have with 0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.480 the CEO of Nvidio, Jensen Wog. And right now we've 0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.440 got Sure's of Nvidia down about five point one percent 0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.679 here in the aftermarket. 0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.880 Happening quickly. The reaction has been big. It was nothing 0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.400 and then it was more than it was eight percent. 0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:03.840 It was like three percent. 0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.320 Did you go down as much as eight percent at 0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.439 one point. It's been bouncing around and we've seen, yeah, 0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.840 some interesting moves here. And we are seeing as I mentioned, 0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.400 Naszak one undred many futures there down about two percent here, 0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.320 So we're seeing some drag. Not coming and done completely, 0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.400 but it's interesting. Let's see what Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Semiconductor 0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.040 Alice kun John Sabani has to say about that, he 0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.440 joins us. He's out there in our San Francisco bureau. 0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.839 All right, top of mind for you, cun John, tell 0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.520 us about the quarter? Do they do Okay? How's the outlook? 0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.440 It seems like there's a little bit of disappointment here. 0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.920 Yeah, I mean, I think they did really good as 0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.440 part of our expectations. I'm sure the Nvidia obsesses and 0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.400 might be disappointed given the magnitude of the beat, which 0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.640 we had called out to be in the single digit range, 0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:58.280 and especially against the lofty, unsustainable expectations that some of 0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.800 the again Nvidia opssis have been forming. But fundamentally in 0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.760 terms of long term, in terms of the competitive landscape, 0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.319 everything remains intact. We don't see any big risks out 0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:09.360 of this earning so far. 0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.320 Do you see any softness when it comes to the outlook? 0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.240 Even though it did it exceeded some expectations, it didn't 0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.160 exceed the loftiest expectations. Are you seeing signs of softness 0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.920 with its customers? 0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.000 I wouldn't call it a softness in terms of demand. 0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.720 I would rather call it more of a timing. I mean, 0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.520 in the given last thirty days, we have come to 0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.440 know about the black Well delays, right, But as we 0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.680 had called out in our preview, there's enough demand for 0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.840 the Hopper series and the supply for that has come along, 0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.480 so they have the ability to ship more and more 0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.960 to this demand, which kept them intact and the guidance 0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.360 still came to a bait. Of course, I think you know, 0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.840 the DLA might actually push out the magnitude of beat 0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.920 which we would have expected into twenty five calendar twenty five, 0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.600 which might actually drive increased to the upside of twenty 0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.920 five numbers. As we get more details on it. 0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.400 Help can textualize this for us in Video expects to 0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.800 ship several billion dollars of Blackwell revenue in the fourth 0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.480 quarter of the year. I feel like Carol, I'm parsing 0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:15.440 a fed statement here. 0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:16.720 It will kind of vague. 0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.560 What does several mean? Kun John? Is that a lot? 0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.000 Or is that disappointing to investors? 0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.840 I wouldn't call it completely disappointing. Again, given what we 0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.880 came to know over the last four weeks. When we 0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.080 were working on the previous two weeks ago, we thought 0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.120 it will be very little volume. So the several billion 0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.680 actually is good in a way and comforting that Okay, 0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.880 there will be some shipment, and it's not completely delayed 0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.280 until the first Q fiscal quarter, so I wouldn't call 0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.480 it completely disappointing. 0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:52.200 So we are watching big tech falling after Nvidia their results, 0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.800 as I mentioned, the Nasdaq one under many futures in 0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.120 the aftermarket down one point six percent. Uh, it's you know, 0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.080 I'm looking at the q Q that also we see 0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.400 it down about half a percent. I mean, when it 0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.040 comes to the AI story and the build out and 0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.720 the spend, you sound really comfortable with what we've got 0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.600 from Nvidia, that that narrative, that story, that actuality is 0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.440 still intact. Is that a fair assessment of how you 0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:18.880 see this? 0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.120 It is and given we look at the fundamentals, especially 0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.680 from a long term perspective, and not the magnitude of 0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.160 beat and race quarter to quarter. When you look at 0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.520 the disc earning season, almost all of the hyperscalers, the 0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.480 big internet companies, the big cloud players actually announced a 0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.560 beat to their capex and almost across the board to 0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.000 their revenues. Right, So that again validates like the demand 0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.240 is not slowing. Nothing has changed in the last two weeks, 0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.120 just given the Nvidia results. So I agree with your 0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.280 comment that we do feel comfortable around the broader dynamics 0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.400 and the demand tailwinds for the AI chips. 0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:55.960 So one of the things we just talked about with 0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.400 ur Ed Ludlow too, is when you look at the 0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:03.440 supply chain function on Nvidia their top customers, it's kind 0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.160 of a who's who of big megacap tech companies. Microsoft 0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.360 is their number one customer. Forty five percent of their 0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:16.080 cap X goes to Nvidia Meta number two customer, forty 0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.080 one percent of their CAPEX spend already goes to Nvidia 0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.560 Super micro Computer, which we've been talking about a lot 0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.080 in its woes or alleged woes that one about, I 0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.320 don't know. A big chunk of what they spend also 0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.680 goes to Nvidia. Alphabet is another one, almost fifty percent 0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:37.679 fifteen of their CAPEX goes to Nvideo. So you have 0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.439 enough confidence that those companies will continue to spend. They 0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.840 are so important right to the Nvidia growth story. So 0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.240 as long as you hear from them that they are spending, 0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:47.400 you're pretty confident. 0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.720 Exactly as long as we don't see any negative feedback 0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.480 from them publicly. The confidence that demains. One more point 0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.920 to highlight from the CFO commentary letter. This quarter there 0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.560 percentage of data center revenues from the cloud actually came 0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.359 down to forty five percent. It had been running over 0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.400 fifty percent over the last year. So this is even 0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.640 though on a magnetude terms, a small victory, I still 0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.119 see it as a positive direction that they're diversifying slightly 0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.119 slowly but away from the big cloud customers, and the 0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.919 enterprise and vertical segment is growing significantly faster. 0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:31.000 Okay, we got yeah. We heard from Ian King earlier 0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:36.000 and also from Ed Ludlow earlier about diversification of revenue 0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:41.280 Konjohn and the idea that the company is looking to 0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:48.080 get business from governments, smaller companies offloading work that usually 0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.720 would take place in the cloud to stuff that's on 0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:56.239 prem what's that business from your view look like? Are 0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:57.240 they making headway there? 0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.800 They are, definitely. And again the one clear sign is 0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.560 when you parse out the data center into sort of 0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.560 three buckets. One is the cloud customers, right, one is 0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.840 the enterprise, which is a much much more diverse but 0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.800 smaller pockets compared to the cloud, and the other one 0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.080 being the internet and vertical companies. We want to continue 0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.520 seeing the combination of these Internet vertical companies combined with 0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.760 enterprise continue to grow much faster than the cloud. Look, 0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.520 the cloud guys have the biggest wallets, so they are 0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.119 definitely going to drive a majority of the growth. But 0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.840 we want that percentage that moved from fifty to forty 0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.960 five to continue moving slower. At the same time, in 0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320 media revenues continue to grow as well. 0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.320 Just to reset everybody, because nvideo results they are out. 0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.280 They've been out now for I don't know about fifteen 0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.159 minutes or so. Our headline story written by Bloomberg's Ian King, 0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.320 who we talked to at two o'clock ahead of this. 0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.399 And Nvidia, which is really the chip maker at the 0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.160 heart of the artificial intelligence boom gave a revenue forecast 0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.480 that fell short of some of the most optimistic estimates. 0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.920 Token conser learns that its explosive growth is waning. Third 0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.760 quarter revenue will be about thirty two point five billion. 0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.800 The company just put that out. Analysts had predicted thirty 0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.920 one point nine billion on average, so that was a beat, 0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.560 but some estimates range as high as thirty seven point 0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.000 nine billion, so almost thirty eight billion sales in the 0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.879 fiscal second quarter, which ran through July. They though Tim 0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.159 did top analyst projection. 0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.840 I'm looking at Eddian King's commentary on our live blog, 0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:24.639 which you should all check out while you're listening to 0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.119 us on Bloomberg Radio or watching us on YouTube or 0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.240 Bloomberg Originals. He writes that most questions will zero in 0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.920 on how many billions of dollars in revenue Blackwell will 0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.680 generate in the fourth quarter. Yeah, that's that's the question 0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:37.439 we've been asking. 0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.639 Yeah, absolutely right, this is what we want to know. 0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.400 So you know, we're talking also with Bloomberg Intelligence Senior 0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.800 Semiconductor Alice Kunjohn Sabani who is joining us, and you 0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.199 seem very comfortable with the report. Stock now just down 0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.879 about one and a half percent, so there's been a 0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.840 lot of bouncing around in the aftermarket. What if you 0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.160 were sitting down with the CEO as our Ed Ludlow 0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.200 is going to be doing at six pm Wall Street 0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040 time or six is it six PMOS six six thirty 0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.879 pm Wall Street time? What would be some of your 0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.080 top questions that you'd want to ask? Jensen Wang, co 0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.800 founder and CEO of the company. 0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.680 Well, I would definitely want to get extract as much 0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.160 color as I can into the calendar. Twenty five outlook. 0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.520 I know he might not provide that, but any more 0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.840 color I can get on the volume or the dollar 0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.600 outlook for the Blackwell series would be really would shun 0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.440 all the concerns that we have right now and sort 0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.080 of put to bed all the uncertainty. 0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.160 All right. That really helps a lot because it does 0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.960 feel like it all comes down to Blackwell, right. It 0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.560 was kind of going in Kunjan, Thank you so much. 0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.280 Look forward to reading your research that'll come out a 0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.199 little bit later and into tomorrow. Bloomberg Intelligence senior semiconductor 0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.160 analysts kujoh and Sabani on those Nvidia earnings
Chapters
No chapters available.