Reticulated Python

Divided Argument

We continue our breakneck pace and dig into two substantive criminal law opinions: Fischer v. United States and Snyder v. United States

2024-08-01 71 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

Will: Yeah. Although again, I'm not sure it's a change in the-- What I like about this is when the court granted Snyder, I was like, “Oh, I think I know what they're going to say.” I don't really understand why, but I know what they're going to say.” The court granted Fischer. I was like, “Obviously they're going to rule for the [unintelligible dissent, even if you read the statute and don't think that's the way the court normally interpret statutes.” And one classic critique of that is, “Oh, the court is unprincipled and just likes corrupt mayors and insurrectionists, or what they call them, rioters in Fischer.” But I like the attempt to say that, “No, there's a different thing going on here. And this is what's going on here, even if it's not going on all the time.”

Chapters

No chapters available.