From quantum curiosity to quantum computers: the 2025 Nobel Prize for Physics

Physics World Weekly Podcast

This year’s Nobel Prize for Physics went to John Clarke, Michel Devoret and John Martinis “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantization in an electric circuit”.

That circuit was a superconducting device called a Josephson junction and their work in the 1980s led to the development of some of today’s most promising technologies for quantum computers.

To chat about this year’s laureates, and the wide-reaching scientific and technological consequences of their work I am joined by Ilana Wisby – who is a quantum physicist, deep tech entrepreneur and former CEO of UK-based Oxford Quantum Circuits. We chat about the trio’s breakthrough and its influence on today’s quantum science and technology.

This podcast is supported by American Elements, the world’s leading manufacturer of engineered and advanced materials. The company’s ability to scale laboratory breakthroughs to industrial production has contributed to many of the most significant technological advancements since 1990 – including LED lighting, smartphones, and electric vehicles.

2025-10-09 33 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

1
00:00:07,759 --> 00:00:10,719
Hello, and welcome to the Physics World weekly

2
00:00:10,719 --> 00:00:12,740
podcast. I'm Hamish Johnston.

3
00:00:13,184 --> 00:00:15,184
In this episode, we're going to chat about

4
00:00:15,184 --> 00:00:16,885
the 2025

5
00:00:17,265 --> 00:00:18,804
Nobel Prize for Physics,

6
00:00:19,265 --> 00:00:21,125
which has been awarded to three

7
00:00:21,504 --> 00:00:24,244
pioneers in the field of superconducting

8
00:00:24,864 --> 00:00:26,004
quantum circuits.

9
00:00:26,649 --> 00:00:28,670
But first, I'd like to acknowledge

10
00:00:29,130 --> 00:00:31,550
the generous support of American

11
00:00:31,850 --> 00:00:32,350
Elements

12
00:00:32,810 --> 00:00:34,030
for this episode.

13
00:00:35,850 --> 00:00:36,909
American Elements,

14
00:00:37,689 --> 00:00:41,149
the world's manufacturer of engineered and advanced materials.

15
00:00:43,125 --> 00:00:44,184
American elements,

16
00:00:45,284 --> 00:00:46,024
now invent.

17
00:00:51,045 --> 00:00:53,465
On Tuesday morning, John Clark,

18
00:00:53,924 --> 00:00:55,225
Michelle Devoret,

19
00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:57,020
and John Martinez

20
00:00:57,479 --> 00:01:00,460
bagged this year's Nobel Prize for Physics

21
00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:01,739
for the discovery

22
00:01:02,119 --> 00:01:03,100
of macroscopic

23
00:01:03,799 --> 00:01:05,579
quantum mechanical tunneling

24
00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:07,420
and energy quantization

25
00:01:08,119 --> 00:01:09,579
in an electric circuit.

26
00:01:10,254 --> 00:01:12,034
That circuit was a superconducting

27
00:01:12,334 --> 00:01:14,994
device called a Josephson junction,

28
00:01:15,454 --> 00:01:18,015
and their work, which was done in the

29
00:01:18,015 --> 00:01:18,994
nineteen eighties,

30
00:01:19,295 --> 00:01:20,435
has led directly

31
00:01:20,814 --> 00:01:23,314
to a leading family of nascent

32
00:01:23,694 --> 00:01:24,834
quantum computers

33
00:01:25,299 --> 00:01:28,579
that are being developed by tech giants and

34
00:01:28,579 --> 00:01:29,799
startups alike.

35
00:01:30,659 --> 00:01:32,200
These use superconducting

36
00:01:32,659 --> 00:01:36,359
circuits as quantum bits, and their physical form,

37
00:01:36,659 --> 00:01:37,159
resembling

38
00:01:37,459 --> 00:01:38,200
a glittering

39
00:01:38,500 --> 00:01:39,719
copper chandelier,

40
00:01:40,355 --> 00:01:43,174
has become an icon of quantum computing.

41
00:01:44,275 --> 00:01:46,995
To chat about this year's laureates and the

42
00:01:46,995 --> 00:01:47,895
wide reaching

43
00:01:48,355 --> 00:01:49,814
scientific and technological

44
00:01:50,435 --> 00:01:52,055
consequences of their work,

45
00:01:52,435 --> 00:01:54,935
I'm joined by Ilana Whisby,

46
00:01:55,530 --> 00:01:57,230
who is a quantum physicist,

47
00:01:58,010 --> 00:01:59,310
deep tech entrepreneur,

48
00:01:59,849 --> 00:02:00,670
and former

49
00:02:01,129 --> 00:02:01,629
CEO

50
00:02:02,010 --> 00:02:02,989
of Oxford

51
00:02:03,290 --> 00:02:04,349
Quantum Circuits.

52
00:02:04,810 --> 00:02:05,709
Hi, Ilana.

53
00:02:06,010 --> 00:02:07,310
Welcome to the podcast.

54
00:02:08,215 --> 00:02:09,914
Hi. Thanks so much for having me.

55
00:02:10,375 --> 00:02:12,534
Yeah. Thanks for coming on, Alana.

56
00:02:12,854 --> 00:02:14,634
You know, when when we thought about

57
00:02:14,935 --> 00:02:16,854
how to cover this in the podcast, I

58
00:02:16,854 --> 00:02:17,914
was really keen

59
00:02:18,215 --> 00:02:19,354
on getting somebody,

60
00:02:20,055 --> 00:02:21,914
with a sort of industrial

61
00:02:22,215 --> 00:02:23,275
commercial background

62
00:02:23,740 --> 00:02:26,139
and a bit of experience with the sort

63
00:02:26,139 --> 00:02:27,439
of quantum technology

64
00:02:27,740 --> 00:02:31,259
that these, three laureates developed. Because I know

65
00:02:31,259 --> 00:02:33,180
it's, you know, it's it's it's had a

66
00:02:33,180 --> 00:02:34,319
very important

67
00:02:34,860 --> 00:02:35,360
implications

68
00:02:35,659 --> 00:02:38,620
in the, sort of, quantum computing industry. So

69
00:02:38,620 --> 00:02:39,555
it's really great,

70
00:02:40,275 --> 00:02:41,414
to have you on.

71
00:02:41,794 --> 00:02:44,534
And as someone who's worked with superconducting

72
00:02:45,314 --> 00:02:47,555
qubits, I'm guessing that you're very pleased with

73
00:02:47,555 --> 00:02:50,215
this Nobel Prize. You seemed very pleased yesterday

74
00:02:50,354 --> 00:02:52,614
when I first contacted you about it.

75
00:02:53,049 --> 00:02:55,289
Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, the whole the whole

76
00:02:55,289 --> 00:02:58,489
field, the whole ecosystem is obviously delighted. I

77
00:02:58,489 --> 00:03:00,509
can probably talk on behalf of them

78
00:03:00,810 --> 00:03:02,189
at that point in time.

79
00:03:02,729 --> 00:03:04,750
I mean, really because the prize recognises,

80
00:03:06,534 --> 00:03:09,014
the experiment, really, that was a foundation for

81
00:03:09,014 --> 00:03:09,514
turning

82
00:03:09,814 --> 00:03:11,675
a theory about atoms

83
00:03:12,375 --> 00:03:15,435
into the field we have today with, superconducting

84
00:03:15,814 --> 00:03:17,189
quantum circuits, which

85
00:03:17,510 --> 00:03:20,969
underpins quantum computing and and so, so many

86
00:03:21,510 --> 00:03:24,409
other things. So, yeah, we're certainly absolutely, absolutely

87
00:03:24,469 --> 00:03:25,530
delighted, especially

88
00:03:26,150 --> 00:03:26,650
considering,

89
00:03:27,189 --> 00:03:29,205
it's the international year of quantum.

90
00:03:30,085 --> 00:03:32,004
So I think the timing as well is

91
00:03:32,004 --> 00:03:32,905
is particularly,

92
00:03:33,444 --> 00:03:35,064
particularly poignant for us.

93
00:03:35,685 --> 00:03:38,004
That's right. Yeah. I it's we we you

94
00:03:38,004 --> 00:03:40,104
know, on Physics World, we do make predictions

95
00:03:40,165 --> 00:03:42,245
every year about who's going to win the

96
00:03:42,245 --> 00:03:43,685
the Nobel Prize. And,

97
00:03:44,330 --> 00:03:46,750
and this year, you know, I think possibly

98
00:03:46,810 --> 00:03:48,650
influenced by the fact that it is the

99
00:03:48,650 --> 00:03:50,909
International Year of Quantum Science and Technology.

100
00:03:51,849 --> 00:03:54,650
We did go for a quantum prize, but,

101
00:03:54,650 --> 00:03:56,490
of course, we got we we we were

102
00:03:56,490 --> 00:03:58,330
completely wrong. We we thought it was gonna

103
00:03:58,330 --> 00:03:59,069
be quantum

104
00:03:59,465 --> 00:04:01,004
algorithms, you know, the theory

105
00:04:01,305 --> 00:04:03,625
of quantum computing. And instead, of course, it

106
00:04:03,625 --> 00:04:04,925
was the exact opposite.

107
00:04:06,185 --> 00:04:08,344
It was the people who did the hard

108
00:04:08,344 --> 00:04:08,844
work,

109
00:04:09,465 --> 00:04:10,525
and and built,

110
00:04:11,385 --> 00:04:13,724
I suppose, the the some of the earliest,

111
00:04:14,389 --> 00:04:14,889
qubits.

112
00:04:15,590 --> 00:04:16,089
So

113
00:04:16,470 --> 00:04:19,029
can you explain how the work done in

114
00:04:19,029 --> 00:04:20,569
the eighties by Clark,

115
00:04:21,750 --> 00:04:22,250
Devore,

116
00:04:22,790 --> 00:04:23,689
and Martinez

117
00:04:24,310 --> 00:04:25,769
has led to the superconducting

118
00:04:26,470 --> 00:04:27,850
qubits and processors

119
00:04:28,584 --> 00:04:30,504
that we have today. So what did they

120
00:04:30,504 --> 00:04:32,985
do back then? And and, how did it

121
00:04:32,985 --> 00:04:33,784
lead to,

122
00:04:34,745 --> 00:04:36,604
the quantum computers of today?

123
00:04:36,985 --> 00:04:38,764
Yeah. I mean, I can I can certainly

124
00:04:38,985 --> 00:04:40,904
do my best to whiz you through a

125
00:04:40,904 --> 00:04:43,144
little bit of history, but also then, of

126
00:04:43,144 --> 00:04:45,629
course, the impact that it's had, in shaping

127
00:04:45,629 --> 00:04:48,029
today's industry as well as kind of fields?

128
00:04:48,029 --> 00:04:48,529
But

129
00:04:48,830 --> 00:04:50,830
I think maybe if I zoom out and

130
00:04:50,830 --> 00:04:52,290
do a bit of history first,

131
00:04:52,830 --> 00:04:55,230
but before I do that, that verdict upfront,

132
00:04:55,230 --> 00:04:56,264
what they actually did,

133
00:04:57,305 --> 00:05:00,525
between Clark, Taberae, and Martinez is prove effectively

134
00:05:00,585 --> 00:05:01,884
that a manmade

135
00:05:02,665 --> 00:05:03,805
electronic circuit,

136
00:05:04,824 --> 00:05:08,045
can behave as one quantum object.

137
00:05:08,585 --> 00:05:11,180
So that single result is really what has

138
00:05:11,180 --> 00:05:13,199
led us to be able to engineer,

139
00:05:14,220 --> 00:05:16,699
quantum behaviour on chips, which is obviously the

140
00:05:16,699 --> 00:05:17,839
field of superconducting

141
00:05:18,379 --> 00:05:19,360
quantum circuits,

142
00:05:20,379 --> 00:05:21,199
which underpins

143
00:05:21,544 --> 00:05:23,944
a huge amount of the quantum computing industry

144
00:05:23,944 --> 00:05:25,564
and and how it runs today.

145
00:05:26,745 --> 00:05:28,824
So we just take a a quick step

146
00:05:28,824 --> 00:05:31,144
back. But before the nineteen eighties, I think

147
00:05:31,144 --> 00:05:33,384
it's probably worth putting it a little bit

148
00:05:33,384 --> 00:05:35,165
into context of what we knew

149
00:05:35,699 --> 00:05:38,019
already, kind of the ecosystem that they were

150
00:05:38,019 --> 00:05:39,000
operating in.

151
00:05:40,100 --> 00:05:41,879
So if we start they had superconductivity.

152
00:05:42,259 --> 00:05:43,319
Right? That was understood,

153
00:05:43,779 --> 00:05:46,519
that you could cool materials and electrons

154
00:05:47,220 --> 00:05:49,404
pair up and flow in kind of Cooper

155
00:05:49,404 --> 00:05:51,324
pairs. So it was like ECS theory. This

156
00:05:51,324 --> 00:05:53,245
was kind of already a theory that was

157
00:05:53,245 --> 00:05:56,204
understood and actually earned the 1972

158
00:05:56,204 --> 00:05:57,185
Nobel Prize.

159
00:05:57,805 --> 00:05:59,254
There was also this other additional,

160
00:06:00,330 --> 00:06:01,930
concept that wasn't just a concept or a

161
00:06:01,930 --> 00:06:04,350
theory. It was also demonstrated in experimentation.

162
00:06:04,810 --> 00:06:05,550
And that was

163
00:06:05,930 --> 00:06:08,589
that those Cooper pairs can start tunnelling

164
00:06:08,889 --> 00:06:10,910
and you can use tunnelling as a tool.

165
00:06:11,050 --> 00:06:13,165
What that really means is that this kind

166
00:06:13,165 --> 00:06:16,444
of quantum mechanical effect allows particles to slip

167
00:06:16,444 --> 00:06:17,665
through barriers.

168
00:06:18,524 --> 00:06:20,785
And it was used as this measuring

169
00:06:21,324 --> 00:06:21,824
instrument.

170
00:06:23,165 --> 00:06:24,145
In semiconductors,

171
00:06:25,669 --> 00:06:28,469
it was shown in in devices there. There

172
00:06:28,469 --> 00:06:31,050
was also tunnel junctions for spectrometers

173
00:06:31,509 --> 00:06:33,909
in the superconducting kind of energy gap piece.

174
00:06:33,909 --> 00:06:35,930
And of course, Brian Josephson

175
00:06:36,629 --> 00:06:37,849
had first predicted

176
00:06:38,149 --> 00:06:39,930
that there was this superconducting

177
00:06:41,185 --> 00:06:41,685
insulator,

178
00:06:41,985 --> 00:06:42,485
superconducting

179
00:06:42,865 --> 00:06:44,805
kind of stack that could be created,

180
00:06:45,345 --> 00:06:47,925
which we call the the Josephson junction,

181
00:06:48,944 --> 00:06:51,524
in which pairs of electrons could tunnel

182
00:06:51,824 --> 00:06:52,324
together,

183
00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:55,919
in a a zero voltage super current. And,

184
00:06:55,919 --> 00:06:57,699
effectively, you can have,

185
00:06:58,319 --> 00:07:00,399
this kind of tunnelling effect. And that was

186
00:07:00,399 --> 00:07:00,899
demonstrated

187
00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:03,220
already within what we call SQUIDs,

188
00:07:04,079 --> 00:07:05,939
which were very, very sensitive,

189
00:07:06,879 --> 00:07:07,379
magnetometers.

190
00:07:08,235 --> 00:07:10,555
And again, that one was also recognized by

191
00:07:10,555 --> 00:07:11,594
the 1973

192
00:07:11,594 --> 00:07:14,154
Nobel prize. So I think all of this

193
00:07:14,154 --> 00:07:15,454
is really useful background

194
00:07:16,154 --> 00:07:16,654
context,

195
00:07:17,514 --> 00:07:19,454
as to the environment,

196
00:07:20,474 --> 00:07:22,720
that these three were kind of operating in.

197
00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:24,019
But the question that

198
00:07:24,399 --> 00:07:26,560
they really went out to answer was was

199
00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:28,579
a bigger question. It was like, can

200
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:30,819
an electrical circuit itself

201
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:32,500
show

202
00:07:32,879 --> 00:07:33,379
unmistakably

203
00:07:34,079 --> 00:07:35,060
quantum behavior

204
00:07:35,439 --> 00:07:36,579
in the same way

205
00:07:36,879 --> 00:07:37,785
that an atom does?

206
00:07:38,584 --> 00:07:40,985
And that question is super important because if

207
00:07:40,985 --> 00:07:42,985
the answer to that is yes, which effectively

208
00:07:42,985 --> 00:07:44,845
they were able to go out and prove,

209
00:07:45,305 --> 00:07:45,805
then

210
00:07:46,105 --> 00:07:48,524
that would basically mean you can create

211
00:07:48,904 --> 00:07:49,404
human

212
00:07:49,865 --> 00:07:50,365
artificial

213
00:07:50,904 --> 00:07:51,404
atoms

214
00:07:52,459 --> 00:07:54,079
mechanically engineered through

215
00:07:54,699 --> 00:07:55,839
electronic circuits.

216
00:07:57,660 --> 00:07:58,160
So.

217
00:07:58,939 --> 00:07:59,439
Really

218
00:07:59,979 --> 00:08:02,060
the team, when the three guys were over

219
00:08:02,060 --> 00:08:03,919
in Berkeley, they asked that question.

220
00:08:04,860 --> 00:08:05,360
And

221
00:08:06,145 --> 00:08:07,504
that question was really at that point in

222
00:08:07,504 --> 00:08:09,504
time, can it behave like a single quantum

223
00:08:09,504 --> 00:08:11,345
object? And what they did was they ran

224
00:08:11,345 --> 00:08:13,685
very tightly shielded, very kind of complex

225
00:08:13,985 --> 00:08:17,425
engineering to fully characterise this kind of experiment.

226
00:08:17,425 --> 00:08:18,865
And what they were able to prove is

227
00:08:18,865 --> 00:08:21,590
is two key facts that classical physics

228
00:08:22,210 --> 00:08:23,189
could not explain.

229
00:08:24,689 --> 00:08:27,810
The first was this concept of macroscopic quantum

230
00:08:27,810 --> 00:08:29,670
tunneling. So below

231
00:08:30,050 --> 00:08:32,049
specific temperature, they had this so that you

232
00:08:32,049 --> 00:08:33,834
can't put it into context. They had a

233
00:08:33,834 --> 00:08:34,334
superconducting

234
00:08:34,634 --> 00:08:35,134
circuit,

235
00:08:35,595 --> 00:08:36,495
probably within

236
00:08:36,875 --> 00:08:37,534
a a cryostat,

237
00:08:37,914 --> 00:08:39,355
a a very cool type,

238
00:08:39,754 --> 00:08:41,615
environment where you had your,

239
00:08:42,955 --> 00:08:45,375
your your metal, in a a superconducting,

240
00:08:46,875 --> 00:08:48,014
low TC manner.

241
00:08:49,210 --> 00:08:50,730
And what they were able to do was

242
00:08:50,730 --> 00:08:51,549
create an engineer,

243
00:08:52,009 --> 00:08:53,149
single trace in junction.

244
00:08:54,170 --> 00:08:56,009
And through that trace in junction, they were

245
00:08:56,009 --> 00:08:57,850
able to demonstrate the rate at which the

246
00:08:57,850 --> 00:08:58,350
device,

247
00:08:59,210 --> 00:09:02,429
leaves a non zero voltage state becomes independent

248
00:09:02,490 --> 00:09:02,955
on temperature.

249
00:09:03,754 --> 00:09:05,595
And what that was proving was that if

250
00:09:05,595 --> 00:09:07,754
it were an ordinary kind of thermal escape

251
00:09:07,754 --> 00:09:09,215
of this experiment they were doing,

252
00:09:10,075 --> 00:09:12,154
then colder wouldn't always been slower and it

253
00:09:12,154 --> 00:09:14,315
didn't. So this was the first point is

254
00:09:14,315 --> 00:09:16,715
that they were to prove this macroscopic quantum

255
00:09:16,715 --> 00:09:17,774
tunneling existed

256
00:09:18,190 --> 00:09:21,230
within that type of, of, of environment. The

257
00:09:21,230 --> 00:09:21,730
second

258
00:09:22,110 --> 00:09:24,910
was this discrete energy step in the circuit,

259
00:09:24,910 --> 00:09:26,930
which really underpins this nonlinearity

260
00:09:27,310 --> 00:09:29,310
for creating an artificial atom. So what they

261
00:09:29,310 --> 00:09:30,850
were able to do was apply

262
00:09:31,394 --> 00:09:33,654
these precise kind of microwave

263
00:09:34,035 --> 00:09:36,375
tones, I. E, specific microwave frequencies

264
00:09:37,555 --> 00:09:38,535
to this junction.

265
00:09:39,154 --> 00:09:41,154
And the device would would be able to

266
00:09:41,154 --> 00:09:44,035
identify, okay, this voltage change, this Cooper pair

267
00:09:44,035 --> 00:09:44,535
tunneling

268
00:09:45,190 --> 00:09:47,850
at specific frequencies at the right harmonics

269
00:09:48,230 --> 00:09:51,850
exactly where the quantum theory predicted it at.

270
00:09:51,990 --> 00:09:53,269
And they were, of course, able to do

271
00:09:53,269 --> 00:09:54,009
that reproducibly

272
00:09:54,629 --> 00:09:57,509
with, you know, significant rigor and show effectively

273
00:09:57,829 --> 00:09:59,509
sorry, it's hard to explain without going a

274
00:09:59,509 --> 00:10:00,164
little bit,

275
00:10:00,725 --> 00:10:02,485
kind of into the quantum physics, but the,

276
00:10:02,485 --> 00:10:04,725
the phase is a collective variable on this

277
00:10:04,725 --> 00:10:07,924
device, which contains billions of electrons has actually

278
00:10:07,924 --> 00:10:08,664
got quantum

279
00:10:09,445 --> 00:10:09,945
quantized

280
00:10:10,404 --> 00:10:11,464
energy and tunnels.

281
00:10:11,845 --> 00:10:13,704
So effectively proving out

282
00:10:14,230 --> 00:10:15,049
in experimentation,

283
00:10:16,070 --> 00:10:17,129
the quantum mechanics

284
00:10:17,590 --> 00:10:19,129
from atoms and ions

285
00:10:19,590 --> 00:10:20,090
to

286
00:10:20,629 --> 00:10:21,129
engineered

287
00:10:21,590 --> 00:10:24,490
superconducting circuits. And this is absolutely

288
00:10:25,029 --> 00:10:26,009
Nobel Prize

289
00:10:26,504 --> 00:10:29,165
worthy. Right? Seeing quantum behaviour

290
00:10:29,545 --> 00:10:31,245
demonstrated in a macroscopic

291
00:10:32,425 --> 00:10:33,565
manmade circuit,

292
00:10:34,105 --> 00:10:36,045
not just in kind of microscopic

293
00:10:36,504 --> 00:10:39,565
particles as we'd understood it before. Absolutely huge.

294
00:10:39,980 --> 00:10:42,860
The fact that there was complete kind of

295
00:10:42,860 --> 00:10:43,360
unambiguity

296
00:10:44,299 --> 00:10:45,440
in the evidence,

297
00:10:46,620 --> 00:10:49,740
both the temperature independent escape, as well as

298
00:10:49,740 --> 00:10:51,279
that microwave resolved

299
00:10:51,659 --> 00:10:54,319
step, they rule out classical explanations.

300
00:10:55,304 --> 00:10:57,705
And then of course, most importantly, from my

301
00:10:57,705 --> 00:10:59,725
perspective, the impact that that has,

302
00:11:00,105 --> 00:11:01,004
it unlocks

303
00:11:01,705 --> 00:11:03,884
a toolkit, a mindset that,

304
00:11:04,504 --> 00:11:07,225
Devray in particular was able to take on

305
00:11:07,225 --> 00:11:10,445
and really became the foundation for circuit QED,

306
00:11:11,279 --> 00:11:12,580
circuit quantum electrodynamics,

307
00:11:13,519 --> 00:11:16,419
which is really the foundations for modern superconducting

308
00:11:16,959 --> 00:11:17,459
qubits,

309
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:19,459
quantum limited amplifiers.

310
00:11:20,639 --> 00:11:22,100
And a part which actually

311
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:24,240
I really want to touch on as well

312
00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:24,740
is

313
00:11:25,424 --> 00:11:26,485
the human aspect.

314
00:11:26,865 --> 00:11:29,184
If we, if we look at kind of

315
00:11:29,184 --> 00:11:31,205
the, the, the way that these

316
00:11:31,745 --> 00:11:32,485
three individuals

317
00:11:32,865 --> 00:11:35,044
both ran their research group,

318
00:11:36,225 --> 00:11:39,125
across Berkeley, you know, where Devore came from,

319
00:11:39,184 --> 00:11:40,919
went across to Saclay, Martinez,

320
00:11:41,879 --> 00:11:44,120
Martina's, of course, going on to to Google

321
00:11:44,120 --> 00:11:44,620
and,

322
00:11:45,720 --> 00:11:48,279
and Clark's kind of Berkeley Lab as well.

323
00:11:48,279 --> 00:11:50,600
Like, if you look at the human impact,

324
00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:53,000
the training that they had in the fields

325
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:55,720
that they then kind of coined, like, I've

326
00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:56,534
always thought of

327
00:11:57,254 --> 00:11:59,674
these people and this seminal paper, which

328
00:12:00,294 --> 00:12:02,315
when I was doing quantum

329
00:12:02,934 --> 00:12:03,434
physics,

330
00:12:03,894 --> 00:12:06,714
quantum mechanics before even going to the laboratory,

331
00:12:06,774 --> 00:12:08,694
these were papers I had read. And they're

332
00:12:08,694 --> 00:12:09,899
papers that pretty much

333
00:12:10,460 --> 00:12:12,860
every single person that operates in the space

334
00:12:12,860 --> 00:12:15,660
will have, have recognized, or, you know, maybe

335
00:12:15,660 --> 00:12:17,680
you've looked at Martinez's lectures,

336
00:12:18,220 --> 00:12:20,480
or Jeffrey's lecture notes. And,

337
00:12:20,860 --> 00:12:22,924
and I think it's, it's also this

338
00:12:23,625 --> 00:12:24,764
kind of human spawning

339
00:12:25,225 --> 00:12:26,365
as well as the technical

340
00:12:26,985 --> 00:12:27,485
spawning,

341
00:12:28,264 --> 00:12:30,044
that these almost like godfathers

342
00:12:30,424 --> 00:12:31,245
of the field,

343
00:12:33,144 --> 00:12:36,105
we're able to, to kind of catalyze with,

344
00:12:36,105 --> 00:12:39,379
with this work. So, Alana, the the superconducting

345
00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:42,879
qubits that, that we see today, and, you

346
00:12:42,879 --> 00:12:43,379
know,

347
00:12:43,840 --> 00:12:47,220
these these are used in in quantum processors

348
00:12:47,360 --> 00:12:50,315
that are that have been developed by huge

349
00:12:50,455 --> 00:12:53,355
companies and and small startups alike.

350
00:12:53,735 --> 00:12:54,955
Are are the superconducting

351
00:12:55,975 --> 00:12:56,475
devices

352
00:12:56,934 --> 00:12:58,075
today, are they

353
00:12:58,934 --> 00:13:00,554
very similar to what,

354
00:13:01,174 --> 00:13:02,315
the Nobel laureates

355
00:13:02,660 --> 00:13:05,220
developed in the mid eighties? Or are they

356
00:13:05,220 --> 00:13:06,600
essentially better versions

357
00:13:07,220 --> 00:13:09,300
of of what they developed? Or or has

358
00:13:09,300 --> 00:13:10,680
the technology evolved

359
00:13:11,059 --> 00:13:12,600
quite a bit since then?

360
00:13:13,300 --> 00:13:16,740
Yeah. Thankfully, of course, technology has evolved, quite

361
00:13:16,740 --> 00:13:17,800
a bit from then.

362
00:13:18,584 --> 00:13:20,825
But really this is this moment was kind

363
00:13:20,825 --> 00:13:22,044
of that that first

364
00:13:22,584 --> 00:13:25,065
experimental proof point, right, that you could start

365
00:13:25,065 --> 00:13:27,705
to manufacture or create some sort of manmade

366
00:13:27,705 --> 00:13:28,205
circuit,

367
00:13:29,384 --> 00:13:31,004
with this property that

368
00:13:31,384 --> 00:13:32,845
then turns into these,

369
00:13:33,225 --> 00:13:35,680
these cubits, right, where you've got your LC

370
00:13:35,680 --> 00:13:38,100
oscillator with your specific Joseph's junction,

371
00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:40,800
within now at first, when they first tried

372
00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:43,040
to create cubits and control it, the quantum

373
00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:43,940
information processing.

374
00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:47,200
My understanding is that, actually, they were looking

375
00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:49,040
at it from a different approach with with

376
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:50,524
charge based mechanisms.

377
00:13:50,985 --> 00:13:53,304
And you were really limited in terms of

378
00:13:53,304 --> 00:13:55,225
what we call the coherence time, I. E.

379
00:13:55,225 --> 00:13:57,544
The the amount of storage time that quantum

380
00:13:57,544 --> 00:13:59,644
information could be held and manipulated,

381
00:14:00,184 --> 00:14:01,964
in that type of approach. But,

382
00:14:02,519 --> 00:14:05,420
actually what came from that was further development,

383
00:14:05,960 --> 00:14:07,580
into what we call the transmon.

384
00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:09,259
Now the transmon,

385
00:14:09,639 --> 00:14:12,360
there's another paper, which maybe that's one as

386
00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:14,460
well, which might be up for a future,

387
00:14:16,575 --> 00:14:17,075
quantum,

388
00:14:17,695 --> 00:14:18,175
future,

389
00:14:18,495 --> 00:14:21,215
Nobel prize, but this was really Deveray and

390
00:14:21,215 --> 00:14:23,055
his wider research group. So then you kind

391
00:14:23,055 --> 00:14:25,375
of move on to Deveray and Sholkov and

392
00:14:25,375 --> 00:14:29,075
Warrath and kind of circuit QED methods,

393
00:14:29,889 --> 00:14:32,070
which are all based off this Transmon

394
00:14:32,450 --> 00:14:34,230
type approach. But fundamentally,

395
00:14:34,610 --> 00:14:35,350
that Transmon

396
00:14:36,289 --> 00:14:37,509
includes, of course,

397
00:14:37,970 --> 00:14:40,210
all or is built upon all of the

398
00:14:40,210 --> 00:14:40,710
understanding,

399
00:14:42,370 --> 00:14:43,985
of of that original

400
00:14:44,764 --> 00:14:46,384
kind of circuit QED piece,

401
00:14:47,725 --> 00:14:48,205
but,

402
00:14:48,605 --> 00:14:50,684
is is engineered in a way that means

403
00:14:50,684 --> 00:14:52,205
that what we can do is start to

404
00:14:52,205 --> 00:14:54,924
optimise all of the different components within it.

405
00:14:55,164 --> 00:14:57,485
For example, you you couple it to a

406
00:14:57,485 --> 00:14:58,544
microwave resonator,

407
00:14:59,699 --> 00:15:01,220
so that you can start to increase their

408
00:15:01,220 --> 00:15:02,980
coherence time. You would cross some charge of

409
00:15:02,980 --> 00:15:04,519
phase. So there's

410
00:15:04,980 --> 00:15:07,139
fair amount of research that's gone on just

411
00:15:07,139 --> 00:15:08,339
to even get to the point of the

412
00:15:08,339 --> 00:15:10,759
transmon, but the transmon then,

413
00:15:11,539 --> 00:15:12,039
underpins,

414
00:15:12,524 --> 00:15:14,865
I would say, pretty much the entire superconducting

415
00:15:15,485 --> 00:15:17,105
quantum circuit space,

416
00:15:17,485 --> 00:15:20,144
today. So any quantum computer, you know, IBM,

417
00:15:20,764 --> 00:15:22,625
of course, Oxford Quantum Circuits,

418
00:15:23,324 --> 00:15:23,824
IQM,

419
00:15:24,125 --> 00:15:24,625
Rigetti,

420
00:15:25,245 --> 00:15:26,144
I think AWS.

421
00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:29,920
They're all based on this core Transmon type

422
00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:30,420
technology,

423
00:15:31,759 --> 00:15:35,379
which is from that core circuit QED toolbox

424
00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:37,540
that was was first demonstrated here.

425
00:15:38,559 --> 00:15:38,960
And,

426
00:15:40,235 --> 00:15:43,375
can we get on to, Oxford Quantum Circuits,

427
00:15:43,914 --> 00:15:44,894
Alana? You,

428
00:15:45,195 --> 00:15:45,695
cofounded

429
00:15:46,394 --> 00:15:49,934
that UK based company in 2017,

430
00:15:50,394 --> 00:15:51,855
and, it uses

431
00:15:52,259 --> 00:15:52,759
superconducting,

432
00:15:54,019 --> 00:15:56,019
circuits. Can you can you talk a bit

433
00:15:56,019 --> 00:15:57,480
about the challenges

434
00:15:57,860 --> 00:15:58,600
of taking

435
00:15:58,980 --> 00:15:59,480
superconducting

436
00:15:59,940 --> 00:16:01,399
circuits out of the lab,

437
00:16:02,019 --> 00:16:03,399
back in 2017

438
00:16:03,460 --> 00:16:03,960
and

439
00:16:04,355 --> 00:16:04,855
creating,

440
00:16:05,475 --> 00:16:05,975
practical

441
00:16:06,514 --> 00:16:08,214
commercial systems. Was it,

442
00:16:08,595 --> 00:16:10,454
I'm guessing there were a lot of challenges

443
00:16:10,514 --> 00:16:11,894
involved in that commercialization.

444
00:16:12,995 --> 00:16:14,834
Yeah. Of course. And and for anybody in

445
00:16:14,834 --> 00:16:16,409
the space, there there still are.

446
00:16:17,370 --> 00:16:20,490
So I joined OQC, Oxford Quantum Circuits as

447
00:16:20,490 --> 00:16:23,690
founding CEO alongside Doctor. Peter Leek, from the

448
00:16:23,690 --> 00:16:25,069
Oxford physics department.

449
00:16:25,850 --> 00:16:27,929
I think this is a really great example,

450
00:16:27,929 --> 00:16:30,565
right, of where you can have a core

451
00:16:30,565 --> 00:16:32,644
technology, a core piece of IP or an

452
00:16:32,644 --> 00:16:34,184
idea that sits within academia.

453
00:16:35,044 --> 00:16:36,485
But there's a really long way to go

454
00:16:36,485 --> 00:16:38,245
and to be able to turn, you know,

455
00:16:38,245 --> 00:16:41,445
an idea or a concept or, an early

456
00:16:41,445 --> 00:16:42,004
kind of,

457
00:16:43,570 --> 00:16:45,589
piece of science through into,

458
00:16:47,009 --> 00:16:49,169
a commercial system. Right? That's a long path

459
00:16:49,169 --> 00:16:50,149
and a long journey.

460
00:16:50,929 --> 00:16:53,009
If we specifically start just looking at the

461
00:16:53,009 --> 00:16:55,970
actual qubits themselves, like the approach we were

462
00:16:55,970 --> 00:16:58,355
able to take there was how can we

463
00:16:58,355 --> 00:17:00,674
kind of utilize that deep relationship with the

464
00:17:00,674 --> 00:17:01,174
university

465
00:17:01,955 --> 00:17:04,275
whilst it's the technology is still a kind

466
00:17:04,275 --> 00:17:05,335
of early technology

467
00:17:05,714 --> 00:17:06,214
readiness

468
00:17:06,835 --> 00:17:08,674
to both prove out the physics and build

469
00:17:08,674 --> 00:17:09,960
confidence in the physics.

470
00:17:10,519 --> 00:17:11,799
And then what I was able to do

471
00:17:11,799 --> 00:17:13,559
is the CEO is come in and go,

472
00:17:13,559 --> 00:17:15,880
right. Okay. How do we now turn this

473
00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:18,279
into an actual system? How do we de

474
00:17:18,279 --> 00:17:21,099
risk technology in university and build a stack?

475
00:17:21,399 --> 00:17:23,720
And that's a lot more than just kind

476
00:17:23,720 --> 00:17:25,659
of proving out a key bit. Right? That's

477
00:17:25,994 --> 00:17:26,494
optimising,

478
00:17:27,434 --> 00:17:27,934
reproducibly

479
00:17:28,555 --> 00:17:29,375
at scale,

480
00:17:29,755 --> 00:17:31,855
but also building the rest of a computing

481
00:17:32,075 --> 00:17:36,335
stack, which requires significant kind of multi interdisciplinary

482
00:17:37,515 --> 00:17:38,974
teams pulling from

483
00:17:39,569 --> 00:17:40,069
industry,

484
00:17:41,250 --> 00:17:42,390
across the world.

485
00:17:43,169 --> 00:17:43,669
And

486
00:17:44,049 --> 00:17:46,609
of course you have the qubit itself with

487
00:17:46,609 --> 00:17:47,429
these individual,

488
00:17:48,609 --> 00:17:51,509
transmons for oxo quantum circuits. That's the coaximon,

489
00:17:51,730 --> 00:17:54,305
which was the invention from Peter Leake in

490
00:17:54,305 --> 00:17:55,684
in the physics department.

491
00:17:56,305 --> 00:17:57,985
But, of course, you then also need to

492
00:17:57,985 --> 00:17:59,265
build the rest of the stacks or the

493
00:17:59,265 --> 00:18:01,985
control hardware, the control software. And one of

494
00:18:01,985 --> 00:18:04,225
the things that I was really passionate about

495
00:18:04,225 --> 00:18:06,144
is, like, making sure that we were putting

496
00:18:06,144 --> 00:18:09,289
the customer, right, the commercial mindset at

497
00:18:09,750 --> 00:18:11,509
the forefront of everything we were doing. I

498
00:18:11,509 --> 00:18:12,970
don't think it's worth or

499
00:18:13,509 --> 00:18:16,409
correct to build technology in isolation. So

500
00:18:16,869 --> 00:18:17,509
for us,

501
00:18:17,990 --> 00:18:19,750
one of the first key milestones we did

502
00:18:19,750 --> 00:18:21,589
was prove out a kind of end to

503
00:18:21,589 --> 00:18:22,605
end vertical slice

504
00:18:23,085 --> 00:18:24,924
with the first system, which was only four

505
00:18:24,924 --> 00:18:25,424
cubits.

506
00:18:26,125 --> 00:18:27,724
But we connected up to,

507
00:18:28,125 --> 00:18:29,964
a consumer, a customer that was running an

508
00:18:29,964 --> 00:18:30,464
algorithm.

509
00:18:31,085 --> 00:18:33,005
And at each point, we've always tried to

510
00:18:33,005 --> 00:18:35,325
keep the customer at the forefront of everything

511
00:18:35,325 --> 00:18:37,565
we were doing, and that meant providing them

512
00:18:37,565 --> 00:18:38,065
access.

513
00:18:38,389 --> 00:18:39,990
You know? And when you do that, you

514
00:18:39,990 --> 00:18:40,490
get,

515
00:18:41,750 --> 00:18:43,669
you get a deeper understanding, of course, of

516
00:18:43,669 --> 00:18:44,169
the

517
00:18:44,470 --> 00:18:47,029
the challenges, both from a technical but also

518
00:18:47,029 --> 00:18:47,529
from

519
00:18:47,829 --> 00:18:48,889
a systems integration

520
00:18:49,669 --> 00:18:50,169
perspective,

521
00:18:50,789 --> 00:18:52,089
for the for the consumer.

522
00:18:52,634 --> 00:18:54,154
And at the end of the day, the

523
00:18:54,154 --> 00:18:55,134
the kind of really,

524
00:18:55,914 --> 00:18:56,654
I guess,

525
00:18:57,595 --> 00:19:00,634
challenging thing for the quantum physicist think about

526
00:19:00,634 --> 00:19:03,595
is that ultimately the consumer doesn't care whether

527
00:19:03,595 --> 00:19:04,335
it's quantum

528
00:19:04,650 --> 00:19:06,090
or not. Like, we want to be able

529
00:19:06,090 --> 00:19:07,609
to solve their problems. So you need to

530
00:19:07,609 --> 00:19:08,730
be able to find a way to zoom

531
00:19:08,730 --> 00:19:09,230
out,

532
00:19:10,250 --> 00:19:12,490
as as well and really focus on the

533
00:19:12,490 --> 00:19:14,029
type of problems that they have,

534
00:19:14,410 --> 00:19:16,509
and really think about, you know, security.

535
00:19:16,894 --> 00:19:19,154
How does this integrate into their existing workflow?

536
00:19:19,615 --> 00:19:21,214
But at the same time, you've also got

537
00:19:21,214 --> 00:19:23,855
to build from the bottom up. And, you

538
00:19:23,855 --> 00:19:26,434
know, this is true for all quantum companies

539
00:19:26,494 --> 00:19:29,054
out there today is that the systems that

540
00:19:29,054 --> 00:19:29,954
that we have

541
00:19:30,509 --> 00:19:32,430
and the, the progress that we're making with

542
00:19:32,430 --> 00:19:35,150
the, the actual, I'd say performance of the,

543
00:19:35,150 --> 00:19:37,710
the quantum bits, be it through superconducting circuits

544
00:19:37,710 --> 00:19:39,970
or NV centers or silicon or ion traps.

545
00:19:40,590 --> 00:19:42,990
No, it's, it's really improving rapidly, but we

546
00:19:42,990 --> 00:19:44,349
need to be able to do this at

547
00:19:44,349 --> 00:19:45,970
tens of thousands, if not millions

548
00:19:46,325 --> 00:19:46,984
of cubits

549
00:19:47,765 --> 00:19:48,265
reproducibly

550
00:19:48,644 --> 00:19:51,224
with high quality, with super low latency,

551
00:19:52,565 --> 00:19:54,345
in a manner that is seamless,

552
00:19:54,964 --> 00:19:57,224
and kind of integrated into

553
00:19:57,605 --> 00:20:00,184
the existing industry. And that's really challenging.

554
00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:03,319
I think it's worth touching on, if you

555
00:20:03,319 --> 00:20:06,220
don't mind, like, the superconducting circuits in particular

556
00:20:06,279 --> 00:20:07,099
here, because

557
00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:10,200
where you have Josephson junctions and this kind

558
00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:11,880
of core piece, still one of the biggest

559
00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:14,440
challenges is that that's the core component that's

560
00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:15,339
really challenging

561
00:20:16,724 --> 00:20:18,505
to reproduce at scale,

562
00:20:19,045 --> 00:20:20,505
with with high yield.

563
00:20:21,285 --> 00:20:22,825
And it's not something that

564
00:20:23,444 --> 00:20:25,384
exists in the existing semiconductor

565
00:20:26,164 --> 00:20:26,984
supply chain,

566
00:20:27,845 --> 00:20:30,005
as a kind of methodology. So that is

567
00:20:30,005 --> 00:20:31,144
one of the biggest challenges,

568
00:20:32,490 --> 00:20:33,869
for any of the superconducting

569
00:20:34,410 --> 00:20:35,710
circuit players today.

570
00:20:36,570 --> 00:20:40,009
And you you mentioned, that superconducting circuits, they're

571
00:20:40,009 --> 00:20:41,850
they're not the only game in town when

572
00:20:41,850 --> 00:20:44,970
it comes to creating qubits and and and

573
00:20:44,970 --> 00:20:46,029
quantum processors.

574
00:20:47,345 --> 00:20:47,744
Are we

575
00:20:48,545 --> 00:20:50,404
do we are we still in the mindset

576
00:20:50,464 --> 00:20:52,164
that there is going to be one

577
00:20:52,704 --> 00:20:55,525
type of qubit technology, be it superconducting

578
00:20:55,904 --> 00:20:58,785
or something else, that's going to win out?

579
00:20:58,785 --> 00:20:59,279
Or

580
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:02,720
could we see a future with with a

581
00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:04,900
number of different types of qubits

582
00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:08,000
integrated together? So, you know, you might have

583
00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:08,500
superconducting

584
00:21:09,039 --> 00:21:10,259
qubits, you might have

585
00:21:10,559 --> 00:21:14,500
optical NV qubits and trapped ions all

586
00:21:14,815 --> 00:21:17,955
in one system or connected on a quantum

587
00:21:18,255 --> 00:21:18,755
internet.

588
00:21:19,695 --> 00:21:20,195
What's

589
00:21:20,815 --> 00:21:21,535
the view,

590
00:21:22,174 --> 00:21:24,035
in the industry today about

591
00:21:24,335 --> 00:21:26,355
the, you know, the race for the ultimate

592
00:21:26,414 --> 00:21:26,914
qubit?

593
00:21:28,009 --> 00:21:28,649
Well, I think,

594
00:21:29,289 --> 00:21:31,210
maybe my view is different from the view

595
00:21:31,210 --> 00:21:32,970
across, across the industry today. So if you

596
00:21:32,970 --> 00:21:34,490
go and speak to any of these individual

597
00:21:34,490 --> 00:21:36,750
companies, of course, they'll tell you rightly so,

598
00:21:37,289 --> 00:21:40,429
why their single technology will, will, will win.

599
00:21:41,384 --> 00:21:42,984
But for me, I mean, I did my

600
00:21:42,984 --> 00:21:45,785
PhD originally in hybrid quantum systems. So I

601
00:21:45,785 --> 00:21:48,605
was doing superconducting circuits coupled with,

602
00:21:49,865 --> 00:21:50,845
spin ensembles,

603
00:21:51,545 --> 00:21:54,445
and got to work with, different spin mechanisms

604
00:21:54,585 --> 00:21:55,244
as well.

605
00:21:55,829 --> 00:21:56,329
And

606
00:21:56,950 --> 00:21:58,569
if you look at the progression

607
00:21:58,950 --> 00:22:00,890
of, say, classical compute,

608
00:22:01,509 --> 00:22:03,049
I honestly think it would be

609
00:22:03,589 --> 00:22:07,130
naive to think that any one single technology,

610
00:22:08,244 --> 00:22:09,544
or kind of underlying,

611
00:22:10,804 --> 00:22:12,585
quantum basis is going to be

612
00:22:12,884 --> 00:22:14,424
utilised for absolutely everything.

613
00:22:15,365 --> 00:22:16,884
So I don't think there's a winner take

614
00:22:16,884 --> 00:22:19,845
all, technology. I do think it's worth still

615
00:22:19,845 --> 00:22:22,345
investing in multiple different technologies.

616
00:22:23,720 --> 00:22:25,320
And I do see a world in which

617
00:22:25,320 --> 00:22:26,220
we've got

618
00:22:26,600 --> 00:22:28,700
different underlying types of qubits,

619
00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:31,580
optimised for different applications,

620
00:22:32,279 --> 00:22:34,600
and that they probably will be hybrid quantum

621
00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:35,820
computers or networks

622
00:22:36,664 --> 00:22:37,884
in in some form,

623
00:22:38,664 --> 00:22:40,904
in in the future. So I'm a firm

624
00:22:40,904 --> 00:22:43,384
believer in in hybrid quantum systems to that

625
00:22:43,384 --> 00:22:43,884
moment.

626
00:22:45,065 --> 00:22:46,904
And I think today you've got,

627
00:22:47,464 --> 00:22:49,865
you've got a fairly good overview, don't you,

628
00:22:49,865 --> 00:22:50,365
of

629
00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:53,140
of of of the quantum industry

630
00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:57,519
and, you know, who who's investing what, and,

631
00:22:57,519 --> 00:23:00,580
you know, what technologies are are hot, and

632
00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:02,980
and maybe what technologies are fading.

633
00:23:03,279 --> 00:23:06,099
How would you characterize the industry today?

634
00:23:06,585 --> 00:23:07,244
Is it,

635
00:23:07,784 --> 00:23:09,944
has it has it matured quite a bit

636
00:23:09,944 --> 00:23:11,565
from, say, 2017

637
00:23:11,784 --> 00:23:14,765
when you when you first kicked off with,

638
00:23:15,065 --> 00:23:18,105
Oxford Quantum Circuits? You know, how how has

639
00:23:18,105 --> 00:23:19,224
it changed, and,

640
00:23:19,784 --> 00:23:22,639
and where where is it heading? Yeah. For

641
00:23:22,639 --> 00:23:24,579
sure. I mean, look, when I was

642
00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:25,460
first

643
00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:26,500
fundraising

644
00:23:27,039 --> 00:23:29,599
and building the first quantum computers over at

645
00:23:29,599 --> 00:23:31,839
OQC, like, honestly, I should have run a

646
00:23:31,839 --> 00:23:33,220
consultancy just educating,

647
00:23:33,919 --> 00:23:35,139
consumers, investors.

648
00:23:36,245 --> 00:23:37,845
I probably would have made more money and

649
00:23:37,845 --> 00:23:38,585
more progress,

650
00:23:39,605 --> 00:23:41,684
because it was a really, really nascent space.

651
00:23:41,684 --> 00:23:43,365
Right. Consumers didn't know,

652
00:23:44,164 --> 00:23:46,245
what what the technology could could do yet.

653
00:23:46,245 --> 00:23:48,184
So there's a lot of education there.

654
00:23:49,259 --> 00:23:52,320
The investors were really still developing their thesis

655
00:23:52,380 --> 00:23:55,100
on where they would invest and understanding the

656
00:23:55,100 --> 00:23:55,600
fundamentals,

657
00:23:56,860 --> 00:23:58,320
of, of what it would take.

658
00:23:58,940 --> 00:24:00,160
Fast forward to

659
00:24:00,474 --> 00:24:00,974
today,

660
00:24:01,674 --> 00:24:02,894
that has significantly

661
00:24:03,434 --> 00:24:03,934
shifted,

662
00:24:04,315 --> 00:24:06,974
as a landscape, both from a consumer perspective

663
00:24:07,194 --> 00:24:11,595
where the early adopters, particularly across finance, across,

664
00:24:11,994 --> 00:24:13,674
materials discovery, across,

665
00:24:14,075 --> 00:24:14,575
simulation,

666
00:24:16,019 --> 00:24:17,880
of underlying kind of molecular

667
00:24:18,259 --> 00:24:18,759
dynamics,

668
00:24:19,380 --> 00:24:22,019
and and so much more across both and

669
00:24:22,019 --> 00:24:24,740
I broaden this now to to computing, sensing,

670
00:24:24,740 --> 00:24:25,480
and communications.

671
00:24:26,740 --> 00:24:29,220
The industry has has matured rapidly. Now there's

672
00:24:29,220 --> 00:24:29,684
still

673
00:24:30,245 --> 00:24:31,924
a long way to go, of course. We

674
00:24:31,924 --> 00:24:33,765
still need to make sure that we are

675
00:24:33,765 --> 00:24:34,265
building

676
00:24:34,725 --> 00:24:37,365
quantum computers that will eventually be fault tolerant

677
00:24:37,365 --> 00:24:38,985
in capability. We are still

678
00:24:39,525 --> 00:24:40,745
on the cusp of,

679
00:24:41,525 --> 00:24:43,529
kind of coming out of the the NISC,

680
00:24:43,930 --> 00:24:46,349
noisy intermediary scale quantum era

681
00:24:46,809 --> 00:24:47,309
where,

682
00:24:47,849 --> 00:24:49,450
we are pushing the boundaries of what can

683
00:24:49,450 --> 00:24:50,109
be simulated.

684
00:24:50,570 --> 00:24:52,809
But most importantly, I think you've got really

685
00:24:52,809 --> 00:24:53,710
smart end users,

686
00:24:54,650 --> 00:24:56,349
and you've also got really

687
00:24:56,650 --> 00:24:57,150
rapid

688
00:24:57,514 --> 00:24:58,654
technological development

689
00:24:59,434 --> 00:25:01,134
across lots of different underlying

690
00:25:01,674 --> 00:25:03,534
quantum technologies proving

691
00:25:04,315 --> 00:25:06,815
that we are seeing significant,

692
00:25:07,835 --> 00:25:08,335
traction,

693
00:25:10,075 --> 00:25:12,419
which which gives us confidence that we will

694
00:25:12,419 --> 00:25:12,919
meet,

695
00:25:13,299 --> 00:25:16,099
and eventually surpass kind of that quantum advantage

696
00:25:16,099 --> 00:25:18,179
point likely in the next year. If I'm

697
00:25:18,980 --> 00:25:21,539
maybe maybe that's my prediction. We'll see whether

698
00:25:21,539 --> 00:25:22,200
we're true,

699
00:25:22,659 --> 00:25:24,419
true next year or not. But I'd say,

700
00:25:24,419 --> 00:25:26,919
you know, characterizing overall, we've gone from

701
00:25:27,295 --> 00:25:28,835
we've gone from early demos,

702
00:25:30,494 --> 00:25:31,795
to a lot more maturity.

703
00:25:32,575 --> 00:25:34,575
We've got full systems. We've got a really

704
00:25:34,575 --> 00:25:35,075
competitive

705
00:25:35,934 --> 00:25:36,434
ecosystem.

706
00:25:37,134 --> 00:25:39,615
We've got a maturing market, and we've got

707
00:25:39,615 --> 00:25:40,515
a much more

708
00:25:41,400 --> 00:25:42,440
smart, ready, capable,

709
00:25:44,039 --> 00:25:44,539
investor,

710
00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:47,000
market as well. I think even the amount

711
00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:49,000
of investment that's gone in the last '24

712
00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:52,299
to '20 last year, like, 2024 to 2025,

713
00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:54,255
I think it's, like, doubled.

714
00:25:54,654 --> 00:25:56,734
So we're seeing a lot of money, a

715
00:25:56,734 --> 00:25:57,555
lot of talent,

716
00:25:57,934 --> 00:25:59,154
and a lot of expertise,

717
00:25:59,855 --> 00:26:02,194
in the space, which is is really, truly,

718
00:26:02,654 --> 00:26:03,154
exciting.

719
00:26:04,174 --> 00:26:05,555
And what's your role,

720
00:26:05,934 --> 00:26:07,295
Elana? What are you up to at the

721
00:26:07,295 --> 00:26:09,350
moment? Are you are you are you on

722
00:26:09,350 --> 00:26:10,950
the business side of things, or are you

723
00:26:10,950 --> 00:26:11,450
back

724
00:26:11,830 --> 00:26:13,269
in in the lab, or is it a

725
00:26:13,269 --> 00:26:15,109
bit of both for you? That is a

726
00:26:15,109 --> 00:26:17,269
a great question. Thankfully for everybody, I'm not

727
00:26:17,269 --> 00:26:18,090
in a laboratory

728
00:26:19,029 --> 00:26:19,529
because

729
00:26:20,549 --> 00:26:23,025
as much as I absolutely loved being an

730
00:26:23,025 --> 00:26:23,525
experimentalist,

731
00:26:24,144 --> 00:26:26,085
I was definitely much better as a CEO

732
00:26:26,345 --> 00:26:26,845
than,

733
00:26:28,545 --> 00:26:31,125
doing the actual kind of, fabrication,

734
00:26:32,305 --> 00:26:34,465
my myself. So we will we all play

735
00:26:34,465 --> 00:26:35,285
into our strengths.

736
00:26:35,789 --> 00:26:37,490
But, yeah, right now I'm actually exploring

737
00:26:37,870 --> 00:26:40,110
a few stealth projects. Of course, it's where

738
00:26:40,110 --> 00:26:42,930
deep tech and quantum primarily meets leadership.

739
00:26:44,029 --> 00:26:46,190
So there's a number of teams in quantum

740
00:26:46,190 --> 00:26:47,410
across different technologies,

741
00:26:48,404 --> 00:26:50,164
where I'm able to help them in their

742
00:26:50,164 --> 00:26:52,424
earlier stages. There's still plenty of room,

743
00:26:53,205 --> 00:26:54,424
in in the market,

744
00:26:54,965 --> 00:26:57,285
to set up with their vision, their mission,

745
00:26:57,285 --> 00:26:58,025
their values.

746
00:26:58,884 --> 00:27:01,809
And I'm really enjoying kind of helping support

747
00:27:01,950 --> 00:27:02,690
the ecosystem

748
00:27:02,990 --> 00:27:05,309
to up and grow in that way, both

749
00:27:05,549 --> 00:27:07,009
I mean, I'm an entrepreneur.

750
00:27:07,630 --> 00:27:08,529
I am founding,

751
00:27:09,150 --> 00:27:09,970
for sure.

752
00:27:11,069 --> 00:27:13,009
But also I'm I'm really enjoying

753
00:27:13,390 --> 00:27:16,450
advising early stage teams and getting to know,

754
00:27:17,684 --> 00:27:20,505
yeah, different different teams, different setups from

755
00:27:20,884 --> 00:27:22,585
around around the world.

756
00:27:23,525 --> 00:27:25,525
And if I can kinda give a little

757
00:27:25,525 --> 00:27:26,505
a little teaser,

758
00:27:27,845 --> 00:27:28,964
I know if you know,

759
00:27:29,444 --> 00:27:29,944
Rumi's

760
00:27:30,325 --> 00:27:32,450
quote. It's is like out beyond the ideas

761
00:27:32,450 --> 00:27:34,610
of wrongdoing and right doing. There is a

762
00:27:34,610 --> 00:27:35,110
field

763
00:27:35,570 --> 00:27:36,710
and I'll be there.

764
00:27:39,730 --> 00:27:40,470
And finally,

765
00:27:41,009 --> 00:27:43,170
Elana, I'd like to sort of co opt

766
00:27:43,170 --> 00:27:46,005
you in our sort of ongoing project of

767
00:27:46,005 --> 00:27:47,944
trying to predict the next,

768
00:27:48,565 --> 00:27:51,284
Nobel Prize for Physics, something that here on

769
00:27:51,284 --> 00:27:54,244
Physics World, we well, we're we're luck we

770
00:27:54,244 --> 00:27:56,085
we luck out occasionally, I think. We get

771
00:27:56,085 --> 00:27:58,804
it right occasionally, but normally we get it

772
00:27:58,804 --> 00:27:59,304
wrong.

773
00:28:00,690 --> 00:28:03,190
Is there any research that's being done today

774
00:28:03,329 --> 00:28:04,630
in quantum physics

775
00:28:05,009 --> 00:28:08,049
that you find really exciting and you think

776
00:28:08,049 --> 00:28:10,150
could merit a future

777
00:28:10,529 --> 00:28:11,505
Nobel Prize?

778
00:28:11,825 --> 00:28:14,565
So get that quantum crystal ball out.

779
00:28:16,144 --> 00:28:18,305
Yeah. I mean, look, there's so much exciting

780
00:28:18,305 --> 00:28:18,785
work,

781
00:28:19,424 --> 00:28:19,924
happening.

782
00:28:20,384 --> 00:28:21,204
I think realistically,

783
00:28:22,384 --> 00:28:25,285
anybody who makes a reliable error corrected

784
00:28:26,190 --> 00:28:28,589
quantum computer, like the first to that, like,

785
00:28:28,589 --> 00:28:31,470
absolutely deserves absolutely deserves one because that would

786
00:28:31,470 --> 00:28:32,529
be undeniable

787
00:28:33,470 --> 00:28:33,970
value.

788
00:28:34,829 --> 00:28:36,109
I think what you said at the beginning

789
00:28:36,109 --> 00:28:39,149
about algorithms is also really important, particularly where

790
00:28:39,149 --> 00:28:41,009
you're looking at new and novel,

791
00:28:42,144 --> 00:28:44,244
error correction, error detection type schemes.

792
00:28:44,945 --> 00:28:47,184
There's a huge amount of innovation there. And

793
00:28:47,184 --> 00:28:50,224
what's kind of interesting actually is the almost

794
00:28:50,224 --> 00:28:52,164
quantum inspired impact on classical,

795
00:28:53,505 --> 00:28:56,029
improvements to algorithm development there as well. But

796
00:28:56,029 --> 00:28:57,649
for me, I mean, it's all about impact.

797
00:28:57,710 --> 00:28:59,789
So if I would love to see a

798
00:28:59,789 --> 00:29:01,710
Nobel Prize then go across to, like, if

799
00:29:01,710 --> 00:29:03,089
somebody has been able to

800
00:29:03,630 --> 00:29:04,130
make

801
00:29:04,589 --> 00:29:05,409
a a discovery,

802
00:29:06,429 --> 00:29:06,929
which

803
00:29:07,710 --> 00:29:09,470
I think for me particularly, it was like

804
00:29:09,470 --> 00:29:10,690
purpose built molecular

805
00:29:11,234 --> 00:29:12,134
qubit type,

806
00:29:14,595 --> 00:29:16,775
sorry, molecular simulation type

807
00:29:17,234 --> 00:29:19,335
manners, then I think that that would,

808
00:29:20,595 --> 00:29:21,575
100%

809
00:29:22,035 --> 00:29:22,535
deserve

810
00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:26,240
a kind of Nobel prize. So quantum enabled

811
00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:27,380
discovery in the real

812
00:29:27,759 --> 00:29:30,160
world. Sorry. It's not more more specific than

813
00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:32,240
than that. No. That's that. I mean, that

814
00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:34,640
goes back to, you know, recently we've been

815
00:29:34,640 --> 00:29:37,005
talking about the purpose of the Nobel Prize

816
00:29:37,005 --> 00:29:38,924
here. Yeah. And we've looked at some sort

817
00:29:38,924 --> 00:29:41,404
of crazy prizes from the past that, you

818
00:29:41,404 --> 00:29:43,644
know, to to modernize. You think, you know,

819
00:29:43,644 --> 00:29:45,424
what are they on about? A prize for

820
00:29:45,565 --> 00:29:46,465
color photography.

821
00:29:47,244 --> 00:29:48,845
But, you know, it does say I think

822
00:29:48,845 --> 00:29:51,105
it does explicitly say invention,

823
00:29:52,450 --> 00:29:54,609
when it comes to Nobel Prize. And yeah,

824
00:29:54,609 --> 00:29:56,130
that that I mean that is an an

825
00:29:56,130 --> 00:29:59,169
interesting idea that, you know, when when, you

826
00:29:59,169 --> 00:30:00,710
know, when somebody invents

827
00:30:01,329 --> 00:30:02,149
an extraordinarily

828
00:30:02,849 --> 00:30:03,349
reliable

829
00:30:04,105 --> 00:30:06,845
quantum computer that, you know, achieves amazing

830
00:30:07,384 --> 00:30:07,884
advantage,

831
00:30:08,265 --> 00:30:09,565
that's, you know,

832
00:30:10,105 --> 00:30:10,924
that would definitely

833
00:30:11,464 --> 00:30:12,444
deserve a prize.

834
00:30:13,464 --> 00:30:14,765
Yeah. Prize to the whole industry.

835
00:30:16,345 --> 00:30:18,505
Well, that's the problem, isn't it? You know,

836
00:30:18,505 --> 00:30:18,825
it's,

837
00:30:19,500 --> 00:30:21,420
I mean, particularly if if that sort of

838
00:30:21,420 --> 00:30:22,240
thing is

839
00:30:22,700 --> 00:30:23,680
is developed

840
00:30:24,059 --> 00:30:26,940
at a big company. Mhmm. I mean, if

841
00:30:26,940 --> 00:30:29,279
it's developed at a small company like Oxford

842
00:30:29,579 --> 00:30:32,565
Quantum Circus, maybe, you know, maybe the Nobel

843
00:30:32,565 --> 00:30:35,304
committee would committee would be able to identify

844
00:30:35,444 --> 00:30:36,184
three people.

845
00:30:36,565 --> 00:30:36,884
But,

846
00:30:37,444 --> 00:30:39,125
I'm sure she would be super happy with

847
00:30:39,125 --> 00:30:40,265
that. Peter and Brad.

848
00:30:41,765 --> 00:30:43,224
That's where I put my money.

849
00:30:43,845 --> 00:30:45,444
Okay. Well, that's yeah. Well well well well

850
00:30:45,444 --> 00:30:46,804
well, we'll put them on our list,

851
00:30:47,450 --> 00:30:49,609
for next year. For sure. They have actually,

852
00:30:49,849 --> 00:30:51,849
had some really good results last year with

853
00:30:51,849 --> 00:30:53,930
a a new type of the Echoaxpond device,

854
00:30:54,170 --> 00:30:55,069
as well called

855
00:30:55,369 --> 00:30:56,809
well, I I'm not gonna talk to it,

856
00:30:56,809 --> 00:30:58,650
but but some people should should also look

857
00:30:58,650 --> 00:30:59,230
it up.

858
00:30:59,529 --> 00:31:02,009
Oh, that's great. Well, thanks thanks, Alana. Thanks

859
00:31:02,009 --> 00:31:05,044
so much for, for coming on, the podcast

860
00:31:05,265 --> 00:31:07,664
and, sort of giving us a flavor, you

861
00:31:07,664 --> 00:31:09,044
know, both about the physics,

862
00:31:09,424 --> 00:31:10,325
but also,

863
00:31:10,865 --> 00:31:12,484
you know, how that research has

864
00:31:12,785 --> 00:31:13,904
essentially spawned,

865
00:31:14,865 --> 00:31:16,484
an exciting new industry.

866
00:31:16,890 --> 00:31:18,650
Thanks for coming on. Thank you so much.

867
00:31:18,650 --> 00:31:19,710
Thank you for the time.

868
00:31:27,130 --> 00:31:30,509
That was Ilana Whisby, who's a quantum physicist,

869
00:31:30,970 --> 00:31:32,285
deep tech entrepreneur,

870
00:31:32,744 --> 00:31:34,365
and former CEO

871
00:31:34,744 --> 00:31:36,845
of Oxford Quantum Circuits.

872
00:31:37,305 --> 00:31:39,325
There's much more about this year's

873
00:31:39,705 --> 00:31:41,244
Nobel Prize for Physics

874
00:31:41,545 --> 00:31:43,244
on the Physics World website.

875
00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:46,200
I'm afraid that's all the time we have

876
00:31:46,200 --> 00:31:47,500
for this week's podcast.

877
00:31:47,799 --> 00:31:48,779
I'd like to thank

878
00:31:49,080 --> 00:31:52,059
American Elements for their generous support

879
00:31:52,360 --> 00:31:53,259
of this episode.

880
00:31:54,039 --> 00:31:57,720
Also, thanks to Ilana Whisby for joining me

881
00:31:57,720 --> 00:31:58,220
today.

882
00:31:58,664 --> 00:32:01,164
And as always, thank you to our producer,

883
00:32:01,625 --> 00:32:02,605
Fred Isles.

884
00:32:03,305 --> 00:32:05,625
We'll be back again next week when we

885
00:32:05,625 --> 00:32:07,005
chat about the effect

886
00:32:07,625 --> 00:32:08,205
of microgravity

887
00:32:08,904 --> 00:32:10,765
on the eyes of astronauts

888
00:32:11,305 --> 00:32:13,565
and how they can protect their vision

889
00:32:13,930 --> 00:32:14,750
in space.

890
00:32:15,130 --> 00:32:16,109
See you then.

891
00:32:18,490 --> 00:32:19,549
American Elements,

892
00:32:20,250 --> 00:32:23,789
the world's manufacturer of engineered and advanced materials.

893
00:32:25,690 --> 00:32:26,565
American Elements,

894
00:32:27,684 --> 00:32:28,504
now invent.

Chapters

No chapters available.