Building a quantum future using topological phases of matter and error correction
This episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast features Tim Hsieh of Canada’s Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. We explore some of today’s hottest topics in quantum science and technology – including topological phases of matter; quantum error correction and quantum simulation.
Our conversation begins with an exploration of the quirky properties quantum matter and how these can be exploited to create quantum technologies. We look at the challenges that must be overcome to create large-scale quantum computers; and Hsieh reveals which problem he would solve first if he had access to a powerful quantum processor.
This interview was recorded earlier this autumn when I had the pleasure of visiting the Perimeter Institute and speaking to four physicists about their research. This is the third of those conversations to appear on the podcast.
The first interview in this series from the Perimeter Institute was with Javier Toledo-Marín, “Quantum computing and AI join forces for particle physics”; and the second was with Bianca Dittrich, “Quantum gravity: we explore spin foams and other potential solutions to this enduring challenge“.
This episode is supported by the APS Global Physics Summit, which takes place on 15–20 March, 2026, in Denver, Colorado, and online.
Available Results
Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.
Extract Knowledge
Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.
Transcript
1 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,119 Hello, and welcome to the Physics World Weekly 2 00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:13,059 podcast. I'm Hamish Johnston. 3 00:00:13,724 --> 00:00:16,625 This week, I'm in conversation with Tim Shea 4 00:00:16,844 --> 00:00:18,785 of Canada's Perimeter Institute 5 00:00:19,164 --> 00:00:20,704 for Theoretical Physics. 6 00:00:21,244 --> 00:00:24,285 We explore some of the hottest topics in 7 00:00:24,285 --> 00:00:25,824 quantum science and technology, 8 00:00:26,605 --> 00:00:27,105 including 9 00:00:27,484 --> 00:00:28,544 emergent phenomena, 10 00:00:29,350 --> 00:00:30,570 quantum error correction, 11 00:00:30,870 --> 00:00:32,250 and quantum simulation. 12 00:00:33,510 --> 00:00:36,409 This episode is supported by the APS 13 00:00:37,030 --> 00:00:38,649 Global Physics Summit, 14 00:00:39,030 --> 00:00:42,967 which takes place on March 15 00:00:42,967 --> 00:00:45,304 2026 16 00:00:45,765 --> 00:00:47,304 in Denver, Colorado 17 00:00:47,844 --> 00:00:48,984 and online. 18 00:00:49,765 --> 00:00:52,664 At the largest physics meeting in the world, 19 00:00:52,885 --> 00:00:54,984 you can join thousands of physicists, 20 00:00:55,630 --> 00:00:59,070 students, and policy leaders for a week of 21 00:00:59,070 --> 00:01:00,609 connection and collaboration. 22 00:01:01,789 --> 00:01:05,390 Immerse yourself in the cutting edge science that's 23 00:01:05,390 --> 00:01:07,409 shaping our shared future, 24 00:01:07,855 --> 00:01:10,915 and be part of the global physics community 25 00:01:11,534 --> 00:01:12,754 driving innovation 26 00:01:13,055 --> 00:01:13,555 forward. 27 00:01:14,254 --> 00:01:19,234 Explore the meeting at summit.aps.org. 28 00:01:20,579 --> 00:01:23,219 Earlier this autumn, I had the pleasure of 29 00:01:23,219 --> 00:01:25,079 visiting the Perimeter Institute 30 00:01:25,620 --> 00:01:27,799 where I interviewed four physicists 31 00:01:28,260 --> 00:01:29,400 about their research. 32 00:01:30,099 --> 00:01:32,359 This is the third of those conversations 33 00:01:32,900 --> 00:01:34,439 to appear on the podcast, 34 00:01:35,094 --> 00:01:36,715 And it's with Tim Hsieh, 35 00:01:37,094 --> 00:01:40,075 whose research focuses on quantum information 36 00:01:40,614 --> 00:01:42,075 and quantum matter. 37 00:01:42,534 --> 00:01:43,674 Here's that conversation. 38 00:01:52,829 --> 00:01:56,450 I'm at the Peruner Institute in Waterloo, Ontario, 39 00:01:56,750 --> 00:01:59,069 and I'm very pleased to be joined by 40 00:01:59,069 --> 00:01:59,969 Tim Shea. 41 00:02:00,349 --> 00:02:02,129 Hi, Tim. Welcome to the podcast. 42 00:02:02,509 --> 00:02:05,069 Thanks a lot, Himesh. Thanks for, being here 43 00:02:05,069 --> 00:02:07,354 visiting with us. So Tim, we're gonna talk 44 00:02:07,354 --> 00:02:09,294 about quantum matter, 45 00:02:09,754 --> 00:02:11,354 and I think we need to we need 46 00:02:11,354 --> 00:02:12,655 a definition here. 47 00:02:13,194 --> 00:02:16,495 I mean, aren't most, if not all material 48 00:02:16,715 --> 00:02:17,215 properties 49 00:02:17,834 --> 00:02:18,334 defined 50 00:02:18,790 --> 00:02:22,069 by quantum mechanics. So what is quantum matter 51 00:02:22,069 --> 00:02:22,969 as opposed to 52 00:02:23,349 --> 00:02:24,889 just matter that's 53 00:02:25,189 --> 00:02:27,750 defined by quantum mechanics? Yeah. That's a that's 54 00:02:27,750 --> 00:02:29,990 a great question. So it it's true that, 55 00:02:29,990 --> 00:02:32,824 you know, everything is dictated by the laws 56 00:02:32,824 --> 00:02:35,064 of quantum mechanics, but it turns out that 57 00:02:35,064 --> 00:02:36,205 in certain materials, 58 00:02:37,544 --> 00:02:38,844 the really counterintuitive 59 00:02:39,384 --> 00:02:40,844 laws of quantum mechanics, 60 00:02:41,864 --> 00:02:44,504 play a much bigger role than in other 61 00:02:44,504 --> 00:02:46,800 materials, which look more classical. 62 00:02:47,259 --> 00:02:48,639 Right? Like, so for example, 63 00:02:50,300 --> 00:02:52,719 you know, given our phones, our our computers, 64 00:02:53,819 --> 00:02:56,620 you know, we have a deep appreciation of, 65 00:02:57,340 --> 00:02:57,840 semiconductor 66 00:02:58,139 --> 00:02:59,840 chips, right, like silicon, 67 00:03:00,699 --> 00:03:01,919 things like that. Right? 68 00:03:02,414 --> 00:03:03,074 And these, 69 00:03:03,694 --> 00:03:05,555 you know, for for these these, 70 00:03:06,254 --> 00:03:07,235 very useful materials, 71 00:03:08,334 --> 00:03:11,854 quantum mechanics already plays some role. Right? Like, 72 00:03:11,854 --> 00:03:14,754 the the the power exclusion principle, for example, 73 00:03:15,250 --> 00:03:15,750 is, 74 00:03:17,009 --> 00:03:19,330 really important. Right? We wouldn't be here if 75 00:03:19,330 --> 00:03:21,169 it wasn't for the Pauli exclusion principle. Yeah. 76 00:03:21,169 --> 00:03:22,469 Yeah. Ex exactly. 77 00:03:23,250 --> 00:03:25,090 And and so, you know, in in coming 78 00:03:25,090 --> 00:03:25,409 up with, 79 00:03:26,209 --> 00:03:28,629 a theory of, band gaps in semiconductors, 80 00:03:28,930 --> 00:03:29,669 for example, 81 00:03:31,305 --> 00:03:33,544 we already need quantum mechanics. But this is 82 00:03:33,544 --> 00:03:36,425 more quantum mechanics at, at a single particle 83 00:03:36,425 --> 00:03:36,925 level. 84 00:03:37,224 --> 00:03:39,064 Right? We're basically dealing with, 85 00:03:39,625 --> 00:03:40,444 you know, how, 86 00:03:40,825 --> 00:03:43,465 a single electron moves in in a whole 87 00:03:43,465 --> 00:03:44,525 crystal array. 88 00:03:44,879 --> 00:03:47,680 And, by analyzing that, we can already, you 89 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:49,060 know, derive a lot of 90 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:52,419 the, useful properties of of semiconductors, for example. 91 00:03:53,199 --> 00:03:55,439 Okay. So that's, like, that's kinda like level 92 00:03:55,439 --> 00:03:56,819 one quantum materials. 93 00:03:57,759 --> 00:03:59,199 But then it turns out that there are 94 00:03:59,199 --> 00:04:00,340 even more exotic, 95 00:04:00,775 --> 00:04:03,594 like, higher level quantum materials where, 96 00:04:04,215 --> 00:04:06,075 quantum mechanics plays a much 97 00:04:06,694 --> 00:04:08,635 deeper and complex role. 98 00:04:09,014 --> 00:04:10,855 So some of which we haven't even completely 99 00:04:10,855 --> 00:04:11,355 understood. 100 00:04:11,895 --> 00:04:13,974 Right? And and that's because, for these, you 101 00:04:13,974 --> 00:04:15,675 know, more exotic quantum materials, 102 00:04:16,620 --> 00:04:18,720 we're not dealing with a a single particle 103 00:04:19,100 --> 00:04:20,699 moving into crystal. We're dealing with, like, a 104 00:04:20,699 --> 00:04:22,479 whole collection of interacting 105 00:04:23,019 --> 00:04:23,519 electrons 106 00:04:24,220 --> 00:04:26,560 or or spins, magnetic moments. 107 00:04:27,019 --> 00:04:27,839 And so now, 108 00:04:28,539 --> 00:04:29,519 you know, we have 109 00:04:29,979 --> 00:04:31,915 a a a many body problem in which 110 00:04:31,915 --> 00:04:33,355 we have to apply the laws of quantum 111 00:04:33,355 --> 00:04:34,334 mechanics are. 112 00:04:34,955 --> 00:04:36,235 We have to apply the laws of quantum 113 00:04:36,235 --> 00:04:36,735 mechanics. 114 00:04:37,115 --> 00:04:38,634 And so that that can give rise to 115 00:04:38,634 --> 00:04:39,435 a lot of new, 116 00:04:40,074 --> 00:04:40,574 emergent 117 00:04:41,115 --> 00:04:43,595 phenomena that we didn't expect at the single 118 00:04:43,595 --> 00:04:44,495 particle level. 119 00:04:44,819 --> 00:04:47,139 Right? And so one one example is, for 120 00:04:47,139 --> 00:04:48,039 example, superconductivity, 121 00:04:48,899 --> 00:04:49,779 right, or, 122 00:04:50,339 --> 00:04:52,519 our what what we call quantum spin liquids. 123 00:04:54,019 --> 00:04:55,620 These are where we really have to deal 124 00:04:55,620 --> 00:04:57,860 with the the whole system, like, you know, 125 00:04:57,860 --> 00:04:59,639 10 to the 23 or more, 126 00:05:00,214 --> 00:05:02,235 electrons degrees of freedom interacting. 127 00:05:02,855 --> 00:05:05,274 Right? So so these, I would say, are, 128 00:05:05,814 --> 00:05:07,355 much of the focus of modern, 129 00:05:08,055 --> 00:05:09,274 quantum matter research. 130 00:05:09,735 --> 00:05:11,915 And I I wanted to ask you about 131 00:05:12,294 --> 00:05:12,794 emergent 132 00:05:13,449 --> 00:05:15,550 phenomena. I think it was it Philip Anderson 133 00:05:15,610 --> 00:05:18,329 who said more is different Right. Right. In 134 00:05:18,329 --> 00:05:19,849 the sense that when you when you have 135 00:05:19,849 --> 00:05:21,470 lots of things interacting 136 00:05:21,930 --> 00:05:24,750 Mhmm. You can have very strange well, 137 00:05:25,754 --> 00:05:27,915 structures pop out of it. Right. Right. And, 138 00:05:27,915 --> 00:05:30,074 you know, I suppose these are it's not 139 00:05:30,074 --> 00:05:31,754 just in the quantum world. You know, if 140 00:05:31,754 --> 00:05:33,514 you go to a beach, for example, you'll 141 00:05:33,514 --> 00:05:35,915 see lovely ripples in the sand. Mhmm. Things 142 00:05:35,915 --> 00:05:37,675 like that. So we're we're sort of used 143 00:05:37,675 --> 00:05:38,175 to, 144 00:05:40,100 --> 00:05:41,639 collections of small things 145 00:05:41,939 --> 00:05:46,019 organizing themselves into big patterns. Right. But how, 146 00:05:47,220 --> 00:05:49,060 how does this work in in the quantum 147 00:05:49,060 --> 00:05:51,139 world? Yeah. Yes. You gave a few examples. 148 00:05:51,139 --> 00:05:53,055 Can you maybe give a a few more? 149 00:05:53,055 --> 00:05:54,975 Sure. Sure. Yeah. So in in indeed, it's 150 00:05:54,975 --> 00:05:57,314 true that even in, you know, macroscopic 151 00:05:57,694 --> 00:06:01,235 classical systems, you know, without any, you know, 152 00:06:01,855 --> 00:06:05,214 quantum mechanics necessary, there's already immersion phenomena, like 153 00:06:05,214 --> 00:06:06,355 like the type you described. 154 00:06:07,220 --> 00:06:09,319 For for large or, you know, macroscopic 155 00:06:10,420 --> 00:06:13,300 quantum systems, you can have even more interesting 156 00:06:13,300 --> 00:06:13,800 phenomena. 157 00:06:14,819 --> 00:06:17,319 One of my favorites is, something called 158 00:06:17,699 --> 00:06:19,160 the topological order. 159 00:06:19,939 --> 00:06:21,060 And that that's when, 160 00:06:21,694 --> 00:06:22,754 you know, you can have 161 00:06:23,134 --> 00:06:25,314 systems of, you know, individual, 162 00:06:26,254 --> 00:06:26,754 bosonic 163 00:06:27,134 --> 00:06:28,595 degrees of freedom. Right? 164 00:06:29,214 --> 00:06:30,754 But whose whose interaction 165 00:06:31,535 --> 00:06:33,535 give rise to some state in which you 166 00:06:33,535 --> 00:06:34,914 have immersion fermion 167 00:06:35,214 --> 00:06:35,714 particles, 168 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,439 coming out. Oh, really? That's that's really interesting. 169 00:06:40,439 --> 00:06:41,420 So the the 170 00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:44,199 how can bosons team up to make a 171 00:06:44,199 --> 00:06:46,540 fermion? Yeah. Yeah. So I could see fermions 172 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:48,520 teaming up to make a boson, but Right. 173 00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:50,444 Right. Right. The opposite seems a bit odd. 174 00:06:50,524 --> 00:06:52,305 It's it's it's pretty amazing. Like, 175 00:06:53,004 --> 00:06:54,404 one way to think of this is that, 176 00:06:54,404 --> 00:06:56,845 you know, you can you can imagine the 177 00:06:56,845 --> 00:06:57,345 individual 178 00:06:58,205 --> 00:06:59,585 constituents of the system 179 00:07:00,125 --> 00:07:02,925 as being composed of even smaller degrees of 180 00:07:02,925 --> 00:07:03,425 freedom. 181 00:07:03,730 --> 00:07:06,050 Right? So so in in in, you know, 182 00:07:06,050 --> 00:07:08,930 fundamental particle physics, there's there's this old idea 183 00:07:08,930 --> 00:07:11,569 of, partons. Right? Like, our our, 184 00:07:12,129 --> 00:07:14,050 you know, our protons, our neutrons are made 185 00:07:14,050 --> 00:07:15,910 out of smaller particles called quarks. 186 00:07:16,334 --> 00:07:16,834 Right? 187 00:07:17,214 --> 00:07:18,514 So it turns out to be 188 00:07:18,894 --> 00:07:20,654 somewhat valuable in thinking in terms of that 189 00:07:20,654 --> 00:07:24,014 perspective even for, like, you know, these these 190 00:07:24,014 --> 00:07:26,254 tabletop systems or materials. So you you can 191 00:07:26,254 --> 00:07:29,394 imagine your individual constituents consist of smaller 192 00:07:29,830 --> 00:07:31,350 degrees of freedom. Like, you can imagine a 193 00:07:31,350 --> 00:07:34,389 boson that's composed of two fermions bound together. 194 00:07:34,389 --> 00:07:34,889 Right? 195 00:07:36,150 --> 00:07:36,970 And for, 196 00:07:37,430 --> 00:07:39,050 you know, what I call trivial 197 00:07:39,670 --> 00:07:41,910 phases of matter, you can imagine that these 198 00:07:41,910 --> 00:07:45,205 these these, you know, imaginary fermions are, like, 199 00:07:45,205 --> 00:07:48,004 bound together tightly, and each boson is doing 200 00:07:48,004 --> 00:07:49,685 its own thing. So you never really see 201 00:07:49,685 --> 00:07:51,785 the fermions by themselves. Right? 202 00:07:52,085 --> 00:07:54,725 But you could imagine the possibility that these 203 00:07:54,725 --> 00:07:55,225 bosons, 204 00:07:56,165 --> 00:07:57,605 each of which have, like, a pair of 205 00:07:57,605 --> 00:07:58,585 bound fermions, 206 00:07:58,939 --> 00:08:01,919 are interacting so much that these bound fermions 207 00:08:01,979 --> 00:08:02,879 become deconfined. 208 00:08:03,740 --> 00:08:05,579 Right? It's just like how in again, 209 00:08:06,060 --> 00:08:07,680 using a particle physics analogy, 210 00:08:08,060 --> 00:08:11,180 if you have, like, protons and neutrons, like, 211 00:08:11,180 --> 00:08:12,719 high enough temperature or pressure, 212 00:08:13,185 --> 00:08:15,105 in principle, you could have quarks that are 213 00:08:15,105 --> 00:08:15,605 deconfied. 214 00:08:15,985 --> 00:08:18,404 And you you could see the individual constituents 215 00:08:18,865 --> 00:08:21,365 in in a very, you know, extreme setting. 216 00:08:21,904 --> 00:08:24,324 Right? Here, it's like the the strong interactions 217 00:08:24,785 --> 00:08:25,285 between, 218 00:08:25,824 --> 00:08:27,045 in this case, like bosons, 219 00:08:27,949 --> 00:08:29,810 that lead to the deconfident 220 00:08:30,350 --> 00:08:31,410 of this imaginary 221 00:08:31,870 --> 00:08:34,110 constituent of this fermion. And this is how 222 00:08:34,110 --> 00:08:36,670 this fermion becomes, like, unbound due to strong 223 00:08:36,670 --> 00:08:37,170 interactions 224 00:08:37,710 --> 00:08:39,649 of many collective degrees of freedom. 225 00:08:40,485 --> 00:08:43,045 And and some of these emergent phenomena, they're 226 00:08:43,045 --> 00:08:44,904 not I mean, it's not just a theoretical 227 00:08:45,205 --> 00:08:46,665 curiosity, is it? Right. 228 00:08:47,045 --> 00:08:48,485 Right. Right. Yeah. You you know, you mentioned 229 00:08:48,485 --> 00:08:48,985 topological 230 00:08:49,365 --> 00:08:51,605 Yeah. That's definitely not. So useful for computing, 231 00:08:51,605 --> 00:08:53,125 couldn't you? Yeah. So this this has, you 232 00:08:53,125 --> 00:08:55,304 know, gone all the way back until the, 233 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,139 the the nineteen eighties. So, 234 00:08:58,519 --> 00:09:00,519 there there's a system called the the fractional 235 00:09:00,519 --> 00:09:03,320 quantum hall effect, right, which basically is like 236 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:05,480 a two d electron gas in a very 237 00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:07,865 high magnetic field at low temperature. And 238 00:09:08,325 --> 00:09:11,625 and here, there there's already this phenomenon of, 239 00:09:12,325 --> 00:09:13,304 this fractionalization 240 00:09:13,845 --> 00:09:17,304 of individual particles into some smaller constituents. 241 00:09:17,924 --> 00:09:19,684 So one of the simplest example is, like, 242 00:09:19,684 --> 00:09:21,605 you have these this this two d electron 243 00:09:21,605 --> 00:09:24,149 system. You know, it's built out of electrons, 244 00:09:24,209 --> 00:09:26,629 but, again, due to strong interactions, 245 00:09:27,809 --> 00:09:28,709 you have fractionalization 246 00:09:29,089 --> 00:09:29,589 into, 247 00:09:30,529 --> 00:09:33,089 pieces of electron. For example, a third of 248 00:09:33,089 --> 00:09:35,809 the electron charge with with a third of 249 00:09:35,809 --> 00:09:36,105 its, 250 00:09:36,745 --> 00:09:39,304 particle statistics in some sense. And so, yeah, 251 00:09:39,304 --> 00:09:41,464 these these fractional quantum ball systems have been, 252 00:09:41,784 --> 00:09:42,684 seen experimentally, 253 00:09:43,784 --> 00:09:46,184 since since the eighties. So these systems, you 254 00:09:46,184 --> 00:09:47,964 know, remarkably exist. And, 255 00:09:49,279 --> 00:09:51,120 yeah, that that that's what makes this phenomenon, 256 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:54,080 of course, even more, interesting and relevant. And 257 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:55,759 and and it can be useful as well 258 00:09:55,759 --> 00:09:57,620 because I think, you know, for example, topological 259 00:09:57,919 --> 00:09:58,419 properties, 260 00:09:59,919 --> 00:10:03,345 perhaps resistant to noise, and that could be 261 00:10:03,345 --> 00:10:05,424 handy when you're trying to build a quantum 262 00:10:05,584 --> 00:10:08,725 Exactly. Exactly. So exactly. One one approach toward 263 00:10:09,345 --> 00:10:12,725 encoding this, you know, very fragile quantum information 264 00:10:12,945 --> 00:10:15,605 is to encode the information into 265 00:10:16,009 --> 00:10:16,669 the fractionalized 266 00:10:17,129 --> 00:10:19,610 pieces of the individual degrees of freedom. Right? 267 00:10:19,610 --> 00:10:20,730 So so if you if you didn't have 268 00:10:20,730 --> 00:10:23,549 fractionalization, if you just have information encoded directly 269 00:10:23,929 --> 00:10:25,149 at the physical level, 270 00:10:25,450 --> 00:10:26,909 then, you know, the that physical 271 00:10:27,210 --> 00:10:29,389 that physical degree of freedom can be corrupted 272 00:10:29,450 --> 00:10:31,664 easily by some some noise. But if you 273 00:10:31,664 --> 00:10:34,384 encode it non locally in in terms of, 274 00:10:34,865 --> 00:10:36,784 you know, fractions of the original degrees of 275 00:10:36,784 --> 00:10:38,644 freedom that are separated in space, 276 00:10:39,264 --> 00:10:42,144 then it's much less likely that some noise 277 00:10:42,144 --> 00:10:42,644 event 278 00:10:43,105 --> 00:10:45,745 will collectively corrupt all three and lead to 279 00:10:45,745 --> 00:10:48,459 a logical error. Right? So this this nonlocal 280 00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:51,339 encoding of of information is more, 281 00:10:51,799 --> 00:10:53,500 robust, and this is why, 282 00:10:54,199 --> 00:10:56,039 you know, we have this pretty promising approach 283 00:10:56,039 --> 00:11:00,139 of topological computation using these fractional oxide fractionalized 284 00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:00,860 excitations, 285 00:11:01,915 --> 00:11:02,975 to do computation. 286 00:11:03,835 --> 00:11:05,995 And, Tim, I wanted to move on to, 287 00:11:06,634 --> 00:11:07,695 quantum computers. 288 00:11:08,075 --> 00:11:09,754 Mhmm. I mean, I suppose you could think 289 00:11:09,754 --> 00:11:11,855 of a quantum computer as essentially 290 00:11:12,475 --> 00:11:15,690 a piece of quantum matter that physicists can 291 00:11:15,690 --> 00:11:17,149 control very precisely. 292 00:11:18,009 --> 00:11:20,029 Mhmm. If we were able to create 293 00:11:20,409 --> 00:11:23,449 large scale quantum computers, let's say using those 294 00:11:23,449 --> 00:11:23,949 topological 295 00:11:24,250 --> 00:11:25,049 qubits Mhmm. 296 00:11:25,690 --> 00:11:26,909 What sort of emergent 297 00:11:27,289 --> 00:11:29,485 phenomena do you think we could see? Or 298 00:11:29,485 --> 00:11:31,245 or maybe we don't know and we'll have 299 00:11:31,245 --> 00:11:31,825 to wait. 300 00:11:32,285 --> 00:11:34,384 Yeah. Exactly. I think I think this is, 301 00:11:35,245 --> 00:11:37,024 at least for me, the most 302 00:11:37,565 --> 00:11:38,065 exciting 303 00:11:38,684 --> 00:11:41,425 thing would be to, you know, see some 304 00:11:41,980 --> 00:11:44,299 phenomenon that we don't know yet how to 305 00:11:44,299 --> 00:11:46,059 understand. Right? I think that that's always the 306 00:11:46,059 --> 00:11:47,519 most exciting mode 307 00:11:48,059 --> 00:11:50,320 of of physics being done. Right? 308 00:11:50,779 --> 00:11:52,220 This for example, this is what happened for 309 00:11:52,220 --> 00:11:54,700 the the factional quantum hall effect. Right? Like, 310 00:11:54,700 --> 00:11:56,080 like, there was no prediction 311 00:11:56,475 --> 00:11:58,495 of this very interesting phenomenon beforehand. 312 00:11:58,954 --> 00:12:00,634 And so that, I think, is also true 313 00:12:00,634 --> 00:12:01,034 for this, 314 00:12:02,634 --> 00:12:03,294 you know, 315 00:12:03,914 --> 00:12:06,154 for for the quantum computers being developed right 316 00:12:06,154 --> 00:12:07,674 now. You you can think of it as 317 00:12:07,674 --> 00:12:08,975 kind of probing a new 318 00:12:10,550 --> 00:12:12,090 probing a new extreme, 319 00:12:13,590 --> 00:12:14,570 of, complexity 320 00:12:14,870 --> 00:12:16,730 access. Right? So, 321 00:12:18,310 --> 00:12:20,470 as you probably know, like, a lot of 322 00:12:20,470 --> 00:12:22,105 the the big breakthroughs, 323 00:12:22,565 --> 00:12:25,625 you know, in seeing new phenomenon from experiments 324 00:12:25,764 --> 00:12:28,904 leading to new theories has come from probing, 325 00:12:29,845 --> 00:12:30,424 in a extreme, 326 00:12:32,004 --> 00:12:33,625 point in some parameter. 327 00:12:34,259 --> 00:12:35,240 Right? Like, superconductivity, 328 00:12:35,620 --> 00:12:37,399 we're cooling down to very low temperature. 329 00:12:37,860 --> 00:12:40,100 Right? For pressure quantum ball, it's like reducing 330 00:12:40,100 --> 00:12:40,600 dimensionality 331 00:12:41,460 --> 00:12:43,379 to, you know, like, a two d plane 332 00:12:43,379 --> 00:12:46,179 applying a really high magnetic field. Right? And 333 00:12:46,179 --> 00:12:48,100 so this, you know, this this, 334 00:12:49,514 --> 00:12:51,934 development of quantum computing is, like, probing, 335 00:12:52,875 --> 00:12:53,375 this 336 00:12:53,834 --> 00:12:55,934 new access of, like, quantum coherence. 337 00:12:56,875 --> 00:13:00,315 Right? Of, like, basically, how how big of 338 00:13:00,315 --> 00:13:01,834 a system can we have, 339 00:13:02,554 --> 00:13:04,830 you know, superposition of states. 340 00:13:05,309 --> 00:13:06,830 And right? So it's this it's this new 341 00:13:06,830 --> 00:13:08,690 regime of, like, quantum complexity 342 00:13:09,389 --> 00:13:12,450 that's being now, you know, newly available. 343 00:13:13,070 --> 00:13:14,129 Right? And, 344 00:13:15,149 --> 00:13:17,149 and, yeah, again, to be I think it'd 345 00:13:17,149 --> 00:13:19,274 be the most exciting if we see, you 346 00:13:19,274 --> 00:13:21,454 know, some new phenomena that might suggest 347 00:13:21,914 --> 00:13:23,674 even, like, a, like, a breakdown in the 348 00:13:23,674 --> 00:13:26,954 current laws upon mechanics. Right? Yeah. Now that'll 349 00:13:26,954 --> 00:13:28,954 be obviously very, you know like, we we 350 00:13:28,954 --> 00:13:30,735 we don't expect it right now, but, 351 00:13:31,309 --> 00:13:32,909 that would be, I think, the most exciting 352 00:13:32,909 --> 00:13:35,230 thing. Yeah. I mean, that is a that 353 00:13:35,230 --> 00:13:37,389 is an interesting thing, isn't it? An idea 354 00:13:37,389 --> 00:13:38,129 that's emerged, 355 00:13:38,669 --> 00:13:40,990 you know, sorry about the pun, over the 356 00:13:40,990 --> 00:13:43,629 last little while is that you, you know, 357 00:13:43,629 --> 00:13:46,029 you could see that crack in in the 358 00:13:46,029 --> 00:13:47,009 standard model. 359 00:13:47,495 --> 00:13:49,334 Right. That's right. In a in a quantum 360 00:13:49,334 --> 00:13:50,955 computer rather than smashing 361 00:13:51,414 --> 00:13:53,815 particles together. You know, you could get your 362 00:13:53,815 --> 00:13:54,934 first glimpse of, 363 00:13:56,134 --> 00:13:58,534 of physics beyond what we know. That's right. 364 00:13:58,534 --> 00:14:01,529 That's right. Yeah. Yeah. It's yeah. So for 365 00:14:01,529 --> 00:14:03,690 for, I guess, beyond the center model, there 366 00:14:03,690 --> 00:14:04,590 were kind of, 367 00:14:06,090 --> 00:14:08,190 we're kind of looking at this, like, reductionist 368 00:14:08,809 --> 00:14:11,850 paradigm, right, where, you know, we have, like, 369 00:14:11,850 --> 00:14:14,410 you know, basic degrees of freedom that and 370 00:14:14,410 --> 00:14:16,855 and their laws, and we're trying to see 371 00:14:16,855 --> 00:14:18,695 what the complete description of those basic degrees 372 00:14:18,695 --> 00:14:20,615 of freedom. But but in this in this 373 00:14:20,615 --> 00:14:22,455 other axis of, like, you know, building a 374 00:14:22,455 --> 00:14:23,434 a big controllable 375 00:14:24,054 --> 00:14:24,955 quantum computer, 376 00:14:25,495 --> 00:14:27,815 right, it's like more of like a I 377 00:14:27,815 --> 00:14:29,735 don't know. The opposite of reduction is, like, 378 00:14:29,735 --> 00:14:30,235 constructionist 379 00:14:31,559 --> 00:14:33,899 philosophy. Again, this philosophy of of emergence, 380 00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:37,399 you know, coming from basic degrees of freedom, 381 00:14:37,399 --> 00:14:38,539 which we already understand, 382 00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:41,419 you know, what laws are describing them, but 383 00:14:41,639 --> 00:14:43,960 together, they lead to these emergent laws that 384 00:14:43,960 --> 00:14:44,715 that we don't, 385 00:14:45,274 --> 00:14:46,654 really know about. Right? 386 00:14:47,675 --> 00:14:50,875 So so we've chatted a bit about quantum 387 00:14:50,875 --> 00:14:52,975 computers, and I know that that's one 388 00:14:53,595 --> 00:14:55,434 interest that you have in terms of your 389 00:14:55,434 --> 00:14:55,934 research. 390 00:14:56,555 --> 00:14:59,370 Where are we at the moment with quantum 391 00:14:59,370 --> 00:15:02,090 computers? What what are the challenges facing people 392 00:15:02,090 --> 00:15:04,090 who are trying to develop them at the 393 00:15:04,090 --> 00:15:06,809 moment? Is it this this coherence problem dealing 394 00:15:06,809 --> 00:15:09,529 with the noise that Yeah. Destroys your quantum 395 00:15:09,529 --> 00:15:11,210 state? That's right. So that that that is 396 00:15:11,210 --> 00:15:13,975 the biggest challenge because, you know, quantum information 397 00:15:13,975 --> 00:15:17,355 is even more fragile than, classical information. 398 00:15:17,735 --> 00:15:20,075 Right? Because quantum information, you have to 399 00:15:20,695 --> 00:15:21,915 worry about noise, 400 00:15:22,615 --> 00:15:25,089 pretty much in along different axes. Right? So 401 00:15:25,089 --> 00:15:27,089 in in in the classical world, you only 402 00:15:27,089 --> 00:15:28,149 have one basis. 403 00:15:28,610 --> 00:15:30,230 Right? Like, one zero, 404 00:15:30,610 --> 00:15:32,210 up or down. And if you worry about 405 00:15:32,210 --> 00:15:35,190 noise, like flipping bits in that one basis. 406 00:15:35,730 --> 00:15:36,230 But, 407 00:15:37,169 --> 00:15:38,769 as you probably know, you know, a a 408 00:15:38,769 --> 00:15:39,830 qubit is, 409 00:15:40,394 --> 00:15:41,834 in some sense, almost like a like a 410 00:15:41,834 --> 00:15:44,254 continuous space. Right? You can have arbitrary superpositions 411 00:15:44,475 --> 00:15:45,995 of zero and one, and so you could 412 00:15:45,995 --> 00:15:48,894 have noise acting along all these different directions, 413 00:15:49,274 --> 00:15:50,975 along the block sphere. Right? 414 00:15:51,595 --> 00:15:53,274 And so, you have to work a lot 415 00:15:53,274 --> 00:15:54,240 harder to protect 416 00:15:54,559 --> 00:15:57,139 any quantum information that you've you've encoded. 417 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:00,259 But but that said, there's been remarkable 418 00:16:00,639 --> 00:16:03,839 experimental progress in in, a whole variety of 419 00:16:03,839 --> 00:16:06,899 approaches for quantum computing, like trapped ions, superconducting 420 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:07,605 qubits, 421 00:16:08,164 --> 00:16:09,625 red brick arrays, for example. 422 00:16:10,644 --> 00:16:12,164 And and so I think it's it's really 423 00:16:12,164 --> 00:16:14,725 exciting time where, you know, people are scaling 424 00:16:14,725 --> 00:16:18,264 up, their quantum simulators in computers. The controllability 425 00:16:18,485 --> 00:16:20,824 is improving. Their gate fidelities are improving. 426 00:16:21,159 --> 00:16:22,620 And so now this is really, 427 00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,460 like a new playground for for theorists 428 00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:29,259 to, at this point, you know, predict, 429 00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:32,679 new types of phases, for example, that can 430 00:16:32,679 --> 00:16:33,820 emerge in these systems, 431 00:16:34,445 --> 00:16:35,345 things like that. 432 00:16:36,205 --> 00:16:38,284 And, Tim, am I right that you you 433 00:16:38,284 --> 00:16:41,245 work on some quantum error correction? Is that 434 00:16:41,245 --> 00:16:43,565 right? Yeah. So, yeah. I I've been Now 435 00:16:43,565 --> 00:16:45,164 can you talk a bit about that? Because 436 00:16:45,164 --> 00:16:47,004 that, I mean, you know, as well as 437 00:16:47,004 --> 00:16:49,370 improving the fidelity or quality of a of 438 00:16:49,370 --> 00:16:52,089 a quantum Right. Right. Right. The I suppose 439 00:16:52,089 --> 00:16:53,149 for the time being, 440 00:16:53,610 --> 00:16:56,009 error correction is is a really important Right. 441 00:16:56,089 --> 00:16:57,929 Issue, isn't it? Yes. So what will what 442 00:16:57,929 --> 00:17:00,329 is quantum error correction? And Yeah. So so 443 00:17:00,329 --> 00:17:03,289 quantum error correction is is how you, you 444 00:17:03,289 --> 00:17:04,095 know, protect 445 00:17:04,414 --> 00:17:06,434 this logical infer this quantum 446 00:17:06,734 --> 00:17:10,115 information you're encoding against noise. Right? And so, 447 00:17:10,654 --> 00:17:12,835 typically, you have to, you know, measure 448 00:17:13,214 --> 00:17:13,714 certain 449 00:17:14,095 --> 00:17:14,595 syndromes 450 00:17:14,974 --> 00:17:17,234 in in your in your system, repeatedly. 451 00:17:17,809 --> 00:17:20,630 And based on those the syndrome measurement outcomes, 452 00:17:21,009 --> 00:17:21,509 decide, 453 00:17:21,890 --> 00:17:23,569 you know, what is the most likely error 454 00:17:23,569 --> 00:17:26,049 that occurred. Right? And then you'll apply some 455 00:17:26,049 --> 00:17:27,109 feedback to, 456 00:17:27,410 --> 00:17:28,549 reverse those errors. 457 00:17:28,849 --> 00:17:31,169 So that that's that's the basic idea. But, 458 00:17:31,410 --> 00:17:33,410 remarkably, that like, quantum error correction, I think, 459 00:17:33,410 --> 00:17:36,365 is extremely deep and has a lot of 460 00:17:36,365 --> 00:17:37,505 relevance to, 461 00:17:39,644 --> 00:17:43,164 beyond its, original practical intention of preserving logical 462 00:17:43,164 --> 00:17:43,664 information. 463 00:17:44,445 --> 00:17:46,605 For example, it, you know, it it provides, 464 00:17:46,605 --> 00:17:48,065 like, a new angle for, 465 00:17:49,070 --> 00:17:49,789 for interpreting, 466 00:17:50,190 --> 00:17:51,490 the the holographic 467 00:17:51,789 --> 00:17:53,330 correspondence, right, between, 468 00:17:53,950 --> 00:17:56,849 like, a, a system in one lower dimension 469 00:17:56,990 --> 00:17:59,330 and one in higher dimension with gravity. 470 00:18:00,109 --> 00:18:02,444 And and also for for me, there are 471 00:18:02,444 --> 00:18:04,125 a lot of deep connections between quantum error 472 00:18:04,125 --> 00:18:04,625 correction 473 00:18:05,164 --> 00:18:06,704 and quantum phases of matter. 474 00:18:07,325 --> 00:18:09,325 Right? So so my my interest is has 475 00:18:09,325 --> 00:18:10,704 been in kinda understanding, 476 00:18:12,284 --> 00:18:15,325 you know, the the error correcting regime versus 477 00:18:15,325 --> 00:18:17,744 the non error correcting regime as two different 478 00:18:18,029 --> 00:18:19,730 types of phase of matter. 479 00:18:20,029 --> 00:18:21,869 Right? Again, we'd like, going back to what 480 00:18:21,869 --> 00:18:23,230 you said, we can think of this quantum 481 00:18:23,230 --> 00:18:24,609 computer as some macroscopic 482 00:18:25,470 --> 00:18:27,730 quantum system, right, to be analyzed 483 00:18:28,269 --> 00:18:30,670 on the same footing as some quantum material, 484 00:18:30,670 --> 00:18:31,730 which we would conventionally, 485 00:18:32,914 --> 00:18:34,615 label as some phase of matter. 486 00:18:34,914 --> 00:18:36,914 Right. And and so yeah. So does that 487 00:18:36,914 --> 00:18:38,434 go back to, you know, you you were 488 00:18:38,434 --> 00:18:41,554 talking about top a topological state where the 489 00:18:41,554 --> 00:18:42,054 quantum 490 00:18:42,674 --> 00:18:44,275 well, the as as well as the quantum 491 00:18:44,275 --> 00:18:45,255 state is distributed 492 00:18:45,954 --> 00:18:46,434 between, 493 00:18:47,075 --> 00:18:47,974 several different 494 00:18:48,569 --> 00:18:50,250 entities. Is that I mean, is that an 495 00:18:50,250 --> 00:18:50,750 example 496 00:18:51,289 --> 00:18:54,569 maybe of a an error corrective Exactly. Yeah. 497 00:18:54,569 --> 00:18:56,089 Yeah. That that's a that's a very nice 498 00:18:56,089 --> 00:18:58,809 example of a of a topological phase of 499 00:18:58,809 --> 00:18:59,309 matter 500 00:18:59,690 --> 00:19:02,509 serving as a quantum error correcting code. 501 00:19:03,045 --> 00:19:04,725 Right? But then you can ask, you know, 502 00:19:04,725 --> 00:19:07,045 if you try to corrupt this, you know, 503 00:19:07,045 --> 00:19:09,924 with environmental noise, like, what's actually happening on 504 00:19:09,924 --> 00:19:12,565 the experimental quantum computer, at some point, it 505 00:19:12,565 --> 00:19:15,205 will lose the quantum information. Right? At some 506 00:19:15,205 --> 00:19:17,519 point, you will destroy this order. Right? So 507 00:19:17,519 --> 00:19:19,220 here, you have a case in which the 508 00:19:19,600 --> 00:19:22,000 the error correction threshold, right, that the point 509 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:22,660 at which 510 00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:25,840 you're, you know, you're you've lost the ability 511 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:27,680 to store quantum information gets, 512 00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:30,640 destroyed, and that coincides with a a phase 513 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:32,580 transition. Right? So 514 00:19:33,414 --> 00:19:35,494 so, what I've been very interested in is, 515 00:19:35,494 --> 00:19:36,954 you know, applying this 516 00:19:37,255 --> 00:19:39,515 perspective of phases of matter and phase transitions, 517 00:19:40,454 --> 00:19:40,954 to, 518 00:19:41,575 --> 00:19:43,575 error correction, like, viewing that as a phase 519 00:19:43,575 --> 00:19:45,335 of matter and, you know, importing a lot 520 00:19:45,335 --> 00:19:46,855 of the techniques we have and thinking about 521 00:19:46,855 --> 00:19:47,755 phases of matter, 522 00:19:48,309 --> 00:19:51,109 into this, air correction setting. Yeah. Well, that's 523 00:19:51,109 --> 00:19:53,509 really interesting because I've I've always maintained that 524 00:19:53,509 --> 00:19:55,750 if there's one thing a physicist loves, it's 525 00:19:55,750 --> 00:19:58,009 a phase transition. Yeah. That's true. 526 00:19:58,309 --> 00:19:59,210 That's true. Yeah. 527 00:19:59,590 --> 00:20:01,509 There's, you know, a huge amount of insight 528 00:20:01,509 --> 00:20:03,224 into a system that you can get, isn't 529 00:20:03,224 --> 00:20:05,224 there, by watching? And there's a lot of, 530 00:20:05,304 --> 00:20:06,744 you know, like, notions of, 531 00:20:07,144 --> 00:20:09,224 universality. Right? The whole the whole idea of 532 00:20:09,224 --> 00:20:10,664 thinking about a phase of matter is that 533 00:20:10,664 --> 00:20:13,005 you don't have to deal with every individual 534 00:20:13,224 --> 00:20:16,285 system, right, and their, you know, different microscopic 535 00:20:16,505 --> 00:20:19,089 properties. You you care about the universal long 536 00:20:19,089 --> 00:20:21,589 distance physics, what's common to the whole, 537 00:20:22,210 --> 00:20:23,349 set of these systems. 538 00:20:23,809 --> 00:20:25,250 Right? And that that's a powerful way of 539 00:20:25,250 --> 00:20:27,329 thinking that I think, again, gives you some 540 00:20:27,329 --> 00:20:30,470 insights into these error correcting or not regimes. 541 00:20:31,964 --> 00:20:34,045 And and finally, Tim, I I wanted to, 542 00:20:35,085 --> 00:20:36,845 to to, you know, ask you about, 543 00:20:37,644 --> 00:20:40,204 your wish list Mhmm. For for quantum. You 544 00:20:40,204 --> 00:20:41,184 know, let's say, 545 00:20:41,884 --> 00:20:43,884 sometime in the future, not too far in 546 00:20:43,884 --> 00:20:46,710 the future, Mhmm. You know, people are able 547 00:20:46,710 --> 00:20:47,850 to build 548 00:20:48,470 --> 00:20:50,490 reasonably large quantum computers. 549 00:20:51,029 --> 00:20:54,009 Uh-huh. What what I mean, what sort of 550 00:20:54,230 --> 00:20:56,309 well, I don't know if if is program 551 00:20:56,309 --> 00:20:58,255 the right word? What would you like to 552 00:20:58,255 --> 00:21:00,095 run on a quantum computer? What sort of 553 00:21:00,095 --> 00:21:01,555 system would you like to simulate 554 00:21:02,015 --> 00:21:03,954 or create on that computer? 555 00:21:04,255 --> 00:21:06,815 What what would be your first? Mhmm. I 556 00:21:06,815 --> 00:21:08,434 see. Yeah. That's that's a 557 00:21:09,055 --> 00:21:10,115 that's a good question. 558 00:21:12,015 --> 00:21:12,515 So 559 00:21:13,369 --> 00:21:16,029 I guess, you know, given my condensed matter 560 00:21:16,730 --> 00:21:18,990 background of, you know, dealing with very 561 00:21:20,330 --> 00:21:21,230 hard models, 562 00:21:21,690 --> 00:21:24,250 you know, that we think describe real quantum 563 00:21:24,250 --> 00:21:26,330 materials that we have yet to solve, I 564 00:21:26,330 --> 00:21:28,154 think I would still like to, you know, 565 00:21:28,154 --> 00:21:29,375 probably use a quantum 566 00:21:29,755 --> 00:21:32,715 computer to gain insights into those effective models 567 00:21:32,715 --> 00:21:33,695 of quantum materials. 568 00:21:34,795 --> 00:21:37,035 For example, there are, you know, these these 569 00:21:37,035 --> 00:21:39,855 thing called Hubbard models, which are effective descriptions 570 00:21:39,994 --> 00:21:41,934 of, like, high temperature, superconductors, 571 00:21:43,500 --> 00:21:45,980 things like that. And, you know, they're they're 572 00:21:45,980 --> 00:21:46,480 very 573 00:21:47,340 --> 00:21:50,539 they're somewhat intractable for our classical computers to 574 00:21:50,539 --> 00:21:52,140 handle. And, also, we don't have that many 575 00:21:52,140 --> 00:21:53,599 great analytical techniques 576 00:21:54,059 --> 00:21:54,884 often to do. 577 00:21:55,605 --> 00:21:58,644 And so, you know, using some analog quantum 578 00:21:58,644 --> 00:22:00,984 simulator or maybe even a digital quantum computer, 579 00:22:02,484 --> 00:22:04,404 if we can get insights into, you know, 580 00:22:04,404 --> 00:22:06,105 like, the finite temperature properties 581 00:22:06,724 --> 00:22:07,285 of these, 582 00:22:07,684 --> 00:22:08,424 you know, 583 00:22:08,884 --> 00:22:10,265 strongly directing Hamiltonians, 584 00:22:10,819 --> 00:22:12,519 right, or, you know, like, the dynamics, 585 00:22:13,619 --> 00:22:15,380 I think that would be very, very useful 586 00:22:15,380 --> 00:22:16,519 and insightful. 587 00:22:17,299 --> 00:22:19,640 And I suppose beyond, you know, the 588 00:22:20,099 --> 00:22:21,160 the the pure physics, 589 00:22:21,700 --> 00:22:23,460 if you could get a handle on those 590 00:22:23,460 --> 00:22:25,654 materials. Mhmm. That I mean, that would be 591 00:22:25,654 --> 00:22:28,394 a revolution in material science, wouldn't it? Right. 592 00:22:28,535 --> 00:22:30,075 Right. Yeah. You could design 593 00:22:30,454 --> 00:22:31,275 some amazing 594 00:22:31,815 --> 00:22:34,214 material. That's right. That's right. Yeah. Yeah. So 595 00:22:34,214 --> 00:22:36,855 maybe maybe learning more about these effective models, 596 00:22:36,855 --> 00:22:39,095 their, you know, their final temperature properties would 597 00:22:39,095 --> 00:22:41,320 would give us insight into 598 00:22:41,940 --> 00:22:44,500 maybe, you know, how to design materials with, 599 00:22:44,500 --> 00:22:46,359 like, higher TC, for example. 600 00:22:47,140 --> 00:22:47,640 Yeah. 601 00:22:48,340 --> 00:22:50,500 Well, thanks, Tim. Thanks for for speaking to 602 00:22:50,500 --> 00:22:52,740 me, and, I hope that your dream will 603 00:22:52,740 --> 00:22:55,255 come true. Yeah. Yeah. You'll get to, to 604 00:22:55,255 --> 00:22:58,294 do those those calculations or experiments or whatever 605 00:22:58,294 --> 00:23:00,054 you want to call it Yeah. Yeah. On 606 00:23:00,054 --> 00:23:02,294 the quantum computer sometime in the future. Thanks 607 00:23:02,294 --> 00:23:04,954 for coming on the podcast. Thanks, Alish. Thanks. 608 00:23:13,450 --> 00:23:16,269 That was Tim Shea of the Perimeter Institute 609 00:23:16,330 --> 00:23:17,869 for Theoretical Physics. 610 00:23:18,410 --> 00:23:20,910 Thanks to Tim for a fascinating discussion 611 00:23:21,289 --> 00:23:22,910 about all things quantum. 612 00:23:23,450 --> 00:23:25,789 And thank you for listening to this podcast, 613 00:23:26,204 --> 00:23:28,224 which is supported by the APS 614 00:23:28,845 --> 00:23:30,384 Global Physics Summit. 615 00:23:31,005 --> 00:23:32,464 To continue advancing 616 00:23:32,765 --> 00:23:34,704 physics beyond this podcast, 617 00:23:35,244 --> 00:23:36,784 participate in the APS 618 00:23:37,565 --> 00:23:39,184 Global Physics Summit 619 00:23:39,599 --> 00:23:42,090 on March 620 00:23:42,090 --> 00:23:44,420 2026 621 00:23:44,880 --> 00:23:46,259 in Denver, Colorado, 622 00:23:46,799 --> 00:23:47,940 and online. 623 00:23:48,799 --> 00:23:49,299 Experience 624 00:23:49,599 --> 00:23:50,339 high impact 625 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:51,779 scientific sessions, 626 00:23:52,375 --> 00:23:53,434 networking opportunities, 627 00:23:54,054 --> 00:23:54,554 workshops, 628 00:23:55,015 --> 00:23:56,954 and community building events 629 00:23:57,255 --> 00:23:59,434 designed for every career stage. 630 00:24:00,134 --> 00:24:02,535 Learn how you can attend and shape the 631 00:24:02,535 --> 00:24:07,674 future of physics at summit.aps.org. 632 00:24:08,289 --> 00:24:10,849 We'll be back again next week with our 633 00:24:10,849 --> 00:24:13,109 top 10 breakthroughs in physics 634 00:24:13,410 --> 00:24:15,109 for 2025. 635 00:24:15,570 --> 00:24:19,029 Thanks to Fred Iles for producing this episode.