Instant Reaction: Stocks Surge After Trump Statement

Bloomberg Daybreak: US Edition

Stocks and bonds rebounded after President Donald Trump said the US and Iran had “very good” conversations about an end to the conflict in the Middle East.  
President rump said strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure and power plants would be postponed for five days following the start of talks with Iran to end the war.  
For details on this development, Tom Keene and Paul Sweeney speak with Bloomberg Middle East Reporter Joumanna Bercetche, Silvercrest Asset Management Head of Investment Policy & Strategy Robert Teeter, and Veda Partners Co-Founder Henrietta Treyz.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

2026-03-23 7 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

This is breaking news update from Bloomberg Instant reaction and
analysis from our three thousand journalists and analysts around the world.
The President communicates with the world through his favorite messaging.
It is a very long tweet. I'm going to get
to the key sentence.
I've instructed the Department of War to postpone any and
all military strikes against Iranian power plans and energy infrastructure
for a five day period. Markets reverse and rocket nansdak
up two percent, standard impores five hundred, exploding up one
hundred and fifty points. Pault swinging your interpretation please.
I think a lot of folks has been waiting for
this social media post. At some point, President Trump's just
going to say enough is enough and maybe perhaps think
about moving on.
We are fortunate to have Jaman and Brissetti here, Jamana.
I guess this raises a question in to the extent
that President Trump is looking here as this tweet suggests
to kind of step back and wind down operations in
that part of the world. Is there a sense that
that's the right move at this point, or is it
their sense that boy, the US has broken this part
of the world and to be up for others to
deal with it.
Look, I think there's a big question about what exactly
the US are trying to achieve here in all of
the mixed messaging that has come through this weekend. We
woke up in the morning on Saturday to use that
President Trump was thinking of a military windown, only a
few hours later to put up this forty eighth our
ultimatum to Iran, a threat to attack their power plants.
And we know that, as I just mentioned to you,
that would constitute a real existential threat to many of
these Gulf sites and desalination plants specifically, they have been
putting a lot of pressure, most likely on the US
administration not to follow through on that threat. But at
the same time, the fact that he's pushed it back
by five days suggests that the threat of them acting
is still there. And then equally alongside that they are
own reporting suggests that the US are weighing up the
possibility of taking over karg Islands. I think thousands of
more marines to the region as well, And so anyway
you look at it, it does seem like this war
is going to go on for a couple of weeks
rather than a couple of days. Irrespective of the posts
that he just put up.
Now, Jubona, please stay with us. I have to do
a market check here to keep it going.
Oil plunges, a dollar comes in weaker right now as well.
Also gold Tom Gold is down about three point seven
percent forty four hundred dollars per ounce. Robert Teeter, chief
investment strategist to Silver Crest Asset Management, Robert, you walked
into the door probably with one set of expectations. Now
we're here here with one tweet later or one social
media post later. The world's changed yet again. How do
you put that in context? Yeah?
Absolutely. You know, it's been very much a day by
day environment here, and I think this really speaks to
it as well. You know, you've had a market that
corrected sort of gradually as it went through this process,
rather than some of the prior events we've had where
you had a really big, significant decline and then you
sort of work your way back. And I think that
was the market's expectation that this day would come at
some point, So it was a step by step, day
by day adjustment. Because we sit here today, the critical
element will be if this is a five day window,
do we start to get ships and commodities and oil
flowing through the Strait in the next five days. The
timing sets up interestingly. As I look at it, you know,
this is something that could be contained to first quarter
in terms of any type of disruption that companies want
to blame this on. So if you get oil moving
in the next five days, then I think we're right
back pretty quickly to a pretty normal environment where investors
are looking at second quarter, third quarter and beyond. If
you get no traffic through the straight over the five days,
it's you know, you still have to be a little
bit careful here he.
Did the bond market tell the president what to do?
I mean, at a seismic shift in bonds, the bond
market shifted.
I mean, I'm sorry, bonds lead stocks absolutely. Bond market
a powerful player here. If you want to call it
the bond vigilantes, you could. This is a very strong
message the bond market was sending and saying something needs
to happen and soon. Now we've had commentary before that
indicated that perhaps we were towards the end of the conflict,
and so again for me, it's a one very metric.
I look here on Bloomberg at ecan and look at
the traffic through the strait, and hopefully over the next
few days and weeks we'll start to see some numbers
sticking up there.
I guess if you're the Fed here, inflation was something
that probably had your attention a little bit more than
expected the last meaning maybe this suggests that there may
be a little easing on that front, a little bit
on the at least on the energy sign.
Yeah, I think that's right again, especially if traffic starts
flowing through the strait, then yes, you get alleviation and
oil prices that they're seeing here this morning. That alleviates
some of the stress in terms of commodities across the board,
not just oil but other commodities as well, and the
pass through effect that puts the FED in a much
better spot. I hesitate to say that we'd get back
to normal right away, but I think pretty quickly we
can get back to normal in terms of balanced outlook,
with a bias towards a cut later in the year.
If you get a weak employment print. Our view had
always been that you will get a weak employment print
at some point. It might be a blip and that'll
be what gives the FED the catalyst to respond.
Thank you for our first view of the morning, Robert Tetter,
I greatly appreciate ahead of investment policy and strategy. Silvercrest
Asset Management, Paul I just did a fancy chart off
dal Jones industrial average futures. It's incredibly elegant chart. We
are down in the gloom of perfect two standard deviations
and we've bounced right up to my key middle term
moving average line.
We have a long way to go on the Dow
to get back to normal.
By seeing the Dow up a thousand, you don't see
that every day. So again, market's moving on, trying to
digest what this means in the next several days, of
what it means over the next several weeks.
So stay on it.
Perfect timing to speak with Henrietta, Trey's co founder Veda Partners,
just wonderful on the pulse of Washington. Henrietta, who did
the President listen to? Who did he take counsel from
to make this reversal in policy?
Well, you can really pick your target. It could be
the immigration polling data, It could be the fact that
Congress is not going to pass this two hundred billion
dollars supplemental spending requests for many months now. It could
be the prices that are increasing nationwide. It could be
the fact that you can't you know online the Jones
Act and expected to offset closure of the straight up
Woor moves. But the economic data sets going into a
INTRM election cycle are a problem that you know, the
president created and he has to fix. There's no interplay
with Congress here, so it makes sense that he be
the executor sort of implementing change and winding things back
as becomes completely untenable for the American Republic to support
him going into metroal elections.
But you go right to where I wanted to go next.
Who is the interplay with his an inner circle? Who
is he talking to within his inner circle or is
this a president alone?
I think it's got to be an expansive set on everybody,
from the fundraisers and the donors, to the political campaigns,
the down ballot Democrats excuse me, Republicans, as well as
his own cabinet that is continuing to see polling data
come in over and over and over again saying that
the American public does not support the war. You might
have ninety four percent of the magabase, but you've lost everybody,
including a huge majority of independence. So when you look
at those data sets, it doesn't matter who enters the room.
If it's your energy secretary, your transportation secretary, your secretary
of defense, all those people are getting negative feedback from
the Pentagon to state Department

Chapters

No chapters available.