The Kavli Prize in Astrophysics: meet the 2024 laureates David Charbonneau and Sara Seager

Physics World Weekly Podcast

This episode features a wide-ranging interview with Sara Seager and David Charbonneau, who share the 2024 Kavli Prize in Astrophysics. Charbonneau is at Harvard University and Seager is at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and they won the prize for their discoveries of exoplanets and the characterization of their atmospheres.

Exoplanets are planets that orbit stars other than the Sun. Astronomers have confirmed the existence of more than 5000 exoplanets, and that number keeps increasing.

In this podcast, the two laureates talk about the astonishing range of exoplanets that have been observed and explain how astronomers study the atmospheres of these faint and distant objects. Seager and Charbonneau also talk about the search for biosignatures of life on distant exoplanets and look to the future of exoplanet astronomy.

This podcast is sponsored by The Kavli Prize.

2024-06-13 36 min Transcript

Available Results

Generated results are saved to the knowledge database for reuse and search.

No generated results are available for this episode yet.

Extract Knowledge

Pick what you want extracted first. Model, scope, and chapter options appear after a template is selected.

Generated results for public episodes are saved to the knowledge database so they can be reused and searched later.

Transcript

1
00:00:09,172 --> 00:00:12,191
Hello, and welcome to the Physics World weekly

2
00:00:12,191 --> 00:00:12,691
podcast.

3
00:00:13,144 --> 00:00:14,256
I'm Hamish Johnston.

4
00:00:14,891 --> 00:00:18,148
This episode is sponsored by the cavalry prize.

5
00:00:19,276 --> 00:00:22,481
The cavalry prize honors scientists for breakthroughs

6
00:00:22,856 --> 00:00:23,754
in astro,

7
00:00:24,606 --> 00:00:26,992
nano neuroscience, and neuroscience.

8
00:00:27,803 --> 00:00:31,567
Transforming our understanding of the big, the small

9
00:00:31,703 --> 00:00:32,601
and the complex.

10
00:00:33,614 --> 00:00:36,178
The vision for the cavalry prize comes from

11
00:00:36,418 --> 00:00:39,632
Fred C, a Norwegian American entrepreneur

12
00:00:40,170 --> 00:00:40,909
and philanthropist

13
00:00:41,686 --> 00:00:43,064
who turned his lifelong

14
00:00:43,842 --> 00:00:44,720
fascination with science.

15
00:00:45,454 --> 00:00:48,594
Into a lasting legacy for recognizing

16
00:00:49,054 --> 00:00:50,274
scientific breakthroughs

17
00:00:50,655 --> 00:00:52,354
and for supporting basic

18
00:00:52,814 --> 00:00:53,054
research.

19
00:00:53,869 --> 00:00:55,549
The 20 24

20
00:00:55,549 --> 00:00:57,570
cavalry prize in astro

21
00:00:58,270 --> 00:00:59,570
was announced yesterday

22
00:01:00,189 --> 00:01:01,869
on the twelfth of June.

23
00:01:03,483 --> 00:01:05,892
I'm very pleased to have this year's Lau

24
00:01:06,347 --> 00:01:08,653
join me down the line from Cambridge

25
00:01:09,210 --> 00:01:09,687
Massachusetts.

26
00:01:10,419 --> 00:01:12,436
They are David Char

27
00:01:12,814 --> 00:01:14,032
of Harvard University

28
00:01:14,730 --> 00:01:17,705
and Sara Sig of the Massachusetts

29
00:01:18,322 --> 00:01:19,221
institute of technology.

30
00:01:20,254 --> 00:01:23,311
They share this year's cavalry prize in astro

31
00:01:23,850 --> 00:01:24,989
for their groundbreaking

32
00:01:25,368 --> 00:01:27,946
work on the discovery and

33
00:01:28,645 --> 00:01:32,575
characterization of extra solar planets and their atmospheres.

34
00:01:33,134 --> 00:01:34,332
Hi, Sarah, and David,

35
00:01:34,891 --> 00:01:36,110
welcome to the podcast.

36
00:01:36,504 --> 00:01:37,004
And

37
00:01:37,621 --> 00:01:40,754
congratulations for winning the Cavalry prize in astro.

38
00:01:41,451 --> 00:01:43,207
Thank you. It's great to be here. It's

39
00:01:43,207 --> 00:01:44,895
great to be here with you. So, Sarah,

40
00:01:45,133 --> 00:01:46,801
my my first question is for you.

41
00:01:47,595 --> 00:01:50,454
Astronomers have confirmed the existence of more than

42
00:01:50,454 --> 00:01:51,351
5000

43
00:01:51,963 --> 00:01:52,281
exoplanets.

44
00:01:52,853 --> 00:01:54,688
And that number keeps rising.

45
00:01:55,326 --> 00:01:56,544
And they have wonderful

46
00:01:57,081 --> 00:01:59,154
descriptions such as hot jupiter,

47
00:01:59,793 --> 00:02:00,691
mini neptune,

48
00:02:01,148 --> 00:02:02,265
and super earth.

49
00:02:03,077 --> 00:02:04,989
Can you give us a flavor of the

50
00:02:04,989 --> 00:02:08,733
different types of exoplanets that astronomers know of?

51
00:02:09,865 --> 00:02:12,504
Well, what's really truly amazing is there's a

52
00:02:12,504 --> 00:02:14,585
continuum of planets in terms of their mass,

53
00:02:15,465 --> 00:02:18,344
sizes and orbits, and it's very astonishing and

54
00:02:18,344 --> 00:02:19,360
what's completely unexpected.

55
00:02:20,513 --> 00:02:22,581
But these hot jupiter, they're just jupiter,

56
00:02:23,297 --> 00:02:24,990
mass, jupiter sized planets

57
00:02:25,922 --> 00:02:27,991
that are extremely close to there's host stars.

58
00:02:28,324 --> 00:02:31,836
So their atmospheres are heated to 3000

59
00:02:31,836 --> 00:02:32,874
even 3000 kelvin.

60
00:02:34,311 --> 00:02:37,046
The mini neptune are particularly exciting because

61
00:02:37,358 --> 00:02:39,108
Right now, we think we're on the verge

62
00:02:39,108 --> 00:02:41,416
of figuring out what they actually are. Their

63
00:02:41,416 --> 00:02:43,325
planets in between the size of earth's and

64
00:02:43,484 --> 00:02:43,882
Neptune.

65
00:02:44,933 --> 00:02:47,008
Earth, neptune is 4 times the size of

66
00:02:47,008 --> 00:02:47,168
earth.

67
00:02:47,887 --> 00:02:49,743
And so far, these

68
00:02:50,121 --> 00:02:52,516
mini neptune appear to be incredibly common in

69
00:02:52,516 --> 00:02:54,605
our galaxy. Yet, we have no solar system

70
00:02:54,605 --> 00:02:55,084
counterpart,

71
00:02:55,642 --> 00:02:57,875
and they have a very awkward ambiguous average

72
00:02:57,875 --> 00:03:00,348
density, so we don't know, for example, if

73
00:03:00,348 --> 00:03:03,194
they're rocky world surrounded by a subs,

74
00:03:04,028 --> 00:03:06,886
hydrogen or hydrogen helium envelope, or if they're

75
00:03:06,886 --> 00:03:09,586
this mysterious water world, a type of scaled

76
00:03:09,586 --> 00:03:11,570
up version of 1 of Jupiter's Icy moons

77
00:03:11,570 --> 00:03:12,070
that's

78
00:03:12,699 --> 00:03:13,979
largely water by mass.

79
00:03:14,780 --> 00:03:16,620
But there's so many. We could literally just

80
00:03:16,620 --> 00:03:18,379
have a monologue hours long of all the

81
00:03:18,379 --> 00:03:20,946
different planet types out there, they seem strange

82
00:03:20,946 --> 00:03:23,909
to us, but it it is that simply

83
00:03:23,966 --> 00:03:26,111
because we we only know about the solar

84
00:03:26,111 --> 00:03:28,746
system, and you know, the the the idea

85
00:03:28,746 --> 00:03:31,229
of a of a a hot Jupiter was

86
00:03:31,364 --> 00:03:34,855
almost beyond our imagination before we started detecting

87
00:03:34,855 --> 00:03:35,014
them.

88
00:03:35,743 --> 00:03:37,570
That's right. It's never good in science when

89
00:03:37,570 --> 00:03:39,238
we only have 1 example to build an

90
00:03:39,238 --> 00:03:41,383
entire theory on planet information based on the

91
00:03:41,383 --> 00:03:41,939
solar system.

92
00:03:42,575 --> 00:03:45,554
So the large majority of... Astronomers of scientists

93
00:03:45,611 --> 00:03:48,078
were completely shocked about the hot jupiter and

94
00:03:48,078 --> 00:03:50,704
everything else. But by now, honestly, we've learned

95
00:03:50,704 --> 00:03:51,420
to be surprised.

96
00:03:52,154 --> 00:03:53,672
1 thing we're dying to know, at least

97
00:03:53,832 --> 00:03:56,309
I'm dying to know is how common is

98
00:03:56,309 --> 00:03:57,188
our solar system.

99
00:03:57,747 --> 00:03:59,905
Our solar system is actually very hard to

100
00:03:59,905 --> 00:04:01,908
find. That works in our favor, we might

101
00:04:01,908 --> 00:04:03,124
not be here talking

102
00:04:03,577 --> 00:04:05,802
because we've had such a rich diversity of

103
00:04:05,802 --> 00:04:06,835
planets to discover.

104
00:04:07,883 --> 00:04:09,391
But in the near future, we hope to

105
00:04:09,391 --> 00:04:10,740
get an answer for that with 1 of

106
00:04:10,740 --> 00:04:13,145
our next telescopes the Nancy Grace Roman telescope

107
00:04:13,201 --> 00:04:15,662
that's going to do a micro lens survey

108
00:04:15,662 --> 00:04:17,506
and can take the sense. But right now,

109
00:04:17,666 --> 00:04:19,579
it could be that, you know, 10 percent

110
00:04:19,579 --> 00:04:21,333
or less of sunlight like Sars have an

111
00:04:21,333 --> 00:04:22,131
actual solar system.

112
00:04:22,768 --> 00:04:24,385
Do you have a you're you're a pioneer

113
00:04:24,602 --> 00:04:27,728
in the the study of the atmospheres of

114
00:04:28,287 --> 00:04:28,686
Exoplanets.

115
00:04:29,244 --> 00:04:30,382
How do astronomers

116
00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:33,962
study the atmospheres of these planets that are

117
00:04:33,962 --> 00:04:36,926
so far away and and so faint

118
00:04:37,300 --> 00:04:40,241
compared to the stars that they orbit,

119
00:04:41,053 --> 00:04:42,351
There are 2

120
00:04:42,808 --> 00:04:44,106
related methods

121
00:04:44,802 --> 00:04:47,036
that astronomers use and that Sarah and I

122
00:04:47,036 --> 00:04:51,212
have used to explore the atmospheres of these

123
00:04:51,507 --> 00:04:51,826
exoplanets.

124
00:04:52,860 --> 00:04:54,665
And they both have to do with

125
00:04:55,184 --> 00:04:57,901
a very special geometry. When our line of

126
00:04:57,901 --> 00:05:01,337
sight is aligned with the orbit of the

127
00:05:01,337 --> 00:05:03,096
planet around the star, and that means that

128
00:05:03,096 --> 00:05:05,523
once every orbit the planet passes

129
00:05:05,977 --> 00:05:07,010
in front of the star.

130
00:05:07,725 --> 00:05:10,109
And when it does so, some of the

131
00:05:10,109 --> 00:05:11,142
light from the star,

132
00:05:11,713 --> 00:05:12,769
passes through

133
00:05:13,142 --> 00:05:15,207
the atmosphere of the planet. And so if

134
00:05:15,207 --> 00:05:16,557
you were if you were looking at the

135
00:05:16,557 --> 00:05:19,098
start at that exact moment, you could imagine

136
00:05:19,098 --> 00:05:20,899
seeing this little planet in front of it

137
00:05:21,099 --> 00:05:23,435
and then seeing an ann, which is the

138
00:05:23,493 --> 00:05:24,690
atmosphere surrounding that planet.

139
00:05:25,488 --> 00:05:27,643
And so what we're doing is we're using

140
00:05:27,643 --> 00:05:28,941
the light from the star

141
00:05:29,334 --> 00:05:31,327
as a probe as a as a back

142
00:05:31,327 --> 00:05:31,827
light

143
00:05:32,603 --> 00:05:34,538
to probe the atmospheric chemistry,

144
00:05:35,075 --> 00:05:36,931
and that means that we don't have to

145
00:05:37,308 --> 00:05:38,286
spatial resolve

146
00:05:38,677 --> 00:05:39,949
the planet from the star. We don't have

147
00:05:39,949 --> 00:05:40,983
to be able to take a picture of

148
00:05:40,983 --> 00:05:42,652
the planet isolated from its star,

149
00:05:43,606 --> 00:05:46,014
which is very demanding in terms of optical

150
00:05:46,070 --> 00:05:47,501
design. We can instead use this,

151
00:05:48,153 --> 00:05:50,304
this trick and many, many people now use

152
00:05:50,304 --> 00:05:51,579
this trick all the time.

153
00:05:53,332 --> 00:05:53,832
The

154
00:05:54,288 --> 00:05:57,099
the other method is when the planet passes

155
00:05:57,157 --> 00:05:58,129
behind the star,

156
00:05:59,247 --> 00:06:00,765
then the planet is entirely out of you,

157
00:06:00,925 --> 00:06:02,443
and you might think well, that's no good

158
00:06:02,443 --> 00:06:03,801
because we're not seeing any life from the

159
00:06:03,801 --> 00:06:06,448
planet. But what that allows us to do

160
00:06:06,448 --> 00:06:07,825
is to measure the

161
00:06:08,679 --> 00:06:11,707
radiation, the thermal radiation from the star by

162
00:06:11,707 --> 00:06:12,026
itself.

163
00:06:12,756 --> 00:06:15,058
And we can then subtract that from data

164
00:06:15,058 --> 00:06:17,281
gathered at any other time when we have

165
00:06:17,281 --> 00:06:19,425
both the thermal radiation from the planet in

166
00:06:19,425 --> 00:06:21,831
the star and whatever's is left over, okay,

167
00:06:22,070 --> 00:06:24,385
However, small that residual signal might be. That

168
00:06:24,385 --> 00:06:25,821
is the radiation from the planet.

169
00:06:26,540 --> 00:06:29,350
And that's complimentary because that tells us the

170
00:06:29,350 --> 00:06:30,550
actual thermal emission,

171
00:06:31,269 --> 00:06:33,189
whereas the first method tells us about the

172
00:06:33,189 --> 00:06:33,670
opacity.

173
00:06:34,709 --> 00:06:36,149
And so we can learn a a great

174
00:06:36,149 --> 00:06:37,189
deal from these 2 methods.

175
00:06:38,242 --> 00:06:40,872
And David, when when you study the the

176
00:06:40,872 --> 00:06:44,459
light that that travels through the atmosphere, are

177
00:06:44,459 --> 00:06:47,256
you looking at bit? At light at certain

178
00:06:47,256 --> 00:06:49,104
frequencies that's been removed

179
00:06:49,556 --> 00:06:51,301
from the solar spectrum,

180
00:06:52,333 --> 00:06:54,569
or can can can you actually see light

181
00:06:54,569 --> 00:06:56,076
that's given off by,

182
00:06:56,869 --> 00:06:59,408
molecules and atoms in the atmosphere?

183
00:06:59,979 --> 00:07:02,056
That's right. The the ideas we're seeing the

184
00:07:02,056 --> 00:07:02,556
absorption

185
00:07:03,015 --> 00:07:03,915
due to whatever

186
00:07:04,373 --> 00:07:07,170
atoms or molecules are present in the atmosphere.

187
00:07:07,582 --> 00:07:09,167
And so as the light from the star

188
00:07:09,167 --> 00:07:11,862
passes through, certain specific wavelengths blanks are removed,

189
00:07:12,179 --> 00:07:13,605
and that's because they're being absorbed.

190
00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:16,243
And course, that only happens at the exact

191
00:07:16,243 --> 00:07:17,677
moment when the planet goes in front of

192
00:07:17,677 --> 00:07:19,212
the star. So we we can

193
00:07:19,987 --> 00:07:22,376
be be confident that that absorption really is

194
00:07:22,376 --> 00:07:23,944
due to the planetary atmosphere. Of

195
00:07:24,782 --> 00:07:27,095
But but we can't see emission at the

196
00:07:27,095 --> 00:07:29,429
moment or maybe we'll never see

197
00:07:29,806 --> 00:07:32,300
emission from the atmosphere because the star is

198
00:07:32,359 --> 00:07:33,395
is just so bright.

199
00:07:34,048 --> 00:07:37,177
We didn't don't see emission during transmission spectroscopy

200
00:07:37,394 --> 00:07:38,829
because the light from the star goes through

201
00:07:38,829 --> 00:07:40,104
the atmosphere and gets absorbed.

202
00:07:40,741 --> 00:07:42,574
And yes, the light is re emitted, but

203
00:07:42,574 --> 00:07:44,499
in all directions. So there's just such a

204
00:07:44,499 --> 00:07:46,965
tiny amount we never see it. Yeah. So,

205
00:07:47,124 --> 00:07:48,954
no. We do very much wanna study the

206
00:07:48,954 --> 00:07:50,386
emission from the planetary atmosphere.

207
00:07:50,957 --> 00:07:52,468
But the the best time to do that

208
00:07:52,468 --> 00:07:54,058
is not when the planets in front of

209
00:07:54,058 --> 00:07:57,158
the star, but rather when it is at

210
00:07:57,158 --> 00:07:58,430
some other point in its orbit.

211
00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:00,991
So so you can imagine if you were

212
00:08:00,991 --> 00:08:02,843
looking at the system and seeing it at

213
00:08:02,980 --> 00:08:05,367
quad we're seeing at what we would call

214
00:08:05,367 --> 00:08:07,356
a a quarter moon if you were imagining.

215
00:08:07,689 --> 00:08:09,850
The analog of the moon around the earth.

216
00:08:10,009 --> 00:08:11,129
And so you see some,

217
00:08:12,250 --> 00:08:14,410
radiation, some thermal emission from the planet and

218
00:08:14,410 --> 00:08:16,181
some from the star, You have to be

219
00:08:16,181 --> 00:08:17,615
able to subtract the light from the star

220
00:08:17,615 --> 00:08:19,367
and you do that by getting those measurements

221
00:08:19,367 --> 00:08:21,278
when the planet goes behind the star. So

222
00:08:21,278 --> 00:08:23,827
you take measurements to different times and difference

223
00:08:23,827 --> 00:08:23,986
them.

224
00:08:24,639 --> 00:08:27,591
And this allows you to not only see

225
00:08:27,591 --> 00:08:30,144
the actual emitted spectrum, but to actually see

226
00:08:30,144 --> 00:08:31,442
how that spectrum changes

227
00:08:32,072 --> 00:08:33,740
as the planet completes its orbit.

228
00:08:34,534 --> 00:08:36,996
And and it would change because the the

229
00:08:36,996 --> 00:08:39,457
temperature of the of the planet is changing.

230
00:08:40,029 --> 00:08:42,590
Is that, could you actually see that? Yeah.

231
00:08:42,830 --> 00:08:44,670
Not just the temperature, but you can you

232
00:08:44,670 --> 00:08:47,230
can see that the chemistry then changes because

233
00:08:47,230 --> 00:08:49,149
the temperature is changing, so you have different...

234
00:08:49,563 --> 00:08:51,315
Atoms or molecules that might be present,

235
00:08:52,668 --> 00:08:54,578
and we can actually see wins. We can

236
00:08:54,578 --> 00:08:55,397
actually see

237
00:08:55,772 --> 00:08:57,340
the... There's evidence that

238
00:08:58,099 --> 00:08:59,856
you know, the heated gas from the day

239
00:08:59,856 --> 00:09:01,614
side of the planet is flowing around to

240
00:09:01,614 --> 00:09:03,632
the night side of the planet. So,

241
00:09:04,090 --> 00:09:06,174
you know, when the data are up high

242
00:09:06,174 --> 00:09:08,740
quality, we get access to a lot of

243
00:09:09,035 --> 00:09:09,773
the dynamics

244
00:09:10,466 --> 00:09:11,363
and the chemistry

245
00:09:11,737 --> 00:09:13,167
of of the planetary atmosphere.

246
00:09:13,897 --> 00:09:15,961
Wow. I mean, that is incredible when you

247
00:09:15,961 --> 00:09:18,500
consider how far away these things are. So

248
00:09:18,659 --> 00:09:21,198
David, using these techniques, what have we learned

249
00:09:21,198 --> 00:09:23,836
so far about exoplanet atmospheres.

250
00:09:24,472 --> 00:09:27,279
Well, in in many ways, we've learned

251
00:09:27,892 --> 00:09:28,688
a great deal,

252
00:09:29,498 --> 00:09:32,282
And in many ways, we've learned almost nothing,

253
00:09:32,601 --> 00:09:34,748
and there's and there's a very exciting future

254
00:09:34,748 --> 00:09:35,385
in front of us.

255
00:09:36,513 --> 00:09:38,422
For certain kinds of planets,

256
00:09:38,978 --> 00:09:40,410
and in particular for what we call the

257
00:09:40,410 --> 00:09:41,125
hot jupiter,

258
00:09:41,762 --> 00:09:43,591
we've had access to a very rich data

259
00:09:43,591 --> 00:09:45,579
set, and that's simply because they're the easiest

260
00:09:45,579 --> 00:09:45,976
to study.

261
00:09:46,785 --> 00:09:48,769
Okay? So the hot jupiter, as you might

262
00:09:48,769 --> 00:09:51,149
imagine, are both the physically the largest planets

263
00:09:51,149 --> 00:09:52,816
that are out there, but they're also the

264
00:09:52,816 --> 00:09:53,371
hottest ones.

265
00:09:53,943 --> 00:09:55,538
And so when they pass in front of

266
00:09:55,538 --> 00:09:56,096
their star,

267
00:09:56,733 --> 00:09:57,233
their

268
00:09:57,610 --> 00:10:00,480
atmosphere, that ann that you're viewing in transmission

269
00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:01,836
that ring of atmosphere,

270
00:10:02,728 --> 00:10:05,442
is very large, both because the planet is

271
00:10:05,442 --> 00:10:07,836
large and because the atmosphere is puffy because

272
00:10:07,836 --> 00:10:08,954
the atmosphere is hot.

273
00:10:09,832 --> 00:10:12,398
And so in in that case, we've been

274
00:10:12,398 --> 00:10:13,274
able to

275
00:10:13,991 --> 00:10:16,860
detect many molecules. So the first detection was

276
00:10:16,860 --> 00:10:17,736
sodium atom,

277
00:10:18,629 --> 00:10:20,970
but we now have been able to detect

278
00:10:21,350 --> 00:10:21,750
water,

279
00:10:22,230 --> 00:10:23,509
a carbon dioxide,

280
00:10:24,629 --> 00:10:26,329
carbon dioxide, methane,

281
00:10:27,603 --> 00:10:28,103
and

282
00:10:28,554 --> 00:10:31,091
now we're seeing evidence of photo chemistry. We're

283
00:10:31,091 --> 00:10:33,890
actually seeing products that we would only expect

284
00:10:34,104 --> 00:10:36,829
due to this specific interaction of the radiation,

285
00:10:37,070 --> 00:10:39,789
changing the actual chemistry of the atmosphere rather

286
00:10:39,789 --> 00:10:41,870
than just the atmosphere being hot. Okay?

287
00:10:43,404 --> 00:10:45,160
And as I mentioned, we can also make

288
00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:47,155
maps of the planets. So for these hot

289
00:10:47,155 --> 00:10:47,634
jupiter,

290
00:10:48,193 --> 00:10:50,188
we can actually measure the thermal emission as

291
00:10:50,188 --> 00:10:52,359
they orbit around their star. And we can

292
00:10:52,359 --> 00:10:54,197
see to what extent some of the planets

293
00:10:54,197 --> 00:10:57,153
are able to take the the the radiation

294
00:10:57,153 --> 00:10:59,171
that's dumped onto to the hot bay side

295
00:10:59,231 --> 00:11:01,161
because we think most of these Planets are

296
00:11:01,161 --> 00:11:03,231
tit locked. They always present the same face

297
00:11:03,231 --> 00:11:04,983
to the star, and we can see that

298
00:11:04,983 --> 00:11:07,053
red distributed around to the night side. The

299
00:11:07,053 --> 00:11:08,965
night side is not cold. Is my point.

300
00:11:09,139 --> 00:11:10,566
The night side is a little bit colder,

301
00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:13,343
but it's not it's not perfectly cold, and

302
00:11:13,343 --> 00:11:15,509
that indicates that some heat is being transported.

303
00:11:16,772 --> 00:11:18,924
And and there's of course, this incredibly rich

304
00:11:18,924 --> 00:11:20,758
dataset set now coming out of the James

305
00:11:20,758 --> 00:11:24,287
webb space telescope, which is really unprecedented,

306
00:11:24,839 --> 00:11:26,536
both in terms of its

307
00:11:26,914 --> 00:11:28,591
aperture. Okay. I can collect a lot of

308
00:11:28,591 --> 00:11:30,666
light during these very special moments. There's only

309
00:11:30,666 --> 00:11:32,103
a few hours when the planet goes in

310
00:11:32,103 --> 00:11:33,061
front of the star, we have to get

311
00:11:33,061 --> 00:11:34,909
as much data as we can,

312
00:11:35,946 --> 00:11:38,178
but it's also very sensitive to infrared wavelengths.

313
00:11:38,417 --> 00:11:40,808
And most molecules, of course, are active. We

314
00:11:40,808 --> 00:11:44,274
see their features at infrared wavelengths. And so

315
00:11:44,413 --> 00:11:46,328
the James Webb space telescope is really, very,

316
00:11:46,487 --> 00:11:49,200
very special. Okay. So that's the good news.

317
00:11:49,772 --> 00:11:53,129
The bad news is that for the smaller

318
00:11:53,422 --> 00:11:56,437
rocky planets, planets like the Earth and venus.

319
00:11:57,246 --> 00:12:00,502
We know essentially nothing, and that is because

320
00:12:00,502 --> 00:12:01,875
the atmospheres are,

321
00:12:02,408 --> 00:12:05,425
tiny, and the atmospheres are colder compared to

322
00:12:05,425 --> 00:12:07,749
the hot Jupiter. And so we just don't

323
00:12:07,749 --> 00:12:08,967
yet have the sensitivity.

324
00:12:09,663 --> 00:12:11,757
Now, for certain systems,

325
00:12:12,134 --> 00:12:14,287
we are able to begin those studies.

326
00:12:15,179 --> 00:12:18,539
And those are for small stars, which astronomers

327
00:12:18,539 --> 00:12:20,299
call red dwarf or m dwarf.

328
00:12:21,019 --> 00:12:22,539
And by shrinking the star,

329
00:12:23,195 --> 00:12:25,115
Okay? We... We're shrinking some of the noise

330
00:12:25,115 --> 00:12:26,795
that we're trying to overcome. The bright light

331
00:12:26,795 --> 00:12:28,955
of the star is something that we have

332
00:12:28,955 --> 00:12:30,154
to to manage.

333
00:12:30,649 --> 00:12:32,503
Okay? It allows us to probe the planetary

334
00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:34,073
atmosphere, but it also causes a lot of

335
00:12:34,073 --> 00:12:35,029
noise in our measurements.

336
00:12:35,666 --> 00:12:37,418
And so when we find these small Rocky

337
00:12:37,418 --> 00:12:39,170
planets orbiting these m dwarf.

338
00:12:39,903 --> 00:12:42,376
Then we can access them if the M

339
00:12:42,376 --> 00:12:44,610
dwarf planets are also very hot. And so

340
00:12:44,610 --> 00:12:45,509
there's a few

341
00:12:45,887 --> 00:12:46,387
systems,

342
00:12:47,098 --> 00:12:49,722
where the data are very good, and we've

343
00:12:49,722 --> 00:12:51,550
actually learned they don't have an atmosphere.

344
00:12:52,425 --> 00:12:54,945
So they might be similar to to

345
00:12:55,303 --> 00:12:57,397
mercury in our own solar system where Mercury

346
00:12:57,455 --> 00:13:00,086
because it's hot and relatively low mass was

347
00:13:00,086 --> 00:13:01,919
not able to retain its atmosphere. And so

348
00:13:01,919 --> 00:13:03,035
that's really exciting.

349
00:13:03,529 --> 00:13:05,766
We're now at the point of probing what

350
00:13:05,766 --> 00:13:07,305
the astronomers call the cosmic

351
00:13:07,684 --> 00:13:10,820
shoreline. We're trying to figure out how cold

352
00:13:11,213 --> 00:13:12,031
and how

353
00:13:12,565 --> 00:13:14,871
how massive does a rocky planet it have

354
00:13:14,871 --> 00:13:17,495
to be when we first see it it

355
00:13:17,495 --> 00:13:19,656
it's able to retain that at... Sphere as

356
00:13:19,656 --> 00:13:21,959
opposed to losing it entirely, which, of course,

357
00:13:22,118 --> 00:13:24,660
puts it on a completely different path both

358
00:13:24,660 --> 00:13:27,123
for its evolution and also for the prospects

359
00:13:27,123 --> 00:13:30,243
of potentially hosting life. So And in in

360
00:13:30,243 --> 00:13:33,359
your research, looking at atmospheres. What is there

361
00:13:33,359 --> 00:13:36,475
1 thing that has surprised you the most?

362
00:13:37,209 --> 00:13:39,606
In terms of you know, what you've learned

363
00:13:39,606 --> 00:13:40,725
about Exoplanet,

364
00:13:41,524 --> 00:13:43,042
atmospheres or is, is it is there a

365
00:13:43,042 --> 00:13:45,120
new surprise every day for you?

366
00:13:45,855 --> 00:13:47,475
Well, I would say the,

367
00:13:47,934 --> 00:13:48,894
you know, the story...

368
00:13:49,375 --> 00:13:50,894
When you work in Exoplanets, you sort of

369
00:13:50,894 --> 00:13:52,014
have to get used to surprises.

370
00:13:52,575 --> 00:13:54,495
Right? Because as Sarah was describing,

371
00:13:54,989 --> 00:13:56,581
just in terms of the population of planets,

372
00:13:57,138 --> 00:13:59,208
most of the planets that we know about

373
00:13:59,208 --> 00:14:00,026
orbiting other

374
00:14:00,402 --> 00:14:02,790
stars have no analog in the solar system.

375
00:14:03,442 --> 00:14:06,328
Okay? They're intermediate and size between earth

376
00:14:06,783 --> 00:14:09,169
and, you know, neptune. Okay? We don't have

377
00:14:09,169 --> 00:14:11,169
anything like that. In our solar system,

378
00:14:12,121 --> 00:14:14,738
and yet most planets that we've discovered are

379
00:14:14,738 --> 00:14:17,355
are in that in that middle zone. And

380
00:14:17,355 --> 00:14:17,855
so,

381
00:14:18,803 --> 00:14:21,301
then, you know, pretty much by definition, their

382
00:14:21,360 --> 00:14:23,198
atmospheres and their properties are are also gonna

383
00:14:23,198 --> 00:14:23,698
be

384
00:14:24,317 --> 00:14:25,515
complete surprises.

385
00:14:26,089 --> 00:14:28,389
So I I would say that learning about

386
00:14:28,389 --> 00:14:30,134
the atmospheres of those planets,

387
00:14:30,927 --> 00:14:32,752
which are sometimes called water worlds.

388
00:14:33,324 --> 00:14:35,878
Or mini neptune or super and that just

389
00:14:35,878 --> 00:14:37,155
reflects the fact that we don't know what

390
00:14:37,155 --> 00:14:39,470
the heck really are. That will tell us

391
00:14:39,470 --> 00:14:41,466
their true identities. That will tell us whether

392
00:14:41,466 --> 00:14:43,898
they really are more similar to Neptune

393
00:14:44,277 --> 00:14:46,835
or more similar to to the earth with

394
00:14:46,835 --> 00:14:49,472
maybe some hydrogen on top. So so that's

395
00:14:49,472 --> 00:14:51,310
sort of a surprise I would say in

396
00:14:51,310 --> 00:14:51,630
waiting.

397
00:14:52,443 --> 00:14:53,081
So Sarah,

398
00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:56,752
observing signs of life on an exoplanet would

399
00:14:56,752 --> 00:14:59,785
be a profound event for humanity.

400
00:15:00,438 --> 00:15:01,734
What are the bios

401
00:15:02,588 --> 00:15:05,535
that astronomers like you are are looking for?

402
00:15:06,412 --> 00:15:08,482
It turns out this is an incredibly loaded

403
00:15:08,482 --> 00:15:08,881
question.

404
00:15:09,531 --> 00:15:12,782
And as we unfold the observations and get

405
00:15:12,782 --> 00:15:14,074
closer to the day

406
00:15:14,447 --> 00:15:16,532
when making such a

407
00:15:17,397 --> 00:15:20,342
detection becomes reality. It's just incredibly messy.

408
00:15:21,854 --> 00:15:24,973
So we've worked like microbe in particular, over

409
00:15:24,973 --> 00:15:26,804
the last couple decades to literally come up

410
00:15:26,804 --> 00:15:29,670
with a list of every molecule that's in

411
00:15:29,670 --> 00:15:30,568
gas phase

412
00:15:31,182 --> 00:15:33,267
at a habitable world temperature impression and there's

413
00:15:33,267 --> 00:15:35,019
a lot of them. There's, like 14000. I

414
00:15:35,019 --> 00:15:36,315
mean, large majority are

415
00:15:36,690 --> 00:15:39,397
compounds, but... And we've kind of worked through

416
00:15:39,397 --> 00:15:41,958
classes of molecules or... You know, other people

417
00:15:41,958 --> 00:15:43,549
are growing group of people work on this

418
00:15:43,549 --> 00:15:44,026
as well.

419
00:15:44,901 --> 00:15:46,810
The reason I'm hesitating to give a direct

420
00:15:46,810 --> 00:15:46,969
answer,

421
00:15:47,939 --> 00:15:50,269
is because we will be faced with 3

422
00:15:50,406 --> 00:15:53,191
incredibly important questions. 1 is the signal real.

423
00:15:54,624 --> 00:15:56,534
Any gas we're looking for is likely to

424
00:15:56,534 --> 00:15:59,091
be a trace gas not there at huge

425
00:15:59,091 --> 00:15:59,488
quantities.

426
00:16:00,759 --> 00:16:03,140
Second 1 is the signal attributed to the

427
00:16:03,140 --> 00:16:03,696
right molecule.

428
00:16:04,172 --> 00:16:06,572
And then the third question assuming the first

429
00:16:06,572 --> 00:16:09,378
2 pass some bar is the molecule

430
00:16:09,753 --> 00:16:11,026
produced by life or does it have an

431
00:16:11,026 --> 00:16:12,060
antibiotic false positive?

432
00:16:12,871 --> 00:16:15,359
So what we've largely found is that for

433
00:16:15,655 --> 00:16:18,143
nearly every gas of interest, there are multiple

434
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:18,837
options for...

435
00:16:19,726 --> 00:16:21,816
For how to assign the gas, and

436
00:16:22,429 --> 00:16:24,814
it's gonna be a tricky situation. My favorite

437
00:16:24,814 --> 00:16:27,596
gas personally, is so oxygen. Oxygen is a

438
00:16:27,596 --> 00:16:29,997
highly reactive gas shouldn't be in our atmosphere

439
00:16:29,997 --> 00:16:32,224
unless it's continually produced. I mean, there are

440
00:16:32,224 --> 00:16:34,928
ways to Produce oxygen without life. And our

441
00:16:34,928 --> 00:16:37,727
telescope the James webb space telescope isn't... Quite

442
00:16:37,727 --> 00:16:40,275
capable of detecting oxygen right now. But we

443
00:16:40,275 --> 00:16:41,628
have a huge list of other gases,

444
00:16:42,504 --> 00:16:45,392
and those include pho. They include

445
00:16:45,943 --> 00:16:48,517
you know, dime cell. There's literally

446
00:16:49,134 --> 00:16:50,808
a good long list of molecules we're are

447
00:16:50,808 --> 00:16:51,207
interested in?

448
00:16:52,244 --> 00:16:54,318
And how do you sort of get away

449
00:16:54,318 --> 00:16:56,881
from the the sort of earth and and

450
00:16:56,881 --> 00:16:59,664
solar system bias when you're coming up with

451
00:16:59,664 --> 00:17:00,164
lists

452
00:17:00,697 --> 00:17:03,003
of chemicals to look for. Or you you

453
00:17:03,003 --> 00:17:03,615
have to be

454
00:17:04,052 --> 00:17:05,188
very imaginative

455
00:17:05,642 --> 00:17:07,948
in terms of what sort of life you're

456
00:17:07,948 --> 00:17:08,448
imagining

457
00:17:08,823 --> 00:17:11,129
on a distant planet. Well, we aren't able

458
00:17:11,129 --> 00:17:12,560
to go from what the life is to

459
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:14,801
what it will produce. We're just making the

460
00:17:14,801 --> 00:17:17,345
assumption that life elsewhere like life on earth

461
00:17:17,345 --> 00:17:19,570
should use chemistry to extract energy from the

462
00:17:19,570 --> 00:17:20,762
environment to store energy.

463
00:17:21,414 --> 00:17:23,727
And to metabolize and in the process produce

464
00:17:23,727 --> 00:17:24,525
a waste gas.

465
00:17:25,163 --> 00:17:27,077
So we're sticking with this general idea that

466
00:17:27,077 --> 00:17:28,911
there should be a gas that doesn't belong

467
00:17:28,911 --> 00:17:31,065
that's far out of equilibrium with its environment.

468
00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:33,019
And so

469
00:17:33,720 --> 00:17:36,359
there's no magic bullet, basically. That's why I

470
00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:37,960
started by saying that we've tried to come

471
00:17:37,960 --> 00:17:39,099
with a list of all molecules

472
00:17:39,493 --> 00:17:41,642
of interests, literally, like, whether or not they're

473
00:17:41,642 --> 00:17:43,791
produced by life on earth. And and when

474
00:17:43,791 --> 00:17:45,463
you're doing this research, I mean, do you

475
00:17:45,463 --> 00:17:46,816
work with Chemists?

476
00:17:47,387 --> 00:17:50,251
Who who addressed this problem. I suppose from

477
00:17:50,251 --> 00:17:52,001
a from a chemical point of view. Is

478
00:17:52,001 --> 00:17:54,069
that... Is that a part of your sort

479
00:17:54,069 --> 00:17:56,312
of day to day research? I do have

480
00:17:56,312 --> 00:17:57,508
bio on my team,

481
00:17:58,305 --> 00:18:00,217
but it's not really necessary at this point

482
00:18:00,217 --> 00:18:01,652
because we're still at that point of trying

483
00:18:01,652 --> 00:18:03,700
to detect trying to assign the molecule and

484
00:18:03,818 --> 00:18:05,561
trying to believe if the signals real or

485
00:18:05,561 --> 00:18:08,255
not. So, Sarah, a growing number of earth

486
00:18:08,255 --> 00:18:10,553
like exoplanets are being discovered.

487
00:18:11,364 --> 00:18:13,917
Are these the only places where astronomers are

488
00:18:13,917 --> 00:18:16,710
looking for signs of life or could life

489
00:18:16,710 --> 00:18:19,675
exist on other types of Exoplanets? That's a

490
00:18:19,675 --> 00:18:21,740
great question. Let's call them at earth size

491
00:18:21,740 --> 00:18:23,090
because we don't know if they're earth like

492
00:18:23,090 --> 00:18:23,249
yet.

493
00:18:24,044 --> 00:18:25,950
And, you know, it's just so hard as

494
00:18:26,029 --> 00:18:28,669
Dave was sane and earth... Sized planet likely

495
00:18:28,669 --> 00:18:31,138
has a tiny atmosphere. Think of like the

496
00:18:31,138 --> 00:18:32,572
skin of an onion on an onion.

497
00:18:33,688 --> 00:18:34,245
So tiny.

498
00:18:35,374 --> 00:18:37,442
So it's kind of like the person looking

499
00:18:37,442 --> 00:18:40,465
for their lost keys and looking under the

500
00:18:40,465 --> 00:18:40,942
street lamp.

501
00:18:42,554 --> 00:18:43,835
That's what we're kind of trying to do.

502
00:18:43,994 --> 00:18:45,835
We're trying to broaden our perspectives so we

503
00:18:45,835 --> 00:18:47,375
have a better chance to find

504
00:18:48,154 --> 00:18:48,714
signs of life.

505
00:18:49,688 --> 00:18:51,677
So the next, you know, biggest type of

506
00:18:51,677 --> 00:18:53,667
planet are these so called mini neptune, and

507
00:18:53,667 --> 00:18:55,179
there's 2 thrust going on there.

508
00:18:55,816 --> 00:18:57,820
1 is an idea that like Earth has

509
00:18:57,820 --> 00:18:59,570
an aerial biosphere here. We have life in

510
00:18:59,570 --> 00:19:00,047
our clouds.

511
00:19:00,922 --> 00:19:02,832
Perhaps there's life in the clouds and other

512
00:19:02,832 --> 00:19:03,150
planets.

513
00:19:04,199 --> 00:19:06,113
And these mini neptune, the ones we can

514
00:19:06,113 --> 00:19:07,946
access now. They're typically too hot at their

515
00:19:07,946 --> 00:19:10,338
surface for life. But in the clouds, just

516
00:19:10,338 --> 00:19:11,773
like on earth as you go up into

517
00:19:11,773 --> 00:19:13,785
the clouds the atmosphere gets. Cooler, so to

518
00:19:13,785 --> 00:19:16,664
on other planets. So there's that idea, but,

519
00:19:16,744 --> 00:19:18,585
you know, people have had that idea before

520
00:19:18,585 --> 00:19:20,505
for Jupiter, like Carl Saga tried to propose.

521
00:19:20,664 --> 00:19:22,438
There could be life on Jupiter, and in

522
00:19:22,438 --> 00:19:24,352
that situation, if the surface is too hot,

523
00:19:24,512 --> 00:19:26,107
we you have to just have a kind

524
00:19:26,107 --> 00:19:28,659
of con confined scenario where the down drafts

525
00:19:28,659 --> 00:19:30,892
wouldn't bring life too far downwards too hot.

526
00:19:32,104 --> 00:19:32,604
Others

527
00:19:33,381 --> 00:19:35,775
take this idea of the so called mini...

528
00:19:35,935 --> 00:19:37,851
The many neptune being so called water worlds.

529
00:19:38,489 --> 00:19:40,539
And, you know, there are some scenarios where

530
00:19:40,978 --> 00:19:43,851
the water world may literally have a liquid

531
00:19:43,851 --> 00:19:47,043
water ocean, a hot water ocean. Maybe not

532
00:19:47,043 --> 00:19:48,421
too hot for life, but

533
00:19:48,894 --> 00:19:50,332
so hot and that there might be life

534
00:19:50,332 --> 00:19:52,089
in those oceans. So we're literally,

535
00:19:52,569 --> 00:19:54,965
maybe even pushing the pendulum too far, maybe

536
00:19:54,965 --> 00:19:56,812
not. But we're trying to be as open

537
00:19:56,812 --> 00:19:58,482
as possible so we don't miss our chance

538
00:19:58,482 --> 00:20:00,494
to find signs of life with our current

539
00:20:00,710 --> 00:20:01,823
James webb telescope.

540
00:20:02,794 --> 00:20:05,047
And and, Sir, what's your your sort of

541
00:20:05,184 --> 00:20:07,257
overall view on the existence of life?

542
00:20:08,213 --> 00:20:10,047
I mean, do you think that life must?

543
00:20:11,016 --> 00:20:13,080
Occur out there somewhere. It would just be

544
00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:13,580
a

545
00:20:13,953 --> 00:20:15,961
almost a mathematical impossibility

546
00:20:16,334 --> 00:20:17,230
that it didn't

547
00:20:17,604 --> 00:20:20,255
or you know, is it possible that Earth

548
00:20:20,255 --> 00:20:22,654
is the only place in the... Well, at

549
00:20:22,654 --> 00:20:25,855
least in the near universe where life exists.

550
00:20:26,348 --> 00:20:28,284
Well, since it's a physics podcast,

551
00:20:29,060 --> 00:20:31,474
we really couldn't answer that question

552
00:20:31,932 --> 00:20:34,325
in any way quantitatively until we better understand

553
00:20:34,325 --> 00:20:35,601
the origin of life on earth. You know,

554
00:20:35,680 --> 00:20:38,502
we have giant holes in our in our

555
00:20:38,558 --> 00:20:40,944
understanding of how life on earth arose, but

556
00:20:40,944 --> 00:20:42,613
just speculating for a moment,

557
00:20:43,408 --> 00:20:45,317
we see the ingredients for life everywhere. You

558
00:20:45,317 --> 00:20:45,476
know,

559
00:20:46,127 --> 00:20:48,595
meteorites have amino acids. We see all kinds

560
00:20:48,595 --> 00:20:50,825
of complex organic molecules in the intra interstellar

561
00:20:50,825 --> 00:20:52,894
medium. That doesn't mean they survive when they

562
00:20:52,894 --> 00:20:53,611
make it to a planet.

563
00:20:54,262 --> 00:20:56,328
But it seems like the ingredients for life

564
00:20:56,328 --> 00:20:59,189
are quite straightforward to form. And just given

565
00:20:59,189 --> 00:21:01,096
the number of stars in our galaxy alone,

566
00:21:01,335 --> 00:21:02,686
hundreds of billions of stars.

567
00:21:03,179 --> 00:21:06,135
And the idea, a reality that there are

568
00:21:06,135 --> 00:21:08,532
hundreds of billions of galaxies out there. Surely

569
00:21:08,532 --> 00:21:09,570
there is life elsewhere.

570
00:21:10,304 --> 00:21:12,460
But the question we're facing right now, Dave

571
00:21:12,460 --> 00:21:14,296
and I and all the others working on

572
00:21:14,695 --> 00:21:15,094
Exoplanets is,

573
00:21:15,972 --> 00:21:17,968
is there life on a planet orbiting a

574
00:21:17,968 --> 00:21:19,820
star near enough and right enough, for us

575
00:21:19,820 --> 00:21:21,019
to find a sign now.

576
00:21:22,059 --> 00:21:23,900
And finding a sign of life now doesn't

577
00:21:23,900 --> 00:21:25,259
mean we'll be sure there's life out there,

578
00:21:25,500 --> 00:21:27,854
but it means it'll be enough for to

579
00:21:27,994 --> 00:21:29,672
fuel the search to keep going.

580
00:21:30,951 --> 00:21:33,108
And, Sarah, is there always going to be

581
00:21:33,108 --> 00:21:33,928
some sort of

582
00:21:34,627 --> 00:21:36,625
ambiguity involved in these measurements?

583
00:21:36,959 --> 00:21:39,195
You know, you might have... You might see

584
00:21:39,195 --> 00:21:40,174
lots of bios,

585
00:21:40,791 --> 00:21:43,107
but maybe at the end of the day,

586
00:21:43,266 --> 00:21:44,565
they could all have

587
00:21:45,182 --> 00:21:46,162
non biological

588
00:21:46,874 --> 00:21:49,104
origins, and, you know, you can never say,

589
00:21:49,662 --> 00:21:52,450
u, a hundred percent that there's life on

590
00:21:52,450 --> 00:21:52,769
that

591
00:21:53,326 --> 00:21:53,565
Exoplanet.

592
00:21:54,219 --> 00:21:56,773
There will always be an ambiguity with remote

593
00:21:56,773 --> 00:21:57,172
sensing.

594
00:21:57,810 --> 00:22:00,125
Some people have tried to put forward an

595
00:22:00,125 --> 00:22:01,721
idea that if you do see lots, you

596
00:22:01,721 --> 00:22:02,461
know, every

597
00:22:02,853 --> 00:22:04,760
planet that could have water has signs of

598
00:22:04,760 --> 00:22:07,461
water and signs of life that that, you

599
00:22:07,461 --> 00:22:08,279
know, collective

600
00:22:10,338 --> 00:22:12,651
set of observations may indicate there's life out

601
00:22:12,651 --> 00:22:14,645
there. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

602
00:22:14,884 --> 00:22:16,559
We're living in an amazing time. We have

603
00:22:16,559 --> 00:22:17,617
over 5000

604
00:22:17,915 --> 00:22:19,590
exoplanets. We know that rocky planets,

605
00:22:20,404 --> 00:22:22,481
Our common, we know that planets of all

606
00:22:22,481 --> 00:22:23,941
kinds in their habitable zone

607
00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:25,918
are out there, and we're on the verge

608
00:22:25,918 --> 00:22:27,676
of being able to find water vapor on

609
00:22:27,676 --> 00:22:28,475
habitable planets.

610
00:22:29,128 --> 00:22:30,882
Maybe some hints of signs of life that

611
00:22:30,882 --> 00:22:33,034
will keep us moving forward. And and what

612
00:22:33,034 --> 00:22:33,512
about

613
00:22:34,070 --> 00:22:36,063
you know, your your research and the research

614
00:22:36,063 --> 00:22:36,802
of others

615
00:22:37,434 --> 00:22:40,706
into how life could exist on other planets.

616
00:22:40,865 --> 00:22:44,558
Is is that informing in any way our

617
00:22:44,696 --> 00:22:47,585
understanding of of life on earth? Are we

618
00:22:47,585 --> 00:22:49,261
more open to...

619
00:22:49,900 --> 00:22:50,958
I don't know looking

620
00:22:52,214 --> 00:22:54,784
in, you know, places on earth where we

621
00:22:54,784 --> 00:22:56,625
might have thought life couldn't exist,

622
00:22:57,744 --> 00:22:59,184
but, you know, maybe it could.

623
00:23:00,224 --> 00:23:02,304
I would have to say not yet to

624
00:23:02,304 --> 00:23:04,637
that. You know, and earth people have looked

625
00:23:04,637 --> 00:23:07,194
literally every everywhere they can for life, like,

626
00:23:07,273 --> 00:23:09,351
in the dries deserts and the most acidic

627
00:23:09,351 --> 00:23:09,830
environments.

628
00:23:10,482 --> 00:23:12,387
And so that research kind of goes on

629
00:23:12,387 --> 00:23:13,102
in parallel.

630
00:23:13,737 --> 00:23:15,665
We always like to hope though that studying

631
00:23:15,721 --> 00:23:18,658
exoplanets, the search for life or exoplanets themselves

632
00:23:18,658 --> 00:23:19,109
will

633
00:23:19,863 --> 00:23:20,601
feedback onto

634
00:23:21,530 --> 00:23:23,117
our understanding of our own planet, and it

635
00:23:23,117 --> 00:23:25,973
might well 1 day. So looking towards the

636
00:23:25,973 --> 00:23:29,438
future. What new telescopes are are you both

637
00:23:29,577 --> 00:23:32,609
most excited about? And why? David, do you

638
00:23:32,609 --> 00:23:35,259
wanna go first with your answer? I think

639
00:23:35,259 --> 00:23:37,839
the news here is that there are some

640
00:23:37,980 --> 00:23:39,039
incredibly powerful

641
00:23:40,140 --> 00:23:40,640
ob

642
00:23:41,500 --> 00:23:41,954
that

643
00:23:42,472 --> 00:23:43,768
will be coming online

644
00:23:44,143 --> 00:23:45,837
and are gonna probe

645
00:23:46,690 --> 00:23:48,145
regions of parameter space

646
00:23:48,520 --> 00:23:49,577
that have been

647
00:23:49,888 --> 00:23:50,388
previously

648
00:23:50,839 --> 00:23:53,772
inaccessible to to study. Okay? So it's a

649
00:23:53,772 --> 00:23:54,906
tremendously exciting

650
00:23:56,785 --> 00:23:56,943
future.

651
00:23:58,230 --> 00:24:00,163
The next big mission

652
00:24:00,539 --> 00:24:03,484
that will advance our understanding of Exoplanets is

653
00:24:03,484 --> 00:24:05,178
called the Nancy Grace Roman

654
00:24:05,569 --> 00:24:07,727
telescope. It's a Nasa facility.

655
00:24:08,606 --> 00:24:11,003
And so what it will do is it

656
00:24:11,003 --> 00:24:11,723
will do

657
00:24:12,122 --> 00:24:14,360
a micro lens survey. So that's a different

658
00:24:14,360 --> 00:24:18,286
method that allows us to find planets that

659
00:24:18,286 --> 00:24:20,042
are very, very far from their stars.

660
00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:23,965
The the most successful methods to date Namely

661
00:24:23,965 --> 00:24:26,113
the transit method when planets pass in front

662
00:24:26,113 --> 00:24:28,738
of their star and the wobble method when

663
00:24:28,738 --> 00:24:31,856
there's the gravitational orbit of the of the

664
00:24:31,856 --> 00:24:33,846
star and the planet around their common center

665
00:24:33,846 --> 00:24:36,870
of mass, those both favor close end planets.

666
00:24:37,507 --> 00:24:39,779
But if you were trying to understand the

667
00:24:39,919 --> 00:24:41,759
formation of the solar system and all you

668
00:24:41,759 --> 00:24:43,919
knew about where the inner planets, you'd probably

669
00:24:43,919 --> 00:24:46,329
have a very incomplete theory. So we really

670
00:24:46,329 --> 00:24:48,314
need to know about Saturn and uranus and

671
00:24:48,314 --> 00:24:48,711
neptune,

672
00:24:49,267 --> 00:24:51,490
and how common those are around other stars.

673
00:24:51,887 --> 00:24:53,609
And so I'm very, very excited about that

674
00:24:53,808 --> 00:24:55,710
that mission which will hopefully launch in just

675
00:24:55,710 --> 00:24:56,423
a few years.

676
00:24:58,325 --> 00:24:59,118
After that,

677
00:24:59,673 --> 00:25:00,965
the next big project

678
00:25:01,274 --> 00:25:03,585
will be on the ground, and it will

679
00:25:03,585 --> 00:25:03,824
be,

680
00:25:05,338 --> 00:25:06,635
a class of telescope

681
00:25:07,330 --> 00:25:08,787
called the extremely large

682
00:25:09,099 --> 00:25:11,254
telescopes, and there's 3 of them. They're being

683
00:25:11,254 --> 00:25:13,569
built by different nations and different cons consortium.

684
00:25:14,367 --> 00:25:15,485
But they will have,

685
00:25:15,964 --> 00:25:18,769
a tremendous aperture, basically be much larger than

686
00:25:18,769 --> 00:25:21,469
any ground based telescope that operates in the

687
00:25:21,469 --> 00:25:23,058
optical and and for it has ever been.

688
00:25:23,773 --> 00:25:24,726
And they will,

689
00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:26,496
allow us to gather

690
00:25:26,950 --> 00:25:29,028
more photon. More light than we never been

691
00:25:29,028 --> 00:25:31,489
able to do and really study these atmospheres

692
00:25:31,489 --> 00:25:33,236
at very high spectral resolution.

693
00:25:34,188 --> 00:25:36,013
And so they might allow us to really

694
00:25:36,013 --> 00:25:36,545
study. It's

695
00:25:37,305 --> 00:25:39,965
the the specific chemistry of these atmospheres

696
00:25:40,345 --> 00:25:41,725
and really go after

697
00:25:42,105 --> 00:25:43,945
potentially even some of these some of these

698
00:25:43,945 --> 00:25:44,445
bios

699
00:25:45,305 --> 00:25:45,805
molecules,

700
00:25:46,837 --> 00:25:47,395
as well.

701
00:25:48,432 --> 00:25:50,666
And so those might be coming online in

702
00:25:50,666 --> 00:25:51,325
the next

703
00:25:51,702 --> 00:25:53,617
well, I would say 5 to 10 years.

704
00:25:54,574 --> 00:25:55,553
And then finally,

705
00:25:56,423 --> 00:25:58,755
that the next big Nasa emission

706
00:25:59,927 --> 00:26:02,418
is called the habitable worlds observatory.

707
00:26:02,794 --> 00:26:04,467
And so that's that's sort of a working

708
00:26:04,467 --> 00:26:06,468
name So III

709
00:26:06,468 --> 00:26:07,659
anticipate that when it launches,

710
00:26:08,532 --> 00:26:11,391
maybe 15 years from now, it will be

711
00:26:11,391 --> 00:26:14,034
given a different name. But it will

712
00:26:14,423 --> 00:26:16,913
really allow us to study the atmospheres

713
00:26:17,288 --> 00:26:18,345
of earth

714
00:26:18,721 --> 00:26:21,847
like planets orbiting sun like stars. So real

715
00:26:22,318 --> 00:26:25,271
twins we hope of the Earth's sun system.

716
00:26:25,670 --> 00:26:29,021
I mentioned before that the only rocky planets

717
00:26:29,021 --> 00:26:30,868
who's at spheres, we can hope to study

718
00:26:30,868 --> 00:26:32,780
in the near future are the ones that

719
00:26:32,780 --> 00:26:35,089
orbit these low mass stars, these these red

720
00:26:35,089 --> 00:26:35,726
dwarf stars.

721
00:26:36,443 --> 00:26:39,326
But maybe there's something about those kinds of

722
00:26:39,326 --> 00:26:41,956
stars that preclude the existence of life. Maybe

723
00:26:41,956 --> 00:26:44,108
they put out too much uv light. Maybe

724
00:26:44,108 --> 00:26:45,942
they always strip away the atmospheres of their

725
00:26:45,942 --> 00:26:48,027
planets we're gonna find that out over the

726
00:26:48,027 --> 00:26:48,664
next 5 years.

727
00:26:49,699 --> 00:26:51,711
So that's why it's important that we simultaneously

728
00:26:52,723 --> 00:26:54,529
pursue this other path

729
00:26:54,887 --> 00:26:56,817
where we are building the technology

730
00:26:57,270 --> 00:27:00,289
to really look at the atmospheres of Earth

731
00:27:00,289 --> 00:27:01,504
sun analog.

732
00:27:02,293 --> 00:27:02,793
And

733
00:27:03,170 --> 00:27:05,483
that's why the habitable world observatory, which will

734
00:27:05,483 --> 00:27:07,796
be able to spatial isolate the planets and

735
00:27:07,796 --> 00:27:10,348
actually see the reflected light and do spectroscopy

736
00:27:10,348 --> 00:27:11,226
on that reflected light.

737
00:27:11,960 --> 00:27:15,000
That's gonna be really, really demanding technologically,

738
00:27:15,320 --> 00:27:16,680
but I know that, you know, the community's

739
00:27:16,680 --> 00:27:18,519
is up to the task. And, of course,

740
00:27:18,680 --> 00:27:18,920
the,

741
00:27:20,532 --> 00:27:22,830
the idea of having having access to this

742
00:27:22,830 --> 00:27:25,287
really profound question is is what drives us

743
00:27:25,287 --> 00:27:26,317
all forward.

744
00:27:27,918 --> 00:27:29,612
1 question we have

745
00:27:30,543 --> 00:27:32,157
back to your earlier

746
00:27:32,850 --> 00:27:33,884
question and the con is,

747
00:27:34,854 --> 00:27:36,532
are we too t centric When we go

748
00:27:36,532 --> 00:27:38,929
out there with the Habitable world observatory, will

749
00:27:38,929 --> 00:27:40,448
we find earth like worlds?

750
00:27:41,167 --> 00:27:42,525
Or will they be all like venus?

751
00:27:43,258 --> 00:27:44,056
Or something else.

752
00:27:45,172 --> 00:27:47,005
And I've just spent a few years on

753
00:27:47,005 --> 00:27:48,998
what started out as this tangent that has

754
00:27:48,998 --> 00:27:49,498
grown

755
00:27:49,954 --> 00:27:51,070
into my favorite mission,

756
00:27:51,884 --> 00:27:54,681
which is this consortium I'm leading, we call

757
00:27:54,681 --> 00:27:57,158
ourselves the mornings star missions to venus.

758
00:27:57,717 --> 00:27:59,555
We're going to be a series of private

759
00:27:59,555 --> 00:27:59,875
public,

760
00:28:00,686 --> 00:28:02,833
Partnership funded missions to venus with a singular

761
00:28:02,833 --> 00:28:05,140
goal to find complex molecules, signs of life

762
00:28:05,140 --> 00:28:07,620
or life itself in the venus atmosphere. And

763
00:28:07,620 --> 00:28:09,604
this is building on a crazy idea from

764
00:28:09,604 --> 00:28:11,668
half a century ago, Carl Saga that if

765
00:28:11,668 --> 00:28:13,255
the surface of venus is too hot for

766
00:28:13,255 --> 00:28:14,366
life, which we all think it is.

767
00:28:15,177 --> 00:28:17,328
That high up in the atmosphere 50 kilometers

768
00:28:17,328 --> 00:28:19,480
above the surface as it gets colder. It's

769
00:28:19,480 --> 00:28:21,870
the right temperature for life. The problem is

770
00:28:21,870 --> 00:28:24,181
that venus unlike earth doesn't have water clouds.

771
00:28:24,673 --> 00:28:27,141
It has clouds made of acid, sulfur acid,

772
00:28:27,380 --> 00:28:29,449
which is orders of magnitude more acidic than

773
00:28:29,449 --> 00:28:31,359
the most acidic environments on earth where life

774
00:28:31,359 --> 00:28:31,678
is found.

775
00:28:32,553 --> 00:28:34,088
Yet lately, my team

776
00:28:34,558 --> 00:28:36,943
and a couple of others have been experimenting

777
00:28:36,943 --> 00:28:39,566
with sulfur acid and have demonstrated that some

778
00:28:39,566 --> 00:28:42,110
key biological molecules are stable in sulfur gas.

779
00:28:42,283 --> 00:28:45,294
Said amino acids, nucleic acid bases, fatty acids

780
00:28:45,294 --> 00:28:46,245
growing list of things,

781
00:28:46,879 --> 00:28:49,390
and we're building towards generating a synthetic, said

782
00:28:50,064 --> 00:28:52,443
informational polymer, not rd dna which is unstable,

783
00:28:52,601 --> 00:28:55,615
but swapping out parts to demonstrate that there

784
00:28:55,615 --> 00:28:57,534
could be some kind of primitive life, in

785
00:28:57,534 --> 00:28:58,913
the atmosphere to motivate

786
00:28:59,452 --> 00:29:00,830
people to get us

787
00:29:01,210 --> 00:29:01,849
back to Venus.

788
00:29:02,568 --> 00:29:04,666
So I would say my favorite missions

789
00:29:05,537 --> 00:29:08,185
or my favorite upcoming missions are small

790
00:29:08,639 --> 00:29:09,696
disruptive missions

791
00:29:10,230 --> 00:29:12,082
that complement these larger

792
00:29:13,434 --> 00:29:13,934
community

793
00:29:14,315 --> 00:29:15,454
based ones that

794
00:29:15,755 --> 00:29:16,394
Dave has mentioned.

795
00:29:17,434 --> 00:29:19,835
So guys, I I can't let you go

796
00:29:19,835 --> 00:29:20,734
without asking

797
00:29:21,368 --> 00:29:22,805
What is your favorite

798
00:29:23,364 --> 00:29:24,481
Exoplanet and why?

799
00:29:25,439 --> 00:29:27,753
Before I tell you the name of my

800
00:29:27,753 --> 00:29:28,232
favorite

801
00:29:28,711 --> 00:29:29,030
Exoplanet,

802
00:29:29,603 --> 00:29:31,299
I have to prepare you

803
00:29:31,675 --> 00:29:33,587
because, of course, in science fiction, I'm a

804
00:29:33,587 --> 00:29:35,261
big science fiction fan.

805
00:29:35,978 --> 00:29:40,146
Planets have... Have really wonderful dramatic names. You

806
00:29:40,146 --> 00:29:41,584
can think of H.

807
00:29:42,543 --> 00:29:44,721
Okay, from Star Wars or Ara

808
00:29:45,275 --> 00:29:46,394
from from June.

809
00:29:47,914 --> 00:29:49,134
Unfortunately, in

810
00:29:49,515 --> 00:29:50,394
in the real world,

811
00:29:51,275 --> 00:29:52,015
the planets

812
00:29:52,968 --> 00:29:56,147
get named after their stars by pending a

813
00:29:56,147 --> 00:29:57,442
lowercase b

814
00:29:57,816 --> 00:29:59,644
to the name of the star. And the

815
00:29:59,644 --> 00:30:00,144
stars

816
00:30:00,518 --> 00:30:01,733
themselves only have

817
00:30:02,123 --> 00:30:03,398
catalog numbers.

818
00:30:04,593 --> 00:30:07,461
Okay? So so so it could be that

819
00:30:07,461 --> 00:30:08,200
the first

820
00:30:08,657 --> 00:30:10,808
planet that we find that has signs of

821
00:30:10,808 --> 00:30:11,366
life on it.

822
00:30:12,497 --> 00:30:14,890
Has has an absolutely dreadful name, and I

823
00:30:14,890 --> 00:30:17,123
just wanna prepare the community for that. Alright.

824
00:30:17,362 --> 00:30:19,697
So then that being said, my

825
00:30:20,234 --> 00:30:21,611
my favorite planet

826
00:30:21,923 --> 00:30:23,697
is called L nhs

827
00:30:24,550 --> 00:30:25,448
11:40

828
00:30:25,744 --> 00:30:26,063
b.

829
00:30:27,178 --> 00:30:28,292
Why is it my favorite planet?

830
00:30:29,009 --> 00:30:29,247
Well,

831
00:30:30,058 --> 00:30:31,985
it's because it is

832
00:30:32,832 --> 00:30:35,845
Rocky planet, a terrestrial world. We know it's

833
00:30:35,845 --> 00:30:38,482
mass and it's it's its size,

834
00:30:39,120 --> 00:30:41,434
and therefore it's density very well. And we

835
00:30:41,434 --> 00:30:43,051
really think it looks like

836
00:30:43,827 --> 00:30:46,073
basically a scaled up version of the earth

837
00:30:46,073 --> 00:30:48,539
in terms of its bulk composition, the amount

838
00:30:48,539 --> 00:30:49,198
of iron

839
00:30:49,653 --> 00:30:52,015
and the amount of of Rocky mantle

840
00:30:53,171 --> 00:30:55,804
and it orbits a very nearby star, so

841
00:30:55,804 --> 00:30:57,261
it's somewhat accessible

842
00:30:57,719 --> 00:31:00,127
and the planet as at just the right

843
00:31:00,127 --> 00:31:02,283
temperature, it's a little bit cooler actually than

844
00:31:02,283 --> 00:31:02,682
the Earth,

845
00:31:03,400 --> 00:31:05,795
and and the combination of the high surface

846
00:31:05,795 --> 00:31:08,030
gravity of the planet and the fact that

847
00:31:08,030 --> 00:31:09,263
it's relatively

848
00:31:09,721 --> 00:31:12,696
cool means that it might have retained its

849
00:31:12,834 --> 00:31:14,053
atmosphere, and

850
00:31:14,510 --> 00:31:16,346
and it's an old star as well. So

851
00:31:16,346 --> 00:31:17,200
it could be that

852
00:31:17,717 --> 00:31:20,343
life has had time to to take root,

853
00:31:20,979 --> 00:31:23,287
and we could study study that life through

854
00:31:23,287 --> 00:31:26,247
the planetary atmosphere. But the other connection is

855
00:31:26,247 --> 00:31:28,557
that it was discovered by me and my

856
00:31:28,557 --> 00:31:30,548
team, and we did that with a,

857
00:31:31,424 --> 00:31:33,336
a special observatory called the Mu.

858
00:31:34,069 --> 00:31:36,465
Array, which was an array of robotic ground

859
00:31:36,465 --> 00:31:39,341
based telescopes, 8 of them in Arizona, 8

860
00:31:39,341 --> 00:31:40,220
of them in Chile,

861
00:31:41,434 --> 00:31:43,195
when we first set out to study this

862
00:31:43,195 --> 00:31:45,195
this population of planets around these very low

863
00:31:45,195 --> 00:31:47,434
mass stars. And so it's... I think I

864
00:31:47,434 --> 00:31:49,606
think it's a really citing scientific opportunity, but

865
00:31:49,606 --> 00:31:52,341
it's also just very near and dear to

866
00:31:52,719 --> 00:31:54,635
to me and my team personally.

867
00:31:55,513 --> 00:31:56,630
So that's my favorite world.

868
00:31:58,480 --> 00:32:00,792
That's, David. Although, III should've have thought this

869
00:32:00,792 --> 00:32:02,467
out, and I should have I should've have

870
00:32:02,467 --> 00:32:05,019
asked, what what's the... What's your favorite exoplanet

871
00:32:05,019 --> 00:32:07,990
that you haven't discovered? But we'll we'll leave

872
00:32:07,990 --> 00:32:09,289
that to a different podcast.

873
00:32:09,990 --> 00:32:11,830
And how about you, Sarah? Well, I was

874
00:32:11,830 --> 00:32:13,590
gonna guess 11 and 40 be for you.

875
00:32:13,830 --> 00:32:14,470
So... Yay.

876
00:32:15,761 --> 00:32:17,906
And usually, I answer this question, my favorite

877
00:32:18,065 --> 00:32:19,574
Xl Planet is the next 1. It's 1

878
00:32:19,574 --> 00:32:21,719
in the future because we've been so astonished

879
00:32:21,719 --> 00:32:23,546
before, surely there are still a lot more

880
00:32:23,546 --> 00:32:24,181
surprises left.

881
00:32:25,468 --> 00:32:27,299
Well, that's great. That's a great place to

882
00:32:27,299 --> 00:32:30,165
end, and Sarah and David, thanks so much

883
00:32:30,165 --> 00:32:32,155
for taking the time to come on the

884
00:32:32,155 --> 00:32:33,325
podcast and

885
00:32:34,400 --> 00:32:35,356
congratulations on

886
00:32:35,834 --> 00:32:39,020
winning the C plot prize in astro. She

887
00:32:39,020 --> 00:32:40,056
must be very pleased.

888
00:32:41,105 --> 00:32:42,217
To be this year's winners.

889
00:32:42,932 --> 00:32:43,330
Thank you.

890
00:32:44,045 --> 00:32:45,316
Thanks a lot. This has been a lot

891
00:32:45,316 --> 00:32:45,634
of fun.

892
00:32:52,958 --> 00:32:54,705
I'm afraid that's all the time we have

893
00:32:54,705 --> 00:32:57,406
for this week's podcast, which is sponsored by

894
00:32:57,406 --> 00:32:58,439
the cavalry prize.

895
00:32:59,249 --> 00:33:02,765
Thanks to David Char and Sarah Sig for

896
00:33:02,765 --> 00:33:05,721
joining me today. And a special thanks to

897
00:33:05,721 --> 00:33:06,360
our producer,

898
00:33:06,854 --> 00:33:07,730
Fred Isles.

899
00:33:08,448 --> 00:33:09,963
We'll be back again next week.

900
00:33:19,068 --> 00:33:21,860
The cavalry prize is a partnership involving the

901
00:33:22,259 --> 00:33:24,652
Norwegian academy of science and letters.

902
00:33:25,464 --> 00:33:26,361
The Norwegian

903
00:33:26,734 --> 00:33:30,150
ministry of education and research and the C

904
00:33:30,785 --> 00:33:30,944
Foundation.

905
00:33:31,976 --> 00:33:34,676
Since the first awards in 2008,

906
00:33:34,915 --> 00:33:38,764
the c prizes have honored 65 scientists

907
00:33:39,217 --> 00:33:40,725
from 13 countries.

908
00:33:41,519 --> 00:33:43,131
Find out more at

909
00:33:43,504 --> 00:33:44,004
Prize

910
00:33:44,393 --> 00:33:45,029
dot org.

911
00:33:54,665 --> 00:33:57,373
There will be no weekly podcast on the

912
00:33:57,373 --> 00:33:58,249
fourth of July.

913
00:33:59,124 --> 00:34:01,433
Instead, you can tune in on the second

914
00:34:01,433 --> 00:34:04,947
of July for the first installment of Physics

915
00:34:04,947 --> 00:34:05,821
world live,

916
00:34:06,537 --> 00:34:09,024
which will focus on quantum sensors.

917
00:34:10,287 --> 00:34:13,310
Featuring a panel of experts, this live event

918
00:34:13,310 --> 00:34:15,481
will explore the extraordinary

919
00:34:16,015 --> 00:34:18,120
capabilities of quantum sensors

920
00:34:18,574 --> 00:34:20,981
and look at how they could benefit humanity

921
00:34:21,196 --> 00:34:23,739
and shape our understanding of the world.

922
00:34:24,550 --> 00:34:26,630
You can find out more on the Physics

923
00:34:26,789 --> 00:34:27,670
World website.

924
00:34:28,309 --> 00:34:31,930
Just click on the Physics world live tab

925
00:34:32,230 --> 00:34:34,163
near the top of the homepage.

Chapters

No chapters available.